Why loners are the future

It is simple: in decadence you are losing power, and losing power is the obligatory 'culture'. You are being bombed by losers who are overwhelmed by emotions and who demand an appropriate response to their emotions. If you don't play the game you will be isolated by the herd.
Did they isolate you or did you isolate yourself is not a matter of subject but of energy. You must refuse in order to save your energy.

Also intelligence seems to play a significant role. All intelligent people are introverted. Your brainpower does not allow you to focus too much toward losers.

Is morality important? Master morality is a demand from strong people to keep standards which save their energy. This standards must be kept with force or violence. Become hard ...

The birth of a culture depends on how many loners are available to form a new nation. Loners are being destroyed by the herd and isolated. Remember the meme by Nietzsche

The superior is drained by the inferior; the inferior is invigorated by the superior.
Power balance.
The degree of divergence determines the degree one is drained or invigorated.

Introverts have little need for others to remain vital, and so all social interactions are fatiguing.
Extroverts have need for validation to remain vital, and so social interactions energize them.

In these systems of multiplicities - forcefully homogenized strangers - acquittances are necessary for networking.
Isolation is only healthy and possible if the individual has managed to extricate himself form the socioeconomic and sexual, field of competition.

The "birth or preservation of culture" depends on genetic & memetic homogeneity.

The herd always pressures the loner to contribute by threatening to exclude it from the herd and from the future, via female agency, denying it participation in future generations - ostracize.
Females are genetic/memetic filtering agencies.

In decadence there is no balance of power, only loss of power. There is no competition since the rules for competitions don't exist. The only way toward accumulating power is to establish a new order in form of values and hierarchies of powers. You need a parallel society in the sense of a new Republic in order to set up rules.
You need to break history in two in order to stop the loss, the decay of power.

At the moment where you accept the injustice of equality and freedom you have admitted your defeat and allowed those 75% of extroverts, energy vampires, to overvote you. Don't you feel the loss of respect when then bite you in your neck? Don't you see how they steal, falsify, lie, cheat and hate you? Yes, 75% of people are extroverted democrats who will tell you "oh, how you are doing well" before they start to suck your energy.

There is only one way into future: Nitimur in vetitum!

The point of inversion is language.
Detach it from the experienced world and you've created a weapon to assault reality and those who wish to engage it and not flee or change it.

Since you seem particularly sensitive to energy vampires...
Energy vampirism is not particular to extroversion but it is most often a part of it.

Introversion focuses adaptation on oneself.
The individual adapts to reality.

Extroverts focus this adaptation on another.
The others must adapt to them - the world must be adapted to them.
Democracies benefit extroverts.

Yes, or to truth. The bonds between introverts are stronger, because there is more tru(e)st. Yet, alone they fall.

Extroverts seek difference in another to escape themselves.
Introverts seek similarity in another to encase themselves.
Trust is based on consistent reliability.
Extroverts must trust themselves to push further: fleeing self by engaging, i.e., fighting otherness.
Introverts must trust another to bring closer: fighting self by disengaging, i.e., fleeing otherness.

That is not so simple. Introverts don't flee anybody if not outnumbered.

Aren't they always outnumbered around extroverts?