Desperate Degenerates

Quote :

di·a·logue
ˈdīəˌläɡ,ˈdīəˌlôɡ/
noun
1.
conversation between two or more people as a feature of a book, play, or movie.
"the book consisted of a series of dialogues"
synonyms: conversation, talk, discussion, interchange, discourse; More
verbNORTH AMERICAN
1.
take part in a conversation or discussion to resolve a problem.
"he stated that he wasn't going to dialogue with the guerrillas"

Δια-Λογος Dia-Logos
Dia = via, through, by way of...
Logos = speaking, logic, offering reasons and reasoning.

Quote :

de·gen·er·ate
adjective
dəˈjen(ə)rət/
1.
having lost the physical, mental, or moral qualities considered normal and desirable; showing evidence of decline.
"a degenerate form of a higher civilization"
synonyms: debased, degraded, corrupt, impure; formalvitiated
"a degenerate form of classicism"
2.
technical
lacking some property, order, or distinctness of structure previously or usually present, in particular.
synonyms: corrupt, decadent, dissolute, dissipated, debauched, reprobate, profligate; More
noun
dəˈjen(ə)rət/
1.
an immoral or corrupt person.
synonyms: reprobate, debauchee, profligate, libertine, roué
"a group of degenerates"
verb
dəˈjenəˌrāt/
1.
decline or deteriorate physically, mentally, or morally.
"the quality of life had degenerated"
synonyms: deteriorate, decline, slip, slide, worsen, lapse, slump, go downhill, regress, retrogress; more

generate = to produce, to create.
de-generate = to undo what has been generated - to annul what has been produced.

Person A, offers a theory explaining a phenomenon.
Person B offers another explaining the same.
Person C another...and so on.

Telling Person A that his theory is his own, is stating the obvious.
It is not a contradiction to the theory he proposes.
Implying that he is wrong, is not proving he is wrong.
Stating that his theory is his own, is not proof of anything, particularly when it is not accompanied with a contradiction to the theory, or an alternative to it.

The fact that all people have their own reaction and theories explaining phenomena, and ways of dealing with them, does not mean they are all the same, or equally valid.
It only means that each individual will face the consequence of his own persepctive's consequences, if applied, or converted to actions.

If person B is protected from the severity of the consequences of his theory's, or perspective's errors, he may become convinced that his own theory is just as accurate as any other's

Each perspective, each subjective interpretation of world, has consequences - good & bad.
The 'bad' ones indicate the perspective's inaccuracy.
Since absolute accurate is impossible in a world of fluctuating interactivity, accuracy is measured by the degree of foreseen benefits realized...just as strength is a measure of weakness, and gnosis is a measure of ignorance.
Therefore good/bad is not a moral judgment, but a cost/benefit judgment.

Each actor, every individual, evaluates the fluctuating circumstances in real-time, constructing multiple judgments per circumstance.
if the judgment is applied, and is not withheld and kept as an abstraction remaining untested and therefore perfect as an abstraction, then the degree of cost/benefits will expose the mind's quality of judgment.

A negative judgment is not automatically an indication of a desire.
If Person A judges a circumstance, in relation to Person B, in a manner which for Person B is negative towards his own interests, and contrary to his judgments, this does not immediately indicate a negative motive.

The negativity of Person A's judgment may indicate a motive in relation to Person B, but this is not necessarily so in all instances.
Person A may be indifferent to Person B's desires, but this is not the same as being negatively inclined to them.

The accusation of motive is often a product of a confusion between empathy and sympathy.
If Person B is unable to judge unemotionally, without taking his self-interests as a factor, he will perceive all judgments as reflections of his own incapacity to exclude himself from his judgments.
He will perceive a negative emotion, a negative intent, in any judgment that contradicts his own, which are founded on emotions and self-interests.
Unable to comprehend other, empathize with him, he will sympathize, projecting his own anger, and hatred.
His own emotions will become externalized as belonging to the incomprehensible other.
His own pathos will be reflected back to him.

A declarative statement, with no accompanying evidence, arguments, reasoning, is not an expression of what is real, but only an expression of what the individual hopes, or wishes, were real.
It often exposes the secret longings of the actor, as he is attempting to created a desirable image of himself, in the minds of others.

It usually indicates a feeble mind/psyche, desperate to be seen in a particular way by others - social dependency.
Severe social dependency indicates vulnerability, seeking comfort, or protection in others, or in the group.

The direction the declarative, self-aggrandizing, statements take will clarify the source of the insecurity.
If simple, the directions will be clear.
In more complex minds the direction will take indirect routes to hide the source of its vulnerability.
In such cases multiple experiences will help the diagnostician triangulate, and pinpoint the vulnerability, because no matter how complex the route all will gravitate around a central theme - exposing a pattern.

A judgment may be about what is immediate, based on what is present - concerning present interactions - or it may be a judgment based on the present, and on precedent, projected as a hypothesis.
The first type of judgment is called superficial, or shallow in perspective.
The second type of judgment is possible in proportion to the quality of the brain at work.
Simple brains are unable to construct such judgments to the degree more complex brains can - the difference between the human animal, and all the other species.

The usage of precedent (knowledge, experience), in relation to the immediate, the present, is a pool of data (information, patterns) with which the mind can attempt to predict future events, to prepare and to focus energies, multiplying the organism's effect.
The organism seeks pattern in the patterns, further honing its perspective, to outperform others.
This is not a guarantee of the projections success, if we include randomness (chaos), and the fact that the absence of absolutes means one's judgment can only be superior, not perfect - stronger, not omnipotent, more knowledgeable, precedent based, not omniscient.

Cost/Benefit exposes the judgment's quality.

Person B may confuse his own motives, for those of Person A, when judging the same events, the same phenomena, the same interactions.
Basing itself on this assumption it will evaluate Person A as failing or succeeding, confusing its own motive (objective) as belonging to Person A, and thusly evaluating cost/benefits in relation to his own objectives.

All perspectives are reactions to reality.
Therefore, success/failure exposes the quality of the reaction.

If application is impossible, or undesirable, then all perspectives can only be evaluated in relation to each other, and to a common objective.
In such cases two ideas are juxtaposed and judged on the merit of their evidence, arguments, and reasoning, as these relate to world, and to precedent.
Objectives, along with judgments can be evaluated in the same way, because objectives are founded on judgments.

Person A has a theory.
Person B has a theory.
Both theories explaining, judging the same phenomena.
Best method is application, exposing quality through cost/benefits.
Second best is by juxtaposing both theories with each other, before the phenomenon being judged.

Juxtaposition of theory A with theory B, as they relate to the phenomenon being judged, exposes the superior from the inferior before either is applied into practice.

Objectives, also called motives, ideals, can be judged just as judgments can be judged...using cost/benefit.

Person A wants to fly using mechanical help.
Person B wants to fly using no mechanical help.

Both have a theory to realize their wants.
Both are convinced.
Each has his own opinion, based on the quality of his perspective, of an indifferent, to both, world.

Applying subjective judgments within an indifferent world, separates the more objective mind from the mind immersed in its own subjectivity.

Person B may never apply his judgment, intuitively feeling insecure, uncertain, about his own quality of judgment.
He can then claim superior judgment over Person A who does apply his judgment, and adjusts it, according to his failures.
In theory a judgment remain unsoiled - perfect.
Person B may demand protective reassurances, from others, because he feels insecure about the quality of his own judgments, wanting others to step in and reduce the burden of the potential costs. He will seek, in others, a mitigating force, to protect him from his poor judgment - he will compromise his potential benefits, by reassuring himself that he will not bear the full effect of the potential costs.

If Person B is unable to contradict Person A's theory, or offer an alternative to it, he will accuse Person A of an ulterior motive, if the theory is negative to Person B's own motives and self-interests.
He will try to make Person A the source of what is contrary to his own theory, so as to have someone to blame for all his failings and his liability to put into practice his own theory, or his own inability to provide a better alternative.
In this way, Person B will evade his won judgment's inferiority, and his own accountability, by using Person A as the source of his own inadequacies, preserving the hope that if he simply remain unconvinced, or rejects Person A's negative to his own motives, perspective, he preserves the possibility of his own judgments success.
Using a 'negative' as a 'positive' he will denounce any perspective he cannot challenge, or replace, implying that his own is equally plausible.
Person B may simply reject any theory he cannot challenge and is negative towards his own motives, thinking that the act itself constitutes a pushing away of what is described - that if he only disagrees he will make Person A's theory less real.

The method is based no the delusion that all is equal, and so all theories are equally valid, because they are all imperfect, and subjective interpretations of world.
Person B, afraid that Person a may be right, cannot lend validation to the theory he cannot defeat, nor accept, without going mad, or risking his own welfare.
By not validating a position he convinces himself that he makes it less plausible.
This delusion can be extended into the psychosis that convinces itself that if it gathers enough minds to reject a hypothesis then what is described in the hypothesis ceases to apply to those participating in this mass rejection.
Popularity becomes a self-validating psychosis, of mass denial and delusion.

Any negative consequences, or costs, can now be explained as the product of those who refuse to participate in the mass self-delusion - evil.
If only all lend credence to the mass deception then it can be true - as if world changes in accordance to human desires, hopes, and mental games...or adapts to human fashions, trends, and cultural ideals.
The participators never question their own judgments, since each validates, for the other, the shared 'truth'.
Any unforeseen, negative repercussion, can now be blamed on those who refuse to participate.

Collective madness.

A perfectly deterministic world is impossible due to two factors:
1- All is in constant flux.
Constantly interacting, affecting and being affected in turn.
With every interaction a slight modification occurs.
2- Not all energies are patterned, ordered, but some lack all pattern - random.
Chaos, in relation to ordering, is what inhibits a perfect, deterministic, existence.

When discussing order, placing it in categories we call types, kinds, species, breeds, races, sexes, etc. we are discussing potentials
Potentials can be fully realized or, as with most cases, only partially realized.

Inherited potential determines the extent a specific trait can develop.
This sum of all nurturing we call nature, is not ended.
It continues to interact within the environment it finds itself within, determining how much and in what way, its inherited potentials will be cultivated, realized.

Replication is when and how an organism slightly modifies.
Even if we were to replicate, clone, an organism, as when cells divide, the product would not be an exact replicate, due to environmental affects upon it during the process of replication.
A clone is never an absolutely exact copy of the original.

Replication does not only occur during reproduction but is an ongoing process.
During the lifetime of an organism it will replace every cell in its body many times over, and with every replacement a slight modification will occur, slightly changing its inherited potential.
This modification may have a negative, or a positive affect upon it, in relation to a world in constant flux.
Although the organism is never the same as it was at the time of its birth, it is neither completely different.
Modification is a matter of degree, because an extreme genetic modification would mean death.

Accumulated modifications, mutations, are then passed on to the next generation, slightly altering the potentials being passed on - evolution.

Dialogue, with a degenerate, is worthless.
For him dialogue is not a means towards an end, towards a resolution, a superior hypothesis, but it is an end in itself.
A degenerate considers dialogue a continuing negotiation over the terms and conditions of his existence.
He pleads, threatens, tries to reason himself to a desired outcome, and when he fails he cannot stop renegotiating.
If not with God, then with humanity, the power of dialogue, is found in its continuing escape from a resolution.
Therefore, if he refuses to stop debating race, race ceases to exist, as dialogue prohibits a final conclusion.
Magical power of words, retaining existence in a state of undecided, undetermined, limbo.
The degenerates convinces himself that if he does not agree to the terms and conditions being negotiated, then he is free from the negative effects being presented, in the form of symbols/words.
The degenerate believes that his agreement is a necessary aspect of the conditions he is affected by. He is convinced that his word means something.

Degenerates want to believe that the past is overcome, that it has minimal, if any, affect upon them in the present.
if they want to pretend they are being rational they will give the nature/nurture divide a 50/50 percentile, implying that centuries of natural selection, of environmental and social nurturing, is usurped with less than a lifetime of conditioning.
In this delusion, the minds ability to learn and imitate, behavior, to adapt to circumstances, feeds into their delusion that the past is erased.
They dress up the naked body, and forget of tis primal presence - they cover the genitals and forget they are there.
They cover intents with words, and believe that the words overpower the underlying, hidden, primal intents.

Degenerates do not abhor judgments, they abhor evaluating potentials, probabilities.
Their own lack of ability, in this regard, forces them to discredit evaluation.
Furthermore, for them judgment is restricted to stating the obvious, if and when, it says nothing unflattering, hurtful, about the individual human being evaluated.

In all instances, where degenerates rule, they sought o eradicate tests of competence, of inherited potential, of talent and ability.
In all instances they wanted to preserve their delusions, by implying what they could not rationalize - that all are born with the same potentials, and only differ in the circumstances, the condition and conditioning to bring them forth.
On its own, this implication would make natural selection, and the production of species, impossible.

Their only option is to then imply that with the advent of language, the usage of symbols, nature ceased to apply to the organism that could manipulate signs, to convince itself and others of its kind.

The degenerate defines progress as a kind of regress, and maturation as a form of retardation, a return to a state of infantile naivete, where, under the protective tutelage of an external parental entity, it can play, explore, with carefree abandonment.

Regressing to a prepubescent state, makes sexual identity an exploration role-laying game, where all is still unsettled and full of infinite possibilities.
The parental entity can begin with the usual abstraction of God, then defer to that of the human representative of the priest, then the secular form of the state, and finally, in its final state of regressive progressiveness comfortably settle in the authority of the individuals personal whims - the imaginative power of a child's metaphors, expressed in symbolic combinations.
A child can pretend to be whatever it fantasizes, simply wearing the garment, painting its face, and acting the part.

Retardation on a massive scale.
Retard = from the French en retard for late, behind time.
A mind refusing to grow-up, defining this refusal as part of its adult right.
Retard, as in to not attain one's full inherited potential.
To remain behind, in cultivating self, where 'self' refers to the sum of all interactions, nurturing, that made it possible.
Appearance as the past manifesting as presence.
Ego as the awareness of self - know thyself. That which knows self - self-conscious.
Can identify self in the continuing interactivity of flux - discriminate, distinguish.

Heterosexual Reproduction = sex.
Heterosexual Copulation = the act of fertilizing the ovum, with sperm, usually involving a degree of intrusiveness necessitating the evolution of specific psychologies to deal with the fight/flight mechanisms, and with anxiety/fear as its trigger - reduction of stress, where stress is the accumulation of energies in preparation for the fight/flight mechanism.
Specialization = male/female.
Sexual traits evolving to facilitate specialized reproductive role - physical and mental, traits categorized as masculine/feminine.
Gender = application of biological specialized reproduction types within a specific culture - Gene to Meme.

Paraphilia = genetic or memetic effects mutating the function of sex and sexual types.
Aberrant sexual behaviour can be due to environmental conditions, such as a lack of mates, or the adaptation of sexual aggression as a form of hierarchy display - stress relief reducing internal strife.
Sheltering increases genetic mutations that would have bee naturally culled out of a population - unfitness.
These slowly accumulate, compounding their effect.

Nihilism = inversion of all naturally evolving types, functions, processes, replacing them with manmade ones, based on an artifice, an abstraction, an ideology lacking all references outside human brains.
Nihilism propagates, like all viruses, by masking as being part of the host, by invading the host through its weakest point and then hijacking its functions eventually killing the host completing the virus' life-cycle at which time the virus returns to stasis = see parasites such as the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] or the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
Viruses, like all threatening dis-eases, flourish in overpopulated environments, and in dirt, garbage, pollution.

Memetic viruses propagate using symbols - code, words, numbers. They "exist" as ideas/ideals, affecting evolved behavior, such as sexual.
Nihilistic viruses, or Memetic Dis-ease, has no reference outside brains. The infected organism is placed in a state of insanity, confusion, madness.
Symptoms involve a detachment from reality, a denial of the senses, the usage of words to confuse self, or to deny a world experienced sensually.
Words begin losing their attachment to external behaviors, such as the words 'sex', or 'male/female' and become theoretical, ideas.
Other such words are: morality, race, human etc.
Similar to ants infected by the 'zombie fungus' the organism becomes erratic, confused, it behaves in ways contrary to its nature, to its self-interests.
Humans begin living in alternate realities, words cease to connect to anything outside their minds, behavior reverts to a state of childishness (retardation), words no longer refer to anything real, but are theoretical,a abstractions, magical.
A virus dependent on mind to mind infection would value popularity, being a part of a large collective, being in the center of a group, the center of attention; it's main objective is proselytizing, infecting, as many others as possible.
Unable to survive without a host, it seeks out new converts, a group to belong to.
It's thinking has no basis in reality, it projects the virus's internal psychosis as a collective - zombification.

Concepts as basic as race, sex, self, will, etc, are wilfully obfuscated, while more complex concepts are easily simplified and accepted.
Victimhood is used as an argument, attracting feebleness as part of the viral cycle of propagation.

After the 'normalization' of transexuality, the next sexual dysfunction to be normalized will be paedophilia.
They already have the narrative, the victim and prejudice hook, in consent and ageism.
The  non-violent nature of sexual intercourse is established, even if contradicted with attitudes concerning 'rape'.
The issue is consent, as it will be when paedophilia becomes he next class of victimhood.

After that it will be about bestiality.
Consent will be argued from the vantage point of species prejudices, using the same arguments once used against races.
The tricky part ill have to do with consciousness, and how one gives consent using a language other than a manmade one.
Pets will marry, lawfully, their owners, and will inherit his wealth after death.
Speciesm will be the new 'racism'. Prejudiced against living being, based on appearances.
animal holocaust, the abuse enacted against other species, over the centuries, will be another source of guilt to be 'corrected'.

All other sexual deviant identities have more to do with fetishes, already covered by the laws concerning privacy.
Degeneracy goes mainstream.

As for necrophiliacs....consent will be argued as the right of the deceased to voluntarily offer his/her cadaver to his 'loved one', or perhaps after a contract is signed - a market will be produced for bodies.
Economic transactions will transfer the corpse to the purchaser, after death....making murder motivated by desire, after death, a new theme for the movie industry.  
Eventually some arrangement will be made where the buyer of a cadaver could use the body as part of his daily routines - driving with it, rolling in on some device...the body chemically treated to remain pliable and to not rot.
Necrophiliac couples, man and his lover-corpse, will be part of the everyday.
In bars, in restaurants, in weddings, all dressed up...in black.
The "rights" of the living will be stretched to include the after-life.
Perhaps a further fetish will evolve where not the entire body but parts of it will become accessories.
Vaginas and penises, as usable jewelry - heads in a vat etc.
Court battles over how much of the dead can be preserve for the necrophiliac to gain the right to declare it on his income taxes, or to bring it out in public.

Language, of course, will have to be adjusted so that nobody is ever offended.
New words blurring the contradiction of death/life, or old ones used in new ways, will become commonplace.
Philosophies rewritten to accommodate the socioeconomic shift.

The ground has already been laid by Nihilists.
Profound sounding explanations about how life/death is a synthesis, and how all is alive...rocks, clouds, water...and/or all is actually dead....a world of the walking dead.
Abrahamism, as the nihilistic faiths worship death, will be renamed and repackaged....and rejuvenated.
Language will become liquid, to the point where language will be uniform, but communication difficult.
An institutional language, probably a form of English, will become standard, with lingo splintering-off into particular clique semiologies.
Dress, diet, will vary.

The distance between private and public man, personae and character, will widen.
Social interaction will become a necessary distraction from private worlds, each with its own rituals, language, principles.
An ordering of endless cults.
Machines will deal with reality, permitting man to live in his personal uni-verse.
Maintaining the machinery will only require specialized knowledge, with no broader picture - each machine part replaced, or fixed, without any understanding of the entirety.
Co-Depedency will reach an apex.
Philosophy will cease to matter, as there will be no shared language, and no acceptable objective reality to discuss.
Except for a common language, all language will become specialized, unable to communicate concepts to minds not part of the clique.

The entire premise of detachment from reality presupposes an external safety.
The Nihilistic structure cannot survive in a world where there remains at least one mind not assimilated into its premises - it is vulnerable to reality, but machines will not be able to deal with any threat exceeding their intelligence, or creativity, without, also, becoming a threat to those enjoying their protection.
Globalization is a requirement for the entire nihilistic system to proceed into a total breech with reality, within which each man will have to potential to become his own god-king.
Competition will remain internal, and on a noetic level when the external world becomes irrelevant.
Feminization will reign.
Conflicts will be over which delusions, which fantasies, offer the most pleasure potential, making them more seductive to a majority.

Language, including what passes for philosophy, will be characterized by insinuating, seductive qualities - and how vague it remains, permitting different minds to project into it their open specific psychosis..it will become political, idealism.
Ideas will be judged by how it offers inspiration to the many, excluding as few as possible - popularity.

Language has already shifted into feminine word-games, and malleable ambiguities, using words specifically chosen to trigger sensations, emotions, feelings.
This will increase as machinery begins to create a shell separating man from world - mechanical world - artificial reality.
Language is, and will continue to reflect this detachment, this indifference to the real world.
Language not representing world, but world representing language - art.

The more imaginative, creative, will seduce those lacking, into a private, noetic space/time.
Syntax, vocabulary, grammar, will adjust to the specific type of pseudo-reality being manufactured.
Multi-verses, connected to a unifying abstraction.
Gods as creators-artists, selling a product to those that cannot create on their own.

Degenerates, calling themselves leftists, revolutionaries, humanitarians, egalitarians, or any other kind of bullcrap, woke up to the realization that their ideals and ideologies were a pile of steaming shit.....theoretical, hypothetical, feel-good, childishness that could not be applied in the real world.

Some, realizing them felt ti as some kind of epiphany, a form of coming of age, of them growing up out of their childishness into mature reasoning.
But instead of admitting they were idiots, and naive imbeciles, what do they do, to cover their own mistakes in judgment?
They want to tear ALL ideals down, by accusing them ALL, of being as naive and idiotic as the ones they once held to be the coming Utopia, the enlightenment of mankind, that will save all of US, from wicked nature, and create a humanistic world where nobody suffered, nobody was insulted, hurt, or degraded.

unable to accept the idiocy of the ideas and ideals that seduced them, into their adult years, they want to accuse ALL of being as idiotic and stupid as they once were.
Their "maturity' consists in tearing down all ideologies, and all philosophies, that do not take into account the specific feelings of the individual, who being a retard, suffers the consequences of this genetic inherited inferiority.

These hypocrites and cowards admit that they were 'once' naive and wrong, but now they are 'right' in condemning not only their own but ALL judgments, because if they could not be intelligent and brave enough to see, then nobody is, or ought to be.

They've 'matured\ from 'positive Nihilism' opt pure, or authentic Nihilism, which is an advancement form believing in naive bullshit, to believing all should be torn down, and all must start over from NIL.
Decades of struggles and debates and blood sweat and tears, have all gone to waste...and the naive now awakening Nihilist cannot stomach all that wasted time and energy...so he must avenge himself, and make all waste their time and energies...because he cannot turn back time and scold that idiot he once was, and still is, so instead he will reduce all humanity down to his idiocy.


What these types do is slander all philosophy, and the ideals and ideas contained within them...all language, all applications of words.....because if he does not his own retardation and inferior genes would be unbearable.
He would have to, like Weninger, and Heisman, commit suicide, to deal with the shame.

Imagine a moron, living a life of high minded errors, convinced he was doing god's work, or he was advancing mankind, realizing that his entire life was based on a flaw, on a mistake.
How could he recuperate after such an awakening?
He would have to turn lemons into lemonade with a bit of sugary lying.
He would become an anti-idealist, to repair the damage done by his retarded, childish, ideology.
His Nihilism would go from one end of the spectrum to the reverse, in the binary dualistic paradigm of Nihilism.
When his naive, fabricated, theoretical ideologies proved infantile, he would have to go the other way and ease, destroy, all ideologies.
When God had been proven to be a hoax, then the opposite, an absence of all order, was embraced.
From absolute ONE, to absolute NIL.
From 1 to 0.
Either/Or.
One abstraction with no basis in reality, to the other abstraction with no basis in reality.


If man, all of humanity, cannot be saved, then nobody ought to be allowed to survive.
in reality it was himself the hypocrite always wanted to save, and not humanity. Humanity was a pretext to hide his selfishness, because his previous ideology had made him ashamed of being egotistical.
If philosophy, as it was practiced by morons, could not offer a solution to a non-problem, then nobody would be permitted to use philosophy to guide his actions, and to clarify his judgments.
If judgment had proven insufficient for him then it ought to be so for everyone.

The same idiotic, hypocritical pseudo-intellectual motives that seduced him to the positive nihilistic ideologies, like Christianity, and Marxism, and Transhumanism, and so on, would carry him through to the shameless selfishness of shame, wanting to reduce all to his level, proving, once more, that Nihilism attracts the desperate, and the needy into its ranks, and binds them with a shared, but never stated openly, secret...a lie.
Who was indoctrinated by Christianity from early on, and up until now....the desperate, the downtrodden, the hypocrites, the lowly of the low....saving mankind was a pretext, a pretense.
Who was convinced by Marxism?
The desperate, the needy, the lowly of the low....the ones who pretended to care for the poor and the hungry, when it was their own stomachs and vengeance they wanted to feed.

And now....these same degenerates attempt to level it all down, so that their own lies and squandered lives would not be so embarrassing to them...in secret...in the sub-conscious where the body cannot lie, as the mind could, and did.

This is what this [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] looks like:


A war on pronouns, nouns, the application of words...it is a war on words, using words.
disarming words, making them meaningless except as political, ideological tools.
This is WAR!! on European males.
This is the infection, the memetic virus on display.
This is degeneracy, spreading, becoming normal, cool, fashionable, popular.

This how words are detached from reality, and made into noetic nothings - gadgets, little trinkets, fashion accessories.  

This is a virus of the mind, spreading using symbols, words, producing insanity: a variety of freaks, psychotics, feeble victims finding power in symbols, in clothes, music, in scratches and letters.
This is mental castration- emasculation through the mind, suing the nervous system.

I've been talking about this 'war like no other' this nihilistic dis-ease, which we for historical reasons have come to associate with Judaism, and its offspring Christianity and Islam, and then its secularization, as Marxism, and Trashumanism.

Well, this is a real-life, down to earth, example of this memetic war, and on what level it is fought, and what is at stake.

This is what I've been talking about for close to a decade now.
This is what I mean by words being detached from their references in world, or noumena disconnecting from phenomena, and being attached to other noumena, or emotions, or sensations, or...ABSTRACTIONS, commonly referred to as esoteric.

I'm, not inventing this stuff, I'm reporting on it...I am diagnosing a dis-ease, a memetic virus, that is ancient, and is currently surging, gaining vigour, as it has many times in the past.
A virus that hibernates in human minds, and then emerges when a culture declines.
Crazies emerging, as if they came out of nowhere - coming out of closets.

Like the parasites I used, this mental parasite, hijacks human minds...or minds that use symbols, and words.
It is felts as a surge of vigour...a release from the contains of natural order, an escape from a determined and determining past.
It is felt as empowerment because the feeble can simply use words to declare anything, and if they convince enough weaklings they feel that their words are magical, powerful tools.

This is a dis-ease the infects the feeble-minded, the psychotic, the psychologically impoverished, the lost, the needy and desperate, the ill.

A collection of common tactics used by degenerates, out of desperation and cowardice.

This method involves the usage of obscure intellectuals, or not so well-known figures, to imply association.
Using the myth that what is rare is also of great value.
This tactic name-drops some figure to imply superiority, gambling on the opponents ignorance, his unwillingness to look into the figure, or lacking the time/energy to read-up on the figure's positions.
This is usually used by desperate degenerates who cannot use famous figures owning to the fact that there their own stupidity will become obvious, whereas with the obscure figure there's a chance of getting away with the pretense.

Application:
"You guys are still on Plato and Nietzsche? I read them when I was in high-school. I've advanced into more current intellectuals like Mutaran, Gellner".
"Your positions have been usurped by more current philosophers."

Failure:
The degenerate fails to consider the fact that knowing something superior, even if it is not your own creation, will be displayed in your performance.
fro example, the one who has read Nietzsche and truly understood him, will become a spokesperson for Nietzsche's genius, and will expose all opposition positions as weak, whereas a lying cowardly degenerate who may have read Nietzsche but has understood nothing, can only defer to him, hoping the opposition has not read nor understood, or will be intimidated by the mere mention of the name.
Any famous intellectual will do, or, most likely, any not so famous intellectual will do best.

The tactic of feigning superiority, or maturity, as a pretext for not responding, or not proving your declarations.
A rather infantile method, ironically using maturity as an excuse.
Condescending without displaying. It deals a double blow: first it evades a fight that the degenerate fears he cannot win, and the second is that he insinuates his superiority without having to prove it.

Application:
"This is all too tediously childish. I'm too mature to get involved. I went through this in grade-school".
"I would prove it but i cannot be bothered. I'm too adult to get involved in kid stuff."

Failure:
Method fails because the ones usually using it participate in communities where particular kinds of people congregate and usually in a very infantile way.
The degenerate contradicts his words with his presence, or contradicts his earlier performances with his most recent evasions.

The degenerate will ignore the topic altogether and focus his attacks on the individual, casting aspersions, doubt, remarking no his hypothetical motives, tactics, personality etc.  
If reciprocated the degenerate will cry and complain about ad hom attacks, calling for help from any authorities.
Unable to challenge the positions of the opponent, such cowards and hypocrites hope that by attacking the messenger, the thinker, the message, the thoughts, are also discredited.
This is a vindictive, resentful, attack by cowards and hypocrites, trying to impress the masses, as if majority votes prove a theory, a hypothesis, wrong.


Application:
"Darwin was into bestiality. That's why he was obsessed with animals."
"Einstein was a bad father, who rarely bathed. I'm surprised people still believe in his views."
"You're a fascist, and afraid of homosexuals and women, and black people, and everything different."  

Failure:
Degenerate fails to realize that even if you kill the idealist the ideal does not die, especially if the ideas are about a reality, a world, that has existed before life, or the human species evolved, and will continue after it is gone.  
What lives on, is the cowards, the hypocrites performance, exposing a petty, desperate, spirit, that will linger on in memory for decades after his/her death.

A classic method used by degenerates the world over, for many decades.
This tactic usually comes when the degenerate senses defeat and does not want to admit it, or to expose himself as vanquished.
Such a desperate pathetic individual convinces himself that the only reason he is even participating in the discussion is because it amuses him.
Here humour, laughter, is used as a stress-relief, ridding the degenerate of nervous energies.
This is one of the simplest methods, and it has become popular among simpletons the world over.
When performed face-to-face it is usually accompanied by forced laughter, patronizing, dismissive, and totally fake.

Application:
"The only reason I am humoring you is because you entertain me."
"I come here, daily, for a good laugh."

Failure:
The method fails because it usually comes after a long period of debate, when it begins to realize it is outmatched and is looking for an exist plan, that will also save him his ego from ridicule.
The degenerate may take on the air of detached cynic, but his presence and his reactions contradict his ploy of amusement.
Amusement is the excuse he gives himself to hide his vindictive obsession.
Unable to deal with a superior other, it attempts to mock, slandering him in the eyes of non-participating observers.
It's a way of saving the ego the pain of being exposed as inadequate.

Another classic and very popular one among the simpler, the more child-like, infantile degenerates.
It usually involves a declaration of victory, when the degenerate realizes he is outmatched, and all the other methods have failed to produce the expected results.
So, it usually comes as a last resort, after the other methods have already been applied and have failed.

This is a rather immature method of taunting, with a victory dance.
later, the same degenerate may go for the 'evasions of maturity' method, hoping the audience has forgotten his past performances.
The method relies on the psychological factor of first-impressions, or of repetition, which only the lowest minds are ever affected by - so the degenerate's target audience are degenerates like himself.

Application:
"Despite your best efforts I find you easy to deal with."
"Is it a coincidence that I win without trying?"


Failure:
Belief in the delusion that all is subjective, makes this pathetic method even more self-contradicting, because by declaring, stating, believing, one has vanquished his opponent, one exposes how non subjective all value judgments are.
The consequences of the victory declarations are usually those of a loser, so it doesn't really matter How convinced he is that his declared victory is fact, or how many he can convince, hoping his victimhood will find altruistic effects in others, what matter is how his declared victory will affect the world, at large.
So a moron declaring victory over someone who believes in Evolution, really does nothing about how nature works, but only condemns him to a lifetime of idiocy - hopefully protected by a system that thrives on imbeciles.

This one is used on-line, or it can be used face-to-face with a slight modification where one, the degenerate in this case, pretends to believe things other than what he truly believes.
On-Line it becomes a method of altering avatars, monikers etc.
The degenerate believes that if he fools a mind more intelligent than its own, that his inability to compete with it directly and honestly is compensated with its foolish duplicity.
Tricking other, on-line is easier than off-line, particularly when registrations can be shared, and the medium only allows symbols, language, as a method of exposing mind.
The same degenerates off-line are incompetent, unable to fool anyone above the age of ten, because tone, movement, body language all the intangible and tangible modes of communicating essence are in play and not so easily controlled.

Application:
"You claim to be smart buy you couldn't tell it was me behind that other moniker."
"I've managed to trick you consistently, despite your superior intelligence. Explain that.""

Failure:
Degenerate fails to realize that one can pretend to be dumber, but not smarter than what one is....at least effectively.
Fooling the opponent does not make its degenerate retardation go away, it actually accentuates it, by acknowledging that it is unable to compete honestly, and must resort to kid games to save its self-esteem from total ruin.
The degenerate also fails to realize that even under the most ideal circumstances, such as on-line environments, the essence of the individual cannot be held back, that it is only a matter of time before the degenerate exposes himself, his essence, even if his name is not known.
Because if you are a degenerate, coward, hypocrite and imbecile, it does not matter if your name is John, or Tim, or Bob, just as it does not matter what you calla rose.
A moron is a moron I a moron, and no matter how many monikers and avatars he changes he remains the same moron.