Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalFAQMemberlistSearchRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism.

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2
AuthorMessage
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:02 pm

Quote :
Nazi pilot to be removed from women in aviation ceremony

Women of Aviation Worldwide Week initially stood by its decision to honour Reitsch despite criticism, with Marguerite Varin saying: “She's the first. I can’t change history. I can’t change the facts. I will not invent an alternative fact. She’s the first woman to have flown a helicopter, and we are this year having the theme on helicopters.”

The group conceded to public pressure.

B’nai Brith Chief Executive Officer Michael Mostyn said regardless, he is dissatisfied with the organizers’ response.

“It is unfortunate that they are not taking the opportunity to produce a learning moment by educating the young women who will be in attendance against the evils of the Nazis,” he said.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Mon May 01, 2017 7:56 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Quote :
Study: Describing Breastfeeding as ‘Natural’ Is Unethical Because It Reinforces Gender Roles
Using the term ‘natural’ is ‘ethically inappropriate’ because it suggests women are babies’ primary caretakers.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Tue May 16, 2017 2:05 am


"Homosexuality is something they choose to express and is an identity."
"Homosexuals cannot choose not to be gay."
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14993
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Tue May 16, 2017 7:22 am

Infantile minds creating infantile propaganda aimed at infants.
A retarded relationship of retards.

Seeing them try to 'normalize' pedophilia will be entertaining.
I bet they'll start from the more "acceptable" older woman, prepubescent extremely lucky boy.
Pedophilia is more appetizing when it's a young male being "exploited'.

Bill Nye experienced a "change".

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14993
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Tue May 16, 2017 12:46 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sun Jul 09, 2017 8:18 am

The liberal holds two incompatible ideologies: It says that 'benefiting the individual (rights) benefits the whole' and 'when it benefits the whole, individual (rights) should be foregone'.

The individualism of liberalism makes inequality necessary and expected. The question becomes not whether inequality should exist, but whether that inequality is deserved/earned.

Of course, those who support this judgment of others' deserve/earn within a civilized context are jealous of those children whoms parents care enough to provide them with opportunities that those have-nots cannot have. This is how liberalism actually says love and kindness is a bad thing.

But, they think it's smart and 'humble' to provoke the resentment of everything that's made their little bubble of entitlement possible... So be it.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Mon Jul 17, 2017 8:52 pm

Indifference for me, not for thee.

If you're indifferent about what is uncomfortable for me to fathom, then you are a sick individual or evil. Or genetically inferior (as I love to use absolutist genetically determined words to describe my ideological "rivals" and then speak about how I'm against such language and the context surrounding it, laughing in their face and retreating into the asylum when I'm called on this).

I'm allowed to be indifferent about boring and old things, like survival, chores, politics, tribe and tradition... but sex? That's new and exciting. So is eating.

You're either with me or against me. Indifference about what I care about, is against me - and if it's against me, it can only be evil, for I am good... are you suggesting I'm not good? I care about me a lot. You can't be indifferent. So you're saying I'm evil. Saying I'm evil, is against me.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sat Jul 29, 2017 7:21 pm

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Fri Aug 04, 2017 11:11 pm


First minute, 0:00-1:00 about her being "white" because most people refer to her as "white".

Most people call 'chicks with dicks' 'guys with boobs'. Therefor, trans people can't be oppressed. Or do they not want to be called/referred to as something that makes them more 'privileged'? They literally want to be LESS privileged? And you do too? Astounding.

Reminds me of the BuzzFeels video where some fat red cheeked white skinned 'hispanic' wanted people to stop calling him white.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sat Aug 05, 2017 10:34 pm

"Take your hands off and stop controlling God's property - me."
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Wed Aug 16, 2017 4:56 am

What can you do with a virus that attacks you and then, when your immune system tries to stop it, it says "lol triggered"? The only solution offered is their death or yours.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Fri Aug 18, 2017 5:08 am

Every atrocity that goes unseen and ignored, every atrocity they turned their eyes blind to, is another reason for them to keep believing everything is okay.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:59 am

If it's anti-Semitic for a Jew to call a person 'goy', then it's anti-white for a white person to call someone nigger. Luckily, I'm a good SJW and I hate white people, like George Ciccariello Maher. So when I'm calling people anti-white, I really mean they're pro-white. And it's true, because they don't call niggers, niggers. If they would just start calling niggers niggers and kikes kikes, then they could be pro-white again - which is anti-white. Source: New York Times, etc. "'Goy, Bye' is anti-Semitic"
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Kvasir

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 814
Join date : 2013-01-09
Age : 32
Location : Gleichgewicht

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:55 pm



This is where this douchbag Molyneux, lets his true colors shine. This is what he is about: positive image. He is building a legacy of one of the greatest pseudo-intellectuals who ever lived. Giving the negro a platform to express its simplistic ideas and tedious sentimentalism and primitive superstitions is strategic. It’s no different than the classic marketing tactic of the White politician to snap a picture of himself, smiling next to some civil rights nigger activist.

The discussion is a joke. No serious thinking. It’s all about them stroking each other off on infantile platitudes of human unity. Molynuex humors him for the sake of his audience who are utterly clueless idiots and are blind as to who their internet idol Molynuex really is underneath all his pedantic erudite verbosity that charms them like a schoolgirl in the presence of her crush.

Sometimes, a man doesn’t have to be smart to fuck a woman. All he needs is an intuitive knack for saying the right things at the right times and she swoons. Molynuex is an academic PUA to average minds who like clever articulation and wittiness. The only challenge he presents is if you are wise enough to sift through his bullshit and see the pretentious sycophant that he is.

Their juvenile discussion centers around the agreeableness angle where no inherent discourse objective is reached. It’s not about race, it’s just about the idea of America that must be given faith. The idea of being “American”, that magic word that erases all of one’s past and ethnicity and mutates it into an amorphous ideal of being an ‘individual’.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14993
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sun Aug 20, 2017 1:16 pm

Molyneux is a another hypocrite selling philosophy and ideology on the [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]...in the world market, AGORA.

His criteria for what is 'good' is the same as with many Nihilists:
What sells.
What is popular.
What satisfies the needs of the many - majority.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Wed Aug 23, 2017 6:18 pm

The contradiction of multiethnic states is that, despite their supposed non discrimination, they still perform wars they believe to be in the interests of their multiethnic citizenry. Except there is no criteria for that citizenry but humanity itself. This means when they go to war against the interest of their population, they are going to war against the interests of humanity itself. And it cannot be said their opponents are inhuman, no matter how lecherous they may appear. When their standard for love is humanity, any war or fight against alien populations which result in the death of "innocents" is liken to killing ones own family/citizens. In that same instance, they have performed a war against humanity.

Every humanist and anti-nationalist politician is performing an act of individual terror when they do this - an atomic and greedy outburst against all of humanity, the very thing they purport to support. It is a greed and hyperindividualism of hedonism which makes them do this.

Every crime committed likewise becomes one against humanity, so long as there exist significant differences between ethnic humans that go ignored, as a level between species and individual. One must define the species by sex a reproduction. Of course it's no coincidence these same people say there exist only one "race", the "human race", to show their anti-speciesism in an indirect way.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Wed Aug 30, 2017 3:13 am

Social justice "anti-hatred" is self-righteousness in that the expression of one's own hatred is taken as exclusively from the fruits of one's own love and attempts at protection, and the hate (originating from the other) is not. There are a couple of assertions which attempt to reconcile this, so as not to appear contradictory:

1) Appeal to universal morality. This is the idea that there exists a objective perspective for the most moral position. From here, one is allowed to say they are more moral than the other. Or, one has a higher moral claim to valid love/hatred than the other in some regard. One attempt at criteria might be appeals to utilitarianism, capitalism or liberalism. Some might say that one should only hold principles at any one time that maximize the happiness of everyone. Another could say you should hold a principle of reducing conflict at any cost, if capable (tolerance doctrine). This doctrine of tolerance can take on many different forms, such as valuing human life above dignity (endure torture if it means you risk killing the torturer if you respond, etc.)
2) Appeal to universal morality, community edition. One here takes claim that the other individual is loving but not to some communal standard, meaning they are too greedy or have localized their love too narrowly. A weakness of this is that if the standard for 'love' is also too encompassing/free, then it dilutes its very meaning.
3) Appeal to truth, bad premises of the other. In this case, the person says that they have righteous, accurate, or more accurate premises for their hatred than the other. This, then, provides them justification for declaring the other either dangerous or stupid, but not necessarily immoral; unless they make the claim that ignorance is the same evil (a stark contrast to the idea that ignorance is actually innocence when it comes to accusations "I didn't know!"). If declared dangerous, it generally justifies (for them) either intimidation (paralyzing the other with fear so they do not act on bad information) or otherwise some sort of constraint or physical resistance. In some ways, this is an appeal to consequence.
4) Appeal to morality, fallacy edition. Some examples are appeals to 'common sense' (acting confounded or declaring 'preposterousness'), appeals to authority, etc.

When it comes to love, humans have a biological limitation. Claims for love abounding further than those biological limitations leave the individual open for exploitation. That is, the degree to which reputation cannot be independently and transparently examined, is the degree to which the individual opens themselves vulnerably. If there are state or institutions in place to protect that vulnerable behavior, then the costs are mitigated, to the degree that protection extends over the phenomenon which would effect them.
Individuals who do not want to take on those costs are then, usually, declared to be blasphemers or are otherwise forced/coerced to take on the costs. Some individuals may not trust the institution or body which proclaims to be providing adequate protection in exchange for the costs/risks. Some may have principled concerns or be, to some opinions, 'paranoid' - making them resistant to all paternal entities.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:02 am

If white: don't be proud of your racial heritage or ancestry, only individual achievements matter.
If black: black people built the USA!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sun Sep 10, 2017 6:23 pm

The most powerful force in the world is destruction, not love, despite what those supposed haters of hatred say. This is the case because in a hostile world where all order is subject to damage and chaotic erosion, it is easy to scapegoat the destruction they purposefully cause as a result of natural processes. So, the haters of hatred, the intolerant of intolerance and destroyers of destruction, still dishonestly utilize the language of hatred and destruction for their supposed 'anti-hatred'. When the irony isn't lost on them, they instead become self-righteous. This is despite the fact that self-righteousness is a behavior of conservation and defiance in the face of change - or what they like to call 'progress'. That irony, at the very least, appears lost on them, since they like to pretend they are victims or powerless against the 'evil' that their opponents represent. It is a demonstration that, if they are not utterly stupid, then they take their 'evil opponents' for fools or utilize the language in a purposefully malicious way. If they are not malicious, it's a curious wonder, then, how it is they are so brutalized by an idiotic opponent if they were not even more-so idiotic themselves.

When they are declaring that 'racism is trying to become legitimate' or 'validate itself' anyway it can, it's also a wonder how they can still claim that they are such 'victims of racism' when they talk as if racism were struggling to regain, instead of maintain, power. And, if they are operating on a system of reciprocity, where they are behaving malicious without any ill conscience to the fact (because they believe we are), then they are utilizing rhetoric only as some sort of retarded 'magical weapon' against their opponent at best (which, if admitted, would be an open declaration of hostilities) or expressing their condescending attitude towards the audience's agency (and intellectual ability) in making their own rational decisions or considerations, at worst.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sun Sep 10, 2017 7:12 pm

In all empirical interpretations of the idea of 'destruction of destruction itself', it is absurd and tautological. Historically this kind of language was reserved for hypothetical behaviors like the deityous powers of Shiva, who was given that precise ability of destroying destruction itself. Those claiming to support such behaviors rely on faith or, if believing they actually accomplish it, are claiming the ability for supernatural power and are likely delusional while also claiming for themselves the very idea of perfect goodness in what amounts to a narcissism or delusion of grandeur that is more pathological than even the most cartoonish representations of an 'evil' throughout history.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Impulso Oscuro

avatar

Gender : Male Aries Posts : 255
Join date : 2013-12-10
Age : 26
Location : Praxis

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:39 pm

Slaughtz wrote:
Those claiming to support such behaviors rely on faith or, if believing they actually accomplish it, are claiming the ability for supernatural power and are likely delusional while also claiming for themselves the very idea of perfect goodness in what amounts to a narcissism or delusion of grandeur that is more pathological than even the most cartoonish representations of an 'evil' throughout history.

Not only is it more pathological but i think such pathologies are the creators of such hyperbolic representations in the first place.

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Thu Sep 14, 2017 2:55 pm

The idea that one cannot be pro-white and not anti-black is equivalent to the conviction that one cannot be simultaneously pro-living not murderous of everyone else. It is only a special kind of psyche that is murderous of everyone and all life that would utilize such an argument at its basic structure - and then on the top of it deflect from their responsibility to their demonstrated pattern when called out on it. This, leaving fools and the spineless to not properly reciprocate in response to the psychopathy, in the same manner one would fire a rocket launcher at a sniper, no matter if there's many hooded women, children or other men purposefully standing in the way so you cannot retaliate and disarming you from any other means of doing so. There's plenty of space for them to move out of the way, and this logic being applied against those 'anti-semites', where they'll tear down every platform if it means hosting even one iota of a vitalizing ethos that wreaks destruction on suppressive parasites is justification enough for a reciprocal response. It is the parasite's hope you won't take it up on its gamble. It's typical of parasites to promote 'love' while condemning 'hateful antibodies'.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Kvasir

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 814
Join date : 2013-01-09
Age : 32
Location : Gleichgewicht

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:13 pm

The notion of “Free speech” has become the new mediator of modern political nihilism. It injects itself into every conflict that erupts between both political sides. The left use it as a Marcusean divined threat to be abolished and overcome to allow their Stalinist-communist agenda to progress. While on the right, we see it as their guiding principle of their own stunted psychological weakness to actualize the traditional tenets and values they promulgate and champion.

Those on the modern right have become a product of their evolution of liberal indoctrination and cling to the idea of “free speech” to express their passivity inherited from their inferior generation that they ardently distance themselves from but are actually kindred to. The preoccupation with using reason to overcome all threats no matter how dangerous they are, is the maladaptive trait they have cultivated. Their social engineering and conditioning from academia and sheltered reality through simulated forms of education, and the uncontrolled unassailable age of rationalism, has produced in them the delusion that now any problem can be solved by way of reason alone, without any other means of force or physical violence. That any threat can be met without anybody really getting hurt, and that the age old conflict resolution of ‘talking things over’ will solve any problem.

The modern rightists are not much different than the inept, inert, and indifferent establishment politicians and elite who regurgitate the same platitudes and talking points that lead to no real objective (maintenance of the status quo), but retention of their power. The right of Free Speech implies nothing more than a form of “agree to disagree” stagnate, slavish decrepitude reinforcing the strength of the ankle chains keeping them locked down in inadvertent submission. Where the events spiraling out of control can be regulated by the traits of intellectual feminization we see in their inability to see that reason has limits and cannot be the balm on every problem, the contrast to the degenerate animals on the left who think the idea of equality can be the balm on everything. Both sides have found their delusions. Both sides have their pacifiers they suckle on. Both are trapped in limbo that they constantly attempt to escape from through patterns of impulsive behavior, one side with physical outbursts because of mental inferiority and low IQ, and the other from intellectual social constraints and conventions that strap them down to obedience to their institutionalized master of social law.

Stephan Molynuex, everyone’s favorite witch doctor of rhetorical and verbal acrobatics and sophistry, came out with a new book promoting the “art of the argument” and how words and rationale can solve everything if we just close our eyes and believe with all out heart and practice self-deluding exercises of meditation and breathing techniques that take in the irrefutable points of logic and expel the rest of the bad stuff in reality, that doesn’t give a shit about human contrivances. Or the current trending vaudeville theater taking place in the NFL where physically grotesque multimillionaire niggers protest a flag representing nothing having to do with their imagined “oppression” but with the history of oppression that European man inflicted on himself, which the ones who cheer and jeer in opposition and protest in favor of this symbol of degeneracy are just as clueless and retarded as the niggers protesting something their animal brains can’t fathom.

But there are those who have genuine spirit. Those who merge with these movements with sensible purpose and who display knowledge of the truth that lies beneath the fog of delusion. Those who choose to use whatever tools buried in the mound of excrement that they can find to than construct some artifice of reason despite the absurdity and madness of that which stands against them. And it is those lone or small groups of souls that perhaps still make the seasons change.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1217
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 26
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:16 am

" 'Nazis' are SJWS "
There are two comment/threads I created to this accusation because I was tired of expecting someone else to speak up about it.
--

Slaughtz @Slaughtz Oct 2, 2017, 11:44:33 PM EDITED
An SJW is one who gets offended and challenges the other violently for it, all while saying that the other is the one committing violence and that they're only doing something in self-defense AND simultaneously telling you that you're crazy or that what they're doing is for your own good. The difference between an SJW and a 'Nazi' is in the last part: the SJW performs all that while the 'Nazi' says it's very obviously not for your own good as you're opposed to their own. You might ask how it is the SJW actually does that, and it's by their ideological proclamations that they're doing things for the 'good of everyone' or 'good of humanity' and that you're literally subhuman or nonhuman/monstrous for what you do. Meanwhile the 'Nazi' says he's human like you and part of humanity is the monstrosity and he's there to say you're no better than him and he knows just how monstrous and evil you can be - and now fight him. You will acquire no acquiescence of 'superiority' or compliments from the SJWs. They will not give you the satisfaction - and certainly the women of that kind should not, because it has been bred in patriarchy that to kill them is more inhumane. It is the orbiters and the ignorant ethnic others, controlled by a more subversive ethnic group which gives them the license for pathology, which makes them engage you with words that are totally disabling and monstrous in their speech, like 'racist', which demonizes the very act of self-interested behaviors and natural tribalisms. That which if acted upon consistently would destroy all desire for reproduction or otherwise maintenance of the species. They attack and shame you for the very things fundamental to everything you (and 99% of people) are and say: this is for everyone, this is for humanity, this is for you.

To possible objections: yes, 'Nazis' say that there are traitors and cucks, but they do not do this to the degree which SJWs do. That is, the scope of the 'Nazi' is their tribe and the scope of the SJW is the whole of humanity. Just on a principle of maximizing locality/local agency, one would have to concede 'Nazis' are preferable to SJWs - provided you do not think they are any more hateful than SJWs. The Holocaust is supposed to be the evidence which convinces you that they are. Somehow American children raised from the 90s and 80s are those 'Nazis' or will even have such a hatred without a justification that's more reasonable than sheer pathology, as Hitler is portrayed. To say that their scope excluding other tribes means they 'hate' other tribes would be incorrect. It is an indifference. If you will not countenance indifference as a position in life, then you are the radical and extremist. And they are indifferent until they are threatened within the framework they have set up. No 'Nazi' has invaded far off corners of the world because they thought there resided a threat with indigenous populations. Even some still persist today despite the Anglo-Semitic empire that sought to fulfill their White Man's Burden.

---
-OP says 'right-wing SJWs' censor lewdness-

Slaughtz @Slaughtz Sep 30, 2017, 1:07:33 PM
Banning children from consuming porn is different. If you're going to consume porn, it should be looked down upon culturally and as something only a minority do - of which we don't ban the consumption of because we are faced with either driving it underground or stricter punishments. It is not an argument that practically people 'come out fine' from a childhood filled with this or otherwise. The interest is not in creating 'fine' people, but the best people we can of which the majority are capable. Also, calling nazis and tradcons a bunch of SJWs is like calling the banker Jews your immortal god and probably expressing your advocacy for the killing off of the white race, as well. That makes you aligned with SJWs, btw. In case you couldn't catch it. Also, if there's correlationary arguments against porn and other sexually focused things just as there is correlationary arguments for it within that video, you have to decide which ones take precedence over the others and what sort of balance there will be. If there are those arguments against porn, then that video provides impetus for a systematic analysis of the data and not a conclusive policy decision. I have even played such games, but like with Hatred, I believe they need to be rated appropriately for adults and not children. The only reason I don't advocate for some sort of age verification system for adult games online with short time-outs is because it's another DRM (and I was at one point a gamer) and too big-brothery. Where a free market and authorityless solution can be implemented in practical terms without allowing easy access to the content for children, I am in favor of it, along with decentralized solutions, over the centralized.

Intothekey @Intothekey Sep 30, 2017, 1:20:46 PM EDITED
@Slaughtz I agree with this snipped-- If you're going to consume porn, it should be looked down upon culturally and as something only a minority do. However I do agree with calling the old religious right SJW's, because they were. They used government laws to enforce morality instead of protecting the individual (the governments job) The difference I would say is that the religious right were promoting good behavior but used violence to force people to comply. While SJW's are promoting bad behavior and forcing people to comply.

Slaughtz @Slaughtz Sep 30, 2017, 2:19:54 PM
@Intothekey 'call the old religious right SJWs' This seems only so that you don't have to confront the Christian character and origin of the censorship. They used to be called Christian fundamentalists. Calling them 'SJW' is inaccurate since the distinguishing characteristic of an SJW is their active suppressing of content for ... social justice. Not religious justice. Difference. One is (((secular))) and the other is not. Maybe outside America this doesn't make any sense to people, but in America there is the first amendment which makes the distinction important. There is no religious reason behind the SJW's actions.

Intothekey @Intothekey Sep 30, 2017, 3:25:35 PM
@Slaughtz I guess if you want to get technical. But the bottom line is that they both suppress free-speech in order to suite their personal beliefs. They're both authoritarians who censored those who disagree. They're behavior is uncannily similar so it's a fair comparison to make. Sjw's are modern day moral busy body authoritarians. And when it comes to censorship and Christianity, People have often used the bible to control people but this is true for anything that claims to have authority. There is no verses I can think of that support censorship.


Slaughtz @Slaughtz Sep 30, 2017, 3:51:22 PM EDITED
@Intothekey the justification in the bible is being against prostitution. Essentially recording sin and then watching it for a purpose other than an activist purpose is just foreign and odd to the Christian. That is like watching murder tapes and it goes against their tastes to even consider watching those things unless necessary. Comparing is fine, but they are not SJWs. You might as well call every authoritarian and morally proscriptive movement SJW when some of it really very justified and some of it is not. Calling them SJW is an obvious referwnce to your disagreement but it ignores the purpose and dilutes the purpose of 'SJW' to go around calling ones outside the proper context the same thing. You might as well be calling everyone nazi. And here is the source for fundamentalism [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

-OP interjects: "Censorship is censorship. I don't care where it comes from, it must not stand."-


Last edited by Slaughtz on Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:30 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 2070
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 34
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:29 am

There is always censorship.

The leftist wants to own your soul, he wants you to think like he does, he needs you but he also wants to dominate your mind. Feminine tactics.

N.S wants to put degenerates into an (metaphorical) oven or into a swamp outside the village.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 2070
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 34
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:37 am

No censorship is ultimately shitlib or cuckservative talk.
They want to hide the censorship and they don't want anybody to openly and directly shut up them -> feminine advantage.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 14993
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 51
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:16 pm


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism.

Back to top Go down
 
The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism.
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 2 of 2Go to page : Previous  1, 2
 Similar topics
-
» Hi, Newbie from Western Sydney, Surgery in 15 days
» Stomach bugs & the sleeve (yukky subject..sorry)
» Hi all From Rockingham WA
» Idea to get your protein for the day
» sleeve pricing on private waiting list - Adelaide; Dr. Leong.

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: