From my perspective, MGTOW is a redundant terminology. Men have already "been going our own way" naturally. A movement is not required to reflect or encourage this.
I believe that all males are born anti social and socially unwanted (compared to innate female value).
Alright, then philosophize for me. What differences? And what in your and their psyche explains the conclusions made + what enviroment provoked it?
Firstly, the MGTOW and MRA movement is mostly humanist with the premise of human equality in place. Outright I disagree with that. I believe in inequality, and support inequality. I don't want people to be equal. And I don't want men to be "equal" with women. That is #1. The MGTOW and MRA proponents would dislike and reject me from that point straight away.
Secondly I attribute nature and biology to these mass discrepancies of "gender equality". This is another premise not shared among the MGTOW. Many MGTOW proponents blame feminism or "society". This is incorrect. Biology is the cause, is my argument.
Females are born privileged and with innate worth in life. Males are not born with innate worth. It is only within extremely artificial aspects of society, such as fundamentalist catholicism or islam, that males are born with "innate worth". In fact, I suspect that these were the first causes of the creation of mass religion, to address these problems, causes, and their effects.
In order to stabilize males in society, an artificial system was created, long ago, within christianity and other major religions. Males were made "equal", presumably with women. This is the logical fallacy and common error. The rendering equality of man, with women, does not reflect what nature is and what nature does.
Nature rejects males from society, due to the elements of conflict, argument, doubt, disruption, primarily over control of women. Men fight over the women, for sexual access.
Artifice was created to control this biological mechanism. Hence the creation of the abrahamic religions, christianity, judaism, and islam. Each of these is a reaction imposed upon their male proponents.
This also created the need to impose monogamy throughout human societies.
You barley even touched the surface, mainly just gave a generalization of the differences. Give me some individualized psychoanalysis, mostly yours. Delve deeper, if you brag about this kind of stuff, I don't know.
I don't have time offhand to dig too deeply. Of the leading MGTOW proponents, I like Karen Straugh and Bar Bar the most. I think these two offer the most interesting observations of the mix. Stardusk offputs me, something about the monotone voice of his. He seems pretentious to me and haughty.
If I were to psychoanalyze then I would look more deeply into Bar Bars videos. Karen Straugh is pretty easy to figure out. Her interest in MGTOW and MRA revolves around her son, and fear about the type of society her son is going to become indoctrinated into. That's obvious and common sense. Mothers of boys have much, much to fear about life. Daughters are easy. Since females are the privileged gender.
Being born a white female is essentially being born into automatic immortality. All you have to do in life, as a white female, is spread your legs. You don't even need to be choosy or discriminate, these days, due to liberalism and the freeing of the female libido. A white female is untouchable, today.
In the future, things will change, and I attempt to figure out and predict how global society is going to change.
I believe that challenges reflect the individual and group. Without a powerful female present, a beautiful one, then males have less need to "prove" themselves. Participants here will argue that "lies sa" and "phonee" are females worth fighting over, or for, but I disagree.
"Lies sa"?
That coming from you idiot, who called me a pedophile, and cannot even prove it...?
I Challenge you to show me proof.
I Dare you to show me proof.
But you can't. And that makes you the liar.
Many hide their simpleton-ness in their seeming complexity, but on the other side of the coin are those dunces like Neon who make it sooooo simple, that reality is simmered down to nothing but flashing mememememe...
Imagine reducing an Aryan female to being blond and blue-eyes only.
Imagine reducing male-friendship as a negative to the absence of females to fight over. The best friendships have even been born in war.
Imagine this clueless dunce defining Philosophy as agon when he sees friendship as a pacifism.
As to citations vs. this dunce's soft-porn rant,
There are two kinds of movement in this world. The centripetal and the centrifugal.
One cooks, and the other separates the cream from the milk.
One selectively condenses knowledge and the other deconstructs and splinters them into stands.
One contracts vast wisdom and collects into a symbol, a compact structure that silently speaks for itself, and the other expands wisdom and lets it flow out like a poetry, a radiation of light that brings out everything.
One is matter, the other is energy.
One is memory, the other is prophecy.
One is occult, the other is oracle.
I hope you remain clueless, dunce, because you give me a lot of laughter like nobody else.
You are the only one who can do that to me, and I'm grateful to your stupidity.
You would hate such a woman deeply. I hope I don't have to tell you why
Well.............biooooooooooooootch
When are you going to back your words up???????
Or am I going to have to strike this one out as another nothing female implication where a twat implies something that she never planned to follow through with anyway???
Excuses excuses bioooooooooooooooootch............I've heard em all.
Dumb twats never have anything interesting or intellectual to say.
A dumb twat needs to imply, innuendo, hint, and suggest what she means, lest she be guilty of ever actually holding an opinion of her own. Which she does not. Because she is a coward, making her, yes folks, a stupid twat.
A woman who stands alone and who is individual, self-sufficient, self-responsible, and proud, will now lower her head to you. Because she is intelligent, she is opinionated. She will often disagree with you.
Women are inferior at logic, rationalization, and reasoning. I daresay that women completely lack the reasoning faculty altogether. Since reasoning also requires justification.
phoneutria wrote:
Because she is analytical, she will not simply accept everything you say, she will study your words and expose your flaws. Because she has clarity of her ideas, she will not accept yours as truth when they come into conflict with hers. Because she is independent, she will not always have time for you. Because she is charismatic, you will often think she is self-centered. Lastly, because she is whole, in a relationship, she will not be interested in you for strength. She will want you for warmth, nurturing, affection... she wants your feminine side. She wants in you what you want in her. In other words, this WOWman you envisioned is your competitor. You will feel the spite grow in you and you would wish you could control this bitch.... but you can't.
Such ego in you, bioooootch. All unjustified, sadly. You have nothing to backup your claims with. You have no history behind you.
phoneutria wrote:
BTW I literally lose $1 for every minute I spend here.
Then leave, biooooooooootch.
Did somebody ask you to come here? No, of course not.
A WOWman who is individual, analytical, clear, independent, and charismatic will not bow to you. Because she is an individual, analytical, clear, independent, and charismatic.
Anybody see a flaw in this stupid twat's reasoning???
Yeah, I expected as much out of this profound, intelligent, deep, female thinker.
I expected less, actually. My standards, the bar I set, is on the ground at my feet.
You don't even know what I look like, you twat. You can't help emulating satyr, because you are nothing but his little bitch. You do me a favor and open a window over here, the stench of inadequacy is unbearable.
Can't a WOWman be or become independent? Do females even want independence? What is independence? I need some context. Does independence mean that I have $1 million in my savings account and can live a life of luxury? Is this "independence"? Does it mean not having friends and not relying on people, is that "independence"?
What is the difference between an independent individual and an independent society? Can a society become independent? Independent of what?
My reflex indicates that independence is non reliance. I don't need to rely on others or anything, really. But no absolutes. People do rely on others and things. For example life requires sexual reproduction. This creates a mutual reliance between males and females to procreate and reproduce. It's a concerted effort.
So life is not "independent" of males and females. An interaction, at least one, is required in mating. At least the males and females need to come together, just one time, to reproduce.
Or life is not possible for sexual organisms.
Let's just strike phonie out of this conversation. I don't think she can follow any longer....... at least not on pace with me.
She should find a slower thinker to emulate. Maybe a school for slow children is more along her line of mental quality? She could keep pace there.
