Evolution Theory and History contradict your dogmatic, nihilistic, ideological byllshyte.
-Environment does not only affect organisms physically. Different environment affect populations differently - more challenging environments, for example, pressure organisms to do to die, pushing on natural selection; less challenging environments, such as where a species originates, produce less pressures to change. Ergo, sub-Saharan negroes never produced any civilization comparable to Egypt, China, Mesopotamia etc. The tribes they forced to immigrate out of these less challenging environments into more challenging environments were put under more pressure, and they evolved, their offspring returning as conquerors.
-Species evolve through mediating stages due to genetic isolation. Human races being such intermediating genealogical stages. If there are no races, there is no human evolution. God did it.
-Stress forces adaptation. Where there is no necessity there is no progress. Adapt or die. More challenging, stressful, environments impose adaptive pressures upon those living within them. A muscle must be stressed to grow; if it is not it atrophies - same for the brain.
You can buy into whatever lies you want to make yourself feel better.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Freyja
Gender : Posts : 141 Join date : 2022-09-16 Location : Many moons away
You believe that (and there is not a shred of evidence to support the hypothesis) life began in an organic soup here on earth.
The human cell is the most complex machine known in the universe and you are suggesting that life itself may have been produced in some "warm little pond".
You can buy into whatever lies you want to make yourself feel better.
Freyja
Gender : Posts : 141 Join date : 2022-09-16 Location : Many moons away
"Of Ethiopia, which is strategically located in the Horn of Africa, Herodotus gives a compact description: "this country produces great quantities of gold, has an abundance of elephants and all the woodland trees, and ebony; and its men are the tallest, the most handsome, and the longest lived." Homer, in the beginning of theOdyssey, had mentioned Zeus' feasting with the "blameless" Ethiopians, a poetic tradition which may have encouraged Herodotus to place in their land such wondrous spectacles as the famous"table of the sun", a meadow which, by its own accord, supplies the people with all kinds of boiled meat, perhaps a variant of the Homeric theme of the gods feasting with the Ethiopians, as well as of the Hesiodic myth of the age of gold, when gods and mortals still dwelt together and shared the same banquets. When the Persian king Cambyses offers the Ethiopian king gifts--a purple cloak,golden ornaments, and perfumes--the king calls them "deceitful", because dye disguises real colors and perfumes, real smells. He characterizes the gold necklace and bracelets as fetters. Cambyses naively attempts to apply the laws of the ordinary in a country of the extraordinary: gold is so abundant there that it is not even considered precious. Conventional perfumes are meaningless, since the water of the spring of youth smells as exquisite as if it were infused with violets."
The Kingdom of Kush was an ancient kingdom in Nubia, centered along the Nile Valley in what is now northern Sudan and southern Egypt.
Before the dawn of history the people were working in metals and they perfected the tools. If you are to ever pass through the British Museum in the Nubian section you will see they used every single material and they did have a vast level of pottery and all different colours and designs and shapes. The people of Sudan used every single material at their disposal to make things from wood copper, bronze gold ivory.
Anfang
Gender : Posts : 3989 Join date : 2013-01-23 Age : 40 Location : Castra Alpine Grug
Herodotus wrote in Book 3 of “Histories”: “I went as far as Elephantine [Aswan] to see what I could with my own eyes, but for the country still further south I had to be content with what I was told in answer to my questions. South of Elephantine the country is inhabited by Ethiopians...Beyond the island is a great lake, and round its shores live nomadic tribes of Ethiopians. ...
A nomadic people, alright. Btw. Aswan is in today's Egypt, so everything beyond that is what he was told by other people. But let's see what they tell him...
Quote :
The Ethiopians to whom this embassy was sent are said to be the tallest and handsomest men in the whole world. In their customs they differ greatly from the rest of mankind, and particularly in the way they choose their kings; for they find out the man who is the tallest of all the citizens, and of strength equal to his height, and appoint him to rule over them....
"The Ethiopians to whom this embassy was sent..." - so those particular Ethiopians were the tallest and handsomest, kind of sounds like that if we read the rest. Who was it that claimed they are the tallest and most handsomest in the whole world? I have to assume someone in 'Ethiopia' made that claim, probably those particular Ethiopians claimed it about themselves.
You see, apparently they choose their king by how tall he is. It also sounds like being tall (and strong by implication) is the key ingredient in how handsome one is deemed to be, in that place. You also get to be king.
It could be worse, height being the determining factor in your social status isn't so bad. It could also be the size of their dicks. Still, far better than modern Westerners who believe in the idea of racial equality.
It also makes sense, frankly. This is a kind of social status principle that is believable to me for a Black society. This is what a Black society, free of White man's influence, could look like.
Quote :
The Ethiopians were clothed in the skins of leopards and lions, and had long bows made of the stem of the palm-leaf, not less than four cubits in length. On these they laid short arrows made of reed, and armed at the tip, not with iron, but with a piece of stone, sharpened to a point, of the kind used in engraving seals. They carried likewise spears, the head of which was the sharpened horn of an antelope; and in addition they had knotted clubs.
Oh nooo, this account sounds so rayycccised! - in other words, runs counter to modern social engineering goals.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37241 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
When you made this thread, what did you hope to accomplish?
That you'd convince a bunch of philosophers the supremacy of Sub-Saharan African basket weaving, and that racial Europeans would fall over backward to a cheap political slogan, that "All Lives Matter" even though nobody truly believes this or even pretends to on a daily basis?
If a person doesn't even care about his/her own life, has no Pride in himself, then why should I assume he cares about others?
What would such 'care' look like, cheap donations, a cup full of pennies to a beggar on a street?
What constitutes 'Loving' another person, let alone yourself? Is Respect involved, and what does that look like?
Why should I parent children, orphans, who are not my own biologically? Why should I betray my Ethnicity?
...better yet, why am I asking you??
(hint: boredom)
Freyja
Gender : Posts : 141 Join date : 2022-09-16 Location : Many moons away
It's what feminine minds do, they try to find your "buttons" and then test their find by pushing them and analyzing your reaction - then they adjust and push again. I once used the metaphor of a woman riding a stallion using her spurs to control a powerful beast, feeling powerful when she accomplished her goal. It's the method of the feeble using proxies to compensate for their insecurities and weaknesses. Power through proxies. Controlling a male is a empowering aphrodisiac for females. It's why they always try to make men expose their vulnerabilities, to them alone and nobody else. They want a man to expose his buttons for her to control him and through this control achieve her socioeconomic or reproductive objectives.
Females evolved the ability to 'read people' because this is their primary source of power, other than her reproductive role and her control over the ovum. Sex, itself, is a form of manipulation. attractive women use it to trigger males and make them do what they want them to. If that is impossible, or they fail at it, then the second option is to 'get under their skin' by 'reading a male's vulnerable spots to spur. Emasculated males also do this.
Indeed, I'm curious why she brought her Social Justice Warrior crusade here, to this platform though, particularly. Does she believe she's winning ground? Getting under the skin, as you say? Provocation? Does she really believe in this bullshit? She could have chose any infinite number of philosophical topics, yet, this is the one and the basis for her crusade. Perhaps she believes this is her best lever of power.
If a woman cannot convince men philosophically, then social justice and political power are her next gambit.
Shame is her way to notoriety? Her rewards are twofold, one if she can bend any weak mind under her social justice prerogative, two if she is convinced otherwise then it absolves her own "white guilt", win-win for her.
Her reward is this....we talking about her, giving her attention she cannot receive any other way. She's already won, in her mind, because her provocation worked.
Other women provoke using their physical attributes, other women use their insight into male psychology to trigger them.... In her mind this trigger worked. It's about getting a reaction - this is her 'truth': pragmatic, not theoretical. She feels empowered when she makes a male react. She'll try to find another trigger and test it, using what she understands of a man's views and motives.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Kultur
Gender : Posts : 234 Join date : 2021-02-14 Location : Faustian Land
Scottish philosopher David Hume: ‘I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There scarcely ever was a civilised nation of that complexion, nor even any individual, eminent either in action or in speculation. No ingenious manufacture among them, no arts, no sciences.’
Whilst some changed slightly over time, there were still some who continued to hold these views.
In the 19th century, the German philosopher Hegel simply declared: ‘Africa is no historical part of the world.’
Later, Hugh Trevor-Roper, Regius Professor of History at Oxford University, expressed openly the racist view that Africa has no history, as recently as 1963.
The revolutionary Amilcar Cabral from Guinea-Bissau wrote "colonial force required not only military control but also an ideological conquest and this necessitated the undermining of older histories and cultures on the continent".
What "Amilcar Cabral" says is a lie.
When we talk about history and culture, we mean exclusively the high cultures as history cultures, that is, the history of the cultures that have history - and also civilizations - and these are exclusively the high cultures.
So what Hume, Hegel and, much later, Trevor-Roper said was correct - it was the prevailing linguistic rule at that time, and basically this linguistic rule has not yet been changed ("overturned" "revolutionized"). It should not be changed in the future either. Otherwise every and every culture would really be finished and the world would be back to a primitive life. According to the globalists, this dominant rule of language is to be changed with linguistic weapons of war, and one of them is "Black Lives Matter". Those are racists that bring "Black Lives Matter" on Earth or/and believe in it. Hume, Hegel and Trevor-Roper meant by "Africa" the "Black Africa", so not the Non-Black Africa (Egypt, Carthage, the rest of North Africa).
It does not make much difference whether animals fight among themselves or whether Negro tribes in Africa, Indian tribes in North America, Aborigines in Australia, New Zealand, New Guinea, the Pacific Islands and in all jungles fight each other. The biggest difference to them is the one that we have been experiencing since historically short time: a tiny group of people have been playing with the rest of the people, as if they were chess pieces, of which only pawns shall remain. They give the instructions to the whole historical game, to the history on this globe (even parts of the natural history - see: highly technical wars of the most disgusting and terrible kind, environmental pollution, weather production, earthquake production etc., space pollution).
So it is out of question what "Black Lives Matter" really means. "Black Lives Matter" means "White Lives Shall Not Matter". It grew out of the same finality thinking as similar slogans that are just as false and only meant to suggest, to make lies seem like "truth," e.g.: "Female Lives Matter" (means: "Male Live s Shall Not Matter") or "Homosexual And Gender Lives Matter" (means: "Heterosexual And Sexually Normal Lives Shall Not Matter") or "Proletarian Lives Matter" (means: "Bourgeois-Capitalist Lives Shall Not Matter") or "Progressive Lives Matter" (means: "Conservative Lives Shall Not Matter") or "Bourgeois Lives Matter" (means: "Aristocratic/Noble Lives Shall Not Matter"). And every time it turns out to be a lie, and those who created all these false advertising slogans do not want to be affected by them themselves - if one leaves aside being gay, pederastic, privileged, super rich, super-mighty etc. -, because they are male and White.
"Black Lives Matter" is a declaration of war and a weapon of war at the same time - as we know it from history, e.g. from Western history during the conquest of North America by the Europeans, when the "Indians" declared war on them by digging up a hatchet called "war hatchet" and at the same time using hatchets for the war itself. They themselves had no history - and this is also true for the Black Africans and many others, who were and are also at the stage of primitive culture (this cannot be changed anymore, because by now the whole globe has been historicized!). Fact. Historical fact, thus something which can never be changed any more.
In order to change these facts at least apparently, there is only the possibility to change the words "history" and "culture" in such a way that the impression is created as if all cultures are to be valued equally, which does not correspond however to the reality. Also animals have already culture, even if in primitive way. People without high culture have also only a primitive culture. This is not meant pejoratively at all. But it is like this. Fact! So Hume and even more so Hegel, even much later Trevor-Roper were right with what they claimed.
"X Lives Matter" and all the other semantic (thus: linguistic!) wars are waged not only because of the pure linguistic forms, but also and especially in order to create relations, which shall make 99,9999% of the humans completely dependent on 0,0001% of the humans. The main means for this is the divide-and-rule strategy. First they have separated the bourgeois from the rest, in order to be able to fight the nobility/aristocracy more effectively; then they have separated the workers (proletarians) from the rest, in order to be able to fight the so-called "capitalist", by which the bourgeois is meant, more effectively; then they have separated the women from the rest, in order to be able to fight the men more effectively; at about the same time they they started to separate the Non-Whites from the rest, in order to be able to fight the whites more effectively; then they have separated the alleged sexless and sex selectors, including even and increasingly children, from the rest, in order to be able to fight the normals and adults more effectively (so at last there will be no one who is capable of resisting). And in each time and case the world rulers became richer and more powerful whereas the goup of resistance became poorer and smaller. This has reached already a very terrible dimension.
So if this comes true, there will be no single adult, no single male, no single White, no single aristocrat, no single bourgeois, no single bourgeois-capitalist (i.e.: no middle class); but there will be only children (thus: with no parents), women (thus: not as adults), Non-Whites and precarious workers (who can easily be replaced by machines).
So whoever names "Black Lives Matter" supports the war aganist the Whites until all Whites are dead and with it a world that will be very primitive again - for 99.9999% of all humans then living at all.
Giorgia Meloni said: "Why is the family an enemy? Why is the family so frightening? There is a single answer to all these questions. Because it defines us. Because it is our identity. Beacuse everything that defines us is now an enemy for those who would like us to no longer have an identity and to simply be perfect consumers slaves. And so they attack national identity, they attack religious identity, they attack gender identity, they attack familiy identity. I can’t define myself as an Italian, Christian, woman, mother. No. I must be citizen X, gender X, parent 1, parent 2. I must be a number. Because when I am only a number, when I no longer have an identity or roots, then I will be the perfect slave at the mercy of financial speculators. The perfect consumer. .... – We will defend God, country and family. .... We will do it to defend our freedom. Because we will never be slaves and simple consumers at the mercy of the financial speculators."
Kultur
Gender : Posts : 234 Join date : 2021-02-14 Location : Faustian Land
You do exactly what the world rulers do. On the one hand, you proceed according to the divide-and-rule strategy, and on the other hand, you seek allies because the world rulers themselves are of very, very, very small numbers. The world rulers belong to the upper class, which is very small, and those who are supposedly also disadvantaged belong to the lower class and are therefore the ideal ally, because they let the number become larger by this alliance, while the world rulers promise them (but of course never keep this promise) to help them by causing the states and thus their middle class, the only class which pays taxes and is without exception occidental, to take in immigrants and to take other measures, which however in the end all only lead to the fact that only (! ) the upper class becomes even richer and thus even more mighty, and that until there is no middle class left. That is behind the campaign against the Whites (only the Occidental middle class people are meant!). After that the upper class can only slaughter itself.
And to disguise your own ethnicity, you choose the name of a Germanic goddess as a pseudonym. But well, it is a pseudonym, thus a false name.
Kultur
Gender : Posts : 234 Join date : 2021-02-14 Location : Faustian Land
And to disguise your own ethnicity, you choose the name of a Germanic goddess as a pseudonym. But well, it is a pseudonym, thus a false name.
How complicated (and unnecessary) you perceive this world.
In fact, I borrowed one of my dog's name for my Avatar.
Shieldmaiden. Does she also think that attack is the best defense?
Freyja herself is the one who only complicates everything unnecessarily. Why does she do that? Well, because by insinuating something like that to others, she is trying to free herself from that insinuation. She distracts - unintentionally or intentionally - from the facts, from the truth.
Freyja complicates completely unnecessarily, e.g. also when she compares Sloterdijk with Ignatius of Loyola or even with Ron Hubbard, as Freyja has done in two posts. Why does she complicate something that factually does not need to be complicated at all?
Well, there are two actual reasons:
1.) She is too dumb to even know what she is talking about. 2.) She goes after a strategy, by distracting from the facts, the truth (see above).
All other reasons in this case are grouped around these two main reasons.
Hume and the other philosophers she mentioned are also unnecessarily complicated or simply not understood by Freyja, because she is obviously too stupid.
Hume, for example, who was also one of the classical philosophers of the Faustian culture, said (and Freyja quoted it):
"I am apt to suspect the Negroes to be naturally inferior to the Whites. There scarcely ever was a civilised nation of that complexion, nor even any individual, eminent either in action or in speculation. No ingenious manufacture among them, no arts, no sciences.“
Hume was right. Guest too, because:
Guest wrote:
"Q: What do you get when you cross a Nigger with a Gorilla?
A: A Dumb Gorilla."
There is nothing but stupidity that characterizes the Negroes. Only a natural-culture, that is a primitive-culture. No high-culture, no writing, thus no science (not even a teeny tiny one), therefore no history (history is high-culture history), but only natural-"history“. Natural cultures are embedded in nature like the culture of the animals. Yes! Animals have also already culture, but just only a natural one - like the black humans.
Where does Freyja live? In heaven? How old is she (or is she it?)? Why does she think in such a Negro-like way? Or is she a Negro? Does she think she can live a life with or without Negroes in the future? Does she think at all? she is very Negro-friendly, isn’t she? Is this all not a strategy (see above), albeit a very simple one? It is a primitive one - fitting the primitive-culture of the Negroes.
Because they are only close to nature, the Negroes reproduce faster than all other people. The Negroes, because they are very poor because of their stupidity (very low intelligence, the lowest IQ), must go where the intelligence-based wealth is. As immigrants, they only settle in rich countries and rich houses and steal everything there. Also in Freyja’s homeland and house? Or is this really "poor“ Freyja just greedy for the heritage because of being a daughter of the globalists, the world rulers?
Kultur
Gender : Posts : 234 Join date : 2021-02-14 Location : Faustian Land
A Negro once said: "Jesus was a Negro." - All Non-White people, out of selfishness, tend to overestimate themselves, to exaggerate, because they are inferior to Whites and try to compensate for their inferiority by, among other things, believing in lies that offer them this compensation.
The Negro Bob Marley meant that all people came from Africa, although he did not mean this scientifically (because as already said: Negroes do not know science), but in the sense mentioned above: as an expression for the desire to compensate for one’s own inferiority. A sentence follows from this: "And if you come from Switzerland, you are an African!"
The other day I read in the web: "Now it is out: The first Europeans were black with blue eyes" (??). A lie! But here exactly that wish to compensate for inferiority of the Blacks and other Non-Whites is fulfilled. In truth, "European" is not a mere biological, genetic term, but a term of the mix of genetic and geographical circumstances, thus a cultural term, just as the name "Europe" is not based on biology or genetics, but on something cultural, high-cultural, namely on science and history, i.e. high-culture, and on its roots that are a mix of genetic and geographical causes: Intelligence and climate that drove intelligence ever higher and higher, especially in the north and west of Europe.
The next lie will come soon: "Now it is proven: The Ancient Greeks and Romans were Blacks." Then: "Now it is proven: All Europeans who lived before 1945 were Blacks. Only Adolf Hitler was not a Black and wanted the Blacks to become Whites." And Freyja can then add her lie: "Ignatius of Loyola, Heinrich Himmler and Ron Hubbard were Blacks, but refused to be Blacks, and Peter Sloterdijk and some KTS guys want to be like Ignatius, Himmler and Hubbard." But she will not do that, because it is against the strategy of the globalists. She will always bow to their dictates. Their commands are her "free will".
It does not matter at all whether all people came once from Africa or not, because also the people who are supposedly lived in Africa at that time were in any case not those who lived there e.g. 4000 years ago, and even less the ones who live there today. We do not say either that we descend from the amoeba, and nevertheless reasons could be led for it that it is right. What is this? It is completely irrelevant for us as high-culture-people and also for the high-culture itself.
Such Anti-White rhetoric serves only the purpose - the strategy - of making us disappear, and it is known (can be read in the books of the world rulers themselves and on the web) that this is to be enforced with the help of Non-Whites.
The main time of racism was not before, but is today! And this racism is an Anti-White racism!
Kultur
Gender : Posts : 234 Join date : 2021-02-14 Location : Faustian Land
These girls were all murdered by immigrants and not a single member of the white male ruling class in England, Germany, Sweden, or France, has defended them. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— Dr. Ricardo Duchesne (@dr_duchesne) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Yes. And the comfortable and cozy traitors (among them are also, for example, Freyja, the KTS-Kropotkin, some others of this forum, and about 80% of ILP) have nothing better to do than to deflect from this by making those who killed these white people out to be victims and to "have a culture".
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37241 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
These are the types that seek a herd to belong to. Whatever is popular, in any age, is where you will find them congregating. Virtue signaling is their braying calls, informing others who and where they are....to be rescued.
Moderns - Americanised westerners - have no sense of identity - they are too miscegenated and have adopted Americanism's 'culture-of-no-culture' that makes culture a product to be purchased by anyone who has the cash. Money is how you show your loyalty to the system and are rewarded for it, giving you access to these products. So, if you prove yourself to the system will reward you with money; money will give you product options, such as cultural options. Money is messiah. You are saved if you worship the god - collective, i.e., system. Your god shows its appreciation by offering you its codes (logos) - a blessing. Popularity is god's appreciation, translated to cash.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37241 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
All biological (genetics) or cultural (memetics) sources of identity are to be undermined and gradually eroded down to a fashion option. A common-denominator will be used as the collective identifier....a code, referring to life's commno-denominator, i.e., need/desire. Need = lack Desire = by-product of need - libidinal, excess. Hedonism acquires a spiritual ecstatic experience - god showing his appreciation, his approval, through his earthly representative - messiah - money.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Kultur
Gender : Posts : 234 Join date : 2021-02-14 Location : Faustian Land
These are the types that seek a herd to belong to. Whatever is popular, in any age, is where you will find them congregating. Virtue signaling is their braying calls, informing others who and where they are....to be rescued.
Moderns - Americanised westerners - have no sense of identity - they are too miscegenated and have adopted Americanism's 'culture-of-no-culture' that makes culture a product to be purchased by anyone who has the cash. Money is how you show your loyalty to the system and are rewarded for it, giving you access to these products. So, if you prove yourself to the system will reward you with money; money will give you product options, such as cultural options. Money is messiah. You are saved if you worship the god - collective, i.e., system. Your god shows its appreciation by offering you its codes (logos) - a blessing. Popularity is god's appreciation, translated to cash.
Absolutely agreed.
Kultur
Gender : Posts : 234 Join date : 2021-02-14 Location : Faustian Land
All biological (genetics) or cultural (memetics) sources of identity are to be undermined and gradually eroded down to a fashion option. A common-denominator will be used as the collective identifier....a code, referring to life's commno-denominator, i.e., need/desire. Need = lack Desire = by-product of need - libidinal, excess. Hedonism acquires a spiritual ecstatic experience - god showing his appreciation, his approval, through his earthly representative - messiah - money.
Heinrich Heine (1797-1856) wrote:
Geld ist der Gott unserer Zeit, und Rothschild ist sein Prophet. (Translation: Money is the god of our time, and Rothschild is its prophet.)
Freyja
Gender : Posts : 141 Join date : 2022-09-16 Location : Many moons away
It took you some time but the rage that comes out is your mask slipping and you getting a good look at (the narcissist) that is deep beneath the facade you have perfected for the world.
Absolutely zero skill in coping or handling anything that isn’t in accordance with your mental masturbation.
You have created your own story, 'Kulture is superior in every way'. This is simply untrue and as you fear one day you will be unmasked.
You are right to be fearful, you have insulted the black man in every way possible.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37241 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
