Porn Addiction and the History of Sexuality

Satyr wrote:

Any "addiction" indicates a weakness which is more than just temporary.
The form an addiction takes, further clarifies the nature of the weakness.

Because human nature is more complex than animal nature, and because of the abstractive character of human culture, the need underlying the addiction is not easy to decipher.
Yet, the simpler the individual is, all the more easy it is to determine the nature underlying the addiction.
More complex minds require more complex analysis and explanation...but the same, basic, factors are at play, because we are all part of the same species.

The category "species", should be enough to decide the first step towards determining the addiction's source.

Then again, it is seen as empowerment, a test of character and overall spiritual progress to overcome an addiction/weakness/shortcoming/fault

The overcoming of a weakness is what strength is.

Are these cancerous creatures really to be considered as ''individuals'' and ''human'' and ''equal''; if 'being human' is nothing more than the ability (thus regardless of infertile sex) of sexual reproduction, and not about becoming, struggle, resisting, self-respect - than I prefer to be considered, from their perspective, as inhuman, subhuman; at least I will have my dignity not to be included within their egalitarian ideal.

In order to introduce a kind of an artificial ''equality''; all must be lowered (ie intellectual / potential suppression) and the common history falsified through a unnatural ideological perspective. In the pursuet of a hedonistic life, everyone can participate regardless of race, gender or orientation.

A species is subdivided by means of genetic differences, but when ideologically leveling these differences you get increasing ''unity'', such as: German Shepherd, Doberman, dog, wolf, mammal.
Dutch, German, Germanic, European, Eurasian, Human (within the sexual reproductive classification, and the lowest common denominator, if you go beyond that it falls outside the reproductive classification), mammal, animal, organism.

A ''owners manual of his mind, his imagination''..
Just by mimicking, whispering porn slurs, to such a pathetic excuse of a ''man''; just a male without spirit.
What imagination is there to be owned within such a mediocre mind, surely it is directed through the media and by sheltering, but even without such, what imagination there is but basic or ''specialized'' (impotent) desires.

Why do men watch porn?
Because it is promoted, socially accepted and in order to suppress the libidio - to release it constantly, if not through sports, than through impulsive masturbation.
And of course the many males whom have no chance at all with any reasonable woman, thus the promotion of such is a good control of their dissatisfaction - not Dissatisfied as with ''civilization'', but by being a unattractive, infantile Manchild who thinks he deserves but is denied. Some porn will do him good...

And the men, or stagnated males, who have potential...
Why be bothered by the (mental) rape of your people, if you can all forget through mindless masturbation, or mental masturbation (infertile ''discussions'').

What does one notice when training (mentally and/or physical) very hard, or afterwards:
That there is no sexual desire, your sexual organ might temporarily shrink even more so than when it is 'normal as not erect' - and you feel no sexual discontent by any ''lack'' of such.

In other words, you have given your libido an outlet through something more ''productive'', productive I propagate as non-economic, though over-working might as well be an outlet but rather unproductive in regards with your personal developments.

Do not adjust to any mediocre ''imagination'' to satisfy a low quality mind.
Porn is a cancer, as is Modernity an sich.

Quote :

""Pornography: the explicit description or display of sexual organs/activities, intended to stimulate sexual arousal.

Obscenity: identified in England by its capacity to ‘deprave or corrupt’ a significant number of people that come into contact with it; hence obscenity turns on the notion of a public good or public morality – a collective fantasy of a ‘civilised society’ or a higher moral horizon, actively preclusive of sex. A luminescent backdrop against which corruption can be identified.

Extreme pornography: in no small part, the result of the obsolescence of obscenity law given the obsolescence of this social fantasy and its replacement with an individualised, consumptive fantasy.[1] An individualism where one person’s deviance is not viewed to be contagious throughout the social body, but that the social body is conceived to be fragmentary and every experience containable within its own distributed community.[2][3] Hence, the concept of extreme pornography now provides for a new social order (extremity, not obscenity), where the laws try to force certain forms of death, negativity and risk from pornography and sex. It is not the explicit, amplified expression of the sexual act that degrades – for the values of sex and the material body of the individual have replaced the soul – but rather, it is the danger of amplifying the individual’s attraction to death that is to be feared. That, or perhaps more likely, it is the individual who produces themselves according to the signs of violence or death and thereby redeems their truth who is to be feared – those signs that appear by necessity in the negative mirror of the risk-averse, hyper-positivist society.

Regarding ‘obscenity’, Baudrillard has given the term what he considers to be a modern make-over, equating it more closely with its etymological origins. Taken from obscaena, the Latin for ‘offstage’, it refers to the Greek theatre’s practice of keeping potentially offensive material off stage. For Baudrillard then, the obscene refers to production-based societies’ tendency to bring everything on-stage, to make everything visible. Pornography is obscene in its explicitness because it makes visible the secret and explodes the sex-act beyond itself (Baudrillard, Seduction, p.29). Close-ups, amplified moans, copious cum-shots and over-sized organs; sex regularly viewed from outside the act – a new sex that destroys the fantasy of anticipated sex and replaces it with a realised image of sex, thus destroying the seductive potency of the unseen. The explicit nature of pornography is a reflection for Baudrillard of the explicit nature of the Western world: obscene in its endless expositions – categories, numbers, subjectivities, identities, sexualities, drives – a liberative uncovering of everything. Then an artificial magnification of everything, which leads to the disappearance of the visible itself – genes, neural-pathways, quanta, the anatomy of a pore.

Where pornography is the explicit, over-production of sex, in the same way, extreme pornography is born of the same process, but applied to sexual negativity: trauma, violence, abuse and so on. It is the pornographic mirror of survivor stories and PTSD abreactions; it is an amplification of both the body and emotions through pain. In as much as trauma must be made visible in every detail as trauma (one must endlessly ‘speak out’), so too must its other side, which is made visible in every detail as a psychopathic pleasure. Extreme pornography becomes the explicit detailing of the psychopathology of pleasure.[4]

Previously, speaking out was done in the context of sexual repression, of sexual shame – that is, in a context where the appearance of both sex and trauma were obscured. The resulting silence was precisely what energized (through pressure) both the voice by which trauma was expressed and the force by which trauma was compounded and made representable as trauma. By contrast, today’s speaking out is done inside the echo-chambers of the traumas of previous generations. Everybody today lives on-the-one-hand, in the imagination of liberal, over-produced sex, and on-the-other, within the sticky taboo of its psychopathic twin. The survivor’s story and extreme pornography are conjoined within the same imperative to produce and the same environment of erotic phantasmagoria. Nobody, today, has not, through their imagination, experienced the aesthetics of sexual trauma and as such, we can give birth both to its fantasy and its phobia. We can also perceive the origins of the sacred status attributed to the modern victim – in law, in porn, in power, and in the marketplace of identity. That through the legacy of historical silence, the victim (and the simulation of the victim) acquires a special significance, as does their abuser. In this, extreme pornography also returns a sacred aspect to its Eros which, in conventional pornography, is lost in the necessary disappearance of sexual/relational intimacy.[5]

There is something desperate about the screen, vampyric; like it is constantly failing to speak, as if it can never get close enough to our emotions or our nerves. As such, it fosters a communication of increasing extremity in its yearning for an ever deeper involvement with the viewer.[6] We can see this online in troll-culture or the gender wars or in new activism more generally – conflict, the machine of identity and de-localized involvement.

The screen is naturally smooth, sensually atextural and in the era of LCDs, visually discrete in its images – HD is a less watery/blending mosaic. Moreover, the screen has a knack of communicating beneath the surface of its content – a sub-contentual communication of blended senses (aural and visual) and juxtapositional images/sounds. It is better attuned to a relationally-absented unconscious than it is the rational or intimate. As such, the screen is not a natural medium of relational contact and suffers from its inability to touch.[7]

Body horror and psychological horror make sense in this context and extreme pornography inter-relates with these forms. In body horror, the body is forced to speak out in its garish disfiguration and thereby the body dominates the subject (see the film Martyrs, where it is pain leads to transcendence); in psychological horror, it is the nervous system which is forced up to dominate the body (see the film Suspiria where the highly eroticized horror takes place in a house which is the extended nervous system of its architect). Body horror exacerbates the body to make up for its absence; psychological horror uses juxtaposition and unconscious shadows to force out the nerves: a nervous texture that surrogates for intimacy. Extreme pornography endeavors towards similar functions in the obscenely over-productive, pornographic context. In this, it may go beyond a pure function of self-gratification, but may too contain a culturally symbolic and aesthetic value. It at least functions in accordance with the principles of a productive society."

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

It fits better on this topic, I think.


About the psychology of the cuck-ego and bitch-female:

There are different aspects in regards to the psychology of the bitch-female and the cuck-male; first off - the male:

There is a reason why the dickhead is shaped as a harpoon, it is a design to scrape away the competitor’s seed who had ejaculated in her orifice prior the one having sex with the woman already absorbed with semen of another. This automatically gives away female psychology, since the design is focused upon the tendencies of the female, who is by nature promiscuous, though in non-State sheltered times she uses tactics to keep the fertilizer stay and nurture / protect her and her offspring; today she has the option to be nurtured by the State.

Now, when a man has not seen his partner for a longer period of time, without him even being aware, his testicles will produce much more semen than when habitually exposed to his partner, when having sex with her – this is because the metabolic processes are designed in regards to relationships, to out-semen the possible rivals who had inseminated her during his time away. To see a male directly fuck your partner or another woman (hence porn works not only as an deceiving empathy-extension tool but also as a fabricator of semen by unconsciously noticing that you are not the penetrator but the cucky watcher) will produce a bigger amount of semen – pleasure-feeling when released.

Now, to see a woman, your partner belonging to your race, being penetrated by another male [with another racial background] intensifies his semen-production if he has a special-focused fetish (just like foot-fetish, or any other ‘’genre’’ not having a focus-point upon biological fertility traits), and if his value is solely determined by his partner – thus to see himself humiliated through means of his wife role-playing with another.

It has also to do with the inferiority / history of the racial-person involved, the change of when White couples who had negroid slaves, where having intercourse and did not stop their interactions once a black slave entered their bedroom to do his obligated tasks – because they did not see their black slaves as (potentially) equals but below their conceptual standards of humanity; the change towards artificially-propagated equality and the change of mind-set that the cuck-White-beta is taken out of his position of ‘’power’’ which he already did not biologically possess because he already is an inferior within his race, but is the deceptive setting of mind (‘’White privilege’’ etc.).

In regards to the woman being penetrated with her pathetic cuck partner watching, the female’s psychology in regards to having pleasure during sex, is dominantly determined by how much her partner has pleasure (men lead, women follow). Thus the female enjoys, in first instance, not because her partner is a total failure in every aspect, but because he is the one who enjoys his focused-fetish, his role of emasculation, powerless humiliation and the female [pretending] to have pleasure with another, but knowing the cuck enjoys makes her enjoy. Eventually, the psychology of the female is that of possessiveness, if she is not possessed by her partner, he has no jealousy (not to the extent that it will encourage her to make him more jealous, thus jealousy as a means of letting her know that he cares about her [owning one and another reflects each other’s value]) and self-respect by possessing her (protecting her from other males), then she feels disowned by her [former] partner and will seek another possessor, potentially the one humiliating her cuck.

So you see that there are different psychological, biological and historic aspects at play.


Additional during discussion:

It is like a live porn where you watch and not touch and even consciously seek gratification through humiliation. It all revolves around the woman determining your value and through this humiliate yourself by having her fucked by brutes.

This case, racial humiliation - there are different kinds of hatred, the unhealthy hatred is the one which connects to the saying "you become what you hate"; hence negro-centrics talk about enslaving Whites and using our women as sex slaves and Whites who hate negroes for what they essentially are (can I hate a rock for being a rock?), seek gratification by fucking black women, transsexuals or let their loved ones being fucked by negroes. Like that case of an American "neo-nazi" arrested when busted by the Police having sex with a black transsexual.

It is all about the feeling of dominating and being dominated - humiliated as the most degenerate possibility.

-You hate what you become; like in Syria where the Salafi-Sunnah Muslims slaughter those not in touch with their beliefs; to fight them is to become as them or perish / convert – but temporary.
-Another example is the obvious focus upon the women by the men who hate a specific race/tribe, that you get an desire to disown them from their man’s tribe by having sex with them. Hence the often used sexual slurs exchanged to each other such as with the Albanians and Serbs, Chechens and Russians, Turks and Armenians, blacks and Whites (this case more often from the side of the blacks, maybe to do that their women [and overall racial heritage] are the least desired).
-And then you have the hatred which gives sexual arousal not only by fucking the women of the hated tribe, but also being fucked by them.
With the exception of the first, these two branches of hatred I deem unhealthy.

-Then you have the hatred for an enemy which strengthens you; for what would I have been if I had no enemies who would have raised me whether they wanted it (noble) or not (cowards) – maybe a reflection of each other, degree of respect.
-The hatred of the world, to want to change it and the people – I used to hate the masses because I wanted them to live up to my ideals. Now I hate them not because I want to change them, but a hatred that I can inter-act with them but will always keep distance (in mind); a hatred as a coping mechanism to not be assimilated by the masses.

Also, knowing love through hatred – selection; I hate this than I love such.

-There is more at play than just biological mechanisms; it is about not just history but how we look upon history. What are we fed (resources), how, that we were dominant White supremacist maniacs who massacred and enslaved all that was in our way (non-Whites). What are we fed about our present status, that we maintain a White supremacist system. The inferior White-cuck enjoys the play of becoming what you hate (even though contraceptives are most often used), he sees his wife (or a woman of his racial heritage) being fucked and potentially inseminated by a negro who has slave ancestors, a race always at the bottom of the hierarchy and the cuck is fed that he is superior even though shrinking in demographics and cannot compete with the anti-White / anti-masculine system. Thus the sight of the ‘superior’ genetic legacy being potentially polluted with inferior genes through insemination, is what turns him on.
-As well the otherness, the contrast between the races, almost alike to bestiality if the former points do not apply.

WS Warthog wrote:

Also it occurred to me that cuckolding could be a way to experience homosexuality by proxy - or more likely to experience being a woman by proxy (if the cuckold has transgender inclinations). The cuckold imagines himself in the position of the woman by empathising with her. The desire to be cucked by a black would then simply be an expression of an attraction to blacks - which while still confusing to me is at least something I know to exist in the world among women.

Seeing past / superiority being potentially polluted by a negro fucking a White, turns them on; sexual arousal not only by fucking the women of the ''hated'' tribe, but also being fucked by them, women of your tribe as the extension of self.

Indeed, to emphasize with the woman as she belongs to the same genetic past of European ancestry, to see her womb polluted - to become the one who is penetrated in the ''heart of genetic legacy'' (womb) through fantastic-empathy.
White women and men belong to each other in the sense that only they can make White offspring, hence our higher degree of empathy for each other than another race (goes for all races) and the cuck's imagination that he is as well polluted by the bull.

I guess it is about the risk, just like in a rollercoaster where they simulate danger to feel adrenaline, alive, but all it is is pretence in a sheltered system. An outlet for those who want to feel danger but never will be. The risk of having a mongrel baby, even though it is just the sight; the cuck's imagination can pretend she will during the act.

WS Warthog wrote:

Could also be a boundary-violation thing. There might be a kind of psychological tax attached to carrying certain beliefs such as that blacks are inferior while simultaneously having to pretend all the time that you don't believe that. This would cause someone a lot of cognitive dissonance and discomfort, and the cuckolding thing might offer some kind of relief from the experience of dissonance - a kind of ritual confirmation of a delusion (much the same as "eating the body of Christ").

I keep it at hatred, risk, humilation, contrast. The four factors though affected by our current perspective upon history. And to not forget that a certain people who may not be mentioned are for a large part reponsible of propagating all sorts of poison in our collective-memory.
And of course the excesss of inferior Whites preserved and even propagated by the institutions of Morality (Judeo-Xtian /secular-humanist values).

Ws Warthog wrote:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The person writing that practically deifies cuckoldry, but basically explains it as a function of extreme empathy. I think that lends credence to the idea that it's a method of experiencing womanhood by proxy.

Indeed, the fifth factor as we spoke about earlier, fantastic-empathy

WS Warthog wrote:

The thing that confuses me is that I find it impossible to square the possibility of a negative thing as such being experienced as positive. Why should humiliation be enjoyable? There must be some mixture of positive and negative feelings and the problem is to find the structure of this mixture.

The empathic hypothesis is actually appealing for the reason that it doesn't require us to accept that sometimes up is down and down is up.

But then there are so many other sexual pathologies which does require this - scat, for example.

OhFortunae wrote:

There are different aspects in regards to the psychology of the bitch-female and the cuck-male; first off - the male:

There is a reason why the dickhead is shaped as a harpoon, it is a design to scrape away the competitor’s seed who had ejaculated in her orifice prior the one having sex with the woman already absorbed with semen of another. This automatically gives away female psychology, since the design is focused upon the tendencies of the female, who is by nature promiscuous, though in non-State sheltered times she uses tactics to keep the fertilizer stay and nurture / protect her and her offspring; today she has the option to be nurtured by the State.

Now, when a man has not seen his partner for a longer period of time, without him even being aware, his testicles will produce much more semen than when habitually exposed to his partner, when having sex with her – this is because the metabolic processes are designed in regards to relationships, to out-semen the possible rivals who had inseminated her during his time away. To see a male directly fuck your partner or another woman (hence porn works not only as an deceiving empathy-extension tool but also as a fabricator of semen by unconsciously noticing that you are not the penetrator but the cucky watcher) will produce a bigger amount of semen – pleasure-feeling when released.

Now, to see a woman, your partner belonging to your race, being penetrated by another male [with another racial background] intensifies his semen-production if he has a special-focused fetish (just like foot-fetish, or any other ‘’genre’’ not having a focus-point upon biological fertility traits), and if his value is solely determined by his partner – thus to see himself humiliated through means of his wife role-playing with another.

In addition...the cuckold having placed his wife on a pedestal, needs to reduce her to a level where he can find pleasure with her.
Usually in repressed societies where the man feels ashamed of wanting to be a man, using a replacement excludes him from the act.
If the partner is of a lower genetic social status then the act is to bring the female down to where he can unleash his own repressed sexuality upon her.

The female is returned to her rightful place, from atop the social pedestals she has been placed.
She's reunited with her nature, in the man's eyes.

If you haven't mastered self-control yet to not watch porn, this will encourage you to see through all the fakeness once you watch it, all the acting and cutting of scenes, feeling the presence of cameramen by realisation; but just do not watch it over 11:15, really, do not watch beyond that point.

Quote :

Desensitization is behind tolerance, which is the need for greater and greater stimulation to experience the same "high." Porn users often escalate to new genres as way to jack up their lagging dopamine. Novelty and violated expectations (surprise) increase dopamine.

Cuck's anti-White psychology exposed.

How ressentimental neo-marxists redefine surrender to pornography as the 'rebel's refusal to be educated' raw attitude as opposed to the 'privileged class':

Quote :

"Finally, we must take into account the possibility that a large part of pornography’s popularity lies in its refusal to be educated; it therefore has a large stake in celebrating delinquency and wayward or unauthorized behavior, and in this respect is akin to cultural forms like heavy metal music, whose definitive, utopian theme, after all, is ‘school’s out forever’. To refuse to be educated: to refuse to be taught lessons about maturity and adult responsibility, let alone about sexism and racism; to be naughty, even bad, but mostly naughty; to be on your worst behavior – all of this may be a ruse of patriarchy, a ruse of capitalism, but it also has something to do with a resistance to education, institutional or otherwise. It has something to do with a resistance to those whose patronizing power and missionary ardor are the privileges bestowed upon and instilled in them by a legitimate education. Surely there is a warning here for intellectuals who are committed today, as always, to ‘improving’ the sentimental education of the populace." [Matteo Pasquinelli, Animal Spirits: A Beastiary of the Commons]

This is Al Goldstein, he is responsible for normalizing porn. Think of him rubbing his hands and laughing at you every time you open an incognito window. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Anthony of Westgate (@orthodago) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]