- Anfang wrote:
- That would also explain why the Jays like ugliness in art so much, it helps them along with their objective of dismantling the European elements in the West.
Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder after all but the beholder is not free and there is no such thing as a universal beholder or that all beholders are equal individual when it comes to seeing reality for what it is or what their destiny, their developmental trajectory, is about.
The arrogance hiding behind their pretentious humility is breathtaking.
It's an over-compensating hyperbolic defensiveness.
Abrahamics think the entire universe was created for them, and that they deserve eternal life and paradise, or an all-powerful all-knowing Being watching over them.
The sheer arrogance of this delusion is incredible...yet they declare themselves humble.
Moderns believe they are the creators of world - that they are gods, because they were born, and they can use words to declare things into existence, to project their abstractions outward.
They can declare their own reality into existence, simply by saying so.
This is why they accuse all of doing just that.
The social constructivism implies that humans are the ones holding their own destiny in their hands, when born...simply by being born.
Only humans...no other organism has this magical power.
Insecurity, using inversion to comfort, to hyper-inflate a deflating sense of self.
They feel like slaves, so they pretend to be masters of their won destiny. They feel un-free so they declare themselves detached from everything that inhibits their presumed liberty.
Try to connect words to phenomena.
Try to bring it down to earth, by connecting the mental constructs with the noumena, with the apparent, with phenomena.
Their reaction is predictable.
They will not, can not, accept an external standard of evaluating themselves and all else.
They must keep it subjective, so that it can mean anything they want words to mean.
They want it to relate to how it feels, in them.
If you try this with the concept of
beauty they regress to pleasure as their only available universal hiding place. Pleasure is esoteric, it is subjective....so they like to make it an end in itself - hedonism.
But, to connect beauty to symmetry and proportionality, takes that power of self-medication away from them....and it immediately makes them vulnerable to external judgments.
No, all words will be made esoteric, mystical, subjective. To hide the psychological motives they ought to remain vague, insinuating but never direct, never clear.
They will deny their own physical reactions, to maintain their mental detachments.
