Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalFAQMemberlistSearchRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 Gutmenschen, Modern Misinterpretations and Online Encounters

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3
AuthorMessage
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1402
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: Gutmenschen, Modern Misinterpretations and Online Encounters Wed Oct 12, 2016 2:55 am

A rant, I wanted to share here:

LIBERTY PRIME 9:16 PM

The reason for me not being racist is not because I have white guilt. It is because I know what's right and wrong. We are human. We used to with sticks and dirt, and now we can create masterpieces. I believe the same thing happens with accepting people for who they are. We have grown not as whites, but as humans, so you can cut the shit.
Show less

Slaughtz 10:52 PM

+LIBERTY PRIME Very cute. Is war, necessity, not the mother of invention? Did not technology advance very fast due to it? And what, exactly, caused those wars? Was it peace loving and being 'humanist'? How about 'sharing'?

No, it was ethnicities, especially in Europe, that warred the fuck out of each other. German vs Anglo, Russia vs. Europe, bloody political revolutions etc. etc.

Amazing, '''racist''' tribalism is actually responsible for wars and wars are responsible for technological advancement?

Maybe you mean 'social progress'... Yeah, you go ahead and attend your anti-patriarchy, anti-white rallies and complain about 'muh gender pronouns'. Into the trash, you go.

Technology, in fact, is the only reason you're even considering your completely naive position. If not for the technology built by necessity, by competition, you'd be worrying about bandits stealing your shit and keeping a close community of trusted compatriots.

I'm not hateful of anything but ignorance and naivety, parading itself as virtue. People who have no respect for the origins of their 'advancement' or 'progress'. People paid, in blood. People overcame. Adapted. Strived. The pay off/bountifulness of that is what the vultures from other continents, non-Europeans, come to feed off of. Then, tell the sons and daughters of the people who dealt with that shit, to stop taking pride in their forefathers.

The idiot, or ungrateful, entitled and hateful piece of shit, is you and all your '''Social Justice''' ilk.

The highest expression of a love of life requires a willingness to die - which your egalitarian kind is anathema to. You will be forced to live in a world without any semblance of honor, subject to charlatans, corruption and squalor. You've declared war on all heroism and decency.

Now, go away.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
OhFortunae

avatar

Gender : Male Scorpio Posts : 2479
Join date : 2013-10-26
Age : 24
Location : Land of Dance and Song

PostSubject: Re: Gutmenschen, Modern Misinterpretations and Online Encounters Wed Oct 12, 2016 12:15 pm

He already deleted his comment, lol

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
View user profile https://plus.google.com/u/0/109705167311303906720/posts
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1402
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: Gutmenschen, Modern Misinterpretations and Online Encounters Fri Dec 16, 2016 9:14 pm

Satyr wrote:
Why feel shame when you can buy respect, or, at least, have some fake it?

What else can be bought?
Love, friendship, genius?

When words no longer matter, they can be thrown about to cause an impact, to build an image.
Enough money will buy you yes-sayers, worshiping the round you walk upon.
Quote :
StevieGG08 2:07 AM wrote:

Only a democratic republic with a free market economy can coexist with meritocracy. White people and asians just happen to be better than other ethnic groups because the european and asian cultures have dominated for a long long time.

Slaughtz 2:44 AM wrote:
Jesus. What is the standard for 'intelligence' but an IQ test? What is the standard for 'qualification' but experience and ability?

"Democratic republic with a free market economy can coexist with meritocracy." What a mouthful. Is that what your goal is? Do you even know what a society like that would look like? Tell me how it differs from the aim of a 'multi-cultural' and 'egalitarian' society, Homo-Economicus.

If a man pays you exorbitantly to completely abandon your child that you've raised for 10 years, throwing him into ruin where he otherwise would've had a good chance at being prosperous, is that child 'deserving' of the wreckage of a life he received? After all, you can now have many more children, but you're forbidden from helping your first child, as part of the agreement.

If you're not a Jew, you're a major cuck only concerned about power, like a greedy and conniving little rat with no sense of virtue or justice. You've reduced the most aspirant ideals to monetary value. You'd put a price on your own blood.

There's a reason separated blood-related kin get emotional when they find out each other exist. Just because you're unsatisfied, like a whinging little rodent, with what you've inherited, doesn't mean you have a claim to dictating what others should or shouldn't value. Like a triggered snowflake, whinging about nepotism and 'le racism', getting your panties in a bunch out of a deathly fear of tribal behavior, thinking it's 'incompatible' or 'outdated' with your true fedora-tippingly 'intelligent' society. You're a dweeb.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
OhFortunae

avatar

Gender : Male Scorpio Posts : 2479
Join date : 2013-10-26
Age : 24
Location : Land of Dance and Song

PostSubject: Re: Gutmenschen, Modern Misinterpretations and Online Encounters Sat Dec 17, 2016 4:37 am

Nice
Back to top Go down
View user profile https://plus.google.com/u/0/109705167311303906720/posts
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1402
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: Gutmenschen, Modern Misinterpretations and Online Encounters Fri Dec 23, 2016 10:05 am

In response to a cynic who said that "All [...] things ARE meaningless in the face of Entropy and the will of Fate."

I respond: "Fate isn't a will. That's your personification of the world so it remains comprehensible to you. That would be fine, if you only recognized you also have a will and may participate among the Gods."

What an explanation for the misery of the impoverished, Christianity provides: It is because they are sinful to an irredeemable fault that is the reason for their bad inheritance. That is why they may not partake in the glory which the nobility do. The battle-worn and sober knight is an equal to the lowest impoverished drunkard.

When people fear entropy and declare all meaning gone in its face, they forget what they themselves destroy. They shed skin, hair and nails. They separate themselves from their bodies, their will from their nature, or their nature from the world.

If every interaction in this world did not have meaning, then no consciousness behind it would bother maintaining it. What could anyone respond to that except that I am a sinner or taking advantage of this unseen will's grace/kindness.

First they must build, from memory and then spirits, to create a prime God. From the assumption of the prime God, they negate Him and say the world is meaningless. With the negation, they negate spiritedness. They negate memory - the haunting spectre of an empty room wherein a loved one resided only a month ago.

.988 rounded up becomes 1. Negate 1 and you get -1 instead of -.988.
You assume God, then negate God and think it's reality. You cannot negate a unicorn without creating anti-unicorn.
1 to -1
matter to anti-matter
A shadow is not a thing, it is the absence of light. A void is not a thing, it is the absence of things.
Sound and light does not travel "through" something, it is perturbations of that something.
Kant's hand experiment takes place in a human mind utilizing a thinking process duality, binary. Not in the world.
A computer calculates in binary, some calculate in ternary, humans think in nerves and synapses. The world has its own rules.

They created a duality with the death of a person, who will no longer be interacting with them or the world. Frozen as a memory - Hell and Heaven duality emerges because judgment is immediately cast by an unseen deity instead of by the people. With Pagans, the underworld is where people decay and return to Earth. Their image is tortured in hell. Elysium is where people remember you in full, they remember your life like they do tales of Gods. Purgatory is wherein a person lies in wait for their fate to be determined - they published books of untold value only to be discovered later and sent to Elysium - or burnt and forgotten, sent to the underworld.

Connecting the conceptual scheme (synapse structure) with the world outside it, in every meaningful way, is the task of every Philosopher. That is, creating a flexible mental framework out of which one is most optimally responsive to the world.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1402
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: Gutmenschen, Modern Misinterpretations and Online Encounters Wed Apr 12, 2017 4:38 am

Spoiler:
 
Anglo, the resentful bastard race that inherited a mind too big for its heart.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1402
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: Gutmenschen, Modern Misinterpretations and Online Encounters Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:40 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 2247
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 34
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: Gutmenschen, Modern Misinterpretations and Online Encounters Fri Dec 01, 2017 12:15 pm

^ He would have been fine with Christian conspiracy, Capitalist conspiracy, Communist conspiracy, he wouldn't have called it a conspiracy though.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1402
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: Gutmenschen, Modern Misinterpretations and Online Encounters Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:38 am

sha0 @sha0
Feb 3, 2018, 6:54:55 PM keyboard_arrow_left reply thumb_up 1  thumb_down
All of this depends upon the premise that skin-color preferences are innate, which you haven't demonstrated, but merely asserted.
--

Slaughtz @Slaughtz

Feb 4, 2018, 12:34:27 AM reply thumb_up  thumb_down
@sha0 Skin Color preference is not innate, but it is as close to it you can get without it being so. Research suggests that whomever your parents look like, that is what you will be comfortable with. In birds, this is called 'imprinting', and they can 'imprint' on humans. If there is a non-interference by technology on this process of discrimination, another 2000 years and skin color blending together, eventually (at worst, or best in your racially masochistic case) all people will become 'brown'. Effectively, no more whites. However, the complete extinction of whites in 2000 years is a pretty high goal for you to accomplish - especially now that a significant portion of whites are aware that's what you and your political ideology are either indifferent to others attempting to do, or are actively doing so. But, worst case (sorry, it might be best case for you), all are brown. Now, ideological warring can cause groups to segregate geographically and eventually create different skin intonations. But, again, let's grant your ideology of individualism is so great it overcomes even that. Now you have the simple law of dialectical change among differing geographical regions to contend with, creating a new challenge of having to police the world's language. Doesn't sound very 'individualist', but let's grant you somehow you manage to square that circle because "Racism is bad mmkay". Now you've achieved your great individualist paradise where everyone shares the same language, everyone is geographically unbiased and non-invested.. Wait, maybe they'd be invested in their property. Economics. Now you have to conquer that. Not only that, but their preference for their own children over others. This 'individualism' sure did dissolute into something resembling Communism real fast, didn't it? Ah well, you'd be dead by then, anyway. What matters now is that you're living life on the hog - and you've come to tell everyone they can to, if they just utilize language to be selfish and stagnant in thought beyond anything to do with their own personal comfort - provided it doesn't lead them to unsavory things that interfere with your comfort.
--
@Slaughtz:

I agree about "imprinting," but only insofar as it is related to the concept of "conditioning."  It's not restricted to parents.  If your aunt has a different skin-color and treats you amazingly well and your parents are abusive, would you agree that there's a good chance that any skin-color preference based on original "imprinting" might be undone?  If you're a minority skin-color in a city and you never experience racism but only kindness, then goto a city where your own skin-color is the majority and treats you horribly, will your parental imprint have served you well, or will you turn around and go back?

You have mistaken me for someone else.  I don't want all people to become "brown.  Perhaps you're accustomed to discussions with people who do want that, but not this time.  If you are concerned about a skin-color disappearing, persuade men and women of that skin-color to reproduce 3 or more children and then you have population-growth.  An ethno-state might be sufficient to encourage that, but it's not been demonstrated to be necessary.

You have mistaken me for someone who wants white-skinned people to go extinct.  I don't want that.

You have mistaken me for someone who has a political ideology that supports these two positions that you've mistaken me for having.  Please ask, first.

According to the "political compass test," I am one point right of center and four points below center towards "libertarian," for whatever that's worth.

I made a very specific point to the original author and you have completely straw-manned me and accused me of being someone I'm not at all.  I'm open to further discussion if you're open to being more charitable.
--

@sha0 Your question is like asking me if a population (a whole town) somehow loses their legs, "will they give up trying to walk?" Yes, but the initial instinct is present. From the first imprint, you become biased sexually, with all things equal: such as the bizarre world where your examples happen for skin color. It doesn't address the main point of the argument which is that natural behavior to prefer mates that are roughly similar to the ones that parented you. It is the larger trends of behavior in a healthy society which is being pointed to: not dysfunctional and exceptional environments. If you cannot address it, my point stands - whether or not you intend one thing or another; though I qualified my statements with two options: you either dont care about racial genocide of whites or you desire it. If not the latter, as you claim, then the former. In that case, your behavior is simply maladaptive.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Gutmenschen, Modern Misinterpretations and Online Encounters

Back to top Go down
 
Gutmenschen, Modern Misinterpretations and Online Encounters
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 3 of 3Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3
 Similar topics
-
» BACk ISSUES O.F.R. (Online Forum Release)
» Into the hands of MAO ZEDONG - architect of modern China!
» Invitation to the introduction of modern technology in banks
» Palm Vein Scanner
» God bless my online friends today

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: