Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalFAQMemberlistSearchRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 About Love

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3
AuthorMessage
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: About Love Mon May 27, 2013 9:57 pm

No. Do Go primp. Although I've heard biting can be engaging.....I've only "heard" mind you. Probably wouldn't be something I would "Love"....There used it again.

I found your comments on the upper 1% - 5% of women and their mate choices interesting.....back-when I had read The Myth of Monogamy and Eve at Dawn . Then further on I found the comments between the "gals" engaging.

Back to top Go down
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14003
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: About Love Mon May 27, 2013 11:01 pm

The "gals"?

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: About Love Tue May 28, 2013 3:31 pm

Well Yah.

The Goodly Queen E. and Lyssa the Lizard Lady.
Back to top Go down
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 1944
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 33
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: About Love Thu May 30, 2013 12:27 pm

The following is titled

Abandon Hope

by Ogre Littletroll


"Woman is not human. Not in the sense we know. Although they resemble humans and mimic some of our behavior, Woman is more like a snake with tits and an ass.

They live according to a different set of rules than what we would consider fair and ethical. Woman acts and speaks according to whatever suits her emotional needs in the moment; and in doing so, anything is fair game. Lying, cheating, betrayal, nagging, and various forms of cruelty are all acceptable, provided that she feels her actions are justified, but regardless of how absurd her criteria for justification may be. Breaking appointments is perfectly acceptable and require no explanation.

Woman desires power. She may want to be equal to Man but she desires what is superior to her. Woman is constantly at odds with herself; she wants what she can't have; and when she gets what she wants she no longer wants it.

Woman is a whore; this is her natural state. She wants to be ravaged like a piece of meat; she wants to be violated; to be raped, to be sodomized. She is vile and perverted. Woman despises herself, and although she may want respect, she despises those who yield it to her.

Man is an emotional creature; affectionate, loyal, loving, fair and just. This is his natural state. Men who are not like this have only learned to become so through emulating the behavior of Woman, or have otherwise become corrupted due to emotional abuse.

Woman has the ability to do Man great emotional harm. Woman takes delight in manipulating the emotions of men so as to cause us anger, frustration, confusion, profound sadness and blind rage. She does this, whether knowingly or not, to test the emotional fortitude and power of men, to measure her own power, to feed her ego, to validate herself, or many other reasons. At no time does she feels her actions are immoral, no matter how cruel they may be. If the man retaliates, in an attempt to safeguard his emotional well-being, it is, in our legal system, a prosecutable crime.

But herein lies insight to understanding woman's desire. As previously stated, Woman desires what is superior to her. If a woman can control a thing, she is superior to it, and ergo does not desire of it. If she cannot control it, it must therefore be superior, and ergo she feels desire for it. This explains why Woman will do things which seem cruel to us, but to her, it is only her way of testing a man's desirability, although she may not be aware of this consciously.

Woman desires what she cannot have. She is attracted to married men, homosexual men, and the otherwise "taken", and may go to great extremes to sabotage a man's bonds with another so that she may have him to herself. Such a man is difficult to emotionally manipulate, since his needs are already met. Woman must go to great lengths to win him over. The greater the effort she must make, the more she desires him. Woman desires a challenge.

But the man who is single and available, willing and ready, this she finds repulsive. There goes a man who is free for the taking; to have and to hold; loyal and true; Woman regards him with disgust.

The single man truly has a dilemma. The single man is lonely; and as such is emotionally frail and vulnerable; he is easily manipulated by Woman and ergo undesirable. The very thing he needs to cure him of his vulnerability is the thing he cannot attain; and the greater his need, the more unattainable it becomes.

So then, what can such a man do?

A man must extinguish his desires, as in the Buddhist way of non-attachment. Buddhism states that desire is the cause of suffering; nowhere is this more obvious than in the case of the single man. If you desire something it has power over you; and if it is a woman you desire then she has that power; the very power that, once yielded to her, repels her.

The single man must give her NOTHING.

This is easier said than done, however. Woman is clever. It is only a matter of time before she finds a way to push through your cool exterior, drops your defenses, makes you feel safe, reaches in and pulls out your carefully guarded innate desire. (The so-called "inner wuss".)

And when that happens, she suddenly drops your sorry ass like a rock.

And the closer you got to attaining your desire, the harder was the fall.

Ultimately, what is the goal? Is the goal for the single man to acquire the thing that he desires? Actually, no. The goal is for the single man to acquire emotional well-being. He must safeguard this well-being above all else. How does he do this? By not sticking his neck out, or his head up, or his dick out, or his heart on his sleeve, however you want to put it, in harms way, where it can get cut off. And the only way to avoid a fall is to stay down.

The one thing that causes the single man's downfall, every time, is hope. The deluded belief that this time it will be better; this time it will be different; this time it's going to work out. Once he feels hope, he suddenly exposes himself emotionally, and, with penis flapping about in the wind for all to see, happily hands Woman his testicles so that she can gleefully crush them.

Do I propose that the single man simply not approach Woman? Not at all.

I suggest that he may do so, but only with the thought in mind that he will be rejected. Not might, but will, without doubt. If not today, then tomorrow. In effect, he has already been rejected even before approaching her. That being the case, she can't hurt him – he is already dead. Although he may find her desirable, he hopes for nothing, and expects nothing. Without expectation, he is free to interact with the woman and let that interaction run it's course, wherever it goes. The man must suppress any delusion of hope. It is a mental discipline. In effect all he must do is not yield to the temptation to place his emotional well-being in harm's way.

This is nothing new; I am only adapting the philosophy of the Resolute Acceptance of Death. The warrior goes into battle knowing he is already dead; therefore he has nothing to fear. In the same way, the single man engages a woman knowing he has already been rejected.

If the single man is going to feel anything it should be fear. Not fear of rejection, but the fear of a person who can cause him great emotional harm. Here is someone who can hurt him and should be regarded as an opponent in battle. This man must face his fear and engage his opponent. She will try to raise his hopes. She does this whether knowingly or not; she may be testing him; she may just want to validate her own ego, to test her own power.

A taken man is impervious to her machinations; there is already another woman, or perhaps many women in his life, that draw his emotional attention away from her. But the single man does not have this advantage. It is not enough to require of the single man to free himself of desires; sooner or later, Woman will find them. The single man must have something as his focus, his anchor, his center, to keep from straying into harm's way. What the single man has is rejection. He has his long history of failure as proof in validation of his pessimism. As long as he keeps this constant thought in the center of his interaction with her, he will remain serene, focused, and impervious to Woman's manipulations. He must remain confident in his own pessimism.

I then put forth the possibility, hypothetically speaking, that in doing so, the single man, being of serene and focused mind, emotionally impenetrable, free of attachment, centered and disciplined, may start to appear desirable to Woman. And as her efforts to break his focus continuously fail, she will grow frustrated and try even harder. Thusly the seeds of attraction are sown within her and shall begin to grow into desire."
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 1944
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 33
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: About Love Thu May 30, 2013 12:56 pm

All a bit black and white but there are some good points in it.

Ogre wrote:
Man is an emotional creature; affectionate, loyal, loving, fair and just. This is his natural state. Men who are not like this have only learned to become so through emulating the behavior of Woman, or have otherwise become corrupted due to emotional abuse.

Here he shows an us versus them kind of call for unification among men. That whole part is very feminine.

Throughout the whole text seeths quite a lot of resentment and frustration, unresolved anger.

I am myself usually quite angry about myself whenever I am angry or filled with hatred. It's because I am thinking that feeling those emotions for someone or about something grants that other person/thing a lot of power over me. So, I try to only allow myself having those emotions when I deem the other worthy of receiving them.

To counter anger and frustration for things I don't deem worthy, my experience taught me that it works quite well to detatch oneself as much as possible from the influence of that person/thing. Or in other words to reduce the importance of said thing.

There is, again..., a difference between the feminine and the masculine in that regard. The feminine wants to affirm those emotions, experience love and hate to the fullest. One does love and hate that, which has power over oneself. The masculine does inspire those emotions. But it's a struggle, it must be, otherwise if the man were absolutely masculine all interactivity would cease to take place.


Last edited by Anfang on Thu May 30, 2013 4:09 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile
perpetualburn

avatar

Gender : Male Posts : 934
Join date : 2013-01-04
Location : MA

PostSubject: Re: About Love Thu May 30, 2013 3:23 pm

Quote :
I suggest that he may do so, but only with the thought in mind that he will be rejected. Not might, but will, without doubt. If not today, then tomorrow. In effect, he has already been rejected even before approaching her. That being the case, she can't hurt him – he is already dead. Although he may find her desirable, he hopes for nothing, and expects nothing. Without expectation, he is free to interact with the woman and let that interaction run it's course, wherever it goes. The man must suppress any delusion of hope. It is a mental discipline. In effect all he must do is not yield to the temptation to place his emotional well-being in harm's way.

This is nothing new; I am only adapting the philosophy of the Resolute Acceptance of Death. The warrior goes into battle knowing he is already dead; therefore he has nothing to fear. In the same way, the single man engages a woman knowing he has already been rejected.

This is surely better than going in with high hopes and expectations, but it's not the best advice. You should engage women with incredibly high expectations while at the same time knowing she is just a means, no mater how intoxicating she is, that rejection makes no difference because you're secure one way or another. It's important that you don't dismiss her intoxicating quality, or play mind games with yourself that you're "already dead" because that's not the most attractive way of being... you need to command the high tension that results from wanting her more than anything, knowing that you may or may not be ok.... In fact, you might break if she rejects you and you might not be ok, because it's part of the gamble. Your honesty demands that you consider all possibilities without any internal "safeguards" like being "already dead." You need to be able to maintain composure while considering and feeling the extent of all possibilities. In this way you appear the most powerful. If you're "already dead" where is the energy to take and ravage her? You remain secure and ok even with rejection because everything just serves to make you stronger... You know this ahead of time but still acknowledge the possibility of breaking which causes tension that requires masculine reason to resolve. Existing in a state of harnessed tension... she senses all that tense energy inside you, but there's a calm clarity in your eyes. Thus you appear as being able to satisfy her intellectually and sexually.

Quote :

If the single man is going to feel anything it should be fear. Not fear of rejection, but the fear of a person who can cause him great emotional harm. Here is someone who can hurt him and should be regarded as an opponent in battle. This man must face his fear and engage his opponent. She will try to raise his hopes. She does this whether knowingly or not; she may be testing him; she may just want to validate her own ego, to test her own power.

This is a little misguided. A woman is more of a plaything than an opponent. Yes she might break you, so you might be tempted to say she's an "opponent"... Men can be both incredibly strong and frail at the same time, and playing with a woman really tests this... "The true man wants two things: danger and play. For that reason he wants woman, as the most dangerous plaything.”

Quote :
Ultimately, what is the goal? Is the goal for the single man to acquire the thing that he desires? Actually, no. The goal is for the single man to acquire emotional well-being. He must safeguard this well-being above all else. How does he do this? By not sticking his neck out, or his head up, or his dick out, or his heart on his sleeve, however you want to put it, in harms way, where it can get cut off. And the only way to avoid a fall is to stay down.

Man is very emotional, but the goal shouldn't be to acquire and "safe-guard" his fragile emotional state from woman. "Playing it safe" is cowardly, and women will most likely see through your feigned "indifference."

Quote :
Woman desires power. She may want to be equal to Man but she desires what is superior to her. Woman is constantly at odds with herself; she wants what she can't have; and when she gets what she wants she no longer wants it.

A man should have goals and aspirations that go beyond the need of women so that once the man has her, he doesn't become sexually or emotionally needy... she remains a means. He remains unattainable.

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 1944
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 33
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: About Love Thu May 30, 2013 4:31 pm

perpetualburn wrote:
Man is very emotional, but the goal shouldn't be to acquire and "safe-guard" his fragile emotional state from woman. "Playing it safe" is cowardly, and women will most likely see through your feigned "indifference."

Hmm, "Playing it safe", like cutting off a part of oneself which likes (needs) to interact with the feminine in a dangerous way?

I'd consider it an immense loss but then again it depends on what one values or needs a lot.
Yet, I do know some men who are "aloof" not because they "play it safe" or because they feign their "aloofness" to play their dangerous game but because they Are aloof, not interested in that kind of interactivity.

I imagine that to be ultimately a disappointment for the woman, I think, I would be. It's like being a cat, waiting in front of a mousehole and after playing that game, it turns out that there was no mouse inside, in the first place.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 1944
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 33
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: About Love Tue Jun 04, 2013 9:04 pm

Love and hunger...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 9035
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

PostSubject: Re: About Love Fri Jun 07, 2013 6:41 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I love you tongue

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 1944
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 33
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: About Love Sat Aug 10, 2013 4:43 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"...That is the nature of the chemical imperative to procreate..."
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: About Love

Back to top Go down
 
About Love
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 3 of 3Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3
 Similar topics
-
» HOW MUCH DO YOU LOVE ME?
» O LOVE DIVINE BY DERROL SAWYER
» What is the Law of LOVe ?
» What is your response to Gods love today?
» Father's Love Letter to You

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: