Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalFAQMemberlistSearchRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy.

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
OnWithTheirHead
hero


Gender : Male Posts : 514
Join date : 2017-01-05
Location : .

PostSubject: culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy. Fri Feb 09, 2018 4:44 am

so i've been thinking. at my age my body is in a lot of pain, physically and mental, computer labor makes my back ache. i am at because of the choices i made. now some may say there is a genetic reason for where i am. the black side of me has always wanted to enter paradise, without having to work hard. the white side of me and my high intelligence was always afraid of being a slave and doing dreary, repetitive tasks.

so i been thinking about the pain i am in and my back pain and lack of energy. I think the world thinks this is good, because i am going to take somebody's job. People deep down dont want you to have a job, everything is highly competitive. If i get a job, that means i am taking money from somebody else. the world is overpopulated to the point where having a job is not contributing to society, but the opposite. all markets are oversaturated and people would be better off with less people in it. So me in my poverty and misery, and back pain, people celebrate. Back pain, low energy means i am not as effective a worker. The less effective worker i am, the less chance i will enter the market and be competition. So people are actually celebrating that i am in pain. Therefore, there is a moral hypocrisy here. People want to help you for a day or two, but most would rather you don't succeed, because if you do that makes you competition in an oversaturated market. Therefore everyone, deep down, is rooting for everyone else to fail. This is of course, a moral hypocrisy.

the amount of wealth the wealthy people have is ridiculous. the elite have 99% of the wealth when everybody has 1%. this creates a furious competition where people are battling just to be slaves and pay rent. The wealthy are ruining everything by hording the wealth. wealth chart [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

personally i believe in a massive welfare state due to market oversaturation. the wealthy have to contribute a little, poor and middle class dont have to contribute anything. if you dont agree with this i dont care. this is mathematically derived and nothing to do with ethics. the stock market crash in the 1930's was caused by market oversaturation, specifically, too much food production and too many farmers. we do not need more workers or more food. 50% of the food in america goes to waste anyway. we do not need more gadgets and gizmos, 100% of them become obsolete in one year. we do not need more transportation, traffic jams occur daily as it is. the american economy is not real, it is an inflationary ponzi scheme in which the actual value of the goods do not matter, what matters is your ability to create an illusion that your goods are valuable, what matters is that you can dominate your rivals and appear to be powerful.

second the only 4 things that have value are intelligence, ethics, taste, and hard work. intelligence determines the efficiency of production/society, ie. computer tech. ethics and taste are related. ethics and taste determines the quality of life of society, ie. incentive to want to partake in society in the first place. since in modern times people have hypocritical ethics, and increasingly poor taste people are losing interest in furthering society ie. red pill movement. Personally when I see a beautiful, gorgeous woman it feels me with envy and rage, what i see is a beautiful thing I am sexually attracted to but can never have, not until I acquire a frivolous amount of wealth for the hefty price tag attached, of course the odds of which are totally against me due to a case of extreme market oversaturation. Hard work, slave labor, is of course the other valuable thing, you need dumb retards to do the jobs that intelligent people dont want to do (or are sheerly psychologically incapable of doing), of course in the coming years this can all be accomplished with robots entirely.

therefore the state of overpopulation is not mainly a problem of natural ecosystem or the health of the planet, rather it is a problem of market economics. However, health of the planet/ecosystem is also a secondary issue. so if overpopulation is a real issue then the obvious solution is culling.

the most logical solution to culling is to simply euthanize those deemed ready for culling. however as aforementioned we have ethics and taste to consider, we are not savages. Thus for a small cost we can simply castrate those ready for culling and spare their lives. eunuchs were a valid method in the past and so i dont see why not now. this will have a cost of having to feed them for the rest of their lives, however food in america is an excess so i dont see it being a major problem. Therefore what is left is having a sane method for culling. Personally I believe all religious people should be culled however that leaves us with a problem...without religion who in their right mind would slave away at a slave job? without nihilism what incentive would their be to be a poor worker drone, with no hope of a perfect utopian afterlife? These are valid concerns however with robots, they will not be needed anymore. Castrate all the religious people. By castrate I mean literally cut off their balls. In the words of Joker the city's not gonna castrate itself, grab some birdizzos and better get to castrating people.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
gafr

avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 104
Join date : 2016-05-31
Location : moon

PostSubject: Re: culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy. Fri Feb 09, 2018 6:25 pm

Existence is naturally competitive, the incentive to work which equates to survival is a good enough incentive in and of itself. Everything below this just dies, everything extremely above this also dies. Robots at the very depth of their meaning become a representation of what humans once were, a technological rebirth an immortality of the human spirit where the robots' creation became the objective of the human existence.

Can the human spirit, the life energy, the essence of what makes us what we are be captured and extracted and birthed into the robotic form? if not, then the machine remains to be a machine, regardless of how sophisticated it becomes, it still remains to be a machine..

Human stimulation in the context of collective competition is what gives birth to civilization, had it not been for this then the natural competition will only be shifted towards natural phenomenon.

The nature of the civilization is in contradiction of the nature that surrounds it and also the essence of the cycle of life. It's attempting to save everyone into an ideal, most likely robots will serve greatly in creating  a utopia on earth. Then what will become of the humans? will they not just fight? and start to kill each other..become stagnant? ill? will it not just give them more time to be preoccupied with differences among each other?

wont nature still be nature after all?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17027
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy. Fri Feb 09, 2018 6:54 pm

gafr wrote:
Existence is naturally competitive, the incentive to work which equates to survival is a good enough incentive in and of itself. Everything below this just dies, everything extremely above this also dies. Robots at the very depth of their meaning become a representation of what humans once were, a technological rebirth an immortality of the human spirit where the robots' creation became the objective of the human existence.
Techniques are externalizations of man's knowledge and understanding of internal psychological processes (mind/psyche); technologies are externalizations of man's knowledge and understanding of self (body).

gafr wrote:
Can the human spirit, the life energy, the essence of what makes us what we are be captured and extracted and birthed into the robotic form? if not, then the machine remains to be a machine, regardless of how sophisticated it becomes, it still remains to be a machine..
What is an organism?
the presence of the sum of all past nurturing.....the pinnacle of a continuum, causality connected by memory.
When you create a robot, a mechanical organism you are taking what you know of this continuum and detaching it from the natural biological causality chain , you create a copy of a small segment of it.
The robot is not part of the continuum, through genes, but is a detached and replicated segment.
When you have a child it is not detached from the genetic continuum, but is part of an unbroken process, linking it, through you and the mother, to a past.

gafr wrote:
Human stimulation in the context of collective competition is what gives birth to civilization, had it not been for this then the natural competition will only be shifted towards natural phenomenon.

The nature of the civilization is in contradiction of the nature that surrounds it and also the essence of the cycle of life. It's attempting to save everyone into an ideal, most likely robots will serve greatly in creating  a utopia on earth. Then what will become of the humans? will they not just fight? and start to kill each other..become stagnant? ill? will it not just give them more time to be preoccupied with differences among each other?

wont nature still be nature after all?
Memes are extensions of genes.
Ideas are representations of reality.

If the meme, the culture, is in conflict with natural processes, or the degree to which it contradicts them, is the degree to which it is antagonistic toward nature.
All organisms want to increase their survival/growth potentials, so this antagonism is part of the life-environment relationship.
But some memes are so survival obsessed that they are willing to sacrifice their nature to the altar of survival.
They do so by using language, or symbols, representing concepts, that invert experienced reality.
These memes are Nihilistic.
They are not merely antagonistic (agon) but they contradict existence (nullify).
These memes are not viable, if they are applies in practice as they are in theory.
So they are hypocritical - believing one thing and acting in opposition to it.
This is where 'sin' comes in as an explanation, or excuse.
Shame is converted to guilt because guilt can be paid for with punishment.
Modern nihilists live a life making amends for the lies they tell themselves and others, hoping that if they sacrifice or punish themselves enough, then they will be given eternal life after death - a contradiction in itself.
The biggest lie necessitating all the rest.
Nihilism is a way of keeping the masses placated - it is political.
It makes their minds into zombie mush.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
tautog

avatar

Gender : Male Libra Posts : 2
Join date : 2015-06-08
Age : 58
Location : east coast

PostSubject: Re: culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy. Sun Feb 25, 2018 10:04 am

There should be cull teams. Maybe judge Dredds who dispense justice on site. Drop your litter, get shot.
Steal, cut off hand. Cull the losers, the idyits, the drunks , the drug addicts, criminals. White collar and blue.
              But of course it will never be cuz the folly of humans.
     All the advice, counsel, and guidance is futile for many.
I have followed you Satyr since your brilliant essay Femininization of Mankind.
     I don't have your intellectual capacities but you have written so much to which I subscribe.
     I'm in the middle of a 2nd divorce because I had wanted a mate and wanted to believe in love.
  After 10 yrs and her throwing this word "love" around like confetti she has decided she doesn't want "it" anymore.
                 Love? I cannot believe it any longer. Good qualities such as loyalty, devotion, perseverance don't get their deserved merit. But spend your money on a woman buys some love.
       I did nothing wrong and "they", women change their mind of what she called "the love like no other".
 But I'm getting off topic.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17027
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy. Sun Feb 25, 2018 12:58 pm

I gave up on the romantic, modern definition of love and saw it as what it is.
Then I did what I had to do to get what I needed....and have no use for the rest.

There's a mating limit to lust/love.
It's the cycle of female promiscuity.
It is the time required for an offspring of the particular species to reach maturity. For humans this is around 7-8 years....ergo the 'seven year itch'.
Paternalism put a restriction of both female and male promiscuity....but paternalism is no more.
We are reverting to primal mating cycles only this time multiple by the effects of technologies, like the counteractive, the condom, and abortion.

Like obesity is the product of the human species, having evolved in more austere environments is unable to resit sugars and fats crating artificially maintained abundance and superfluity, so do these technologies exacerbate natural cycles.
The costs/risk of mating are reduced to insignificance, making promiscuity a form of gluttony....with bad repercussions.
All excess has consequences.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν


Last edited by Satyr on Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:07 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Cult_Leader

avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 33
Join date : 2017-04-27
Age : 41
Location : Scandinavia

PostSubject: Re: culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy. Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:03 pm

tautog wrote:
There should be cull teams. Maybe judge Dredds who dispense justice on site. Drop your litter, get shot.
Steal, cut off hand. Cull the losers, the idyits, the drunks , the drug addicts, criminals. White collar and blue.

Those retards are fully able to play themselves out of the big game _without_ our help, so why bother?
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://mindcontrol666.blogspot.no/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17027
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy. Sun Feb 25, 2018 2:09 pm

The problem is not the men, but the women.
Controlling females determines the fate of mankind.
They are genetic and memetic filtering agents.....he who determines their genetic/memetic filters determines the essence, the qualities, of the next generations.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Cult_Leader

avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 33
Join date : 2017-04-27
Age : 41
Location : Scandinavia

PostSubject: Re: culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy. Sun Feb 25, 2018 3:44 pm

Satyr wrote:
The problem is not the men, but the women.

On the surface it may seem so, yes. But I think "the big illusion" is divided equally between both sexes. But men and women manifest this in very different ways. At this point in history, women's manifestations seems to be more socially accepted. This may change (again) in the future.
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://mindcontrol666.blogspot.no/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 17027
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy. Sun Feb 25, 2018 3:56 pm

Yes...men must be the ideal for women.
There are inferior women and superior ones.

Superior females select superior males.



Chimpanzees settle for apes.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
OnWithTheirHead
hero


Gender : Male Posts : 514
Join date : 2017-01-05
Location : .

PostSubject: Re: culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy. Mon Apr 02, 2018 11:26 am

gafr wrote:
Existence is naturally competitive, the incentive to work which equates to survival is a good enough incentive in and of itself. Everything below this just dies, everything extremely above this also dies.
Im not sure if humans are naturally competitive, but I do know that if the competition becomes too difficult they become naturally war-like. Personally when I see all these reports of the competitive job market my natural urge is to beat the shit out of all these cucks and pleebs so that I can get the jobs I want to have. However, I am evolved to the point of knowing this is morally wrong, also I am evolved to the point where prison is total torture for my mind, so I don't.

Quote :
Can the human spirit, the life energy, the essence of what makes us what we are be captured and extracted and birthed into the robotic form? if not, then the machine remains to be a machine, regardless of how sophisticated it becomes, it still remains to be a machine..
This may be a good thing. Not a big fan of robots having human spirits, they might be war-like like us humans and destroy us all like Terminator. I am a fan of automoton robots being our slaves however.
On the other hand, a part of me wishes my consciousness would be uploaded into a beautiful robot so that I can be immortal. But the other part of me says, I am not really sure what it's like to be a robot, they may tell me its all peaches and cream, but for all I know when my consciousness is put inside of it it might feel like Im continously freezing to death, for all I know.

Quote :
Human stimulation in the context of collective competition is what gives birth to civilization, had it not been for this then the natural competition will only be shifted towards natural phenomenon.
Not sure about that. I think civilization was born from a natural desire to build shelter. You seem to conflate stuff as a competition. I think the emotions behind civilization were more about feelings of charity, glory, and security, than it was for an arena. The olypmics, sports, and videogames, are more likely made due to natural urges for competition. I think civilizations were formed by collective human cooperation, the opposite of competition. And yes outside tribes didn't always get along and tried to destroy each other's civilizations, either for reasons of disagreeing with ideals, or just trying to steal and exploit resources.

Quote :
The nature of the civilization is in contradiction of the nature that surrounds it and also the essence of the cycle of life. It's attempting to save everyone into an ideal,
I wouldn't say civilization is neccesarily in contradiction of nature. Maybe shitty american society yes. But an actual utopia would try to find harmony with nature, and would just be an evolution of nature. In many ways american society feels like a devolution to me.

Quote :
most likely robots will serve greatly in creating  a utopia on earth. Then what will become of the humans? will they not just fight? and start to kill each other..become stagnant? ill? will it not just give them more time to be preoccupied with differences among each other?
Toxic humans maybe. But most humans tend to be nice people if their needs are being met. Even the Klingons dont go around warring and killing other Klingons in times of peace. I think boredom is caused by either having a traumatic life, or simply not having anything to do. The dumb ones will find simple things to do, like sports. The smart ones will occupy their time by building, learning, and other intellectual pastimes. Serial killer types, don't really enjoy killing on a genetic level, serial killers have a cool down period between killings because they are repulsed by it. So in a utopia, if the serial killers got their needs met I doubt they would go around killing people. Spree killers are the ones who just enjoy killing. Some are born that way some aren't. The one's who aren't born that way would probably never experience the trauma to become spree killers. The one's who were born that way, would probably be killed off by some angry vigilante eventually. Now the muslim terrorist types, are different from serial or spree killers, they have some kind of psychosis. It's like they are angry and want to do violence for no reason, kind of like how Erik used to be. I think therapy would help, I think they have unacknoledged feminine needs. For instance as soon as Erik got tied up, forced to wear latex, and spanked on his ass by his girlfriend, he started to become a happy and cool calm and collected person. So it's like, the more masculine men tend to be less violent, its like they are cool just shooting pool, watching documentaries, and going to museums with their wife. Its like the masculine men can go to the gun range, and not feel this burning need to shoot people for no reason.

Quote :
wont nature still be nature after all?
Yes.

Quote :
The nature of the civilization is in contradiction of the nature that surrounds it and also the essence of the cycle of life. It's attempting to save everyone into an ideal,
Let me give an example of what I mean by a civilization that is not a contradiction, but extension of nature.
In nature the herbivore birth rate cannot exceed the birth rate of plants. But what if there was a civilization that increased the photosynthesis of plants, and the birth rate of herbivores, so that there was a limitless supply of meat and noone went hungry ever? And the herbivores would be killed humanely of course. This would be an extension of nature, natures processes improved. The herbivores benefit, they no longer have to go through torture of being eaten alive, humans never have to starve, and the sun is the glue holding it all together, the constant, giving energy, life, and utopia to all.

Quote :
There should be cull teams. Maybe judge Dredds who dispense justice on site. Drop your litter, get shot.
Steal, cut off hand. Cull the losers, the idyits, the drunks , the drug addicts, criminals. White collar and blue.
             But of course it will never be cuz the folly of humans.
Such teams would only exist due to the folly of humans. Judge Dredd types only come to exist in extreme nihilistic dystopias of misery. Thus the causal relationship is gotham city, in essence a toxic shithole and a breeding ground for criminals. The more authorative, nihilistic and stifling to the human spirit the city gets, the more criminals seem to appear out of thin air. The more organic, healthy and wholesome the city gets, the less criminals seem to appear out of thin air. Such as Andy Griffith town.
tautog wrote:
I'm in the middle of a 2nd divorce because I had wanted a mate and wanted to believe in love.
 After 10 yrs and her throwing this word "love" around like confetti she has decided she doesn't want "it" anymore.
                Love? I cannot believe it any longer. Good qualities such as loyalty, devotion, perseverance don't get their deserved merit. But spend your money on a woman buys some love.
      I did nothing wrong and "they", women change their mind of what she called "the love like no other".
But I'm getting off topic.
I feel sorry for you. I too know how you feel, it feels like society is nothing but duplicitous lies. Though, I wonder, if you had been treated better would you be wanting to go around cutting off people's hands.

Both male lust and female love are sexual in nature. Males can experience female love, these are the romantic types. Females can experience male lust, these are the hot porn star types. What you have to watch out for are the neutrals, the moderns, who lack empathy, the mentally underdeveloped, the ones who lack character. There are some females out there who simply cannot comprehend the male sex drive, they lack the empathy to. And there are some males out there who are so simple they cannot even understand what love feels like. Ironically it seems like it is usually the more masculine women who seem unable to comprehend male lust.

Now let me explain how female love and male lust are both sexual, but different. When a female falls in love she will often not have a clear explanation for why. She will just say "it just happened." However most female love is autogynephillic in nature. What she will fall in love with his how confident he is, how he makes her feel special, how he makes her feel like a beautiful woman. And she will want to be with him, he will make her feel comfortable, secure, like she is safe and cared for. She will often fantasize about being in a luxurious bedroom, or nice hotel room, being cuddled and satisfied with him. She lives in a fantasy land, because in real life, this is what will happen. She will meet him, go on a date with him, then suddenly lose interest. Maybe he did not kiss her exactly like she imagined. Maybe he was not as confident and smooth as she pictured in her fantasy. Or maybe he has a bad odor. In any case, women can be very fickle because their attraction to you is not real, it is a fantasy, they are actually in love with themselves, autogynephillia. And the moment you mess up her fantasy of what she imagines you to be, she is free'd from the spell/delusion and she just moves on to someone else.

Now there is another type of female love that is a little bit more stable than the run-of-the-mill autogynephillia. It is still autogynephillia, but different from the first type. This type is loyal female autogynephillia, ie. a woman who is obsessed with a senpai. In this type it is the woman doing the chasing, she wants him to make her feel like a woman a total loyal woman. It doesnt matter if the man is shorter than her or taller than her, she will be the dominant one doing the chasing, dominant but still feminine, emotional, and needing to be treated like a woman. And I will tell you what attracts her to a man the most. The fact that he is troubled, that there's something wrong with him, that he went through pain. Maybe he is a soldier who's usually unhappy. Or maybe he's hard and lacks emotional softness. But the more fucked up, battle-hardened, and anti-hero he is, the more she will love him. The more cucky, goodie-two-shoes and happy he is, the less attraction she will feel for him. It doesnt matter if you are strong or weak. Even if you are a cripple, she may fall in love with you. Although the one thing to avoid is being fat, don't be fat, most often it will not work.

Also, if you want the other thing to work (agp type 1), it will work even if you are poor. Just make sure you show her pictures of your house, and make sure it looks like some luxurious fantasy harem or something. Remember quality not quantiy. If you are rich but your house looks boring and sterile as hell she wont wan't to be there, also if your house looks like trash she wont want to be there either.

Now male lust is a bit different than female love (agp types 1 and 2.) In male lust, first of all males learn at an early age they cannot be mothers, then their whole life they are peer pressured into being hard and also violent. And they are also peer pressured into avoiding female things. So when they see a woman it activates a latent thing in their brain that is usually dormant. Its like all that femininity they've been missing out on, but in one convenient socially approved package. It is similar to the story of marriage, or hermaphroditus, where "We will be united as one." Now this is why most gays find it convienient to lie about their sexuality, many gays are actually bisexual and lust for female boobs. But why are they gay though? Because it is the path of least resistance. When they see a female they don't feel some overwhelming need to assimilate with her. It's like the Joker, or a Mannequin, they see a female as just a rival, encroaching on their turf, they don't feel any kind of need to worship her or view her as strange magic, because they know her enough to empathize with her. But to a straight man she is some mystical being of divine magic. Must be with her, must worship her, the stress builds. This is why wearing clothes actually increases the male sex drive, because the mystery of what's underneath drives him mad, he must see, he must find the truth. So, male lust is stress oriented, rooted in lack, need. So if you remove the stress he turns into a total faggot. And by total faggot I mean there are different degrees of faggotry, for instance a non-total faggot is a sissy who has a dominatrix, the sissy is still turned on by females, the sissy still feels stress and need. But the total faggot feels nothing, feels no stress around females. Without stress/need there can not be lust. Thus a girl can be a lesbian, if she feels stress and need around other girls.

Now you may ask, if I know all this stuff about women and romance why can't I get laid? Partially due to nihilism, people have delusions and believe lies about me and judge me. And they can't be reasoned with. The other thing is, I have a transsexual brain and whenever I try to be a man for a woman I feel a magnetic dysphoria, like I lose my confidence and feel fake. Partially this is genetic, but I think during some occasions, it is due to cultural brainwashing of males to feel shame at approaching women. Its like how in fights, even if you know the techniques you will still lose, until your mind reaches a certain level of aggression. And speaking of aggression, women are not attracted to aggression in males. They might be attracted to an asshole who calmly bullies and makes fun of them, but they are not attracted to toxic masculinity or men go around raging at other males. Now on the other hand, if you yell and scream at a woman it may stockholm her into feeling sorry for you and falling in love with you. But if you just go around looking angry she will just be afraid of you and want to get away.
”satyr” wrote:
Chimpanzees settle for apes.

Unfortunately most of the women I see in my day to day hell of a life are nowhere near me in terms of intelligence and the activities they participate in cannot hold my intellectual interest. Suffice to say it is difficult for me to make a connection with them even in a temporary sexual sense. And the intelligent ones always seem to suffer from some malignant narcissism or psychosis. Some offer the advice “fake it till you make it.” In order for a woman to feel pampered and submissive around you once should feel like a confident man. However I have no genuine desire to be a man and so when I am around these women and attempt to be intimate, I feel a distinct disconnection as if it doesn’t feel real, and that I don’t fully feel like myself. Although partially I wonder if this aversion to chatting up women is also due to the socially brainwashing males to feel intense paranoia about flirting with females.
Quote :
The problem is not the men, but the women.
Controlling females determines the fate of mankind.
They are genetic and memetic filtering agents.....he who determines their genetic/memetic filters determines the essence, the qualities, of the next generations.
I believe the highschool years are the most honest displays of human sexuality unfettered by cultural psychosis and it is the years before humans become fully complacent and obedient to the nihilistic expectations of them as an adult. In nature humans did not live much longer than age 20 and after age 20 it seems to be mostly a downhill saga.

That being said my high school years many women flirted with me and begged to have sex with me. But I refused, because they were not up to my memetic or genetic expectations, maybe they had an imperfect nose, or their ideals weren’t just as sophisticated as mine. In any case there were a couple of cute girls who flirted with me, but due to my shyness, hatred of my penis and my rampant transsexualism, I was afraid to make a move. I think also this was due to the cultural Nihilistic american brainwashing that was instilled on to me, that lust was a sin against God, and that sex was some giant cultural taboo. That being said I do regret those years and wish I could change them, but sadly there is no way to change the past and undo one’s mistakes. In those years it was the males who determined the lions share of the memetic and genetic filtering, girls tried to be pretty and “hot” to prove their worth to males. However we seem to be living in a new world-plane where males have to prove their worth to females, which is kind of odd since the females don’t really have that much desire to be with males, other than to exploit them for money. This is because females seem to be undergoing a split mind psychosis where their bedroom persona is completely removed from their public self. And as the ego of the females increases, their ego is in direct opposition with their love of males, and in fact the male ego is the primary force that makes males repulsed at the idea of sexual relations between other males.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
gafr

avatar

Gender : Female Posts : 104
Join date : 2016-05-31
Location : moon

PostSubject: Re: culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy. Mon Apr 02, 2018 6:13 pm

Quote :
Im not sure if humans are naturally competitive, but I do know that if the competition becomes too difficult they become naturally war-like. Personally when I see all these reports of the competitive job market my natural urge is to beat the shit out of all these cucks and pleebs so that I can get the jobs I want to have. However, I am evolved to the point of knowing this is morally wrong, also I am evolved to the point where prison is total torture for my mind, so I don't.

They appear to be less competitive due to environmental abundance, once that is no longer supplied then this will motivate them otherwise, even then, even in such an abundant environment people will still be competitive due to hierarchy. You would also have to factor in the spiteful nature of man. You act as if people are naturally sharing, especially if there's loads to go around. Human's hoard resources away from others even if they have more than enough. Ever saw a a married man, who has children, car, house, money, fit body and still present himself as hostile towards another man who is chatting up a girl?

Why would it be morally wrong? what alternatives are there? That IS reality, it's a do or die type of situation. You are somewhere in between hoping for the world to change. The system only keeps you alive because they think you'll eventually "do" as soon as they realize you wont, then they'll cut you off..to die. Unless you pull on their heart strings and play the sickness card to which they feel obligated to help as to support their own ideas that they promote or they'll become see through...causing riots etc. See Migration to Europe and how the migrants use the system's ideas against themselves...

The animal or beast within isn't wrong, it has to be used or you become open to destruction. This is what balance is regarding survival.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy.

Back to top Go down
 
culling methods, overpopulation, interpretations, and dispelling hypocrisy.
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1
 Similar topics
-
» Draft IRR (Bid Security for Alternative Methods)
» Review of exoplanet detection methods
» Alternative Methods of Procurement
» Methods of Grounding
» Methods of Cleansing

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: