Nature's indifferent injustices - as they perceive them - are the "evil" they must defeat.
It's like fighting against existence itself for being what it is.
But this freak also dismisses free-will altogehter...so what is he trying to change if its all inevitable and determined?
Who are these "objectivists" and why are they "responsible" when nobody else is?
Testament bullshyte...it needs an evil doer to make goodness discernible.
But if god created everything, and is good, then how does evil exist?
We need a loophole...Satan.
So objecitvists are this loophole.
All is determined, including objectivists, but somehow they are accountable whereas nobody else is.
This was the imbecile Brian's mistake.
He didn't believe in free-will either, yet he accused judges and the police for what happened to him...not what he did to himself...but what happened to him.
Not surprisingly, he is also a Marxist.
So what is he fighting against if all is determined?
Evil capitalists who, for some reason, do have a choice.
The choice is also straight out of the Bible - the choice to not eat the forbidden fruit, or eat it and go to the place of eternal suffering.
Another remarkable dilemma in an entirely determined world.