Know Thyself
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalSearchRegisterLog in

Share
 

 Who is Satyr?

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
AuthorMessage
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptySun Nov 13, 2011 11:53 pm

d63tark wrote:
First of all, I didn't accuse you of anything. I simply pointed out what was right in front my nose, dipshit.

And you will actually need to point out how I'm being hypocritical rather than just telling me I am.

Nor do I recall at any point in this discourse that deadbeats should get a free lunch. Even though I'm a little reluctant to sit by and watch them starve to death -that is since, despite my best efforts, I could easily end up in their situation as well.

The last question makes absolutely no sense to me.

Like most republicans, you remind me of a teenager who has just got busted for something or an Austin Powers movie:

You turn to the scattershot approach of mindlessly throwing everything on the table hoping that something will hit.

You wrote "First of all, I didn't accuse you of anything."
You wrote "I think you're basing your argument on a lot of cliches."
You wrote "try to work past your own personal perspective"

Cliche - A phrase or opinion that is overused and betrays a lack of original thought.

Well if you're telling me I should look past my personal thoughts, how can I be using
cliches which are unoriginal thoughts? My personal thoughts are my original thoughts.

Now, what don't you understand about my question "How is one fit for slavery when practicing altruism?"
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 14, 2011 12:10 am

mindern wrote:
d63tark wrote:
First of all, I didn't accuse you of anything. I simply pointed out what was right in front my nose, dipshit.

And you will actually need to point out how I'm being hypocritical rather than just telling me I am.

Nor do I recall at any point in this discourse that deadbeats should get a free lunch. Even though I'm a little reluctant to sit by and watch them starve to death -that is since, despite my best efforts, I could easily end up in their situation as well.

The last question makes absolutely no sense to me.

Like most republicans, you remind me of a teenager who has just got busted for something or an Austin Powers movie:

You turn to the scattershot approach of mindlessly throwing everything on the table hoping that something will hit.

You wrote "First of all, I didn't accuse you of anything."
You wrote "I think you're basing your argument on a lot of cliches."
You wrote "try to work past your own personal perspective"

Cliche - A phrase or opinion that is overused and betrays a lack of original thought.

Well if you're telling me I should look past my personal thoughts, how can I be using
cliches which are unoriginal thoughts? My personal thoughts are my original thoughts.

Now, what don't you understand about my question "How is one fit for slavery when practicing altruism?"

Exactly. Like the notion that all progressives are out to strip the rich of all their assets and distribute BMWs in the ghettos. I fail to see how your description of the cliche has anything to do with what I wrote. By your definition of the cliche, I would have to create a whole different language in order to avoid it.

And once again, I don't understand the question.

The question I'm asking is: at what point does the stupid little dance you are engaging in stop, and the actual argument begin?

The thing you're not getting is that I don't have to convince you of anything. And you're certainly not convincing me of anything. It's ultimately about who bears witness to it. Now do you actually think anything you've done here will be that impressive to people who might other wise agree with you -much less anyone that doesn't?
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 14, 2011 12:26 am

I don't suppose, mindern, you've noticed how Satyr has backed out of this discourse even though he has an agenda similar to yours.

This is because, like me, he lacks a tolerance for banality and mediocrity.

Like me (even though our conclusions are quite different), he despises superficiality or a fixation on surface appearances accompanied by an apparent inability or unwillingness to penetrate them to the underlying structures.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 14, 2011 12:42 am

Almost every one of your replies to me was a claim that you don't understand. Even when
I point out your hypocrisy & stupidity, you still claim to not understand. Well then either
i'm poorly expressing myself, or you're an imbecile. I'm betting on the latter.

This isn't a popularity contest. I read the original premise of the original poster,
and I had a question on two separate points.

If you don't understand my question "How is one fit for slavery when practicing altruism?"
then we can't go further. This is the starting point. I asked you repeatedly, what don't you
understand about it?
Back to top Go down
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36826
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 14, 2011 9:15 am

The naturalistic fallacy is often used by liberals wishing to defend their positions which are founded on weakness and fear.

I would say that pedophilia is also "natural" and so is having sex with a horse.
The idea that what can be done is automatically given respectability, is equal to the idea that being born automatically means that you are divine and worthy of respect.

Men's actions are guided by principles and values.
Some are connected to a past, nature, whereas others try to detach themselves from a past, with dire consequences.
The all-inclusion of a whore that claims that all deserve its and that so as to avoid being excluded herself is one stance.
How we degrade loyalty and friendship and eros and agape when we comfort ourselves with the idea that all deserve them in equal measure. We choose the immediate pleasure of comfort and ease making us victims of reality in the long run.

Humans try to create order in the disordering by setting up limits, boundaries of conduct and judgment.
Liberals try to dismantle them but then impose their own...for example they disown the notions of race and sex as broad generalizations which do not take into account the details but then easily conform to the concept of a human race which is the broadest and simplest generalization of them all.

A footnote:
A beaver, like any other animal, affects its environment with its activities.
But not to an extent that all of the environmental conditions that made its activities possible are disowned and rejected and "corrected" with interventions.

Only man can do this. This makes man the only species able to exist within its own constructs...in a state of delusion or encroaching solipsism.
This is exactly why man falls into decadence suffers great social calamities which return him to his senses, resulting in the cycles of history.
The world does not give a shit about what men consider just and good...but what man considers just and good does determine man's effectiveness within the world.


So yes we weep when a gazelle is eaten alive by a pride of lions, but stepping in over and over again to save it only degenerates the herd forcing man to place these animals in zoos where he can enjoy them in pristine, idealistic, romantic settings void of any reality which exceeds man's capacity to cope with.
Relating to the victim is usually a sing of one's own self-assessment.

What of the lions?
Do not their ways, their energies, their tactics their activities make them noble and worthy of survival?


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36826
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 14, 2011 9:20 am

d63tark wrote:
I don't suppose, mindern, you've noticed how Satyr has backed out of this discourse even though he has an agenda similar to yours.

This is because, like me, he lacks a tolerance for banality and mediocrity.


Perhaps d63tark can respond without pussy-footing around mindern.

d63tark wrote:
Like me (even though our conclusions are quite different), he despises superficiality or a fixation on surface appearances accompanied by an apparent inability or unwillingness to penetrate them to the underlying structures.
A usual tactic of simplicity...to evoke the hypothetical hidden kingdoms of some mysterious underlying or overarching truth, which they can never define nor express nor justify.

In older time priests and kings used to claim a supernatural source for their authority so as to keep the meek and the weak subdued.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
apaosha
Daeva
apaosha

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 1837
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 37
Location : Ireland

Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 14, 2011 12:39 pm

d63tark wrote:
No, actually you are. You can call it whatever you want: slave morality, a morality of resentment, etc.. But ultimately power is where power is.

The point is that leveling stunts mankind. It doesn't matter that it's a will to power. Life is will to power. The method and the consequences of those methods - and more importantly the specific type that would use those methods and/or be attracted by them is the important point to note.

The distinction here is that of type. As well as a discriminating taste between types. Power in itself as a factor signifying, in your simplistic view, "justification" is not particularily relevant. How many people do you suppose recited your kind of bullshit knowing the idealistic sentiment it invoked and the amount of followers with a taste for such bullshit (as it reflected their own needs) that it would attract?

But I am taking you seriously. Forgive me for it.

If I am a pathetic little weakling, frightened by reality and my fellow man, of my weakness in the face of either, of either's ability to affect me beyond my control... is it not then reasonable that I should invent a morality, a system of thought, a political philosophy which excuses my deficiencies and exhalts as the highest of virtues other's efforts to compensate for them?

More specifically, if I believed certain promises I thought society made me, if I matured with a complacent sense of entitlement and found that when at length reality confronted me with it's uncaring indifference that none of expectations materialized.... would I not envy those who could do what I could not?
Wouldn't I tell them that I had, simply because I exist, certain rights and privileges which it is, peculiarly, their obligation to meet?

Or, if I saw myself thus shamed by their example, would I not then mock and ridicule their success and by doing so hope to reduce it, so that when I stand in their shadow I would not be so small?

And when I have convinced them of the nobility of my smallness and the virtue inherent within pity for all smallness, that all slaves should be spared the tyranny of their masters, I can wrap the chains around their necks instead; the world overturned, the perfect revenge of a slave.

The imperative: know thyself. You do not.

Quote :
And seems strange for you to accuse me of being a delirious man child given the string of platitudes and cliches you used to support your argument.

Many things must seem strange to you. Me least of all.

What I find strange is that you address none of these "platitudes and cliches".

Just - dismissed. Fine argument.

You are an imbecile, aren't you? A drunk middle-aged wreck. With his rectum firmly impaled upon goat cock.

Quote :
And yes there is something worse than the tyranny of a slave: the tyranny of a master.

Either applied to me I would not enjoy. The slave however is easily the worse, given the amount of protection and artificial intervention his rule requires.
One can see it manifesting in socialism, in affirmative action, rights laws, in fact in the entire principle behind the democratic model.

Quote :
Are you a complete fucking moron or what?

king
Back to top Go down
https://knowthyself.forumotion.net
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 14, 2011 9:23 pm

First of all, apaosha, Mindern, I apologize for referring to you as morons. I have good friends who say pretty much the same things you do, and I don't even think of them as such, much less call them that. It's a knee-jerk response and I apologize for it.

However, you have to keep in mind that with people I actually know, I always know they are more than their ideologies because I know them as a whole person. However, here we are what we say. But I should be a little more responsible and assume that it is no different with you than it is with my friends, that you are, ultimately, more than you show yourself to be to me here.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 14, 2011 9:32 pm

Satyr wrote:
d63tark wrote:
I don't suppose, mindern, you've noticed how Satyr has backed out of this discourse even though he has an agenda similar to yours.

This is because, like me, he lacks a tolerance for banality and mediocrity.


Perhaps d63tark can respond without pussy-footing around mindern.

d63tark wrote:
Like me (even though our conclusions are quite different), he despises superficiality or a fixation on surface appearances accompanied by an apparent inability or unwillingness to penetrate them to the underlying structures.
A usual tactic of simplicity...to evoke the hypothetical hidden kingdoms of some mysterious underlying or overarching truth, which they can never define nor express nor justify.

In older time priests and kings used to claim a supernatural source for their authority so as to keep the meek and the weak subdued.

Now you know better than to think I have ever pussyfooted around you. Why would I pussyfoot around Mindern?

And this seems a little hypocritical given the underlying structures of evolutionary psychology you tend to refer to. Do you really think these things are right on the surface? And if they were, do you really think we would need you to describe them for us?

And I would think, given the fact that I'm never quite sure if you want respect or disciples, that the last sentence applies more to you.

Now come on, Satyr! I've got a little more faith in you than that. At least back me on that.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 14, 2011 10:29 pm

apaosha wrote:
The point is that leveling stunts mankind. It doesn't matter that it's a will to power. Life is will to power. The method and the consequences of those methods - and more importantly the specific type that would use those methods and/or be attracted by them is the important point to note.

Use to be it was rehashed Smith. Now it’s just rehashed Nietzsche and Rand.

And who said anything about a egalitarian society? No one’s out to strip the rich of all their assets and distribute BMWs in the ghettos. I’m sorry, but it’s just utter nonsense –little more than a heuristic narrative you’ve created to justify your own self interest.

Simply declaring that life is little more than Will to Power is a rather narrow description to say the least. You’re acting as if your particular metaphysic should be any more successful than any other metaphysic that has been offered throughout our cultural history.

And since you’ve chosen to engage in the circumstantial ad hominem of making inferences about those who might be attracted to those methods, or have basically turned to a slightly more sophisticated way of passing it off as “whining”, you must first know that I am doing just fine –better than most as a matter of fact. Furthermore, it would seem of equal importance to look at the “specific type” that might be attracted to your way of thinking: either someone who is doing well already, or someone who has been watching way too many Stallone and Swarzhenhager movies and thinks they are capable of doing well.

apaosha wrote:
The distinction here is that of type. As well as a discriminating taste between types. Power in itself as a factor signifying, in your simplistic view, "justification" is not particularily relevant. How many people do you suppose recited your kind of bullshit knowing the idealistic sentiment it invoked and the amount of followers with a taste for such bullshit (as it reflected their own needs) that it would attract?

Really? And the crap we hear on Fox News is that different? We have to remember here that the very cornerstone of conservative and Libertarian ideology is self-interest –and a very a-rational one at that. We are talking about one that will piss away the future of humanity by pumping more and more toxins into our environment in order to sustain a healthy economy, one that has this totally irrational notion that our natural resources are somehow infinite: drill, baby drill. We are dealing with an economic system that depends on a constantly growing population for a growing producer and consumer base at a time when we are reaching a population level that will be unsustainable. As Zizek points out, Capitalism is an economic system that must always borrow against the future and shows no hope of paying it back.

In other words, what we have in Capitalism is the utter irrationality of a common junkie that, rather than try to change their situation, would rather throw up their hands and plunge into the downward spiral.

I mean look at your self. You would rather bend over and let the powers that be stick it to you, without so much as the decency of a reach around, than actually face the beast. I get that. You're afraid and would rather take the easy way out. But you’re a house slave, man! I know that’s hard for to you get. You’re it’s bitch by virtue of your decision to play lip service to it.

And you guys refer to the liberals and progressives as the ones with a lack of courage.

apaosha wrote:
If I am a pathetic little weakling, frightened by reality and my fellow man, of my weakness in the face of either, of either's ability to affect me beyond my control... is it not then reasonable that I should invent a morality, a system of thought, a political philosophy which excuses my deficiencies and exhalts as the highest of virtues other's efforts to compensate for them?

More specifically, if I believed certain promises I thought society made me, if I matured with a complacent sense of entitlement and found that when at length reality confronted me with it's uncaring indifference that none of expectations materialized.... would I not envy those who could do what I could not?
Wouldn't I tell them that I had, simply because I exist, certain rights and privileges which it is, peculiarly, their obligation to meet?

And who exactly is this suppose to be describing?

Try rather, I am blessed with an articulate and creative mind that most people don’t get the blessing of having. I could use this blessing to increase my own wealth and happiness, should I choose to focus it in the right places. But what I find honors this blessing, in a way that it warrants, is to use it in a truly heroic way rather than a selfish and petty one, to pose it against real power rather than imagined offenses, to use it to justify and beautify life rather than demean it, and to make life an end rather than a means.

That said, I’d rather be THOUGHT of as a pussy, than actually be little more than a pussy that happens to tighten their fist every once in a while. You guys think you’re capable living in the dog eat dog world you propose. But if I were you, I would start preparing by not pissing away your time on here. Because, believe me, when your world comes to fruition, and I’m afraid it will, you won’t have time or resources for this anyway.




Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 14, 2011 10:48 pm

The Tea party attempts to associate itself with the founding fathers. The problem is that our founding fathers went up against a power structure that could kill them. The Tea Party, on the other hand, plays lip service to the present Empire by protecting them from paying more taxes.

Ultimately, the real function of the Tea Party is the equivalent of me going up to my boss and saying:

You know what? I've put up with it long enough. And I will not rest until your salary is doubled.

Dance around it all you want, guys. Articulate all you want. But a kiss ass is a kiss ass anyway you look at it.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 14, 2011 11:21 pm

You ever notice how Satyr tends to never stay in one place, then acts as if his elusiveness is validation of his superiority to us?

He reminds me of a line out of Thus Spake Zarathustra about poets:

They muddy their waters and think of themselves as having depth.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 14, 2011 11:25 pm

I mean think about it:

no matter what you say about him, it will always be wrong.

That is, unless you're talking like a disciple.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 14, 2011 11:26 pm

Then he'll insult you just to establish his power over you.
Back to top Go down
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36826
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyTue Nov 15, 2011 8:41 am

Boy wrote:

And this seems a little hypocritical given the underlying structures of evolutionary psychology you tend to refer to. Do you really think these things are right on the surface?
That's why I mine for my insights.
The "hypocritical" now appears your new baby-diaper.
I bet it is comforting to shit in your pants and know that the diaper will hide some of the stench before mommy comes to clean you all up. then all the world must forget you took a dump in your pants.

I think any value judgment coming form a mind so void of critical thinking and detached reasoning should be taken lightly and with knowing tolerance.

I know you must know everything I do, and more....but it seems like whatever you do know has resulted in an emotional reaction, due to personal weakness and cowardice.
Intelligence is one thing, but if it is not accompanied by some courage and detachment, resulting in some objectivity, then it turns into another womanly screech for justice and fairness.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyTue Nov 15, 2011 4:52 pm

d63tark wrote:
Then he'll insult you just to establish his power over you.
Has Satyr power over you... or do you still feel not insulted enough?
Back to top Go down
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36826
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyTue Nov 15, 2011 5:02 pm

d63tark wrote:
Then he'll insult you just to establish his power over you.
Maybe a Liberal Jewish boy like you prefers to have the cheek turned when you assault or when you try to pull what is above you down to your level...to equalize it with your retardation, thinking that this leveling should be taken as a flattering gesture on your part, but I don't think I can accommodate you on this.
Do you think boy, that if as bum tells you you're a swell guy' and no different than he is that he is offering you something to be proud of?

You are dull and stupid and that is why ILovePhilosophy is the place for you.
But if you choose to hang around then please do so without expecting to be taken seriously after one of your drunken binges or when you sober up thinking that you've made a brilliant point or that you've "challenged me" forcing me to "grow".

You, boy, are an average Progressive, Liberal, nit-wit.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyWed Nov 16, 2011 7:54 am

d63tark wrote:
You ever notice how Satyr tends to never stay in one place, then acts as if his elusiveness is validation of his superiority to us?

He reminds me of a line out of Thus Spake Zarathustra about poets:

They muddy their waters and think of themselves as having depth.

But try be circumspect:
Mind confesses itself
In disclosing meaning;
And thus a man himself
Is gleaned in gleaning;
Limits errors reflect.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyFri Nov 18, 2011 6:40 pm

Reply to d63dark

From what I gather, Satyr is neither an ascetic, nor a hedonist.

He practices and preaches moderation, or, a low quantity of high quality food, drink, etc.

In addition, I think he prefers a western style family (1-3 children, well looked after) to an eastern style family (4+ children, poorly looked after), or to the mating gorilla mating habits of the Joker, or the mating habits of a bonobo (group sex/marriage) . For Satyr, moderation or quality over quantity is a more, fit (in the Darwinian sense), healthier lifestyle.

He does not puruse, nor advocate abundance, affluence, debauchery, and he does not pursue, nor advocate scarcity, austerity, poverity (except on occassion, to keep one's mind, body and soul fit, prepared, strong). Satyr avoids the feminine, absolute completion on the one hand, and the masculine, absolute negation on the other. He avoids absolutes, extremes. He is not interested in excessive fame, fortune, wealth and power, he sees this as an addiction, a form of dependency, and he sees living in squalor as a form of weakness. Satyr avoids death from decadence, and atrophy, as much as he avoids death from deprivation.

I would describe Satyr as a social darwinist, and an antisocial darwinist. Once again, his moderation, and quality over quanity principles can be applied to social relations. If we associate and identify with just anyone, what does that say about us? For Satyr, I think he prefers a small amount of highly selective friendships to a large amount of lowly selective friendships. He prefers to be around people who he can genuinely, intellectually and morally relate to. He probably forms very strong bonds with the people he does let into his, rather exclusive, small circle, a circle based on shared gender, genes, but perhaps more importantly on memes. I can't picture him as an internationalist, a globalist, or an egalitarian. I think his ideal state would be, a small, hierarchical one, of likeminded, and likebodied people inhabiting the inner circle, and those with alien, or inferior genes and memes inhabiting the outer circle.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyFri Nov 18, 2011 7:05 pm

In terms of metaphysics and epistemology, for Satyr, philosophy and science ought to deal with the phenomenal world of experience, rather than with the conjecture, imaginings and speculation of crackpots who hate the world, and who are unfit to survive in it. They would seek to abandon the world, like the Jesus or the Buddha, or seek to radically alter it. Satyr is not a transhumanist, for him, transhumanism is just as much a rejection of the world as Christianity or Buddhism, Satyr wants to preserve the human life and nature as is, but he recognizes human life, possessing intellect and lacking physicality, must occassionally alter itself and it's environment to an extent. He is a conservative first and foremost, but I think he recognizes the need for some alterations and enhancements.

He's an empiricst, a materialist (in the metaphysical sense), a reductionist, and a determinist (though, I think he believes the greater portion of the universe is a void, chaos, or an incomprehensible, imperceptible order, he belives the laws of chance suggest order would occasionally form out of nothingness, he doesn't believe God, teleology, or objective values, or that the universe has objective meaning, or purpose), who believes the universe is a relativistic, dynamic flux.

He's not an antiphilosopher, or antimetaphysician, he utilizes static abstractions, absolutes and categories to his advantage, but bases them on the world, they are nothing in and of themselves, for Satyr, existence is kinetic, not potential, existence is interactivity.

He does not believe the subject can exist apart from the object, when the object passes away, the subject passes away, subjects apart from objects, ghosts or spirits, cannot be percieved, at best, they are purely hypothetical. He is a monist.

Well, I think that about sums him up.
Back to top Go down
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36826
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyFri Nov 18, 2011 7:54 pm

Pretty much.
I also like the color blue, the darker kind, and black.
I really love Asian cuisine, particularly Thai, Japaneses and Cantonese.
I prefer red wines to white, and of those I like the dryer variations.
I'm a carbohydrate freak: rice, potatoes, pasta.
I would rather eat potatoes roasted well, than meat.
I love stir-fries.
I do have sweets but I can't say that I am fanatical about them. Chocolate leaves me indifferent....I like it but I can go for months without having it.. Sort of like sex.

I love female ass....I don't even have to touch it or fuck it....just looking at it suffices.
I prefer black hair to blonde.
I have no interest in cars. I like motorcycles. But the climate here does not allow it.
But in automobiles I prefer jeeps: rugged, all-purpose, strong. Something to get muddy and scratch-up without giving a shit.

I like small homes, rather than large impersonal houses.

I like cool sunny days...heat bothers me. I can't think in it.
Rain is fine, if it is not freezing. I can walk for hours in it, or watch it from my window.
I like forests, hiking up mountain slopes, to swimming and lying around on a sandy beach.
I love watching rivers flow or the ocean crash against rocks.

I don't like traveling, so much, but I like being there. The travel inhibits me from going places to be.
I like intimate get-togethers to large parties. One-on-one or a small select group of people I can eat and drink around a table with while discussing and joking and just hanging out, with no pretenses or motives.

I like music when it is sad and deep. I like singing, particular along with others who share in my melancholia and have found in a tune the rhythm or the lyrics that express their inner longing.

I despise braggarts, show-offs and liars who believe their own lies. Stupidity drives me nuts. It's worthless, a dead-end....there's no place to go with it except into silliness, sarcasm and boyish taunting.
I hate dependent people who cannot do anything without someone there or someone holding their hand.
I do not like being the center of attention although I often make myself one with my quips or interventions when some moron spills out a pile of vomit which insults my aesthetics.
I despise rudeness and there is nothing more rude and crude than stupidity.
It's innocent, or unaware, but this is no excuse.

Nothing more to say.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyFri Nov 18, 2011 11:06 pm

Interesting, so now we get a little the personal in addition to the philosophical.

When people share something about themselves, it often elicits others to do the same.

I like dark blue and black also, my favourite color is blurple (blue/purple).

I prefer Greek and Italian food.

Used to be into carbs, switched over to meat and veg for health reasons (better for my sinusitis).

I like beer.. but not so much anymore.

I like female feet, nothing better than burying my face in some soft soles.
I'm a little asexual, I too can go for long periods without sex, and I find this makes sex all the more satisfying when I do have it. I don't like most women, can't stand them, although recently a co worker of mine has changed my mind. There are exceptions to the rule.. unfortunately she has a boy friend.

I'm lazy, I only work as much as I have to, I keep my expenditures to a bare minimum. I live in a one bedroom basement suite. The only thing I put a lot of effort into, is my intellectual pursuits (philosophy, science, the occult, etc), philosophy being primary. My only goal is to be a great thinker and writer, not necessarily great in the eyes of others, but in my own eyes. Also, maybe be a cult leader of some kind, or a survivalist.

There's not really much to me, I can be defined more by absence of interests than presence of interests. I take pleasure in few activities. I used to enjoy video games, movies and music, but not so much anymore, I got bored of them.

I loathe our consumerist, hedonistic, materialistic, dandy socialite society, it makes me sick to my stomach, not because I envy it, I don't think, I am able, not willing, but because of how shallow, how superficial it is.. and how unhealthy it is, for the body and the mind.

I too like a small quantity of high quality things, I take my friendships seriously, I don't like large groups either, I eat well, I drink well.

I used to like playing chess, checkers, and cards, I used to gamble, but I can't really afford to anymore, it's stupid anyway.

I think I'd describe myself as a bit schizoid.

I am my own country, my own culture, either I will go it alone, or people will follow me, I refuse to be lead.
Back to top Go down
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36826
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptySun Nov 20, 2011 5:47 pm

Thanks for the insight.

I hope others contribute their own.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Nov 21, 2011 4:54 am

I also prefer darker colours, particularly the contrast of navy blue with dark green.

My favourite taste is tangy and sweet/sour. Vinegar, anything pickled, etc.
When I was a kid, I liked to suck on coins.

Otherwise, I like pastry. Quiche is great.

Mostly, I drink beer and whisky. Recently I've been trying out some red wine and liking it more than I used to.
I prefer darker/sweeter beers.

I've got a thing for redheads.
And I like the upper-thigh. The hip area in general, really.
Like the movement. A nice way of walking or sitting.
And the crease that forms along the top of the inner-thigh.

I'm lazy too, and I procrastinate like nobody's business.

I can be fairly unreliable and frivolous.

I hate people who assume an opinion because of its social utility, or because it's the "smart person" opinion, and not because of conviction. That's the reason for my name: when I felt that someone was treating opinions as fashion accessories, my immediate reaction was to take up sides with the opposition. Many moons ago, I "argued" for creationism against evolution solely out of spite.

I tend more towards paranoia and obsessive-compulsiveness. I had a schizophrenic aunt to boot.
Back to top Go down
Guest
Guest



Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyWed Nov 30, 2011 7:47 pm

Oh, you all got to know each other while I was away. How quaint.
Back to top Go down
Hrodeberto

Hrodeberto

Gender : Male Capricorn Posts : 1318
Join date : 2014-07-14
Age : 37
Location : Spaces

Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 14, 2014 7:27 pm

Satyr wrote:
Excellent.

The last part is a bit of an oversimplification.
i see value in blood and bloodlines and blood ties, but I also recognize that certain qualities appear within all heritages.
I wish to unite them under one banner with a clear motive and a clear division of loyalties.

Nationalism is a earthly quality, of the mother earth. I wish to be supranational.
Genes give birth to memes and so memes can be adopted, they can impregnate alien cultures and turn them into an honorary genetic bloodline.

The ancient Greeks separated men into Hellenes and Barbarians.
To be Greek, although tied to the geography and the family trees, was also accessible via paidiea: education.  
One who thinks Greek, and speaks Greek and adheres the Greek attitude, is Greek...he would does not, and this includes modern day Greeks, or so called Greeks, is a Barbarian.  

Nietzsche, Evola, were quintessentially Greek. The former went so far as to openly show his admiration and preference.
Do not forget who his biggest influence was: Heraclitus.  

Hm, that is the connote/prefix, "supra," which I formulated/fabricated into the ontogenetics of my own bio-spiritual epistemological impetus: e.g., Supranationalist and Supra-Aryanist.
When offering the notion of my world conception I yield it as, Empirical-Idealism: Supranationalism, or Aryanist-Supranationalism.

Have only heard "supra" twice elsewhere -- namely, from Rudolf Steiner, where I first starting conceiving of the idea, and some guy on the internet -- and make that three herein.

_________________
Life has a twisted sense of humour, doesn't it. . . .

*  *  *
Back to top Go down
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36826
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 14, 2014 7:43 pm

I use it to differentiate from super-natural, usually associated with what is above - usually implying a disconnect, or an alternate, as in 'supernatural' as opposed to 'natural' - and supra as that which emerges from within, and is not other than what it emerges from.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Hrodeberto

Hrodeberto

Gender : Male Capricorn Posts : 1318
Join date : 2014-07-14
Age : 37
Location : Spaces

Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 14, 2014 8:02 pm

Satyr wrote:
Excellent.

The last part is a bit of an oversimplification.
i see value in blood and bloodlines and blood ties, but I also recognize that certain qualities appear within all heritages.
I wish to unite them under one banner with a clear motive and a clear division of loyalties.

Nationalism is a earthly quality, of the mother earth. I wish to be supranational.
Genes give birth to memes and so memes can be adopted, they can impregnate alien cultures and turn them into an honorary genetic bloodline.

The ancient Greeks separated men into Hellenes and Barbarians.
To be Greek, although tied to the geography and the family trees, was also accessible via paidiea: education.  
One who thinks Greek, and speaks Greek and adheres the Greek attitude, is Greek...he would does not, and this includes modern day Greeks, or so called Greeks, is a Barbarian.  

Nietzsche, Evola, were quintessentially Greek. The former went so far as to openly show his admiration and preference.
Do not forget who his biggest influence was: Heraclitus.  

Ontogenetics is contextual and as such genes do not determine or beget anything as they are but vehicles (of the spirit and personality/biography), just as the brain is the organ/vehicle of the mind.

_________________
Life has a twisted sense of humour, doesn't it. . . .

*  *  *
Back to top Go down
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36826
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 14, 2014 8:09 pm

Genes pass-on potentials - experiences/knowledge/data.
Genes evolve within environments, and within these environments they are encoded.
Each meme emerging within a particular population is rooted in the past, where the genes emerged, and they carry this memory in the code (language).

I wish to re-affirm in a culture that denies the relevance of genes and in how they manifest; I reaffirm the continuance.
I'm a (re)attacher of concepts to the world - the noumennon to the phenomenon; the word to the act.

I do not invent this stuff, I re-call it, for all those deaf, dumb and blind ones, hoping one of them might go further.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Hrodeberto

Hrodeberto

Gender : Male Capricorn Posts : 1318
Join date : 2014-07-14
Age : 37
Location : Spaces

Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 EmptyMon Jul 14, 2014 8:47 pm

Satyr wrote:
Genes pass-on potentials - experiences/knowledge/data.
Genes evolve within environments, and within these environments they are encoded.
Each meme emerging within a particular population is rooted in the past, where the genes emerged, and they carry this memory in the code (language).

I wish to re-affirm in a culture that denies the relevance of genes and in how they manifest; I reaffirm the continuance.
I'm a (re)attacher of concepts to the world - the noumennon to the phenomenon; the word to the act.

I do not invent this stuff, I re-call it, for all those deaf, dumb and blind ones, hoping one of them might go further.

Heredity is very real, but I should like to establish that a culture which treats genes (the world of phenomena) as the radix instead of as the manifestation, expression or form of the underlying ideal/idea/archetype/driving force/creative principle is self-complacent in delusion or modern maya or illusion.

_________________
Life has a twisted sense of humour, doesn't it. . . .

*  *  *
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Who is Satyr? Who is Satyr? - Page 2 Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Who is Satyr?
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 2 of 3Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Similar topics
-
» Satyr
» Satyr
» Satyr in Short
» Greetings and Question for Satyr
» My Rev-i of satyr's philosophies

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: