Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalFAQMemberlistSearchRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 Satyrnalium

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1 ... 7 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
AuthorMessage
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Tue Feb 07, 2017 6:35 pm

As was predicted, with the end of homosexuality coming out of the closet, we can now see how transgender psychosis is in full swing, edging towards full social acceptance.
Psychology of victims permitting every dysfunctional individual to claim being 'wronged' and demanding full and complete social acceptance.

What dysfunction is next?
Well, as soon as the transgender issue fizzles, and becomes mainstream like homosexuality, the next sexual dysfunction to demand acceptance will be either bestiality or, more likely, paedophilia.
It's more likely that Bestiality will follow the 'normalization' of paedophilia, because it has to go through some additional steps through the elimination of species bias, and the whole issue of consent.
Bestiality will have to argue that animals offer consent in non-verbal; gestures, or behaviours, such as wagging the tail, or whatnot.
For this reason I predict paedophilia as the next sexual dysfunction, the next paraphilic behaviour to demand their 'rights'.
Pedophiles will argue against age bias, as transsexuals and homosexuals argued against sexual functionality bias and gender bias.
Pedophiles will demand we rid ourselves of ageism, and claim that sex and love is good and healthy, no matter what age you are.  

How long this will take, I do not know. We still have strong biases against pedophiles, and iti will take a generation or two of strong pop-cultural social engineering to prepare the groundwork,a s they did with homosexuals and transsexuals.
If there is no social push-back, or the system does not collapse, transsexuals will go mainstream in the next generation.
Asking "what's your gender identity?" will be part of the normal dating scene.
That's when paedophilia will ascend, and take the same path homosexuality and transgenders too towards normalization.
Once paedophilia goes mainstream, it will be the time for bestiality.
At some point marriages between infants and old adults will be nothing to comment on without facing prison and attacks like "you are a age hater" or something having to do with hating youth or old people.
Bestiality will be the 'taking down' of the species boundaries. Species prejudices.
It would be interesting to see how they normalize inter-species marriages, demanding the recognition of man-animal love, or families.

All this may sound weird and funny and disgusting to you, now, but I remind you that if you told a man or woman, in the fifties, of how in the early 2000nds homosexual marriage would be 'normal' and transsexuals would be demanding to be called by their unique pronouns they would have laughed, and called you insane, wondering if you were sane or not.
We're in an Age where something as basic as sex is being denied its natural functionality.
The dis-ease is spreading, and growing in boldness.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Thu Feb 09, 2017 11:06 am

Maintaining a steady level of anxiety, fear/stress, releases excessive energies, converting them from repressed, explosive energies, to nervous tension, released in a constant harmless stream.

Anxiety demands placation, relief.
Consuming food, taking narcotics, purchasing a new item, as a 'positive' compensation of promise offering a buyer's 'high', relieves it.
anxiety floods the mind with insecurity. It seeks comfort in others, or in distraction.

Zombificaiton is the outcome.
How are zombies, the metaphor, depicted in film?
Mindless, shuffling aimlessly, attracted by sound, congregating into huge groups because their hunger and their attraction o sound, forces them to converge in the same places.
Their 'organization' is based no their automatic reactions, and their insatiable hunger for health and vigour, represented by flesh and blood - an inner void that can never be satisfied.



_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:16 am

Attracting a pattern implies it be drawn close and assimilated, by harmonizing it, to whatever degree it can be.
Attraction follows the path-of-least-resistance. Patterns drawn towards each other in relation to other patterns - being more in harmony means less resistance, less repulsion. Path-of-least-resistance describes this lower resistance, we cal attraction, just as power describes a degree of weakness, knowledge a degree of ignorance.
Patterns differ in rate of oscillation/vibration, frequency, and rhythm.
Harmonization between similar patterns means the coincidence of rhythms - the stronger pattern, or congruity of patterns, imposing its rhythm upon the weaker one.

Organically this becomes the process of assimilating nutrients - feeding.
Replenishing the organism's aggregate energies, the patterns in congruence losing to attrition their sum-total of aggregate energies, and the field of attraction/repulsion effect.
Only iterating congruities, such as organisms, or what we call life, can willfully direct the congruence towards or away from other patterns.
This primary movement towards and away, reflecting attraction/repulsion, become fight/flight, good/bad, binary logic, and dualism.
A primitive organism does not have the processing sophistication to identify nuances. All it has evolved the capacity to do is generalize: towards/away, then evolving into a more sophisticated discrimination of friend/foe, edible, inedible, then higher, more discriminating, and more abstract, good/bad, good/evil, 1/0.
Binary logic founded on absolutes: one/nil, beginning with the one, the thing: something/nothing.
The relationship of opposites is a relationship of subjective, simplifications/generalizations - abstractions based on the easy to evolve neurological of on/off.
Degree of fluidity, between the nerve pulse and the nerve cell, perceived and categorized in relation to the observer as energy/matter.
Fluidity, dynamism, reduced to binary code.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:01 pm

Today I heard a Greek politician, named Georgiadis, speak a truth.
He's one of the few who speaks so honestly and directly, and this gets him into trouble, which makes him my favourite.
He is also a avid reader of ancient Greek, text, being a book seller, and a gifted orator.
His weakness is his voice...shrill.

What he said is that the problem with modern Greece, and its economic issues, goes back to the ancient times, explaining the fact that despite them being superior to any other people they never could translate this superiority into world domination.
The Greek trait that makes them charming, child-like, and also forever unable to dominate as a group, is forgetfulness.
They forget as easily as a child.
Quote :
[22b] and by recounting the number of years occupied by the events mentioned he tried to calculate the periods of time. Whereupon one of the priests, a prodigiously old man, said, "O Solon, Solon, you Greeks are always children: there is not such a thing as an old Greek." And on hearing this he asked, "What mean you by this saying?" And the priest replied, "You are young in soul, every one of you. For therein you possess not a single belief that is ancient and derived from old tradition, nor yet one science that is hoary with age.

This gives them a certain appeal, charm, makes them delightful to be around, but it also makes them inept, unable to assert themselves, but only be infectious.
Did not Nietzsche make such an observation?
Their resilience is found in their ability to dominate unintentionally.
Every new circumstance fresh and new as if it had not occurred before.
Unable to hold a grudge, to become vindictive until Christianity took hold of them.
They could never build upon their experiences.
They continuously forgot, and reaffirmed.
Lethe.
Aletheia...to un-forget. To re-call.
Germans could never forget. Nor Nietzsche.
Nor can I.

And so, as Seferis, the poet wrote...


Seferis wrote:
Όπου και  να ταξιδέψω η Ελλάδα με πληγώνει

Στο Πήλιο μέσα στις καστανιές το πουκάμισο του Κενταύρου
γλιστρούσε μέσα στα φύλλα για να τυλιχτεί στο κορμί μου
καθώς ανέβαινα την ανηφόρα κι η θάλασσα μ’ ακολουθούσε
ανεβαίνοντας κι αυτή σαν τον υδράργυρο θερμομέτρου
ως που να βρούμε τα νερά του βουνού.

Στη Σαντορίνη αγγίζοντας νησιά που βουλιάζαν
ακούγοντας να παίζει ένα σουραύλι κάπου στις αλαφρόπετρες
μου κάρφωσε το χέρι στην κουπαστή
μια σαΐτα τιναγμένη ξαφνικά
από τα πέρατα μιας νιότης βασιλεμένης.

Στις Μυκήνες σήκωσα τις μεγάλες πέτρες και τους θησαυρούς των Ατρειδών
και πλάγιασα μαζί τους στο ξενοδοχείο της "Ωραίας Ελένης του Μενελάου".
Χάθηκαν μόνο την αυγή που λάλησε η Κασσάνδρα
μ’ έναν κόκορα κρεμασμένο στο μαύρο λαιμό της.
Στις Σπέτσες στον Πόρο και στη Μύκονο
με χτίκιασαν οι βαρκαρόλες.

Τι θέλουν όλοι αυτοί που λένε
πως βρίσκουνται στην Αθήνα ή στον Πειραιά;
Ο ένας έρχεται από Σαλαμίνα και ρωτάει τον άλλο μήπως "έρχεται εξ Ομονοίας"
"Όχι έρχομαι εκ Συντάγματος" απαντά κι είν’ ευχαριστημένος
"βρήκα το Γιάννη και με κέρασε ένα παγωτό".
Στο μεταξύ η Ελλάδα ταξιδεύει
δεν ξέρουμε τίποτε δεν ξέρουμε πως είμαστε ξέμπαρκοι όλοι εμείς
δεν ξέρουμε την πίκρα του λιμανιού σαν ταξιδεύουν όλα τα καράβια,
περιγελάμε εκείνους που τη νιώθουν.

Παράξενος κόσμος που λέει πως βρίσκεται στην Αττική
και δε βρίσκεται πουθενά.
Αγοράζουν κουφέτα για να παντρευτούνε
κρατούν "σωσίτριχα" φωτογραφίζουνται.
Ο άνθρωπος που είδα σήμερα καθισμένος σ’ ένα φόντο με πιτσούνια και με λουλούδια
δέχουνταν το χέρι του γέρο φωτογράφου να του στρώνει τις ρυτίδες
που είχαν αφήσει στο πρόσωπό του
όλα τα πετεινά τ’ ουρανού.

Στο μεταξύ η Ελλάδα ταξιδεύει ολοένα ταξιδεύει
κι αν "ορώμεν ανθούν πέλαγος Αιγαίον νεκροίς"
είναι εκείνοι που θέλησαν να πιάσουν το μεγάλο καράβι με το κολύμπι
εκείνοι που βαρέθηκαν να περιμένουν τα καράβια που δεν μπορούν να κινήσουν
την ΕΛΣΗ τη ΣΑΜΟΘΡΑΚΗ τον ΑΜΒΡΑΚΙΚΟ.

Σφυρίζουν τα καράβια τώρα που βραδιάζει στον Πειραιά
σφυρίζουν ολοένα σφυρίζουν μα δεν κουνιέται κανένας αργάτης
καμμιά αλυσίδα δεν έλαμψε βρεμένη στο στερνό φως που βασιλεύει
ο καπετάνιος μένει μαρμαρωμένος μες στ’ άσπρα και στα χρυσά.

Όπου και να ταξιδέψω η Ελλάδα με πληγώνει
παραπετάσματα βουνών αρχιπέλαγα γυμνοί γρανίτες...
το καράβι που ταξιδεύει το λένε ΑΓΩΝΙΑ 937




Wherever I may travel Greece wounds me....


 

Quote :
Με μια πιρόγα φεύγεις και γυρίζεις
τις ώρες που αγριεύει η βροχή
στη γη των Βησιγότθων αρμενίζεις
και σε κερδίζουν κήποι κρεμαστοί
μα τα φτερά σου σιγοπριονίζεις

Σκέπασε αρμύρα το γυμνό κορμί σου
σου `φερα απ’ τους Δελφούς γλυκό νερό
στα δύο είπες πως θα κοπεί η ζωή σου
και πριν προλάβω τρις να σ’ αρνηθώ
σκούριασε το κλειδί του παραδείσου

Το καραβάνι τρέχει μες στη σκόνη
και την τρελή σου κυνηγάει σκιά
πώς να ημερέψει ο νους μ’ ένα σεντόνι
πώς να δεθεί η Μεσόγειος με σχοινιά
αγάπη που σε λέγαμ’ Αντιγόνη

Ποια νυχτωδία το φως σου έχει πάρει
και σε ποιο γαλαξία να σε βρω
εδώ είναι Αττική φαιό νταμάρι
κι εγώ ένα πεδίο βολής φτηνό
που ασκούνται βρίζοντας ξένοι φαντάροι



In a pirogue you leave and re-turn
in the hours when the rain becomes wild
in the land of Visigoth you sail
and hanging gardens win you over
but, you are slowly saw your own wings

Salt covered your naked body
I brought you, from Delfi, fresh water
In two, you said that your life would be cut
And before I could deny you thrice
The key, of paradise, rusted

The caravan runs through the dust
and, your mad shadow, it chases
How could a sheet tame the mind
How could the Mediterranean be bound by ropes
Love, who's was called Antigone

Which night melody has stolen your light
And in which galaxy can I find you
Here is Attica, a grey quarry
And me, a cheap shooting range
Where foreign soldiers train, cursing




_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν


Last edited by Satyr on Thu Feb 16, 2017 2:04 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Thu Feb 16, 2017 11:55 am

When people are too content, for too long, they begin looking for ways to stress themselves.

All the energies that would have been expunged with stress begin to accumulate.
no artificial method can sufficiently deal with them, and not for long.
No porn, no sporting activity, no extreme activity, no movie can continuously rid the individual of what accumulates easily.
No narcotic, distraction, can do the job for long.

The mind returns to the need to expel excess, and because it has not truly experienced extreme lack, living in artificially maintained environments of superfluity, it begins to lose contact with the source of this excess. It degrades it in value, because the effort required to accumulate it was minimal. It wastes what it can no longer feel pleasure in expunging.
Bit, by bit, it becomes bored, with itself and with the entire process.

The fundamentals are too easy, so it looks for a thrill in the mundane.

When philosophy is shared among such minds, its value is lost in convenience.
They need the extraordinary, the supernatural, the exceptional to feel something is being accomplished.
In their heads they begin toying with reality, wanting to fabricate an exciting experience.  

For those born and raised in such sheltering circumstances the absence of an experience with lack, with suffering, with loss, leads them towards increasingly excessive wastefulness.
There is no absurdity too large for them to pull back, for they know not what will come, having to experience other than excess, and costs too small to matter.
The desire to experience existence as need/suffering drives them further and further towards the edge of their tolerance.
Some, overstep the boundary, and finally feel what they craved in a final epiphany.
Most, pull back once their tolerance levels are exceeded, which are not great, because they've been sheltered.
They then dismiss the edge of their comfort levels as a line nobody ought to cross, wanting to hide their inability to tolerate reality further.


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Sat Feb 18, 2017 11:14 am

Unable to completely break free from their comfortable presuppositions, the Nihilists shifts from Abrahamic religion, to Marxism, and from Humanism to Transhumanism.

God's authority is replaced by the State's and then by the Human's.
Each authority detached from reality, and converted to a pure noetic construct - Ideal.
The underlying necessary presupposition is that all order must be the product of a conscious, rational, mind.
Natural order must either be created by a god, or by man, or in liberalism by a collective of agreeing humans.
Order is not dis-covered already made, but it is willfully created out of nothing.
Not reported, objectively, but constructed, subjectively, and then supported collectively, or imposed violently.

Abrahamic Nihilism has no been abandoned, it has been adapted, adjusted, preserving its core elements.
The collective bonding principle being morality.
How many does the idea integrate and keep safe, from the world beyond?

God is replaced by the vague abstraction of morality, as God's word, or State law.
Humanity idealized, their collective will expressed through morality - love/hate the moral ingredients replacing good/evil.

The Nihilistic, pure noumenon/abstraction, God, is replaced by State, and finally by the idealized, sanctified concept of Humanity.
God's word, becomes State rule, and then Human morality.
Morality ceases to be an evolved method of integrating organisms into cohesive groups, surrendering a portion of freedom to be compensated for by an increase in the degree of potential survival, and it becomes, like Divine love, like State law, a binding authority.
As pure abstraction it can be invoked in any circumstance, as a form of peer-pressure, or justification, when no reasons or arguments can be found to confront a threatening world.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Sun Feb 19, 2017 10:03 am

Symbiosis and Parasitism
The Art of Plagiarism


A thief enters the home of a wealthy man to take what he cannot earn, or make, on his own.
He pawns what he steals, as if he took ownership of them.
Every day his halls are emptied, by the thief, the wealthy man replaces what has been stolen, with newer, more brilliant, for elaborate luxurious artifacts, and every night the thief enters his home, as he sleeps, to take it away and present it as his own.
The wealthy man does not care, but is only irritated by the thief's ingratitude.
He appreciates the thief's efforts, because it allows him to update his ornaments, and create alternates to what he has created, or it allows him to replace, with a copy, slightly improved, what has been stolen.    


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Tue Feb 21, 2017 6:12 pm

Master/Slave

Master, feeling weak before world, learns to dominate other organisms to deal with this weakness, and in so doing suppresses the inferior, imposing upon them an added burden.
Slave, feeling vulnerable before world and oppressed by those who use them to cope with the world feel resentful towards the first.
Nietzsche's master/slave morality.

Words, in this context, connect the master to the world they must deal with, and the way they deal with it is to invent a manipulative language to keep the slaves down - they take an evolved social behavior, emerging in social species to integrate independent organisms into a cooperative whole and use it to keep the slaves down, and working for them.
They sell their way of life, which helps them cope with the world, as a 'good' the slave must compare himself to, to find self-worth.
They invent good/evil in relation to their values which imposes a rule of conduct, and a standard that keeps the slave working for the maintenance of their method of coping with a world they feel vulnerable within.
They invent good/evil, imposing it as a moral standard, and they place themselves as the ideal, the good.
Slaves rebel inverting this - Nihilism.

All this is psychology.
Although psychology is part of philosophy, as are all the disciplines we call science, and although it describes how a social organism reacts and copes with the world, the terms good/evil, no longer apply to the cosmos, in the sense of a morality if we exit this social context of morality and how organisms relate to each other, when confronted by world, and explore cosmos independent from master/slave morality.
Then good/evil no longer makes sense, and the words good/bad replace them, momentarily, as we exit from the social context into the life context where socializing is not universal, but a specific method of survival.
If we proceed to extricate our thinking from the subjectivity of living organisms we then find that good/bad are meaningless.

There is no good/evil, morality, and no good/bad, but only in relation to a living organism, in the latter case, and a living organism using social cooperation as its method of dealing with world, in the former.
Morality is meaningless outside life, form the perspective of an organism evolved to be dependent on others of its own kind. for such a mind to detach itself form moral concepts is to condemn itself to certain death, an evil in itself.
It is trapped in its own evolved predisposition.
It must try to think outside moral rules, and to do so is an immoral act, of self-destruction.

Words become weapons and tools of oppression and dominance - of asserting self over others.
But to apply the same words, in the same way, outside this context is meaningless.  
using good/evil, is just as meaningless as using good/bad, when trying to describe the world independent of life and living interests and the dispositions they produce.

If we are to free ourselves from this restricting and limited way of philosophizing we must use this predisposition, subjectivity, as a necessary and inescapable starting point, and then extricate ourselves from the judgment, objectivity, where good/bad become orientation tools, not absolute terms.
So, while we cannot break away form using ourselves as the middle, to distinguish and categorize matter and energy, or light from dark, or warm form cold, we can realize that these designations are relative to how we use self as the middle, the standard.

Going beyond means finding the standard by which we can evaluate ourselves, and others independent from our subjectivity being used as the mid point.
Instead of evaluating self in relation to other humans, or within human environments, we can evaluate self, in relation to world, which incorporates others but does not make them the central point of our standard.
Now, words no longer have value in the way they can manipulate and exploit inferior others, or place ourselves as the standard these others must measure themselves against, but have a utility, helping us evaluate self, and our choices, behavior in relation to an indifferent cosmos.    

A master affirming self does not involve a declaration he is convinced of, or he convinces others of, as being 'good', but must come from how he, in relation to others, relate to world, just as he lives by continuously rejecting what is outside his ordering, becoming.  
It does not matter what he says or thinks, nor does it matter what these others say and think, what matters is what they do, how they act, behave, and how this relates to the world that neither thinks or speaks, but still relates to organism as force, as persistent, indifferent, (inter)activity.

Beauty ceases to be about individual taste, at any given time, or preference built on social conventions and attitudes, but becomes a measure of an accumulated resistance to world, built on generations of resisting attrition.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Fri Feb 24, 2017 9:30 am

Walking among Silent Legends
In times of great turmoil and stress, through some chance configuration of predisposition and circumstance, an otherwise obscure figure can come to become a legend, to be recalled, for generations to come, as a mythological icon, his feats exaggerated and what part chance played in his deeds attributed to the power of his will.
Although a remarkable and rare figure, he is by no means the only.
How many, with the same predisposition, within the same circumstances vanished in obscurity, could only be explained as the circumstantial configurations of the known and unknown we call luck.

We can say the same about infamous thinkers, explorers, lovers, and historical villains.
Perhaps we walk among those who given a different environment could emerge, releasing untapped potential, as great benefactors or great monsters.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Sat Feb 25, 2017 7:57 am

When people say their lives have no meaning what they mean is they do not know themselves, in relation to world, have no goal, as a consequence, and therefore cannot focus on anything.
They are confused, going from one goal to the other.

If we apply my definition of meaning as how patterns (inter)act, or how phenomena, which is another way of saying a congruence of multiple patterns, (inter)relate: web of relationships...and then we incorporate my definition of truth, as the noetic representation, of said relationships, a copy of perceived patterns (inter)acting and the relationships we perceive, then the absence of meaning indicates an inability to perceive these relationships.
If we, then, also incorporate how i define idea(l), as a projected goal, objective, then the picture is clarified.

A mind suffering from an absence of meaning, in its life, is expressing a dissatisfaction with its ideal, and its perception of relationships to guide it towards its fulfillment.
The reasons for this can vary.
Anything from idealizing an unrealistic objective, in other words an objective it cannot perceive outside its mind, or an inability to perceive relationships to help it find its way to this projected ideal, or a disillusionment with an ideal, once it has been partially achieved, or approached, making it cynical towards all ideals...and so on.

This is all a [product of being unable to perceive and/or accept the world as it is.
The delusion that the world ought to offer meaning, results in the delusion of projecting a false, unrealistic, ideal to motivate and guide self.
This leaves the mind feeling void of meaning, of guidance, of direction.
It, either demands meaning to be given to it, or having constructed meaning, according to its own expectations, needs, it fails to move towards it....because it is unrealistic, it fails to account for how phenomenon (inter)relate.
It fails to take responsibility for this condition, so it blames world, Nihilism, or the other, the world, for failing to adapt to its expectations, needs.

To put it another way...
A erroneous subjective interpretation of the objective world can only result in failure.
a healthy mind uses this failure to adapt, adjust, its subjective interpretations of objective world.
A sick mind accuses others for its failure, or accuses the objective world because it failed to adapt, adjust to its subjective interpretations of it.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Fri Mar 03, 2017 5:05 pm

To understand the Hellenic spirit from an organic perspective, you must begin with the environment they evolved within: sea faring, fluid, as opposed to more terrestrial, fixed, enclosed peoples giving rise to more stringent, fixed, memes.
The reason why Greeks, to this very day, cannot establish an organized system is rooted in this inherited past.
The moment they dominate, they are no longer there.
They have forgotten, swept away to other shores.
They cannot build on their victories because they are always seeking new battles where the odds are stalked against them.
Let us ignore the Modern variant, infected by Abrahamic nihilism, thinking it is owes eternity, that it deserves paradise as compensation for its earthly suffering, the true Greek has forgotten what he won, what he earned, what he has.
Sacking Troy he then must cast upon the tides, towards his homeland, with an unknown fate in the immediate distance.
Little time to wallow in accolades and conquered lands, like Alexander, he must return, closer to home, before he goes off again.
Unlike the Germanic spirit that consolidates, gathers, defends what has been gained, the Greek splurges his gains with his friends and loved ones, and then awakens with a hangover and empty coffers, forcing him to begin, once more.

Women were the only ones who kept the fires going.
Why do you think they had to return home when others carried with them their gains, collecting and hoarding them, carrying them across the deserts?
The sea was the Geek's home - the bounty of his nature.
Their ships were their only solid ground, floating on fluid turmoil.

Was this not their charm, their talent, their flexibility on the waves, dealing with tides and winds?
With no solid earth, under their feet, was not their spirit one of a mature child, playing, glad to be alive for one more day, melancholic, and nostalgic for a shore that will not hold them for long?
There is no army on the seas.
There are only a band of individuals, licking the salt from their brow, sharing the struggles with the ocean.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Sat Mar 04, 2017 6:18 pm

Superior - What dominates within a given environment.
What dominates in all environments is the most superior of all.
Why did man dominate all the other lifeforms on earth?
He was not the fastest, the strongest, the most virile, the biggest, the most prolific and flexible organism on the planet, and yet he dominated organisms.

To understand what distinguishes one man from another, one race from another, one species form another, you must begin with what dominates man from other beasts.
What traits did man have that could overcome a superiority in others?
Human traits so powerful that they would threaten man's own existence.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Sun Mar 05, 2017 5:15 pm

To fully appreciate the quality of a civilization we must begin by appreciating the difference between quantity and quality, with some basic metaphors.
Which is one of the longest living organisms on the planet earth?
Methuselah Tree
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Which organisms live longest?
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Here its temporal signature is measured over long period of space/time because its impact is minimal.
But what if a shorter lifespan can have a far greater temporal signature - measured by an impact over a condensed period of space/time?

How would this manifest in real-time?

Let's take the species homo sapient.
Not the longest living organism on the planet, but by far the one with the greatest impact, manifesting as dominance over organisms faster, stronger, more prolific and with longer lifespans.

Not an organism with a greater lifespan than this species:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Not larger than this species:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Not faster than this species:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Not able to reproduce more than this species:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Not more durable than this species:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Not even as stronger as its relative, this species:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

But what trait, or set of traits, could make such a feeble, by comparison, species, as man dominate them all?
What wet of traits could have helped this one species overpower the gorilla, outmatch the whale, outrun the cheetah, more prolific than a rabbit, make it more durable than a rhino, and one day help it outlive the tortoise and, perhaps, the Methuselah Tree?
What can be that powerful?

The distinguishing human trait that helps this species dominate all other organism is the same trait that makes man as the organism with the greatest temporal signature, over the shortest length of space/time, and it is this same set of traits which help man have the greatest, by far, impact, surpassing stronger, faster, longer-living, producing more young, more resilient organism.
What applies to organisms also applies to Super-organisms or what we call cultures....genes to memes.
Civilizations may be bigger, stronger, longer in duration, more resilient, and yet surpassed by civilizations that make a greater impact, or that can dominate them, as man dominates life forms it cannot compete with, or outperforms in any other way but one.
So, we can admit that some races are faster, stronger, more prolific and resilient, and even posses a faster processing speed, but only one race can and did dominate because it had this trait, or set of traits, in abundance.
It is these same traits that made man dominate other species, and help each individual man dominate other men, and also helped some civilizations stand apart from all others, to where we still talk about them and live in accordance to the principles they established.    
To understand the how and the why, is to understand the difference between quality and quantity, or why cockroaches may survive a nuclear war, or a meteorite fall, similar to the one they say exterminated the dinosaurs, but they cannot be compared to the species homo sapient in quality.
Human is the species that has outperformed every known species thus far.

These set of traits is called intelligence, or sometimes referred to as wisdom, homo sapient literally means, in Latin, wise man, and it is a trait that has to do with time, over space, where space is possibility and time is movement within possibility, or what we experience as change, and it also has to do with perceiving patterns within the patterns (inter)acting.
It is the same principles used in martial arts, where a weaker man, adequately trained and disciplined, can defeat a far stronger opponent by focusing his weaker energies upon a smaller time/space.
It is why the 300 of Leonidas, really 1000 if you include the 800 from Thebes, could hold back a greater Persian military force, for so long.
A clear display of quality overpowering quantity.

What is this temporal advantage?

Answer that and you will understand why, as least for me, the question what race would you rather be, is not even a question.
Negroes have, on average, larger penises, and they run faster and have larger muscle mass ratios, and testosterone levels, and I would still not want to be one, because this one trait, or set of traits under one name, is the quintessentially human trait - the trait that distinguishes this species from all others, and individuals within the species from all others, and the trait I use to evaluate all.
This trait is not uniquely human, no more than running is uniquely the cheetah's trait, or size is the whale's trait, or reproductive virility is the rabbit's trait but it is, by degree, what distinguishes and differentiates.

Comprehending this demands a definition of the trait, or set of traits we call intelligence and/or wisdom.
Not to idealize and mystify them, but to place them within world, nature, reality, explaining pragmatically why the species homo sapient is so dominant, but also explaining why Europeans dominated, and why certain civilizations still dominate, though they have been long eclipsed by their offspring.
Why did the sub-Saharan African produce civilizations of no significance?
Why, despite their higher IQs, did not Asians discover North America nor establish cultures with the impact of Hellenism, or even its offspring the Roman Empire?
They called is Daemon....now associated with satanic forces.
What was this Promethean spirit?

It has to do with time/space if these concepts are accurately defined, and not understood in the superficial way moderns do.
Space & Time, and organism, as ordering within this disordering.

It has to do with field of effect, or the field of (inter)activity as attraction/repulsion.
It has to do with why matter/mass (inter)acts within more dimensions, broader space/time, whereas energy does not, sometimes passing right through matter without (inter)acting with it.
It has to do with how order is accurately defined, and also chaos.
It has to do with beauty, and how it is not in the eye of the beholder.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:04 am

Environment directs need, just as nature directs nurture.
When the tribes that were to become known as Hellenes descended into the Mediterranean peninsula, from the north their mode of transport tells us that they had no knowledge of the seas, either because the lands they came from had no access to any large body of water, or their needs were met with practices that did not have to develop seafaring.
What they found was a more developed civilization they had to submit to, and live with, learning, from them, the ways of the sea, because the territory lacked fertile lands, and herds of prey, on a scale found elsewhere.
The story of the Minoan Taurus, Minotaur, and the maze, speaks of a symbiotic relationship, where yearly, some say every seven or nine years, sacrifices were offered to the dominant civilization.
Seven maidens and youths were offered to appease the hunger of the Minoans.

Three large family groups representing the three major tribes of Hellenes:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Doric, Ionians, Aeolians.
Dorics settles for the harshness of the Greek peninsula, cultivating a stringent lifestyle to adapt to its severity.
The Ionians turned to the sea, compensating for nature's frugality, by seeking the bounties of the Aegean.
It is this turning to the sea, and the meager bountifulness, of its rocky, arid mainland that shaped the Hellenic spirit, through this conflict between Doric disciplined severity and Ionian flexible innovation combining to produce the wonder that we call Hellas.
Ionian exploration returned to Greece with wonders from around the Mediterranean basin, where the Doric mind sifted through it to select what was valuable from what was superfluous, digesting it, as were the sacrificed maidens and youths, by the beast within the maze.
The strength of the Hellenic spirit, developed through this process of necessity, was too much for the Romans to defeat, and though they conquered the eternally competing and bickering tribes of Greece, they were, in turn, conquered by its spirit.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Fri Mar 10, 2017 5:35 pm

Piece by piece they dismembered them, [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], swallowing their hearts, wearing their skins, adorned with their symbols, as they returned to the seas, from where they came from.
Predators assimilating souls from around the middle of the earth's womb.
Consuming, and when consumed altering their hosts into another version of themselves.
Each victim torn apart by strong digestive liquids, becoming one more character in their repertoire.
Slowly they became daemons only an inversion of themselves could challenge. an illness shredding their many charming facades until their core remained exposed.
A spirit so strong it made all others flee, praying that it will die of its own accord.
But it did not die.
It slowly buried itself in the earth, upon which the oceans they took to eroded day by day.
In time they will be un-covered and re-turned, and a new golden age shall blow upon their sails. .


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Sat Mar 11, 2017 7:08 am

Fighting a weak opponent does not require much effort, or any severe adjustment.
Fighting a formidable opponent requires effort and adjustment equal to his quality in relation to your own.
To survive the fight you must change your methods in relation to his, alter your tactics to his parries and thrusts.
Every cut an indication of a necessary change.

The hunter, if he is to be successful, changes his behaviors to reflect that of his intended prey.
The essence of his prey forces upon him an adjustment of actions and thoughts.
If the predator specializes in the harvesting of that particular prey, then the prey forces it to evolve in relation to it.
Ancient hunters used to consume their prey's heart, in a symbolic gesture of their symbiotic convergence.  

When two lovers bond, their disharmonious traits gradually adjust to accommodate the others, until a confluence of behaviors places them upon the same trajectory - such is congruence of patterns on a metaphysical level expressed on the physical one.
Shared lives means shared rhythms, diets, environments.
Women's menstrual cycles harmonize, men's attitudes coincide, mates begin to look like one another, acting and thinking in harmony their spirits merge into a sometimes turbulent common conflict with environment, and sometimes settling in a calm, easy, deep movement of currents, betraying nothing on its surface - lovers begin communicating beneath the intelligible, the observable.
This covert convergence beginning with what is called mirroring - an unconscious physical reflection of the one who has captured their spirit, absorbing them sweeping them away in a physical dance of moment in agreement, in unpretentious imitation.    

A powerful spirit having survived many encounters with the alien has acquired a piece of each of them.
Scars, traits, tactics, ideas, deportment, casual gestures, symbols worn on his sleeve, words spoken from his lips, all remnants of his encounter with an adversary that marked him, or her, for life.
A powerful spirit is not buried by his adjustments, his wounds scared over thicker. He is not burdened by the trophies of his vanquished foes.
What he was, he still is, shinning through the experiences, having been absorbed into his being.
A daemonic spirit can harvest from its multiple encounters different attitudes, demeanour, and not be lost in them, as a schizophrenic is.
He has defeated, whereas the latter is defeated, or suffers from the consequences of a Pyrrhic victory, he did not entirely survive - like a crippled tree broken by a windstorm it could not entirely resist.

Such is the history of men, and of cultures - genes and memes.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:47 pm

The tale of morality is one about an organism relating to its environment.
It's reaction and its solution is one of forced compromises made for the sake of utility.
Success of such responses to the world establishes them as genetic dispositions.
The organism opts for the lesser cost by sacrificing a part of its independence to the group it seeks an advantage within.
The notion of a sacrifice has become part of its ongoing struggle to tolerate those that offer it an advantage. It mourns and worships what it has given up.

Organisms relating to a specific kind of environment only slightly modifies how all kinds of organisms can relate to all possible environments. there is a common thread running through all social unities, and where there is divergence it can be found in how the specific organism relates to its specific environment.
A modification that determines the particular ideals that may come to represent this sacrifice, as part of the group's shared cost, for the sake of a common benefit.
A symbol, and then an icon, must be found to represent this shared ideal, and an altar placed before it symbolically sacrificing their shared, and very individual costs.
From this simple mechanism social behavior emerges and evolves into more complex social systems.
Common ideals can be found across them all, starting with the most primal social groupings, diverging only in how they reacted to their particular environment, and which reactions proved to be the most useful.
Something so small that can, in time, produce the difference between the Incas, and the Romans.

We can trace the moral drive all the way back to the lowly cell, participating in a sophisticated organic complexity.

Relative to an environment of increasing randomness we may consider the creation of increasingly complex unities as a natural process of sacrificing for the sake of survival, and awareness of this process as an awakening that may choose to divert from it.
This establishes the possibility of the emergence of a noble being, that places something higher than the sacrifice of self to necessity, as its guiding ideal.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Mon Mar 13, 2017 12:33 pm

So sick, with desire, Modern man has become that he would rather live in paradox than face the source of his disease.
He wilfully lives in perplexing mysticism, unable to face the world nuder the bright light of the sun.
For him the contradictions in his own beliefs are a source of pride, than shame; they validate himself, as the one denying life, rather than forcing him to reconsider his positions.
For him his positions on sex, pedophilia, rape, cannot be resolved, he will not allow it, because to do so he would have to change his belief that love is non-aggressive, unselfish, benevolent, and that all deserve it.

A simple adjustment that can explain why sex with a child is despicable; why rape is so abhorrent to a female; why indiscriminate copulation, for the sake of pleasure, is degrading; why the two sexes display such distinct psychological approaches to intercourse; why homosexuality is so demeaning to a male, would all be clarified if they had the courage to abandon their convenient, comforting, delusions, and accept life as it is.

Think, for a moment, how much can be explained if we dare to accept copulation as an act of aggression.
How much of the old god would remain to seduce us?

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:07 pm

Over time a man is glad the common man does not fully understand.
He can only hope to reach the rare few, and not be bothered with the rest.

Such is natural selection.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Tue Mar 14, 2017 7:51 am

History is a series of events managing excess.
Man creates the conditions that will free him from daily natural burdens, producing excessive energies in himself.
Progress has been a gradual sharing of these conditions, making excess a volatile social force that had to be controlled, and cultivated so that from destructive it could be creative and useful to the many.
A cell is a life form that has been assimilated into a bigger organic structure.
If it abides by the shares rules it participates in the creation of something bigger, but if it goes wild, breaking away from the shared project, it become cancerous.
Morality has been a way to indoctrinate and assimilate the human cell into a bigger organization, in relation to environment.
Independence had to be stripped down to its basic functionality, and the individual integrated into increasingly more complex super structures.
As a compensation for this loss the individual gained excess energies to direct towards its personal pleasures, to squander away, to numb or discharge harmlessly.

The SuperOrganism is evolving, using organic mutations to flourish if they do not harm it, just as the organism evolved when on a cellular level it slightly alters functionality.
Each mutation being judged by its contribution to fitness, and how it adds to its competitiveness with other organisms, within a shared environment.

We are currently going through a transformation that will add to the synergy of the superorganic whole.
Gender, race are too disruptive to be permitted, too divisive.
Human cells will be stripped down to their basic functionality before they are integrated into a system identified by their utility, their work, increasing synergy.
Genetic mutations permitted to emerge, unmolested by the demands of natural selection, but cultivated, socially selected, into specialized roles, just as the cell has been.
Self-consciousness is another evolved factor to be reworked and integrated.
Sense of self first directed towards an expansion, an association with otherness, and then shrunk down to a functional identifier.
Moderns expand their sense of self to include the abstract other, the idea God, now converted to the concept of humanity, striped of its reproductive, species identifiers, and then imploded into a clique, a specialized identity, as a subservient specialized role under the grand scheme of Humanity.
The individual need not understand the concept God, or Humanity as anything more than a vague idea, a unifying whole, that an mean anything to anyone. It is then given a unique identifier, within this ambiguity: a functionality, displayed in mode of dress, specialized lingo, attitude relative to other humans.
A cell in the human body has no contact with the outside world, unless this is part of its function, such as a skin cell.
It's entire 'world' is relative to other cells within a superstructure it need not know or understand, but only discipline itself to.
Morality is the awareness and encoding of this process of stripping away and integrating.
On a cellular level it is reflected in a specialized cells functionality. On a tribal of social level it is reflected in the individuals self-repression to facilitate its coexistence and cooperation with others of its kind.
Having evolved some independence an organism had to evolve behaviors that would help it function in relation to other independent organisms.
Heterosexual reproduction was the first step towards cooperative strategies necessitating an adjustment of self to other.
Mating rituals, in all species, is an exhibition of this adjustment. The individual does not only display his worthiness, because it is usually the male that must prove it, but also his harmlessness, his willingness to abide by the rules of conduct, his readiness to restrain self to a degree that will facilitate the reproductive process.
An example of selfish altruism, because the concept of selflessness is another myth that facilitates integration and assimilation into a common rule.
A potential male displays control over himself, when he goes through ritual displays. His commitment to the shared project, his self-restraint in a very invasive, to the female, process.
Human flirting adds the cognitive level to the display: male exhibiting his cognitive flexibility, his creativity, his balanced personality, but most of all his composure, for the female to evaluate before she places herself in a vulnerable position before him - her openness tolerance, offered after he has proven that he is worthy of her risks and the subsequent costs she will take on.
Morality as a display of self-restraint, not self-nullification, to a common endeavour - evidence of commitment and self-control.

Currently reproduction has decreased in importance.
Sheltering has produced excess that has to be managed and cultivated.
Morality shifts into a less biologically discriminating role, and an increasingly social selection one.
Openness to all potentially useful mutations.
The definition of fitness adapts to manmade environments.
The individual human organism is stippled of all his/her genetic identifiers, and discriminating concepts, and trained, educated, integrated into a SuperOrganic functionality. He/She given a new identity, or a new standard of self-identifying, in relation to others.
Popularity, measured in quantities of relationships, wealth, etc, indicates social fitness.
Morality adjust to accommodate this.
Flirting, displays of worthiness, become social conventions dictating how one greets others, how one comports himself within different situations involving others - etiquette.
The individual displays his willingness to repress self, to control the aspects of self that may disrupt a shared goal, a common endeavour, evaluated/appreciated by his potential peers, the group he wishes to integrate into as a specialized member.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Fri Mar 17, 2017 6:43 am

Orbital Configurations
A man unhappy with his lot in life places others at the center of his discontent and himself as an unwitting participant, being pulled into circumstances he may, or may not add his approval to.
For him repulsion is the dominant force.
A man happy with his lot in life places himself at the center of his contentment and other as the unwitting participants, being pulled into circumstances they may, or may not add their approval to.
For him attraction is the dominant force.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Fri Mar 17, 2017 5:55 pm

Fear or Pity?
For the egotist, unable to perform on a level that will inflate his ego beyond a certain level, it is preferable to be considered a hypocrite and a thief than to be exposed as being no more than a common fool and ignoramus.
The old Greek adage hold;
It is better to be feared than to be pitied”.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Fri Mar 17, 2017 11:01 pm

Crippling Convictions
When a cripple is denied his crutches, he would rather lie down, refusing to move, than risk walking on his own, or suffering the indignity of crawling on his hands and knees.
This is evident in moderns when they refuse to define the words they use; refusing to make sense of the concepts supporting their convictions.
Choosing, instead, to sit there silently, cynically imagining themselves making sense.
Their condition declines – progressing from crutches, demanding that all use them, even if able bodied, to an idealized catatonic state, demanding that all become sleepwalkers, even those who are lucid.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Fri Mar 17, 2017 11:20 pm

Quality of Judgment
Value relates to ideal, as subjective relates to the real.
There can be no value with no subjective judgment, as there can be no idealism with no real world.

Judgment is the appreciation of the ideal, in relation to the real, or within the world.
It determines orientation and the path chosen.
Consequences, follow this choice and are the costs/benefits exposing the judgment's quality.
Consequence is the outcome of the application of a judgment. If survived it forces an adjustment, unless it is protected from its own errors, in which case the costs are postponed, until they accumulate into an unavoidable reckoning.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Sat Mar 18, 2017 2:00 pm

Alfred, Jay wrote:
Unconscious Intuitive
Thinking Conscious Analytical Thinking

Fast and effortless
Slow and effortful .
Process is unintentional and
is automatically cued .This
evidences an absence of personal
‘will .’
Process is intentional and is
consciously controlled — an exercise
of ‘free will .’
Process is generally inaccessible,
only results show up consciously .
entire process can be controlled and
viewed in consciousness .
Pattern matching, thought is
metaphorical, holistic .
Symbol manipulation, thought is
truth preserving, analytical .
Common to all mammals .
Unique to humans over age 2 and
perhaps some language-trained apes .
Context dependent .
Context independent .
Platform dependent — i .e .
inclusive to the brain and body
that houses it .
Platform independent — processes
can be transmitted to other rule
following organisms or machines .
In other words, experiences can be
easily communicated to others .The
information is ‘portable .’

Brains and Realities

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Sat Mar 18, 2017 3:14 pm

Modernity uses the herd mind to attempt to enforce some level of group think.
It shames and ostracizes, presenting the spectre of peer pressuring hatred as a threat, forcing the individual into a choice.
Does it cope with being hated by the majority of others, managing ridicule, slander, and social stigma, or can it live with the loss of integrity and the shame of being forced into hiding?
The dilemma is also based no herd psychology because even in hiding the shame is associated with the judgment of others.

Does a hunter feel ashamed because he chooses to smother himself in the prey's urine, or wear its skins?
No, he isn't, because he can wash and take off the skins of imitation he has covered himself with, and because his identity has nothing to do with the herd he depends upon for his life-hood, and their judgments are only event to his well-being because they indicate the direction the herd will go to find food to graze on, or what waterhole it will choose to drink from.

This is the only reason a hunter gauges the herd's general psychology, and its intentions.
Other than this he has no interest in their communications and judgments.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Mon Mar 20, 2017 11:49 am

Memory is where past/present/future unite into a whole.
The concept of a unified whole only exists in the mind of a living organism, and has no meaning outside of it.
Outside the conscious mind there is only process, or patterned and non-patterned dynamic processes (inter)acting.
Order describes a process that repeats, and the rhythms and frequency determines how it will be interpreted by a conscious mind; the pattern's consistency, is its essence, and what we categorize as elements, particles, quanta, or types of matter/energy.
only ordered patterns are measurable, or can be perceived.
Of course this randomness and its imperceptibility depends on the duration and frequency of its periodic consistency, in relation to the observing mind's perceptual acuity and speed of processing - metabolic rates: systolic/diastolic cellular rhythms.    
Chaos describes processes that lack all rhythmic and frequency consistency.

Only if a process is ordered can it be perceived and stored as memory - making it a subject for study.
Only what can be stored and studied can be useful, or measured and given a value.
Value refers to this utility, or it refers to the repeating process', the pattern's rhythm in relation to the observing organisms processing speeds determining the base value of its measuring standard.
 
Whole refers to this memory, contained in the brain in the form of abstractions, as a singular unity, with a beginning and an end.

Pattern refers to such a beginning and end, repeating - a cyclical process: rhythm.
Without memory we cannot speak of wholes, but only refer to processes that either repeat or do not.
The error we make is to assume that the discovery of patterns repeating themselves for a duration equal to human memory, which would also include historical, documented memory, along with anecdotal, or personal memory, indicate patterns that will continue indefinitely - eternally.
When we do so we create a unity we call universe, within which we include patterns we assume will continue in space/time with a foreseeable final end, or with no end.
Eternity refers to this endless repetition of patterns held in memory.

Humanism rooted in the belief in a absolute beginning and end, meaning a start and finish to memory, placed in the mind of a theoretical mind - god - changes to a secular belief in memory continuing indefinitely, in the minds of humanity, making cosmos into another term for humanity.
Man makes of himself the preserver of cosmic memory - creator of a unified cosmos, i.e. universe, and since memory can only be stored in the form of code, or symbols (words/numbers), all begins and ends with the word: all is measurable, comprehensible when it can be given a symbol.
The counter-intuitive is ambiguously intuited, therefore it is given order, and unified, within the human brain.
Human is the new name of God, the creator of order, and unities, and the preserver of memories - survival.

Uni-verse begins when human memory, oral and then written begins - historical time is for humans the whole they call uni-verse.
This historical time/space is expanded forward, into the yet to be, and backward, towards the absolute point of departure, absorbing space/time into a historical singularity held together, as a whole, in human memory, which, now, ceases to be experienced memory first or second-hand, and is imagined, extrapolated.
When this occurs it becomes subject to human corruption - emotion, whimsy, desire, the erotic/thymotic elements in human nature; the attraction/repulsion of interactivity now directed by the human will, within each finding a different motive - movement towards an ideal.

Memories can now be manufactured, combined in whatever way pleases the organism, or gives hope to the attainment of his desired objective.
Memories with no reference to anything experienced, outside historical time, lacking precedent, void of the apparent, of presence.
In dreams memories lack all cohesion - time/space do not impose order, everything is easily manipulated by the human will, directed by what is, most of the time, mysterious even to itself.
Primal cellular imperatives emerge to direct, to take control, and consciousness is left to observe, surprised by is presented to it, as if it were coming from some external source, from an alien will.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Mon Mar 20, 2017 6:53 pm

Natural selection teaches us not only how the quality of a subjective interpretation of the objective world is resolved, with no theoretical debate, on the basis of costs & benefits, and it also resolved, with no words required, the issue of competing genes and memes.
In the latter case, when and if no human intervention skews the costs and the benefits with a motive outside the competing participants.
The only way any debate remains relevant, in a conveniently vague and theoretical level, is when an external power intervenes to equalize the benefits or to decrease the costs, selectively.

This is how sheltering from natural culling sickens a population by permitting unfit mutations to propagate, unburdened by the price of their errors, and the poor judgments that produced them, or by creating the illusion that all judgments are equal, because these is no severe cost to any inferior subjective interpretation of the objective reality.

Not surprising that moderns refuse to define the words they use.
If they did it would expose how delusional, hypocritical, ignorant, and emotional their ideals are.
To hide their "ought", and to pretend they are not lying, they have to slander all theories so as to protect their own from being exposed as being inferior.

Their ideals are as vague as the enemies they strawman and burn, imagining themselves great victors and righteous crusaders of good against evil.

Christians laymen did not really have to understand what Satan, within their own dogma,m represented, because then it would pull them into thinking connected to Prometheus, as the great benefactor, or the pentagram symbolizing the five natural elements, in paganism, or the goat, the male goat sacrifice, refers to tragedy, and the yearly cleansing of the city of bad omens, and so on and so forth.
Much easier for the simpleton Christian to vaguely understand Satan as some kind of evil that opposes a loving, one, God, who lies, where his God cannot but speak the truth, because his word IS truth.
Simpletons, throughout time, had to be given a bogeyman, something to fear, and hate; something to keep them disciplined, and comfortable.
Marxists had their evil capitalist pigs that exploited the poor working man.
Anarchists had their vile authoritarian government, a representation of a despised father figure, to replace their shame with pride.

Even simpleton pagans were given these anthropomorphic deities, spirits, to cope with the unpredictability of bad events, and the injustices of genetics.

Simpletons require simple either/or answers to cope with a world that terrifies them.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Tue Mar 21, 2017 6:48 am

Rationalizing Visceral Judgments
Affirming and negating usually follow a judgment already passed, on an unconscious genetic level.
Then the mind must justify it within the present, within a memetic context.
If the expression of choice is denied memetically, the individual will find alternate methods of harmonizing this denial with his own genetic judgment.
The genetic ideal failing to be in agreement with a memetic one will fabricate ways to make them coincide.
Blurring the cognitive outlines, is the preferred way.
Contradiction ignored under a heavy screen of misty reasoning.
A women denied the right to say 'no', to express her natural sexual power, will fabricate a method of rejection that remains true to her genetic judgments within the limits of her memetic environment.
She may become more demanding, difficult, expecting the man to pass increasingly severe tests ensuring his failure, or the postponement of her submission; triggering frustration as a way of making the other reject her, as an extension of her already made negative judgment of him.
Culpability escaped when the other is made the agency through which her sexual choice is expressed.
A modern unable to defend his denial of race will postpone judgment, demand more evidence, will raise the level of overcoming his doubt to a point where it will never be surpassed.
Frustrating the threat he cannot defeat, hoping he'll make it give up and leave him alone; safe from race, or any part of nature, the real, that threatens his peace of mind.
Maintaining his self-identity as an 'open rational mind' he will take advantage of any opportunity to affirm his memetic ideal, by making it so difficult to convince him that failure is inevitable, on the part of the one who tries.
With every failure his own denial of race is affirmed, without him having to justify his own positions.
A humanist, desperate to abide by his memetic identity, will justify his discrimination, rationalizing his intuitive judgments in a way that harmonizes his genetic disposition with his memetic circumstances.
He will seek to protect his identity as a humanist, by finding reasons to express his visceral judgments indirectly.
Preserving his memetic identity of a humanist he will find justifications, excuses, and indirect passive-aggressive methods of expressing his inhumanity.

Conversely, if a genetic judgment is positive, affirmative, then both woman, humanist, and modern will go out of their way to excuse any flaws, ignoring any issue that contradicts their genetically established value judgment.
Stringent, demanding, reasoning become softer, yielding. They bend to lower the level needed to surpass them.
Skepticism is washed away, with a variety of justifications; postponement of judgment is replaced by an easy immediacy that just happens unintentionally.

Intuition uses reason to validate itself.
Visceral judgments, in the form of vague feelings, sensations, the body speaking to the mind, are focused by the mind, as light is focused by a lens.
This is top<>down thinking placing at the top of the pyramid; a choice already made on an unconscious, non-cognitive level then demanding to be justified, rationalized, validated.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:14 am

Philosophy – Construction Project
Philosophy begins, like all serious construction projects, with a thorough surveying of the landscape.
It studies the environment it will begin building within. The environment directs the builder on what type of structure can be built there, and how to make it harmonize with the landscape. If the builder is aesthetically challenged, or chooses the landscape then his structure will contradict the environment, as something that pollutes or diminishes its beauty.  
A serious, aesthetically aware builder wants his structure to fit-into the environment, adding to its beauty; accentuating it, and bringing it forth, through his own utilitarian interventions upon it.
Then he begins digging into the ground to place a foundation.
This foundation is Metaphysics.
Once the foundation is laid down the structure can begin to be built, guided by the foundations. If the structure does not abide by the directions and dimensions of the foundations the structure will be crooked. Either the foundations have to be adjusted, or the builder must adapt his structure to the foundations he painstakingly laid into the earth he dug up.
The structure is the physical, dealing with the world, the real.
When both foundation and structure have progressed to the point where the builder can reside in his structure he may choose to decorate the structure with details, or go on trips, returning to the structure after every outing, or he may choose to hold parties in the structure.
Whatever he chooses to do we have now entered the context of what one should do with the structure – its utility.
A talented builder implies utility with the architecture and the structure’s arrangement and decorations, built in alignment on a strong durable foundation, in harmony with the environment.
Philosophers begin either with a structure, or, the more thoughtful ones, with a foundation, but they never begin with an “ought”, a utility.
Religions do this, particularly the nihilistic ones. They begin with an “ought”, an ideal lifestyle, and then they manufacture a structure around this “ought”– sometimes not bothering to dig into the ground to construct a foundation.
This is top<>down thinking, characteristic of all nihilistic artifices.  
Their structure, lacking a foundation, or built in misalignment with a flimsy structure directed by their ideal lifestyle, what kind of life they dream of living, will crumble with the first high wind, or earth tremor.  
Abrahamism, and Marxism begin with the utility and then manufacture a structure, before digging a shallow foundation.
Then they have to patch replacements for each piece ripped down by the environmental conditions. What matters to them is the “ought” – the ideal lifestyle they dreamt off, and built a structure to accommodate.
They are proud of the number of people that visit, ignoring the patchwork aesthetics, of their ongoing project – repairs adding over repairs, calling it a work in progress, or progressive.  
Serious philosophy is about the structure (physics) and the foundation (metaphysics) being in agreement, in harmony, and usually does not bother with utility, with any should, or “ought”, because each individual who will take residence in the structure can give his own utility to it.  

Taking this outside the context of the metaphor, we can repeat the same concepts as such:
Philosophy describes world, as it is, the physical world, and aligns it, if it strives for integrity, with a metaphysical foundation.
It does not necessarily give direction as to how to use the descriptions, although many great philosophers do, or insinuate such applications indirectly.
Application is, for a philosopher, a secondary issue, not his primary concern, because application is dependent on the particular traits and ideals of the individual. It is the individual who must adjust himself to the description, in accordance to his strengths and weaknesses, and his own goals.  
Utility is the realm of religion and politics, and it only follows the description.
The description does not follow the utility, as it does for Nihilists, or Moderns.

Life emerges out of world, not world out of life – the subjective emerges from the objective real, not the objective real from subjective consciousness.

This is why I have remained on describing world, and constructing a foundation to support my observations, and rarely direct others to specific application of my description.
I do so, somewhat, in some places, like Timocracy, or I imply utility without going into details.
I know that world can only be dealt with individually, and only the individual himself can know himself, or can create his own goals, within a shared world.

I, for example, describe what beauty, or love, or humanity, is....I don't tell people what to do about it.
I am not a father, or guide, or shaman, or guru, nor do I aspire to be a priest, or a leader, of any kind.
Let those with such ambitions direct and offer guidance.
I describe....as I would any natural environment.
If I were to describe a jungle, and the many creatures living in it, I would not tell anyone what to do about it, or what direction they should take in the jungle, or how to deal with specific life forms, within it.
Weaklings want more than descriptions. When they read philosophy they are looking for a religious experience, or a political manifesto.
Most do not understand the description, so they simply want to be told what to do about what they do not comprehend.
They do not even apprehend the insinuations, the subtle guidance slipping through the writer's description. They want clear, commandments written on stone, or a little red book to put in their breast-pocket and refer to on every occasion of stress.
How else would Abrahamism and Marxism be so popular?
They don't really care about world, of philosophy, but only want to be told, given a destination and a route to get there. They want to be taken by the hand, by a parental figure, and taken somewhere fun and safe, and great.
They want someone else to build the structure, dig up the foundations and then, also, be told what to do with it.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Thu Mar 23, 2017 7:22 pm

Agreement/Disagreement
Just as a paradox is the consequence of taking the symbol (word/number) literally, rather than figuratively, exposing a conflict between noumenon and the phenomenon it interprets, and represents, so is an error the consequence of a contradiction between the subjective interpretation of reality, and the dynamic fluctuating inter-activities of reality itself.
If we use the word 'objective' to refer to the goal of approaching perfect alignment, then an error indicates a misalignment. The size of the error indicating the size of the misalignment, between ideal and real.
Cost is the consequence of this disagreement, just as benefit is the consequence of agreement.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Fri Mar 24, 2017 9:35 pm

Be aware of who you call your friend, or to who you give direction.
The eye feasts before the mouth, and association is judged before intention.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Sat Mar 25, 2017 7:31 am

Wheels & Ball Bearings
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
We use the invention of the wheel as a milestone in human advancement.
Walking, with its step by step, causality, replaced by the continuity, of linear flow.
The wheel became a symbol of existence in many spiritual and philosophical canons. Man’s thinking reflecting this advancement.
The ball bearing is the development of the wheel concept. Another milestone in human innovation. A cognitive advancement from the fourth to fifth level:
Levels of Cognition wrote:
This is the First Level of Cognition, corresponding to Psychology's First Level of Intentionality:
Consciousness – Subjectivity of the First Order (Primitive Organism).
A Line

Then, from this, the organism imagines (projects) himself on that point, and perceives itself perceiving.
The organism has made of itself a noetic point in space time.
This is the Second Level of Cognition, corresponding to Psychology's Second Level of Intentionality: Self-Consciousness – Subjectivity of the Second Order (Higher Organisms).
A Triangle

Then, the organism begins to imagine itself imagining itself imagine, a third party triangulating upon a point in space/time.
The two triangles side by side form a square, or a rectangle.
This is the Third Level of Cognition, corresponding to Psychology's Third Level of Intentionality: Objectivity of the First Order (Advanced Organism).
A Square

Then, the organism begins to imagine itself imagining itself imagine a third party triangulating upon a point in space/time, where all, including its own triangulation are part of a whole.
It has projected itself outside all triangulations.
The organism can only perceive outwards but now it imagines itself outside itself, in the Third Cognitive Level, and also behind itself, and beside itself (around itself), creating a noetic circle encircling a noetic point encompassing all this triangles.
This is the Fourth Level of Cognition, corresponding to Psychology's Fourth Level of Intentionality: Subjectivity of the Third Order (Sophisticated Organism).
A Circle

Then, the organism begins to imagine itself imagining itself imagine a third party triangulating upon a point in space/time, where all, including its own triangulation are part of a whole, and it is above, looking down – it is twice removed.
It has projected itself outside all triangulations, and above this outside.
The organism can only perceive outwards but now it imagines itself outside itself, in the Third Cognitive Level, and also behind itself, and beside itself (around itself), creating a noetic circle encircling a noetic point encompassing all this triangles.
This is the Fifth Level of Cognition, corresponding to Psychology's Fifth Level of Intentionality: Objectivity of the First Order (Hyper-Cognitive Organism).
A Cube/Prism/Sphere

This is where the conception of a whole takes place.
Then, the organism begins to imagine itself imagining itself imagine a third party triangulating upon a point in space/time, where all, including its own triangulation are part of a whole, and it is above, looking down – it is twice removed – but it is also perceiving itself looking down – it is thrice removed.
It has projected itself outside all triangulations, and above, and outside, this outside.
The organism can only perceive outwards but now it imagines itself outside itself, in the Third Cognitive Level, and also behind itself, and beside itself (around itself), creating a noetic circle encircling a noetic point encompassing all this triangles, and it is detached from it all.
This is the Sixth Level of Cognition, corresponding to Psychology's Sixth Level of Intentionality: Objectivity of the Second Order (hyper-Sophisticated Organism).
Fluid Space/Time – Thinking outside the confines of Geometric Shapes

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Sun Mar 26, 2017 1:42 pm

If you offer a theory describing how species evolve, including the presence of human races, as you would include the presence of types within a another species, all in accordance with Evolution Theory, you will receive angry assaults, or casual dismissive cynical ridicule claiming that a process that occurs independent from how minds interpret it, is, somehow dependent on how each individual interprets it.
Something that occurs outside the mind, and does so even if there is no mind present to interpret it, is now reduced to a human concept that is dependent no how each individual chooses to understand it.

Same thing happens when you offer a theory about another 'triggering topic' like homosexuality, or morality.
You can place it within Evolution Theory, using evidence or reason, and the other will casually dismiss it on emotional grounds, offering nothing but the denial - no alternative, no more rational theory to explain the same phenomena....just a refusal, accompanied with cynicism, and word-games, claiming it's all subjective, or there's not enough evidence to make any conclusions, or simply rejecting your theory because someone is hurt by it, or they do not like it.
They have no alternative, because it would expose their quality of mind, and their motives, an their lies, but only attempt to slander you and your theory, using subjective criteria....to hide this they accuse you of what they are guilty of: emotional motives, like hatred, or of trying to impose your subjective viewpoint on others, within nothing but your likes and dislikes backing them up.

This is hypocrisy and cowardice, at its best.
This is nihilism: Liberalism, Marxism, Arahamism.
This is the last-man, the Modern.
But not the last wo-man - feminization.

So, how do Moderns explain speciation with no intermediate process manifesting as sub-categories that, over time, split into completely different species?
They don't.
They only critique and try to silence the ideas that threaten their comfort zones.
they only try to promote the feel-good hypothesis that Evolution works in any way feels good, to each individual, and that it adapts to the subjective demands of each and every human.
There is no beauty, as preexisting the eye that beholds, because this would make the ones feeling insecure about their own aesthetic appeal, and fitness, feel threatened and exposed.
They will not define beauty, because they cannot, or will not without appearing foolish, and desperate, but they will also refuse any definition that threatens them, offering no reasons other than the concept that beauty is dependent on the mind perceiving - not that the mind evolved to perceive what we call beauty, and to appreciate it, as part of is own survival, but that it manufactures it, out of thin air, and that beauty is whatever each human, individual, excluding all other species, decides that it is.


Like Christians reduced love to a meaningless concept, because all deserve it, so do they attempt to reduce all words that make them feel bad to a meaningless concept.
Instead of placing it within reality, in the world, they want it to be about a particular instance, a specific individual.
Though, some claim to be reasonable, empiricist, and devoted to the scientific method, they imply that nothing general can be said about populations, like species, like groups, because they are made of individuals that fall under no category.
a specific science, and philosophy, has to be written for each and every individual human ever born, or will ever be born.

But then how does marketing, psychology and politics work, if this were the case?
They would be ineffective because they, like all the sciences, build models using samples, that apply to all members in a particular category, and do not create one for each individual.

How could we speak of humanity, if we think this is so?
How could we think of any category, in any field, if we accept this as a fact?
If human is not a species designation, then what is it? Is it an idea?
Is it an organism that can vote, or that can use words, or that can manufacture clothes, and symbols, to cover its primate body with?
Covering the genitals has served to conceal the true "civility" of man, throughout the ages.
Has language extricated man for nature, erasing his entire past?
Is human conditioning, training, education, his avenue out of his own nature - does it erase centuries of nurturing, with a few years of nurturing, or does it repress and hide it beneath hypocrisy?

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Sun Mar 26, 2017 3:50 pm

Fool's Revelation
As much reason, logic, eloquence, intellectual acumen, a fool brings to bear when he desperately wants to dismiss what threatens him, when he cynically denounced what another believes, is exposed as an imitated reaction pretending to be the equal of what it cannot match, when he dares to openly share what he believes.
At that fatal moment to his contrived image he exposes the depth of his true essence, hiding behind copied defences.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:57 am


In Jungian cryto-Christian archetypes, the jester, the fool, is a precursor to the saviour.
Who are the only ones who dare speak their mind in Modern hypersensitive, feminized, dominated by Nihilistic ideals/memes, times?
The professional comedian, and he is only permitted to do so indirectly, by self-degrading, expressing his opinions, that nobody dares utter, in a self-deprecating, cynical, delivery, which is permitted.
What stress is accumulated to maintain the social image, to repress personae and cultivate character, the caricature, is released in a welcomed orgiastic, release of stress = laughter.
Self knowledge is unburdened by laughing at a representation we can project the shameful parts of self. Parts that come in conflict with the prevailing ideals - gene/meme conflict, accentuated when the meme is so contrary to the gene, as with all Nihilistic ideals, that a continuous release of stress is essential to remain in control of the pretentious performance.

Have you seen interviews with provocative comedians, claiming that their controversial jokes are not what they believe in, personally, but only meant to expose the ridiculousness of concepts like sexual and racial differences?
They do not offer an argument, or an explanation as to how race is a product of social engineering and bigotry, but they only ridicule what cannot be contradicted in each and every thinking mind.
Do thy offer a alternative scenario to how species evolve, to replace the "bigoted" one that implies gradual a gradual split, due to genetic isolation, over time, creating intermediate stages of divergent potentials, exhibited in appearance?
No.
Do they offer a reason why appearances do not matter only when it comes to the human species?
No.

They simply slander and attack the sources, ridiculing what they cannot reason against, trying to silence the questions emerging in thinking minds that cannot simply ignore genetics because this meme tells them they are superficial, and cannot justify a selective, convenient , cynical dismissal, placing integrity above comfort.
How do they do this?
They tap into these thoughts in themselves and expose them as a target to attack and laugh at.
They make of themselves the memetic scapegoat, to be sacrificed in the name of community peace and shared welfare.
They make themselves the effigy of doubt and reason, to be burned with the flames of pathos.

Laughter imitates orgasm with its spasmodic, convulsions of the diaphragm.
Internal tensions holding back secret dispositions, to remain true to the modern ideal, accumulate until they express themselves in psychosis, or sexual dysfunction and fantasy...or are released in harmless atmospheric gesticulations, in a communal show of solidarity.
What do the masses laugh at?
At what they cannot rid themselves of, in private.
they need the community to spur them on, to give them the okay...and they need a jester to laugh at themselves.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:15 am

The jester, the fool, the clown, is tolerated by the king, because he provides this service to his kingdom, ensuring his reign will continue by releasing repressed disgruntled intuitive forces.

The jester is also the harbinger, the apostle, of the one, the messiah, to come.
He prepares the ground by habituating that masses to the ridiculous, slowly reducing resistance to its coming.
When the Messiah comes his absurd claims will no longer be laughed at; he will be taken seriously by a population prepared by the jester's absurdities.
The town clown prepares the spirit of the town citizens by exposing them to the coming message.
What resistance is present, is slowly degraded, ridiculed, until shame is associated with its thought.
Like training animals - you expose them to a stimuli and accompany it with a positive feeling, until the two become united in the inferior mind.
Laughter at the clowns antics, associates the images and words with a feeling of relief, so that when the messiah comes to repeat them they trigger the same relief, joy.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Mon Mar 27, 2017 11:34 am

Temporal attrition - the ongoing repulsion/attraction of a unity, relating to fluctuating interactivity, does not stop.
It is ceaseless - agon.

When it decreases to a tolerable level, it drops out of consciousness.
The organism is relieved by this, and another need takes its place, demanding a similar relief.
Need is the rising of the consequences of attrition to a level where the organism becomes aware of it. Then, if sufficiently dealt with, it decreases, dropping out of consciousnesses.

Need does not end, it rises in and out of consciousness depending on its degree, relative to the organism's strength: the sum total of its aggregate energies.
To become stronger is to raise the level need must surpass before it becomes problematic to the organism.
There are two ways to accomplish this:
1- Habituation. The organism becoming used to a level of need to the point where it can ignore it.
This is not a solution, because need left unsatisfied rises, until it goes above the organism's comfort level - whether this comfort level is natural, part of its genetic tolerance to pain/suffering, or it is cultivated with ascetic practices.
2- Strengthening. The increase of the organisms's aggregate energies so that the degree of attrition required to produce a level of need increases, making all levels beneath it tolerable levels - comfortable.

Pleasure is the sensation of alleviating need/suffering.
Gradual or immediate, the sensation is one of relief - the latter being felt as orgasmic, ecstasy.
The potential for a immediate or a gradual relief is determined by the nature of the need - if it is primary, a product of lack, or secondary, the byproduct of lack, or superfluity, abundance, requiring expulsion.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:07 pm

It is that which most passionately pronounces itself as the new truth, which has the most ancient lies to hide.
What it hides is an old belief, that has been shamed into hiding; an old hypocrisy that has been discovered.
The degree of passion in the declaration of newness, reveals the degree of shame, in the old, being returned as something different.

Give it time and it will expose itself, when it is sure it has been successful with its covering, or when it is confident that it has the perfect excuse.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:53 am

How ironic, how perfectly duplicitous, to express self-denial through exaggerated selfishness, self-hatred, through exaggerated displays of self-love, and to explain anything that contradicts the pretense for what you fear is directing your own words.

How ironic that in environments where this method is the norm, the one who speaks honestly and truly loves himself, would be perceived as hating.

Perhaps not ironic....but to be expected when Nihilism is about inversions.

The infantile mind declares itself mature.
The retarded mind declares itself genius.
The world hating mind declares itself world embracing.
The hater of self declaring himself a lover of himself.

Hoping another mind will believe it, and by believing it contributing some certainty to its uncertainty.

Desperate to make philosophy a measure of happiness, proving that even the lowly animal is philosophical in its obliviousness.
Gratifying your needs, achieving pleasure, the highest virtue, animals and manimals alike, can share in.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Satyrnalium

Back to top Go down
 
Satyrnalium
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 11 of 14Go to page : Previous  1 ... 7 ... 10, 11, 12, 13, 14  Next
 Similar topics
-
» Satyrnalium

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: