Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalFAQMemberlistSearchRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 gender and this site

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next
AuthorMessage
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: gender and this site Sat Aug 24, 2013 7:15 pm

Why is so much of this place dedicated to gender roles? I have never seen a philosophy site so intent on the subject, perhaps I am missing something?
Back to top Go down
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 15229
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Sat Aug 24, 2013 7:36 pm

We are focused on all aspects of modern nihilism.

The three most popular Liberal lies are those concerning sex, and race.
Sex has two parts:
Homosexuality and masculine/feminine specialized roles.  

One more reason is that feminization is occurring, where the preferred sexual traits are feminine ones.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Sat Aug 24, 2013 10:04 pm

...because us men are sexist evil pigs who can't get laid, we are also angry and hate women because we have been excessively rejected, and now we want revenge!!! ...we also have small penises..

But of course, it has nothing to do with women being generally retarded.
Back to top Go down
apaosha
Daeva
avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 1599
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 31
Location : Ireland

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Sat Aug 24, 2013 11:18 pm

Satyr wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
That's in the Adyton. You should move it to the Agora if you want her to read it.

_________________
"I do not exhort you to work but to battle; I do not exhort you to peace but to victory. May your work be a battle; may your peace be a victory." -TSZ
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://knowthyself.forumotion.net
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 15229
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:53 am

apaosha wrote:
Satyr wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
That's in the Adyton. You should move it to the Agora if you want her to read it.
I forgot about that.
Thanks.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Sun Aug 25, 2013 1:35 pm

Interesting work. After reading, should you not be applauding this very natural cycle of species survival and evolution? You seem to think that what is happening harms those like you but, it does not follow. When species become too many it is natural that its society implodes as you describe. The fall of so many as you see will lead to the dominance of the strongest, healthiest and most intelligent. Really with your obvious studies you should know this. With your distaste of this occurance, you should be elated. So why are you not happy about it?
Back to top Go down
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 9035
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Sun Aug 25, 2013 4:07 pm

mannequin wrote:
...because us men are sexist evil pigs who can't get laid, we are also angry and hate women because we have been excessively rejected, and now we want revenge!!! ...we also have small penises..

But of course, it has nothing to do with women being generally retarded.
The hatred of one extreme usually leaves one desiring the other extreme.

How important is it to you, to survive at all costs, even if it means, bringing your own kind down in the process, the inevitability of a homo-sensuality or homo-agape you promote owing to current feminism and feminization?
If there's a hole, you suggest making it larger than stitching it - how is that not a self-hating decadence?

This reminds me to question how we define self-love.
To gift ourselves anything to preserve ourselves, our sanity intact at the cost of self-esteem - is this self-love?
If not, does self-love even matter before survival?

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 2102
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 34
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Sun Aug 25, 2013 5:51 pm

Lyssa wrote:
To gift ourselves anything to preserve ourselves, our sanity intact at the cost of self-esteem - is this self-love?
For me, self-esteem is very closely related to self-love. Maybe it is self-love.
Self-confidence is a matter of experience. Making experiences while having good self-esteem at the time.
I don't know how to fill missing self-esteem. Haven't thought about it much. Maybe making friends with undesired parts of the self.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 15229
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Sun Aug 25, 2013 6:01 pm

Pretzle wrote:
Interesting work. After reading,  should you not be applauding this very natural cycle of species survival and evolution? You seem to think that what is happening harms those like you but, it does not follow. When species become too many it is natural that its society implodes as you describe. The fall of so many as you see will lead to the dominance of the strongest, healthiest and most intelligent. Really with  your obvious studies you should know this. With your distaste of this occurance, you should be elated. So why are you not happy about it?
I am neither happy nor unhappy. I am describing a phenomenon in a way that opposes the popular narrative.

This is about a meme: a sum of morals, ideals, attitudes towards life.

This is dying.

If the extintion of humankind does not bother you, because life goes on, and bacteria will survive, then you must be reducing yourself to the least-common-denominator to find pride. 

I aim higher.
I rejoice when something low is surpassed, not when something high is degraded.

You also fail to see the bigger picture.
Are you a simpleton?

Try to follow:
If the masculine spirit is what challenges and resists and opposes, then science and philosophy and creativity can be seen as manifestations of this spirit.
Declining masculinity means declining intelligence, imagination, creativity, thinking outside the box, confronting the world, not surrendering to it, questioning authority and ideas etc.

Now look around you.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Sun Aug 25, 2013 8:30 pm

Lyssa wrote:
mannequin wrote:
...because us men are sexist evil pigs who can't get laid, we are also angry and hate women because we have been excessively rejected, and now we want revenge!!! ...we also have small penises..

But of course, it has nothing to do with women being generally retarded.
The hatred of one extreme usually leaves one desiring the other extreme.

How important is it to you, to survive at all costs, even if it means, bringing your own kind down in the process, the inevitability of a homo-sensuality or homo-agape you promote owing to current feminism and feminization?
If there's a hole, you suggest making it larger than stitching it - how is that not a self-hating decadence?

This reminds me to question how we define self-love.
To gift ourselves anything to preserve ourselves, our sanity intact at the cost of self-esteem - is this self-love?
If not, does self-love even matter before survival?
Do a lustful vampire ponder on the definition of self-love surrounded by blood filled humans.

The life I lead, you think self-esteem is a factor for me, a requirement?  To acquire confidence through the expression of self-love in a creative form to impact a favorable response, is it not then the value of self equates to a worthiness that can be appreciated by others, an acceptance.

Are you looking for a home lyssa?

Is a man with a lower functioning libido more loyal and committed to his wife than a cheating man with a high functioning libido?

Mannequins don't hold identities. I'm dead like casper without the friendliness.

Isn't the blankness of the mannequin on display for all to see fashioned in the current socially acceptable clothing at the time.

Look a little closer at those mannequins and they'll smile at you.
For now, ill stand behind the window with the rest of them.

Completely hopeless? Not quite.

My presence here signifies that. I return from time to time. Like a religious man who wanders the graveyard using the opportunity to get closer to god.

Only there is no god, or wander for me. Just the grave. I don't cry anymore, I don't look to the sky anymore..

Do you think they'll make a mistake when they carve the lettering on your epitaph?
Back to top Go down
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 9035
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:16 am

Anfang wrote:
Lyssa wrote:
To gift ourselves anything to preserve ourselves, our sanity intact at the cost of self-esteem - is this self-love?
For me, self-esteem is very closely related to self-love. Maybe it is self-love.
Then it must be death before dishonour for you.
For some, its a question of survival and self-preservation - pagan converts to Xtianity.
Would you kneel before a bishop, or would you rather have your head chopped off because of self-esteem?
Is it life at any cost, or only a dignified, principled life that is worth living?

Quote :
I don't know how to fill missing self-esteem. Haven't thought about it much. Maybe making friends with undesired parts of the self.
Posit a goal; see what's stopping you from within yourself, in getting there and work on it.
Not making friends, making home for even what's undesired, which requires self-exposure. If you don't know your own blue print, the design of your being, how are you going to "fit" it in a suitable place and determine its value? How do you determine self-worth?

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 9035
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Mon Aug 26, 2013 9:16 am

mannequin wrote:

Do a lustful vampire ponder on the definition of self-love surrounded by blood filled humans.
So you see yourself as a lusty parasite than a predator?

Quote :
The life I lead, you think self-esteem is a factor for me, a requirement?  To acquire confidence through the expression of self-love in a creative form to impact a favorable response, is it not then the value of self equates to a worthiness that can be appreciated by others, an acceptance.
Why - "impact a favourable response"? Have not the best and creative philosophers died infamously, notoriously, hated, mocked, caricatured as outsiders even after death? When has people's rejection or acceptance mattered to a self-esteeming soul? Does the creator create for the pleasure of his audience? What does that make him, if not a third-rate...!

Quote :

Are you looking for a home lyssa?
No, I am not.

Quote :

Is a man with a lower functioning libido more loyal and committed to his wife than a cheating man with a high functioning libido?
That is a truth. But why does the lusty one ruled by pure animal pleasure, not finding satiation even with copulating with lots of women, then men, then children, then animals, corpses, what not,, content to exist as a parasite, not lust after himself? Is it not because he is undesirable to himself?
Self-organization demands energy; looking within can be a nightmare; the survival instinct of a weak and exhausted will tends to live a self-degrading life than disciplining itself, regulating that lust, raising oneself up, finding methods and strengthening its will to stop its self-depletion.
This is a picture of the american economy.
Why is this so?
Because self-exploitation, to extricate what we need from our own self, and being honest with what reflects from within us - affirming it is so painful, one's survival depends on turning away from it.

I was watching World War Z some weeks back. What does one do when parasitic zombies start attacking? The film's solution was "make yourself sick"; because parasites only attack healthy hosts.
The way to avoid parasites is to become ill oneself.

How enticing and logical the message of that film sounds.

One would be insane as Nietzsche was, to suggest cultivate such great health, enough to make any parasitic depletion insignificant...
scatter away vampires with the brilliance of one's daylight...

The path of least resistance will always be the more attractive one to the hedonists, because it pains less, and so costs less.


Quote :

Mannequins don't hold identities. I'm dead like casper without the friendliness.

Isn't the blankness of the mannequin on display for all to see fashioned in the current socially acceptable clothing at the time.

Look a little closer at those mannequins and they'll smile at you.
For now, ill stand behind the window with the rest of them.

Completely hopeless? Not quite.

My presence here signifies that. I return from time to time. Like a religious man who wanders the graveyard using the opportunity to get closer to god.

Only there is no god, or wander for me. Just the grave. I don't cry anymore, I don't look to the sky anymore..

Do you think they'll make a mistake when they carve the lettering on your epitaph?
I know.
And you write very poignant lines for a "dead one"...

Who's recognition are you waiting for? Are you incapable of making your own world, your own sky, your own sun?
And if there is an oil spill in the sea and dead species floating, does one dump more garbage and corrupt the environment even further?
If there's a heap of dirt in your living room, do you turn it into a charity sewer?
If women have turned mongrels and men are turning effete, do you de-dignify yourself and whatever trace of masculinity remains to surrender to life because you can't fight it? If you can't fight it, you join it? How does spreading more chaos and resigning to entropy, promise any "hope" for the not-yet-hopeless?

Self-esteem seems to kick up when trying to marry a horrible female and attempting to mould a child through one's ideals; one would sooner have no self-esteem and resign to entropy and spread an all-levelling corruption,,, a desert of the real, than have self-esteem and deal with an ugly woman. To prompt a slow suicide appears more healthy and logical, than bleeding from a thousand paper-cuts everyday at the hands of some nightmarish woman...
But isn't life a woman too? which makes living like casper such a perverse irony...

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 2102
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 34
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Mon Aug 26, 2013 5:19 pm

Lyssa wrote:
Would you kneel before a bishop, or would you rather have your head chopped off because of self-esteem?
I should have written 'To me' not 'For me'. The words self-esteem and self-love have a very similar meaning in my view. But let's expose my self in that scenario with the bishop.
It's not an either or decision. In my experience - certain things I'll accept and others I won't - it's not only depending on the thing itself though but also on my state of mind, which parts of myself are being dominant at the moment, how my decisions impact others who I feel, I have a responsibility towards. It's depending on the moment.

Quote :
Is it life at any cost, or only a dignified, principled life that is worth living?
Dignified by whom? If there is felt slight then there is a felt slight, I'm not interested in a bargaining or a rational approach. But I am about effectiveness - I don't want to display outrage without potency. If I can't retaliate in the now then I'll bide my time. It's not even all conscious - What I have to do, I'll do - what I don't have to do, I won't. I think that, not following this would make me ill, would make my body ill. The ideal would be to always try hard to follow the demands of the self - do I do that all the time? - No. But I'm trying - to be more focused. To give room to all aspects.

Quote :
Not making friends, making home for even what's undesired, which requires self-exposure.
Tomaito - Tomatoh ... But yes, it explains it much better. Self-exposure puts it out there and the outside world becomes the reminder of those 'undesired aspects' forcing an individual to engage them, to not forget them. When I say that I haven't thought about it much then it doesn't mean that I haven't worked out certain 'undesired' parts of my self already. It just means that I have no explanatory framework to put it on paper, in theory. Though, you've made me realize certain things, again - remembering.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Mon Aug 26, 2013 5:56 pm

"I am neither happy nor unhappy. I am describing a phenomenon in a way that opposes the popular narrative.

This is about a meme: a sum of morals, ideals, attitudes towards life.

This is dying.

If the extintion of humankind does not bother you, because life goes on, and bacteria will survive, then you must be reducing yourself to the least-common-denominator to find pride."


(How do you see a trillion humans dying? Short of this planet exploding or the sun going nova, humans are here to stay. The ARKS being constructed on every continent assures it. Knowledge and biomaterial are being stored in each for repopulation of humans and animals. Along with plants, insects, germs etc. All to create a strong ecosystem. )


"I aim higher. I rejoice when something low is surpassed, not when something high is degraded.

You also fail to see the bigger picture. Are you a simpleton?"

(I see the bigger picture quite well)

"Try to follow: If the masculine spirit is what challenges and resists and opposes, then science and philosophy and creativity can be seen as manifestations of this spirit. Declining masculinity means declining intelligence, imagination, creativity, thinking outside the box, confronting the world, not surrendering to it, questioning authority and ideas etc.

Now look around you."


Your words: " If the masculine spirit"
If is the big word here. I see women stepping into those niches as easily as any man. You do not. So again : You and your fellows with your females should rejoice at the downfall of the feminized masses. This will leave room for you to build as you see fit. Surely you do not think emasculated males can be reconverted?
Your group will breed humans to your criteria. Of course inbreeding
will occur but, damages can be minimized by the removal of damaged infants. You and yours will rule. Is this objectionable? Is this not the purpose of you? Recruitment of proper sperm and ovaries? I have read your threads although there are petty ones that are undignified that malign others on other forums. But, emotional needs must be met somehow even negative ones. Hate is a survival trait afterall.
I find I must disagree about female abilities. Physical strength is a main difference aside from genitalia and hormones. The brain really shows no difference. A human is taught how to use their brain. Yes some have natural abilities that surpass the average and there are those that are below. Other than physical size and hormones the existing human is equal no matter the gender. Unless you have multiple unbiased brain scan studies to prove otherwise? One or two cannot count as definitive. A group of 10 will suffice as probable.
Back to top Go down
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 15229
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Mon Aug 26, 2013 6:18 pm

Pretzle wrote:

(How do you see a trillion humans dying? Short of this planet exploding or the sun going nova,  humans are here to stay. The ARKS being constructed on every continent assures it. Knowledge and biomaterial are being stored in each for repopulation of humans and animals. Along with plants, insects, germs etc. All to create a strong ecosystem. )
I depends on how you define human.
A brain-dead zombie, can be called human.

I have a more precise definition, other than species identity which, ironically, is a sexual category.


Pretzle wrote:
Your words: " If the masculine spirit"
If is the big word here. I see women stepping into those niches as easily as any man. You do not. So again : You and your fellows with your females should rejoice at the downfall of the feminized masses. This will leave room for you to build as you see fit. Surely you do not think emasculated males can be reconverted?
What I see is monkeys with enough intelligence to work the machinery already invented for them.

I see recipe books, peer support, and precedent.
Strap a gun to a chick's hips and she's John Wayne.
Then boys cower before her.
How strong she is when another invents the device to compensate for the absence of balls.


I've heard memetic inbreeding causes the worse genetic deformities.

Fuck a gorilla, dear, you want those genes in the gene pool.
Dilute that human gene pool with some primate blood.
Something special will come of it.
It's good for ya.
I will not judge you.
I'll know, and comment, but my modern Secular Christian ethos forbids me from judging you and what you do in the bedroom.


Pretzle wrote:
You and yours will rule. Is this objectionable? Is this not the purpose of you? Recruitment of proper sperm and ovaries? I have read your threads although there are petty ones that are undignified that malign others on other forums. But, emotional needs must be met somehow even negative ones. Hate is a survival trait afterall.
Justifying the status quo is also emotionally rewarding.


Pretzle wrote:
I find I must disagree about female abilities. Physical strength is a main difference aside from genitalia and hormones. The brain really shows no difference.
I know, that's why human science, philosophy, innovation, creativity in all fields are so dominated by females.

Thanks for teaching me that evolution, for some inexplicable reason, only affects the body, but not the brain.
I suppose intelligence just occurs spontaneously.
No natural selection involved.

I would love for you to explain how intelligence evolves and why it is such a dominating trait if it is uniformly distributed.

You know, social factors can only take you so far when looking for excuses to explain away thousands of years of history.
Then you have to wonder why before there was a social structure of our Paternalistic kind, nothing creative occurred in the female brain.

And please give me the typical exceptions to the rule which still do not manage to be equal to what we call genius.
women are good supportive elements.
They perverse, nurture to its fullest potential, what is given to them.

Some few of them can be placed on the higher 10% of total human intelligence, making then superior than the average male.
But potential is about the highest probable point.

When I say that Negros are intellectually inferior to Europeans, I don't only have history behind me - which your kind must explain away with excuses - but I have Evolution Theory on my side.
I am not advocating violence, cruelty or anything. I am saying that this bloodline, a product of genetic isolation made obvious by appearance, has a lower, no average, potential for intelligence As I define it.
Proven by history. Thousand of years of it.    

In this area you have only Jared Diamond to draw from.
Go for it.

Pretzle wrote:

A human is taught how to use their brain.
Indeed, and we call that training.

The education system churning out females by the droves -let us put it to the test, and watch for the next cognitive revolution from the up-and-comnig female geniuses.

Here's another way of seeing it:
We are also trained how NOT to use our brains.
Between the do and do not, we get this fine world of mediocrity, where females are just as brilliant as males.

Quote :
Pretzle wrote:
Yes some have natural abilities that surpass the average and there are those that are below. Other than physical size and hormones the existing human is equal no matter the gender. Unless you have multiple unbiased brain scan studies to prove otherwise? One or two cannot count as definitive. A group of 10 will suffice as probable.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

What's interesting about your position is that it validates mine.
Here you are requiring institutional validation to explain what is obvious, while you ignore reality itself.

You must ask yourself:
In modern science, who funds the work?
Are scientists free to explore any direction they wish?

Having answered this - I'm sure you will be using a very popular method - then proceed to explain why men dominate.
 Why Paternalsim?
If domination is chance, then what you are saying is that evolution is about luck.

Why are the creative arts, revolutionary ideas, explorations, thinking outside the box, always have a masculine source?

The "women were in a box", and the "glass ceiling" excuse, falls short.

But, let's put it to the test:
Let's wait for the next revolutionary thought, that expands human thinking, by shattering our established beliefs, to come from a female.

Brain test:
Imagine a world with no rules, no laws, no culture. On one side all men. On the other all females.
Who wins the survival battle and makes the other their bitches?

Be honest, my sweet.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 15229
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Mon Aug 26, 2013 6:43 pm

Before I waste more time on you, because I am getting a scent of something bad. 
It may be coming from me, but my instincts rarely fail me.

For miss Pretzle twisting herself in a bind:


I will humor you.
My position is that sexual traits are determined by hormonal effects, influencing the embryo in a way that benefits it in its sexual role - or that facilitates this specialized role.
For me nature doesn't give a shit about equality and fairness, and only produces individuals to function and to specialize, so as to increase the potential survivability of an entire population - or a genetic grouping. 

I do not just say that men are more creative, I say look at who dominates the creative fields in the present, who did in the past, and I also provide a reasoning as to why males must have this creative advantage and not so much females. 

You, on the other hand have modern mythologies - the popular, feel-good, ones -, infinite excuses, and ignorance to support your claims. 
For you the fact that females do not dominate in any intellectual field requiring creativity, innovation and thinking outside the box, is a male conspiracy spanning thousands of years,  the delusion that environment only has an affect on the body and not the brain, and man's willful, or not, ignorance as to what differences there are between categories which are aesthetically obvious. 

Explain how intelligence evolves if it is uniformly distributed across individuals and populations.
Explain how chimps cannot be educated up to the level of a human if all that is required is to be taught/trained how to use your brain, and you are not born with limits to your potentials.
Explain how body is other than brain/mind.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν


Last edited by Satyr on Mon Aug 26, 2013 7:02 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 15229
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Mon Aug 26, 2013 6:44 pm

Me in ChatBox, for some real-time debating. 
What a Face

Please, feel free to get acquainted with Satyr's actual views, if it so interests you, before you proceed in making a fool of yourself.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 15229
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Mon Aug 26, 2013 7:21 pm

The newest member and feminist, needs to collect her thoughts. 

Already we see the typical Modern tactics.



-Deference to authorities
We must discuss about the real world all around us, through intermediate sources. 
We cannot and should not, judge, think, speculate, conclude, unless it is validated by some commonly accepted authority.
The motives of this authority is never in doubt.

She requires validation to determine that what she perceives as different - an apple and an orange, for instance - is actually so. 
The senses, appearances, are not to be trusted. We need an expert to tell us that what appears to be different is actually so.
Not even experience, history, can usurp the power of the institutional authority.

Here we witness the deep confusion human intervention has produced in the minds of the mediocre - a comforting confusion, mind you, and so one they willingly give themselves over to, wholeheartedly. 
If reality can be hidden, changed to imitate something else by human intervention, by a willful hand, then we cannot trust anything using our senses. All thinking and judging must come from a common source.

This is, in a nutshell, is institutionalization.
Our own senses, our own brain, is not to be trusted.
The other's is, if (s)he/it tells us what is most popular, what our peers and family members think, and when it makes us feel good and proud and hopeful.
Also what we call brainwashing methods. Watch a televangelist to get a taste of it, in the extreme.


-Ignorance as an Argument
Because we do not know everything about how intelligence manifests in the brain, we must err on the side that makes us feel good about ourselves and the world around us.

If we do not know the absolute truth, then we must postpone judgment.
Therefore, if we are not god-like omniscient, we must assume that we are all equally ignorant, and embrace whatever makes us feel good and what unites us in our shared ignorance.

The slightest doubt is reason enough to dismiss a possibility, whereas in all other cases a bigger doubt is not good enough.
Science, for whatever reason, cannot or does not tell us everything, ergo we can only assume what satisfies us personally, though it contradicts our own sensual awareness and experiences.
We see, but we cannot decide what we see, because science has not told us, definitely, what we see; it has not given us the right to see.  


-Institutionalized Thinking
This is related to the first remark.
Here the benevolence and the motives of the institution are not in question, but our senses are. 
What we perceive as different is not truly so, at least not where it matters (intelligence), because appearances are not manifestations of essence, but are products of chance, or are purely superficial.
Yet, at the same time, human institutions, science now being highly institutionalized, is not to be questioned or doubted, for it is regulated, you see. 
You know, like the markets were in capitalism - self-regulating institutions. 


-Nature as Fair
The idea that nature or evolution is just, or that it should be, if it is not already, permeates the Judeo-Christian mindset, even when it is convinced that it has outgrown this nihilistic childishness by calling itself secular humanist, or Marxist, or Socialist or ...modern.

Nothing makes us skeptical like a conception which is detrimental to us on a personal level.
But, what flatters us never, or rarely, makes us doubt it's motives.
We never try to get into its psychology, or delve into its fears its vileness, its illness.
We only do so sometimes, which, ironically, exposes our own motives, and illness.

The world is fair, and it is men who are unfair. Man as an evil spirit, reminding us of Rousseau and his delusions about the innocent wild-man.
You see, up until men invented Paternalism, out of thin-air (perhaps Satan had a hand in it), women and men were equal, like they are in all primate and primal social structures.
See Bonobo, the ape that makes feminists wet - an orgy-fest, made possible by the absence of any great threat.
Sort of like the current western lifestyles.   
Female and male divergence is not usual in nature, you must believe me, because it was man that invented exploitation and injustice, and these vile gender roles.
Some say men invented heterosexual reproduction to keep women pregnant and dull.

No, man did not conjure up the fable of justice, but the reverse is the case. 


-Superficial Specialization 
It would seem that specialization in nature is purely superficial, or what is referred to as "physical," and that it has nothing to do with cognitive abilities. 
But this only applies in certain aspects of nature, and not others ...conveniently so. 

The mind/body duality is alive and well, amongst those who profess to call themselves intelligent, and enlightened.

When a cheetah, for example, splintered-off from a common ancestor along with the leopard, through natural selection, the traits it required to take advantage of its niche had only physical effects and no mental, psychological ones.
You see, cheetahs are just the same as house-cats ...except in appearance.
Species, therefore, is a purely physical matter.
All species are equal in intelligence ...or does this only apply to humans, again?


-Shame
As exemplified by this feminists first posting, the idea that some intellectual pursuits are suspect, and open the one indulging in them to all sorts of speculative assertions.
But others are exempt, for no ulterior motive should be sought when one is flattered and when a repetition of the popular and the common is in effect.
If you are strange, you must be a witch in old Salem. If not, then you are normal.
A "normal moron," I would assume.
This female wonders why this forum is so "obsessed" - as she would like to think of it - with sex, or sexual issues, but does not wonder about any other thought dealing with the human condition.

Does she wonder why her culture and her peers are obsessed with love, the Platonic kind?
Can she come up with a few hypothetical, concenring this unending obsession with this emotion?  

Here, the either/or scenario is in play. 
Either something is fear-based, and hateful and bad, or it is loving, and benevolent, and good. 
It is either healthy and productive and instructive, or it is destructive and ill.
No grey zones here. The lines are un-clearly drawn.
GOOD .... BAD
Healthy ... Ill

In the meantime let is settle on the uniformity of a singular oneness.


-Appearance is OTHER than Essence/Spirit/Nature
It's not that appearance reflects the phenomenon's essence, but that it is actually meant to hide it, mask it. The senses did not evolve to help us judge and, through this judging, this discrimination, survive, but that they evolved to trick us, to test us.

Something appears o be different but is not so. It is only so in appearance.
This, of course, in true nihilistic, selective-reasoning, style, only applies in some cases - not surprisingly when dealing with human beings and what hurts them. 
Beauty, is skin deep, and how one looks says nothing about what he is.

He, in fact, is other than what he appears. He, as an identity, is separate from the shell he is forced to endure, because some evil spirit thrust it upon him.
Again Judeo-Christian bullshit, in all its glory.

So, although we are all human -not a generalization- this is not a category based on sex, ergo species categories are not sexist, but sexual specialized categories are.
The bub-categories of male/female, or Negro/Caucasian, are over-generalizations, and fear-based prejudices.
They are founded on superficial, judgments ...but human being is not.
In one case appearance matters, in the other, not so much.
Why?
Because ...it feels right, and nobody in science has told us what to think.

If you lobotomize yourself, it all makes sense.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 9035
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Mon Aug 26, 2013 8:13 pm

Anfang wrote:
Lyssa wrote:
Would you kneel before a bishop, or would you rather have your head chopped off because of self-esteem?
I should have written 'To me' not 'For me'. The words self-esteem and self-love have a very similar meaning in my view. But let's expose my self in that scenario with the bishop.
It's not an either or decision. In my experience - certain things I'll accept and others I won't - it's not only depending on the thing itself though but also on my state of mind, which parts of myself are being dominant at the moment, how my decisions impact others who I feel, I have a responsibility towards. It's depending on the moment.
Righto. Lets just lick the finger-tip and raise it to the sky and see which direction the wind blows, and what the meterological department is saying about the weather today, and what colour flower is brushing against me, then depending on my mood and feelings and emotions that particular second, I might bend over or not. Who knows. We'll see when it happens. Principles are after all not advanced re-solutions and scaffolds shaping our character.
To each his own. The questions were rhetorical and not at you actually.

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 9035
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Mon Aug 26, 2013 8:18 pm

Pretzle wrote:
If is the big word here. I see women stepping into those niches as easily as any man. You do not. So again : You and your fellows with your females should rejoice at the downfall of the feminized masses.
Growth needs Resistances.
More massive the resistance, then higher is the evolutionary leap or one perishes from the pressure; either way.
Mastery and Domination is about Subjugation, not Elimination.
Orpheus getting the animals to dance to his tune and getting them to do his work, not the Pied-piper exterminating them.


_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 2102
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 34
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Tue Aug 27, 2013 11:51 am

Lyssa wrote:
Righto. Lets just lick the finger-tip and raise it to the sky and see which direction the wind blows, and what the meterological department is saying about the weather today, and what colour flower is brushing against me, then depending on my mood and feelings and emotions that particular second, I might bend over or not. Who knows. We'll see when it happens. Principles are after all not advanced re-solutions and scaffolds shaping our character.
Principles shape our character over the long haul. Creating anything doesn't happen instantaneous. Even gravity takes its time to expand its pull in space. Even destruction takes time, although usually much less. In every moment we are in flux, our character isn't precisely defined but we have potential, we have room for different actions, we have a range of options, a range of character. Principles (thinking), similar to formed habits (sensual) will over time tilt our development in a different directions.

But if you ask me about a single moment in time then principles are only a small part. Principles are what shaped me in all the time, my past, coming to that one moment in time - but in that moment, it's not the principles which guide me but the core being which developed (within its limited potential) due to following my habits, my principels,.... . And that core being, as in every moment before, has room, has potential for different ways of expressing itself. How that room of possibilities looks like is depending on the innate temperament of the individual and what that individual has made of his/her potential over the long haul.

I don't know everything about my principles, because part of them are based in my unconscious and only part is conscious - this I know from experience. What I'll do in a particular situation I cannot say precisely because part of the internal figuring is not done consciously. That is, if I haven't experienced the situation at least once, better several times before - so I can only make rough estimations at best.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Tue Aug 27, 2013 9:55 pm

After reading your responses to me I decided to visit the other sites you apply to. What a personality. Upon study it is apparent that you are a passive artist of weaker minds. This alone is not bad , it is the information you create that has such potential in creating a person that can be a mass killer. The fact that you have brought others to you in compliance of your edicts is quite interesting. To date there is no known crimes that you have claimed through my short research so this is a positive for this.
The subtle yet heavy degradation of those that oppose you is vanity not knowledge. I cannot address all of your comments I have not the time. Work and family are priority. I type slowly due to Dyslexia. I will adress one concern of yours. I am not a feminist. I find genderizing detrimental to progress and evolution. Genders must learn from each other as people must learn. The only seperation must be in personal intimate relations where sexual stimulation takes place. Is it possible that I ask you questions? Your postion on forums is not unique but, it is distinct. Delving into you would be educational.
Back to top Go down
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 15229
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Tue Aug 27, 2013 10:22 pm

Pretzle wrote:
After reading your responses to me I decided to visit the other sites you apply to. What a personality. Upon study it is apparent that you are a passive artist of weaker minds. This alone is not bad  ,  it is the information you create that has such potential  in creating a person that can be a mass killer. The fact that you have brought others to you in compliance of your edicts is quite interesting.  To date there is no known crimes that you have claimed through my short research so this is a positive for this.
It's dumb luck, my sweet.


Pretzle wrote:
The subtle yet heavy degradation of those that oppose you is  vanity not knowledge.
Indeed, and therefore something someone like you can take full advantage of.


Pretzle wrote:
I cannot  address all of your comments I have not the time.
Original and simple.
Your time is precious.
Use it for something more productive ....like excusing yourself from reality. 


Pretzle wrote:
Work and family are priority. I type slowly due to Dyslexia.
Excellent usage of humility.


Pretzle wrote:
 I will adress one concern of yours.
One will do.
I am sure we can assume that you can address all of them.


Pretzle wrote:
 I am not a feminist.
Ummm, sorry to say this but this is of no concern to me.
I thought you were going to address something on-point, about evolution and about sexual specialization, but in a very typical manner, you addressed the personal.
So, yes, you leave me unconcerned.


Pretzle wrote:
 I find genderizing detrimental to progress and evolution.
And I find spieciation degrading and troubling ...I also dislike death.

Thanks for trying to play: "What I wish were true" while pretending you are rational.


Pretzle wrote:
Genders must learn from each other as people must learn.
Yes, and ape must learn from lion and negro from European and then we can hug and makeup.

And here's something I've learned form my feminine side and from the females and the effete males I've come across over the years - increasingly so in the last decade:
When confronted with the superior, which you've underestimated, settle back on the emotional, with an air of aloofness feigning reasoning. 


I learn from all aspects of nature. I learn from worms, from apes, from crocodiles, from the wind and the sun, and the birds and the plants.
Still doesn't stop me from devouring them and exploiting them. In fact it helps when I understand their nature and their tactics.

I think it's because I outgrew my naive innocence, sometime after my 30th birthday.


Pretzle wrote:
The only seperation must be in personal intimate relations where sexual stimulation takes place.
Yes, and divergence is a ploy to discover our unity.  A divine test of our spiritual enlightenment.

Like how consciousness is not about detachment finding similarity in the general and the simple.

Pretzle wrote:

Is it possible that I ask you questions? Your postion on forums is not unique but, it is distinct. Delving into you would be educational.
That sounds like a statement, not a question.
But then I have a more primitive understanding of words and questions.

I'll leave you with some questions of my own - these ones not as evasive and coy:

If I were to enter a room full of apes, would telling them about human conceptions be old and not unique?
If I tell a child that Santa is not real, is this old, and not unique?
Would a population of children not have already heard the negative story about the unreality of Santa?
Is traditionalism about what is old or is it fresh and unique and new?
What is unique?

Let me make a prediction:
These questions will also be avoided, because although you have the time to post you have little time to think of a response appropriate for posting.

I am willing to conceded defeat, if you are to explain to me what I asked for before:

How does intelligence evolve?
Why does it evolve, and how, given that it is evenly distributed within a population?

Why perceive at all, if appearances are superficial, dealing only with the physical?

What is the difference between mental and physical potentials, and how do appearances matter in all areas dealing with nature except when it comes to humans?
  
If specialization only affects the body and not the mind, then are all species equal in intelligence and only different in form and color?
If not why? 

Take care, my sweet.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 9035
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Wed Aug 28, 2013 9:19 am

Anfang wrote:
Lyssa wrote:
Righto. Lets just lick the finger-tip and raise it to the sky and see which direction the wind blows, and what the meterological department is saying about the weather today, and what colour flower is brushing against me, then depending on my mood and feelings and emotions that particular second, I might bend over or not. Who knows. We'll see when it happens. Principles are after all not advanced re-solutions and scaffolds shaping our character.
Principles shape our character over the long haul. Creating anything doesn't happen instantaneous. Even gravity takes its time to expand its pull in space. Even destruction takes time, although usually much less. In every moment we are in flux, our character isn't precisely defined but we have potential, we have room for different actions, we have a range of options, a range of character. Principles (thinking), similar to formed habits (sensual) will over time tilt our development in a different directions.

But if you ask me about a single moment in time then principles are only a small part. Principles are what shaped me in all the time, my past, coming to that one moment in time - but in that moment, it's not the principles which guide me but the core being which developed (within its limited potential) due to following my habits, my principels,.... . And that core being, as in every moment before, has room, has potential for different ways of expressing itself. How that room of possibilities looks like is depending on the innate temperament of the individual and what that individual has made of his/her potential over the long haul.

I don't know everything about my principles, because part of them are based in my unconscious and only part is conscious - this I know from experience. What I'll do in a particular situation I cannot say precisely because part of the internal figuring is not done consciously. That is, if I haven't experienced the situation at least once, better several times before - so I can only make rough estimations at best.

Hmmm.. is that so?

Tell me Anfang, did you have any Principles when you attacked Mannequin and expressed your Xt. hatred at him for being a party-crasher?
Given your statements and explanations above, can I take it, that at some point in the future, depending on your mood and the situation, you might open your a-- to Mannequin? Can you blame him then for trying his chances with you when its going to come down to how you feel about something at some particular moment?
Tell me, if someone has a gun to your head, would you rather die or take his dick in your mouth?

Give me some rough estimations.

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Wed Aug 28, 2013 9:53 am

Very Happy
Back to top Go down
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 2102
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 34
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Wed Aug 28, 2013 10:17 am

Lyssa wrote:
Tell me Anfang, did you have any Principles when you attacked Mannequin and expressed your Xt. hatred at him for being a party-crasher?
No, I had no principles - see my post which you quoted. But those 'principles' must be Xt. based - whatever that means at the time, right? Why would you assume that the main motivation for my attack (by the way, tell me which post you are refering to, there were a few in that exchange) was him being a party-crasher? - To shorten this here, A main motivation was the question of influence and dominance. I wanted to diminish his dominance because I don't like him in a position of power over me. If he would be someone else or developed in a different direction then I wouldn't mind a stronger influence coming from him.
Is it Xt. to do so? And would be Xt. to do something about a 'party-crasher'? Well if that's what you are saying then call me Xt. all you like. I don't mind your disapproval on this... if there is any.

Quote :

Given your statements and explanations above, can I take it, that at some point in the future, depending on your mood and the situation, you might open your a-- to Mannequin? Can you blame him then for trying his chances with you when its going to come down to how you feel about something at some particular moment?
Yes, sure, you can take it - affirm it all... . How silly of you but if you feel like it then go ahead.
So the chances for that are pretty much zero (If we are talking willingly).
What do you mean, to blame him for trying? Did I complain to the 'authorities' about it?
I don't want - I do something about it.
What kind of moral are you trying to attach to that? Stick on it what you want to see.

Quote :
Tell me, if someone has a gun to your head, would you rather die or take his dick in your mouth?
Give me some rough estimations.
Nope - no estimations for you.
You are a thrill-seeker, aren't you.
Like a bungee-jumper.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 15229
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Wed Aug 28, 2013 7:32 pm

I am truly disappointed in Pretzel

I was ready and willing to completely change my mind on man issues, turning my world-view on its head, if only she could provide some alternative reasoning, some different explanations, something that can harmonize what I see with what I think.

---Why is appearance not a representation of essence, of nature - if by 'nature' we mean the sum of all past nurturing?

---If it is not so then why do we evolve the senses to perceive, to be aware, to sense? 

---If similarity is our common identity, then why diversity, and why must we detach, as it were, so as to them become aware of how we are one? 
Is there some kind of Divine motive, a ploy, a testing phase? 

---If intelligence is uniformly distributed across a population, or its potential is, then why is it such an advantage and why are some species less or more intelligent than others, or seemingly so?

---If specialization, in any context, does not promote the traits necessary to carry out the reason why it comes about, then how does it evolve and why?

---If environment only affects the body and not the brain/mind, then why doesn't it?
What is mind in relation to body?
Is dualism over or does it still factor into modern thinking?

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1265
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Wed Aug 28, 2013 10:26 pm

Lyssa wrote:

Tell me, if someone has a gun to your head, would you rather die or take his dick in your mouth?

Give me some rough estimations.
This reminds me of someone close to me who was in that exact situation and chose the latter - but later promised to fatally stab the person if they ever tried again. They were around 14 at the time and, of course, male. The person perpetrating was their step-father.

Because the person is related, I wonder if it was cowardice, if I carry the same blood. I do. However, how much does blood matter in this regard? The awareness of feminization, the differences between the male and female - how they react with each other. What kind of masculine control does a 14 year old boy have over his feminine nature? It's so near the edge of the maturity of masculine spirit that it confounds me. It is probably why it affects him so readily, too. If he was only 3-4 years younger, there wouldn't be such a serious question about the nature of his spirit - whatever feminine aspects in him were surely strong, to accept and submit, at such a young age. Who would expect a someone 10 or under to accept death over being used in such a way?

Taking what I have from Satyr's views, every male has these aspects to him, a feminine breaking point - it's a matter of exercising that masculine control over the immense fear and desire to give up, give in. There is a coward in all, but intelligence, wisdom and heart is a determining factor in how that emotion is managed.

Part of the reason this concerns me is that I might actually choose to take it over dying right now. The other is that I care about how people perceive me. Who? Well, perhaps too many people. It includes those whom I respect here, though.

Because I think I may choose that now, I wonder if it's an aspect of me I can change - hence the importance of mentioning the masculine control over female aspects. I grew up with a mother telling me to always think of my wife first - a sister telling me I was born a girl. How much of a battle that was for me.. I don't remember, probably because I don't want to. I can only imagine it as very difficult.

I realize the rational end to someone who accepts being cattle, who accepts taking the dick. They're used, constantly but slowly. Humans are one of the rare animals you can farm because of their fear of death, they're also one of the very rare ones you can't because they think longer term than themselves. You can kick a cat or dog but it still won't do your farming or your dishes. You can kick and prod a cow, but it won't produce any faster because of it. But if you beat a man, he may just work faster or become your bitch. Taking death over injustice grants you self-esteem that you won't allow yourself to be treated as an animal, that you did your best. You also insured that your family and all future generations will not suffer the same.

Whether or not people perceive you as masculine, I suppose, isn't actually a problem - it's whether you are or not. If you do something about those slights or 'injustices' against you, then there's something to be said for there.

Here's how I now see what you've said in regards to Anfang, Lyssa. If you give in to the moment, you've let your feminine aspect take over - you might as well be whimsical. This is not an absolute for the situation - that was Xt. thinking on my part. That close someone who was in that situation, promised an end to that person's life had it happened again and it was heeded by him - he never touched him again. Suffering that humiliation, he still kept his spirit - he still preserved his future through a promise to those that would use him.

So maybe, there's no blood aspect involved in my 'willingness' to give in in that moment... Maybe there's a memetic reason. Time will always tell... Perhaps something I've revealed will allow one of you to speed up that process of awareness.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 2102
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 34
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:12 am

Slaughtz wrote:
Part of the reason this concerns me is that I might actually choose to take it over dying right now. The other is that I care about how people perceive me. Who? Well, perhaps too many people. It includes those whom I respect here, though.
The rational decision is to take it, no? I mean, if you assume that it's not a bluff then you should choose to live, to fight another day and not die at the spot. But... some people are too proud to comply - they are, frankly, stupid, if you think about it. They'll probably die - or was it a bluff after all? There is more than one way to handle such a situation, in a 'masculine' way.

But be aware! - I'm right now telling you what is masculine and what is not - don't take that lightly. You must decide for yourself. People are full of shit - manipulation is a daily event in all our lives.

The proud person is proud not because he's rational but because he can't help it, to be proud. It's his strength and his weakness at the same time. He'll get shot at times - bang, dead. But it's even more than just about himself because by refusing to comply he tilts the world for everybody else as well. If there were only complying sheep running around then it would be easy to farm them. But the odd encounter with something else raises the bar, the costs for the farmer.

Quote :
Here's how I now see what you've said in regards to Anfang, Lyssa. If you give in to the moment, you've let your feminine aspect take over - you might as well be whimsical.
To give in to the moment...
How about taking the moment?

Principles like habits are a useful crutch - once formed they minimize the energy, which is required for making decisions. Routines are energy savers because there is no internal process for figuring things out on the spot.

Aside from where your or my principles come from -
The question I'd ask is - Are you following your own principles? And if you are, what in you is following whose principles? Who or what part created those principles? For whom or what part were those principles created for?

Is it the masculine part which controls, guides the feminine part?
Fine, then let's move to the moment...

In that very moment, which part is in charge?
If it's the feminine part then let's hope that that part has been trained well by your masculine part, so it can follow its principles.
If it's the masculine part which is in charge in that moment, the part which takes over in that situation, then principles aren't followed but that part just acts.

In my experience - a situation can startle you if you weren't prepared. And then you get a grip on your fear - then you grow resistant - then you focus and become assertive inside - then you become assertive on the outside. You control your self in that moment. No principles there for me - at least I don't see them.

It may very well be different for others.


It's all training. Every encounter, even if lost... If there is discontent over the result then there is potential for growth. To become.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
reasonvemotion

avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 587
Join date : 2013-01-09
Location : The Female Spirit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:23 am

Now contributors have to deal with the admitted dual usage of one avatar.  For some reason you both seem to find this amusing.   Why wouldn't people be confused, especially considering you both have the same opinion almost verbatim.  One of you is not thinking for him/herself. Why does it need two people to relay the same opinion, whilst hiding behind the one avatar.

Satyr wrote:

Quote :
Me in ChatBox, for some real-time debating.
Why not  excusively "You" behind "Your" avatar on this thread for some real-time debating.

Pretzle wrote:

Quote :
Is it possible that I ask you questions?
You may well ask, but it can't be guaranteed you won't get two to answer, under the guise of one.

I look forward to this, hopefully on this thread.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Thu Aug 29, 2013 2:39 pm



"How does intelligence evolve?
Why does it evolve, and how, given that it is evenly distributed within a population?"

Intelligence develops with omnivorous diet. A balanced diet promotes a higher capabilty for higher intelligence. Herbivors and carnivores lack one and too much of the other. Their systems have become suited to this yet it caps significant brain development.. Humans that lean either to carnivore or vegetarian will suffer from underdevelopment as will their offspring. This can be reversed with in one to two generations at the most. This has been tested with humans and apes. Proper diet is the most crucial element to higher intellect.


"Why perceive at all, if appearances are superficial, dealing only with the physical?"

Sight is one of our survival needs from the past yet not as much now nor is it used by itself. We see, hear, smell, and observe to perceive threat. We have gone beyond common mammal perceptions. We have learned to combine and judge friend or foe without reliance on vision only. Vision does include not just physical appearance of another, it does include watching body movement and expressions. Animal use physical difference only to determine friend/foe/food. Many also use smell in combination with sight.


"What is the difference between mental and physical potentials, and how do appearances matter in all areas dealing with nature except when it comes to humans?"
  
There is more than one difference between the two potentials . Having the strength to pick up two hundred pounds does not mean you know where to move it and knowing where to move it does not mean you can. That is the main difference. Appearance does matter to humans it just is not used by itself. Animals use appearance as friend/ foe or food many also use smell in conjunction with appearance. Humans use these two along with sight of action and rational thinking that surpasses fight or flight instinct.


"If specialization only affects the body and not the mind, then are all species equal in intelligence and only different in form and color?
If not why? "

Those that have better use of the right side of the brain and those that have better use of the left are specializations of the brain. Combine that with proper diet and education there will be specific abilities one can have..
The last part was already adressed by the first answer about diets.
Back to top Go down
hǣþen

avatar

Gender : Male Posts : 165
Join date : 2013-05-23
Location : Sigil

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Thu Aug 29, 2013 4:09 pm

If its just diet and education why do sub-Saharan africans have the same mean I.Q as African Americans that have access to better diets and better education?

The same can be said for whites living in South Africa, Europe and North America.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 9035
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Thu Aug 29, 2013 6:07 pm

Anfang wrote:
Lyssa wrote:
Tell me Anfang, did you have any Principles when you attacked Mannequin and expressed your Xt. hatred at him for being a party-crasher?
No, I had no principles - see my post which you quoted. But those 'principles' must be Xt. based - whatever that means at the time, right?
Exactly, so you had no principles whatsoever as you say at the time. Which is why I say why feel disgusted at Mannequin if you are the one being ambiguous suiting yourself to whatever it is you are facing at the moment? If you are going to live moment to moment, someone might as well think today you huff and puff, but tom. you might as well be in the mood for opening your supple orifices.
No. They are not "must be" Xt. "based"; they Were.
Perpetual, Apaosha, Recidivist, Satyr gave their reasons and views on the matter of homosexuality. The Wowman all la di da uttered some heroine lines "this is going to be interesting" and " i'll play the game" - from an actress who comes to the set, wears make-up, delivers her lines, and packs up, this is normal and one expects no more from such an exotic creature rustling by in her silk and chiffon. At the max., she too would have quoted some line from Corinthians. But what did YOU do? You sprung out from nowhere like you were squatting and hiding in the bushes only to say, "I'd call you Mr.Fancy Pants, except you aren't wearing any" - now, if I were a homo, I would def. take you for a tease.
But luckily for you it didn't stop there. You showed what a serious Xt. you were being when you added, the real problem was, people were not taking out the Trash Completely.
Its only a Xt. who wishes to totally castrate the parts that disturbs him, scares him. Its Xtianity that found the body and passions repulsive and the mind-body severance is old news.
Its only a Xt. who wants to erase and wish away completely all that is unpleasant and repulsive to him.
Its only a puritanical Xt. who fears getting his hands dirty who tells the other "you will see yourself out"... I laughed...


Quote :
Why would you assume that the main motivation for my attack (by the way, tell me which post you are refering to, there were a few in that exchange) was him being a party-crasher? -
Why would you assume I was assuming that?
I think you calling him a Temporal Anomaly is quite clear that it wasn't because he was an ordinary party-crasher. That much is obvious to all.

Quote :
To shorten this here, A main motivation was the question of influence and dominance. I wanted to diminish his dominance because I don't like him in a position of power over me.
I don't recall him starting anything with you or trying to dominate you - not even subliminally. You initiated the name-calling without any serious opinion, thought, rational confrontation or any substantial debate. You simply passed judgement and called him Mr.Fancy Pants because you found him ugly and repulsive - everyone has their own aesthetic sensibility and that's fine, but to a Xt. mind, only that which is pleasant is "normal" and only what is normal is "good"...

You cite his "over-powering" presence was the motivation of your hatred or attack; I smell more.
No matter, I am not here on some de-Xt. mission.

Quote :
Yes, sure, you can take it - affirm it all... . How silly of you but if you feel like it then go ahead.
So the chances for that are pretty much zero (If we are talking willingly).

"What I'll do in a particular situation I cannot say precisely because part of the internal figuring is not done consciously. That is, if I haven't experienced the situation at least once, better several times before - so I can only make rough estimations at best."


It takes a gun shoved at your head to do something unwillingly, and yet how you'd react to a bishop threatening you to convert or die is only something you can roughly estimate... ?
A mental rape is only roughly estimable, maybe even pardonable depending on the situation, compared to a physical rape?
I am sure I haven't gotten down way way down to the bottom of your sub/conscious principles...

I need a flash-light.


Quote :
What do you mean, to blame him for trying? Did I complain to the 'authorities' about it?
As in you call him repulsive but you state no reasons, no principles, no arguments, for why you feel so - you yourself admitted, you had no principles. So why should he not take your saying "Mr. Fancy Pants" as a come-on, as a tease?
Is his behaviour repulsive, or is it YOU who is being ambiguous and easy for anyone to interpret you the way they want to?
Focus on your Self first.

Quote :
What kind of moral are you trying to attach to that? Stick on it what you want to see.
What? You are acting as though you are bullied?
As amusing as your semantic performances are, if I wanted to enjoy some Ballet, I'd prefer to go to a play.

Its true, I've got nothing better to do. I am so jobless and bored I am here to smear Your character.
Now Stick that wherever.

I posted some rhetorical questions and even said "these questions were not at you actually", but You decided to put yourself in the questions and made some statements which I found non-sensical and I have stated my reasons and opinion as to why I found it so, and how you appear to me. If you are not a Xt. fine. If you are, fine. Who cares.
And what does what I think of you matter?!

Quote :
Tell me, if someone has a gun to your head, would you rather die or take his dick in your mouth?
Give me some rough estimations.
Nope - no estimations for you.
I know, its too early. You atleast need to experience gagging once before you decide on what you'll be doing at a particular moment, lol

Quote :
You are a thrill-seeker,
I'm just a ho..ary person.
Ancient souls are full of mirth.

Quote :
aren't you.
not even started on my nymph phase yet...  
The moon is in waxing...

Quote :
Like a bungee-jumper.
Detained by rubber is not my idea of a thrill...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

0/100.

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 9035
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Thu Aug 29, 2013 6:08 pm

Slaughtz wrote:
Lyssa wrote:

Tell me, if someone has a gun to your head, would you rather die or take his dick in your mouth?
Give me some rough estimations.
This reminds me of someone close to me who was in that exact situation and chose the latter - but later promised to fatally stab the person if they ever tried again. They were around 14 at the time and, of course, male. The person perpetrating was their step-father.

Because the person is related, I wonder if it was cowardice, if I carry the same blood. I do. However, how much does blood matter in this regard? The awareness of feminization, the differences between the male and female - how they react with each other. What kind of masculine control does a 14 year old boy have over his feminine nature? It's so near the edge of the maturity of masculine spirit that it confounds me. It is probably why it affects him so readily, too. If he was only 3-4 years younger, there wouldn't be such a serious question about the nature of his spirit - whatever feminine aspects in him were surely strong, to accept and submit, at such a young age. Who would expect a someone 10 or under to accept death over being used in such a way?

Taking what I have from Satyr's views, every male has these aspects to him, a feminine breaking point - it's a matter of exercising that masculine control over the immense fear and desire to give up, give in. There is a coward in all, but intelligence, wisdom and heart is a determining factor in how that emotion is managed.

Part of the reason this concerns me is that I might actually choose to take it over dying right now. The other is that I care about how people perceive me. Who? Well, perhaps too many people. It includes those whom I respect here, though.

Because I think I may choose that now, I wonder if it's an aspect of me I can change - hence the importance of mentioning the masculine control over female aspects. I grew up with a mother telling me to always think of my wife first - a sister telling me I was born a girl. How much of a battle that was for me.. I don't remember, probably because I don't want to. I can only imagine it as very difficult.

I realize the rational end to someone who accepts being cattle, who accepts taking the dick. They're used, constantly but slowly. Humans are one of the rare animals you can farm because of their fear of death, they're also one of the very rare ones you can't because they think longer term than themselves. You can kick a cat or dog but it still won't do your farming or your dishes. You can kick and prod a cow, but it won't produce any faster because of it. But if you beat a man, he may just work faster or become your bitch. Taking death over injustice grants you self-esteem that you won't allow yourself to be treated as an animal, that you did your best. You also insured that your family and all future generations will not suffer the same.

Whether or not people perceive you as masculine, I suppose, isn't actually a problem - it's whether you are or not. If you do something about those slights or 'injustices' against you, then there's something to be said for there.

Here's how I now see what you've said in regards to Anfang, Lyssa. If you give in to the moment, you've let your feminine aspect take over - you might as well be whimsical. This is not an absolute for the situation - that was Xt. thinking on my part. That close someone who was in that situation, promised an end to that person's life had it happened again and it was heeded by him - he never touched him again. Suffering that humiliation, he still kept his spirit - he still preserved his future through a promise to those that would use him.

Too many cross-tracks.

The question between self-love and self-esteem I initially and rhetorically posed, was at Mannequin and his personal context.
I was trying to tell him not to snuff out his little light.

What I said was in the context of a choice, where one did have power to do something despite the surrounding depravity.
If I were a man, and being reduced to a mannequin, and not even an Asian girl suited me, and sharing a rare wife with other men as it was the custom in Sparta had no chance with no men today, then a nobler option would be to adopt a child and teach him/her my values and inculcate in him/her the beauty of a masculine/fem. spirit and raise him/her to be an honourable individual. And perhaps when he/she grows and the situation is hundred times worse, I'd still teach him/her to again adopt someone and keep the flame alive. That is defiance against this age as I know it to the capacity possible by me. Not let the fire die come what may.

Not at Mannequin, I am speaking generally here,
Shake off this victim mind, this helplessness, hopelessness, complaining, moaning, whining, bitching, and see the best you can do and do it. We all have dreams that have broken or are breaking, but when are you going to uncover or discover your spirit, test your will, your strength if not in the most tragic age? Depraved times give the advantage of showing 'what is noble?' more well-defined, clarity to its contours. I can only feel grateful I am getting to live in this age.

Doing depraved things to survive at any cost in the name of 'self-love' is a dishonesty with one's self, when if the will is strong and self-esteeming enough, it will find a way.

Self-love has been falsely taken to mean doing whatever it takes to make the self feel good, pleasured, to gift all joy.
This kind of self-love which I regard as self-submission is different from that which reveres and raises itself in/through the pain and struggle and suffering and agony it may encounter in the way and even desires to encounter.


Now Anfang enters and says, to him self-love and self-esteem are the same thing.
So I ask musing... was it self-love at the cost of self-esteem when many pagans converted to Xt.?
Two issues here.

1. A man clinging to his self - he makes his self emerge from his esteem. And so, he survives at any cost knowing he can always adjust his sense of self by whatever he esteems at the moment, or cowardly takes out his life and escapes when something threatens to injure his reputation - if things have failed with him, he believes he himself is a failure and so suicides.

2. A man possessing his self - he makes esteem emerge from him self. And so, he either survives knowing his self is intact by enduring the disgrace, or he survives post-humously knowing it takes honourable death and self-sacrifice to keep a heroism-meme alive. If there were no heroes who died *from honour [not *for honour - i.e. Xtianity.], if there were no honour-conscious memes of dead heroes, and myths and stories to tell, a culture cannot survive. It becomes feminized.
Dead heroic memes are as necessary to a culture's survival as are living heroic genes enduring disgraces to preserve and carry forward a culture.

J.-Xt. marking Christ as the last abs. sacrifice, and hyper-inflating individuals to the point of making them unsacrificiable, and condemning violence, aggression, masculinity is thwarting heroism, and the development of any culture. J.Xt. is and promotes and can promote only a cult-ure, a semblance, not a living culture.

The self-clinging man is narcissistic and is in love with the image of himself.
The self-possessed man is masterly and is in love with himself.

In the Anfang case, shifting and forming Principles as it suits the situation and mood and moment tells me, he might be the former.
I don't claim to 'know' him, but from what I have 'perceived' of him, he lacks self-focus and is more interested in what others are upto. Hopefully his awareness will grow.


In your case, I will say this much. - the same as I told Perpetual before.
There is a body we inherit, but it is upto us, to make it our own.

How we interpret a situation is a direct expression of our Will.
The re/cognition of a Fact, how it is absorbed, assimilated, itself is an interpretation tied to our will-power.

Is your relative cowardly for suffering abuse, or is the whole culture and society that keeps children and teenagers dumbed-down and redeems a homosexual as equal to any other 'human', also a factor?
In my view, no one person is ever responsible - we are the sum total of our past. This is a near a-moralistic dionysian view blaming neither your relative, nor his step-father.
On the one hand, what kind of family tolerates him and does not report him to the police or has him castrated, even if its many years after discovery?
What stops your relative from beating him to a pulp after he's grown up? This is one kind of masculinity.

On the one hand, letting another live in their own shame with no feeling of wanting to punish them or acting judge and jury can be a very noble and courageous soul. Its only the ones who can't redeem themselves, want to inflict pain and vengeance on the other. This too Is one kind of masculinity.  If the other is so beneath and depraved and soul-less already, what would one be punishing anyway? Its a rotting dead corpse.


Anfang thinks I am a thrill-seeker because I ask questions like if he'll open his a-- or his mouth to a homo?

This is because he is emotional and takes things literally.

Look around you, and cultural-marxism is trying to practice faggotry with every one, what J-Xt. missionaries have been doing since ages. Moulding, converting, coercing, seducing, policing... except the domain has shifted from physical to mental, from gene to meme.
Men can no longer be men. They have to think a hundred things before they can spontaneously act or speak. This is the case on some heavy duty philosophy forums, never mind the real world where its even worse.
This is RAPE. Mental Assault. Spiritual Battery.
This is Happening as we speak.

How many have had to swallow their pride, their self-esteem and forced to a submissive position?

Yet, the world was always war. Life was always violence, rape, pillage, exploitation. Nothing new about this.

How we behave, even if No One were to be watching or aware of our actions, is what will equally get woven into the future. Its a Design We Set.
Its the disposition and spirit we take into things, not the act itself.
A Deed is always in becoming.
Its not the cowardly deed itself but what one makes it Become... to where one leads it.

The Past is only an Inheritance. 'You' are what YOU Earn. And You will be what you chose to save from all that was given, and all that you gathered.


Quote :

So maybe, there's no blood aspect involved in my 'willingness' to give in in that moment... Maybe there's a memetic reason. Time will always tell... Perhaps something I've revealed will allow one of you to speed up that process of awareness.
En-trusting your awareness to another makes you ripe for slavery.

When the sun sets and the moon sets and the light outside has gone, strike up your inner light and awaken your self by yourself.

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 9035
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Thu Aug 29, 2013 6:14 pm

reasonvemotion wrote:
Now contributors have to deal with the admitted dual usage of one avatar.  Why does it need two people to relay the same opinion, whilst hiding behind the one avatar.
Wowman, you're back!! I was missing target-practice
Satyr has given his reasons why.

Why would contributors be concerned if as you say, he&she had the same opinion almost verbatim, and one of them wasn't even thinking and was like a dummy card?

Quote :
For some reason you both seem to find this amusing.
I am assuming by 'you both', you mean Satyr and I... unless of course you have now started seeing Satyr HERE as a dual-person in himself, apart from me, which would then make it 3 people in 1 Satyr avatar and that'd be just too funny coming from a bi-polar 2/1 person in 1 wowman avatar...
But since one half of Satyr is just a 0 dummy and so similar that it could almost be him, then there are only 2 people in 1 Satyr avatar including 1 me.

In any case, assuming one 2/1 of you was talking to 1 me or 1/02 Satyr, I'll say I do actually - find it amusing... Its hilarious to watch a board experience the consequences of its own beliefs and values on gender.

Quote :
Why wouldn't people be confused, especially considering you both have the same opinion almost verbatim.
Confused? Maybe you haven't been following. That board has been in no doubt that 02Satyr was Sabina, and its that personality-obsession with those 4 trolls pushing all philosophical ideas to the back-burner which is the issue.

Quote :
One of you is not thinking for him/herself.
Assuming you are addressing this to 02 Satyr, I'll leave 1/0 of him to reply to this.

Quote :

Satyr wrote:

Quote :
Me in ChatBox, for some real-time debating.
Why not  excusively "You" behind "Your" avatar on this thread for some real-time debating.
Why not you watch the film Identity starring John Cusack and tell me - Lyssa, what you thought of it?
Satyr is everybody here. Even I am him. I was recently told I apart from Satyr am also two other people on this board. I don't exist. I am not even a female. Satyr is a mega-Octopus, or a matrix mind alone, no body - he's a BOT simultaneously operating many avatars and many threads at one time.
Maybe Satyr's half-phantom, half-goat, half-woman, half-man, half-bot.. a transhuman intelligence... aissshhhh

Quote :

Pretzle wrote:

Quote :
Is it possible that I ask you questions?
You may well ask, but it can't be guaranteed you won't get two to answer, under the guise of one.
Look at the Heroine all Hot for Satyr jealously preventing Pretzle from taking him seriously...
btw., how do you know Pretzle is not Satyr, the other 0 "girl" involved as Sabina?
Can you be sure of anything?
mmm...

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Thu Aug 29, 2013 7:06 pm

hǣþen wrote:
If its just diet and education why do sub-Saharan africans have the same mean I.Q as African Americans that have access to better diets and better education?

The same can be said for whites living in South Africa, Europe and North America.
Access does not mean it is done. The vast majority of humans do not have good balanced diets of healthy foods. Processed foods lack, Combinations are unobserved. People eat for taste not health. You will note that I said a proper diet. Ever note how the meat and fresh vegetable sections are smaller than the processed foods sections in a grocery store? People want convienent and quick not true health. Unhealthy male sperm and unhealthy female eggs damage potential. Diet affects the potential abilities of progeny. As this fetus becomes developed the host mother must be on a healthy diet to give proper nutrients to the fetus. Improper diet during infancy and beyond will inhibit the brain's development. Most do not eat right.
Back to top Go down
reasonvemotion

avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 587
Join date : 2013-01-09
Location : The Female Spirit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Thu Aug 29, 2013 8:06 pm


Lyssa wrote:

Quote :
Perpetual, Apaosha, Recidivist, Satyr gave their reasons and views on the matter of homosexuality. The Wowman all la di da uttered some heroine lines "this is going to be interesting" and " i'll play the game" - from an actress who comes to the set, wears make-up, delivers her lines, and packs up, this is normal and one expects no more from such an exotic creature rustling by in her silk and chiffon. At the max., she too would have quoted some line from Corinthians.
My view on homosexuality has already been expressed at length in the thread Deconstructing Adam.  Obviously you chose to ignore and as usual choose to distort.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
reasonvemotion

avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 587
Join date : 2013-01-09
Location : The Female Spirit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Thu Aug 29, 2013 8:19 pm

reasonvemotion wrote:
Now contributors have to deal with the admitted dual usage of one avatar.  Why does it need two people to relay the same opinion, whilst hiding behind the one avatar.


Lyssa wrote:
Wowman, you're back!! I was missing target-practice
Satyr has given his reasons why.

Why would contributors be concerned if as you say, he&she had the same opinion almost verbatim, and one of them wasn't even thinking and was like a dummy card?


Why would he&she think it necessary to hide behind the same avatar, if not to deceive.  The deception is what people obviously feel uncomfortable about.



Quote:
For some reason you both seem to find this amusing.  

Lyssa wrote:

I am assuming by 'you both', you mean Satyr and I... unless of course you have now started seeing Satyr HERE as a dual-person in himself, apart from me, which would then make it 3 people in 1 Satyr avatar and that'd be just too funny coming from a bi-polar 2/1 person in 1 wowman avatar...
But since one half of Satyr is just a 0 dummy and so similar that it could almost be him, then there are only 2 people in 1 Satyr avatar including 1 me.

In any case, assuming one 2/1 of you was talking to 1 me or 1/02 Satyr, I'll say I do actually - find it amusing... Its hilarious to watch a board experience the consequences of its own beliefs and values on gender.


I'll say I do actually - find it amusing... Its hilarious to watch a board experience the consequences of its own beliefs and values on gender.


A long winded agreement.

Quote:
Why wouldn't people be confused, especially considering you both have the same opinion almost verbatim.

Lyssa wrote:

Confused? Maybe you haven't been following. That board has been in no doubt that 02Satyr was Sabina, and its that personality-obsession with those 4 trolls pushing all philosophical ideas to the back-burner which is the issue.


RE wrote:  
One of you is not thinking for him/herself.

Lyssa wrote:

Assuming you are addressing this to 02 Satyr, I'll leave 1/0 of him to reply to this.


I am addressing you in this instance, as under your name are his words and others apparently have visited here and have confirmed this.  

Satyr wrote:

Me in ChatBox, for some real-time debating.


Why not  excusively "You" behind "Your" avatar on this thread for some real-time debating.  

Lyssa wrote:

Why not you watch the film Identity starring John Cusack and tell me - Lyssa, what you thought of it?
Satyr is everybody here. Even I am him. I was recently told I apart from Satyr am also two other people on this board. I don't exist. I am not even a female. Satyr is a mega-Octopus, or a matrix mind alone, no body - he's a BOT simultaneously operating many avatars and many threads at one time.
Maybe Satyr's half-phantom, half-goat, half-woman, half-man, half-bot.. a transhuman intelligence... aissshhhh


Why not just tell me about it.

Lyssa wrote:

Look at the Heroine all Hot for Satyr jealously preventing Pretzle from taking him seriously...
btw., how do you know Pretzle is not Satyr, the other 0 "girl" involved as Sabina?
Can you be sure of anything?
mmm...



I am sure of this.
 
Your insistence about my attraction for Satyr, let's not go there again.  Instead why not re-read my post about you and your obsession with the man.  The very thought of a person who handles cadavers, has the hands with a smell of death on them and for me, this has the same abhorrence, as a butcher with blood under his fingernails.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 9035
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Thu Aug 29, 2013 8:37 pm

reasonvemotion wrote:

Lyssa wrote:

Quote :
Perpetual, Apaosha, Recidivist, Satyr gave their reasons and views on the matter of homosexuality. The Wowman all la di da uttered some heroine lines "this is going to be interesting" and " i'll play the game" - from an actress who comes to the set, wears make-up, delivers her lines, and packs up, this is normal and one expects no more from such an exotic creature rustling by in her silk and chiffon. At the max., she too would have quoted some line from Corinthians.
My view on homosexuality has already been expressed at length in the thread Deconstructing Adam.  Obviously you chose to ignore and as usual choose to distort.
How can I distort what I ignored? ha

Ah, I forgot. The quote by Karlen basically stating homosexuality was prevalent in ancient Greece. That was... so valuable.
And yes, you raised speculation on if pederasty was an abuse or not;
"While history portrays that only the man experienced pleasure, art and poetry indicate reciprocation of desire, and there are others who express the opinion that it is a modern fairy tale that the younger eromenos was never aroused."
That was very valid in the context of Mannequin saying he was not one.

There there. I hope now I have presented you well and in a shining light.


_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 9035
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

PostSubject: Re: gender and this site Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:41 pm

reasonvemotion wrote:

Why would he&she think it necessary to hide behind the same avatar, if not to deceive.  The deception is what people obviously feel uncomfortable about.

The point was to expose the lie of gender-insignificance they keep parroting...
And what deceiving, when he&she went knowing their IPs were open to the mods.
They understand it, Moreno has come here to say he does,, so why are you so bothered?

Quote :

Quote :
One of you is not thinking for him/herself.
Quote :
Lyssa wrote:

Assuming you are addressing this to 02 Satyr, I'll leave 1/0 of him to reply to this.
I am addressing you in this instance, as under your name are his words and others apparently have visited here and have confirmed this.  

I have no idea who you are referring to, who has confirmed this.
Be CLEAR and Specific, who are these people you talk about?
I have NEVER plagiarized Satyr here, not even Once.
If he and I sound similar to you, that cannot be helped.
I write from my heart; I don't even make any claims to philosophical intelligence. As you know, I have no substance. I'm a citation bot, nothing more.
Lately, I haven't had the chance to be reading, so I seem to be talking more, and quoting less; I'll have to break soon.

Quote :

Why not just tell me about it.

Because you are a movie buff and you might miss the experience of such a thriller film. If you can't be bothered, read the synopsis on wiki.


Quote :
I am sure of this.

You are sure pretzle is Satyr's other sabina? hhahaha

What gave it away?
 
Quote :
Your insistence about my attraction for Satyr, let's not go there again.

I won't, if you stop blemishing his image to all the people who come here.
You couldn't resist that Pretzle was taking him seriously, and so you had to give a warning and implant doubts and suspicions in her mind. You shouldn't accuse another if you have no proof.

Quote :
Instead why not re-read my post about you and your obsession with the man.

I have read this post, but where have you stated anything about my obsession with him? How am I obsessed exactly?
Or do you mean the prv. one where you warned me that he would use and discard me? That one?
I know you meant well; but I've already told you I am not in your way. And let me say in all seriousness, you are terribly mistaken about him.

Quote :
The very thought of a person who handles cadavers, has the hands with a smell of death on them and for me, this has the same abhorrence, as a butcher with blood under his fingernails.


Satyr handles cadavers?  And how did you arrive at that?  

Why do you fear death?
Did you not come from blood and mucus and the filth and the death of so many cells?

Don't you thrive on the meat the butcher kills who aids your hands from getting dirty, yet you abhor the butcher?

I can say in total frankness, I have never come across a more kinder, beautiful, gentler and rarer soul than Satyr.
There are very very few people I can count on one hand, whose being smells so clean, and he is one of them. And he's got the hands of a Cultivator.
And what are you? Anything better than a beggar waiting for praises for the chores that you may do for him, which was your "duty" anyway?
What is it that you hate about him so much anyway? Let me know if there's a real one - not this crap about male-female equality, etc. too boring.
This time I speak softly to you, because you are such a good sport.
Don't say the things you say again; I'll tear you into little little itsy bitsy pieces ; )

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*


Last edited by Lyssa on Wed Nov 05, 2014 5:26 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: gender and this site

Back to top Go down
 
gender and this site
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 3Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next
 Similar topics
-
» Receiver Site - Bad-Oyenhausen 1952-54
» Whats New on BAOR-Locations Web Site
» Newbie to site not shore what doctor to use!
» Interesting Web Site
» certificate of site inspection

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: