Quotes, Excerpts, Anecdotes.

Buddha wrote:

Forgive others, not because they deserve forgiveness, but because you deserve peace.

Nassim Haramein wrote:

Looking for consciousness in the brain is like looking in the radio for the announcer.

Karl Pribraim wrote:

Looking for consciousness inside the brain is like digging to the center of the Earth in search of gravity.

Satyr wrote:

You can find any quote on any subject.
Looking for consciousness outside the brain, is like looking for yourself outside your body.
Gravity is about the movement of the earth...not a place.
So is consciousness.
It is the brain's movements.

If the earth stops rotating...gravity stops.
When the brain stops moving, acting, consciousness stops.

Grow, the fuck, up.
Ger over your need for superstition.

Satyr wrote:

Because 0.1% probability is nonsense and not worth wasting time on - infantile games of "what if"?

The objective is to approach 100%....but this requires that we do not waste our time and energies on crap.

Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote:

He who would gather immortal palms must not be hindered by the name of goodness, but must explore if it be goodness. Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind. Absolve you to yourself, and you shall have the suffrage of the world. I remember an answer which when i was young, i was prompted to make to a valued advisor who was wont to importune me with the dear old doctrines of the church. On my saying, "What have i to do with the sacredness of traditions, if i live wholly from within?" my friend suggested, "But these impulses may be from below, not from above." I replied, "They do not seem to me to be such; but if i am the Devil's child, i will live then from the Devil." No law can be sacred to me but that of my nature.

Jarno wrote:

I've been for some time been very critical of current "far-right" voices and especially with the gym culture and such where young people feel invincible and LARP as chads online and try to one-up each other on radicalism without ever even testing if they are even worth anything, video is not completely related though I feel like it's part of the same phenomena, but it's good example about people's fantasies, that they never get to actually dare to face/challenge people and face the truth about themselves, there is no overcoming just delusion

Lots of people in the replies and quotes are trying to play the Hitler card on this but Hitler explicitly called language purism dumb and explicitly acted against the Allgemeine Deutsche Sprachverein [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Chairman (@LRH_Superfan) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

apaosha wrote:

Maybe it's time to get off social media.

apaosha wrote:

I like Varg because he appears to be absolutely sincere and instead of endlessly complaining about what is wrong with the world and what people should or shouldn't be doing he instead becomes the change he wants to see in the world. This kind of sincerity comes across as cringy to the rest of them, especially the american kind, because they are so deep in following popular trends on social media, chasing audiences and clout that sincerity simply marks one as a chump, a target, or a lolcow.

apaosha wrote:

That individuals even attention-seek in this dangerous manner suggests a kind of psychotic exhibitionism. Look at me! no matter the cost.
But you are getting invested in sides between squabbling e-celebs. Are you on team Psychotic Exhibitionist A or team Psychotic Exhibitionist B?
None of this matters.

...
I don't know much about Thomas777. Isn't he a homeless childless american white nationalist? I've never heard him do anything interesting. You shouldn't discount christianity as his underlying motivation. Christian white nationalists are the worst of the bunch.

apaosha wrote:

This is the problem really. It becomes a matter of personalities and reputations and fanbases. It's why social media is cancer and you should disentangle yourself from it if you can.

apaosha wrote:

From what I understand of Varg's theories is that he thinks Europeans are descended from Neanderthals, who he describes as being blonde/blue-eyed/etc, a pure race. That anyone who might be 'white' but is not of Nordic phenotype is 'mixed' to some degree.
His evidence is mainly that blonde/blue-eyed is recessive and so if it spontaneously emerged within a population of black-haired/brown-eyed people that it would not get a chance to spread in the short timelines that scientists put this all in. I think this is a fair point and shouldn't just be dismissed, his egoism aside....