Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalFAQMemberlistSearchRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 Science, Epistemology, experts, and so on

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
AutSider



Gender : Male Posts : 943
Join date : 2015-04-29
Location : Outside

PostSubject: Science, Epistemology, experts, and so on Sat Jul 29, 2017 2:47 pm

I intended this to be a response to the recent insanity in the Feminism thread (starting here: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] but decided to make a separate thread, as it is slightly off-topic and I think it deserves to be discussed independently of feminism.

Ideally experts would be unbiased and always search for the objective truth. But as it is, they are restricted on what to research and what conclusions to write, both financially, as somebody needs to fund their research, as well as socially, as they can get socially ostracized or even fired for expressing views going contrary to the mainstream political agenda.

Even if the situation was ideal I would still rely on my own judgment first and foremost, but I would consider the opinions of experts more seriously. But in the fucked up world we live in, where people who employ basic common sense are in a minority and derided as "extreme", and where everybody who dares to question the mainstream narrative is persecuted, I frankly couldn't care less if some expert disagrees with me on anything. It doesn't affect my opinion in the slightest.

If the experts tell me X and I see Y, how am I supposed to trust the experts? If our own judgment is untrustworthy, and the decision to trust the experts is made by our own judgment, then that decision must also be untrustworthy. In the end, the only things anybody has to judge the validity of anything are their own mind and senses. If we give that up, we have nothing to fall back on.

It reminds me of a discussion on Atheist Experience, from 5:00 to the end



If you give up your moral compass, then how can you claim that God's orders are moral, since your moral compass is what gives you the ability to evaluate something as moral or immoral.

The reasoning is the same, except that it is about morality, and I'm talking about epistemology. Just substitute the terms:

Moral compass = Epistemological compass (mind/senses/judgment)
God = The state appointed experts
God's orders = The state appointed experts's "research" and "sources"
Moral = True
Immoral = Untrue
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14975
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Science, Epistemology, experts, and so on Sat Jul 29, 2017 2:56 pm

Peterson and other academics have exposed the dark side of academic censorship.
These humans, with families and interests and fears.
Very few, like Peterson, would risk reputation, expose themselves to the multitudes of insane douche-bags out there, to speak the truth, on any level.

In the on The Natural History of Rape, Thornhill and Palmer write on the pressures placed upon academics, and how academia is biased, and censored in matters pertaining to humanities.
They go into how in the field of Evolutionary Psychology the majority repeat the social norms, with no justification at all.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
 
Science, Epistemology, experts, and so on
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Video of Islamic State capabilities impresses military experts
» Gledhill Pulsacoil Experts - 0800 046 1241 (Also Free Help Guides Available)
» Calling our Canadian experts please!
» Deletion of zeros .. experts underestimate the effects of .. and the Central Bank considers a reformist project

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: