Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalFAQMemberlistSearchRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 Abrahamism

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
AuthorMessage
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Thu Jun 28, 2018 7:21 am



"Noble lie" is Nihilism.
Worshipping the mind, as creator of world.
This 'Divine mind', this god, can be externalized, as the Abrahamics did, or made a private power, subjectivity - creator of worlds.
Sanctification, as I've defined it, is this converting of phenomena into noetic constructs (abstraction) - detaching the idea(l) from the real.
Platonism is what merged with Judaism to produce Christianity.
When we say Hellenism, we refer to Platonism, and then we dress it up with rituals and Hellenic symbols to imply that Christianity is a continuation of Hellenism.
The Pantheon is converted to the Saints. Heroes are converted to great Abrahamic sages. Pagan rituals, and sacrifice, are converted to Christian ones.
Hellenism is corrupted by a contrary Asian meme.
We get a hint of it in the mentioning of Zalmoxis put in the mouth of Socrates.
Socrates is Plato's avatar, using modern concepts.
Partly a real person, partly a projection of Plato himself - a proxy.
'The Lie' is meant to appease the mediocre, allowing social harmony and civilization to proceed.
The real world can only be endured by 'monsters and philosophers'...some of which go mad, make great personal sacrifices and suffer greatly their own awareness.
The masses need a 'lie' noble or not, to protect them form a reality they cannot endure - a poetry, a narrative that implies but does not clarify.
Without it they would go mad.

Art is now exposed as a means of protecting but also manipulating the average mind - its tragic and comedic essence.
Through art, and fArt, the mediocre masses can be controlled, their beliefs shaped, their consent ensured.
The manipulator will always use proxies, like Plato - artistic characters, avatars: front-men.
Currently it is the Black man who serves this role - through them European man is corrupted, his culture eroded and his youth seduced and degraded.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
OnWithTheirHead
hero
avatar

Gender : Male Posts : 609
Join date : 2017-01-05
Location : .

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Thu Jun 28, 2018 8:18 am

Satyr wrote:

The real world can only be endured by 'monsters and philosophers'...some of which go mad, make great personal sacrifices and suffer greatly their own awareness.
The masses need a 'lie' noble or not, to protect them form a reality they cannot endure - a poetry, a narrative that implies but does not clarify.
Without it they would go mad.

I disagree. See my thread called 'rules' in it is contained a video about narcissist Yahweh.

Women are naturally attracted to some narcissist qualities, a self-pride, confidence, and humorous comical narcissism. But Yahweh's narcissism is extreme, toxic, evil. Being raised Christian is akin to being raised by a pedophile, or raised an abused child. You are told you will be tortured for eternity for merely thinking thoughts.

I think Christianity does not save others from madness, but is the cause of madness itself.

The Japanese are mostly atheists and seem very sane to me. Religion is not needed. What need is there when you can simply sit and enjoy Cherry Blossoms? Furthermore, reincarnation gives people hope in an afterlife and better future, religion is not needed to instill hope in the future. Now, Japan is not perfect, they are too sexually frustrated to be considered a healthy nation, but still.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Thu Jun 28, 2018 8:22 am

In the east they have their own versions of the 'noble lie'.
Abrahamism is to Indo-European Spirituality, what Buddhism is to the same.
Each meme has its own nihilism to placate and comfort the average.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Mon Jul 02, 2018 7:23 am


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Mon Jul 02, 2018 2:12 pm



If you follow the clues....it all makes sense.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Mon Jul 02, 2018 7:44 pm

Jones, Michael wrote:
"American Jewish funniness is a form of cultural aggression." James Bloom,
Gravity Fails' February 1969 was a lot like September 1665; the Messiah's arrival was announced among the Jews; mass hysteria followed; the hysteria was, in turn, followed by mass disillusionment. In both instances, the Messianic era was characterized by the breaking of sexual taboos. Sabbetai Zevi liberated the Jews from the law in 1665 by telling them, among other things, they could give free rein to their sexual passions. Everything that was previously forbidden was now allowed. The Jewish Messiah did much the same thing in 1969. His name was Alex Portnoy. "The publication of a book is not often a major event in American culture," Albert Goldman wrote in the February 7, 1969 issue of Life magazine, however, now

every shepherd of public opinion, every magus of criticism is wending his way toward its site. Gathered at an old New York City inn called Random House, at the stroke of midnight on the 21st of February in this 5729th year since the creation of the world, they will hail the birth of a new American hero, Alexander
Portnoy. A savior and scapegoat of the ', Portnoy is destined at the Christological age of 33 to take upon himself all the sins of sexually obsessed modern man and expiate them in a tragi-comic crucifixion. The gospel that records the passion of this mock messiah is a slender, psychotic novel by Philip Roth called Portnoy's Complaint ... it is being hailed as the book of the present decade and as an American masterwork in the tradition of Huckleberry Finn. Portnoy's Complaint was also portrayed as something more sinister than Huckleberry Finn.
One reviewer compared the binding and cutting of the books pages to "the secret cutting of heroin for injection into the national veins.'"

But why was Portnoy hailed as the Messiah? Because, like Shabbetai Zevi, he had come to liberate Jews from the moral law. Then Jews could act as missionaries to the Gentiles, as the chosen people, as the revolutionary avant garde, etc. Portnoy's Complaint is a 270-page monologue on a psychiatrist's couch. Portnoy's first task is to liberate himself from the curse of guilt inflicted by his Jewish mother. In the pseudo-psychiatric definition that serves as the book's frontispiece, Portnoy's Complaint is described as "a disorder in which strongly-felt ethical and altruistic impulses are perpetually warring with extreme sexual longings, often of a perverse nature.'' The problem is the patient's inability to achieve personal integrity by aligning passion with reason: "as a consequence of the patient's 'morality,' however, neither fantasy nor act issues in genuine sexual gratification.'

-------
Portnoy's Complaint caused Jews severe discomfort because it asked what it meant to be a Jew, an unresolved question raised with monotonous regularity.
Gershom Scholem, author of a magnum opus on Sabbetai Sevi, said Portnoy's Complaint was "the book for which all anti-Semites have been praying." Portnoy was, he said, "worse than the Protocols of the Elders of Zion"" because it was the testimony of a Jew.
An unspoken part of the animus against Roth on the part of the Jews who disliked his book was the accusation that he was, in some sense of the word, a bad Jew because he had brought disrepute on the Jewish people. Trude Weiss-Rosmarin claimed Roth spoke "for a certain segment of alienated Jewishly ignorant Jews who write and teach.'' To claim Roth was a bad Jew, his accusers needed to define what a good Jew was, and that got them in trouble. Gershom Scholem was hoist on his own petard when he claimed there was nothing normative-i.e., no religious litmus test-to define a Jew. If Scholem defined a Jew as someone sincerely believing he was a Jew, he could hardly accuse Roth of being a bad Jew. According to Scholem's definition, Portnoy was as much a Jew as Moses Maimonides or Sabbetai Zevi.

----------
And what did the Jewish savior look like in 1969? A lot like a shvartze, the sexually liberated Negro promoted as the paradigm of sexual liberation. Portnoy's praise of shikses sounds like Eldridge Cleaver's effusions about white women and their dirty underwear in Soul on Ice. Sexual attraction was inextricably fused with aggression. Cleaver's aggression was expressed in rape. "Rape," said Cleaver, "was an insurrectionary act." By raping white women, Cleaver "was defying and trampling upon the white man's law, upon his system of values, and ... defiling his woman."
Whether Jews like Roth got the idea of defiling shikses from blacks like Cleaver or vice versa is difficult to say. Soul on Ice appeared in 1968 one year before Portnoy's Complaint, so maybe Roth got the idea of Portnoy, or at least the idea of defiling shikses from Cleaver, or maybe both were the product of the influence of Wilhelm Reich on Manhattan and, therefore, on the publishing industry at the time.
In keeping with the rebirth of Reichian thought in 1969, both the Jewish revolutionary and the Negro revolutionary were above all else, sexual revolutionaries. But whereas Cleaver specialized in rape, Portnoy specialized in seduction. The difference is essentially ethnic. The former relies on brute force, the latter on manipulation. In order to truly corrupt the goyim, their "morality," and their women, the shiksa has to collaborate in her own defilement, something that doesn't happen in the case of rape. The best way to accomplish this is repeated incantation of the word "liberation." Like Sabbetai Zevi, the paradigm of every Jewish Messiah since the time of Christ, Portnoy was going to liberate the shikses by seducing them. He was their Jewish savior, come to save dumb goyim from the inanities of their culture. Cleaver discovered in white folk "an irresistible urge-to just stand up and shake the ice and cancer out of their alienated white asses," and discovered in that desire the reason for the popularity of the "Hula Hoop and the '!Wist," which "offered socially acceptable ways to do it.'''
Portnoy's Complaint offered the Jewish version of the same thing. The stupid shikses have to be saved in spite of themselves, and Portnoy is going to save them by unleashing libido from the bonds of icy Christian morality. Or "morality," as Portnoy/Roth would put it. Portnoy will be the Jewish Messiah for the new postChristian dispensation. The new Jewish savior came "To save the stupid shikse; to rid her of her race's ignorance; to make this daughter ofthe heartless oppressor a student of suffering and oppression; to teach her to be compassionate, to bleed a little for the world's sorrows."' And if the Jewish messiah could get laid liberating shikses, all the better. The defilement was more complete and more pleasurable.
Together, Portnoy and his girlfriend, the miner's daughter from West Virginia whom he calls The Monkey, make "the perfect couple: she puts the id back in Yid, I put the oy back in goy.

To define the shiksa, Roth must first define the Jew, this immediately gets him in trouble. Since the goyim, in Roth's view, are Christian, the Jew must be the antithesis of Christianity. Roth defines the Jew as the Semitic Negro, the paradigm of sexual liberation, he turns the Jew into the champion of Dionysian appetite. At this point, Portnoy begins to resembles the Jewish stereotype of Nazi propaganda, something which other Jews, for some reason, found offensive. "Portnoy's lusts for shikses" was, says Alan Cooper, "precisely what the traditional anti-Semite said all Jews felt, what the Aryan accused the would-be-defiling Jew of trying to perpetrate."' Marie Syrkin says something similar

Like Julius Streicher's satanic Jewboy lusting after Aryan maidens, Portnoy seeks blonde shikses .... the dark Jew seeking to defile the fair Nordic is standard stuff ...
. There is little to choose between [Goebbels'] and Roth's interpretation of what animates Portnoy. In both views the Jewish male is not drawn to a particular girl who is gentile, but by a gentile "background" which he must violate sexually.'

Syrkin is, of course, right. In portraying Portnoy's attraction to the shiksa as he does, Roth seems to take his cue from Hitler. Portnoy is a Jew right out of Mein Kampf, but once that fact is established, the reader is left to decipher Roth's motives. "Streicher's and Goebbel's motives," Cooper says, "were clear. But Roth's
purpose in giving these thoughts to Portnoy is the bone of all the critical contention that was emerging.'' The key to understanding Portnoy as savior is to first understand him as the Jewish debunker of Christian myths.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν


Last edited by Satyr on Mon Jul 02, 2018 8:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Mon Jul 02, 2018 7:59 pm

Jones, Michael wrote:
The Roth character is caught between two worlds, one Jewish, the other American. According to the latter, all men are created equal. According to the former, the goyim are sub-human beasts. Roth married a beast; his desire to free himself from someone he mistakenly thought was human accounts for pages of violent and unpleasant rage in his books. Roth's attempt to pass from one ethnic sphere to another accounts for much of the comedy. Roth was involved in the ethnic equivalent of a sex change operation.
Ethnic reversal means that there is something intrinsically funny about the idea of a Jewish cowboy. It's the ethnic equivalent of cross-dressing. Jews weren't in America in significant numbers in the 1870S; those who were here were selling blue jeans, not herding cattle. The cowboy was never really Catholic either. How could a Catholic spend all that time in the saddle somewhere in Texas and fulfill his obligation to go to Mass on Sunday? No, the cowboy was a Protestant American. He didn't have to go to church to be pious. He could commune with God in nature, as he did regularly in the comic strip Rick O'Shay. Like a good Emersonian, he was self-reliant; nature was his church. In the mid-20th century, the cowboy became a symbol for the aspirations of the once dominant Protestant middle class, which was losing cultural ground to Catholics, Jews, and Negroes. Michael Landon, who got his start with the TV cowboy series Bonanza, understood this. He went on to do the Little House on the Prairie, a TV series which extolled American Western Protestant virtues, like self-reliance, keeping your word, hard work, etc.
Turning the cowboy into a Jew is ethnic reversal fraught with comic possibilities. Lenny Bruce did a skit on Yankele, the Jewish cowboy. Leo Kotke released an album, "Ragtime Cowboy Jew," and Kinky Friedman turned the name Bob Wills and the Texas Playboys into Kinky Friedman and the Texas Jewboys. This tradition reached a culmination of sorts in 1974 when Mel Brooks directed Blazing Saddles. Its "humor" puts crude language into the mouths of clergymen and women and all of the other stock characters that made the Western an American morality play. The only funny parts involve ethnic reversal; the best example is when Mel Brooks plays an Indian Chief who speaks Yiddish. "Shvartzes," he says upon finding a Negro family in a covered wagon. Then, in a hilarious send up of the Indian-speaking mumbo jumbo, Brooks discourses in Yiddish about what to do about Negro settlers, finally bidding them leave with COSey gesind."
Compared to Philip Roth, Mel Brooks is relatively benign, but then leukemia is benign when compared to Philip Roth. Cowboy movies might have expired of their own inanition or hyperviolence in the '70S, but Brook's parody expedited the process. IfJews just ridiculed Hollywood cliches, who could fault them? Their movies would still be funny. Yet Jews like Brooks had to push the envelope beyond what the goyim considered decent. One taboo of the Production Code was ridiculing clergy. Brooks takes savage delight in putting filthy language into a clergyman's mouth and then having his Bible shot to pieces as he raises it in prayer. Jews like Brooks took delight in actions deeply offensive to Protestants, for whom sola scriptura was a pillar offaith. In post-Production Code Hollywood, the Jew could ridicule the goyim and their God with impunity.
As America's cultural taboos fell under the blows ofJewish ridicule, the need to ridicule and subvert intensified. With the collapse of the Hollywood production code in 1965, the attacks on manners and the absurdities of movie cliches gave way to attacks on morals, religion, and Christ. Movies, as a result, became progressively
less funny. Behind the Jewish humor one could discern the dim outline of "cultural aggression" -the distillation of that ancestral grievance, the ethnically shared satisfaction of putting one over on the dumb goy. The more the taboos fell, the more cultural aggression became apparent; the more that became apparent, the less funny the gags became.
A good example of how Jewish humor became less funny can be gleaned from its treatment of the Shvartze. Ridicule of the Negro had been a staple of Jewish comedy since Al Jolson put on blackface. It is central to Blazing Saddles, which probably holds a record for a Hollywood film using the word "nigger." It is also integral to David Zucker's Scary Movie 3. By the time Zucker ridicules the Shvartze, however, most cultural taboos have fallen. So Zucker ridicules black funerals.
"Who said this was funny?" I wondered as the corpse of a dead black woman was thrown around a funeral home. Treating a corpse with respect goes back to Antigone, at least in literature.

-----
James Bloom's Gravity Fails: The Comic Jewish Shaping of Modern America points out "American Jewish funniness is a form of cultural aggression" without any sense that the people whose culture was under attack might not find that aggression funny. Like Roth, Bloom puts morals in quotes; like Roth he seems unable
to distinguish between manners and morals. Likewise, he seems incapable of understanding how the cultural aggression overwhelmed the humor. In movies like Scary Movie 3, humor evaporated leaving only the residue of Jewish cultural aggression behind. Firing a shotgun at a picture of Mother Teresa may be David
Zucker's idea of humor, but all that remains after the long tasteless skit is the taste of cultural aggression-one more Jew making one more attack on goyische illusions, like thinking it is meritorious to take care of the poor in Calcutta.
Bloom correctly sees Mad magazine within the tradition of Jewish humor as cultural aggression, but ignores Mad's ridicule of the tropes of Madison Avenue before it discovered the sexual revolution and blasphemy, whereupon it stopped being funny. Even though the Torah is a book about limits, there was something
intrinsically Jewish about the inability to recognize limits-decency, propriety, all the traits Groucho Marx associated with Margaret Dumont-probably because the revolutionary Jew was at war with the Torah as an inhibiting superego to be destroyed so liberation could flourish. People who thought Ozzie and Harriet
and the Gospel according to St. John could all be rolled up into one big ball and dismissed as goyische culture, which is what Roth does in Portnoy, wouldn't understand moral nuance or the relationship between the moral and the cultural orders.

-------
The Torah is about limits, but the Revolutionary Jew doesn't respect limits because he learned from Freud and Marx that "morality" is an irrational taboo, like not eating lobster. Since the Jew learned as a child, in Portnoy's words, "it doesn't make any difference either ... how big or how small the rule is that you break, it's the breaking alone that gets His goat," all moral law is one large irrational taboo.
If you're going to be hanged for a dietary sheep, why not be hanged for a sexual lamb? Yet Portnoy's conscience is troubled nonetheless: "Why," he wonders, "must the least deviation from respectable conventions cause me such inner hell? When I hate those fucking conventions! When I know better than the taboos!"
With reason dismissed as irrational taboo, all that is left is appetite. 'The superego is seen as a Nazi storm trooper; as a result, ego or reason can only choose appetite: "But then all the unconscious can do anyway, so Freud says, is want. And want! and WANT!" 'The good Jew thus must wage war on conscience, first in himself through psychoanalysis, and then as the savior of the benighted goyim, especially good looking shikses. Roth redefines the Yid as id waiting to be liberated.
'The role of the revolutionary Jewish Messiah is to "PUT THE ID BACK IN YID! Liberate this nice Jewish boy's libido," Portnoy pleads with his psychoanalyst, "will you please? Raise the prices if you have to! I'll pay anything!"
Given the tenuous Jewish understanding of the distinction between eating shellfish and committing adultery, it is not surprising that psychoanalysis has succeeded in debunking morals. So, Portnoy says, "I simply will not enter into a contract to sleep with just one woman for the rest of my days." Portnoy has been liberated from marriage, the institution that might have turned him into a decent human being. He is free to be bad, "Because to be bad, Mother, that is the real struggle: to be bad-and to enjoy it! 'That is what makes men of us boys, Mother. But what my conscience, so-called, has done to my sexuality, my spontaneity, my courage.''
Convinced his vices are virtues, convinced by Reich and Freud that sexual repression is evil and "morality" is an irrational taboo, the Revolutionary Jew can transform American culture by remaking it in his distorted image. Just tell a few jokes and the idols of WASP American culture all crumble into dust. Another word for Jewish humor was "demythologizing." Like Jake the Snake, the ghetto Jew from Newark, Philip Roth, according to Cooper,

demythologized the world of the respectable. As Henny Youngman, whining about family and friends while eliciting laughable squeaks from the violin (the very violin that was to make of every little Jewish boy, myself included, a world famous, urbane, poetic, dignified and revered Yehudi) demytholgized our yearnings for cultural superiority.

The rise of Jewish humor meant the transformation of America into something Jewish. That transformation has been so complete that now an alternative is difficult to imagine. Is there an American humor that is not Jewish? Bloom is both fatuous and to the point when he quotes Charles Simic, "it is impossible to imagine a Christian or a fascist theory of humor." By mid 20th century, "Jewish funniness," says Bloom, had triumphed over "the scenes and tropes sanctifying this New England legacy.'' And "Alfred Kazin ratified this triumph in 1966 by dismissing earnest intellectuals and honoring such funny Jewish 'clowns and minstrels' as the 'Marx Brothers, Eddie Cantor, Al Jolson and Fanny Brice' for 'establishing the Jew in the national consciousness as a distinctly American figure ... as a representative national entertainer'.''

Philip Roth's alter-egos are, in Bloom's words, "culture warriors" eager to "trespass on the hallowed ground of WASP dominance." Roth is the successor to Groucho Marx, "standing poised to vandalize yet another monument to New England's Brahmin ascendancy,'' as Groucho did in Horsefeathers by calling himself Quincy Adams Wagstaff. The eclipse of the Irish as the nation's comedians meant what Jews thought was funny was now funny for everyone. That meant the systematic violation of taboos. It was all goyische idiocy anyway.
"They worship a Jew," Jake Portnoy tells his son, "do you know that, Alex? Their whole big-deal religion is based on worshipping someone who was an established Jew at that time. Now how do you like that for stupidity? How do you like that for stupidity? How do you like that for pulling the wool over the eyes of the public .... They took a Jew and turned him into some kind of God after he is already dead ... I assure you, Alex, you are never going to hear such a mishegoss of mixedup crap and disgusting nonsense as the Christian religion in your entire life. And that's what these big shots, so-called, believe!"
That Jewish transformation of American humor also meant the subversion of sexual morals. Lenny Bruce and Philip Roth focusing "on genitalia as a key site of desire made the comedy of concupiscence central to Jewish funniness in the early 1960s.'' Bloom cites the heroine in LeRoy Jones's play Dutchman who denounces "all those Jewish poets" whose "poems are always funny and always about sex."'
Jones, says Bloom, "recognized in Jewish funniness a reversal of the prevailing idealistic
Platonic trajectory. This overriding Western legacy maintains that, rightly regarded, fleshly desire must lead to spiritual reflection or at least to expressions of worthier aspirations than carnal appetite.'' Like Philip Roth and Adolf Hitler, Bloom posits the Jew as quintessentially a sexual degenerate. He cites

Daphne Merkin's reading of Jewish Eros, from the "core of the Jewish stance toward lust," its "emphasis on demystifying the erotic.'' For all its conjugal emphasis, Merkin stresses the degree to which this stance rests on "a shrewd recognition that marital life and ... ritual" cannot "fully tame the stirrings of desire."

------
By the 1970S, being Jewish and being American meant one and the same thing, certainly in humor, but in other areas too. The average American had become a sexually addicted zombie, like Portnoy, content to let the offspring of ghetto Jews manage his free time. What the Hollywood Jews were to Bill Clinton, the New
York neoconservative Jews became for George W. Bush. The average American could chose Hollywood pornography or neoconservative wars in the Middle East for his nightly entertainment.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Fri Aug 24, 2018 9:23 pm



Abrahamic cock-fight.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Sun Aug 26, 2018 5:28 pm



The latest purging has already began, and can we say that we do not deserve it, after centuries of carelessness and self-indulgence?
It is a purging that will test our metal, one more time, and few of us will survive.
Those that do will have proven themselves against the most insidious variation this disease has ever taken. One our ancestors could not have imagined when they fought against its Asiatic hoards, when technologies still remained primitive enough to retain a corporeality we could see and push back against, with fist and spirit.
This time it is almost totally abstract....entirely of the mind, because it has adapted after so many defeats, and it no longer faces us on the physical planes where our ancestors have mastered it, time after bloody time.
This time it will engage us through proxies, always wearing our form and speaking our language; this time it will use our own kind to assail us, from within.
This time it will test us on a deeper visceral level.

Let the many among us fall, for they shame our past.
Let us face this coming calamity not as a tragedy but an opportunity, to cleanse ourselves of what has infected us, so that we may find that forgotten spirit, and perhaps, rise again, like a phoenix from these ashes.  









_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Tue Aug 28, 2018 10:07 am

Guillame, Faye wrote:
The Notion of ‘Love’:
One of the Pathologies of Civilisation
Western civilisation began to grow considerably weaker from the day it started assigning an absolute value to a pathological feeling: love. This pathology has eroded both our demographic resources and our defensive instincts. It is a secularised Christian inheritance. Does this mean that hate must be the motor of conquering and creative civilisations? No. It is ‘love’, whether personal or collective, that represents a pathological and emphatic form of solidarity leading to failure and, paradoxically, hate and massacres. Religious wars and contemporary forms of fanaticism on the part of the monotheistic religions of love and mercy are proof of this. Even totalitarian Communism was founded on the idea of ‘love of the people’.
It is necessary to have (temporary) allies among nations, not friends. Among individuals, it is better to say ‘I am fond of you’ than ‘I love you’, and to engage with others according to the logic of alliance
rather than the blind – and shifting – gratuitousness of love.
Love is absolute, hence totalitarian. Human feelings and strategies are changeable. Both in politics and in our personal relations, instead of the verb ‘to love’ let us use adopt a polytheistic range of verbs: to be fond of, admire, ally oneself with, come to terms with, protect, help, cherish, desire, etc.
We should not have children as a gift we wish to bestow on the partner we love, but rather because we feel this person is worthy of breeding and perpetuating our stock. Today half of all marriages fail because they are based on an adolescent and ephemeral feeling that vanishes with the first gust of wind. Lasting marriages are based on plans.
The same is happening with parents’ education of their children. This is also failing because it is based on the blissful adulation of one’s offspring (these by-products of love), which undermines the legitimacy and authority of parents, perceived as loving sheep. Politicians are similarly doomed to failure because their ideology and actions are marred by residues of love – good feelings, dogoodism, humanitarianism, pity, masochism, and a misdirected and hypocritical altruism – instead of resting on the decision-making will of pursuing one’s goal to the very end, whatever the cost.
This civilisation, which has long been implicitly founded on the distorted notion of love, must one day return to the allegory of Don Juan, the symbol of anti-love par excellence. Archeofuturism.

Philosophical Debacle and Frauds
The absence of genuine philosophical values in this fin de siècle of ours is illustrated by the popularity media commentators enjoy who promote hollow ideas, state the obvious and embrace hegemonic thought – people like Comte-Sponville, Ferry, Bernard-Henry Lévy, and Serres. Dogoodism with no metaphysics or spirituality, petty materialism, a childish return to the Enlightenment, hypocritical moralising and altruism, ethical virtuousness, ethno-masochism, xenophilia, kindness with ulterior motives, and irresponsible humanitarianism: all these mental attitudes are profoundly unsuited to our age. These weakening, emasculating and morally disarming values are misleading in a world that is growing increasingly harsh and which calls for just the opposite: for combative values.
While we need a new philosophy of action, in this society of bovines we are fed the stale remains of the Eighteenth century philosophy of compassion, passed off as brilliant novelties and advancements of the spirit.
A neo-dogmatic philosophy, capable only of ‘communicating’ (propaganda), is masked as one of anti-dogmatism, freedom and emancipation, while it is only the academic harping on about obsolete ideas and a tool of intellectual terrorism.
The philosophy of the hegemonic French intelligentsia of the Twentieth century will be remembered for its plagiarism (Sartre, Lévy), pathological altruism (Lévinas) and fraud (Lacan and the structuralists). It stands out for its use of abstruse language to convey ‘non-ideas’. This is why the excellent critical work on French philosophy written by Sokal and Bricmont, Intellectual Impostures, has stirred such controversy. Only the truth hurts.
To face the future, what we need is an inegalitarian philosophy of will to power. We must return to Nietzsche again, this visionary against the Enlightenment. The revolution that is approaching calls for a new epistemology capable of doing away with traditional humanism. Through a return to archaic values we must envisage man no longer as a divine being removed from animal nature but rather as both an actor and material, someone who experiments on himself according to a Faustian logic.

The Emasculation Process
Advertising follows rather than starts social trends. Its aim is to sell, not spread new fads or ideas. In this respect, all advertising accurately reflects its age, for it is forced to be business-like, effective and capable of precisely echoing the spirit of the ruling ideology. In a popular mainstream magazine, an ad for luxury shoes set in the changing room of a gym shows a woman facing two naked Black athletes taking a shower, whom she is ‘dominating’. The opposite page has a T-shirt ad. The models, two European males, display an effeminate and markedly gay look. They come across as arty fairies with a languid, tired gaze. Find the mistake.

The Responsibility Principle
This is not a conspiracy, it’s something worse. It’s a kind of ‘logic’ – a form of collective resignation. Conspiracy theorists are wrong. A strong folk will not let itself be captured or crushed by the system by which it is ruled. All peoples are responsible for their own destiny. What we get is our own fault, not that of others. We are the actors and guilty of our own defeats. A folk is never the passive victim of its own cultural or ethnic effacement: it is its author and an accomplice to it out of resignation and an unwillingness to defend itself. The cultural hegemony of the United States and the gradual and veiled colonisation of France and Europe by the Third World are not merely the product of manipulation. We have let such things happen to us. Our folk had the means – the democratic means – to defend itself. But it chose not to. A ‘secret orchestrator’ has little power when faced by a folk determined to resist it with all its might.

Archeofuturism

Abrahamic spiritual nihilism is still dominant in the modern psyche.
It has changed names, calling itself panpsychism, filtering into the arts, and the sciences as legitimate theories, and schools of thought.
The 'one god' has been prematurely declared dead.
He lives in the hearts and minds of the masses, usually the lower, more degraded, majorities.
He has acquired a secular veil, a new language called math, but he remains exactly as he was imagined when the human mind constructed the concept, dismayed and threatened by the world.
More brutal, with his love, and indifferent to those who do not worship, perhaps...but still all-encompassing and a noetic avenue of escape from self - salvation.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Thu Aug 30, 2018 9:55 am



Shallow values = those produced by juxtaposing noetic constructs with no reference to anything outside the mind.
Detachment of idea(l)s from the real.
Confusion of words for what they represent - understanding them as literal, rather than as figurative.
Absolutism = belief that the vague concept of an absolute, actually exists outside the mind, and the words used to externalize it.

Absent Absolute = immutable, indivisible, whole...god as the Abrahamics define the concept.
It's 'absent' but claimed to be present, 'inside', in some esoteric realm, metaphorically describing the mind, but adding the necessary mystifying vagueness to made the critical mind sacrifice its reasoning, for the sake of comfort and eternal life.

The either/or absolutism of Modern confusion as to the nature symbols, semiotics, and their utility, their proper application.

Positive and Pure Nihilism, the bi-polar psychosis of the Modern.
Either all is nil, or all is one.
No gradations. No higher/lower, inferior/superior....either all are slaves or all are masters.
Either all know or all are ignorant. The foundation of egalitarianism, which ironically produces Messianic psychosis that takes advantage of it, by those overcompensating because of it.
it's not ironic to think of how believing in either/or absolutes would produce a 1/0 psychosis, where the individual places himself/herself either on the side of thinking of self as nothing, or on the side of the absolute thing.
The latter exploiting the self-deprecating feebleness of the former, offering to the nothings a taste of somethingness..a shadow to the priest's channelling of thingness, named God.  
The absolutely imperfect would be dismayed, and inspired by those who declare themselves absolutely perfect. They would seek guidance, and sheltering...within the either/or absolutism they are trapped in.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Thu Aug 30, 2018 12:11 pm

What is Abrahamism but a belief that there is beauty/power 'beyond', 'outside' nature, justified by evoking some occult, hidden world, using poetics and prose to threaten and promise what it can never deliver.
It's the promise of the supernatural, an untapped source signs point to, if you have the right eyes to read them, and the understanding to decipher them.
The call of the prophet to his sheeple.
"Come gather hither, around me, for the saviour cometh, and I am his servant. I have read the signs, and bring good tidings. Look into thyselves and find him waiting for you to discover him. I am but the messenger leading you to what you already know. Do not be afraid of my power, for it comes from there; do not be envious of my beauty, for it is the reflection of what you have yet to see."
Endless power, perfect beauty, as only it can exist inside the mind of those who have neither.

What is 'beyond' and 'outside' nature?
Meaningless words triggering dissatisfaction with the experienced, directing the mind inward where such perfections and omnipotence exists, vaguely calling to us in obscurity, through the shadows of our cognition to follow it, our needs, inward, into the dark chasms of our noetic abstractions.


The Greeks knew what beauty is.
They had measured it and chiselled it in stone...an often disproportional physique they could not attain, but only admire in marble.
Those prone to idealism will idealize the Greeks, like a man who feels ugly, idealizes beauty, feels powerless, idealizes power, or feels that he may be simple, idealizes complexity.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Thu Sep 06, 2018 4:12 pm

A man cannot defeat a female using feminine tactics – at least only a rare few can, and of those most are more female than most biological females. Therefore, you cannot defeat Nihilism using Pagan principles and tactics. Against Islam, only Judaism and Christianity can offer a challenge; against Judaism, only Islam and Christianity can offer a challenge; against Christianity, only Islam and Judaism can offer a challenger.
This transfers into secular forms of Nihilism. Only Abrahamism was, and still is, a formidable enemy to Marxism, attempting to replace Judeo-Christian dogma with Communism. The masses, controlled by similar methods, manipulating the same existential anxieties, were the hearts & minds these ideologies competed over.
We see it to this day how only a revived Christian ethos can offer resistance to post-modern crypto-Marxism and its underlying Zionism. Everything has to be contained within the same paradigm – the bipolar absolutes of pure and positive Nihilism, each offering its own alternative to natural injustices.
Indo-European traditions are too forward, too open and direct, too noble, too manly to outperform these effete dogmas, so adept at word-games, and passive-aggressive tactics.
Has any male ever managed to convince a woman, hysterical and unable to think rationally, by using reason? Has any man ever succeeded in gaining an advantage over a female by using language correctly, and by applying reason stringently?
This Nebulous War[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], is a feminine one. Physical and mental prowess will have a minimal effect. Muscle and reason have minimal power here. This is about sensations, impressions, emotions, and mind-games, using words to obscure and redirect, not to clarify and attain the truth.
Let the women deal with one another, before we think of stepping in.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Thu Oct 25, 2018 8:58 pm



Back to the metaphor of the Borg Queen.
In this scene the contradiction is described.
She brings order to chaos.She is one, and many, beginning and end. Alpha and Omega in the Christian canon.
She is messiah, because she cannot die. Another takes her place, because the multiplicity is indistinguishable. She is 'resurrected' in any other Borg, because she is representative of the 'collective'.
She, a cyborg, yet corporeal, tangible, is a mere representation of the 'idea(l) called 'Borg'...in the same way Christ is a mere corporeal incarnation of the idea(l) called 'god'.
What is 'god' in Abrahamic canon? It is the idea(l)...the logos of an idea. 'Idealism'.
The Semites invented their 'god' as the unifying of their 'collective...the idea of Judaism was born. He 'chose them' when all other tribes had rejected 'him'...though a 'her is more appropriate, because, as with the metaphor of the Borg, the female is the carrier of the ideology, passing on from one to another, and all hives have a female queen as the nexus, the birthing womb.
She does not control, she provides a nexus, a brain for the collective to centralize....giving order to chaos.
The Abrahamics not affected by any contact with paganism, any contact with Athens/Rome, when they were sill developing, circumcise themselves as a symbolic sacrifice of their 'masculinity' to the hive mind.
They retain the organ, as a hive tolerates drones yearly, to carry out the biological necessity, not even the ideology can offer an alternative to sexual reproduction - not yet.
I suspect, as techniques/technologies develop, the masculine will be entirely unnecessary. We also see the development of linguistics, because all females need this trait to carry out their reproductive role within the hive. Communicating with other members of a hive is important.
The affect of contact with Hellenism splintered Abrahamism, as I noted elsewhere. Hellenism triggered their abandoned tribalism, which was supported by the awareness of what a hive-mind meant...of what was coming....was immanent - progressing towards the Utopian Ideal, Paradise on earth.
Circumcision would not be enough. The entire penis would have to go - see Transhumanism = by-product of nihilism, starting from Zoroastrianism, through Abrahamism, and culminating in post-modernity.
Technologies & Techniques can carry out the functions of a biological male: provider & protector.....already established through institutions....but now also propagator.
The only reason Abrahamism retained sexual identity was that it lacked the means to propagate its flock. It's 'ideal' flock is an all-female hive - the perfect church. One-God, Masculine monopoly, dominating its harem.

Cyborg is a technological Zombie. The virus taking the form of cybernetic prosthetics, gradually replacing flesh and blood. Symbolic replacement of genes with memes. Gradual replacement of the real into the idea(l)...the phenomenon absorbed by the noumenon...toward the coming, the forever immanent pure idea(l) = God.
The messiah is a representation of what is coming - a harbinger.
Prophets prepare the way for the coming messiah, and the messiah, the 3rd of 3 are harbingers of the coming hive-mind, the One-God.
Three is not an accidental number. It represents the three part of the Platonic psyche, the Mind/Nervous System/Body. It is the ideological purification of humanity. No flesh and blood will separate, will soil....all will be unified in the idea(l)...call it God, call it State, call it Love, call it One.
The coming of the third will bring Armageddon. All this in the canon. A self-fulfilling prophesy.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Thu Oct 25, 2018 9:48 pm

In Abrahamism the Messiah is a representation of the collective; the tangible, corporeal representation of the idea(l), named God. As symbol of the Idea(l) made flesh & blood, he is resurrected, because as long as one follower lives, one believer in the Idea(l), the ‘church’ does not die.
The saviour is the idea(l) brought into the world – a symbol of the collective, the church. Synthesis of ideal/real, phenomenon/noumenon.

The 'salvation' offered is through the one-god = idea. An idea(l) is eternal, it is immortal, if there remains one believer, one follower it never dies.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1867
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Fri Oct 26, 2018 4:15 am

Does one dying for a belief demonstrate their confidence in the associated being true, or their discomfort living with it being untrue?

EDIT: My 'answer'... If I die for the belief of my children continuing, because my inaction would cause them to die, then I have died because of discomfort with the idea of them being killed/dead. It does not mean that I was a 'true believer', no more than I would be a 'true believer' about water hydrating me. There is no supernatural power at work.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Fri Oct 26, 2018 6:04 am

The survival of the meme, the ideology, is what matters. the individual, infected by nihilistic memes, identifies only with the idea(l).
He/She has no genetic identity. No race, no sex, no species, no flesh and blood dimension. He is only the idea(l), and as long as there is one follower/believer, the idea(l) survives. It is eternal, in theory, as theory.
By the Book, for the Book, as I say.
The individual feels that he survives through the idea(l) he identifies 'self' with.
You can't kill an idea(l) easily. One emasculated coward and imbecile suffices for it to survive.
This is the reason why Abrahamism could not contradict the identifier of sex. It did not have the technologies to compensate for the loss of biological males.
The idea(l) sex being the feminine. It propagates the ideology, because the male only propagates genetics...it births 'genos' (γενος), according to the Greeks. The female (τικτη), carries to term.
Males were relegated to an emasculated role - as representation of what cannot be corporeal, and cannot fertilize females. Emasculated males, feminization, was the alternative.
Dawkins spoke of the 'selfish gene', well I speak of the 'selfish meme'.
The individual's welfare, his genes, are irrelevant. The only importance all individuals have are as carriers of the meme - idea(l). Like I said...the nihilistic meme is pure noumenon, pure ideology, theory, it has no tangible, presence, so it hijacks the body, via the mind - zombification. Virus. It occupies the body, to propagate. Zombifying virus.
The individual, as a genetic identity, is collateral damage - sacrificed to the idea(l)....God, or Marxism....or Humanity.
'Humanity' has become like a beehive collective, or the Borg. Indistinct biological oneness, a multiplicity of flesh each representing the Oneness of the Idea(l).
Jesus was the avatar of this transformation from gene/meme to pure meme. Mohammed was the second. The Jews await the third, to finish it.
But they were affected by their contact with the Greeks, and rediscovered their 'tribalism'....only they had lost their pagan traditions, so they attempted to merge Judaism and reinvent a  transformed to ideology, tribe - humanity.
Marxism was born from this synthesis. A global tribe of man. One God became one-man = Borg symbol. A collective of 'individuals'.
Capitalism used a different approach....God = Money. The unifying oneness via money - the great equalizer.
How much money you can get, means how much collective acknowledgement, appreciation, approval. More money means 'closer to the divine', closer to god.
What is the sacrifice? Your identity and, more importantly Time. You offer to the 'god' money your time/space, your very existence, in other words, for a life in paradise/utopia....or to gain eternity.
Both Communism & Capitalism makes 'progress' the sanctifying ritual, approaching the divine. They replace, piety, faith, with supply/demand, production & consumption.
What survives any one individual in Capitalism?
His accumulated wealth. What he earned by selling himself to the masses, the collective with what he had no genetic relationship. He sacrificed himself to the idea(l) = God/Money.
Money is a symbol of more than mere resources. After the elimination of the Gold Standard, money can represent, and purchase ideas/ideals. Eliminating the gold representation, purified the idea(l) of money - brought it closer to pure symbol, pure idea = abstraction.
Money uses mathematics....and numbers are another form of language. God at its closest to pure idea(l). Numbers are pure abstraction, and money is its tangible representation - semiotics.
The more you sacrifice to the God, the more he rewards you with the compensating symbols for your degenerate, inferior genes. Past/Nature does not matter when you have money; quantity usurped by quantities.
Money 'liberates' you from a determined past - it is the 'saviour'. God's emissary, his worldly representation.
Money is Messiah.

After Jesus, and Mohammed, money is the third and last Jewish Messiah.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν


Last edited by Satyr on Fri Oct 26, 2018 6:31 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1867
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Fri Oct 26, 2018 6:27 am

This would mean, in regards to my question, that the individual is discomforted by losing a sense of identity that would be lost if it 'lived' with the idea it identifies with being false. (I believe you've (Satyr) said as much before, that this is the attempted 'coldness' of the identitilessness strain of nihilism today, stripping individuals in order to provide their own 'solution'/identity.) In other words, identifying but disbelieving conflict. It's the same dichotomy projected onto Europeans today: you are white-privileged, but you should not believe you are white; though you are privileged for being white.

Saying to identify with something, then saying it must be falsified, basically demanding utter weakness, egolessness and soullessness, if (post-)modernity has managed to actually create such a phenomenon. I don't see anything supernatural about identifying with an abstraction - one can abstract things they care about just as well, even if not viscerally experienced. Told over the phone that one has 'kidnapped your son', is able to trigger the abstraction which (re)produces a memory.

I think Abrahamism, or religion, or state, can be (re)producers of the infantile experience; hence US text books saying "the state is like your parents/family" in their analogies/metaphors.

Otherwise, I'm not sure what can explain the phenomenon of it. To say it comes from sheer noeticism doesn't appear to explain it - though they can develop solipsism at a later state in development. Fundamentally, when challenged where it can no longer be noetic, it appears to be a threat to comfort.

How comfort and identity are interactions/co-actions, is interesting (to me).
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Sun Oct 28, 2018 7:35 pm

Philanthropy has been the guise of the life haters. They offer hat motherly sheltering, promising atrophy and a slow death.
They love not....like a father loves his son. Exposing him to headache and hardship because he knows the ways of the world and he wants to prepare him for them.

The charlatan comes smiling, full of warmth, flattery, and promises, veiled threats, and obscure mysticism.
He appropriates the kings wealth, wears his wardrobe, drinks his wine, wishes to copulate with his wife, because the king is lost at sea ans it is uncertain if he shall return.
What do worm-tongues whisper in their prayers, but a silent hope that the king will be lost at sea, and when they pray to their god they pretend they are praying to the knig's gods, so desperate he is to be what he is not, and can never be.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Mon Oct 29, 2018 9:56 am



An inter-Abrahamic conflict, similar to the Cold War.
Catholicism was the true by-product of the contact between Hellenism and Judaism, represented by the iconic figure of Jesus.
It reminds the Nihilists of the source. Catholicism retained the outer appearance of Rome when its esotericism was entirely corrupted by Judaism. Nevertheless, it retains too many reminders of Hellenism/Rome.  
Its apex was reached with the election of JFK, and since his assassination is in decline, allowing Protestantism/Judaism to dominate. with its particular brand of victim-hood, and its rebelliousness towards all forms of authority, including natural order.
Although Catholicism inverted reality, like all nihilistic variants, it was forced to retain the identifiers of family, based no heterosexual, natural, dynamics. God could not fertilize its emasculated/feminized, flock, so it needs biological males to be proxies of his limitations, and his absence.
Advancements in techniques/technologies have rendered it obsolete.
The idea(l) of the biological/genetic Zombie, is replaced by the puritan Cyborg - robot Russian for 'work'.
A upgraded worker-bee, still governed by the same virus, and controlled by the usual parasite.

Cultural conflict expresses itself in ideological debates, such as the 'morality of abortion'.
Curbing the power of the Catholic Church, by the WASPS, meant allowing easy access to birth cotnrol and abortion clinics.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 2828
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 35
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Mon Oct 29, 2018 10:11 am

Catholics seem to be more tied to rural European populations and farming.
I think Protestantism is tied to an urbanisation and a merchant/industrial economy.

Farming used to be quite family oriented plus subordinate families, more sustenance based. You get paid mostly through what you farmed yourself and with what you built, like a roof over your head.

A manufacturing company or trading company depends on individual workers and pays them mostly with money. Money is the creator and glue of those hierarchies.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Mon Oct 29, 2018 10:34 am

Yeah, they're closer to Paganism. Holy Roman Empire and Byzantium were the first products of Hellenic/Roman corruption, and degradation.
Protestantism, infected with the 'revolutionary bug, of inversion, liberated themselves from its authority, further distancing themselves from Paganism.
It was a 'progressive' advancement towards idealism.
Jesus ceased to be a representation of a people, and became purified idea(l).

The real was left further behind as they advanced towards nihilism.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Mon Oct 29, 2018 1:48 pm

You know your enemy, the other, only when you fight him.
But you can also gauge him by watching how he fights another.



Watching the Abrahamics compete, suing their methods, their word-games, teaches us their nature.
The entire interview should be listened to but the most telling point is at 55:00 onward.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν


Last edited by Satyr on Mon Oct 29, 2018 2:45 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Mon Oct 29, 2018 2:19 pm

Relative hates relative, above all strangers.
Semites feel threatened by their brother Semites.
Jews feel most vulnerable in Islamic societies. The son threatens the mother.
Trump hints at a selective immigration policy, selectively excluding Muslims, while still allowing all other tribes in to dilute the European bloodlines.
He's ideal, because he is so insane and narcissistic, that he can contradict himself, logic, reality, and accomplish the incomprehensible.
He's what they call a 'useful imbecile'.
Bush got elected, so why not someone like Trump?
Idiocy is not enough, it's too indifferent....you need that mix of idiocy and narcissism to achieve certain goals.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Mon Oct 29, 2018 3:07 pm

On the Abrahamic (Nihilistic) foundations of the USA:


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Mon Oct 29, 2018 6:30 pm



When Jones uses the word 'god', meaning his Abrahamic god, you should understand it as 'nature'.
Logos was for the ancient-Greeks, logic, reason, speech, connecting man to nature, or their gods.
Nature cannot be defeated using words and symbols and mind-games.
Natural order is dominant, and chaos is where they stake their hopes. Their non-existent one-God, is an abstraction inverting everything....natural order, is translated into absolute chaos, which is redefined as a singularity, an absolute order.
Flux is (inter)activity of patterns, or order, but it also includes the randomness of chaos, or non-patterned energies.
Abrahamics have imploded order into a singularity, and made it into a representation of their desires and needs.
Christians, Muslims and Jews, the triad of Abrahamic Nihilism, use God to represent themselves, or their idealized conception of themselves.
Christians declare themselves 'saved' from their inability to live-up to their idea(l), and so have the Muslims, bu the Jews still live in shame awaiting redemption....but they've made themselves their own one-God....an abstraction referring to their collective. A god denied by other tribes, but chosen by them - they choose themselves as God, and their paradise is on earth....Utopia, a coming Armageddon, or salvation, or a salvation via Armageddon.
Splintered into three, as the Christians splintered their god, themselves, into a triad, mirroring the platonic psyche.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Wed Oct 31, 2018 11:08 am

Anti-Semitism...some comments:

1)The first thing to say, and repeat, is that Semites are not Jews, and Jews are not necessarily Semites.
If I criticize the Soviet Union, I am not anti-Slav, but anti-Communist.
If I critique Christianity I am not against all the tribes that adopted it as their Nihilistic spirituality.
If I criticize Nazism I am not anti-Germanic.
If I offer critique to a loved one, it is not because I want to punish or destroy them.....so critique, analysis is not an attack. Exposing Judaism may inhibit its survival strategy from being effective, and this can be considered a threat no its welfare, but just as I can appreciate its evolved survival strategies it must acknowledge my desire to remain immune to them.  

Genes/Memes.
Semites are a tribal identity, and Judaism is an ideological, spiritual one.
Body/Mind. Noumenon/Phenomenon.
Some Semitic tribes did not adopt Judaism, but Islam.
Critiquing the meme is not automatically an attack on its genetic foundation. Criticizing a belief is not a hatred of the believer.
Analysing and Criticizing Judaism is not anti-Semitic...it may just be anti-Judaism, and all its by-products...such as Christianity, Zionism, Marxism, and post-modernity.

2) Some Semitic tribes adopted Judaism as a survival strategy. This necessitated the cultivation of specific traits, characteristics, and use of semiotics.
To analyse a survival strategy does not indicate a desire to exterminate it.
If I analyse a virus, a parasite, and marvel at its evolved traits to facilitate the niche survival strategy, does not mean I want to exterminate it from the face of the earth. It may only mean I wish to become immune to its methods, so that I don to become infected by it.  

3) The Jews usual defence is an accusation trying to shame. It's a defensiveness, triggered by its insecurity. Nazism is the usual attack, referring back to the stand-by of victimhood.
When a Jew feels vulnerable, under threat, or about to be exposed, he uses this attack so as to inhibit further investigation.
His strategy of survival works best when it remains in the shadows...remains undetected. He flexes his muscle and then runs for cover in threats and innuendoes, casting aspersions like a spineless squid squirts ink into the water.

4- Some Semitic tribes sacrifices their identity for the sake of becoming efficient and effective in this niche survival strategy.
They developed their semiotic skills to cultivate effectiveness. They adopted feminine traits, social skills, that served them in the market where they found their niche environment. The market of symbols/language = semiotics. Their talents in the market of products translated into a talent in the market of ideas - genes/memes again.
This sacrifice entailed an acceptance of what other tribes rejected: an embracing of nihilism, creating a symbiont. they allegorically represented it as 'choseness'. They chose themselves, when all other tribes rejected them. They denied this inversion mysticism to all other tribes, or to the lower strata of their civilization, so as to preserve their 'choseness' the distinctiveness of the narrative.
This produced hatred among the lower strata of other tribes who also sought relief from their inherited place in the hierarchy. A fact they remedied with the invention of Marxism....offering salvation to those that were rejected...but thus entailed a rejection of the spiritual and a secularization of the method.
Meanwhile, via the idol Jesus, also of their tribe, Judaism was translated into a form the pagan masses could relate to, and Christianity was invented.
This produced an animosity between two variants of the same strategy, the same ideology...the same Nihilism.  

I've offered my own analysis on what produces Nihilism, on what it is, how it propagates, and how it is a memetic equivalent of genetic diseases, viruses.
Nietzsche diagnosed it, and focused on one variant, without going further into the source and the variations.
This was his opus....and we are grateful for the insight. But he became stuck on Christianity, for some private reason...Human All too Human.
Maybe it had to do with his open upbringing, as a son of a pastor, or maybe contact with Wagner, and an egotism of wanting to liberate himself from a mentor that dominated his youth, wanting to dissociate himself from a influential shadow and make a name for himself....or maybe it was due to his relationship with Ree and Salome...or maybe he did not want to risk his stipend and his economic independence.... we can never know for certain.
What we do know is that he did critique Judaism through Christianity.....or he did indirectly criticize Abrahamism, through its Christian.  

We can identify Zionism as the other side along with Marxism.
Zionism was the product of contact with the more masculine, Hellenic culture. A rebirth of tribal pride, a desire to return to a pagan past, to take root in the earth from where they had detached and have been wandering, on its surface, for centuries.
But old habits are not easily overcome. They revert to their victimhood tactics when they feel threatened, or when their methods are exposed.
The Brits gave them a homeland, when the original plan was Madagascar. The Russians went along because they wanted to rid themselves from their effects.
When the British Empire declined the US took over as their protector....and like the Romans were dominated internally by the conquered Greeks, the US was conquered internally by Judaism.
The US that started off with the ambition to become a new Rome, and we can see this in the buildings they erected to house their institutions, and by the fact that they considers adopting Greek as their official language, instead of English....but it no longer has anything to do with Rome, but only wears the garments, while its soul is entirely Abrahamic....Jewish.  

We cannot 'hate' a successful survivals strategy...no more than we can hate the flu, or a dog or a cat, for being what it is.
We can only study it, analyse its methods, its tactics, its effects....so that we can return to an earlier state of health.
We can think of the infected, and too far-gone to be re-turned, to be saved, as collateral damage, as a cleansing of the weakness that made us all vulnerable to this infection.
Studying the dis-ease exposes the weaknesses that it took advantage of in ourselves, and our practices and attitudes. To study and critique the parasite, is a means of gaining insight into our own mistakes, and how these produced our current weaknesses.

The primeval wisdom states...
   
...challenges us.
If this kills us, then we deserve to die.
And if we survive having lost our past, our soul, our spirit, then the old Biblical quote stands, with a different meaning, a pagan definition for 'soul'...


The Jews gave up their souls to gain the world, because they place survival above all other principles, and motives. They sacrificed their Semitism, to find an earthly utopia in Judaism.
The feminine spirit is always attracted to what promises power through association, when power is denied to it. It finds a proxy, to give itself to, to surrender and become a means for its ends.
Genes are sacrificed on the alter of the Meme....reality sacrificed on the altar of Ideology.


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Thu Nov 01, 2018 3:54 pm



[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] the unifying idol/icon of Judaism, splintering into Christianity, when it came in contact with Hellenism, and Islam, when it came in contact with other Semitic tribes in the east.
the two Messiahs, Jesus and Mohamed, represent the connecting icon/idol between the ideology of Judaism, and the pagan spiritual beliefs of each respectively.
These 'Messiahs' are inversion icons/idols, converting the already popular pagan beliefs, and the purely noetic ideology of Judaism.
Because Jewish 'choseness' did not permit any other tribes from entering the 'covenant', or the conversion of genes into idealogical meme, since all tribes, according to the Jews, had 'rejected' the god they embraced and accepted.....and 'God' is nothing more than a abstraction of their tribal, genetic, unity, represented by an icon/idol, which is never given a form/face because this would expose tis true essence, and because this would contradict its 'purely abstract, theoretical' essence.
Like with all mysticism, the concept has to remain as vague as possible, permitting any interpretation, and the plausible deniability escape.
The 'one god' of Abraham was nothing more than an ideological representation of the 12-13 tribes that had 'accepted' him, as a representative, and to be his earthly representatives damned & blessed to 'suffer' on his behalf, and to bring about 'heaven on earth';....Utopia. The Jews have no paradise.
The narrative of being 'chosen' narrates with innuendo, the Jews converting themselves inot an idea(l), a God....this is what 'divine' mean...conversion of the mundane, the corporeal, the earthly, into pure ideology, idea9l), theory, abstraction....purifying it, in mind, into a concept. A concept can do no wrong, can have no flaws, because it is theory, abstraction, and remains vague enough to remain obscurely perfect.
So, 'choseness' means the Semites 'choosing' themselves, their genes, their parasitical survival methods, when all other tribes had rejected them as beneath them, as ignoble, as shameful.
This is how they became wealthy...through usury.

this methodology became Christianity and Islam, adapting it to the more 'primitive, for them' tribes in the east and west.
Christianity became Judaism for the European pagan, and Islam became Judaism for the tribal Semite which was not part of the original 12-13 - a lesser Semite, not deserving of Judaism.
Later it evolved into Marxism, post-modernity, but was also infected by Hellenism producing Zionism.
Currently it is secularized into post-modernity. The one-god is still an ideology...and the Jewish Messiah is already here....it is called 'money'.
Money, as a tangible representation of mathematics, detached from the gold standard so that it can remain a pure theoretical abstraction representing everything and anything, or nothing.
Money IS the Jewish Messiah. Like their God, he remains a pure noumenon, abstraction, ideology.


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17667
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:25 pm

But Nihilism and monotheism was not invented by the Semites. Like all parasites it assimilated what it found in the host culture/civilization, and adjusted it to its own needs. They appropriated, stole, what the Egyptian and the Persians had produced, just as they alter adjusted Hellenism to their need to produce Zionism, and Marxism.
Nor are the Semites the source of Nihilism.
As I said before Nihilism is a by-product of self-awareness, or emerging self-consciousness, seeking relief in semiotics, and the defensive methods of noetic constructs.
All the Semites did was accept the nihilism as a tactic they could exploit and apply in order to make their parasitical survival tactics more effective/efficient. This is when they became Jews.
they were 'hated' when they denied this strategy to all other tribes, or all other members of the lower social strata in other tribes, reserving the elite position of 'chosen' victim, for themselves.
then they cultivated language, through the Talmud, Torah, Kabbalah, and other methods, to make themselves more effective in the manipulative of language and the exploitation of weakness in other tribes - parasitism.
They adopted 'magic', or the 'magi' traditions, teachings, from the Aryan Zoroastrian, Persians, and built an entire mystical foundation around it.
Even 'money' was, much later, mystified when it was detached from the tangible, Gold Standard...and converted to pure noetic abstraction.
Money is now the Jewish Messiah.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1867
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism Fri Nov 02, 2018 12:09 am

What parasitical human behavior pre-dated Abrahamism?

One could hardly call an infant 'parasitical', being an offspring. Its behavior and the idea of 'innocence', 'cuteness' or even 'victimhood' which is bolstered all the more by 'innocence' or 'cuteness', appears like a necessary adaptation for semiotics. The binary nature of language/abstraction creating dichotomies/mental schisms as it evolved. Having to treat children/infants with a different and distinct monad (Leibniz) in semiotics. Being a perceived-as-victim does have the benefits of a protective mother, and possibly protective father if he is fooled into it.

Is there a peacocking sort of behavior that was performed or emphasized by Semites? Their revolting look, that they manage to live, eventually becoming its own sort of 'strength'. Even if that strength relies on the blindness of an Aryan civilization to its ghettos.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Abrahamism

Back to top Go down
 
Abrahamism
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 5 of 6Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: