Know Thyself Nothing in Excess |
| | |
Author | Message |
---|
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Wed Oct 10, 2018 9:20 am | |
| Words in the mouth of an individual dominated by the feminine, identifying with female, no matter what he/she calls himself or believes, are passive. This is why it can play the 'victim', and can claim ignorance as its innocence. Hiding is a passive strategy. One hides and waits, fearing he may be found. He goes from one hiding place to another. Symbols, language, are hiding places for the spirit.
Words in the mouth of an individual dominated by the masculine, identifying with male, no matter what he/she calls himself or believes, are proactive. They reveal what the feminine conceals.....they approach the apparent, their words used to engage not to flee. They expose, recall,. remember. Then they face the consequences without denying their role in the outcome.
The feminine is sly, coy, indirect, insinuating, implying.....using words to say what it wants to reveal in a way that can be denied, if the outcome is unpleasant. The masculine is direct, obvious, even its metaphors leave little to the imagination....they cannot be misinterpreted.
The feminine prefers the shadows, the twilight, low-light environments, where her imperfections can be hidden, and her perfections accentuated. The male is light, is the illuminating brilliance of awareness. It wants to expose the hidden crevices, dispel the shadows, see completely and totally.
Male/Female is the interplay of light and darkness. Male admires in female what he acknowledges, accepts and appreciates in his own feminine side; the female admires in man what she acknowledges, accepts and appreciates of the masculine in herself. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Wed Oct 10, 2018 9:48 am | |
| This Nebulous [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] is a feminized war, using feminine methods, strategies and applications of symbols/language. Female competition is pretentious, attacking the others reputation, her social standing, her reproductive potentials, critiquing appearances, cultivating image, spreading gossip, bad-mouthing the adversary while, often, showing no outward hostility directly. This is how the virus spreads, through the weakest point in the psyche. It takes root in vulnerability, in existential anxiety, and then seeks relief in other....the intimate other: either to unload upon the other all the 'negative', blaming him/her for everything negative, or to identify with other, to lose self in otherness, to escape self in and through other. Masculine methods, tactics, use of language are currently illegal, highly restricted, prohibited, so the only option is to fight against this virus/parasite combination using its own methods, tactics and to expose its use of language, disarming it of its only weapon: language/symbols. We must differentiate virus from parasite....because they are not one and the same....but merge into one in/through the parasite - symbiosis. Along with the virus the parasite is also exposed - the parasite that has merged with the virus into a symbiont, so as to exploit and manipulate esoterically, from the 'inside'....psychologically - by warping the individuals' relationship with reality. This is its survival strategy: using a proxy, because it has never been able to survive directly off the land.It has always needed a mediating entity to protect it, and through it to propagate and to control - zombification. Other parasitical memes/genes symbionts, such as Gypsies, have adopted less sophisticated versions of this method. By studying them, the less sophisticated, we can learn about the parasitical methodology of the more sophisticated. What are the basic components of Gypsy survival strategies? -They never assimilate into the host they parasitically exploit -They are not of the host's genetic group, but may pretend to be. -They exploit weakness, using occult, obscurantism, to manipulate existential anxieties. -They beg, and grovel, playing the victim when they are practising predation, or rather they are scavengers. -They remain on the periphery of the group/host, they are scavenging upon. -They feel no shame in thieving or exploiting the host. they have in-goup moral codes that do not apply to out-groups. -They lie, constantly and cannot be trusted. Their 'loyalties' are necessitated by their circumstances and when these change their 'loyalty' their discipline to the host's rule, to whatever degree it is practices, evaporates. Hating the parasite will not help you become immune to it. You can't hate a vulture for using a specific survival strategy; you can't hate a virus for infecting you; you can't hate a tick for annoying you, or a mosquito for feeding on you. To become immune you must practice hygiene, exercise, good nutrition...and by increasing your understanding you can, perhaps, construct counter-tactics. emotion is of no use here, except as a motivator and multiplier. To deal with mosquitoes you must study them....know what and how, and when and where.....and then you can begin to react, rationally. The goal is not to obliterate the species form the face of the earth, but to become immune to it. A thicker skin, like elephants evolved, or more creative methods. A parasite cannot help but be what its past ( nature/genes) made it, and what genetic potentials its culture ( nurture/meme) cultivated. Hating the virus will do no good.....it fails to understand what weakness in you it finds and exploits. Hating the parasite only makes you vulnerable to it, because emotion is the weakness it finds and exploits. The feminine is its preferred spirit. Chaos is where it thrives, exploiting confusion, turmoil, to insert itself and to remain undetected. Shadows, darkness, is where it hides, despising light, all that reveals, exposes, preferring to conceal, to play with shadows, with vagueness, and construct an effect, a psychology it can manipulate. You can't eliminate the virus because, as I noted, it exploits the natural weakens self-consciousness produces in you; you can't exterminate the parasite because even if you manage to eliminate every last one of it, another will take its place, because this survival strategy is too successful to be left unexploited by some group that feels vulnerable and feeble, and has no other options. The parasite has exploited this existential weakness to sell all kinds of naive, utopian ideals, while at the same time embracing its victim status and its suffering, as inevitable. Practising Hellenic asceticism is the only solution. Making yourself fit, able to deal with both virus and parasite. Making yourself immune to their effects, and their methods. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Wed Oct 10, 2018 3:18 pm | |
| This Nebulous, War of Words, the First Word War...Word War I, Feminine War...is a war against European males. European females, for the most part, are the reward and can easily assimilate into any new hierarchy they are forced into. They also hope to assimilate European genes into their Abrahamic, multi-cultural Utopias, because the clever ones know race is real, and the prospect of an easily exploitable, naive, gullible population of slaves, also means a reduction in creativity, and a reduction of average IQ's necessary to keep the machinery going. What masculinity is, as a thinking outside the box, against the status quo, is what produced innovation, philosophy, great art....and they are afraid of a world they can control populated by imbeciles, and passive-aggressive dullards. Everything has a cost.
Eliminating white males will eliminate genetic treasure, accumulated over thousands of years. One no other peoples have ever managed to equal. Those that simple pretend to be European, when their spirit belongs to another heritage, or have mixed into the European genes but have remained tied to their mother race, will find allies among emasculated Europeans who have adopted the r/ strategy because they cannot compete with their own kind, so they would rather dilute it or eliminate it, to improve their odds.
Kananaugh's case is one that exposes the viciousness of these infected zombies, controlled by a manipulative parasite. If he had been Jewish, or a woman, or black, or even Asian it would not have been so personal. It was his European identity and the fact that he was a devout Christian, that made them afraid. The only acceptable fall-back position is Christianity...preferably Puritan Protestantism. Catholicism is too close to the Roman legacy, as is Byzantium and the Orthodox branch. This comes too close to the real threat. Putin adopts Orthodoxy as his replacement for Marxist dogma.....because the average imbecile needs an absolutist nihilism to give itself to. It cannot tolerate itself and its own existence without this crutch. The parasite has weaponized this crutch. Any awakening is a threat...a return to a world pre-Abrahamism is intolerably terrifying to the infected. They would be forced to give-up their victim identity. Then what would be left for them to find pride in? The parasite would be disarmed...its viral meme would be useless. Without the virus what would be left of the symbiont, but what it originally was? _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Wed Oct 10, 2018 5:03 pm | |
| Little crumbs I drop, here and there, as if randomly. Little drops of deliciousness, triggering cascading mental storms, like a butterfly fluttering away, in seeming distress. Little symbols that I shape and bake, consistently, serving them on silver plattered wear, with tender care. Little morsels to be consumed, and in the brain's oven burned, triggering reactive chute d'eau, wet and hot, like a virgin's bath.
Little words left, here and there, seemingly with random recklessness, each one in a repeating sequence, enhancing, driving the passion upward, bursting forth, and downward, leaving itself bear. Little words generously given, for hungry souls, afraid of eating....and I find their secret consuming in their faecal matter, presuming....fermenting, stressing towards sweetness, inebriating nectar... before the vinegar takes hold. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Wed Oct 10, 2018 6:00 pm | |
| Those who cannot fend for themselves, cultivate an insidious duplicity, feeding-off those that can. Those who cannot climb, jump on the backs of those that can. Those that cannot think nobly, take advantage of the nobility of others. Those who cannot accept the truth, nor cope with it, nor see it, turn the truth into a lie, and then taunt those that can. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Thu Oct 11, 2018 11:16 am | |
| _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
| Subject: Re: Words Sat Oct 20, 2018 10:28 pm | |
| The tyrannical nature of the term 'anti-' something is that it accuses the other of myopic oppositionalism, while excusing oneself of the same obsessive nature that'd be associated with being 'pro-' something. It's in the interests of every parasite to create an extremist false dichotomy out of every issue so they can feed on the spoils of the conflict.
Hidden behind every accusation of 'anti-' something, is, if there is no moderated term for an alternative of expression, i.e. 'counter-' (in 'counter-Semitic') recognized by the same accuser, then they are truly hiding, or encouraging the normalization of, their obsessive 'pro-' behavior which expresses itself as a callous disregard or hatred for all but the associated subject. |
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Sun Oct 21, 2018 4:36 pm | |
| What's in a 'name'...but magic? Powerfully unknown sparking the imagination to use them to find healing, to fulfil its ambitions, to express and seek gratifications for its private and pubic needs/desires. A mystical art that unintentionally and sometimes intentionally reveals the mind's inner workings, and absorbs into the occult workings of psyche an unceasing influx of data establishing a secret love/hate relationship. What's in a word, but the seed that fertilizes what is not in your power to control, but can only hope to direct?
Segments revealing patterned sequences of inner processes, mostly misunderstood by the mind, imagined to have powers similar to what the individual experienced when revelation exposed it to what was intimate and still alien to him.
A transmitter, the nervous system, converting information to neurological code.....sending out, after it has processed what has come in. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Mon Oct 22, 2018 10:05 am | |
| How does a degenerate use words, within his ideology founded on exploiting the absence of absolutes, or manipulating the concept of 'nil' which distinguishes the nihilist? For degenerates the word is .... (1) a magical talisman that can declare any absurdity, subsequently validating it using obscurantism, or arguing that the presence of the word itself, the symbol, is evidence enough to constitute, the absurdity it refers to, a respectable possibility. This is the conversion the absence of the absence ( omniscience/omnipotence), the negative, into a hypothetical 'positive'. This is where 'nihilism' fabricates 'positive' theories out of nothingness, justifying them emotionally, egotistically....manipulating mankind's weaknesses, existential anxieties, insecurities, desire to evade culpability, to escape a limiting past. and.... (2) a method of cynically dismissing any theory that threatens the first. the absence acting as a reason to dismiss, since there can never be absolute certainty. There is no omniscience/omnipotence, therefore all words are meaningless, allowing the original criterion of emotion to fill in the void. Another thing to consider when thinking of the nature of words, is the idea expressed in the quote... The mightiest warrior cannot defend himself from the intrusive power of symbols.....breaking bones,a s not only sticks and stones can do. Breaking psychology, shattering the will....coercing or seducing its weaknesses. In human mating the male often uses words to seduce the female with flattery....hyperbolic lies, essentially.....inflating self, placing her on a pedestal, telling her what she wants to believe. The female also uses symbols to accentuate and lie about her 'true' attributes. Rules of thumb:1]When you hear too much praise, too many flattering remarks, the use of too much prose and poetics....there is a lie being propagated. In the area of philosophy, the mind that cannot, or refuses to speak plainly and directly, or cannot describe his own beliefs, hos own convictions in a manner that even an average mind can grasp, is either ignorant of his own beliefs, because he adopted them based no their egotistical or emotional appeal,or he is hiding a motive that contradict the words being used, attempting to use obfuscation to seduce or threaten, in an attempt to evade detection. 2]In the case of a dissonance between words spoken, symbols used, and actions performed, choices made, one must always resolve the conflict by siding with actions/choices, at the expense of words/symbols. The words/symbols may be intentionally used to contradict and/or mask actions/choices. Too much obscurity, too many metaphors, flowery allegories, are usually signs of an attempt to alter actions/choices in a have fo semiotics, triggering emotions, manipulating ego. Words do not possess an innate power, outside the ability to manipulate and exploit those who lack the talent, or the mind, to be immune to their effects....but words , if used properly, can expose the mind to a world where he may find an advantage over others. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Thu Oct 25, 2018 11:09 am | |
| There are two approaches to the use of language. One is descriptive, attempting to remain as precise and clear as possible, so as to construct a noetic map which can be used to successfully navigate reality. The other inverts the motive, and begins with an interpretation that entails a suggestion which resolves a navigation issue. The latter wants to change the world in a way that a solution is revealed through the interpretation of it; the former only wants to report, describe the world as it is, and then leaves the solution to ‘problems’ arising from the interpretation as something to be resolved later, and depending on what the motive of each individual is. The map is presented and depending on the ideal, the objective, of each individual and his/her specific traits, the course of action is to be determined.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Thu Oct 25, 2018 6:01 pm | |
| Languages evolve to reflect the development of human awareness. From cave drawings, where image represents an entire phenomenon, more complex forms arise such as linear-a, and linear-b, script where each image represented entire concepts, abstractions and/or syllables, and from there alphabets evolve where each symbol corresponds to a sound, and a sequence represents what a single image represented in the past, and then mathematics evolves where each symbol is entirely abstract, and represents an idea with no external reference so it can be used to represent any external reference. A process that mirrors the evolution of human thinking from word of mouth narratives, to insinuating mythologies, and then to more precise philosophies. The gradual ascent in complexity is accompanied by the gradual ascent from broad, ambiguity, leaving much to the imagination, to more precise symbols representing more precise concepts that leaves less to the imagination but expose the mind to a level of complexity where it becomes aware of how much is unknown. Like ascending up a mountain. At the base all is intimate, but close-by, restricting your view. You hear sounds, see shadows, but you cannot discern accurately what lies a few meters away. The imagination goes wild, with anticipation, fear siding with caution, imagining the worse, the extreme negative, and then needing the opposite, the extreme positive to deal with it. As you ascend up the mountain you begin to see more, and further. What sounded mysterious is now exposed, but what you gain in view you lose in details. You see more, and further away in space, but you see less precisely, but more generally. From the intuitive to the intellectual, corresponds to alchemy giving way to chemistry, minerology etc., and astrology to astronomy, psychology, biology etc., and mythology to philosophy, spirituality etc. The simple produces multiple spin-offs dealing with specific categories within the general. But with each advancement upwards more parameters emerge, more possibilities, more categories. This is exactly what language reflects. This gradual advancement requiring more precision. Hieroglyphics become symbols of syllables or entire words, and then symbols/letters representing sounds. With each step up many superstitions are left behind. The imagination no longer has to speculate when the mind can discern. The ancient Greeks believed in Olympians gods, representing environmental phenomena. When man understood what caused them then the same deities became representations of natural forces, such as electromagnetism. Knowledge and understanding increases the illuminated regions of reality, and superstition, and tis obscurantism, is forced to the edges, where light merges with darkness and produces shadows it can exploit to manipulate human fears. The more man sees and understands, the less he is mystified and manipulated by fear and hope. Then a new frontier of mystification is produced with new superstitions, and fears to be exploited by charlatans and priests. Language evolves to accommodate this advancement of human awareness and the emergence of new mysterious frontiers. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Mon Oct 29, 2018 1:26 pm | |
| These are the trigger words they use when you become a threat, or they cannot offer a reply that will not expose them and their real motives: Bigot, racist, sexist, homophobe, fascist and NAZI!!! Their deepest, most intimate anxieties exposed in the choice of defensive labels, referring to post-modern brainwashing imagery.
When they cannot challenge you with their minds, not their bodies, they revert to emotional, feminine, methods.
Hypocrites, cowards, liars pretentious imbeciles...all they have are words, but not to confront and challenge reasonable, but to manipulate emotions, feelings. women burst into tears when they cannot cope....degenerates throw words against the threat. if it succeeds they believe it was because of their 'superior' mind, when they used words to accuse, to emote, to manipulate.... Emasculated, feminized, degenerates, using the same methods...using words in the same way. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Mon Oct 29, 2018 1:36 pm | |
| Whenever you hear someone resort to the accusation of 'NAZI'!!!, you know you re in the presence of an imbecile, a lair, a coward, and a pretentious charlatan. Nothing he has said, is saying, or will ever say, will matter. A clown...a joke. Treat him/her as such. Nazi is the word that lets you know you are in the presence of a Jew. It's their 'go to' word. The defence of second to last resort. The 'last' resort shall remain unspecified....so as to not prevent it from expressing itself. I'll be posted [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]...for the sake of enjoyment. It's happened many times and only when the female or the Abrahamic has reached his wits end, and can think of no other defence without compromising itself and the ideology it cannot abandon unless it places integrity above survival. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Tue Oct 30, 2018 10:16 pm | |
| A tribe's relationship with the soil, the earth, is what shapes their language and their culture. Attachment to the earth, expressed in the worship of representations of it, in rituals, in one's gratitude and respect for it, is also expressed in how symbols/words refer to the tangible, the experienced, the physical, first, and then take off into flights of imagination, and allegories. Genes to Memes.
But another survivals strategy also evolved, later. Unable and unwilling, to attach itself to the earth, it wanders upon its surface, never settling, never starting a relationship....and never developing a culture, or a language that refers to the tangible, the experienced, but from meme to gene, it expresses an esoteric reaction to an exoteric world it fears and feels insecure within. It needs a proxy...a stand-in....a go-between, and its language is shaped by this need. Not connecting to earth, the soil, but to minds, feelings, sensation....to exploit and manipulate. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
| Subject: Re: Words Fri Nov 02, 2018 8:14 am | |
| - Quote :
- if it succeeds they believe it was because of their 'superior' mind, when they used words to accuse, to emote, to manipulate
[size=32]The stampeding cow believes itself cleverer than the cow lost from the pack when it is hurtling towards a cliff. So also, humans believe themselves clever as they deny their senses for conformity to an authority figure - no matter how retarded or subversive it is.[/size] |
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Thu Nov 08, 2018 8:31 pm | |
| Like any discipline applying art, philosophy does not begin with the motive to solve a 'problem', but to frame an environment within which problems can be identified, in relation to an objective, and then to resolve said problems, if and when possible. Even the judgement of a problem's resolution is to be judged beforehand.
In the past application was how all judgements were resolved. Animals, plants, do not need to debate semantics and compare judgements. They act, and environment determines which judgements was more accurate, and which one less so....cost/benefit. The degree to which the judgement was accurate determines the costs, and the benefit is a measure of its correctness, taking into account chance. One can be wrong and still succeed, thinking it was because he judged correctly when it was a product of other circumstances it had no ability to perceive. The simpler organisms simply act....applying judgement. they judge spontaneously, governed by centuries of trial/error stored as memory, called DNA. As conciousness rises then it begins intervening upon these automated judgements, wanting to out-perform the competition, or to deal with those unperceived factors called 'chance'. Chance also referring to randomness....the chaotic aspects of existence. A reactivity we call free-will, as it adjusts the automated genetic programming to the unforeseen, the inconceivable.
In the moment, the present, the mind can adjust the determined past to the ongoing present. This is the Flux of (inter)activity, necessitating the flexibility of a mind that can slightly adjust precedent to subtle random factors, and to the complex. In the moment of choice the future is determined as a product of this slight intervention of Will. But the mind is slow, and processing takes time. So the mind trains to automate reactivity, requiring minimal processing....as in the martial arts. Most often it simply gathers data, learning to identify new patterns to adjust its reactions. It learns. This infinitesimal moment in space/time is the range of freedom the will has. With every adjustment the organism slightly modifies its programming, adding to the DNA memories its own algorithms. if successful they are passed on as automated to the next generation. Nature selects these by gradually weeding away mutations that do not work, allowing those that work to become innate. But man extends genetics with memetics, and he can externalize these adjustments, as techniques/technologies. He writes an addition to his DNA, as semiotic code.
Trial and Error no longer applies within man-made environments, directed by a motive, other than survival of the fittest. Man can shelter wrong judgements from the costs, and accentuate the benefits, guided by an ulterior motive. Farming cattle teaches him how to select according to a objective. He can breed cows with udders so large that they could not survive in the wild, but can produce large quantities of milk, within the protective barn, and he can select humans who are simple, and who doubt their owns senses, or question their own use fo language, to make them docile, or cynical, or confused enough to be more malleable. Like cows born and raised in a barn, such humans cannot function in nature. Born and raised I controlled, protective environments, they occupy themselves with theoretic, about how nature is, or ought to be, and debate existence, and free-will, comfortably questioning the most self-evident things, indulging in word-games, and in mental conundrums, because language has ceased to be a matter of life and death, and has become an exploration, a toy, a a surreal art-piece representing his internal turmoil and confusion, or trying to express ennui and an incomprehensible inner void. When these additions contradict his DNA programming, they are called nihilistic. Trial and error no longer apply as they did in the wild...cost/benefits adjusted to a different standard, wanting to socially select a new kind of human. What can 'freedom' mean to a creature who has only known the safety of sheltering, and who is terrified by the very idea of naturally selected cost/benefits? The simple, unforgiving, brutal economics of nature, have been replaced with new standards. How can he believe in free-will when he's addicted to institutionalization, and deep down inside he worships what he pretends to hate? Like a young boy hates his protective, yet domineering, father, but can't break free from his sheltering? He comforts himself by doubting there is a world outside his father's home, or that there are living beings there. Would not such a boy seek to be disciplined and incarcerated by a institutional authority figure, substituting for a father? Would he not hate and adore this father-figure, pretending he wants to break free, but secretly wanting to remain jailed? With no real father to go through the ritual of coming of age, where a young boy's admiration and idealization of his father eventually becomes resentment, and a realization that his father is not omnipotent, or omniscient...but imperfect, and fallible, like himself. How could a young boy repeat these rites with a faceless institution? He is stuck in admiring or resenting, never able to mature and a approach himself and his won father as a man who knows nobody is perfect, because there is no such thing. The institution cannot be overcome. It punishes and cares not. It only wants to socially engineer the boy to be a productive member of society, abiding by its rules....remaining disciplines and dependent. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Thu Nov 08, 2018 9:19 pm | |
| The desperate degenerate having been convinced, beyond doubt, of the magical powers of words and numbers, gradually becomes aware that symbols only have a psychosomatic effect. He then blames himself, or the particular rituals, applications, for this impotence, seeking better ones, becoming easy prey for any con-artist and every delusional charlatan. Some become disillusioned, and vulnerable, their fears turning to defensive anger, or a cynical expunging of nervous energies, called laughter, they go to the other extreme, and from believing words held secret universal codes, they dismiss them as nonsense, offering nothing but human expressions of anxiety.
Like a child who grows up believing his parents are omnipotent/omniscient, they may seek such parental figures in ideals, or having discovered the fallibility of their parents, they begin feeling insecure and negative towards all forms of authority. Their own infantile misjudgements are projected as accusations, or redirected towards more promising idols.
An lucid and honest assessment of what language is, including mathematics, may help them avoid both bipolar extremes. Semiotics are neurological projections, representing the synthesis of mind/body, relating to an indifferent, and mostly unknown world. The mental maps represented by symbols, are neither magical maps leading to hidden treasures, nor useless scribblings, leading to wild goose chases. Like all maps, abstractions can be externalized as art.....and evaluated against a fluid geography. a map helps the mind orient itself, and direct its will towards a desired destination. Its symbols offer a general combination of markers the individual can use to navigate his way towards his objective. Like maps they are technologies, externalizing an internal mental map. How the markers on the map relate is called 'meaning'. We evaluate the quality of a map by how useful it is in reaching a destination...how long it took us...and if the destination actually exists in the world, and is not only a point on parchment. Like maps we first travel the world, marking down what we see, the distances between them, the difficulty of the spaces between points, their elevations, and we mark forests, lakes, mountains etc. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Sat Nov 10, 2018 7:15 am | |
| Semiotics, using words/numbers are the mind's attempts to know itself, and what made it possible. But it mistakes its own interpretations of the processes for the processes themselves, like an artist who mistakes his painting of himself as the essence of himself. Having perceived itself perceiving, it ascribes mystical powers on the product, hoping it can discover the secret beneath its own existence and awareness of its own awareness of existing. To put it another way: Congruencies of patterns (unities called organisms), translating themselves into and through a different medium, or different patterns, (metaphor, transmission, transportation of meanings = inter-relating patterns), convinces itself that its own translation of its own understanding into a different medium also transports the essence which it cannot understand.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Mon Nov 12, 2018 6:28 pm | |
| Though the absolute is an entirely noetic construct, an ideological abstractions, its effects are no less impressive. Like all theoretical singularities it can absorb space/time, even light, into its theoretical abyss, changing the rules that govern experienced existence. Within the theoretical premises of the singularity, all natural laws can be replaces by any hypothesis. It can be one thing and its opposite, simultaneously, and most impressive of all it can reinterpret reality by imploding it into itself, then expelling it as an alternate more real 'reality'. All this in psychological terms, means that the infected mind is both comforted and empowered by the idea(l). The world is reinterpreted from within the idealism's contexts. Though it cannot be used to predict, it does have a psychological utility. Every experienced event, every observed phenomenon, can be absorbed, after-the-fact, into its theoretical ideology – its spiritual dogma. The incomprehensible becomes comprehended, from within the ideology. Its vagueness, called mysticism and/or 'magic', deals with inconsistencies and self-contradictions. It's a meme not extending from genes, an ideology not based on reality, but the reverse: the physical, tangible, experienced becomes an extension of the dogma. There's a romantic idealism inherent, making it seductive, and comforting to the feminine and the child. An individual feels like he understands what he did not before. The mysterious simply becomes mystical, and stress becomes awe. The unpredictable suddenly becomes something that can be predicted, if you grasp the complexities and do the spiritual work, which usually involves meditation and strong belief – a surrender to the dogma's principles, by repressing doubt and reason. Short-term psychosomatic benefits should be expected, because mind is part of body. Here the 'nil' acts as a support. It is channelled, through the mind, alchemically altering it from a source of anxiety into a mystical source of occult empowerment: Positive' Nihilism. The idea can be anything and everything. All paradoxes and self-contradictions are explained as belonging to its mystical essence. He who remains true to the path will find enlightenment, the point where these contradictions are resolved in a point of absolute enlightenment – usually involving some mystical experience involving chemicals and/or states of mental distress. On the opposite end, the pure and/or authentic Nihilist, also finds the 'nil' empowering. Its psychological expression is usually cynical; an easy readiness to dismiss any and all theories, no matter their quality. No dogma, no theory, can survive its defensive power. No matter how much evidence, and/or reasoning, if it fails to present absolute evidence, or fails to prove itself absolutely, it can be dismissed, and replaced by an inferior theory with the advantage of being 'positive', offering emotional, spiritual, well-being... or a method giving the believer a life purpose, and his existence meaning, above and beyond the mundane.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Mon Nov 12, 2018 7:12 pm | |
| Actually it's a defining aspect of nihilism, whether you call it religious dogma, or political ideology = spiritual and/or secular Nihilism. Philosophy builds theory on observation, whereas the Nihilist builds the idea first, then establishes a method with which to deal with the experienced real, or to selectively absorb it into ideological contexts.
It always proposes a 'whole' even if it may not call it a 'one', or a singularity. It offers a comforting certainty within an uncertain fluctuating existence. Like the concept of a universe... the mind projects itself 'outside' existence to convert the multiplicity into a singular whole: the ideology contradicting the experienced real. The contradiction is the product of mental dissonance, trying to harmonize the idea(l) with the real: noumenon and phenomenon.
Christianity also has the contradiction of a one-god, with three-manifestations, corresponding to mind/nervous system/body, or reason/will/passions. The contradiction is sublimated through the mystical inversion power of the nervous system, synthesizing body/mind converting it to mind/body. Instead of the idea(l), the noumenon, being the product of existence, the interpretor of the phenomenon, the phenomenon is the interpretor of the noumenon, or phenomenon phenomenon phenomenon, the world, is the product of the noumenon, the mind. This is the empowering part, that seduces the ones lacking power, promising strength to the feeble with a change of attitude, and deep conviction.
Christianity still remains polytheistic, within the contexts of a one-whole. Its saints representing the gods and spirits they 'overcame', and the ancient pagan heroes represented by pious men of legend, and miracle workers.
Nihilism cannot but lie, and self-deceive, deceiving others to become more believable to itself. Without a following it is impotent, because its only source of 'power' is through others. It is impotent in an indifferent world, full of organisms that do not understand symbols or a particular language. It can only survive within the ones who have been trained, primed....readied to be influenced by signs with no meaning other than mystical nonsense. The only possible power it can attain is through proxies. It needs to proselytize, and to convince others, because it is useless outside its effect on minds....its psychosomatic potentials.
What effect does money, or gold, or silver, or diamonds have on animals that have not been edumucated, trained, to associate both with specific possibilities - pain/pleasure? I guess you can train the animal using Pavlovian techniques, but this only proves my point. This is indoctrination: training the mind to associate specific symbols, words, with specific rewards and punishments, or images that produce stress, anxiety, or comfort. Elements may have a pragmatic use, but they've been given additional meanings that are entirely psychological. Genes to Memes can be rewritten as Real to Idea(l) ...phenomenon to noumenon. It's all part of human husbandry - propaganda, marketing. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Tue Nov 13, 2018 12:00 pm | |
| - Schiller, Friedrich wrote:
- Though need may drive Man into society, and Reason implant social principles in him, Beauty alone can confer on him a social character. Taste alone brings harmony into society, because it establishes harmony in the individual. All other forms of perception divide a man, because they are exclusively based on either on the sensuous or on the intellectual part of his being; only the perception of the Beautiful makes something whole in him, because both his natures must accord with it.
Twenty-Seventh Letter - On the Aesthetic Education of Man Man's 'two natures' being ideal/real, the mind/body. Beauty, properly understood, is symmetry (order), adjusted to the absence of absolutes, necessitating functionality, displayed as proportionality. Symmetry + Proportionality, the synthesis of order and functionality, is appreciated as 'potential'. this is also what we call genetics = inherited potentials. This is also what we call nature, past manifesting as possibilities, as presence. Nature/Nurture. Physical potential is called beauty. Mental potential is called intelligence. It is the recognition of probability or increased possibilities = potentials. Man evaluates and appreciates probabilities ( order, patterns) within a field of time/space, of possibilities ( space - dimensions). Another word for proportionality is dimensions. Modern intentionally or die to cowardice and/or stupidity, 'beauty with how the object of their need/desire makes them feel. They cannot extricate themselves form their won subjectivity, to perceive objectively. If an ugly beast makes them feel good they call it 'beautiful' and 'good'....just as the ones who make him feel afraid, are accused of phobias, and those that make it hate himself, are accused of hate. The modern is always projecting his feelings upon the strange other - unloading themselves into the unknown other. He cannot empathize without surrendering to sympathy or antipathy. He is always overwhelmed by himself, and his emotions; engulfed by his subjectivity, his ego, his pathos. Narcissist or Cynic. The Modern cleanses himself, purifies himself, to become an idealized conception of himself. The other is always a caricature of what he despises about himself or feels insecure about or fears in himself. The 'Nil' is his tool, to fabricate oneness or to dismiss all that threatens his idealized self. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Wed Nov 14, 2018 9:30 pm | |
| From Narcissist, the extreme of 'positive' Nihilism, to Cynic, the extreme of pure Nihilist, the 'internal', self-consistent 'logic' goes like this: 1- If it is spoken, it expresses an opinion, using words (logos), then it flawed, and because it is flawed it cannot be absolute, (true), therefore it is untrue, absolutely so. If it is not 'one', complete whole, it must be 'nil', incomplete, fragmented. Then the 'leap of faith' occurs: if it is flawed, like every other spoken, expressed, opinion, it is equally wrong as any other - parity in nil. Unless the absolute 'one' the absolute truth can be proven, absolutely, then all perspectives are equally wrong. All is subjective. And since all is subjective, subjective denial suffices...so if one individual refuses to accept an opinion it can never be 'true'. Resistance to any perspective that 'hurts' must convince everyone, and if one person denies it, it cannot be true, because it cannot absolutely prove itself to absolutely everyone. Power of the 'nil'.
2- Man is 'divine', he is a representation the one- absolute God, therefore all that can uttered words, are speaking in god's voice, expressing a version of god. This self-flattery cannot be disprove, even if one were to have the audacity to try - you can't prove a negative. Since nobody knows the absolute, he cannot speak for god completely. He can only speak a piece of the Divine. Logos is divine, and words are magical/mystical....they are the one'god's mind in code, as symbols, metaphors. The word IS God, so Logos is the voice of god - uni-verse speaking of itself, about itself, to itself. Logos is the path into god's mind. Any unifying word, like 'love' is approaching the absolutely divine. What is divisive is Satanic evilness, trying to trick man away form the divine. God is absolute so all words are fragments of the absolute channelled through representation of the absolute. Since nobody can ever know the mind of god, entirely, but only fragmented, in pieces, nobody can ever disprove any hypothesis, so it remains plausible in a small way. The Criterion changes. If all humans are parts of god, divine in themselves, then feelings are intuitions of the 'truth'. If each individual is a representation of the one-god, the absolute, then not only his/her words, but his/her feelings, intuitions, sensations, are expressions of the 'good' the divine. Placing yourself in a state of openness, by suppressing the minds 'static', is a way to allow the divine to flow through you. A talented messiah will speak words of unity and 'goodness', empowerment.....the feelings his words produce in others will be evidence of their sacred source. His popularity will be evidence that all the pieces of the Divine are harmonizing - oneness is approached when god awakens to himself. The 'nil' is merely an admittance that a 'one' must exist. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
| Subject: Re: Words Mon Nov 19, 2018 8:22 pm | |
| intimitation to intimidate by feigning closeness, intimacy, and desiring another's incapacitation or loss by the other humoring or rejecting it
ex. "Jesse intimitated Bob by libeling him as, or suggesting that he is, monstrous when Bob rejected Jesse's request to live with him. Jesse has a history of thieving from Bob." |
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Wed Nov 28, 2018 11:23 am | |
| Just as you can increase the probability of a particular response by the way you form a question, you can adjust the odds of a particular desired answer by the way you define a word. It's not only how a question is asked, but that it is asked, the exposes the motive of the questioner. If the questioner is not really interested in finding a most probable answer, he will define the words, in accordance to dictionary conventions, but with no reference to reality, so that the answer will be negative, or it will be sought 'outside' reality. It depends on the motive, and if it is on the 'positive' or negative side of the bipolar nihilistic spectrum.
A pure nihilist, a coward, not wanting any plausible answer, will frame the definition in a way that it cannot be validated by anything empirical, making it entirely idealogical, and so easily dismissed as a human construct. A 'positive' nihilist, a hypocrite, will frame it in the same way so as to justify its validation in an unrealistic realm, outside space/time, justifying his preferred ideology which he posits as a more 'real' reality, or a deeper understanding of reality which is contradicted by experience and empiricism.
What do these two methods have in common, other than being nihilistic, meaning they are contradicted by experience and empiricism, and other than that they both lack intellectual integrity? They both define the words, referring to concepts, in a manner that keeps the concepts noetic, abstract, ideological. The definition alludes to a desired answer, and nothing other than that answer will be accepted. So, such self-deceiving spirits will define the words in absolute terms, demanding absolute answers, even though nothing absolute has ever been experienced, and the concept remains noetic - entirely in the mind.
We more realistic pagans, despite the laymen who had to be fed allegorical simplifications, begin with the empirical, and the experienced using it as a foundation. The dictionary keeps us disciplined to conventions that are necessary for communication, and the world keeps us disciplined to reality we wish to engage, not hide from, nor cover-up. We make of ourselves a noetic conduit, not to entrap meaning in theoretical gibberish, but to connect conventions - the past - with the world - the present - daring to then project them as probabilities into the future. Those who fake interest in reality, but only want to hide from it, or those who want to waste their lives in hedonistic distractions, will find many ways to avoid even what is self-evident.
The 'from the ground-up' attitude begins with experience/empiricism, not from a projected desirable concept presented as 'one' or 'nil': dualistic bipolar absolute ends. These absolutist methods are reactions to existence...psychological coping methods. They are impotent and nonsensical, only providing the utility of self-comforting; they are counter-intuitive because intuition exposes them to what is undesirable: either, 'too much,' or 'not enough'.
'Language' is the pool in which many a trembling spirit seek baptismal salvation. Whether the word be 'god' or 'morality,' or 'self,' or 'love,', or 'one,' is of little importance. What matters is that absolution is achieved and innocence is returned to - or should I say forgetfulness? Lethe. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Wed Nov 28, 2018 5:54 pm | |
| No need for any anthropomorphic terms, alluding to a previous superstition. The ordered part of the Cosmos is comprehensible using the attraction/repulsive force, alluding to harmony/disharmony. Being organisms ourselves, order is intuitive. We feel these forces in us, and they are part of the way we think, using the binary on/off mechanism, producing dualities. Simple enough to evolve and effective enough to survive, until now. What is counter-intuitive is chaos, defined as randomness. The concept is so incomprehensible that we must assume it is a different kind of order, or attempt to comprehend it in relation to order. We are addicted to order; so dependent on it that we must see it everywhere. But the near-absolute point (Big Bang) which we wrongly call the 'beginning', alludes to its opposite, a near-absolute point of disorder, or randomness, producing the cycle of time. Yin/Yang The near-absolute point of order can be thought of as a cosmic choke-point; a near-absolute singularity (duality) where near-absolute randomness (infinity) inverts back towards near-absolute order, starting the process again. Cycles of Time We can also assume that expanding space/time, meaning expanding possibilities, if we use Heidegger's definition of 'space', alludes to an expansion of possibilities crating uniformity, as probabilities, within this field, converge towards a median 'vibration' = uniformity of energy. Absolute chaos means infinite space/time. So another explanation for the cycle to restart is if in this expanding field of possibilities, all possibilities increasingly become equally possible, and within this field a new near-absolute singularity implodes out of this field, into a new expanding field. Harmony/Disharmony are sufficient concepts to explain attraction/repulsion variables of possibility/probability. Therefore, the relationship is antagonistic. The Greeks called it agon. I've called it need/suffering. No need for anthropomorphic imagery, implying some underlying conciousness or motive. The attempt to rescue Abrahamism from itself can only be successful among those it has always managed to seduce: the desperate degenerates in every age, and in every tribe. The desperation crosses tribal lines. There are degenerates in all bloodlines, increasing yearly when sheltering permits unfit genes to propagate. The human brain can only conceptualize order. It must reduce the incomprehensible to the comprehensible...and anthropomorphizing is a simplistic version of this. Science offers metaphors for an advancement in the methodology from imagery to abstraction. Primitive minds need primitive means, so everything is simplified/generalized into imagery the average mind can identify with and recognize as order; more sophisticated minds can identify and recognize order as pure abstraction, as symbol, alluding to order as an idea. The movement from the simple to the sophisticated is a movement from body, the physical, to mind, the idea. This process is fraught with dangers, because the mind can lose contact with itself and its own roots, taken away by its own thoughts. Order, being predictable, and consistent, implies a movement/momentum towards probability - its absolute ideal being the singularity = one. All probabilities encompassed, imploding, into an absolute certainty. Randomness, being an increase in unpredictability, implies a moment towards increasing possibilities - its absolute ideal being uniform chaos, or absolute randomness = nil. All possibilities exploding into absolute uncertainty. The momentum from one towards the other is experienced by us ordering organisms as linear time. Because humans can only process order, measure order, recognize order, randomness is lost within ordering. But it can be perceived indirectly, because every predictable cycle is slightly modified by the unpredictable, and this unpredictability is gradually but consistently increasing. We can say that the Hindu cycles of cosmic rebirth will not be rebirths of a copy of the same Cosmos, but each rebirth will be slightly modified: in some life will not emerge, in others the forces will be so unbalanced that it will quickly deteriorate. I do not believe in all cases the cycles are uniform. only in the ones where life is possible the cycles must be relatively similar because of the space/time required for the cosmos to cool, for life to emerge, and for civilization to develop. Hindu cosmic cycles refer to these cosmic life cycles. The process is endless, so it is reasonable to assume that the same circumstances will repeat, in almost the same way, but never in exactly the same way. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Wed Nov 28, 2018 6:05 pm | |
| For us mere mortals it is of minimal importance, because even if the cosmos repeats there is no preservation fo memory, which is the definition of life and of 'self'. Memory is what connects life in a continuum. Nevertheless, it is fascinating to observe how most philosophical positing became popular, among the majority, only if they offered a comforting possibility, or offered a world-view that provided hope, or promised retribution or salvation. I've always been more sceptical about theories that made big promises. The bigger the promise the more bullshyte is involved in its cultivation. Humans are more likely to quiet their inner doubts if the theory offers them something they are desperate for, and quick to reject any theory that even hints are a conflict with their well-being, and sanity.
The concept of absolute order is hard to overcome, for life and an organism awakening to itself within the cosmos. There is no way it can abandon it, even if there is but a minuscule flaw in the antithetical theory. So, God has now become one, and universe....and omnipresence has become complexity, and Satan, the beguiler, has become chaos, complexity....because a known evil is better than an unknowable one.
But we are still a young species, and we have a lot of growing-up to do....if we make it our of our adolescence. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Wed Nov 28, 2018 6:54 pm | |
| Actually you can prove and disprove just about anything if you do some creative word-juggling and you rely on good ol God, the absent-absolute - have faith. He's such an omnipresent absence, and so impotently omnipotently all-powerful a deity....he's good for all kinds of psycho-work, creating fantasy realities and destroying actual reality.
All bow to the power of the Nil. he live sin each and one of us. No absolute certainty means anything is possible, and everything is impossible. There's just no objective way, whatsoever, to determine what is more from what is less probable. Not with our Lord God the absolute on stand-by. Always here, but nowhere.
If you ain't got absolute evidence, then I dismiss you as being wrong....and if you ain't got absolute disproof then whatever crap comes out of my mind is as good a guess as any. If I find a tiny little flaw, I can discount anything...and I can then base an balance a bulslhyte mountain on the tiniest of a hypothetical pin-points. So powerful is the absent-absolute. It's been saving cowards and hypocrites from themselves, for centuries. The 'god' that just will not die, though he's been declared dead many times....cannot die. Because 'he', 'it' exist in the minds of morons...and as long as there is one moron born into this world, the lord the absent-absolute is reborn with him, over and over, and when morons are permitted to propagate he grows powerful and becomes popular.
Although nobody has ever seem an immutable, indivisible, one, the idea does exist in the minds of morons, and it can be passed on from one idiotic mind to the next, via the word....'one,' or 'nil'...or 'god'....or whatever is positively and most certainly absolute...yet nowhere to be seen, so also absent. he surrounds us, because he is inside us; he discusses things with us, because he is us. Absolute evidence is the only thing that will do. But since the absolute only exists in the minds of morons, any hypothetical version will do, comforting the hearts and minds the world over, and across the ages. See with the absolute you can acquire absolute authority, and declare yourself god of existence, and creator of your own universe, and your own destiny....but, at the same time, if you are a bit of a coward, and want to escape responsibility, 'cause you've fucked things up, then you can use the exact same absolute, converting it into absolute nil, and deny all free-will. The conversion is easy....it all happens in the mind. No nasty reality to stand in the way....it's all about attitude and the 'correct' frame of mind = esoteric alchemy. It's an all-service pit-stop....buffoons and bitches will be serviced and pleasured to their heart's content.
One's balls will be inflated to supernatural proportions, and the others ovaries will gradually shrink, receding into the cavern of his abdomen, and then simply vanish from existence. Inflate, Deflate. Just blow some hot steaming farts into the orifice, shaping the sound into discernible words, using your sphincter. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Tue Dec 04, 2018 6:27 am | |
| The choice of words makes all the difference: The ancients imagined existence as a cauldron being struck, producing vibrations/oscillation. They named this 'Eros,' though some preferred the more accurate term 'Ananke'. Eros implied something antrhopic - intimate. Christians changed the term to 'agape', wanting to retain their connection to Hellenism, but to only associate with Platonism. Agape (love) was more parental, compared to the lustful erotic title. This seemingly insignificant alternation in choice of words makes all the difference. It does not expose the world but us in relation to it, because words are how we connect to reality; it is we communicating/communing with the world, and not the world with us. The world appears to us, or we awaken to its appearance, but it is we who wish to establish a beneficial, to us, relationship with it. The words we choose to approach world determines what kind of relationship it will become: will it be one of respect and honesty, or one of romantic idealism and pleasing lies and self-deception? In the end it is we, not the world, who needs this to be a 'good' relationship.
Some think 'pathos' (passion), would be a more appropriate alternative, others have proposed 'will'. Each choice with its own nuances, exposing the thinker's relationship with reality.
All these words refer to the same Energy, exhibiting momentum (movement), that is created, in some minds, but it need not be. Energy is a more objective term, avoiding the antrhopoic nuances of the previous. An energy field with topical variations of vibration/oscillation interacting. This interactivity is characterized by degree of harmony, understood, by us humans, as the attraction/repulsion force. Humans prefer to focus on the attraction component, emphasizing harmony, because humans are a product of it. The degree these oscillation harmonize determined the degree (potential) for them unifying, becoming congruent, forming larger unities. An excess of harmony, between these varying oscillations, determining the degree to which the repulsion force is overpowered.
Now most humans, driven by a deep rooted need, want this to be conscious, motivated by a judgement, an end in itself, so they choose words to describe this balance of harmony/disharmony in more anthropomorphic terms - alluding to it, because they cannot rationally justify it and it is unnecessary (cue Ananke = necessity/need). There is no Cosmic necessity to ascribe this interaction using anthropic principles, because unconscious forces of attraction/repulsion suffice to explain its multiple forms - Occam's Razor. The only necessity is a human one, and the precise need it feeds is exposed by the choice of anthropomorphizing words being chosen to describe attraction/repulsion. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Tue Dec 04, 2018 7:28 am | |
| If we approach the words one/nil as abstractions then we approach them as what they are: word/symbols, representing mental concepts. As tools they have a utility, and this utility gives them meaning. 'One' referring to any unity we wish to isolate from the background so as to bring it forward, into our conciousness, and benefit from clarity. 'Nil' would be its negation, in our mind, where it exists as an abstraction. One/Nil is part of a simple binary method of conceptualizing. It evolved precisely because it was simple and effective - sufficient to facilitate survival. Nature is frugal.
If misunderstood as being anything more than mental abstractions then the terms can lead to confusions, and paradoxes. in the mind the absolute exists as a concept, alluding to the mind's completion, and its simplifications/generalizations we call abstractions. 1/0 are two such abstractions. The mind simplifies fluctuating existence so as to make it comprehensible - reducing it to its simple binary code. It does so by selectively eliminating all dimensions not necessary to process and to assimilate data into an abstraction. Multi-Dimesional space/time is reduced to four-dimensional space/time possibilities/probabilities. The four code DNA is reduces to the duality of the 1/0 mental code. Fractions compensate for the loss, alluding to multi-dimensionality, and/or fluidity - infinite regress indicates the compromise made to facilitate comprehension.
A mind's sophistication can be measured by its ability to simplify/generalize reality without losing contact with the real. It does this through pattern recognition. Perception of patterns isolates the repeating component, distinguishing it as the necessary core...and its repetition reflecting its fluidity.
Because the binary system is a methodology, the organism can confuse its interpretation of reality, for reality itself - a painter mistaking his three-dimensional painting of a tree for the fluidity of the phenomenon tree itself. This is what occurs with the concept of 'absolute'. The fact that words can be used in multiple contexts aids in the self-deception. This refers back to the previous post and how the choice of words indicates the thniker's won needs/desires, slightly modifying the meaning by choosing a particular word, or applying it in a specific manner.
Absolute can indicate a theoretical indivisible, immutable concept, or it may express a degree exceeding the norm. In the former it refers to a non-existent phenomenon, and in the latter it refers to a level of certainty, a degree of conviction that makes doubt insignificant.
In both it refers to a relationship, as do all words, between subject and object/objective. In the first the objective is non-existent, remaining a noetic construct, an abstraction, with no reference outside the mind; in the second it indicates a triangulating relationship between phenomena in relation to the observer.
The absolute, as an immutable, indivisible, phenomenon, is non-existent, but it can be represented by the usual binary codes of 1/0, and it has the added benefit of alluding to a level of conviction exceeding all scepticism. The words has a double-meaning, one supporting the other.
The (0), nil has an additional benefit, exploited by minds identifying with its nullification power. Accepted as an absolute it can serve both to support any hypothesis that lacks absolute validation,or it can serve to nullify any hypothesis that is also lacking in absoluteness...so it is applicable in relation to all theories....as it, like the 'one' can refer to anything and everything, in other words to nothing. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 36827 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Words Tue Dec 04, 2018 8:07 am | |
| When we synthesize a factual relationship we sample our experiences and human knowledge - in other words we use precedent as a guide to establish a 'beyond reasonable doubt' relationship, such as elephants are alrger than mice. We sample precedent to establish a higher probability, exceeding scepticism. But mice and elephants are not absolutes, since they are mutable, divisible, and mortal. The use of the word 'absolute' to quantify our certainty, is meant as a metaphor, a hyperbole, expressing our convictions in relation to the factual relationship between mice and elephants. Nihilists will chime in, here, using the absence of absolute precedent, and absolute facts to nullify all degrees of certainty: since nobody can ever have absolute knowledge then it is possible for mice to be larger than elephants. This how they exploit absolute nil to their disingenuous advantage. Most are recovering absolute faith believers, that had fallen victim to the word-games of Marxism and Abrahamism, so they compensate for their poor-judgment and naivete, with absolute scepticism. No theory, or factual relationship can ever attain their absolutist criterion, leaving them 'free' to believe in whatever absurdity feels good. Unable to think rationally, or to accept what is revealed, they opt out of the process of approximating higher from lower probabilities, reducing all to a uniformity of possibilities, where the tie-breaker is emotion and/or pleasure = hedonism is the underlying pathos of all nihilistic dogmas, including the Abrahamic triad.
It's the absolutist other/or dilemma....based on 1/0. If not absolute oneness (omnipotence, omniscience, absolute certainty), then absolute nullification (ignorance, feebleness, absolute uncertainty). _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Sponsored content
| | | | |
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |
|