Know Thyself
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalSearchRegisterLog in

Share
 

 Methods of Mediocrity

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next
AuthorMessage
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptySun Jun 30, 2013 9:26 pm

In this thread I plan to address many of the common, and not so common methods of dealing with reality, as I perceive it, and describe it.
Granted, being someone who denies absolutes, considering them human artifices used to make sense of a reality which lacks them, I do not claim to be the holder of an absolute "truth".
Truth, after all, is a reference to a perspective which is complete, perfect, omniscient, eternal, and the only thing I claim is to hold onto a perspective which is superior, in this time and place.

Because reality is Flux, my interpretation of the given is up for review and will one day not be in harmony with the perceived....but, if I have an open mind I will adjust my perspective in accordance with changing circumstances, knowing that change does not occur in speeds which would make all perspectives irrelevant and that the challenge to every intelligent mind is to perceive patterns in the sensually perceived so as to construct models, abstractions, and then incorporate them in a cohesive internally consistent world-view, which will hold true for a longer, than the usual, time period.

I will say that up to this time I have come across very little which actually made me reconsider my positions, and I've never come across any opinion or insight which made me consider totally abandoning my positions.
My current opinions are the up-to-date adaptations of my world-view to all the challenges to it which were made from multiple internet minds. Some have contributed in making me fill-in a few details which I had neglected to consider, and for that I am grateful, but the vast majority have simply served to re-validate my positions with their assaults.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptySun Jun 30, 2013 9:56 pm

Here is the latest assault from one of the most mediocre types of minds, delivered to me in private:

JerryTheJew wrote:
You throw around the N word so liberally. I wonder do you talk like that in your day to day life, or are you just another internet troll hiding behind a computer, talking tough? You are lost in your own self illusions of superiority and false self perceived intellect. You attack people with morals and personal goals. You hate it when people take a stand for their own individuality and fight for a purpose. This is because you have no purpose, you stand for nothing and you are personally too cowardly to stand for anything. Instead you chose to sit passively by as the world goes spinning by out of your hands and out of control.  You fear reality because in reality you know you are just another do nothing siting behind a piece of plastic. Yes I am Jewish and for that you hate me. You hate Jews because we have an identity in a world that's lost, and you are lost.

In this tirade of verbal assaults, we see one of the most common forms of defensiveness.
The "Say it to my face" argument.
According to this not telling a homosexual boss, for example, what you think about him and his lifestyle, is "cowardice".

The tactic uses a form of shame, trying to manipulate masculine psychology.
What it implies is that unless you confront the one who you describe in ways that cannot be argued against, then your argument is  flawed.
Therefore, not telling a Negro what you think of his race, is an indirect debunking of your views.

The challenger has no argument to propose, so (s)he resorts to emotion and threats.
I would think that keeping your real opinions to yourself in an time when political-correctness has taken the form of an assumed, yet never stated, restriction, would be wise.
I would also not poke a bear with a stick, if I find myself in its neck of the woods.
We might say that "not speaking your mind" if it goes against he popular, regurgitated decree, is what one would call "civility."

There is also an allusion to a presumed self-interest.
I think I've gone into this before, but I will repeat it in brief here.

The average, mediocre, mind, cannot imagine a perspective which is not immediately and easily beneficial to it. That someone can hold an opinion that may be unflattering or that denies that easy hope msot are addicted to, and because it is part of a majority, it, naturally, assumes that all opinions must flatter and must benefit the one stating them, immediately and easily.
I say "immediately and easily" because a perspective can offer a heightened possibility, simply by having it, but a possibility does not mean that it is automatic and a guarantee.
For instance, knowing what materialism is and what the benefits of self-control are, may increase the possibility that one will develop a response to materialism or a desire to nurture self-control, but it does not necessarily mean one will succeed.

The mediocre mind cannot cope with such uncertainties and "tough love" attitudes. For it, an opinion must offer a facile and direct benefit...with no ambiguity and no added effort required.
Because of the reasons stated, such minds automatically assume that when a position is unflattering to them, it is wrong, and so it must be flattering to the one who dared propose it as a possibility.
It then constructs this straw-man to unleash the anger it feels for being forced to confront a possibility it had no considered and it dared not think about.

The last part is comedic, for anyone who actually knows what is happening here, so I will not address it.
I will only point to the "identity" argument, urging all to then connect my previous posts with the idea that only one people have identity, though it be as the eternal victims, and no others have one.
I will not go into the more ancient source of our identity, for, at the moment, we are studying the disease itself.
I remind you all of my definition of identity and how it is about the past.
I also remind you all of this particular identity: the life-hating, world-denouncing, nihilistic identity with being chosen to suffer on behalf of a singular Deity - the cult of victimhood, sweeping across the western world, as we speak.
It is an identity not with a genetic past, but with a mimetic one; a meme now trying to establish itself as a gene. A meme using feminine, insidious, seductive methods to deal with a foe it could not deal with in any other way.
To speak of the Jews as a "people" is to speak of a lie being repeated as if ti were true.
Shlome, Altzmon are two more recent Jews who have exposed the lie, and Weininger, Heisman and many others have exposed the other aspects of this infamous source of Nihilism.   

The one thing we can say, for sure, is that although it begins amongst the excluded, the meek, the ostracized, in one tribe, it quickly spreads across tribes...which are rejected due tot he particular nature of this infection which claims a special status.
This, of course, is the famous, and often repeated "hate" this sampling of depravity, mentions.
But it is a hate experienced by the lowest of the low of tribes who were denied access to this status of being God's chosen servants of pain and suffering...and one denied by the aristocratic mind, which feels no hatred for a virus that may infect it and may force it to die or grow stronger.   

Shall we repeat how the identity of the European man is being eroded by this disease?

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν


Last edited by Satyr on Sun Jun 30, 2013 10:28 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptySun Jun 30, 2013 10:21 pm

Another example of this mediocrity is in its reliance on word-play...semantics, to defend positions it cannot otherwise.
I've tried to explain my own positions on language: what it is, how it is used, why it unavoidably becomes a method of controlling the masses, how it confuses, even the most brightest, by turnnig the symbol of the real into a substitute for it...but I fear I have not said enough.
I am, once more, forced to repeat myself, opening myself up to accusations that I am verbose.

I've tried to be laconic, but this only makes the average, mediocre mind, gain a false sense of arrogance, thinking that my triteness is weakness.
I know that I should not be bothered by the beliefs of the simple-minded, but in this case allowing them to enjoy the slightest sense of comfort only exacerbates the predicament we find ourselves in.
These, simpletons, after all, are given a democratic vote.

But, allow me to repeat as briefly as possible:
A word is a mental construct; a symbol, a code, referring to a mental abstraction. In other words it is a mental artifice pointing back to a mental artifice.
It is a way of expressing, sharing, this mental artifice.

We immediately begin to sense a solipsistic trend, which, in fact, is what underlies most popular, populist, world-views in our time.

Now we become aware of two additional factors:
1- It is easy to understand why this self-referential method would be preferable to a mind abhorring the uncertainty and indifference of a reality it has little knowledge and even less understanding of.

2- For this method to remain sustainable over a long period of time, what will be required is a sheltering, protective, umbrella. A shield that may internally promote the ideas it then ignores, or considers naive, so as to remain effective as a shield. 
This results in a contradiction, necessitating internal dumbing-down and/or compartmentalization...or selective-reasoning....or Orwell's newspeak.  

#1 takes us back to my previous posting.
It reminds us that imagination unhindered by sensuality, or freed from that ghastly, deterministic reality, is what we call "fantasy" and if it reaches a particularly high degree of detachment form reality it is what we call "delusion".
We also know how dumbing-down is a degradation of all mental faculties, one of which is the mind's ability to imagine. We witness this more clearly in how minds, today, are incapable of creative thinking but must immerse themselves in the fantasies, imaginations of others.
See movies.
The insecure mind turns inward, not for strength but for escape routes.
Finding nothing there, as identity has been retarded and not allowed to develop, it then immerses itself in the eroticism of an otherness. It is, effectively, consumed, assimilated, in the thoughts, thinking, ides, ideals, of an otherness.
This is what we call "herd psychology", or better understood as slavery.
Imagine, if you will, if you can, trying to live-up to an other's ideals, opinions.

#2 points us towards the modern day practice of using two standards to measure one phenomenon, without being able to justify one or both, because doing so would expose the mind to the lie.

We also realize that this sheltering, although comforting and comfortable, is not without a cost...without a motive, because nothing in this life or any other we know of is for free.
In this case promoting internal genetic decline is a way of ensuring internal harmony. Technologies, techniques, then, attempt to deal with the collateral effects. The entire system is geared to implode, as the resources required to deal with these collateral byproducts, these genetic fallouts (pollutants) begin to exceed the aggregate energies at the sheltering system's disposal. The system requires an influx, transfusions, from other sources, to maintain its stability and the internal simulations that keep it going. Ergo, such anti-nature methods of population control and manipulation are obsessed with growth, and wealth, within its contexts is about pooling, accumulating, collecting. 
Their anti-natural ideals inevitably result in their disharmony within natural processes they are trying to "correct", replace, ignore.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptySun Jun 30, 2013 11:03 pm

Another example of mediocrity and its methods:
This, too, I've gone over before.

It is the old negative/positive dilemma....or perspectivism.

We can agree that a phenomenon is a phenomenon and is neither positive nor negative.
Having said that we must also agree that we, as living organisms with particular needs, are also a phenomenon; a phenomenon, with the ability to perceive phenomena...including self.
The latter, developing later, after some sophistication has taken place, whereas the former, perception of phenomena being an organism's method of dealing with otherness, so as to preserve its won capacity to remain the particular phenomenon that it is: one with the potential to direct itself efficiently and effectively, thusly increasing its possibility to remain intact.
Ordering in the Disordering.

Now, many have offered their own definitions of negative/positive, so allow me to offer my own feeble attempt at one:
For me "negative" is all that requires no effort to persist and to grow....i.e. entropy, darkness, cold, lifeless matter/energy (ordering)...this leaves the opposite - because the mind must begin to think by first positing binary extremes - of "positive" as that state of becoming, that phenomenon which requires constant and consistent energies to maintain itself and to grow: order, light, heat, life etc.

The projected binary extremes (dualistic poles) are, once more, mental abstractions...tools for orienting the organism within a reality in Flux.
Therefore, reality is this fluctuating combination of the positive/negative...neither one nor the other, yet existing as contrary to both.
This is why I described nihilism and absolutes as being feminine/masculine or negative/positive - God, the positive absolute, absolute order, being no less a nullifying end, than absolute disorder, randomness, emptiness, void, the feminine side of the singularity.
No sexism...there's a reason why this "towards entropy", this surrender to what requires no effort, is feminine in spirit and why the masculine is this towards Godliness..."Will to Power"....Will to Life.

Once all this is understood then we can proceed. We must begin by admitting that although positive/negative are in relation to the living organism, they are, nevertheless, useful categories.
A teleology is not required as this would be an attainment of the absent absolute.
Therefore, we may agree that death is neither positive nor negative from a detached objective perspective, but such a perspective is non-existent, as there is no god, and no absolute objectivity, but only varieties of subjectivity.
This variation in subjectivity constitutes an approach, but not realization, of the absent absolute.
It denies the common usage of perspectivism as a equalization method, where all perspectives are deemed equally possible, given that omniscience is absent.
No, that's what cowards and hypocrites do.
I say, that although there is no absolute "truth," because truth is a word denoting an absolute omniscience, a transcendental perspective, there are degrees of truth, which are superior or inferior, at any given time - the last takes into account the ongoing fluidity of reality, as (inter)activity.
But when we speak of reality we are not talking about a level of fluidity that would make all order impossible and inapplicable - life, being such an ordering, is present, proving that patterns still persists, at this temporal stage, and so some perspectives are more accurate, more precise, more aware, more sophisticated...more true than others.

What was I saying?
Ah yes...
So, albeit we can say, from an imagined detached, Beyond, perspective, that death is neither positive nor negative, we can also say that for a living organism death can only be a negation, a negative.
We can apply this to anything.
We can say that being a sexual mutation which is unfit is neither negative nor positive, but from a perspective of a living, breathing, organism, dependent on sexual reproduction to make its life have purpose and meaning, the mutation of homosexuality is distinctly negative, parasitical, and detrimental to the organism's future.
Same goes for stupidity. Although being a simpleton is neither positive nor negative, all things considered, we cannot help but admit, even if in private, that we all consider stupidity as a negative trait.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyMon Jul 01, 2013 7:44 am

Another tactic used by mediocrity is one used on PN, not so long ago.

The idea that a category says nothing about the particular.
It was in the context of "Spot is a dog; how tall is spot?"

This is an argument constructed on bad faith.
It does not care about discovering what language is and how it works, or what categories represent, but it seeks only to discredit to preserve the illusion that categories, in any context, but when it comes to humans, more importantly, do not apply, or are superficial.

If we begin with the ultimate category of EXISTS and define it - I've defined it as 'all which is (inter)active, or dynamic' - then we realize that categories are sub-categories of this one. Sub-categories enhance our understanding and what they represent, since activity is our basic element for existing, is potential, or possibility, and if said activity has a pattern, an ordering, it is about probability.
Probability being a higher state of possibility. When we say "probable" we mean that it has a higher possibility in regards to a projected ideal or projected goal or projected result.
In regards to a category, such as species, when we say giraffe we are saying that the particular phenomenon has the combined, general, attributes of a living phenomenon we then categorize and symbolize with a word: giraffe.
The "general" reflects an average, as these are established through observation, and designates an upper and lower extreme for each particular attribute, then combined in a pattern we call the species.
The same applies to a sub-category of a sub-category....so if dog is our starting sub-category of the sub-category canine which is itself a sub-category of the sub-category mammal , and so on, all the way up to "existing", then breed is a further enhancement of the particular.  
The general attributes of dog, being established as a pattern of potentials, the breed sub-category streamlines our understanding of the particular dog by further shrinking the probable, focusing it further.
Therefore, a breed, sub-category, is a lesser generalization, in comparison to the sub-category dog, just as dog is a lesser generalization in comparison to the sub-category mammal.
Each sub-category focuses our understanding by shrinking the probable.

If we are told that spot is a dog, we may not know exactly how big the particular is, but knowing the general pattern of what dog is, we can place it within a probability ratio.
If we are told what breed of dog it is, our probability ration shrinks or becomes more focused, more precise.
Of course absolute precision is impossible since flux means that the particular may be an exception to the rule, because it has been affected by environment in unpredictable ways.
But this does not make the categories unnecessary and inapplicable...otherwise no science would be possible.
What a category represents is a pattern of behavior, a pattern of (inter)activity.
Patterns can be broken or changed, but then the reason why they have changed becomes a factor.
Though we may not know how tall spot is we do know that it falls within an upper and a lower limit, from our experience with dogs.
The only reason this gap is big is because dogs, are a special type of phenomenon; one where humans have intervened upon its genetic potentials, promoting and/or inhibiting them in accordance to a desired outcome. But if we were to speak of wild dogs where only natural selection applies then the upper and lower limits would be closer to the average, or the median.

Same thing applies to all sub-categories when dealing with a species and with particular breeds, genetic branches of said species.
This also includes humans.

We can say that all science, - science being a human discipline trying to understand the world by categorizing it based no appearances (empiricism), and perceived patterns of behavior, (inter)activity.
Science does not study the particular separate from all experience with the same type. It places the particular within the context of a general category, as this has been established through observation.
It may not know, for example, the exact mass of a distant sun, but it can use the sensual data perceived to assume the upper and the lower limits of its potential mass. This is also important because a pattern is a fluctuation, and not a static THING, just as a particular human, a sub-category of the general type of homo sapient, itself a sub-category of primate, sub-category of mammal and so on.
A man is not the same within all temporal periods. A man is not the same as himself in the past or himself in the possible future.
Here, we see that it is "sameness" which is the illusion, the generalization, and not difference, not divergence.
Identity is based no a continuum held together in the observers memory or in the organism's memory....genes being a form of memory.
So, a man is a pattern exhibiting a potential, a probability, which is altering, as time goes by.
This pattern is based on the particular's performance, his previous (inter)actions. This is why one's own potential is unknown even to the one trying to attain his highest potential. Stretching the limits is a way of self-discovery, as it makes conscious the individual's upper potential.
In regards to race, or human breeds, as these have been established not through human intervention, necessarily - we exclude the intervention of slavery which selected for breeding individual humans based on potential productivity, which is a relatively recent development - but through natural selection: genetic isolation, inter-breeding, environmental conditioning, fauna, geography, climate, resource quality and accessibility, random natural occurrences (volcano eruptions, tsunamis, climate cooling, mass extinction due to meteorite hits, earthquakes, viruses etc.).
The physical effects can be easily noticed as a byproduct of all this past history, this sum of all previous experiences, nurturing (nature), but the brain divergences are more conscious and so more easily dismissed and denied existence, specially when human social conditioning also establishes a behavioral limit, creating a uniformity in thinking and acting within controlled social environments. But, having said that, if we are honest and our goal is to truly understand the human condition, rather than to create a comfortable, comforting environment in agreement with the popular, acceptable norms, then we can also witness this mental divergence through the observation of the particular sub-category (breed, type, race, kind) over a period of time and within many different contexts.
If we say that the presence of mostly individuals coming from one racial type at the 100 m. dash is coincidental or a product of social factors, then we must also apply a similar skepticism when to comes to the dominating presence of mostly one species in the fields of science and art...or one breed of dog dominating certain skills.
If we choose to arbitrarily apply different standards to the more controversial areas dealing with mind and psychology and intelligence, than we do when categorizing and understanding the physical, then we must first explain why this duality of mind/body still applies and what justification is used to explain why the brain is unaffected by environmental conditioning establishing a general potential, a higher or lower probability, when everything besides it is affected.
Then we must explain how consciousness evolves, if we believe that consciousness evolves and is not some mystical, transcendental power; and if consciousness evolves then how do the different levels of consciousness, we may call intelligence, come about, if, that is, we actually believe that a dog's intelligence is inferior to a human's, or a worm's consciousness is inferior to that of a cow.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyMon Jul 01, 2013 8:29 am

By far the most popular method of dealing with reality is the emotional one.

The argument consists in evoking feelings as a counter-argument or as a reason to withhold opinion or selectively perceive reality.
This tactic presupposes that the world is interested in our (re)actions to it, and that something making us feel bad makes it unreal or biased or undeserving of attention.
The tactic of burying your head in the sand or, up your arse, if you will.

This is related to the notion of positive/negative.
The belief that reality is innately "good", is guided by a Judeo-Christian world-view; one which still underlies the psychology of even diehard atheists (Marxists) or secular humanists (liberals).  
God is good and when "god is dead" the "goodness" still lives on, in human form.
This presupposed "goodness" then becomes a moral stance, where ethics becomes some kind of universal law, a natural force, akin to gravity, thermodynamics, electromagnetism.

Although it is not stated outright it is always alluded to that despite the evidence, contrary to our experience with reality  -  no matter how sheltered and deprived it may be - no matter what we see in nature  (and not in controlled social environments where hypocrisy and behavioral limits and indoctrination is a factor, but within nature unaffected by human contrivances and human interventionist) that all of this is inconsequential, an illusion, false, because underlying it all is some "goodness" that always wins out: it can be called "karma", divine grace, poetic justice, morality or whatever else the mind comes up with to maintain a comforting delusion which is contradicted by the world itself.

This is a perfect example of nihilistic thinking.
Though the world shows us that entropy is increasing, that order is rare, that life is the exception to the norm, and that science tells us that everything is veering towards absolute randomness (chaos), that despite this all is "positive" because the apparent is an illusion and underneath this reality there is an even more real reality, where the exact opposite is true.
Therefore, your senses evolved not to aid you in the world, in existence, but to test you, trick you...challenge your faith.
Here the real is set-up as a hellish, negative state...ergo nihilism offers the more positive, preferable world (paradise, utopia). This is the nihilistic reversal of consciousness; the Orwellian newspeak.

From this starting emotional foundation we get to the position that if the other insults us, or contradicts our undeserving self-esteem, or makes us question our own falsely created identity, then he is to be dismissed, ignored, or assaulted on a personal level. the assumption here is that if a position makes us feel bad then the one proposing it to us is trying to hurt us: motive is presupposed as the reason for our own emotional (re)action to a perspective. This does not apply to the "positive" feelings. Nobody tries to find a motive behind another making us feel good. In this case we focus on the end result, the feeling of pleasure, goodness, itself. We do not question the motive because we do not want to risk losing the feelings.
The reverse is true when we are made to feel bad. There, the feeling is focused on and denied, rejected, and the motive is always proportionally as "bad" as the feeling it produces: a bad feeling must be rooted in a bad motive.
The idea of tough love or of indifference - that is of stating a fact unconcerned about any emotional appeal or possible (re)action to it - is never considered.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
Lyssa

Gender : Female Posts : 8965
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyMon Jul 01, 2013 1:55 pm

Satyr wrote:


JerryTheJew wrote:
You throw around the N word so liberally. I wonder do you talk like that in your day to day life, or are you just another internet troll hiding behind a computer, talking tough? You are lost in your own self illusions of superiority and false self perceived intellect. You attack people with morals and personal goals. You hate it when people take a stand for their own individuality and fight for a purpose. This is because you have no purpose, you stand for nothing and you are personally too cowardly to stand for anything. Instead you chose to sit passively by as the world goes spinning by out of your hands and out of control.  You fear reality because in reality you know you are just another do nothing siting behind a piece of plastic. Yes I am Jewish and for that you hate me. You hate Jews because we have an identity in a world that's lost, and you are lost.

Is this a reaction from a particular youtube video or comments you made there?

@JerryTheJew,

And what if your jewish identity is what promotes goals and morals that are anti-worldly, nihilistic, and cowardly escapisms?

And what do you personally make of your Israel when it discriminates against Blacks settling there while promoting multiculturalism everywhere else in the world? You want to speak of double-standards of trolls sitting in their rooms,,, let me see you honestly address Israeli double-standards.

Calling any realistic criticism immediately as "Hate" shows your passive thinking and how afraid you are to dig deep and search yourself honestly. You fear reality.

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyTue Jul 02, 2013 10:07 am

Lyssa wrote:

Is this a reaction from a particular youtube video or comments you made there?
Who knows?
Who cares?
It's his little vengeance.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyTue Jul 02, 2013 12:23 pm

A favorite and comforting lie - one adding to the soothing delusion that a perspective should be judged by how it makes us feel, rather than by how accurately it explains and represents our experiences in reality: The majority can't be wrong.

This is a supportive component in the "equality" bullshit mythology.
Essentially, what it attempts to justify is the idea that because all minds are equally endowed, that the majority of minds will always believe in what is closest to the real.
Any mind contradicting this position is either "ill," or has an intention contrary to the shared truth, and so must be resentful or guided by some false sense of self-confidence, or is motivated by some other reason, contrary to establishing the facts about reality.
This is "reality, by democratic decree".
Democracy is, of course, a political system representing a capitulation of reason to necessity, and one the ancient Greeks themselves did not fully respect.
In our times Democracy is but the political ideology reflecting equality, or the uniformity of potentials.
The "one mind one vote" does not only achieve parity - equating the choice of the wise with that of the moron - but it leads to a decline in quality, as the majority will always be the expendable byproduct of natural selection which, in this case, is given undeserved consideration and respect, and "rights" which conflict with natural standards concerning quality of mind/body.
The majority, in nature, are produced because within austere natural environments there is a lot of predation, waste, genetic drift, losses due to diseases absence of opportunity, randomness we call "luck" and/or chance.
To compensate nature produces abundance so as to increase the possibility for survival.

This would also explain why male and female births, in our human species, are almost equal, though males are more expendable than females, and they are more easily excluded from the genetic pool.
Once men intervened upon the natural processes so as to allow the survival of more males, necessary to the survival of the tribe, state, empire, it followed that these males would be given the possibility for passing on their genes and for having a voice within the tribe they were asked to serve.
Paternalism, as they call it, gives rise to the possibility of a theoretical political parity.
This remains theoretical because the leader of the tribe and his opinion always trumps that of the masses.
At first it does not matter, because tribal homogeneity makes the leader a natural representation of the best and the brightest of his own clan, of his own bloodline.
Success leads to a collateral effect.
Growing populations increase specialization, which then increase the disparity between those specialized in fields essential to the tribe and those specializing in fields of secondary, supportive importance; it also produces increasing heterogeneity, as the population is inflated by the influx of peoples who belong to inferior tribes, attracted to order/power, and the excess of resources this produces.
The inferior, again, exceed the superior...and so the tribe is slowly inundated by growing numbers of inferior stock. At first they take on the role of slaves or supportive work essential but too time consuming for the native group. Seizing the opportunity leisure provides a genetic superiority births a culture, and then a civilization, as all these masses have to be controlled and ordered and guided, using laws, norms, procedures, bureaucracy, ideologies.
Numbers swell, and the quality is overrun by quantities, as those of quality are now more interested in creative activities (leisure) rather than in toil.
Decadence ensues.

Democracy and the egalitarian ethos is born in this stage of decay.  
Sparta was pulled down by this softness, manifesting in a love for comfort, luxury, symbolic value (wealth).      
In this environment the "self-evident" lie of parity of potential finds fertile ground and it becomes an "innate" memetic disposition.
We are living in the aftermath of generations of this ideological indoctrination.
Not only do we consider it "logical" that all deserve respect (respect being a form of intimidation), but also that all deserve propagation, and that all opinions are worth considering.

Some methods of filtering out stupidity do come about but these also become methods for ignoring the undesirable or for controlling ideas.
Today, we are more likely to lend our ear to the mundane, the idiotic, than to someone who challenges our established, comforting, comfortable, world-views.
Politeness is  the perfect excuse for dismissing anything that disturbs, disrupts, and like with controversial theories concerning conspiracies, putting all these ideas or perspectives in one box, is an easy way of throwing out the 'baby with the bathwater.'
Consider how questions about the 9/11 events are now included in the same category as UFO abductions or Big Foot sightings....and then consider how "trolling" is being used to exclude, from consideration, the disturbed and purposefully disruptive, along with the ones offering positions considered "evil", "debunked" controversial, too insulting or hurtful to be taken seriously, etc.
The majority, and how many are hurt, insulted, disturbed out of their self-evident complacency, is the measure of what is to be called civil, serious, of value.

Civility is a code-word, meaning, mediocre, average, the middle-ground. To cross it means that you are now proposing something that more people than not feel hurt by.
But it goes further, because of the shared "rights", lie.
If one person is insulted or hurt, then the idea, the opinion is flagged as potentially "bad", "evil", motivated by something other than intellectual integrity.

Democracy is built on mass participation and the masses is its foundation.
Therefore, the only measurement of quality it can allow is one of quantities. It has no ability o determine or to consider anything demanding a judgment dealing with quality; it feel inhibited by shame, by morals, by uncertainty to consider doing so.
Since numbers, the codes of modernity, is all which is permitted - though numbers are also ambiguous and baseless - it surrenders to statistics, the popular vote, what sells, what is popular.
The standard shifts to how much a product (thought, idea) makes the many happy.
Feeling bad, being made to feel bad, being forced to reconsider things one needs to remain sane or feel good about one's self, is an automatic dismissal.

The conception of reality turns to a hedonistic appeal: make me feel good, or be silent, or face the consequences.
Reality becomes a benevolent, good-natured, state, encompassed within rules and regulations ensuring the well-being of all; all except those who confront and contradict this basic requirement.
Who would deny pleasure, but a sick mind or one with ulterior motives or one finding pleasure in the other's pain?
Sadomasochism becomes the alternative label for fascist.

We love those who give us some kind of hope - hope being the antidote to existential angst/fear - ergo anyone who takes away hope is hated or hateful.
Love becomes the mystical term describing the hope-giver: Jesus of Nazareth, God, the cult leader, the spiritual guide, the leader, priest, teacher.
The easier the hope, the more universal, the less effort it requires, the more hopeful it is...ergo, all opinions not offering immediate gratification, demanding nothing more than a shift in attitude, a repression of self, a seductive escape from a less malleable aesthetic conception, is the most attractive, the more lovable, the most seductive lover of all.
Our feminine side is swept off its feet, and raised up to the heavens.

"Kiss, me, love me, give me hope, offer me promises, a promise, shelter me, safeguard me, protect me, possess me...make me yours!!!"
All the girls swoon.
The most adorable one is the one all the girls want to be taken by.

Have you met your God, yet?
Don't look at me...I'm the anti-dote, the anti-god, the anti-Christ.
Through me despair, and a need to find hope inside of yourself. Not hope in delusion, in romantic idealism, but in endurance, in compromises, in a shattering laugh against the inevitable.

Who, the hell, are you to ask me for hope, when I was never given any; when I had to make it myself?
Whatever I needed I took, or I constructed on my own....and when I could not I learned to do without.
If you wish to be taken, by being given hope then do not be surprised if I do with you as I please, when I please, how I please.
To be given you must give.
If you wish to receive hope from me, through me, then be prepared to be taken.

If I am to offer something then it is what has always been right in front of you, though you turned your eyes away.
I offer you what confronts and challenges. How you will respond is not my problem.
I only wish to observe you (re)acting, because I sharpen my own reflexes in that way.

I scream, because you are in a deep trance:
"LOOK!!! See it? It has been there all along. Unconcealed, it just waited to be seen by one who could bear the sight."

And if the calf is encompassed in a mass of beefy bodies, when the wolf comes sniffing, what of it?
How long will it find a warm, safe place, in the center of the herd, and how many bodies can protect it from reality for an eternity?
Time is my master.
I watch time lay waste and pull asunder; I watch time build and destroy, turning all into a fine, uniform sandy desert.
The sun's energies dissipate. The uniform surface grows unbearably hot, while deep down cold grips the moisture, and pulls it downward in clumps.
How deep will you dig to wait for the cooling rains; how long will you withstand their sweeping force?

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyTue Jul 02, 2013 1:07 pm

We may all forage and hunt on the same fields, but some never swallow; the nutrients never become digested, they never become integrated into the body, excreting the toxins out as waste to fertilize new crops.
Some chew and then regurgitate to chew some more. They mull things over indefinitely.
Their teeth turn flat and dull; appropriate for endless mastication.

The eternal skeptics, the one who cannot decide, the procrastinating dullards, who fail to find adequate reasons to come to a conclusion, to take a stand, to utter a word.
The data is too ambiguous, the differences are too small; the information is sketchy, indefinite, and they have no courage to take the risk and pay the possible price for coming to an opinion.
They want to be given a reason, a deciding will to have an opinion.
When none meet the criteria, they settle for being undecided, uncertain, unable to say one way or another; all opinions have merit, all arguments are equally enticing.
They call themselves “open-minded” when what they are is intellectual cowards, standing behind whatever is most ubiquitous, yet apart, wanting to remain distinct and special in their indistinguishable essence, in their non-committal dubiousness.

That’s the best place for them: behind, so as to not be held accountable, and slithering to the side, to pretend that they are not of the same kind as those who are fanatically committed to the absurd absolute.
The “truth,” for them is out there...just as for the naive girl the “prince” is on his way.
One day (s)he thinks this, and the next another charmer takes over; reluctant to totally give-in just in case something better comes along.
Yes, even little boys become stuck in a state of womanly indecisiveness.
Uncertainty in one’s own judgment becomes an intellectual virtue.

Such minds do not escape mediocrity; they hover over it, next to, it, behind it, not wanting to commit to it, as well. They are pulled in by the gravity of mass, but they never crash land into it.
They live and die never daring to see, because when they look all they see is haze, clouds of smoke, ill-defined boundaries, and what they need is that evasive absolute.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
Lyssa

Gender : Female Posts : 8965
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyTue Jul 02, 2013 3:34 pm

Satyr wrote:
Lyssa wrote:

Is this a reaction from a particular youtube video or comments you made there?
Who knows?
Who cares?
It's his little vengeance.

Well, for someone who calls you a coward for never telling things to someone's face in the open, he certainly is B.R.A.V.E. saying things in a private msg. than debating here out in the open.

The centuries of black slavery in the past and in the present by jewish ideologists never gets mentioned - the art of policing and politics has become that ingrained, now the *N 'word' sounds more nasty than the reality practised by them. The ones who are actually enslaving, try to shame the other for using a word that wasn't even considered negative for a period;

"During the fur trade of the early 1800s to the late 1840s in the Western United States, the word was spelled "niggur", and is often recorded in literature of the time. George Fredrick Ruxton often included the word as part of the "mountain man" lexicon, did not indicate that the word was pejorative at the time. "Niggur" was evidently similar to the modern use of dude, or guy. This passage from Ruxton's Life in the Far West illustrates a common use of the word in spoken form—the speaker here referring to himself: "Travler, marm, this niggur's no travler; I ar' a trapper, marm, a mountain-man, wagh!" It was not used as a term exclusively for blacks among mountain men during this period, as Indians, Mexicans, and Frenchmen and Anglos alike could be a "niggur".
By the 1900s, nigger had become a pejorative word. In its stead, the term colored became the mainstream alternative to negro and its derived terms." [[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]]

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyTue Jul 02, 2013 7:58 pm

It's the sheer volume of words, the ease in accessing and sampling the words of others that fills the breast of the average mediocre mind with jaded confidence.
He's heard it all; he knows of it.
He may have munched on it for a time, before he spat it out to return to the usual routines.
We have television, computers, movies, all offering us a touch of everything: every spice, every concept, every perspective. We can pick and choose, according to taste, only to try something else tomorrow.
Ideas bounce in the head, never coalescing into something useful, something tangible.
Information overload, where nothing is ever appreciated fully: the culture of recycling, artistic repetition, with a primal heartbeat, in the familiar rhythms of a musical style.
The established is not in question, for it allows to question everything else, besides.

The comfortable industrialist, can discuss Marxism with the unemployed anarchist, because the ideas have been stripped of their dangerous, their effectiveness.
They are t-shirt logos on the chests of the youthful nouveau riche, depicting dead revolutionaries; conversation pieces that lead nowhere but to lost time; entertaining vehicles of avoiding the settled.

The internet provides this ready medium of sampling ideas: a pooling of wisdom and insights that can be sampled with a few dollars a day.
No thinking required...click and read.
Retain in memory long enough to make a sensation, then leave the words fall back into the subconscious where the repetition of the word can stimulate it back to life.
All can partake, all can taste, all can use and throw away.

Individual qualities lose their effectiveness, when behavior is restricted - options denied - and when pretentiousness is aided with training.
Then it becomes a matter of perceiving the talented liar from the average one.
And who better to accuse the other of hypocrisy than the biggest hypocrite of all?
Fortunately pretense cannot exceed its own limits, and so humor, the ability to divert using the constant cynical mirth of the inwardly insecure, saves the facade from breaking.
Nothing is unknown, nothing is mysterious, mystical....everything is out in the open.

Everything becomes a joke because we've heard it all....at least the words.
You can say anything you like believe in anything you wish to believe in, just as long as you do not take it seriously, because to think there is an escape out of this status quo can only be taken as a tired joke.
You are telling the audience that has most to lose from taking you seriously of something they will never allow to go beyond the distasteful allegory.

Yes, they've heard it all, they've read it all; the words have passed through their ear canal and the pulsations have made the eardrum vibrate.
They've heard it so often that they've become used to the sound of the words, and the automated responses to them.
They begin to believe that this habituation constitutes an understanding.
Like cows in those proverbial fields, they've tasted every weed, so often, that they begin to believe they've digested it all.
Most of it passes right through them, never leaving anything behind, because their constitution, aided by years of training, has automated the way they deal with certain fodder, but the taste remains on their tongues, with the usual automatic responses.
They recognize the taste, and they've been told how to deal with it.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyWed Jul 03, 2013 2:03 pm

Just to add to all the bullshit confusion created by a system dedicated to repair the “mistakes” of the past (nature), so as to construct the illusion of parity, we get this obsession with corrective (plastic), surgery.
We are at this moment at a historical juncture where we cannot tell if the other is male or female.
The delusion of nature’s irrelevance is accentuated with push-up bras, girdles, toupees, breast, and buttocks, implants, and let us not forget the artificial impressions make-up and hairstyles can produce.
And, so, we have it, the liberal ideal world, where the artificial becomes a justification for the dismissal of all appearances.
The lie, justifies the idea that all which we perceive is a lie.
It says: “Look at how well I can hide, mask, change, alter, what nature has created; look at how wonderfully I can seduce and trick you.”  
If nature is so brilliantly and creatively manipulated, then what hope does a mere agency of nature have?

Man intervening upon nature, upon the manifestations of the past as it were, is a argument that proposes the easy and so enticing, idea that no matter what, no matter how or where or when, you, can be “healed” from your past.
How attractive, how appealing, how much power does this simple idea have over those who exists, in the here and now, because they were permitted, given the “right”; the ones who were sheltered, their parents indoctrinated in ideologies, moralities, that made them possible?  

Do you have the fortitude to really look yourself in the mirror and admit, ADMIT, what you are, and from where you come from?
Don’t fret too much; you’re not part of a minority. Very few can do so.
This is why nihilism is so enticing, so mesmerizing, so seductively, erotically, appealing.
Did you actually think that to “Know Thyself” meant you would discover all sorts of comforting, flattering, conveniently in agreement with what you wish to believe, possibilities?
Did ya?
Were you THAT naïve and cowardly?

-------

Conduct a test, if you dare.
Correct that big nose, that receding hairline or chin, that cellulite, that gut, those sagging jowls, and then dare to have children.
Do you think nature gives a shit about you and your insecurities?
Woop, there it is....over and over, again.

Read a book, regurgitate the text, repeat it verbatim, put that edumucation, you paid so dearly for, to good use....then try to defend your lies before a Satyr, like I.
How long before you go running for the safety of those "safe" havens where idiocy can speak its mind, no matter how simplistic and obtuse it might be?
But what is Satyr but another corrective agency of anture, like culling, like cuckolding, like...death?

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyWed Jul 03, 2013 3:40 pm

The common, average, mediocre mind, functions under the premises of (re)action, though he or she may not be fully cognoscente of it, or may even deny it as a motive or a factor. 
He wants to elicit an emotion, a response, to feel important, like he or she matters.

The content, circumstances, contexts are, but only, slightly relevant; what is most important is the (re)action, the automatic, innate, sensation, the instinctual response, the real (re)acting despite the mind's cynical defensiveness. 
For this reason, (s)he will project this motive in anyone raising an emotional response in him/her.
The controversial one, will be understood as someone who is trying to gain attention, to raise an emotional (re)action, to "troll." 
No other motive can be imagined or understood, as the mind can only take itself as an example to extrapolate the unknown.
(S)He does not care, so much, about theories, ideas, ideals, reality, he or she only cares about pragmatism, and him/her being affected is a sign that the one (s)he is dealing with is on her/his level.
His/Her immediate, instinctual, uncontrollably intuitive, (re)action, is, like for the "adrenaline junky," a sensation of realism (s)he need not contemplate, or analyze, or understand, for (s)he can feel it.
The entire conversation becomes about emotion/sensation and producing it, replicating it, reciprocating it, in the other.
(S)He does not give a shit about ideas, about reason, about the quality of the argument, all (s)he cares about is his/her own (re)action to it, and about replicating it.
If you fail to seduce him/her, produce some sensation in him/her, then you do not matter to him/her.
Your appearance, reasoning, intelligence, is inconsequential, because, a this point, all that truly matters, is chemistry. 
How does (s)he make you feel.

This is the epitome of feminization, or men being reduced to the level of a child or a woman; individuals who must produce an automated (re)action in the other to feel good about himself/herself.
It is why "trolling" is the first label to be projected.

If the other tries, in the mind of the observer, but fails, to create an emotion, then he is a "weak" troll, a common one; if he produces some slight tinge of an emotional (re)action then the "troll" is talented, good enough to be tolerated.
The individual wants to feel the sensation of living, of existing, and being sheltered makes him/her feel bored, jaded, unimpressed by what he or she has seen before.
The more (s)he senses, experiences, all the more difficult it becomes to "impress" him/her. 
(S)He is becoming numb, dull, unaesthetic...dull. 
(S)He must be screamed at to listen, pinched to feel, exposed to hyperbole to begin to notice.
(S)He is reduced to a mindless, decaying zombie; a member of the living-dead, requiring constant infusions of brain-matter, no matter how mundane, to keep on going. 
So, far the ideas do not come into play, if they ever do come into play; what matters is sensation, the experience of existing, in a world protecting, dulling the senses, so that instead of stress ennui engulfs the mind.
Nothing mattes to him/her because (s)he is protected from caring.
But (s)he does not know this; all (s)he knows is that the world is repetitive, boring, inconsequential, another artificial reality to cope with or to reboot. 

There is not even a hint of wanting to see, to know, to understand; what matters is to feel, to sense, to emote. 
The reduction of the individual to that of an animal state.
to not only think within the moment, to live within the confines of a temporal box, but to only be able to comprehend feeling, emotion, sensation.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyWed Oct 30, 2013 7:36 pm

The Mediocre nihilistic mind, seduced by the either/or simplification, finds in perspectivism a saving grace.
With it all positions are equally valid, because words can be switched around when they are detached from phenomena.
This flexibility of the word, is what makes these minds of the Book, by the book cynical about all conceptions which do not flatter them or help them deal with a reality they cannot deal with.
Using semantics and verbal acrobatics they can escape all possibilities, equating them with their opposite.
Once equalization has been achieved then it becomes a matter of convenience, and feeling.
Emotion is the final arbitrator for all modern mediocre minds, totally immersed in nihilism.  

Here is how you chop that crutch to pieces:
You define terms, by connecting them to real life phenomena.  

For example:
The idea that positive and negative are a matter of perspective, and interchangeable concepts, fails once you define positive as that which requires energies, effort, to come about and to maintain itself, and the negative as that which requires no energies and no effort to maintain itself.
A concept is only interchangeable and a matter of personal taste when it is detached from reality.

Once you define a word, by connecting the concept it refers to to a real world perceived phenomenon, then you force the nihilist's hand.
He will then be forced to offer a counter definition, which will expose his simplicity and how detached from the world he is, or he will engage you in the area of the emotional, the personal hoping to either silence you, suing shame and guilt, or to make you reciprocate, so as to them accuse you of ad hominem attacks.
A third option is for him to find an excuse and to flee. usually a declarative statement accompanied by faked, exaggerated, mirth or boredom, suffices.  

The "personal" is where the modern mediocre mind thrives.
All must be reduced to the personal, the emotive, the sensational.  

Remain focused on the perceived.
The dualism can now be related to experience, and it cannot be flipped according to whim, nor equated as if all opinions are equally possible - reduction of probability by leveling it all down to a uniformity of possibility.

The nihilist also exposes himself when he tries, because uniformity, equality of possibility is another way of saying: chaos.

-------------------------------------

What is a pattern?
A reduction of possibility: a probability.
THAT is what order is.
And what is life?
An ordering.

Consider the concept carefully.

Probability, ordering, is a reduction of possibility.
Something has a pattern of behavior means that its behavior is not random, but exhibits a predictability, and has no infinite possibilities.
This reduction manifests as a detachment from the Flux, a partial and incomplete one.
Life displays this with the creation of a membrane boundary, detaching itself from the increasing randomness so as to impose within its porous boundaries some degree of order, of probability.
This is life's pushing away, ordering, rejecting.
With this it gains choice, later to evolve into a Will.

And this is exactly what consciousness is: discrimination means a detachment of the generalized/simplified particular from the background temporal noise, the Flux.
When I perceive I discriminate, I discern the more particular within the general: I become aware of a more refined pattern, a more precise form of order.  

-------------------------------------

The same process of defining concepts by connecting them to the perceived, can be repeated within all context and in regards to all concepts symbolized by a word.
The nihilist prefers to remain on the level of words, on the symbol, within ambiguity and/or infinite possibilities. This is what he calls "freedom". Liberation from the world, from the perceived, from the past ...from nature.
Debating only symbolically as if the word had nothing to do with the perceived world.
This linguistic flexibility, this ability to detach the symbol, the abstraction, from reality is what nihilists find the most soothing and "positive".
He can now reinvent himself, because the shared practice is protected by a higher Will: System, God, State, Law.  
This is sheltering.
Such minds, liberated from the real, can now indulge in fantasy, in the supernatural, in the fantastic.

Words are no longer tools, but playthings.

Notice how casually a nihilist uses terms like love, respect, freedom, equality.
Particularly the term love is for him a nothing word, used so often that it has lost all substance: an empty word.
Listen and watch pop-culture. All about love.
It's a shared reaffirmation of a shared lie.
This requires upkeep, particularly because it is so detached from reality.
When a word has no reference to anything outside the skull, it must be repeated, to keep it alive within the minds that share in its artifice.
A word referring to something real, apparent, needs no such reaffirmation because the real is present, and the word simply symbolizes it.
 
This is typical of nihilism.
Words have no reference to anything real - they have no gravity, no mass, they are airy, free of the real, the cost, the risk the attachment to the worldly - and so they can be used carelessly, flippantly...like a child playing with a toy.

Repeat the practice of connecting what the nihilist tries to disconnect.
Connect the word artificial and natural to a perceived phenomenon.
Define it within the aesthetic, the empirical, and watch them squirm.

The nihilist is addicted to words, or to human abstractions. He detaches from reality, because that's what he wishes to annul, and redirects the concepts back to a human artifices. He always refers and defers back to abstractions with little or no reference to anything sensually perceived.  

Define male and female, for them, and watch them scramble to save their disconnected redefinitions.
Some will go as far as to deny sex determining relevance, making it into a choice.  
They will then try to accuse you of artificial definitions, when it is they who are inventing concepts with no reference to anything real.
a good example is the case of sexual types.
For the modern mediocre nihilist it is sexual roles which are artificial, and manmade, and not the elimination of them.
Gender is the key word. Once you detach the cultural application of a sexual role from its nature, you can accuse the opposition fo what you are the most guilty of.
The nihilist wants to build an ideal world by using eugenics, imposed through morals and cultural standards, but will accuse others of this first, as a defensive tactic.  

They will do the same with race, or any pattern pointing to a past which cannot be avoided nor altered.

The modern nihilists prefers the immediate, the flexibility of the current, and the ambiguity of the coming future.
The past is what they want to detach from and to forget.
It is immutable and cannot be reasoned away. No word can change its imposing presence, its appearance, its nature.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyTue Jun 10, 2014 1:20 pm

The common retard will attack you on a point that makes him/her feel bad about self, and the choices (s)he has made.
They will isolate a word, and focus on it, avoiding the context, or how it applies in a general context...within a broader perspective.
He will insist that the word, and the concept it refers to, is self-contained, self-referential, the end itself.

The object/objective will be obsessed over...detaching it from all other collateral considerations, so as to bring about a desired outcome.

The common retard will attack without having a clue what your positions are, admitting that he cannot be bothered with trying to understand, or with going through text...which is always too much.  
If you are brief, you are not clear, if not, you are verbose.
He prefers the snippet, the soundbite, the brief, simplistic, encapsulation, to get to the meat of the problem they are facing, by disconnecting it from the world at large.
The word becomes the all-inclusive concept....the END.
He uses it to imply an understanding he cannot demonstrate...and so he refuses to go beyond it.   

The common retard will demand you pay special consideration to him and his arguments, though he has not bothered to show the same towards yours.
He skims, and when he believes he understood, he attacks, then expecting you to not skim through his ramblings, which have little, if anything, to do with what you are saying, and why you are saying it.

The common retard will pretend he did not mean what he said - if he ever dares to come out from behind some famous figures shadow - but he will not clarify because he wither has no clue, or having been discovered as being a moron, he wishes to distance himself form his own opinions, by pretending they are other than what was implied with the words he used.

This also relates to the other tactic of pretending to be more complex than your words.
You cannot be placed into a general type because you are special, or intricate....even if all you can offer are intuitions, emotions, sensations, declarative sentences, quotations...

The common retard assumes he's cornered you because you refuse to respond to an often repeated position - exposing how not complex he is - or because he is arguing against a straw-man, based on his inability to comprehend what is being said, thinking you refuse to respond because his arguments are formidable, when they are simple and stupid and popular.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν


Last edited by Satyr on Tue Jun 10, 2014 1:54 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Guest
Guest



Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyTue Jun 10, 2014 1:45 pm

He'll take a little phrase like "spontaneous" or "just because" ... "  and focus on it, avoiding the context, or how it applies in a general context...within a broader perspective."...


Common retard, dear? How self-deprecating.

Let me guess, are you being facetious?

Wink
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyTue Jun 10, 2014 1:50 pm

In all seriousness now, a question:

Satyr wrote:
This also relates to the other tactic of pretending to be more complex than your words.
You cannot be placed into a general type because you are special, or intricate....even if all you can offer are intuitions, emotions, sensations, declarative sentences, quotations...

Have you attempted to place yourself into a general type?
Back to top Go down
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
Lyssa

Gender : Female Posts : 8965
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyTue Jun 10, 2014 4:01 pm

phoneutria wrote:
He'll take a little phrase like "spontaneous" or "just because" ... "  and focus on it, avoiding the context, or how it applies in a general context...within a broader perspective."...


Or so some would like to feign that a broader perspective wasn't taken into account, because one's condescending attitude and over-bearing ego [while speaking of fancy phrases of strength from genuine humility of walking "barefoot on the earth"] saves them from having to deal with who They Are.
One will try to challenge an "ignore me", a freezing, while they and they alone get to speak into the air, and then the image of the "unreplied" word left standing means guess what? That's right. Superiority demo.ed.


Quote :
Common retard, dear? How self-deprecating.

Let me guess, are you being facetious?

Wink

Was he?

Mirror, mirror on the wall...

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
Lyssa

Gender : Female Posts : 8965
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyTue Jun 10, 2014 4:02 pm

phoneutria wrote:
In all seriousness now, a question:

Satyr wrote:
This also relates to the other tactic of pretending to be more complex than your words.
You cannot be placed into a general type because you are special, or intricate....even if all you can offer are intuitions, emotions, sensations, declarative sentences, quotations...

Have you attempted to place yourself into a general type?


But YOU did, no?

When you called him a SWINE? And that too, on another forum After he was banned...

Quote :

Satyr/Hesperus wrote:
I only want to experience modern garbage vicariously, trying to find in the crap something to salvage...for my own use.


Phoneutria wrote:
A word of caution, dear.
Digging in the mud is an occupation for the swine. Do exercise parcimony when engaging in these vicarious explorations. You may grow a snout.

Oh...it might be too late ...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


Would "coward" and "ressentiment-full" fit The general type for you?

Digging in the mud is also an occupation of the cultivator, wild herbs can be precious.

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Guest
Guest



Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyTue Jun 10, 2014 10:37 pm

Lyssa wrote:
phoneutria wrote:
He'll take a little phrase like "spontaneous" or "just because" ... "  and focus on it, avoiding the context, or how it applies in a general context...within a broader perspective."...


Or so some would like to feign that a broader perspective wasn't taken into account, because one's condescending attitude and over-bearing ego [while speaking of fancy phrases of strength from genuine humility of walking "barefoot on the earth"] saves them from having to deal with who They Are.

Did not realize he is into charity, dear.
Oh, right, he isn't.
The word was taken into account, it was then realized that the criticism was undue.
And yet, even after putting his foot in his mouth over the word spontaneous, he still uses it out of context with the intention to ridicule. Because a sleazy, low picking anklebiter can always count on the audience's lack of memory.

But I remember, dear. Oh yes I do.

Quote :

One will try to challenge an "ignore me", a freezing, while they and they alone get to speak into the air, and then the image of the "unreplied" word left standing means guess what? That's right. Superiority demo.ed.

Superiority is indifference. My invitation is nothing but an opportunity for one to put his mouth where his heart is.

But of course, one can always recruit a lowly doormat to speak on his behalf, and thus retain his status on our little exercise.
You don't mind at all, my dove. Do carry these words in your beak to your dear owner, and don't cry as he sniffs the paper looking for my scent.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyTue Jun 10, 2014 10:39 pm

Lyssa wrote:
phoneutria wrote:
In all seriousness now, a question:

Satyr wrote:
This also relates to the other tactic of pretending to be more complex than your words.
You cannot be placed into a general type because you are special, or intricate....even if all you can offer are intuitions, emotions, sensations, declarative sentences, quotations...

Have you attempted to place yourself into a general type?


But YOU did, no?

When you called him a SWINE? And that too, on another forum After he was banned...

Quote :

Satyr/Hesperus wrote:
I only want to experience modern garbage vicariously, trying to find in the crap something to salvage...for my own use.



Phoneutria wrote:
A word of caution, dear.
Digging in the mud is an occupation for the swine. Do exercise parcimony when engaging in these vicarious explorations. You may grow a snout.

Oh...it might be too late ...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


Would "coward" and "ressentiment-full" fit The general type for you?

Digging in the mud is also an occupation of the cultivator, wild herbs can be precious.

Nothing but a jest, dear. An incurable jester, silly me.
I didn't realize he was banned. The lack of a reply left me so hurt. So, so hurt.
Back to top Go down
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
Lyssa

Gender : Female Posts : 8965
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyWed Jun 11, 2014 5:46 am

phoneutria wrote:
Lyssa wrote:
phoneutria wrote:
In all seriousness now, a question:

Satyr wrote:
This also relates to the other tactic of pretending to be more complex than your words.
You cannot be placed into a general type because you are special, or intricate....even if all you can offer are intuitions, emotions, sensations, declarative sentences, quotations...

Have you attempted to place yourself into a general type?


But YOU did, no?

When you called him a SWINE? And that too, on another forum After he was banned...

Quote :

Satyr/Hesperus wrote:
I only want to experience modern garbage vicariously, trying to find in the crap something to salvage...for my own use.



Phoneutria wrote:
A word of caution, dear.
Digging in the mud is an occupation for the swine. Do exercise parcimony when engaging in these vicarious explorations. You may grow a snout.

Oh...it might be too late ...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


Would "coward" and "ressentiment-full" fit The general type for you?

Digging in the mud is also an occupation of the cultivator, wild herbs can be precious.

Nothing but a jest, dear. An incurable jester, silly me.

Were you just being facetious?

Common retard, dear? Common jester? How self-depreciating.


Quote :
I didn't realize he was banned. The lack of a reply left me so hurt. So, so hurt.

I could fathom your eagerness for a reply with the speed and ressentiment you pounced on a thread just because it was titled 'Satyr' after knowing well he was banned. And even if not, there's enough evidence of the exhibition of your cowardice here when you choose to ignore his replies to the challenge You issued after the tactic of a 'ignore me'. So so brave.

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
Lyssa

Gender : Female Posts : 8965
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyWed Jun 11, 2014 5:49 am

phoneutria wrote:
Lyssa wrote:
phoneutria wrote:
He'll take a little phrase like "spontaneous" or "just because" ... "  and focus on it, avoiding the context, or how it applies in a general context...within a broader perspective."...

Or so some would like to feign that a broader perspective wasn't taken into account, because one's condescending attitude and over-bearing ego [while speaking of fancy phrases of strength from genuine humility of walking "barefoot on the earth"] saves them from having to deal with who They Are.

Did not realize he is into charity, dear.
Oh, right, he isn't.
The word was taken into account, it was then realized that the criticism was undue.
And yet, even after putting his foot in his mouth


Which some never care to Demonstrate; apparently its just enough to accuse, and then say 'ignore me', never having to prove, engage, and just pretend victory.

Oh right, some are cowards. That's just how they are.

And every mirror showing their face(t)s, can be called sleazy. Convenient.

Quote :
over the word spontaneous, he still uses it out of context with the intention to ridicule. Because a sleazy, low picking anklebiter can always count on the audience's lack of memory.

But I remember, dear. Oh yes I do.

But, of course, Precious. You are the one with the Scruples.

Quote :

Quote :

One will try to challenge an "ignore me", a freezing, while they and they alone get to speak into the air, and then the image of the "unreplied" word left standing means guess what? That's right. Superiority demo.ed.

Superiority is indifference.

Even pedophiles say that to women when they are interested in little children, and morons sold and whored to images will believe their indifference is superiority.

And the ones hot and bothered and giving a f--- about life passionately would be the inferior "SWINE", the 'animal lacking humanity'.

But shite, don't let me take away any of that Objective brilliance you display in the Sexocracy thread on ILP.


Quote :
My invitation is nothing but an opportunity for one to put his mouth where his heart is.

Your invitation is for a man-whore to comply with your vampiric stomach-predation, and anyone with Objectivity on this forum has and can only read you as such.


Quote :
But of course, one can always recruit a lowly doormat

But how delightful when he calls me His doormat.


Quote :
to speak on his behalf, and thus retain his status on our little exercise.

But yet again, ressenti-Mental Cowards can always spit anything anywhere like swine? without ever quoting or proving WHERE Satyr ever asked ANYONE to speak for him??

Did he?? Or were you just being facetious, Again?

Should he feel ashamed when virginal-lotus-servers Want to submit to him freely? Such a sweet delight, that noble one is. Should he feel ashamed at the prospect of having 3 eyes, when you have 6??

But those bitter weary feminists who hate the earth, their body, their feminity, and despise even the animals they claim to revere, will continue to ramble because they love sniffing his brave cojones and can't get enough of it, though they pretend to deny,, they would even go to another forum to chase him so obsessedly, because they are soooooo res-Sentimental...

tsk tsk

Quote :
You don't mind at all, my dove. Do carry these words in your beak to your dear owner, and don't cry as he sniffs the paper looking for my scent.

You mean after the desperate attempts  You pined to get him to talk to you and he ignored you blatantly, till this very moment?
You silly jester, you.

How you expose your dreams and longings...

How you ache for his attention...

Don't worry, he might give it to you when you show you want him enough...

Do you dream of being his bitch too?
I don't mind at all, Precious.

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*


Last edited by Lyssa on Wed Feb 25, 2015 9:55 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Guest
Guest



Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyWed Jun 11, 2014 12:06 pm

Lyssa wrote:

I could fathom your eagerness for a reply with the speed and ressentiment you pounced on a thread just because it was titled 'Satyr' after knowing well he was banned. And even if not, there's enough evidence of the exhibition of your cowardice here when you choose to ignore his replies to the challenge You issued after the tactic of a 'ignore me'. So so brave.

What replies?
I thought he was ignoring me...
Smile

Why do you two bother with such silly, womanly games, anyway?
Ignore, don't ignore... matters nothing to me.
Try and stay sane ok?

Wink
Back to top Go down
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
Lyssa

Gender : Female Posts : 8965
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyWed Jun 11, 2014 12:10 pm

phoneutria wrote:
Lyssa wrote:

I could fathom your eagerness for a reply with the speed and ressentiment you pounced on a thread just because it was titled 'Satyr' after knowing well he was banned. And even if not, there's enough evidence of the exhibition of your cowardice here when you choose to ignore his replies to the challenge You issued after the tactic of a 'ignore me'. So so brave.

What replies?
I thought he was ignoring me...
Smile

Why do you two bother with such silly, womanly games, anyway?
Ignore, don't ignore... matters nothing to me.
Try and stay sane ok?

Wink
[/quote]



It was all Facetious.

I'm glad you admitted that much, but its not like you had a choice either when so cornered.

Taaa.

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Guest
Guest



Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyWed Jun 11, 2014 1:46 pm

Leasy wrote:
Which some never care to Demonstrate; apparently its just enough to accuse, and then say 'ignore me', never having to prove, engage, and just pretend victory.

Oh right, some are cowards. That's just how they are.

And every mirror showing their face(t)s, can be called sleazy. Convenient.

Do you see me pretending victory? Really? I am so humble.. Wink

But allow me do DEMONSTRATE, by a brief retelling of facts, all of which can be savored again in these threads referenced below.

1. I made a statement that aesthetic pursuit is spontaneous.
2. Satyr shat a brick over the word spontaneous ( "It's spontaneous, magical....it has no explanation.
Like spontaneous combustion. It just happens. Out of nothingness. )
3. I told him he was arguing against a strawman.
4. I continue to urge him to correct himself (We will have the old man understand the meaning of the word spontaneous by the end of this week. We shall dunk his spongy grey matter in a pool of the stuff.)
5. He picks up a dictionary and realizes that the word spontaneous does not imply anything magical.
6. Now suddenly, it is I who must have thought that the word meant something magical. Otherwise, it would mean he had been fighting his own imagination all along!

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Methods of mediocrity, indeed!

Leasy wrote:
But yet again, ressenti-Mental Cowards can always spit anything anywhere like swine? without ever quoting or proving WHERE Satyr ever asked ANYONE to speak for him??

Did he?? Or were you just being facetious, Again?

Should he feel ashamed when virginal-lotus-servers Want to submit to him freely? Such a sweet delight, that noble one is. Should he feel ashamed at the prospect of having 3 eyes, when you have 6??

Oh he didn't. The pathetic one here is you, not him.

BTW dear, most spiders have 8 eyes, not 6. I may be wrong here, no time to look it up, but only the Loxosceles genus has 6 eyed spiders.
Lil high school level biology for ya Wink

Quote :

But those bitter weary feminists who hate the earth, their body, their feminity, and despise even the animals they claim to revere, will continue to ramble because they love sniffing his brave cojones and can't get enough of it, though they pretend to deny,, they would even go to another forum to chase him so obsessedly, because they are soooooo res-Sentimental...

Dear, don't project on me. I'm not chasing anyone.
I was invited to ILP, and I was invited here.
I made on ILP a single post toward Satyr, all the others have nothing to do with him.
If I get what I want, I am pleased. If I don't, I shrug and move along. Get it?
LOL who am I kidding... you don't get it. All is pain, all is suffering, all is neeeed, es muß sein, the hammer drops, the woman kneels, waaaah Very Happy
I pat you dear, right on your head. Pat pat pat.

Quote :
You mean after the desperate attempts  You pined to get him to talk to you and he ignored you blatantly, till this very moment?
You silly jester, you.

Old man has never ignored me.
I don't think that highly of myself dear. He has never ignored me because he wants eyes on him. He doesn't care whose eyes, he just needs to be looked at, admired, fawned upon. All of that marvel that nobody sees, only him, becomes validated here by the eyes of others.

Quote :

How you expose your dreams and longings...

How you ache for his attention...

Don't worry, he might give it to you when you show you want him enough...

Do you dream of being his bitch too?
I don't mind at all, Precious.


You know so little. Ask him to fill you in, dear. Kneel really deep, he might indulge you Wink
Back to top Go down
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyWed Jun 11, 2014 2:04 pm

Lyssa...allow me to fill you in...

So, I am debating this stupid cunt about aesthetics, and hedonism and so on.
She's disagreeing with me, because stupid cunts end it wherever they feel comfortable, and cunts usually feel comfortable when orgasm is achieved, or given to them.
Because women must be pleasured, and men are easier to please.
Women never consider their own satisfaction their responsibility - it is always someone's problem, but not their own; being that they are the passive element in the sexual game.
When a cunt vibrates in pleasure, vaginally or intestinally, she then wants to discuss feelings...and sharing, and receiving.

But that aside....

Then I try to discover what the root of this conflict is, because I really do not understand what this cunt is talking about.
She stops at pleasure, declaring it as the END...like an animal thinks humping is the only thing it wants, having no clue as to what it is doing and why.
I make the mistake of asking her a question to see what her positions are.
The cunt responds with a terse "spontaneous"...and very little more.
I become confused, since this is part of my positioning....and where I go beyond it.
For me saying it is all innate, for example, is simply stating a starting position from where one advances towards explaining what this "innate" means.  

I ask myself....
"Is this cunt agreeing with me? But then why all this charade?"

I then make the mistake of assuming that this cunt is implying some spontaneous, out of nowhere nothing, shit, I have come across before.
My mistake was I gave the cunt more credit that was her due.
I confess I was hoping this was her position because there was nowhere to go from spontaneous...she having replaced one thought-ending word with another.
Because the cunt had nothing beyond the spontaneous....not even a Christian magical, mystical, out of nothing.
Nada.
Spontaneous was her replacement ending, after the pleasure for its own sake, was exposing her as shallow, and another dumb hedonist.
She just wanted to end it there...because she was clueless.

I smelled a bit of blood in the water, I must confess...but now I know it was her menstrual cycle.

The thing is, Lyssa, the cunt is no more than a simple cunt....besides the coyness and word games.  
I wrongly assumed there was more to the "spontaneous" crack...but there isn't.
She only sees as far as her nipples...I mean her nose.

It's like the "just because"....it is an ending....which can then mean anything, and nothing.
I opted for the "nothing", and she went for the "anything"...as part of her routine.
See, already I've wasted more time on a cunt, than I should have.
But you know how it is when I am locked out of a barn where there are plenty of cunts, like her.  

Will not make that mistake again.
I should have known better after the cunt 's first appearance and her declaration that she always gets attention, and that shit about being "hungry".
Remember her games?
Nothing more to her.
She's a cunt, what more can there be?

A dumb cunt, starving for male attention...now warming up to a man-child she admitted she considered her inferior, but will she tell?
Nope.

If I only wanted attention, would making others despise me be the way to get it?

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Guest
Guest



Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyWed Jun 11, 2014 2:41 pm

I am tired of your idiocy and your false, dishonest caricatures.

Take this text, print it, and glue it to your wall:

Consider a state in which an excess of energy exists.
The energy will be spent whether the individual uses it in an activity or sits still, as it is a dynamic state that dissipates.
Whether the individual sits still, watches a sitcom, or does some wood carving is the effect of the presence (or absence) of a motivation.

Motivation can come in two ways: intrinsic and external.
If he uses this time to study art because he will have an exam, he is under an external motivation.
If he uses this time to study art even though he has no exam, but because it pleases him to do so, he is under an intrinsic motivation.

Intrinsic motivation is an impulse to pursue an activity that is in itself enjoyable and that arises from within, and is a part of the person's organic construct. It may incline a certain way or another depending on the sensibility of a sense or another.

The distinction I have been making for months is that only the activities that fit into this category are aesthetic. And what I have meant by spontaneous and free is nothing but this: an activity that is pursued as a product of an intrinsic motivation
In fact, I may have used these same words before. I can look it up for you dear.

I have described spontaneity very clearly before, and I've done it again. So now, please stop injecting FAKE meanings into MY words. Have some respect for yourself and conduct yourself with dignity.

Grant that you misunderstood me because you acted in prejudice for the word spontaneous, and as far as I am concerned no fowls were done.
Either that, or continue to scramble to have the last word, put an extra insult here and a smear there. It will have no effect on me, as each time you act like scum, I see you more as scum. And scum matters nothing to me.
Back to top Go down
Æon
Wyrm
Æon

Gender : Male Posts : 3581
Join date : 2014-03-25
Location : Outside

Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity EmptyWed Jun 11, 2014 2:44 pm

You know you have reached the mental limits of the manimals and sheeple when they explicate what they mean with "just because", "it just is", or "pleasure is the end".

You are now conscious of and beyond their common, average, modern limits. And most of these sheeple cannot, physically, mentally, expand their limits further. Even if they could, most are too cowardly to push outward into new territory, explore the void, whatnot.

These "spontaneous" comments of theirs indicate their intelligence, essence, quality, for what it is. At this point, it's too easy to push or bully them around, if you want to. They are slaves ready for usage. To be used. Many even make a point of pride about this. They want to be used, by a "higher power", or simply a more intelligent being than themselves.

It's about intellectual ability, potential, degree, and quality.


It's not a coincidence.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




Methods of Mediocrity Empty
PostSubject: Re: Methods of Mediocrity Methods of Mediocrity Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Methods of Mediocrity
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 3Go to page : 1, 2, 3  Next
 Similar topics
-
» Desperate Degenerates
» Resentment towards superior from mediocrity
» culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy.

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: