Academia

A topic on modern academia, including all education and events within it. Talk about: its origins, history, events, cultural influence, direction and future.

Do you see trade schools and online educations like Phoenix University (you meet once a semester and take online materials) replacing the current universities?

College professors that are white: you're not immune. Your whole legacy is going to disappear - all that work you put into your doctorate and thought you were advancing humanity and would have work built on by students in the future - it will become encroached on by non-whites and injected with social justice just as is heavily being done now. You will not get the worthy adversaries you thought you deserve for your Occidental rigor.
And, if it somehow does survive, every accomplishment you made in a post-racial world will be looked at as a white one. An accomplishment by a now dead and gone race. But that's only if that happens.
The more likely scenario, with your work surviving in a nationalist white world, will be seen as a part of a Judaic trend, evidence of drawing pretty pictures and fanciful musings while you let the whole Occidental institution around you turn to rot. Immature children playing with Judaic nihilism, validating it, because of the seduction of a Cartesian level of surety in your knowledge: letting your responsibilities in simply maintaining yourself and your people to continue the perception of that knowledge disappear against an absolute - of demanding that absolute be present or demanding one countenance that absolute's absolute opposite.
The Faustian spirit acts as a universal solvent of weakness. Like a flea landing in a puddle of chlorosulfonic acid, it is quickly corroded into a mist of its very own condition and the spirit left pure. Your decadence will still serve as a smoke signal, warning the youth not to tread where you have.
A better position and a lesser offense, I'm sure, to recognize your weaknesses for the sake of strength, than to have it as if you never existed at all - and even your legacy of weakness stolen from you, and today (if you read this) the opportunity to change your course. But, this is not a suggestion from me, because I am not your keeper, to decide who you are or aren't.

Part 2 of Nelson Rosit's review of Christian Smith on sociology: "There has been a 180 degree turn on social issues, especially involving race and sex" from early 20th century when sociologists were influenced by Darwin. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Hypocrisy – “For a discipline obsessed with social inequality as a moral wrong American sociology turns out to be just as structured & driven by status hierarchy, rankings, elitism, excluding social processes, and protection of privilege as just about any other institution”

— Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Academia is now part of the propaganda infrastructure.
It promotes and supports academics as a corporation vets and then promotes management.
Fortunately this disease is still contained in the America dominated "west" - a iron curtain of hypocrisy and degeneracy cultivated by the manipulation of language.

Many academics today are professional liars who tell their students that Alexandria was "an African library" even though it was created by white Greeks, and every scientist in this library was Greek: Aristarchus, Eratosthenes, Galen, Strabo, Archimedes...[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Dr. Ricardo Duchesne (@DuchesneRicardo) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Notice how the ambiguity of the word 'African', is at play here.
A manmade distinction - a meme, an idea, a political category - also implies a racial distinction - genes, a biological category.
It is embedded in the young mind that Africans did have a culture of note....when in fact the Africans never did.
This is how the confusion of meme/genes, using linguistic games, can produce a often welcomed delusion that is difficult to challenge.
A degenerated mind is unable to break free from its state.

Could it be a product of (((marketing)))?

Isn't it ironic, or in accordance with a pattern, that theoretical physics would have a Jew as its icon?
Theoretical physics is about ideology - noumena.
Applied physics is about reality, empiricism - phenomena.

The Crisis of Identity, as they call it, is directly related to this current disease of idealism, usurping realism.
A theory need only be consistent in relation to itself but not necessarily in relation to reality, or the observable world.

When was the last time Western civilization had a moral crisis and said: “By God, we better get an academic philosopher in here RIGHT NOW!” ? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Stefan Molyneux (@StefanMolyneux) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Looks like molyneux found a cleverly evasive and inventive way to mock himself. The boy is learning the ropes of human pretension.

Fucking molyneux. He's like an annoying neighbor in an all white neighborhood. You can't stand the guy, but you are at least grateful that he's white.

If you really want to see what molyneux is read his book on philosophy, it's called an introduction to philosophy or something like that, I think a white cover

No thanks. I already know what he is.

we both do, That book is so bad I actually decided to stop watching anything intellectual on YouTube or anywhere else because of it.

Yes. Youtube is an oratorical communication medium. Relying strictly on the use of verbal exposition, and relegating the activity of thinking and contemplation. This is why every jackoff and their mother can go on there and believe they are a voice of reason because, despite having no cultivated skill in abstract thought or logic, they have the primitive faculty of practical language with some vague sense of their place in the world, and they can share this plight, uninterrupted, (which allows them to be comfortable in their thoughts, and bolsters confidence) and reinforce a feeling of importance and brilliance. It is an age reverted back to oratory, only now with an unlimited access to literature, which compounds the idiocy, irony, and intellectual indolence because everyone falls back on an authority, unable to think on their own, not understanding that books or reading material are simply tools for growing awareness, not absolute ends or answers. Moreover, they cannot think, without the reciprocation of another prompting them to formulate thoughts, they would never have without feedback or exchange, thinking by taking their cues from others. Immersing themselves in sociability in order to stay relevant.

They are like salesmen. If they can utter 100 idiotic or inane things, with the guarantee that at least a few of them will land on some common sense that everyone can relate to, they feel intelligent and that they are making a difference.

Real thinking must occur in solitude, in the efforts of one’s own ability to reflect and understand, away from the rabble and noise. Even the exceptional thinkers on these mediums, still require us to hear them through the obnoxious noise of the mindless blabber of every other moron with a superiority complex. And the noise gets to be intolerable.

Imagine how these Youtuber 'sages' and 'oracles' would fair to be in the silence of their own feelings and thoughts for a long period of time, and i mean years or even most of their lives. One of my maxims regarding this is that it is easier to look at oneself in the mirror than in solitude. It is more comfortable to feel the company of another in shared identity and thoughts, then to pit those thoughts on their own in reality, like constructing a kite and letting it loose in the air, exposed to the merciless elements.

I think they are salesman 100%, some of the things he says he can't believe himself or think are true, like that all females have a built in attraction to serial killers, I have actually taken this seriously because it sounded somewhat possible in a non-literal sense(as applicable to ALL females), and found a sketchy pseudo-scientific Jew fraudian that spouted this nonsense to his female patients in New York(and was the sole inventor and proponent of this 'theorhy') and based it on a single book that I then red and nowhere in it did it say that all females have an attraction to serial killers and 'dark-triad' personalities(as understood by the negative connotation of that word) but that a variety of fetishes manifest themselves(but not universally and linearly) through human stock to allow for increased, non-standard sexual attraction and so a motivation to copulate with a wider variety of partners in a wider variety of austere and non-standard, and incodusive to child rearing settings... So to reverse engineer this, you have a serious academic work that implies a deviation from the norm, but doesn't suggest it as 100 reliable and accurate, in humans to varying degrees, you get a Jew twist it to use it to sell issues to white females, and few decades later you get neo-nazis and incels using the 'basic idea' that they opinionate to be 'true' to propose radical sexual role formats and convince virgins that females are deeply fucked in the heads...you could not make this shit up...

I am not a soft faggot, play with ideas, test them, see where you go... claim that females are 'strong', claim that Slavics are racially deeply inferior to the rest of the Europe, that 9/11 was an inside job, as in with the bombs and insurance aspect, or that faggots are superior step in evolution or whatever, go in whichever direction you want, but take it seriously and hold yourself accountable,investigate it, write it out, present it, thats why I like artists, because they play with life but take it seriously and are thorough(unlike 90 percent of alt-right)...so in a way I have nothing against different kinds of charlatans and nutters, sometimes a nutter can change your perspective in a way you could not...

This is all about doing away with the past. We could call post-modern thought the 60's counter-cultural revolution of philosophy. Undermining all values for a hedonistic sense of selfhood.

Even animals abide by "foundations" of being based on survival. The post-modern "philosopher" is the hippie version of an intellectual. The other side of the primitive self-indulgent spectrum.