If globalism continues to succeed, there will be an unipolar world. But given that China is growing and the US is shrinking, will this be more likely to be possible with China or with the US? Or is the multipolar world the better solution? But even then, the same question arises.
Dr. Ricardo Duchesne wrote:
America was conceived as a synthesis of 4 traditions: 1) classic Greek philosophy with its standard of human perfectibility, 2) Roman republican government and rational law, 3) Christian/Protestant morals, 4) Germanic aristocratic ethos of honor and primordial freedom. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
He added:
Dr. Ricardo Duchesne wrote:
But ... the Germanic side was rejected after WWII; Christianity was transmuted into "Judeo-Christianity", the Greek-Roman side was turned into "Mediterranean Studies", and black slavery was elevated as "original sin", with Mestizos + Asians set to replace the Anglo leftovers.
And then Mark Sanders added:
Mark Sanders wrote:
Where the Germans go, prosperity goes.
And that is precisely what is a thorn in the side of the so-called "globalists". They want the prosperity for themselves, because they want the power over everybody and everything, and therefore they have to extend their power more and more, and therefore they have to punish others, especially those who care not only for the own but also for the prosperity of the others. The "globalists" want everyone (everyone!) to be dependent on them. With the means they have at their disposal, they eliminate anyone who dares not bow to their goals. They want the huge profits for themselves alone. Therefore, they destroy everything that stands in the way of this goal.
They need warriors, because they need wars, because they need money for their power expansion. They need troublemakers, chaotic people, anarchists, nihilists, etc. for any kind of wars, because they need money for their power expansion. They need stupid people whose bodies they can make sick, because they need money for their power expansion.
The globalists know that the machines (including AI) replace more and more humans and that therefore humans are only needed as dependents (slaves) of the "products" of these very machines controlled by the globalists to ensure the expansion of power of the globalists. By the way, the globalists have never invented something or done something for others’ prosperity, but only for their own prosperity.
They will fight themselves sometime so much among themselves - probably they do this already now massively -, that finally none of them will remain. There are examples of this from history: the Caesars in Rome in the period after the Punic Wars. Among these Caesars, Caesar was the most famous, but just not the only one. They did not have the technology, because first we had to come to invent and develop it - up to where we are now, where the globalists have it, although they themselves did not invent and develop it at all, but just those Germanic people, above all Germans, who brought the prosperity probably beginning with the monks in the monasteries, but at the latest with Gutenberg’s book printing in 1445 [the later industrialization also goes back to Gutenberg's book printing]).
Why were the 4 traditions mentioned by Duchesne destroyed in the USA after the 2nd World War? Well, from the point of view of the globalists, they were no longer needed. The globalists (or whatever you want to call them) have never identified themselves with the United States of America; they have always been concerned with their own cause (money as a means to power); this could not have been otherwise; otherwise they would never have come to power (the world power!). They became powerful by wars, which are only business for them; and after the Germans lost a lot by the 2nd world war, the globalists had first of all gained a lot of money, thus power and free space for their next goals.
Until 1945 the Germans were at least 3 generations ahead of their foreign competitors (at that time they were almost only from the USA) in all fields of knowledge and technology. Related to the question, why the 4 traditions mentioned by Duchesne were destroyed in the USA after the 2nd World War, especially the war technology is of importance. Therefore, only the most important German examples of war technologyof that time are mentioned here, which, by the way, are also very useful for non-war technology ("civil technology"):
1935-’37
Wernher Magnus Maximilian Freiherr von Braun (in close cooperation with the team of Ernst H. Heinkel and the test pilot Erich K. Warsitz) invented the new rocket technology with which the gravity of the planet Earth could be overcome for the first time, thus leaving the planet Earth and traveling the universe (von Braun had two highlights: his rocket itself in the 1930s and the first moon landing, which would not have been feasible without von Braun’s technology, in July 1969). Von Braun’s rockets/missiles were used as "Vergeltungswaffen" (retaliatory weapons) - V1 and V2 - during the 2nd World War, hitting many cities of, for example, England, Holland, Belgium, France and also some in the USA. Wernher’s youngest brother Magnus Hans Alexander Maximilian Freiherr von Braun was a chemical engineer and also a rocket designer.
1938
Otto E. Hahn (in cooperation with his assistent Friedrich Wilhelm Straßmann) discovered nuclear fission, a precondition i.a. for the construction of the atomic bomb.
1938-’45
Werner K. Heisenberg and Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker built the atomic bomb. The written instructions for this got into the hands of the U.S. secret service before the end of the war, so that the atomic bomb could still be built in the U.S. and then dropped on Japan, against which the war continued until August 1945.
1939-’45
Other "Wunderwaffen" ("miracle weapons") invented by many other researchers and/or technicians and developed up to the perfection, which fell at the end of the war likewise into the hands of the US secret services (and probably also partly into the hands of the English and Soviet secret services), although they all have problems until today to really completely understand this technology, particularly that of the unmanned aerial missiles.
1940
Konrad E. O. Zuse invented and built the first computer in the world. It was as well used in the 2nd World War. The success of the German Navy, especially the U-boats, was also and especially related to this first computer in the world.
The forerunners of those who are called globalists today had the goal to let the two powers Germany (German Reich) and USA, of which only one could become the successor of the English Empire, which was already at the end at that time, clash in a war, which should be a world war again if possible, in order to be able to make business with and through the war as well as fat prey in Germany, if it should lose the war; and so it came to pass: the globalists ..., um, sorry: the soldiers of the Soviet-Union, the English empire, the US empire, the Chinese empire and others (almost all of the whole world) won the 2nd World War.
The globalists, who are almost all from Germany, and the USA, whose inhabitants are also almost all from Germany, could not get out of celebrating from 1945 until the 1960s, when the defeat in the Vietnam War became more and more obvious (this is also the reason for the rise of the drug trade and the hippie movement ) - so much had the technology provided by Germans from Germany been enough for them: they could feel safe, because they had the technology stolen from the Germans, which no one could get to so quickly, and the patents stolen from the Germans, which also no one could get to so quickly. But when they later realized that the Vietnam War was lowering not only prestige but also prosperity and, more importantly for the globalists, profit margins for monetary transactions, accompanied by the growth of the first major problems with the dollar, which led to the removal of the gold backing on 15 August 1971 and to further insane measures, only then their globalist time began so rightly, because now they demanded ever more "liberalization of the markets" (with it they meant: more dictatorial powers for them) up to the hedge funds and all other disaster causes, which are however all only possible, if no more consideration for law and politics must be taken, but straight law and politics are completely delivered to the plutocratic globalists.
The globalists were not, are not and will never be about any other power than their own. They don't give a damn about the USA, and if they now "cooperate" with China (I remind you again of the demand of the globalists for more dictatorial powers for them, called "liberalization of the markets" [they still have a lot to do there in China!]), then only as long as they need China. European countries know this from their history. Before the USA became the main means, they were namely this main means. Now or relatively (historically relatively) soon it will probably become China.
Once again we should remember the example of the ancient Caesars and also that they lacked our technology: Caesar himself had the idea to move the capital from Rome to Alexandria or to Ilion. He knew that there was not much going on with Rome, that it was just completely decadent, completely effeminate. He was really very clever. But he did not give a damn about Rome in his objectives. If he said something else, it was rhetoric. He was very clever. And he knew how important money was in the realization of such goals he had. (If he had not conquered Gaul and the left Rhine part of Germania, he would have been lost.) And these, his goals, he took seriously. But only these, his goals. The rest was either indifferent to him or disturbing, and for the elimination of the disturbances he had his intelligence with consequent basic attitude and his people who lived from him, by his money and therefore by his power. Exactly this is also the aim of the globalists. Our globalists are global Caesarists. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
The power factor of money has always been underestimated. Caesar's power has also been underestimated at the beginning, and when the senators noticed it, it was too late: their years were numbered from now on. The power of the globalists is also always underestimated. Even their predecessors, who were not yet called globalists, were lucky enough to be underestimated. Napoleon, for example, did not know who he was actually fighting, as can also be heard in the following film (especially: 14:08 ff.):
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37198 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Globalism is Messianism. Instead of genocide through extermination it practices genocide through assimilation and appropriation - narcosis - infecting via the weakest point in what resists its dominance - like a virus, like a parasite.
Anglo Protestants are an example of it - cultural suicide. They became easy prey for parasitical dogmas - Abrahamism. There wasn't much to save after the Norse domination, so it wasn't much of a sacrifice to reject what was left of Anglo-Saxon culture. Similarly, dimwits and midwits that have nothing to say outside convectional beliefs feel free and unaffected by political correctness and censorship. There is nothing to repress when you echo conventional beliefs and values. Assimilation is worse when the superior is infected and corrupted by the inferior - when the superior dominates it is experienced as enlightenment by the inferior.
Holy Roman Imperialism can only go so far before it implodes.
In the end, people always want to return Home to their ethno-state and tribal identities: Familiarity.
The ideal of Multiculturalism and ethnic aliens living around you, Tolerating each-other, just doesn't last over time. It takes too much energy/money to sustain, for too little profit. Homogeneous societies are more energy-efficient. These trends match resource access and distribution, Abundance to Austerity. Abundance allows for Imperialism. Austerity leads to Socialism/Tribalism.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37198 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
The American Globalist agenda has now found a competitor. The 'melting pot' - miscegenation, culture-of-no-culture, tabula rasa individualism, identify founded on fashion trends and pop-cycled semiologies, is now confronted with an alternate model of multi-ethnic-nationalism where all ethnicities/races remain distinct and part of a cooperative unity.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Kultur
Gender : Posts : 234 Join date : 2021-02-14 Location : Faustian Land
The point is that the globalists know all these facts, e.g. those about races, peoples and the impossibility to bring them together in the long run in a nation like the USA, which is perhaps (!) a nation, but guaranteed not a race, not a folk, not an ethnicity. Because they have this knowledge, they use it strategically, e.g. in such a way that they use chaos and anarchy, through which they again gain a lot of money and thus power (arms deals, distraction from more important, but also more evil goals, etc.). They create chaos in order to become even more powerful through it.
They say their goals are "good" goals, and of course it is the other way around. They let masses demonstrate "for the climate" in order to take even more taxes and levies from the part of the population who work regularly. If they were really "for the climate", it would be much easier if they themselves distributed their money among the people. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.][You must be registered and logged in to see this image.][You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37198 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
The point is that the globalists know all these facts, e.g. those about races, peoples and the impossibility to bring them together in the long run in a nation like the USA, which is perhaps (!) a nation, but guaranteed not a race, not a folk, not an ethnicity. Because they have this knowledge, they use it strategically, e.g. in such a way that they use chaos and anarchy, through which they again gain a lot of money and thus power (arms deals, distraction from more important, but also more evil goals, etc.).
They say their goals are "good" goals, and of course it is the other way around. They let masses demonstrate "for the climate" in order to take even more taxes and levies from the part of the population who work regularly. If they were really "for the climate", it would be much easier if they themselves distributed their money among the people.
Some do....the majority have come to believe in their own lies, after generations of constant repetition. In my view this is what is occurring in the States - a conflict between the neo-con globalists elites; those that have come to believe in miscegenation and open borders, and that populations replaceability will produce peace and prosperity; those that now see how the US is being affected more than those this delusional ideology was supposed to target,: Americanism's enemies. those that resisted America's Globalist agenda - its dominion.
That small percentage of America's 'deep state' got Trump elected and is speaking through people like Tucker - otherwise Tucker would be gone in a blink of an eye. Miscegenation reduces racial potentials, decreasing median IQ and creativity, which affects America's competitiveness and its ability to dominate (because race is not a social construct). Nor is sex and gender a social construct, and transgenderism and abortions and homosexuality will have demographic consequences in the long-run....and they know it. Feminism destroyed the traditional family in the American dominated "western world", and this is beginning to have a demographic impact that cannot be compensated by opening the borders to populations from the south....since race is not a social construct. European and Asian populations are now unwilling to immigrate in sufficient numbers to deal with America's demographic issue and its generational dumbing-down through Hollywood, Media, and pop-culture. A qualitative problem, only the few can see looming in Aemerica's horizon. The US has been forced to practice what it preached for decades and this is beginning to have a detrimental effect.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37198 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
— esotericbot (@esotericbot) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Never, ever, see patterns nor try to explain them. This will expose you to their psychobabble silencing.
So inept they are in psychology that they need astrology, or idols offering them conventional insights into human nature, explaining to them those who reject Americanism, when adopting Americanism is what "well-adjusted" psychotics, like them, must do. Like I said elsewhere, they can easily offer their parroted insights into why individuals hate or become angered, but try to make them explain why love is not founded on the same insecurities and feebleness they ascribe to hatred.
Why did emotions evolve at all? Was it because of god, or was it because humans, like all life, are powerful and independent?
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Last edited by Satyr on Sat Feb 18, 2023 8:33 am; edited 1 time in total
Kultur
Gender : Posts : 234 Join date : 2021-02-14 Location : Faustian Land
The point is that the globalists know all these facts, e.g. those about races, peoples and the impossibility to bring them together in the long run in a nation like the USA, which is perhaps (!) a nation, but guaranteed not a race, not a folk, not an ethnicity. Because they have this knowledge, they use it strategically, e.g. in such a way that they use chaos and anarchy, through which they again gain a lot of money and thus power (arms deals, distraction from more important, but also more evil goals, etc.).
They say their goals are "good" goals, and of course it is the other way around. They let masses demonstrate "for the climate" in order to take even more taxes and levies from the part of the population who work regularly. If they were really "for the climate", it would be much easier if they themselves distributed their money among the people.
Some do....the majority have come to believe in their own lies, after generations of constant repetition
Yes. The lie often concerns you first. You have to lie to yourself first. But the lies themselves are offered, gradually, point by point, until the time has come when the lies have become dominant with self-deception, and this is indeed often the case after only a few generations (unfortunately!). This is what Spengler also said.
Satyr wrote:
That small percentage of America's 'deep state' got Trump elected and is speaking through people like Tucker - otherwise Tucker would be gone in a blink of an eye. Miscegenation reduces racial potentials, decreasing median IQ and creativity, which affects ... competitiveness and its ability to dominate (because race is not a social construct)
And that is one of the main goals of the globalists. They do not want power competitors. Therefore, they must reduce both economic/political power and intelligence.
Satyr wrote:
Nor is sex and gender a social construct, and transgenderism and abortions and homosexuality will have demographic consequences in the long-run....and they know it. Feminism destroyed the traditional family in the American dominated "western world", and this is beginning to have a demographic impact that cannot be compensated by opening the borders to populations from the south....since race is not a social construct.
This is also one of the main goals of the globalists: demographic changes, mixing, destruction, which also have the same background: no competitors, so that they can continue unhindered until they can be quite sure that no one is able to give them problems.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37198 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Globalism - Americanism - promoted from the moral justification of being divinely "chosen" or the "indispensable, exceptional nation" - manifest destiny - promises a alternative to paradise; an earthly paradise, utopia, located in a perpetually imminent future. Abrahamic superstition became futurism - last man = man with a superficial, "illusory presence" - appearance - and a promising future - salvation - but no past. The past was perpetually transcended, as man was born a tabula rasa and his identity was manufactured by man himself, once the Abrahamic one-god was deemed to be too divisive to the desired project (utopian ideal) of universal, global, uniformity, promoting a dualistic hierarchy of the priestly, moral authority class, and a herd of manimals - last men - lacking gender/sexual, racial/ethnic, cultural identity; a herd of clean slates that could be programmed by the priestly class, divinely sanctioned and validated, as such lacking will able to resist this "divine will" which these priestly moral authorities represented - having been chosen to act as divinity's mediators. All earthly authorities and identities were to be nullified, including anything that prevented the social engineering of this desired herd of malleable manimals.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Kultur
Gender : Posts : 234 Join date : 2021-02-14 Location : Faustian Land
NATO’s eastward expansion foments tension Putin’s Munich speech: "NATO expansion does not have any relation with the modernization of the Alliance itself, or with ensuring security in Europe. On the contrary, it represents a serious provocation that reduces the level of mutual trust."
Democracy by diktat won’t work Putin stressed in his Munch speech: "[The observance of human rights] is an important task. We support this. But this does not mean interfering in the internal affairs of other countries, and especially not imposing a regime that determines how these states should live and develop. It is obvious that such interference does not promote the development of democratic states at all. On the contrary, it makes them dependent and, as a consequence, politically and economically unstable."
An arms race will follow Putin stated in his historic Munich speech: "No one can feel that international law is like a stone wall that will protect them. Of course, such a policy stimulates an arms race… The potential danger of the destabilization of international relations is connected with obvious stagnation in the disarmament issue."
Unresolved Iranian nuclear problem Putin noted in his historic Munich speech: "If the international community does not find a reasonable solution for resolving this conflict of interests, the world will continue to suffer similar, destabilizing crises… We are going to constantly fight against the threat of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction."
Long-term contracts and energy security Putin stated in his Munich speech: "And now about whether our government cabinet is able to operate responsibly in resolving issues linked to energy deliveries and ensuring energy security. Of course, it can! Moreover, all that we have done and are doing is designed to achieve only one goal, namely to transfer our relations with consumers and countries that transport our energy to market-based, transparent principles and long-term contracts."
Unipolar world’s fall Putin said in his Munich speech: "I consider that the unipolar model is not only unacceptable but also impossible in today’s world. The model itself is flawed because at its basis there is and can be no moral foundations for modern civilization. There is no reason to doubt that the economic potential of the new centers of global economic growth will inevitably be converted into political influence and will strengthen multipolarity."
From friends to foes Putin said in his Munich speech: "He (U.S. President George W. Bush) says, 'I proceed from the fact that Russia and the USA will never be opponents and enemies again. I agree with him."
Another world Putin said in his Munich speech: "Russia is a country with a history that spans more than a thousand years and has practically always used the privilege to carry out an independent foreign policy."
NATO’s expansion, a unipolar world, disarmament problems, the erosion of the OSCE as an institution, the Iranian nuclear problem and Europe’s energy security - TASS has summarized Putin’s warnings and prophecies from his Munich speech that have come true simply because nobody turned an attentive ear to them.
Nevertheless, one should not approve of the developments in Russia, as there are already experiments with digital central bank money in Russia, for example.
In my opinion, all this is a sign that the global powers have big problems. As James Lindsay also said (see: Roundtable #9), they are already at odds with each other.
How did Maoism (especially its Cultural Revolution!) end?
If Mao had been honest and sane, would he not have had to admit at the end of his madness at the latest that all his policies were completely wrong (= left-wing)?
"[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]" (James Lindsay at the European Parliament, 2023).
And:
Satyr wrote:
Unlimited money for Ukraine, meanwhile this is Philadelphia[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
— Rev Laskaris (@REVMAXXING) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
The written text in the movie is cynical in a typically Americanistic way. Americanists do not even notice this cynicism. They are brainwashed with the brainwashing agent called Americanism.
It is simply not true that you can only be in solidarity with drug addicts if you only ever think positively about them. On the contrary: if you call them Zombies, the effect on them is often more positive in terms of improving their health than if you just pretend to think "highly" of them.
You may remember your school days. Which was more effective: the disregard due to cynicism or the punishment due to attention?
Drug addicts are less likely to kick their habit if they are met with hypocrisy, i.e. cynicism. They have to be confronted with reality. That works better.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37198 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
To tolerate all cultures is possible only if one does not have a culture. Perhaps the deepest or most influential root of modern Western multiculturalism is the Norman destruction of Anglo-Saxon Kultur. Norman civilization did play some role in replacing Anglo-Saxon Kultur with a more rationalistic mode of discourse. Western political equality’s slide towards cultural equality would thus have its most influential origin in the destruction of a distinct, native, Anglo-Saxon Kultur. The bourgeois Anglo-Saxon can believe that other cultures are equal to his own because his own Kultur is degenerate or dead. The mustard plants of multiculturalism have been fertilized by the decayed remains of individualistic universalism. Whereas the universalism of Christianity helped cultivate the idea of a single human race, multiculturalism is the admission of the failure of the practical realization of the ideal of a truly universal human civilization. Multiculturalism creeps back into a seemingly pagan tolerance, but is it pagan? Greco-Roman paganism tolerance was tolerance of diverse standards for diverse humans and this meant, in the view of men such as Aristotle, that some are born to be slaves while others are born to be masters. Tolerance for caste and other forms of inequality would be the ultimate logic of a pagan multiculturalism, and this point only clarifies the influence of Christianity in promoting the idea of a single, universal human morality in the West.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37198 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Americanism's culture-of-no-culture is the perfect model for Globalism. Underlying it is historical resentment.
********************************** What stands in the way of a New World Order - Globalism?
Ethnicity. Race. Gender. All biological identifiers. All cultures - traditions.
The goal is a culture-of-no-culture....populated by individuals with no past - Last Men; individuals with no collective identity rooted in nature. Associating all resistance with globalism is how they prevent resistance to become effective. The average dolt associates all alliances, all emerging unions attempting to resist, as being part of globalism.
Who are these "international capitalists"? They have names and faces. They are the ones funding open borders, free flow of resources - including human resources; they are the ones undermining traditional families, traditional cultures; they are the one imposing Americanism as a global model to be emulated by al
