Brain Gender - Fact or Fiction?

I conducted this study, after a transsexual told me that Scientists can prove brain gender by looking at MRI scans.
This particular transsexual has repeatedly told me several bogus claims, so-called "facts" that were livid fictions and were downright falsities, so I decided to research their claims on my own. This particular claim was a mix of both fiction and fact.

Here is what webmd.com says about the matter.

webmd.com wrote:

A 2015 study at Tel Aviv University used an interesting and very thorough approach to compare the structure of male and female brains. Researchers looked at MRI scans of more than 1,400 people.

First, they measured the amount and location of gray matter (sometimes called "thinking matter") in 116 parts of the brain to find out which areas had the biggest sex differences. Next, the team scored these areas on each scan as either falling into the "female-end" zone, the "male-end" zone, or somewhere in the middle.

It turned out that maybe 6 in every 100 of the brains they studied were consistently a single sex. Many others had a patchwork quilt of masculine and feminine features that varied widely from person to person.

To check their findings, the team used similar methods to analyze more than 5,500 people's personality traits and behavior. While some activities were more common in women (including scrapbooking, chatting on the phone, and keeping in touch with mom) and others in men (such as golfing, playing video games, and gambling), 98% of those studied didn't fit a clear-cut gender profile.

Overall, the findings suggest that "human brains do not belong to one of two distinct categories."

However.

webmd.com wrote:

'Brain Road Maps' Reveal Differences
While the MRI research mainly focused on brain structures, another scientist has been exploring the nerve pathways that link them, like a highway system for the brain's traffic.

We know that hormones influence brain development in the womb, yet before age 13, boys' and girls' mental circuitry appears similar. During puberty, hormones may again have a powerful effect and contribute to rewriting the teen brain.

webmd.com wrote:

Women have more connections going left and right across the two halves of the brain. This could give them an advantage in pulling together information from different sources and drawing conclusions. The left half of the brain handles logical thinking, and the right is associated with intuition.

Men's brains have more connections from front to back, which may heighten their perception. They may be more attuned to what's going on around them so they can take action. Men have stronger connections between brain areas for motor and spatial skills. That means males tend to do a better job at tasks that need hand-eye coordination and understanding where objects are in space, such as throwing a ball or hammering a nail.

On average, male brains are about 10% larger than female brains.

MRIs showed the biggest gaps between the sexes were the larger amount of gray matter women had in their hippocampus, a structure that plays a role in memory, and the left caudate, which is thought to control our communication skills. Verma found that in female brains, there's more wiring in regions linked to memory and social cognition.

These findings have been confirmed via hormonal testing. 4 months of estrogen administered to males results in 1/4 cup brain size loss. But perhaps less is more?

Personally I have become an advocate of booze, during the brief moments when I am drunk I lose my social anxiety and can function like a normal person. My brain is bigger than normal and I cannot fit into average sized hats. I have sex very little if at all, not due to choice. Perhaps having a big brain is a burden.

However, if I was the ruler of the world, I would do genetic experiments on people and give them bigger brains. I think the reason my big brain is a burden is because I have very few if any people I can relate to. I do not think big brains are a burden in of themselves.

Is it really true that gender identity is totally absent among nonhuman species — even our closest evolutionary relatives, chimpanzees and bonobos? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Discover Magazine (@DiscoverMag) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Genes to memes - memes are extensions/projections of genes.

Gender is the memetic extension of evolved genetic reproductive roles.
Evolution shapes body & mind, and not one or the other.
Gender is the social application of genetic reproductive roles - given a behavioural and semiotic limitation/representation, corresponding to the particular memes/culture's essence - its evolved relationship with a specific environment, having experienced specific events - a shared history, known and unknown.
A culture represents how a specific genetic population affected and was affected by the environment it emerged or migrated into, and evolved in isolation.
Isolation may have been externally imposed or internally imposed - that is it may have been geographic or climatic or it may have been cultural, imposing inter-breeding that developed specific traits more than others.

If mind is a manifestation of brain processes and not a mystical, divine force, then brain (genetic) manifests gender (memetic)....because gender is how sexual reproductive roles are integrated into socioeconomic environments.

Culture does not emerge from nowhere or nothing.
Culture is a manifestation - externalization, via art, including language - of a historical relationship between a specific population and a specific environment, both fluctuating over time.

This relationship can be transmitted, obviously, because it is already externalized via semiotics, i.e., symbols, words, rituals, traditions, establishing a particular world-view and habits.
This is the outward expression of a cultivated relationship.
Cultural produces different civilizations, each emerging within a specific time/space, expressing the culture and its understanding up to that point in space/time.

Imagine that...sex has to do with hormones.
So, twins, one male one female, will not shares the same muscle mass, skeletal development nor brain development.
Revolutionary.
I thought it was socially determined.
Wait, no its gender that is socially determined, cramping sex into tis ideological boxes, or completely negating it with words...and "hormonal therapy".
But you have to intervene early, before nature starts producing those unwanted changes, and begin to "correct the child" according to your ideology - subjectively - before it knows what the fuck is going on with beautiful corrective hormonal interventions and, primarily, with linguistic interventions. Then we'll cover it all up by declaring all identities social constructs.

They learned this strategy from the best....those chosen to be divinely inspired:
Accuse the adversary of your own practices; cry out in pain as you whip the world into form; practice the opposite of what you preach; apply your benevolence arbitrarily.

Feelings are automatic, biological, reactions to reality. They are not reality.

Sex = evolves reproductive specialization expressed through traits that facilitate said specialization, to a greater or lesser degree.
Gender = socioeconomic, cultural adaptation of sexual specialized reproductive roles.

Individual inheritance - determining organ hierarchies - in relation to environment - natural or artificial( definition has been provided) - determines sexual effectiveness and, consequently gender.
So, morons out there, all that exists can be said to be "natural" since it emerges in world and nature is sometimes used as a synonym for world.
As in Jupiter is natural.
Gravity is natural.
So mutations merge. naturally, and if they offer an advantage they are reproduced, if they are neutral thye may be reproduced or may not, and fi they offer a disadvantage they do not reproduce. Reproduction is the measure of fitness.
Adaptation and reproduction...not my rules.

Here's the point, postmodern degenerate imbeciles out there, man intervenes to "correct" nature, to accord with his personal or ideological preferences severely altering what is "fit" to what is unfit outside manmade environment.
Some of these freaks would die within a day if society collapsed.
Human being intervene upon natural processes - such as culling - to preserve mutations that are disadvantageous - such as stupidity. In so doing, idiocies become popular, over time....like transsexuality, like nihilism, like paedophilia, bestiality etc...until the entire system, preserving said unfit mutations, collapses - imploding from the consequences of its own interventions - see the US and what is occurring there.
Ideologically founded evaluations cannot survive nature, or reality...not for long.
When the percentage or morons, within a group, exceeds the number of geniuses, the scales are tipped..and the inevitable is going to happen.
A system can survive a few imbeciles...but not a majority of imbeciles.
It can survive a few degenerates but not when they exceed a certain point.

Man cannot change the Laws of Nature governing the cosmos he emerges within - is thrown into (Dasein).
He can't invent his own reality, and if he does he cannot survive for long unless there's another present to protect him (shelter him) when he immerses himself in his private delusions.
Morality did not emerge from nowhere and from nothing. A man, in some distant past, did not suddenly decide what was moral and what was immoral, then imposing it on others for millennia.
morality remains common across species, and cultures. The core principles remain the same. What changes is the window dressing, the preparation, preparation. Like nutrition is common across species and cultures, and what differs is degree and combinations preparation, and presentation.
We consume the same nutrients as cows and dogs and plants; we all consume solar energy, some directly, some via a proxy processor, others through two proxy processors....
Morality is the same in dogs, in cats, in pigs, in dolphins, in Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Christians, Satanists; same themes, same behaviours, same objectives....what differs is ethics, addendums adjusting morality to specific ideologies, with particular objective - their own idea of a perfect man since perfection is non-existent.

But why waste my time on you demented, stupid simpletons when I can use this bearded, salt of the earth, Christian, Americanised, modern, to state the obvious and do the work for me?

You think this America can survive in a world full of Muslims, Russians and Chinese?
This little freak is going to go off to war to defend America?


The end is near.
Postmoderns will find something to blame, and it is all them.
They wont accept responsibility because it's all 'inevitable', and they are 'innocent'.
It's in the nature of the universe.

Ha!!!

Postmodern degenerates - trapped in Abrahamic, Marxist, ethics - replace the creator god concept with humanity.
How does this unfold?

Well, instead of some external entity, consciousness, creating the world out of nothing, they replace god with humanity, and so existence, world, is created by man.
They can't let go of a benevolent, intentional, conscious, rational creator.
They need someone, something to grovel before.
They need existence to be rational - meaning, absolutely ordered.

So, gender must be a social construct, just like race.
Man creates and so man can recreate.
World becomes malleable, pliable to human linguistics, expressing human reason.
It's not man's reason emerging and adapting to the world, but the world adapting and emerging from man's reasoning.
Gender can't be the socioeconomic, cultural, adaptation of naturally evolved reproductive roles, but sex must come from nothing and nowhere - like all creation does, you see?
The same goes for morality.
From nothing the creator creates it - mankind is now replacing the one-god.

But such delusions can only survive if all are on-board and there is no challenge, no alternative, no competition, just like communism.
So, the only way mankind can create whatever world it so desires is if all are in agreement - if it becomes a collective project.
No unbelievers will be tolerated. We se why messianism cannot tolerate other gods, other world-views....all must be assimilated or erased.
It's binary morality cannot survive multiplicity - all must be unified into oneness, and those who resist - the evil noes - must be exterminated.
No pagan tolerance of other gods, here.
Monotheism declares their one and only god as universal, or as how it ought to be and will be.
This is where the "on the right side of history" bullshyte comes from.
This is why they deny free-will. It's all inevitable, you see?
It's 'written in the stars', its the telos - though some deny it altogether.
Universe, god, whatever...it has a singular goal, an objective, a telos...and the goal, the end, is unification - oneness.
Salvation.
Don't fight it....accept it...it is fated.
But if it is inevitable why do they fight so passionately?
Because they are chosen to be the divine's agencies....they are on the "right side of history"....they are deus tools, chosen to bring about this coming end.
You aren't...that's why you reject their superstitious delusions...but they know, though they sometimes doubt themselves...but they have faith and know their fate.
You don't, so you fight it, as if you can ever change it...fools.

Genetic range, expressing spectrum of probabilities, are inversely proportional to environmental stress – threats, imposing limits and selecting a median, tending towards uniformity. As such we see in the Russian experiment with foxes, that sheltering reduces stress which allows for the expression of latent mutations to emerge, no longer carrying a severity of consequences that would inhibit their expression, e.g., foxes began to exhibit a range of fur pigmentation since colouration no longer determined survival probabilities. We can say that human sheltering has allowed mutations to be expressed wince sexuality no longer carries a survival cost.
Domestication protects organism's form the price of certain mutations, allowing man to cultivate them in other organisms, according to his needs/desires, offering his protection, cultivating dependence. [ MANifesto: Nature – Nurturing – Domestication]
We see the same with human domestication, cultivating codependence by protecting mutations from the severity of their effect upon the individual organism.
Under such protective, farm like, environments, there is no end to what kind of mutations may arise and be permitted to flourish unhindered by natural limits, such as diseases, predation, physical/mental symmetry/proportionality etc.
The age of the mutant has arrived, and physical and spiritual (behavioural) ugliness will be its marker.