Choosing a mate

Nature actually doesn't favor alpha, powerful male stuff.
That is the result of an evolutionist's opinions trying to make reality make sense without any kind of natural but higher intervention. Simply believing in evolution wont make you better than everyone else. Just like getting rid of christian sentiments does not suddenly make you any more reasonable.

"You" in this case means the general public.

Lady B is in demand around these parts.....impressive.

Guess I'm the exception.

Jarno wrote:

For example, I find this picture to be disgusting (I'm not exaggerating):
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Yeah, turn offish.

Lady A's gap between her thighs is very boyish, just like her figure overall.
I find that her looks are the beauty standard which is being promoted in popular culture - adolescence.
That an being obese (gives pity points to the social signaller who finds her beautiful anyway - 'social signalling'). Anything but healthy.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]


"By 2040 we estimate that 70 per cent of couples will get together online, with technology revolutionising the way we find love and build our relationships," said eHarmony UK country manager, Romain Bertrand. ''

Their progressive continuation does not know an ending, by 2040 we are shitting on the streets made by mystical creatures of not that long ago..
Fucking Anglo-Saxon degenerate miscegenating scum


''Biologically, humans are programmed to find people attractive who would be a good genetic match in order to produce the strongest possible offspring, meaning that by studying DNA we may be able to unlock the rules of attraction.''

Unlock the rules of attraction; Solution: Polygamy and exclusion of majority of males from the genepool. tadam.

G+ wrote:

Now girls will be able to select even more selectively, right down to the thickness and number of arm hairs. This means that no matter how you dress, behave, how otherwise fit you might be as a mate, a provider, a lover, a companion, you are probably already deemed a LOSER. See? There are no limits to the application of science to a perverse CARICATURE of eugenics in an age of hypergamy. Oh well, onward and upward, its a Brave New World.

And still we'll hear the refrain of "why are there so many shy-guys and marginal types.

''Rather than having to articulate what you are looking for in a partner, matching could become even more accurate through tracking people’s behaviour and how they react to different situations.

Physically, devices could track your actions and find other singles that have a similar lifestyle pattern, tracking data such as the places you go and the activities you do.''

Similar life style patterns? Going to clubs, getting screwed, screw someone, watch tv, or be a ass-fingering impotent porn addict.

What do they know about passion of attraction, instinctual; stupid cucks and sluts.