Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalFAQMemberlistSearchRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 Forums

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11
AuthorMessage
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Fri Jun 23, 2017 7:31 am

How pathetic, how desperate and cowardly, do you have to be to seek justifications for race, in social constructs when Evolution Theory has already provided you with a framework?


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Fri Jun 23, 2017 12:17 pm

Anxiety, concerning the issues of race and sex, and homosexuality is expressed in the form of a obsession with how one is to treat this information.
For the Modern, to admit that there are differences between men and women, or the races, si the same as advocating some kind of violence, which they try to stop by denying these differences...essentially lying, or covering up the issue, or obscuring it, so that nobody is hurt.

The topic of what IS, is different form the topic of what "ought to be done about it".
One is ontological, the other moral.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Thu Jun 29, 2017 7:16 am

Saul-Well-Ios wrote:
'God' will be called the 'Primordial One'. I want to interpret this Primordial One as both Nietzsche and Spinoza do- an eternal and infinite form or 'being' which has expressed itself through the interactions and activities (or modes) of time, space and energy.
Struggling with his self-deception.
How to remake Christianity in a way that can incorporate Nietzsche's attack on it?
How to merge his messiah's anti-life, anti-real, with pre-Socratic pro-life, pro-real spirituality.
How to bridge Judaism and Hellenism, Nietzsche, his paternal, masculine idol, and Spinoza, his maternal, feminine, spirit.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Sun Jul 02, 2017 2:54 pm

You know...when someone tells me he is smart, and has measured his IQ and that it is !$), or !^)...i believe him. Because there is no way to determine how smart someone is, except by what he claims, using words.
So I apply this to all areas. When someone tells me he is strong, I cannot judge for myself how strong he is, but how much he lifts, or how he looks....he must tell me, otherwise I am lost in darkness.
When a moron tells me he is smart, declares it, or tells me his intelligence has been measured and he scored high, I am affected by his verbal statement. Because his performance, his ideas and how he presents and defends and rationalizes them, cannot help me to determine his intelligence, unless he tells me himself.
See, words over actions.
it goes back to Judeo-Christianity....the word, the idea, comes before the phenomenon, the act.
If he has an idea that he is smart, then this must usurp any activities.

So, when a moron from ILP tells me he is genius, MENSA material, I cannot judge his/her performance by how he thinks, posts his thinking, argues his/her positions...his/her assertion, takes precedence.
Words are first.
following the same genius 'logic' if someone tells me he is strong, I have no other way to judge the validity of this verbal claim...words preceded actions, and appearances are superficial.
If he says he can bench 400 lbs, I accept it as fact.
If he defines strength as love, and claims to be strong because he loves mass, then that is also a fact I must accept, despite my perception of actions and appearances.

In the end all that matter sis that we love and comfort one another....because that's true philosophy.
Are we not all strong and lovable, and precious, simply because we exist?
yes...even you crippled half-wit....despite living no life-support, and being protected and taken care of and protected from your own feebleness.....you too are precious because you exit...and you too, fat ugly chick are sexy, because you exist...and you too retarded schizophrenic are valuable because you exist, and you too pedophile and necrophiliac, defended by a system, from a certain violent death...you too are worthy of praise...because you exist...and if one day e place a brain in a vat, and tend to it...it too will be good and valuable, because it will be existing.



_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:14 pm

Those who profess to be 'beyond good and evil' have replaced it with the secular good and bad, and the Abrahamic god with a Primordial "one".
They remain as Judeo-Christian as they ever were...dreaming of reinventing Christianity in a post-Nietzsche world.

Existence is neither good or bad.
Neither.
Good/Bad only mean something in relation to an intent, conscious or otherwise.
All value judgments are meaningless without a goal, a motive, an objective.
If Saully wishes to imply that existence intends human life, then he should stop pretending to not be an Abrahamic Nihilist.....worshiping an icon that contradicts him.  
If this reality, void of good/bad, or a one anything, is considered 'negative' by him, then Saully is exposing how fragile and still stuck in Abrahamic Nihilism he truly is.
What a hypocrite.
The entire van clan are a band of actors, circus of clowns - pretenders.

As I've noted before, and Saully refuses to acknowledge, preferring to reduce me to an absurdity he can compete against with his "130+ IQ".......existence can only be considered positive, for a living organism that is made possible within it.
Void of absolutes, including a ONE by any name, it still remains positive...in that it is interactive, dynamic.
That feeble spirits still need the absolute to make existence tolerable, hints at the reason why they've made Nietzsche an icon, corrupting him by making him a shadow of Spinoza.
Such effete spirits latch onto anything that seems more masculine than themselves. So, from icon they go to idol, replacing it with a shamanic leader...like bitches looking for the top bull in the cow herd, to fertilize their vacant mind-womb.
Emasculated males, men-children, have the psychology of females...they need a superior masculine entity to stand behind, to belong to, to gain power by association, through.

Again, for Saully, the new Messiah's new Saul...
Existence is neither good or bad, neither good or evil....neither positive or negative.
Objectively speaking.
It is so only for life, for living organism who care about surviving, at all costs, and have now declared survival of anything a universal 'good'.

It is so only in relation to a goal, an intent, an ideal, a motive, an end.
Only conscious living organisms have those.
Cosmos has no end, no intent, no motive, no goal, no care...no self...only momentum.

So, yes, for living organisms who are not cowards and nit-wits or, to use his idol's language, are not herd manimals, reality, void of absolutes, including God, One, whole...is positive.
That weakling need a oneness, a god, a deus, a conatus, to make it positive, only exposes how feeble they are, and why they are nihilists, following around degenerate charlatan, repackaging an old dis-ease, and renaming an ancient mental illness...replacing 'love' with 'value'....to love loving love...and circular self-referential bullshyte of that Abrahamic kind.

No absolute means...no one.
No whole.
No Perfect, no Absolute.
One is an abstraction, a noumenon, a mental construct, helping the organism conceptualize fluidity, Flux.

The van clan is now accepting and permitting imbeciles to wear their sacred hoodies - a symbolic foreskin for the one they've chopped off.
It is because they measure quality with quantities...and their "philosophy" requires diseased minds to exist, having no existence in the exoteric...like a virus.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν


Last edited by Satyr on Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:51 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Sun Jul 02, 2017 7:32 pm

To a naive romantic idealist, the real world seems a negative place...and those who remind him of it, are considered agencies of negation. The negation of his delusions.
Those who burst his pseudo-intellectual bubbles, are bigots and angry vindictive bastards, who refuse to comfort and flatter him with soothing words and lies.  

To a liar, all truth is a negative.

To a hypocrite, integrity is a negative.

To a coward, courage is a negative.

To the ill, health is a negative, because being ill is all he knows, is all he can do to receive sympathy, kindness, love. His sickness get him tender attention - acknowledgment, so it must be good, it must be positive, because illness help him survive.

To an imbecile, intelligence is a negative.

To a boy, the father's tough love is cruel and negative.
He wants mammas forgiving, warm embrace....her soft bosom, her fairy-tales.

To a creature living in darkness, all light is intolerably negative. He's inverted reality, and now calls his darkness a superior, esoteric light.

When a mind is unable to make sense of the world directly, incapable of tolerating the light, he buries his head in books, or engages world through a proxy, a mediating, icon, a worshiped deified icon.
He finds representations of this icon, blowhard pretenders, bad imitations...to make it real.
He calls his darkness an esoteric light....his glowing spirit, fed by sycophants who comfort, and flatter his feeble essence.
His little candle light burns brightest when air is blown into it, having no great internal source of energy, but a small wick, flickering delicately in the winds, behind sturdy idealized walls.
He calls those who tell him nice things, who comfort and tell him how smart and creative he is...good...and those who expose him to himself, and what he truly is....bad...negative...cruel....

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:07 am



Dolarhyde...cleft-palate, split lip...speaking from both sides of his mouth - splintered mind.
Cleft tongue - the reptile, the snake slithering under cover.
Cold Blood, lacking internal fire...seeking it from external sources - sun, fire in the proverbial Platonic cave.
Wanting to see himself reflected in the eyes of others not in pieces but complete, whole, one.
Blind girlfriend, who does not see what he is - innocence.  

Wants to kill Hannibal, because he cannot be the Red Dragon with his presence in the world.
Works in darkness, prefers the night, not wanting to be seen before his transformation is completed.
Weakness dreaming of becoming something powerful - fragility wanting to become menacing, strong, durable.

Symbols he wears, thinking they transform his body.
He consumes art, symbols, words, wanting to absorb their essence - their power.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Mon Jul 03, 2017 8:40 am

One more time, because retardation is increasing by the minute:
There are no absolutes, other than noetic, linguistic, because language is a representation of noetic construct.
Facts are not absolutes...they are representations of relationships in world.

All value judgments are juxtapositions, expressions of relationships.
Value judgments are either successful or unsuccessful, more or less accurate.
There is no one, no whole, no God, no absolute.
There is only process, interacting, inter-relating.
There is no positive/negative, no good/bad, but only in relation to an organism - a life.  

Self only means something when there is memory - it refers to a continuum of memory. DNA is a form of memory.
Stones, clouds, water, particles have no memory, ego to use the word 'self' is a linguistic convention - a metaphor, not a description of an actual fact.
With no memory there is no Self, in the proper application of the word/symbol.

Value, Love are meaningless outside living organic relating - outside consciousness.
They describe a relationship, in relation to an intent, a goal, an objective, a goal, a motive.

Power , strength, is a measure of weakness - not omnipotence.
Objectivity is a measure of objectivity - not absolute awareness.
Knowing/Understanding is a measure of ignorance - not omniscience
Freedom/Independence is a measure of contingency, dependence.

Everything is degrees, not absolutes.
Only in the abstracting mind that reduces all to mental models, noetic constructs, is the absolute created/constructed by simplifying/generalizing, or imploding flux into an ambiguous thing, a singularity.
Because, just like the body needs a skin, a membrane, an exoskeleton, to differentiates its organizing from fluctuating disorganizing world, so does the mind need wholes to process a fluctuating, dynamic existence.

Values refer to ideals.
Ideals are either more or less realistic.
Not all values, judgment, ideals are equally realistic.
The word 'value' like the word 'self' is meaningless outside living contexts.
Value refers to a measurement, a judgment, a standard, referring to a goal, an objective.
Since world has none of this, only in relation to a conscious, living, organism can the word 'value' be applied.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Mon Jul 03, 2017 1:01 pm

It's funny how the one who wishes cancer on others, at the slightest hint of resistance, is now using insult to pretend he is the one who can appreciate existence.
Tolerating means, to the half-breed, deluding himself.
Using words not to clarify but to bury existence under heaps of lies, and delusions, to make it go away...and on top of the burial mound build fantasy alternatives, suing words arranged in whatever manner he pleases.
Using his method, even a retard can build the most appealing monument to his stupidity, and then invite his retarded friends to live in their special, private, universe, where all worship him.
For someone who claims to be able to take a challenge, he sure runs away fast.
I was banned from ILP otherwise he would be running away form there, as he did from KT.
Never pulled a tantrum...made others have fits, forcing them to banish me.

Maybe all he needs are simpletons, lost desperate boys, to flatter and pretend he's a wise man, calling this "productive"...a true heir of Nietzsche, and not expose him as what he truly is: another Abrahamic wannabe Messiah...with a huge chip on his narrow shoulders.
A miser.
Misinterpreting Nietzsche comes easier than misinterpreting Satyr...because Satyr lives and can and will correct their sorry arses, whereas the other doesn't....so they can put any meaning to his words they want....like the Primordial One, or now interpreting him in a new Abrahamic way.

Run away little obtuse bunny.
Run every time your nature is exposed...and be grateful to ILP's moderating tram protecting you from the likes of me.
At least Saully has the courage to admit that he visits and reads every post made on KT.
His hypocrisy lies in how he intentionally or because of a mental inadequacy, despite his reported 130 IQ, misinterprets of fails to comprehend what is being posted....Jakoff's hypocrisy is worse...because it's rooted in his essence.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Thu Jul 06, 2017 12:59 pm

He pulls a hissy-fit, and stomps-off, screaming that it will be a dark day in hell before he returns to where he isn't loved and appreciated.
After a few days with the boys healing his wounds, he returns wearing the same masks, he shares with his support group. He shares everything, even his love of self, even his masks, with the 'boys', which he calls 'friends'.
He pays them to be friends....with gifts of praise, like a father, not wanting to stifle his baby boys development...so fragile and sweet, like daddy.  

...bring your own drugs to get the full experience.
We, certainly, have not had that 'spirit' here, since...1969.

Quote :
On a dark desert low-way, hot air wind in my head
Warm smell of Kabbalah, rising up through the muck
Up before in the theoretical distance, I blindly saw a shimmering Menorah
My head grew heavy and my wit grew dim
I had to stop for the light
There she stood in the doorway;
I heard the Messiah's call
And I was emoting to myself,
"This could be Good, or this could be Bad"
Then she lit up a candle and she showed me the Torah
There were words down the page,
I thought I read them say...

Welcome to the Hotel Amsterdam
Such a lovely place (Such a valuable place)
Such a good face
Plenty of room at the Hotel Amsterdam
Any time of year (Any time of year)
You can drug me here

Her mind is Abraham-twisted, she got the Nietzsche bends
She got a lot of soft, soft man-boys she calls friends
How they cRap in the courtyard, sweet mitzvah sweat.
Some cRap to relieve themselves, some cRap to full-fill

So I called up the Commander,
"Please bring me my whine"
He said, "We haven't had that Hebrew spirit here since nineteen sixty nine"
And still those voices are calling from far away,
Go to bed in the middle of the day
Just to hear them say...

Welcome to the Hotel Amsterdam
Such a lovely place (Such a valuable place)
Such a good face
They livin' it down at the Hotel Amsterdam
What a nice surprise (what a nice surprise)
Bring your own drug induced alibis

Mirrors on the ceiling,
The pink cool-aid on heat
And she said "We are all just narcissists here, of our own device"
And in the master's chambers,
They gathered for the roast
They stab it with their butter knives,
But they just can't kill the goat

Last thing I remember, I was
Running for the door
I had to find the passage back
To the real world I was before
"Relax, " said the Rabbi,
"We are brain-washed to deceive.
You can check-out any time you like,
But you can never leave!
"



_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν


Last edited by Satyr on Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:09 pm; edited 3 times in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:40 am

God must be Greek because the bible, his word, was written in that language.

Some delusional "failosophies' are language specific.
They only make 'sense' in that language, and are nonsense in every other.
Perhaps the uni-verse, is versed in Dutch, or German, and losing its meaning in Mandarin, or Greek.
Perhaps a word centered delusion, using self-referential dim-tit methodology, is only comprehensible among the dim-witted, and those desperate enough to believe in any absurdity, because last I checked, world is common, and speaks no language.....but language emerged to refer to it.
Sure, different tribes, different races, display their attitude to nature, their relationship to world, through language, but that describing world, philosophically, can make sense only in some languages and be self-referential bullshyte in every other is, I admit a justification I had not encountered before.

We must invent a special kind of mathematics, I hear, to make delusional crap appear or be deep and meaningful.
The math we are using now, it being a language that the universe does not speak, seems to be inadequate when trying to grasp the profound insanity of these not-wits.  
Christianity never thought of claiming that the math science uses is not good enough to prove the existence of God, and that a new kind of 'spiritual' math and geometryy had to be invented to describe and prove their God,

1= love
0=hate

1=good
0=bad

Something like that.
Twisted Evil
You know, when need is placed before perception, then it is like Plato's metaphor of the charioteer psyche - the horses hold the reigns attached to the rider, who is pulling the chariot.
Inversion, through and through

Word before deed.
Cause before effect.
Life before existence.
Subjective before objective.
Art before world.
Superiority, before merit.
Value before judgment.

And on and on....down the degenerating path of this memetic, mental dis-ease.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν


Last edited by Satyr on Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:00 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Sat Jul 08, 2017 7:58 am

Wyndham, Lewis wrote:
Exploit Stupidity. = Introduce a flatness, where it is required into your commerce. Dull your eye as you affix it on a dull face… Mock the herd perpetually with the grimace of its own garrulity or deadness. If it gets out of hand and stampedes towards you, leap onto the sea of mangy backs until the sea is still. That is: cast your mask aside, and spring above them. They cannot see or touch anything above them: they have never realized that their backs — or rather their tops — exist! They will think that you have vanished into Heaven…Do not play with political notions, aristocratisms or the reverse, for that is a compromise with the herd. Do not allow yourself to imagine “a fine herd though still a herd.” There is no fine herd. The cattle that call themselves “gentlemen” you will observe to be a little cleaner. It is merely cunning and produced with a product called soap. But you will find no serious difference between them and those vast dismal herds they avoid. Some of them are very dangerous and treacherous. = Be on your guard with the small herd of gentlemen! [The Code of a Herdsman]

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Sat Jul 08, 2017 8:48 pm

Douche-bag, degenerates can only talk about other people\s thoughts, or what they think these thoughts are.  
They never talk about the world, directly, they only discuss about what some other said about world, or what they think some other said about world.
This other is usually some iconic figure, such as Jesus, Marx, Nietzsche, Freud...or whomever is popular among the crowd douche-bags seek approval, or to rise in status.
They exist within world, the world surrounds them and continuously engages them, but they cannot engage back without some mediating go-between, a proxy they stand BEHIND', so as to not stand forth.
The icon is some famous figure who must be dead, otherwise what these douche-bags think he said would be challenged by the icon himself...so the idol, has to be dead, so that degenerates can claim they understood best, or they represent the icon's ideas the best.
The world, of course, has no place, so whether what they, or the icon is saying about it, cannot be validated directly..
The dialogue is between interpretations of interpretations of world., and every interpretation is as likely as any other if it remain consistent and has a few quotes, by the icon, that seem to support a particular translation, or that are ambiguous, metaphorical enough, to lend themselves to some artistic leeway.
This is academic philosophy, if it can even be called philosophy.
It's a debate over who represents the particular icon/idol perfectly.
The world itself is insignificant, or enters the scene indirectly, like background noise.
It's a posturing challenge over knowledge, because most douche-bags haven't come to their interpretations of their own, but have read some analysis by a third-party, which sounded good, and they've adopted.

We're getting the picture now....a conflict over who translated, or adopted the most accurate translation, of an interpretation of the world by an icon and/or idol, who is popular among a specific crowed.
Direct perception of world is not in play. no conflict over who interpreted the world, directly, and accurately.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Sat Jul 08, 2017 9:40 pm

From the den of [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and leftovers.
Morality is an evolved method of relating, Evolved to facilitate heterosexual reproduction, which then evolved into social behavior, facilitating cooperative survival strategies.
Reason is defined as...

Quote :
Reason is the capacity for consciously making sense of things, applying logic, establishing and verifying facts, and changing or justifying practices, institutions, and beliefs based on new or existing information.

...so to say that Nietzsche was anti-reason would contradict his attempt to make sense of reality.
There is no truth...I agree, for 'truth' refers to a perspective which is more or less accurate. I guess that also makes me a post-modernist.
'Will to power' sounds awful lot like a 'truth'.

But why perspectivism?
Because existence is fluid, always changing - because all perspectives are incomplete, partial, superior or inferior - in other words because there is no absolute.
No absolute does not mean no superior/inferior.
The desire to incorporate Nietzsche into Abrahamic post-modernism follows the attempt to disassociate Judaism from Christianity.
This is how they want to reinvent Abrahamism by incorporating Nietzsche...just as Judaism was reinvented by incorporating a selective reading, and interpretation, of the Greeks.
He was against the modern scientific notion that all had an order, a rational explanation - Apollonian.
Alexandrian: all that exists can be known and understood, because chaos is complexity hiding a deeper order.

I call chaos the counter-intuitive nature of existence - randomness, lacking all order. Not complexity, as many degenerates define chaos.
I guess this makes me a post-modernist, for these clowns, because now they can claim that all is subjective and all is a human construct.
Wrong!

Of course the offspring of Judaism would come in conflict with the mother.
Daughters always do.
Marxism was against Christianity when they were the same dogma disagreeing on the existence of an absolute one god.
The same virus can have conflicting strains.
Jesus - Semite. Not a Jew. He rebelled against Judaism and its spiritual elitism.
Marx - Semite. A secular Jew.
Christianity wanted to incorporate segments of Hellenism, namely Plato, to become cosmopolitan, the other was more esoteric, restrictive, did not even proselytize, wanted a closed-clan of the chosen - only they would be saved.
This is why Judaism was hated, and why Christianity had to remedy this and make Judaism more inclusive by adopting some Hellenism - whatever was Parmenides based, as opposed to Heraclitus based .
But what's even more interesting is how the name Nietzsche seems to be an argument on its own.
The douche-bag, on ILP, gives us no quotes where Nietzsche is anti-reason, but feels that if he mentions the name, he's made an argument, because even if he has expressed anti-reason sentiments then that he did is like Jesus saying it.
The weight of the name, among degenerates of a specific kind, is astounding.

I am reminded of how Saul reinterpreted the world of another icon, Jesus, to create an antithesis to his teachings, by claiming it was what the icon/idol had meant.
Why do you think Nietzsche was so understanding of the Jesus figure?
He was a Dostoevskean romantic rebel, a fool, who would be abused after death, as he was in life - his words twisted to construct a Church with a new Pharisee elite.  
Nietzsche's words are twisted, by degenerates, associating him with leftist, with Marx, to create a new Abrahamic religion.

Christianity's failure to synthesize the contradictions between Judaism and Hellenism, exposed it to the critique of Nietzsche.
It is outdated, and must be replaced with a new version of Christianity that might incorporate segments or a reinterpretation of Nietzsche to make it more durable, at least to his kind of critique.
The virus adapts - evolves.
The reasons Nietzsche was anti-anti-Semitic, are: you do not hate something for being what it is, or what it can ever be; those who adopt a perspective to cope, to survive....you do not hate those who identify with being hated - playing into their victim-psychology...you do not hate a virus, you analyze, study it, and protect yourself from it - you immunize yourself to it. Hating it will do you no good, and it will invigorate it, if it identifies with being the ones chosen to suffer on behalf of God....Semite is a tribal category, genetics. Jewish in not. Judaism is, like Christianity, an idea(l), that wants to become tribal - memetics.
You do not hate the tribe infected by the dis-ease Judaism, no more than you hate the Germans for being infected by Christianity, or for being presently infected by post-modernism - Nihilism is the name of the memetic virus.
Whether it manifests in variations like Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Marxism, Humanism, post-modernity, Transhumanism is a separate issue.

Yet...from the idol's pen this...

Nietzsche wrote:
Could one count such dilettantes and old spinsters as that mawkish apostle of virginity, Mainlander, as a genuine German? In the last analysis he probably was a Jew (all Jews become mawkish when they moralize)(TGS 357).

A clear distinction between being a "genuine German" and a Jew.

This blatant attempt to distance Judaism from Christianity, and Marxism, is necessary for them to then dismiss Nietzsche devastating critique of Christianity.
How could they synthesize into Judaism the one who destroyed a variant of Judaism, and since they are idol worshipers, they believe this synthesis will inject Judaism with Pagan power, to convert it into a stronger Zionism virus.
Nietzsche is the key, in thir mind, to remake a secular Christianity - not Marxism, because that failed to materialize, but a post-modern humanism, to be given a makeover, and a fresh exciting new name.
Venus project failed.
Humanism is too confusing, because it sounds too much like 'human' with its biological connotations, and references to natural order.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Sat Jul 08, 2017 11:22 pm

This new form of secular degenerate uses the name Nietzsche as a show-stopper - a 'this conversation is done', piece, an exclamation point.
As if Nietzsche said it, so end of conversation.
It's typical of emasculated men-boys.
The Marxist used to use Marx in the same way, or Lenin.
Christian degenerates used Scripture, and Jesus.

It seems the announcement of God's death, took them by surprise.
Like little duckling, emerging out of their egg, they imprinted on the first one they saw - which was The one that cracked the egg shell to help them be reborn as a secular douche-bag.
The death of God seems to have created much anxiety in the herd. The shepherd is dead, where shall the bovines sleep, tonight, where shall they find food and water?

They look around and there stands the one who appears to have killed him...a dude with a rather large moustache.
So, they begin to follow him, having no place to go.

For me, so and so said it is not an end in the conversation but a beginning, or a short pause.
See, I don't give a shit who said what....because world is my standard and my guide, and I have direct and immediate access to the world.
I may consult a guide to help me determine what the hell I am looking at, but I do not need eyes to see for me, or a brain to think for me, or a consciousness to judge and discern patterns  
I listen to my guide with rapt attention, and am grateful for his help, but then I compare what he said with what I see...or sense.

I never needed a god, or an idol, or a hero, or a leader....so god's death, and his subsequent absence did not leave any void in my life.
Nobody broke me out of my egg-shell, my cocoon....I broke through, and there was nobody there...so I explored on my own.  
In time I met some companions, some mentors, some guides, and a whole lot of morons, douche-bags and degenerates.

Sure, I respect the judgment of a wise man, or a man who has proven himself by the accuracy of his insights, more than I respect, or pay attention to morons and imbeciles....but I do not accept all his judgments, and insights as a given.
I test them. I validate them on my own.
I make them my own.
I even do so with morons and imbeciles, because I've found that a retard can say something smart, once in a while.
You just never know when this will happen.
I listen to morons and only dismiss them when I've heard their idiocies before.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Sun Jul 09, 2017 7:48 am

Again....Why I am not an anti-Semite.

1- You cannot be against something, or someone, for being what it is.
You cannot be anti-bacteria, or anti-lion, or anti-Indo-European, or anti-virus without being anti-nature.
You do not hate something or someone for being what it evolved to be.
you may combat it, study it to deal with its existence, and to prevent from being harmed by it, but you do not hate it.
Hate, like love, like all emotions are automatic reactions to stimuli - they cloud reason, they do not clarify it.
Emotions can be used to take advantage of millions of years of evolution, and genetically stored knowledge/data, to be applied as intuition, as passion to motivate one against what threatens, but not to illuminate, and to understand.

2- Semite is a tribal, genetic designation.
Semite indicates a bloodline, which in this case is carried forth through matrillineally.
Semite is not the same as Jew...though the Semites invented Judaism to come with their lowly tribal status.
Being Christian is not the same as being of German blood, or Greek, or Italian.
Christian, like Judaism, or Marxism are ideologies - memes.
You can fight communism without being anti-Russian. Russians may have carried the meme, made it flourish, identified with it, but Russian is a genetic designation of a sub-category, a bloodline within the Indo-European genetic family, whereas Communism, Marxism, is an idea(l), invented by a Jew.
Fighting against communism does not mean you hate Russians, or all tribes infected by this variant of the Nihilistic dis-ease.

3- Victimizing Jews, plays into their self-identity.
Hating Jews invigorates their sense of self - their earthly mission, to be the designated victims for their mono-god's sake.
They are 'chosen' to suffer, so making them suffer reaffirms their identity.
Hating those who, according to their own dis-ease, were placed on the earth to be hated, is playing into their sickness.
Their identity is rooted in this role, to such a degree, that they deny it to all other degenerates.
This is why Christianity opposed Judaism, and was an adaptation of the same dis-ease. Christianity, like Islam proselytized, they gladly offered salvation to all sickly, feeble, desperate individuals across tribal, genetic lines...sometimes by force. Christianity in its early days, and Islam to the present.
Judaism is victim-psychotic elitism.
All tribes think of themselves as superior to all other tribes, but in this case the inversion attempts to evade testing this claim.
They find pride in humility, in humiliation, degradation, degeneration.
The more you humble, humiliate, degrade them, the more they bond with one another.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:07 am

This [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] who is just the latest reincarnation of the same moron that follows the Messiah around for some self-loving, salvation, perceives Will to Power as the will to reinvent yourself, so as to escape your feebleness in a previous manifestation....that changing your name, pretending not to be who you were, somehow saves you, protects you from your own genetic inferiority.

This moron denies race, for this reason.
He follows a tending way of escaping past, trying to not be held accountable to centuries of nurturing = nature.
He simply declares race as a social construct, but cannot explain how, if this is the case,  species are produced.
if not gradually, producing intermediate genetic stages, then how?
Overnight...miraculously, magically?
And, if during these periods of genetic isolation that produced such obvious physical differences, how did environment affect the body, and left the mind, the brain, unaffected?
If this is what he is implying, because we have to speculate, since he does not dare expose the depths of his idiocy. He only knows he knows Nietzsche....and that he was another post-modernist, and because Nietzsche was critical of Darwin's theory, then this means that it is concluded, Evolution does not work.
How, then did intelligence evolve?
Magically?
Suddenly?
Spontaneously?
How did consciousness evolve?
Overnight?
One day there were plants everywhere and then poof, there appears an amoeba, and then a few centuries later, poof, overnight, a higher organism appears out of nowhere...no gradual process, but miraculous events distributing traits uniformly.
Then what exactly is naturally selected?
Pleasure, like some degenerates like to think.

For degenerates of this intellectual level race, like breeds, are not about inherited trait potentials, but social constructs....implying that species is also a social construct, because race/breeds or whatever name you give to the particular intermediate stage of speciation, is a human fabrication.
They hope.
They hope because if it is not so, then they are not as free to imagine themselves gods, as they like to feel that they are.
Will to power, for these desperate lowlifes is a will to Locke's tabula rasa....to wipe your genetic slate clean and then rebuild yourself a god, or just declare yourself one.  
Declare yourself anything, because words/symbols are powerful magical instruments the will uses.
Look at the powerful effect the word Nietzsche has over their pathetic minds...as the name/word Jesus, or Allah, has on a different strand of this degeneration.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

We exist to feel pleasure, or is pleasure a sensation of meeting needs?
Do we eat to survive, or because it feels good?
Why do we defalcate? Is it because ti feels good?
Why do we feel good when massaged? because our muscles evolved to be massaged?
Why does it feel good?

If practices take on additional functions over time, like food taking, preparation, displaying, evolved into a social ritual, a symbolism, from gene to meme, does this mean we evolved the orifices, the organs, the practice for these subsequent functions, or because eating felt good?
Does existence care for our pleasures?  Do we exist to pleasure ourselves?
Is the cosmos running on Hedonism?
Smoking crack feels good as well. Did we evolve to smoke crack?
Is our mouth the perfect shape for smoking?
To pedophiles it feels good to rape children.
Necrophiliacs feel pleasure fucking cadavers.

We evolved to drink water, did we then invent alcohol as an alternative way to drink liquids that felt good?

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Sun Jul 09, 2017 9:20 am

Religion = a cult that goes mainstream.
Postmodernity is becoming a religion, as Marxism is.
This is why it competed with Judeo-Christianity.

Religion = spirituality for the masses.
Philosophy dumbed-down so that the mediocre can participate, with a rudimentary, emotional understanding of the concepts.
Religion makes the ideal approachable by the average dumbass.
Religion = opium of the people....which was replaced by Marxism, now morphing into post-modernity
Class struggle expressed as identity crisis.
Religion = organized spirituality...using a central dogma...as did Marxism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam...but not paganism, never Hinduism.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Sun Jul 09, 2017 1:14 pm

Bond of True Philosophers across Time & Space

A pagan, a realist, will know that different perspectives will reach the same general conclusions, about the world, because world is common, whereas perspectives are not.
The degenerate, narcissist, will believe he has exclusive knowledge of the world, which only he, and his ilk, know, and that if others know it, independently, that they stole it, from him.
This is why Nietzsche is such an iconic figure for men-children of a particular kind of hyper-masculine, overcompensating, narcissistic psychosis.
The fact that Nietzsche did not say anything unique, but only took a ancient philosophy, attitude, and brought it up to date in a post-Christian, alludes them.
That Nietzsche just verbalized psychotic insights many shared, alludes them.

They think that before Nietzsche none of this was available.

This is how they approach all their own nihilistic detached from relativity, views.
Because their vies are nonsensical abstractions that have little, if anything to do with the real world, they can claim that their delusions are unique, because nobody else can be psychotic, in the same way - subjectivity.
Any view that speaks honestly, courageously, and clearly about a common existence, will expect to meet minds that share the same general views, having reached them independently.
The only thing they can claim is a deeper insight, perhaps. A view that connects phenomena in ways the common man cannot, or perceives details that the common mind cannot....but once verbalized the reaction is one of re-cognition....an un-covering of what was always right before their eyes.
Pagans speak of 'truth' as a raising of the veil of ignorance...a re-calling.  

The one who speaks clearly, truly, insightfully, produces re-cognition in those who intuitively knew, or felt what was going on but could not speak it, form it into a distinct and clear abstraction.
Nothing is coerced....nothing unique is spoken, nothing occult is revealed.
The one who hears something about the world which he can validate, has experienced, he can test....will not experience the revelation as something occult, new, unique, but will stand in awe at what was always before his eyes, always apparent, but he could not articulate, or illuminate.

I've been constructing my philosophical views since I was a boy. They came together, in my mind, during the late nineties. I wrote The Feminization of Man in the nineties.
Do I claim those who now speak of feminization stole the idea from me?
No....because what was evident, to me, early on, became clear for others later.
They reached the same conclusion, no their own.
I've thought the thoughts I later shared, going back to the nineties.
I read Nietzsche late nineties, and he put words to concepts I was already aware of, and articulated psychological insights using language I could not use, at the time.
He un-covered what I already knew was true...as did Schopenhauer, and all the intellectuals I read, each to a greater or lesser extent.
I, then, in turn did the same to others.  
Other will then do the same to others....and so on.

Nobody invents reality.
Each reports on it, to his own particular mental and physical ability, talent with language, honesty/integrity, courage, and intelligence.
are my metaphysical positions on patterns, and chaos/order unique/
No.
Others have used different imagery, metaphors, to express the same...perhaps with some subtle differences.
How could not different minds, with the same motive, the same talents, integrity, not reach the same conclusions when we all share the same world?
Subjectivity is about a common Objective world.

Only in Nihilism where detachment is the goal, can the surreal, the supernatural, the bizarre, the inventively cowardly, claim uniqueness, or originality, because only when the mind detaches from world can it create its own private reality, with its own private symbols/words/language others have to be trained, indoctrinated to decipher.
So, when you come across a douche-bag who claims to have invented something unique, or that knows of the absolute, you can rest assured that you've come across a narcissist, who is overcompensating for a deep secret self-doubt, and sense of inferiority.

Unique - a rearrangement of the perceived, which in the case of philosophy must follow a pre-exiting order - natural order.
What is unique in philosophy is the language, the imagery, the metaphors used to describe the same phenomena, each one implying an extra little something, that cannot be justified empirically.
What is extraordinarily unique is madness, schizophrenia, insanity, because detachment from natural order leaves the mind free to make any combinations it wishes to fabricate in order to cope, or to compensate for its its fragility, and its inadequacy.

True philosophers share a spirit that can recognize the other in a room full of lesser minds. A look of lonely commitment, that has spent years in the desert, finally finding the same oasis.
They may use different languages, different symbols, different metaphors, but what they are describing is the same watering hole, the same world; what is apparent to all.
They instantly recognize the pretender, who has been given a map to the oasis, or the one who wanting to raise his status, claims to have found a deeper well.

They also can smell a liar who has found nothing but sand in his own brain.
This is why it is important to use words precisely, and not to combine them in strange, nonsensical configurations, or to use an inappropriate word to describe a phenomena already named.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Mon Jul 10, 2017 7:07 am

Ironic that those who disparage the SJW's, and their rejection of sex differences, use the same principles to reject race.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Æon
Wyrm
avatar

Gender : Male Posts : 1805
Join date : 2014-03-25
Location : Outside

PostSubject: Re: Forums Tue Jul 11, 2017 3:17 pm

I remember why I only briefly visit ILP and won't stay for long. The level of "philosophy" there is amateur at best, and mediocre normally. Nothing and nobody shines forth. No jewels in the mud, no diamonds in the rough. Much effort is required to pull out of any "thinker" there, any wisdom at all. Perhaps there are a few rounder, smoother stones than others, but nothing lustrous and brilliant.

Any quality that forum has had over the years has already been sucked dry.

I think it is time again, soon, to look for greener pastures.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Tue Aug 01, 2017 2:59 pm

As it pertains to the big-three issues of post-modern idealism (nihilism) - femininity, homosexuality, and race - to begin taking these degenerates seriously, we must say that we do not obsess over these issues, but only use them because they have adopted them as the issues that define their attitude towards the world and existence.
These, detached from reality, minds, must prove themselves worthy of respect, and seriousness, by explaining ...

1- How, given their own positions, species evolve, with no intermediate states (races, breeds, phenotype)...
Did a creator create species?
Did they suddenly emerge, out of nothing, with no gradual states?
Some other absurdity, not rooted in emotional and naive idealism?

How does intelligence evolve?
...if it is evenly distributed and all are born with an equal potential for it, more so, if this is so, why is it even an evolutionary advantage?
Why does appearance matter in all contexts EXCEPT when it comes to humans, where nothing about the book can be determined by its "cover"?
Did our senses evolve to aid us some of the time, and not others, and if so what is the line deterring when appearances matter and when they do not?
Is is social continent, emotion, the title 'human'...some other arbitrary nonsense?

In relation to homosexuality, if sex is not for reproduction, and it is for pleasure....then was the cosmos made for our human pleasures, or do pleasures reflect an evolved function?
Did God, in the end, make the world to satisfy us?
Why do homosexual behaviors only appear in social species? What, additional, functions do they serve, if reproduction is not it?

In relation to Race...
How can species splinter-off, from a common ancestor, into varieties, if no gradual states are accepted as being valid?
If appearance does not expose essence, or inherited potentials, then why do we perceive differences or discriminate? Why would we bother?
What else, other than genetic potential, regarding physical and mental traits, can a species, or any sub-categories, refer to?
If Race is a social construct, then why is species not so...or is it? The former is a sub-division of the latter, or is it also a social construct?
If degenerates cannot offer a plausible, rational, not emotional, explanation then why would we begin to engage them on any serious level?
Would we not be wasting our time on minds that perceive the world through ideology, emotional, and personal gratification?
How can any serious discussion be had with a child, or a schizophrenic, or a mad-man existing in his own private reality?

If something as basic, as common sense, as obvious, as sexual and racial differences is not acknowledged, then how can we proceed further, into what to do or not do about it, or further still towards more intricate and interesting topics?
What serious conversation is possible on the issue of physics with a mind that denies gravity, or the obvious difference between light and dark, hot and cold, and bases his disagreement on declarative dismissals, hear-say, statistics, popularity, or word-games?

The rejection of sexual and racial differences is the social construct.
attempting to make them a social construct, is an attempt to bring them down to the level of absurdity where emotional tactics may hold an advantage.

Social conventions, and the necessities of integrating heterogeneous populations, into stable "wholes" aside...the denial of sexual differences, or specialization, requires a dismissal of a basic component of Evolution Theory.
To deny race is to indirectly deny select portions of Evolution Theory.
If you would outright reject Evolution Theory and expose your roots in Abrahamism and Marxism, it would make you more than just cowards and hypocrites.
But, then...what is the alternative?
Creationism?
A hodge-podge selection of Evolution Theory, based on our preferences, our preferred ideology, our personal interests, our emotions, or well-being?
Using the term "Darwinism" as an insult, like Nazi, or Hitler...without justifications or explanations, is what imbeciles and cowards do.

How does Evolution theory work, if all are born with the same potentials?
I mean, how would the label species even be rational if this were the case?
If environment only affects body, the physical, but has no effect on the mind, on the "spiritual" then why would intelligence be so dominant?
If specialization does not re-appropriate trait energies, developing some more than others, then how does the term 'specialization' even make sense when speaking of species that specialize in niche survival method?
Why do twins, one male and one female, have different heights and muscle masses, if specialization was not a fact....and if it has such obvious physical "injustices", then why would the mind be spared?

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Tue Aug 01, 2017 7:26 pm

As it was repeated [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]..., and in-line with Bottom<>Up reasoning...Physics, the experienced world, the sensually perceived world, the world we come in contact with through our senses, the world we connect our abstractions to using words/symbols, the world we all share and within which we emerge, before we belong to a culture, the world as it is, not as we like we wish it were, the world we must validate our judgments against, the PHYSICAL, REAL world, outside our brains, is the starting point.
The BOTTOM.
This BOTTOM, starts with us, as dynamic representation of the sum of all past nurturing, in constant movement towards an undisclosed, unfolding future.
We are the product of a continuum - we are the manifestations of a past.
This Bottom, call it, or ignorance, or instinct, or genes, is from where we go upward, metaphorically speaking, towards future - towards ideals - and downward, metaphorically, speaking - towards the sum-total of the unknown past, towards the foundation of our continuum, towards the deep dark past, the unseen, microscopic, the detailed, the submerged, the metaphysics.
This is the part of existence we call order.
That which may be intuited, known, understood, and therefore, symbolized, abstracted, named, conceptualized.

Physics cannot be contradicted by metaphysics, nor contradict ideals.
Past cannot contradiction, presence, appearance, nor can presence contradict future, the objective, the goal.

Therefore, sex, race, everything and anything having to do with the organism in question, cannot contradict past, nor can it be used to contradict the hoped for, the expected, the predicted.
If past/present/future are not aligned, the structure is in disharmony with itself.
The mental model can only survive if it selectively, and willfully chooses to separate the contradicting parts, and use vagueness, insinuations, feelings, to cover them up with jargon, with seduction, with hope mongering.
Such a subjective incoherence will face error after error, mistake after mistake, surprise after surprise, demanding constant corrections, denials, accusations, blaming everything and everyone but the mental model itself, blaming all but the self, attempts to cover them all up with allusions, mystification, obfuscation, defensive ego sheltering, overcompensating self-aggrandizing declarations, word-games.  

Only a protective system can save such minds from the predictably inevitable, so that it can live and die, is complete ignorance, and delusional numbness.
But, what does such a protection cost?
Nothing is for free.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14413
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Forums Tue Aug 15, 2017 4:32 pm

The same mistakes about the same subjects are forcing me to repeat myself.

This mistake has to do with Abrahamism, and the Jewish question.
A lot of bullshyte seems to be floating about on both sides, so here's my clarification of my positions on the subject, in brief.


1- Semites are genetic, Jews are memetic.
Not all Semites are Jews and not all Jews are Semites.
Judaism is like Islam and Christianity....an idea, a dogma, a meme.
Christians are not a race, and neither are Muslims.
Semites are part of the Indo-European family, or race.
Semites were like today's Gypsies - outcasts living on the periphery of other tribes.
Not only did they deny a noetic delusion as salvation to other slaves, they were shameless in their willingness to do anything and everything to survive.
They did what nobody was able to lower themselves to do, to earn a living. This brought them wealth and great disrespect.
But they were shameless, having converted shame to guilt, and then constructed Armageddon as an absolution (see 5).  
They've been driven out numerous times, gradually evolving their victim psychology into a religion of inversion (Nihilism) - Judaism


2- Judaism is the mother of both Christianity and Islam.
Judaism developed within Semitic tribes, influenced by their contact with Egyptian and Persian civilization, or memes.
Christianity was produced when Judaism came into contact with Paganism, and in particular Roman and Hellenic memes.
Islam developed from Zoroastrianism and Judaism coming into contact with desert tribes, with their own spiritual traditions.
Contact with Paganism, through Rome and Hellenism, Judaism splintered into three distinct, and often antagonistic types:
1-Spiritual Judaism - Orthodox
2-Political Judaism - Zionism.
3-Cultural Judaism - Marxism, Humanism, Transhumanism etc.

Contact with Judaism produced in Rome Christianity, which later evolved into Humanism and then Marxism etc.


3- Judaism is a mental parasite - a memetic virus, just like Christianity and Islam: these are variations of it.
These variations are adaptations, due to the aforementioned contact with different genetic hosts.
To understand how parasites spread, or behave, study genetic parasites like the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
The Semites were the first hosts infected with this mental virus, or rather they are the host within which this anti-life, anti-nature psychosis morphed into what it is today - the host within which the parasite inverted reality to help the host survive.
Another analogy would be cancer. Cancer develops out of the reproductions of healthy cells, resulting in the host body's eventual death.
Parasite is more precise an analogy, because like the lancet fluke, for instance, the hosts brain is taken over, making the host behave in ways not normal for the particular species - behavior that increases the probability of its own demise.
The parasite is only motivated by its own survival, at the expense of the host's.
Like all mental parasites it is totally noetic,or linguistic, theoretical, symbolic.  


4- Judaism became so seductive to the outcasts in all civilizations that it had to stop proselytizing and became elitist - denying its "salvation" and victim identity to all but the original tribes.
This was the first reason they were hated, feeding into their victim identity - creating their victim identity.
Jesus was a rebel, a threat only to Judaism, not to Rome, because he preached salvation for all slaves belonging to all races and tribes, contradicting Judaisms 'chosen' identity.
As a mental parasite (memetic virus) it can morph into any form, because it is unhindered by natural order, and so its symbolism (metaphors, mysticism) and language is free to synthesize into any form, as long as it remains communicable (viral, infectious), and seductive - able to attract as many minds as possible - popular/populist.
Quantities over Qualities.  


5- As outcast Jews became those who did the jobs, the work, the members of the civilization they coexisted with, did not want to do - all the labour, considered shameful or beneath the lowliest of the low, they did bringing them great wealth.
This willingness to shame themselves to degrade themselves, in order to survive, made them even more undesirable, and yet useful - this increased their wealth.
Eventually this resulted in a self-contradiction, forcing Judaism to turn against itself, or to become secular - changing so as to deal with power that contradicted their victim identity.
They are now known for their duplicity, and double standards, just as all nihilists characterized by self-contradiction, for reasons described elsewhere.
Shamelessness, their willingness to do anything to survive, for survival's sake, made them able to gain wealth and power, that, in time, contradict their victim psychology - resulting in the Jewish Paradox, which manifested in the other two Jewish, secular, types (Zionism and Marxism).  
(see 7)


6- It is to be expected that as outcast and despised, or looked down upon by all tribes - part of their victim identity as the chosen, by their God of gods, to suffer -  that they would help one another when possible, and cooperate with each other, against all tribes, particularly the one they coexisted with.
This is the extent of their conspiratorial nature, multiplied by this wealth their shamelessness provided.
Unlike what the average simpleton thinks, conspiracies do not require the lucid or conscious participation of a close knit clique - although, sometimes, this too is possible.
A conspiracy does not invent, or create, the forces it exploits. It simply manipulates what emerges within the environment.
Therefore, no great secret plan is required....particularly not when dealing with a mental parasite that hijacks a host's will.  
No grand conspiracy, no big pan, required. This is all about the meme producing the kinds of world-views, psychologies, required to propagate itself.


7- Eventually Judaism splintered into three distinct types:
a-Orthodox (spiritual) - true to the original teachings
b- Cultural (Zionism) - attempting to return to being a tribe among tribes.
c- Political (Marxism) - a secularized form of Judaism and Christianity.
This last wants to disappear into a world converted to secular Judaism - postmodernism, Marxism - by eliminating all identifiers, beginning with natural noes, such as race and sex.
They are trying to imitate how Hellenism dominated Rome culturally, memetically, after Rome conquered them, dominating them physically, genetically.  
These three variants are in conflict with each other, as they ascend in power in the west.
Three viral strains competing over which one will infect the same host.  


8- You cannot defeat a memetic virus like Abrahamism....because it identifies with being hated, or victimized, just as it would be useless to hate the flu, or cancer, or insanity.
In medicine one increases the possibilities of remaining healthy, by using preventative measures....because once infected it is more difficult to get well.
Eradicating a virus is impossible. It reemerges when the right conditions permit such dis-eases to reproduce: overpopulation, rampant breeding, imbalance with nature, resource pressures etc.
Like a virus a memetic virus can lie dormant for centuries, before a host comes along.
A memetic virus, such as Abrahamism, spreads using symbols/language - semiotics - passing from mind to mind, because it cannot survive outside minds, or in the world with no host, no proxy.
Preventative measures might be studying the virus you wish to not be infected by, staying away from infected individuals, boosting your autoimmune system by taking care of yourself, and feeding your mind invigorating, nutritious ideas, knowledge, exercise in the Hellenic sense: mind and body askesis or ascetics...and so on.


9- The psychology that produces the nihilistic reaction called Judaism, is in all of us. It is the human mind awakening to a cosmos full of present and immanent threats, uncertainty, producing existential anxiety, insecurity, fear.
Nihilism is the byproduct of human self-consciousness. Judaism is this nihilistic reaction as it developed and was established in the west, due to particular historical circumstances. In the east the very same psychological reaction to world took another form.
Judaism based on its shameless acceptance of its victim status, inverted reality to make its shame into pride, or guilt, which could be denied.
Innocence is the core of Abrahamic psychosis.  
In Christianity is became the notion of 'sin' - primordial guilt. We are ALL guilty of the primordial sin.
To this day guilt is part of the Jewish psychosis, replacing shame.
Guilt is how the victim retains the possibility of innocence.
Guilt is how those who expose Abrahamics are labelled - guilty of hate, of victimizing the eternal victims.
Guilt can deny culpability - shame is what self feels when it becomes aware of itself in relation to others, requiring acceptance and self-development.
Shame forces one to correct self.
Guilt forces one to deny, to lie, to hide.
Guilt implies innocence, as a goal one can achieve through death.
Shame can be erased through life - living, making amends.  
Judaism is the apotheosis of existential angst - modern stereotype of the neurotic Jew.    


10- Judaism may be a part of the genetic type Indo-European, but culturally, memetically, it is an inversion, an antithesis to its principles.
It is inversion (negation) presented as an alternative, so as to cope with a primordial existential anxiety, and the awakening to its own essence its own status within life's hierarchy.
This is what makes it a product of Nihilism, or 'positive nihilism' which projects human fabrications (abstractions, noumena) into world as symbols/words, so as to compensate for their absence - absent absolute.
Whereas nihilism proper, accepts this absence as a universal 'truth' it uses to negate everything, the 'positive nihilist' like Judaism, and Christianity/Islam replaces experiences reality with a 'positive' alternative, justifying it as 'beyond, immanent, future, hidden, complex, mystical.
it's inability to validate its own concepts directly using world, sensually, forces nihilism to seek validation esoterically, where mind can fabricate any 'truth' uninhibited by natural order, and sell it using emotional, and hedonistic justifications.
This is what makes Judaism seductive, and why it had to become elitist, denying its inverting salvation to all but the 'chosen 12-13 Semitic tribes.
Christianity/Islam, and then Marxism, were an overcoming of this Jewish spiritual elitism.
Cross infection converted Judaism into Christianity, by absorbing select part of Hellenism, such as Platonic and Parmenidean philosophy, and Judaism was also affected by this contact with the more cosmopolitan Hellenic spirit, morphing into Marxism, and splintering into the political and social Jewish political and social branches.
Based on this cross-infection a 'bridge synthesis' is attempted to merge or to associate  how the memetic virus morphed by corrupting Hellenism, and how it was affected by this contact, corrupting Judaism.
The similarities between these two corrective effects is where Moderns seek a synthesis, to claim a similarity between contrary memes, Hellenism and Judaism - mixing oil and water.


11- It is this inversion that appeals to the masses and their primordial fear of dying - survival instinct.  
Nihilism is seductive, 'positive', pleasing, because it offers an alternative to a world the majority cannot cope with, and a majority that finds themselves awakening to their own inadequacies, in relation to others; their own inferiority, and status within natural order and social hierarchies.
Nihilism is a quick and easy solution, because it demands no effort, no physical work, but only mental verbal acrobatics and self-deception - faith.
Image a method that provides a solution to each and every individual anxiety, and insecurity.
Such an addictive solution would feel like salvation.
That it was denied to the other tribes, by the Jews was a matter of resentment towards those that had looked down upon them, and had driven them out of their cities for centuries - retribution of the vanquished.
Jesus was an affront to their control over the inverting method. Jesus taught the masses that such inversions did not require an authority, but could be achieved privately, subjectively. No church, no pretests, no talented artistic mediums, and no authority figures were required to give find salvation in inversion, in Nihilistic spirituality.
This was his threat on central authority, which Saul later corrected.
Post-Modernity is the final stage of individual salvation from reality - from nature.
Each individual can find "God" his own personal messiah, on his/her own, by rejecting world and immersing himself in his own private universe - this was the message of the Christ, and he was the first practitioner.
Love was the inter-subjective matrix required to allow each individual to escape reality inward. The method required a protective shield, like a sleeper requires a warm, safe place to surrender to dreams.  
 

 
That's it for now.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Forums

Back to top Go down
 
Forums
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 11 of 11Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11
 Similar topics
-
» Spiritual Forums
» WFCAM Transit Survey
» The Early Years: 1969 - 1977
» Forum Rank Structure
» I'll start . . .

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: