Know Thyself
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalSearchRegisterLog in

Share
 

 Objective <> Subjective

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10 ... 16  Next
AuthorMessage
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyMon Aug 24, 2015 2:52 pm

The brain evolved to connect this internal and external stream of data.
It's primary function is to judge, to evaluate, the external, objective, as it relates to its needs.

The "apple is good" is meaningless without connecting this "good for" with an organic need, related to the organism's nature/past, and the apples particular traits as these relate to these organic needs.
The first value judgments were in relation to the "idea(l) of survival, self-maintenance.

When an organism becomes more sophisticated then this idea(l) can be a projection, an intent.
Intelligence is "good" only means something when the motive of intelligence is connected to the idea(l) it facilitates.
The traits of intelligence are evaluated in relation to a desirable goal, a motive, an idea(l) state.

Therefore, the perception of a phenomenon, begins with discrimination, discerning it among other phenomena, separating it, distinguishing it.
The phenomenon's particular traits are analyzed, and evaluated in relation to a idea(l) which the organism wishes to attain.
The degree that the desirable trait(s) is present in the particular phenomenon determines its value, in relation to this idea(l).

All value judgments are references to an idea(l).


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
Lyssa

Gender : Female Posts : 8965
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyMon Aug 24, 2015 3:01 pm

Satyr wrote:
The brain evolved to connect this internal and external stream of data.
It's primary function is to judge, to evaluate, the external, objective, as it relates to its needs.  

The "apple is good" is meaningless without connecting this "good for" with an organic need, related to the organism's nature/past, and the apples particular traits as these relate to these organic needs.
The first value judgments were in relation to the "idea(l) of survival, self-maintenance.

When an organism becomes more sophisticated then this idea(l) can be a projection, an intent.
Intelligence is "good" only means something when the motive of intelligence is connected to the idea(l) it facilitates.
The traits of intelligence are evaluated in relation to a desirable goal, a motive, an idea(l) state.

Therefore, the perception of a phenomenon, begins with discrimination, discerning it among other phenomena, separating it, distinguishing it.
The phenomenon's particular traits are analyzed, and evaluated in relation to a idea(l) which the organism wishes to attain.
The degree that the desirable trait(s) is present in the particular phenomenon determines its value, in relation to this idea(l).

All value judgments are references to an idea(l).



Good post.

That's what socratism did, cut off the ideal and idealized in itself: like "virtue is good" became The good than good for what?
"Virtue is good" became an idealism in itself with no connection to an organic ideal.

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyMon Aug 24, 2015 3:13 pm

The idea(l), in turn, is determined to be superior/inferior, by the objective/world.
The organism's evaluation are not automatically accurate, they are measured against a world which is indifferent to the subjective evaluation of the idea(l).
The subjective mind may evaluate goodness but it may be mistaken.
The world determines the accuracy of projected idea(l) and its evaluation.

A mind may value levitation greatly, considering it "good", but the world does not care what the organisms thinks, and levitation, no matter how "good" The organism thinks it is, may be a delusion, and not only not-good, but impossible.
The idea(l) must not only be "good" but it must be possible, real, and not a noetic construct, a delusion, a fantasy.
it's "goodness' may only exist as a possibility in the mind of the organism and it may be meaningless outside the mind.
Like the "goodness" or "badness' of unicorns.
The unicorn being a pure noumenon, with no references outside the human skull. An amalgamation of abstractions, recombined in a novel way which refers to nothing real.
in this case the "goodness" of the unicorn is an irrelevant value judgment.
It's "goodness' may be only founded on its non-applicability, its non-existence - its purity as noumenon, protecting it from being measured in the real world.
Like the Christian "god".

This is what i mean by connecting the noumenon to the phenomenon.
We can all construct an idea(l) that is "good" forever, because it is never placed within reality - it being a pure noetic construct.
The idea(l) must be connected to the real otherwise it is useless, mind-candy, a delusion that may entertain and comfort the organism but is a fantasy.
The utility of the idea(l) is just as important as its intent, its "goodness".

The pragmatic value of an idea(l) is also determined by the world, and not decided by the organism.
The organism can imagine whatever it wants, as long as this detachment from reality is not costly (Modern sheltering being what keeps the costs of detachment down), but it cannot make what it fantasizes about real, unless it connects its idea(l) with the real, or adjusts it.
It is the idea(l), as a mental construct, which must adjust to the real, not the real to the idea(l).
It is the noumenon that must adjust to the phenomenon, not the other way around.

In a direct interpretation of phenomenon, the noumenon translates what the phenomenon is into a form it can comprehend, it can store, it can process.
It is what the phenomenon is which determines how the noumenon will translate it, unless the brain is damaged or nuder chemical effects, or ill.
Beauty is not subjective, since it is an interpretation of symmetry, fitness, or an interpretation of existential awe, possibilities, before order, for an organism dependent on order.




_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyTue Sep 01, 2015 4:44 pm

A man who is separated from his wife for a long period of time will produce more sperm, than usual, upon his return.
No matter how much he loves, respects, and trusts her, consciously, rationally, his body will not be convinced by the brain's judgments, nor by the social constructs that reassure it.
No human institutions, rules, or words of love and eternal devotion can sway it.
It knows of a deeper, more vicious, truth.
The body, evolved to deal with nature's indifferent cruelty, has a "logic" of its own; has developed a judgment over hundreds of thousands of years of trial and error, and founded on experiences that precedes the individual’s personal experiences and its immediate awareness.
No mind can override this completely, with its meagre lifetime of training, and institutionalized learning.
The man’s body, despite his mind, adjusts to circumstances, free of all manmade morals, ideals, and values.
It was made to deal with the real, not the idea(l).

For the female it is the same.
She may despise a man, rationally, hold him in contempt, have a low opinion of him and for his behaviour, and still, if the occasion arises, her body will scream out its unmistakable approval with a spontaneous, uncontrollably convulsing, "Yes, Yes, my god yes!!!" that leaves no room for misinterpretations, and word-games.
Conversely, she may consciously adore a man, hold him in high esteem, think the world of him, appreciate him and his spirit, rationally, agree with his mind, be charmed by his wit, and despite this, her body, with unresponsive coldness will pronounce its own final judgment with an unequivocal "No, no, this man, this past, these genes, these memories, do not deserve my sacrifices, my time. No more than this gift can I offer in gratitude, not as complete approval of mind and body."

The woman may lay down with man out of pity, out of spite against her own body’s unresponsiveness, as the unyielding proclamation of her idea(l)’s superiority, its dominance, over nature, her own nature; a gesture of disapproval for nature’s injustices, her unwarranted cruelty upon him, and still her body will not follow.

The idea(l), of course – a least for her, because a man's sexual judgments are less stringent and more exploitative – is the "complete package", or "Mr. Right", as these modern females call this elusive mate.
The one who can receive both her mind's and her body's complete approval, with a resounding unison of "Yes, such a man is worthy of my complete submission".

In our age of human interventions, and the hedonistic idea(l) that all are deserving, disparity between mind/body, particularly in the female sex, is the norm.
Many a marriage remain viable because of the female's partial, or complete, dissatisfaction, and disapproval, whereas the male is content with the illusion, with her "faking it", because his sex is less demanding, and more easily gratified, and because he is simply happy to be approved, even if hypocritically.

Whatever idea(l)s have fertilized the mind, the body remains unimpressed, at least immediately.
It may be affected, in time, and only after the mind has imposed itself, consistently, causing the body to shrivel, and only when it has gained some dominance over the body, some control – or only as much as it has managed to do so.
The brain's power is time dependent.
It imposes itself upon the body's automated, honest, reactions only with great effort, and only after a period of long, and persistent training.
If the brain continues with its impositions, a total breach is inevitable.
If not a mind/body split, necessitating a splintering of the mind, because the body still needs the brain to function, then dis-ease, a sense of discomfort in its own skin, a sense of disorientation; a neurological effect, produced by the stress of having to integrate disagreeing elements in the same organization.
Habit, a regimented, disciplined adherence to formalities, can establish a precarious peace; the mind dominating, as momentary victor, over body, and its presence as the manifestation of past.
But let us push this line of reasoning further, following the neurological pathways back to the source.
Fantasies, fetishes, irrational obsessions, are found lurking in the deepest crevices of the human body.
The cells, adopting imagery from consciousness to make themselves heard, speak to the brain in the only language it can understand, but the message, being the result of memories that span centuries, from a time before the birth of the organism, is presented in a convoluted, metaphorical way, leaving the brain wondering what it's all about.
Let us now take the lead from Nietzsche and Jung, if not Freud only, and discover in dreams the body communicating its wisdom to the brain.
In sleep, when the nervous system is cut-off from external stimulation, from sensual sources, the body continues transmitting messages to the brain.
No longer burdened with two sources of stimulation, an internal and an external one, the internal takes over, flooding the brain with its imagery, its sensations and symbols.
Irrational fears, confused imagery, fantastic unreal combinations, all bubble-up from our internal networks, connecting billions of cells, each with a life of its own. This is the source of oneness, the idea of universal consciousness.
The Modern dedicated to noumena, obsessed with the subjective, presents himself as the happy sleepwalker, a dreamer of the unreal – a member of a collective unconscious.
The transmissions are unclear, because the body has no sense of temporal continuity, and it adopts imagery, symbols, and words, from the waking mind, to make itself known, if not understood.
With Moderns this collective dream is their inter-subjective idealism.
Within it, everything is possible, it is comforting, ordered, it is romantic, and irrationally rational; everything is imbued with meaning.
In dream the body conveys its memories, its wisdom, its judgments, most of them stored in cells for centuries, and lacking a formal language it adopts the one the conscious mind uses. In dream the body communicates with the brain, in the only way it can, and at the only period in time when the brain is open to its communications without disturbances from the external world.

Do we hear it?
Can we make sense of what it is telling us?
When the body speaks, there is no doubt, no lies, no ulterior motives – these are tools of the mind, the methods of the dream-interpreters, the priests.
The body speaks of past, as it does of presence.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyThu Sep 24, 2015 10:29 am

Of course individuals engaging reality, the world, honestly, and motivated only by a desire to find clarity.
All are part of the same world, and perceiving it accurately, and basing your idea(l)s on the appreciation of it, would, of course, converge in agreement.
Those who share the same environment and base their objectives, ideals, within this environment will reach agreement, if not on the path towards it, then only on its value.


Of course, minds unbound by a world, wanting to escape it rather than engage, it obsessed with self-referential personal subjective "reality" would exhibit diversity in the subjectivity each one prefers to live within.
With no external, to them, world to restrict their fantasies, each one would diverge into whatever delusion (s)he prefers, and would only agree upon the "right" to live within whatever world each ones desires.

An objective mind is not restricted by an external will, a god, an institution, a mind, (s)he is restricted by the world and its patterns which his thinking and values must harmonize with.

A Modern, using subjectivity, perspectivism, cynicism to defend hiss/her hedonistic motives would consider this undesirable, too restrictive, brutal.
In this collective inter-subjectivity (s)he finds the "excuse" to imagine himself/herself as whatever brings him/her pleasure, and thinks (s)he has escaped the determining, immutable past which (s)he is a manifestation of.



_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyTue Nov 10, 2015 8:28 am

Objective = the world, matter/energy, the apparent, the observed: (inter)activity; a subjective approach towards the ongoing Flux - an ordering of the fluctuating: noumenon deciphering phenomenon by extricating self, as a corruptible component, to reach for the godly perspective, clarity.

Subjective = the mind, noumenon, the observer; an interpretation/translation, using a medium of stimuli constructing abstractions, mental models, by simplifying/generalizing the fluctuating into static imagery/symbols/ later to be represented by words.

It is these mental models projected first as orienting destinations, and later as desirable ideals, reaching the absurdity of absolutes (utopia) which the observing organism uses as its standard to evaluate self, and all phenomena in it perceptual vicinity.
It judges all in accordance to this destination, this objective.
It feels victorious when it overcomes an obstacle in its way, standing between itself and this goal, and defeated when ti cannot surpass, overcome: ashamed.

The world cares not for ideals. It simply is, and it is fluctuation, dynamic, (inter)activity of patterns with no goal, to motive, no sense of self, no awareness, just patterns, ordering, disordering, fragmenting, uniting, and all tending gradually towards the chaotic, the random.
The objective, being a projection of an ordering mind, promising higher order, is a resistance, a reaction to this entropy.
Chaos happens, it is not willed. It happens without effort, simply through the mechanism of (inter)action.
The tragic/comedy of the human condition: that with every attempt to resist it contributes to what is resisted - resentiment.  

To believe that you construct reality in your mind, that the objective world is a product of your subjectivity, is the Judeo-Christian/Islamic Nihilistic idea(l) in all its glory. Seductive, easy, inspiring, effective when manipulating weakness, inferiority, immaturity.
Eroticism, the pleasure principle, is dominant within a more base mind - one governed by its animal instincts.
Those who cannot endure the indifference of world, escape internally, dive into their psyche, hide there, and there they build empires; there they are formidable warriors.
This method can be transmitted, using words, to other minds - those that cannot dive inwards or have failed to build convincing internal empires.
the Priest offers these minds a replica of his own, and they are grateful, and forever dependent on him filling in the details of their fantasy.
An artist reigns over the inartistic, the dull of mind, the ones who have neither the imagination nor the courage to create their own delusions.

The world passes by, before their senses, unnoticed, ignored, denied....the spirit of the Nihilist finds a nest in art...in the magic of the word as toy and not as tool.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyTue Nov 10, 2015 8:43 am

The Hellenes, for those who have imagined themselves as being Greek, had a word for truth, and it was not the same as the one the Romans gave it, forever infecting western man with their Latin misinterpretations.

The word was αλήθεια (alethiea)....to re-call, to re-member, to un-cover.
What its un-covered but that which is without our interventions.
What is re-called but that which we are, and know not (know thyself).

Man does not will existence into existence, he discovers it there, as it was and will be, before and after his presence.
Words were invented to symbolize that which is exposed, disclosed, un-covered - giving it a name, a symbol, an abstraction.

Outside this role words are playthings for cowards and fakes.
They do not wish to re-connect what is distant, covered, forgotten, denied - but want to disconnect, detach, and feel this as "freedom", as power.
Nihilism is seductive because of this - it offers multiplicity because it is not limited by the world.
It can imagine itself, it's world, as anything; it can construct any identity, and be corrected by nothing as it accepts nothing outside itself as a standard; it feels lost, dissatisfied, seeking out a replacement standard, internally, falling prey to emotion, to manipulation, to feel-good objectives, to unifying constructs.
What tit loses in quality it tries to make up with quantities - seducing numbers to its delusion, making it a shared project, is how it reinforces the negation of world, helping it live, a lifetime, within its own constructs: it is why it always wants to change world, for the "better" - better meaning its own disconnected fantasies.



_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyWed Nov 11, 2015 8:51 am

A battle over the soul of European man, between Classicism and Romanticism - each given a different name (symbol) to represent it within different contexts.
It is a battle of awareness, that will determine how man interprets, relates, to world - his word-view.  

Classicism vs. Romanticism - Hellenism vs. Europe - Reason vs. Emotion/Felling/Fantasy...the Masculine vs. the Feminine.

Paganism confronted by Judeo-Christianity, Marxism, Humanism...

The Objective vs. surrender to the Subjective.
Realism vs. Idealism.

The two poles that cannot unite.

Flux of patterns, ordering but never complete vs. Positive/Negative, God/Satan, 1/0 certainty, romantic apex of desire, longing satiated.

European romanticism through the dis-ease of Christianity, of the Modern "last man", full of love, value, positivism...words floating in the noetic spheres where all is possible, and all is wonder-full.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyWed Nov 11, 2015 11:06 am

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Hellenic balance between the two.
Let us become a bridge.


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyTue Nov 17, 2015 6:21 am

1st Level of Cognition
Awareness of other in relation to need/suffering; other as (re)congized pattern promising satiation of the sensation of self as existing – Subjectivity.
Consciousness of Otherness.
Self is perceived as (inter)activity with otherness, felt as stress producing need/suffering.
Other is the source of both pain and pleasure; pain/pleaser are self.  

2nd Level of Cognition
Awareness of self, as other, amongst others; as (re)cognized pattern differing from others (self as not-other) – Hyper-Subjectivity.
Self as Other.
Self is perceived as pattern, amongst patterns, with particular differences that distinguish it.
Other and self are the source of pain and pleasure.  

3rd Level of Cognition
Awareness of self from the projected perception of other; alienation of self from self – Objectivity.
Self through Other.
Self is approached from the vantage point of an otherness; projected consciousness.

4th level of Cognition
Awareness of self and other from the projected perception of a whole; relationship of self with otherness as a one – Hyper-Objectivity.
Self and Other.
Self, and Other become part of a unity, approached from a noetic vantage point of a detached, consciousness – God.
Confusion of self as other, and other as self.  

5th level of Cognition
Awareness of self and other from the projected perception of a non-whole, from the vantage point of detached, indifferent consciousness – Supra-Objectivity.
Reaffirmation of self as other than other, with no end.
The self is distinguished more clearly, more precisely, as a pattern, among patterns, forever self-ordering, similar to other patterns, but forever other-than.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyWed Nov 18, 2015 12:57 pm

In the wild, outside human environments, and human interventions, there is no debate over who is superior and who is inferior, who appreciated world, and self within it, and who overestimated or underestimated.
The answer is quick, obvious and brutal - world, nature, indifferent to the particular perspective of each individual.
No human judge, no god, no democratic process is appealed to.
It is the subjective mind that pays the price for its inaccuracy, its error, its disharmony, in relation to world as (inter)acting patterns - randomness factoring in as chance, genetic drift, the unforeseeable.

If someone misjudges beauty, with his beholding, the consequences are present in offspring, and the objective judgment is in the outcome if this offspring within world.
To be objective is to approach subjectively the closest to appreciating world outside personal desires, needs, hopes, superstitions, upbringing.

Now, within human environments where man intervenes upon nature, the rules change. The objective, in this environment, is the appreciation of how inter-subjective dynamics (inter)act in relation not to nature, but in relation to an established institutionalized "order" which may or may not he in agreement to the natural/past world intervened upon.
This last is political, and is about evaluating the variants of subjective opinions as these harmonize with a shared, often imposed, idea(l).

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyFri Nov 20, 2015 7:03 am

We must be more like the old and wise Dædalus who never soared so far up that he lost sight of the ground, and not like young, naïve, Ikarus who, forgetting the warnings of experience was taken over by exuberance and soared higher towards the sun, as if he were master of space and time.
Because from the earth we come and to the earth we must return, and if we wish to return with our integrity intact, and not broken, then the earth’s rotating consistency, producing gravity, we must never overlook; underestimating her unforgiving mass, and overestimating the artifices we construct trying to escape, dreaming of flying above and away.


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyFri Nov 20, 2015 9:23 am

If the noumenon, referring to a phenomenon, remains vague and uncertain, and only proposes superiority, then how much more vague is a noumenon referring to nothing but another noumenon, or combination of abstractions, with no external reference point?

If we can build a castle on words, and shared fantasies, then what use do we have of reality?
Our validation comes from self, from inside, from the emotional reward these words inspire in us - sensations bubbling up from internal caverns, mysterious sources, stimulating the nervous system and making us feel alive, special, powerful, impregnable after we have been impregnated by a clever intrusive external source - subtly worming itself inside to place its seed.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptySun Nov 22, 2015 7:20 pm

When the objective is something other than the approach of the subjective toward clarity, understanding of it as world, then the subjective takes precedence and replaces the objective with its own subjective projections, based on the individual's particular past/nature.  
The world ceases to be an objective, and is ignored, or forgotten, or buried in the subjective, and renamed another subjective.

Past experiences may corrupt the intention of the subjective mind, emotion cloud its motives, ego overtake its relationship to otherness.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyMon Nov 23, 2015 7:00 pm

The object of philosophy is man’s relationship with time.
His preparation, in contemplation, of death, is this most distinctly human dialogue with existence.
Every relationship is measured by its honesty, and with philosophy an honest appreciation of existence, and of a self relating to it, demands honesty, the courage to stand naked before, vulnerable and weak.
Philosophy is the name we give this relationship of man with existence.
If man hides, or tries to hide reality from him, the rapport is sickly, unhealthy.
A lover approaches the object of his love with openness, with a desire to explore every part of her, absorb every inch, every scent, every texture into his mind and body – wanting to make her a part of him.
This is the approach of a lover of wisdom must have towards the object of his wisdom, the object that gives birth to it, the world, existence.
His wisdom is the love-child of this intimate contact of subject with object, observer with observed, man and world.
Harsh and cruel the loved one can be, but if the lover truly loves, he persists, he does not give-in, and he persists.


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyTue Nov 24, 2015 11:32 am

Unless one is sensually deficient, suffering from a sens organ dysfunction, and unless one is neurologically deficient and is suffering from a neurological dysfunction, the world is common, and all phenomena within it translated/interpreted in the same way, or, at least, in a way that acknowledges the perception of the same divergences in quality, that I call a divergence in pattern, in vibration.

The first will be unable to share the same world, on the same level as another with healthy sense organs (nervous system collecting external stimuli), and the latter will be unable because his internal neural network is corrupting his perceptions.
To these categories we can add the brain dysfunctional ones, who either because of these deficiencies, or because the brain is dysfunctional when its senses and nervous system are healthy, cannot process and understand these stimulation.
In nature such individuals would face the expected consequences, but when they are protected within human environments, and given rights, then the dysfunction expresses itself in ways which are often subtle, and when they are not, can be justified by using the philosophical position of subjectivity, or perspectivism.
Despite this, human environments are not enclosed systems, no more than an organism is a completed being, and so they are still affected by a world they intervene upon, placing their construct between the individuals participating within them and the world that has been intervened upon but not totally pushed away.
Nevertheless, even this porous mitigating effect, suffices to permit deficiency to pretend all is subjective, and malleable using words, and human imagination.

I say this to explain how phenomena are not arbitrarily translated in whatever manner the individual prefers. They are interpreted more or less precisely, more or less effectively.
The phenomena and the succession they emerge in, the causal chain, is not accidental, and not affected by human fantasies, deficient or healthy with other motives, than clarity and engagement of man with world.
This is not where the "problem" arises for Nihilists, although this is where they fall back to, pretending they have a metaphysical grounding.
The problem arises when these phenomena, and how they (inter)act, how they relate with each other and consequently with the individual observing them, are evaluated - what value each individual places upon them.

Now, we must keep in mind the mitigating effect of human interventions, creating an artificial shell dominating human sensuality. this mitigating human shell of artifices, affects the evaluation of phenomena, and also produces phenomena that would have never emerges within this human intervention upon past/nature.
But this is not the issue either.
The issue is the idea(l)s constructed and moved towards, and how these phenomena, manmade or natural, influence the movement towards them.
This is where idealism comes in, not as the monopoly of the few, but as an organic projection, an orientation device, which, in man, has been converted to the absolute, and sometimes is so disconnected form reality, or is founded on human artifices, that it loses all meaning in the world outside human environments - socioeconomic cultural systems: memes.
With Nihilists, their ideals are completely, or partially, based on human artifices, intentionally chosen, or unintentionally adopted.  
Value is based no the individual's evaluation of the phenomenon and how it stands in his way, aids him, or is neutral in relation to his movement towards his objective, his idea(l).      
It is the relationship of the phenomenon with the projected idea(l) that determines its value, and how the individual judges them.

The phenomenon, whether it be human artifice, or natural element, is judged as the relationship of it to objective, as it relates to the subjective.
A mind interested in human constructs, undisturbed, not contradicted by natural phenomena (world outside human environments), will choose to compare artificial phenomena with his projected idea(l), as it relates to the subjective, and will evade being exposed by denying the meaning of "artificial", pretending that all that exists is natural, in the sense that it is the manifestation of past outside the emergence of human beings and human civilization.
This will make him prone to the easy evaluation of phenomena as it relates to how it affects human beings, and shapes human environments - this will be his primary care, his most pronounced ambition, measured numerically, quantitatively, by how many minds it can convince, coerce, and seduce.
He has no other external standard than the inter-subjective collective, of humanity; he accepts no other external standard, denying its existence.
The desire to live a life within your own reality, you as the sovereign, is enticing, and it is only possible when there's a protective shield between individual and world, or a collective mass of humanity, because outside of this the individual is faced with an indifferent, to his needs/desires, world, ordering and lacking order, (inter)acting in ways he is forces to humble himself before, so as to find patterns, to understand and to direct himself accordingly.

An objective understanding of world does not dismiss succession, or phenomena, or the reality of them, but attempts to find pattern within them.
His idea(l)s, goals, are based on the understanding of these phenomena, and the evaluation of these phenomena, separated into natural and artificial, are judged by how they add or subtract to his approach towards it.
His judgments, his idea(l)s, his principles, are not arbitrary, whimsical, because his motive is not to evade but to engage, even if this means failure; because his motive is not to comfort himself and please himself, but to see even if it pains him; because he thinks of life as an opportunity not a mission; because he does not dismiss the external, diving inward, but dives inward to better understand the external.

A individual can be challenged on his externalized evaluation, and never on his internalized ones, and this is why Nihilists prefer the safe world of subjectivity, where they can think and value whatever they want, in whatever manner they want, and they do not have to justify themselves, and their judgments, to anyone.
It an easy way to remain safe from objective reality.            

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyTue Nov 24, 2015 3:43 pm

Subjectivism, also called persepctivism, is relative to objectivity, an easy path, if there is a protective layer between self and world present.
All you need to do is extricate yourself from reality - something made easy in Modern systems - then base your assumptions on internal hierarchies, using words to manipulate concepts - usually emotion, pretending to be indifferent, and need, pretending to be independent - then fabricate an idea(l) that is both promising (positive) and seductive to the majority, because this magic only works when minds (other subjectivities) are supporting it, are assimilated into its premises - and then strive to make an impact, within man-made structures, produced and maintained by man-made artifices, that will quickly disappear when man disappears.
This is Nihilism, this is Modernity.
This is not philosophy.
The continuously adapting delusion, in relation to a reality it cannot deal with.

Bottom<>Up thinking begins with world, the sensually perceived, the apparent.
What is, before, beyond, above, human interventions, human involvement, human presence...human socioeconomic political systems.
Genes before Memes, so as to appreciate what memes are in relation to humans.

How would life be, if there were no humans present to impose their moral, idealism, their order?
That's the starting point, the foundation.
No personal ambition, no personal need, no emotion and preference - all objective evaluation of what is, outside human contrivances.
This, in itself is difficult enough...because it demands courage, the ability to hurt one's self with honesty, with clarity, with an understanding of nature/past.  
From here one advances upwards towards idea(l)s, preferences, goals, motives...objectives.
How one "ought to live" within this reality?
What is the best option, the best personal path, within this determining, immutable past/nature, manifesting as presence/appearance?
This is why I, as Satyr, cannot offer guidance, only advice, and whomever does otherwise is a fake, a charlatan, a conniving duplicitous miser with different ambitions, collecting, hoarding, accumulating mountains of flesh to shield himself from this world he despises, and pretends he loves.
We meet as homoioi, not as subordinate to master, or we do not meet at all.
Language as tool, not toy; words exposing, revealing, not concealing, seducing, manipulating, other, before self.    

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyTue Nov 24, 2015 6:09 pm

There is no 0/1.
These are linguistic symbols of the order/chaos duality.
Math is a language, not mystical, magical, stricture. it is not the new "word of god", a divine code.
It is a language, and like all languages it is a tool, which in Modern times, and in Nihilistic minds, has become a toy.

One symbolizes any dynamic vibration the mind can perceive, or potentially perceived, and interpret/translate into an abstraction - it is the abstraction, the noumenon, which is the "true" one.
The "one" is a static, vague, simplified/generalized representation, of a dynamic process - the idea(l) referring, or not, to the real, to the phenomenon.
It is more, or less precise, and more or less accurate.

Zero/Nil symbolizes the dynamic which cannot be perceived nor abstracted as noumenon, because ti lacks the pattern the mind needs to make sense of it - it is counter-intuitive, in relation to human intuition, disordering in relation to the mind's ordering.

Subjectivity relates to the objective abstractly, within this one/nil duality - as observer to observed, as organism relates to idea(l).

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
Lyssa

Gender : Female Posts : 8965
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyThu Dec 03, 2015 1:57 pm

Satyr wrote:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Hellenic balance between the two.
Let us become a bridge.


[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]



William Barrett, The Irrational Man.

He compares the rationalist platonists to Gulliver's Laputans...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyFri Dec 04, 2015 9:28 am

The objective, sanctified as the elusive, yet eternally guiding, is given the title "ideal", to differentiate it from all other objectives, expressing a subjective commitment to its superiority.
Movement toward it identifies, distinguishes the subjective mind, not its attainment.
It is a commitment based no self-respect, confidence in one's own judgments of world, and the discrimination between desirable and undesirable outcomes.
The idea(l) is the central point, in the wheel, which is never reached, but falls away as you approach it.
Movement toward it can come from multiple directions, making the approach a personal, subjective, agon, journey, without altering the ideal itself.
A noumenon glorified, becoming a shared identifier.
Movement towards it identifies the actor, but also distinguishes all other actors, though they approach form sometimes opposite directions; it orients all that move towards it, like a lighthouse orients all ships on the sea.
Its vicinity, recognition, distinguishes all actors as those who have already committed themselves and have covered some distance, just as the vicinity of the lighthouse to the ships, distinguishes them as those ships, on the chaos, on the ocean waters, which have approached the same shores, the same land, the same territory – they all see and are enlightened, inspired, by the same light, the same ideal.
The ideal acts as a planet in space, in the void, the darkness.
All satellites that have been captured by its mass are already a part of the planet.

The patterns called planet have already harmonized other patterns to their congruity.
These alien patterns, through still at a distance when compared to the ones we identify as planetary body, are already part of the planets mass.
The patterns participating in the proximity, tending towards the core, which is never stable, never concrete, have already appropriated these satellites, these meteors, moving in space, lost in the darkness.
Not part of a unity, but a congruity, tending, moving towards a center, a core that is never there, never static, never attained, and with each addition to the congruity the pressure increases, movement towards this absent center accelerated, until, at some point, light, emerges – as the fastest perceptible pattern, or congruity of patterns which cannot be differentiated by a human sense organ, interpreted as brilliance.

The pressure breaks down the patterns into smaller and smaller bits, each phase increasing uniformity – melting/melding the different patterns towards an absolute order, a singularity never attained.
Light signifies this approach towards the singular and has become, for man (an ordering congruity) a symbol of the divine: absolute order.
Symbol for God.
At the extreme as pressure increases, not even light can escape and inspire from a distance. Uniformity reaches a point of decreasing differentiation as one approaches the absolute singular.
Time /Space implode towards a core, a point always missing, absent.
Ironically the mind interprets the absence as black, as it also interprets absence of order as black, confusing complexity for chaos, thinking both are one and the same, because they are if one considers both approaches towards an absolute state: absolute order and absolute chaos two sides of the same coin – yin/yang.
Both nihilistic conceptions as both express an end to existence which is outside their absoluteness, as movement, (inter)activity.
1/0 symbols of non-existence, if taken literally.
Nihilism's polar opposites engulfing human conceptions within its premises: good/bad, God/Satan, being/non-being.
Existence is outside this intuitive symbolization, as movement towards and away – (inter)activity between patterned, tending towards order, and non-patterned, tending towards chaos energies/flows/vibrations.
Friction produced by this (inter)activity contributes to the movement towards increasing chaos – expanding space/time meaning expanding possibilities and diminishing probabilities.
At some point it becomes inevitable that in the randomness the near-absolute singularity, a new Big Bang, will emerge, repeating the cycle: not once but continuously.
  


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyFri Dec 04, 2015 1:37 pm

The subjective relates to the objective as judgment....interpretation.
The world need not care, and is inanimate care-free patterns (inter)acting.
It is the subjective mind that cares, and this is why it judges, evaluates, and this is why it benefits or pays the price for its own interpretations/judgments.

The world has no goal, to motive, it is activity with no objective.
It is the subjective mind, the human one, which projects upon it motive, direction, in relation to its own essence, measured against its own ordering.

To be objective is not an absolute state, it is an approach to the cosmic indifference, so as to achieve clarity unaffected by emotion, by interests.
To be objective is not the goal, no more than pleasure is the goal, or self is the goal, it is a means towards the goal.


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν


Last edited by Satyr on Fri Dec 04, 2015 1:59 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyFri Dec 04, 2015 1:50 pm

Cosmos is the word, given to the object the subject is interested in, if it is not involved in self, and escaping cosmos internally where there is no escape at all.

Cosmos is a dynamic process of (inter)acting patterned and non-patterned dynamism, call it energy with matter being a less dynamic form of it.
We can say that cosmos because of this continuous (inter)activity is a constant falling away, and subjective is the continuous approach.
Subjective mind cares about cosmos because it desires to continue to exist within it, and to advance towards it.
It cares because it is dependent, contingent upon it.
Self-maintenance, and advancement towards, is growth.
Because all is in continuous flux, the notion of "self" maintaining, is one describing an accumulation being acted upon, building upon what has been acquired/attained and what is being continuously lost.

To become objective is to approach cosmos by first reducing the need to self-maintain.
This is the focusing of mind upon objective - sharpening, clarifying, taking advantage of synergy when no other concern distracting and draining its energies.

Self is not a static thing, something pre-existing life, an absolute, but a reference to the past/nature which cannot be lost, because the loss would mean a breach in the continuity which is what self describes - harmony, of past and future, via the nexus of in congruity patterns, presence/present.
Self-maintenance, therefore, means the remembrance, the recalling, of this past which the self is a manifestation of, as appearance.
Know thyself refers to the recalling of past/nature, to not lose it, but to reaffirm it as present, and ongoing - make it lucid, clear, to bring it up into consciousness.
Life is this congruity of patterns maintaining its continuity within chaos and contradicting patterns, not part of its particular congruity.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyFri Dec 04, 2015 3:04 pm

The subjective/objective divide is at the core of the divide of reality and idealism, making Nihilism possible.
If we take the nervous system as the border, the dividing line, between mind and body, and recall that brain, through the senses collects data from outside the body, and the cells, the organs, send data to the mind through the nervous system, then subjectivism is the closing of the mind to the external sources, reducing them to illusion, dismissing them as of little importance, introverting the mind to the point where the internal data dominates over the external, the empirical data, sensual interpretations.
This inversion can only survive when there is a protective force, preventing the indifferent external world form intruding upon the subjective mind’s inversion – Nihilism is an inversion of reality.
The subjective, ceases to be a secondary part of the data flooding into the brain, where the external data takes precedence, and becomes the primary focus.
This is what subjectivity means.
When this occurs words cease to connect to the phenomenon, as I stated elsewhere, and the mind is increasingly focused inwards, noumenon connecting to noumenon, where emotion usurps reason, and words can acquire any definition, be given any place in a sentence describing a concept, because the world, the cosmos no longer applies, and no longer forces the mind to correct itself.


The esoteric reading of signs and words takes over from their exoteric application.
All becomes subtext, filling in where there is no meaning, with sensation, innuendo, emotional appeals exploiting the organism's instincts, and unconscious intuitions.
Every word becomes mystical, clouded with ambiguity, not out of necessity but intentionally.
The motive is to discredit the external, so that the mind can be manipulated using the internal.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
Lyssa

Gender : Female Posts : 8965
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyFri Dec 04, 2015 3:48 pm

Satyr wrote:
achieve clarity unaffected by emotion, by interests.

In the Apollonian frame, that is achieved by distance away from the biological/appetitive centre.

In the Dionysian sense, that is achieved by unifying with the biological centre. The heights of passion and emotion and vibrancy can make one see things in more minute clarity than in their absence. At the heights of spiritual intoxication, one is able to penetrate through the veils of reality and behold a sharper vision. Why N. says lovers in passion are able to envision a world in all its richness, because one stakes everything and experiences with the totality of oneself. Passion raises them to a height. Senses become sharper, everything is more livelier, they become life themselves. Love lends a loftiness to the soul and an elevation to the spirit. Why love or the beloved is regarded as conferring a grace. This kind of perception is the opposite of subjective solipsism and the decadence of J.-Xt. and other religious mysticism, where the animal is equated to emotion than strength of spirit.

Needless to say, both frames ideally depending on the strength of the sensual apparatus among other factors.

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyFri Dec 04, 2015 4:00 pm

I consider the experiencing, other than the understanding.
An animal, a hedonist, experiences without understanding.
Why I stated that first-hand experiences are more profound than second-hand ones.

i do not deny the animal, the subjective, the Dionysian....I revel in it. I analyze and understand it, in hindsight, from a cool distance of time and space...even while it is occurring, if that level of detachment is possible, as it was for Hannibal Lecter.

The body speaks the honest truth, even when the mind believes otherwise.
One feels the pussy wet, and does not simply accept her claims that she is aroused.

The act is far more important than the word, because it is automatic, instinctive, not controlled.

Agape must take eros into account when forming itself.
Agape and eros as actions, not words.

The Apollonian does not deny Dionysian.
The Hellenic ascetic does not deny earthly pleasures; he does not reject, go into the desert where he cannot be tempted, to preserve the illusion of purity.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
Lyssa

Gender : Female Posts : 8965
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyFri Dec 04, 2015 4:09 pm

The Apollonian sees and can only see the Dionysian as pleasure, because to him, nature appears to him as the emotional animaline.

The Dionysian to the dionysian means joy [consciousness of victory founded on max. fitness - *ar, h'ar'monie - best joint, excellence, skill], because to him, nature is the intelligent animaline. The animal that communicates.

I only believe in agaperos.

In simply accepting a woman saying she is aroused actually then makes her pussy wet.
The Dionysian takes joy in creating her of his own will and trust [in himself], than accepting some ready-ma(d)te.
The Apollonian needs con-firmation from the other, which can make a wet pussy go dry.

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyFri Dec 04, 2015 4:14 pm

No, Dionysian, for me, is not pleasure, it is the satiation of need/suffering, where need/suffering precedes pleasure, and so is the first cause.
Apollonian contact with Dionysian suffering, or chaos, or animalism, is not pleasing.
It is appreciative.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν


Last edited by Satyr on Fri Dec 04, 2015 4:23 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Lyssa
Har Har Harr
Lyssa

Gender : Female Posts : 8965
Join date : 2012-03-01
Location : The Cockpit

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyFri Dec 04, 2015 4:16 pm

Its not what I said.

I said to the Apollonian, the Dionysian paradigm is one of pleasure.

_________________
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"ἐδιζησάμην ἐμεωυτόν." [Heraclitus]

"All that exists is just and unjust and equally justified in both." [Aeschylus, Prometheus]

"The history of everyday is constituted by our habits. ... How have you lived today?" [N.]

*Become clean, my friends.*
Back to top Go down
http://ow.ly/RLQvm
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyFri Dec 04, 2015 4:18 pm

And I said, no it isn't...it is primarily suffering, with the promise of pleasure.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Satyr
Daemon
Satyr

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 36827
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 58
Location : Hyperborea

Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 EmptyFri Dec 04, 2015 4:23 pm

I edited.

_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
http://satyr-s-sanatorium.forumotion.com/
Sponsored content




Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty
PostSubject: Re: Objective <> Subjective Objective <> Subjective - Page 4 Empty

Back to top Go down
 
Objective <> Subjective
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 4 of 16Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10 ... 16  Next

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: