What, the hell, is happening to females today? It's rare to find a female who is, truly, feminine. I believe that femininity is more than just physical attractiveness, just like masculinity is more than big muscles and cocks. We hear a lot about modern emasculation of males, but not so much about the de-feminization of females. I'd like to discuss modern de-feminization.
First thing I notice about females today is that many of them ( younger ones especially ) have no notion of self-control or restraint; they want to party all day, every day. They've become degenerates, hedonists. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against partying and having a good time, but in moderation.
Their personalities are more nasty, too - more brutish. I remember sitting in one of my classes in college and overhearing a couple of female students, casually, talking about the men they had sexual relations with. I thought it was some sort of prank at first, but it was legit. Harlotry is not uncommon in the West; the Judeo-Christian ethics have been kicked to the side in return for relativism, feminism, and other Left wing 'isms'. Female emancipation with no responsiblility, Pandora's box opened.
Lesbianization
Lesbianism and Bi-sexualism are rampant from my observations. A lot of these females dabbling in these sexual degeneracies are just doing so because they think it's ' hip ' and in style. They delude themselves into thinking they are, really, of that nature. The feminist movement is largely responsible for the promotion of lesbianism; many of us already know that feminists, in large, are misandric. What better way to stab at the male population than to turn their own females against them, make them sexually indifferent to them. Even their appearances are becoming more brutish, masculine, butch. It's a typical lesbian signature to have tattoos on the arms, short hair, dyed streak of hair near the bangs, and masculine apparel.
Satyr has dealt with this topic at length in his videos and on this forum.
I find it instructive and important to understand masculine and feminine psychology. Otto Weiniger's book is a good place to start. "Sex and Character"
"Shortly speaking the matter stands as follows: I have shown that logical and ethical phenomena come together in the conception of truth as the ultimate good, and posit the existence of an intelligible ego or a soul, as a form of being of the highest superempirical reality. In such a being as the absolute female there are no logical and ethical phenomena, and, therefore, the ground for the assumption of a soul is absent. The absolute female knows neither the logical nor the moral imperative, and the words law and duty, duty towards herself, are words which are least familiar to her. The inference that she is wanting in super-sensual personality is fully justified. The absolute female has no ego."
The decreasing power of paternalism and absent father figures in modern homes is another element to consider.
Finally, in Anthony Ludovici's book The choice of mate he talks of, I believe in late Hellenic culture, the homoerotic element influencing the ideal female form. Meaning selection for females with more masculine characteristics, such as longer legs and narrower hips...broader shoulders. This was imported into christian ideals and hence we have this sort of selection happening to this day. I believe this has greatly enhanced the memetic elements that are all the rage today.
Finally, in Anthony Ludovici's book The choice of mate ...
A very good book. He also talks about the influence of the Soul/Body split which has influenced the west in many forms, like in Christianity where the female, being particularly physical in her being was lead to believe that she should aspire to 'higher' callings and to leave the 'impure' body behind. Many steps towards a more masculine female.
While masculinity in males got watered down by not providing many avenues for an advantage. Muscles got replaced with petroleum, battles got more impersonal with a fire weapon, intelligence got replaced with education and so on.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37224 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
- Mutations permitted to propagate; increasing exponentially due to the compound effect of permitting earlier, unfit blood lines, to reproduce. When infertile couples are helped in passing on their genes, and genetic material can be purchased, as another commodity, the natural selection mechanism is replaced by social selection, furthering the artificiality of man's world.
As an indication of this, one cannot imply that sex and race have any value, except as a superficial skin making everyone unique, without immediately being attacked as a superficial bigot and a hater, and a sexist/racist, homophobe. Memetic auto-immune system, at work.
Appearance becomes a child's game that does not apply, and no matter your advantages you are expected to hide them or direct them to common interests, where the disadvantaged can also benefit from your advantage - and cynicism reigns supreme.
- Hyper-Masculinity also touches the female gender. As masculinity declines, or becomes cosmetic, in the psychological void left females enter to fill it. Behavior becomes an act - civility, sociability. Everyone is expected to remain within acceptable parameters. Behavior is faked. Pretense becomes a shared secret, where one competes with the other over who can fake it the best - the rise of the Hollywood actor as a mentor, an ideal, an inspiration. Plastic surgery, enhancing technologies, learned behaviors all become part of the big play. Amongst the inferior types, notice how the "hustler" and the "playa" become types to be emulated.
Modern man knows the other is faking it, and we admire how well he does it - see U.S. elections.
Therefore, if everything is pretense, then why not sexual types?
- The abstraction of masculinity into a symbol with no "teeth," and the institutionalization of maleness, where anyone can then become its representation, has made of appearances a superficiality. It is part of the code of the time: all appearances are shallow.
This implies that what you are can be worn like one wears a uniform...and then change the uniform to pretend to be something else...because underlying it all is a uniformity, of oneness, over which appearance is placed like an identity one chooses, or can purchase, or can construct on his/her own.
Feminization is also emasculating female pride in the same manner as male pride. Females realize more and more, today, that they don't need to give their virginity up to beta and lesser males. So what do young females do? They secure their virginity and sexuality by "giving it up" to other females. And females trust their own, more than males. Young girls are disillusioned by the feminization and emasculation of mankind. Females, especially young ones, have no alpha males or physical males worthy of their sexual value.
The MRA and MRM speak about this. Female sexuality is pricing many people, males and females both, completely out of the sexual market. Since the beautiful, sexy, gorgeous girls, have sexual value, and others do not.
Beauty is not equal.
Gender is not equal.
And the liberal, secular, humanist over evaluation of "equality" is drawing to an end. There is only so long you can push the "equality" myth before you face the blowback, the consequences for your errors.
Young, beautiful females have no alpha males to give themselves to. The virgins have no males worthy of their femininity. This is growing exponentially as male leadership shrinks and shrinks. There are no more "real men" anymore.
We hear this all the time, and experience it, here, on this forum, on ILP, across the internet, and in real life everyday.
Modernists today seem to forget that even the dirtiest of sluts still have standards.....
And these standards are rising higher from year to year, pushing out a lot of genetic feces. A lot of males, and females, are getting priced out of the sex market.
I expect that we're going to see a huge rise of female homosexuality and bisexuality in the decades to come, as females reform themselves into harems and congregations of women only groups. A group of beautiful females is much more powerful than a loner beauty. And social hierarchies form around female beauty.
Female beauty is really the foundation and bedrock of societies and culture.
This fact is most obvious by sub cultural groups where young girls dress a certain way, think "emo goth chicks", and attract certain types of males, including some types, but excluding others.
This is "memetic selection" to coincide with natural selection.
Species represents type. Culture and sub culture is the extension of this biological division.
I think this is a positive reaction to liberalism.
Instead of young girls giving themselves, and forced to submit to lesser, inferior, faggot males....young girls have a new option. They retain their virginity, chastity, innocence, and value, by submitting to another, butch, masculine female. The dykes protect the sanctity and value of the beautiful, gorgeous, more feminine female.
Her value raises, not lowers.
Lesbianism is good for females. Homosexuality is very, very bad for males.
I think this is a positive reaction to liberalism.
Instead of young girls giving themselves, and forced to submit to lesser, inferior, faggot males....young girls have a new option. They retain their virginity, chastity, innocence, and value, by submitting to another, butch, masculine female. The dykes protect the sanctity and value of the beautiful, gorgeous, more feminine female.
Her value raises, not lowers.
Lesbianism is good for females. Homosexuality is very, very bad for males.
I think some of this has to do with females having bad experiences with males, such as their fathers and ex-boyfriends. Some sort of fear or resentment lingers in them, so they opt for the other gender. They want their female partners to resemble males, to appear masculine. But not, actually, be masculine, that is to say, male.
A lot of the genetic feces of modernity understands their situation on an instinctive level. The only hope some young females have, is to work their way up a social ladder. Females latch onto males, who are encouraged to move "up" in society. Upward social mobility, this is what females demand, from males. This upward mobility encourages cultural enlightenment and also caste hierarchy.
Just as there is male genetic filth, there is also female genetic filth. Many females are born from degenerate fathers, and have degenerate brothers as well, like you say.
This also encourages young girls to "give it up" to other females, the butch lesbians, dykes.
There is more worth and value for them there, a recourse. A push in the only direction available. Because they have no outlets in life, otherwise. No value elsewhere.
Homosexuality is a matter of population control and the neutralization of excess males that otherwise can't find a female mate or partner.
The top strata of the global elite believe that the world is going through overpopulation and that only their genetics have the right to reproduce via ideological eugenics.
So, of course they're about promoting something like that of homosexuality where there is zero population growth by its adherents of constructed lifestyle.
As we all know the sexual libido of men makes us violent and competitive in trying to acquire a sexual mate of the opposite sex. Of course with the poor male working class there isn't that many females that want to mate with them for socio economic reasons thus homosexuality is pushed upon the poor male working class as a way of controlling their sexual libido in a directed confined manner but also as a way of reducing their overall population numbers overtime simultaneously.
With homosexual females from my experience, almost all of them have some sort of psychological trauma or mental character defect that directs their decision in becoming lesbian. That also falls into line with the eugenic initiative.
A majority of homosexuality is directed towards the lower working classes.
Very rarely will you see examples of it anywhere else.
This hatred of youth may be an expression of regret towards their younger self that made the wrong choices and invested in lies.
This is why they deny free-will, absolutely, and mock it because it fails to prove itself absolutely free. They need to be victims - innocent, and worthy of pity or a second chance or worthy of their resentful vengeance.
Nietzsche's 'eternal return' a metaphysical prison none can escape or change. Shame keeping the innocent inmates imprisoned, because to even think of escape is to prove that you do not like what and where you are. It makes Abrahamic 'primordial sin', unnecessary. Sinfulness is transferred form the past to the present.
