According to the South African Department of Art and Culture:
In ceremonies that lasted about three days, izinyanga zempi, specialist war doctors, prepared izinteleze medicines which made warriors invincible in the face of their opponents.
Also, it is important to note that a middle-age European army of the same size could have taken out the Boers, as well as the Zulu.
The only reason niggers are any threat at all is that Europeans (foolishly) give them European invented and produced technology, resources, and knowledge.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37199 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
The reason intelligence is such a hot-button issue, triggering degenerates the world over, and causing delicate flowers to weep, is because intelligence is the defining trait of the human species.
Not speed, not strength, not constitution, not reproductive prowess, not size, big penises included, not altruism, not social cohesion and cooperation....in all these areas there are species that put the human one to shame.
The defining collective of traits, we call intelligence, is what has permitted the species called man, to dominate all these other species, and one another. But intelligence is a double edged sword. Too little, and you are a retard, too much relative to the challenges in the environment and the organism is prone to depression, self-doubt, questioning itself and its own existence, ennui and so on. A mind released from its original role, its creative outlet, must find alternatives in entertainment, in excess, in art, in science, or it must quiet itself, by numbing, using chemicals, alcohol, religion; it it turns on itself, self-hating, self-doubting, inflating itself to overcome itself, using hyperbole to cope with boredom, with sheltering regimentation.
This leads to atrophying.
Specialization and access to collective data, is how the illusion of parity is maintained, and the idea of progressing upwards, is cultivated. The release of the brain's energies from matters of basic survival, to be focused on a specific discipline, may offer an increase in applied intelligence, at the cost of all other areas. Access to collective knowledge, and practices that efficiently and effectively deal with problems, gives the impression of a uniformity of intelligence. The regimentation, and control of manmade environments, using technologies, policing, time consuming lifestyles, restricts the unforeseen from affecting the individual, or form testing him. All is maintained on a manageable middle-ground, where the average are just as effective, and content, as the above average, and the below average are protected and aided.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37199 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Sam Dickson talks about this: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] I'm quite excited that there's an example in European history of a king demonstrating for everyone the way to deal with flatterers. Part of the problem of whites today is they are flattered into believing they're capable of tolerating their own genocide and if they are ever wise enough to say they cannot, they are berated with accusations of 'weakness'. I wrote a post on it here: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37199 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
The naivete of Marxism continues to produce these failures. Convinced that the only reason blacks were subordinate to whites, was because whites were 'evil' and that the solution would be to free the blacks, and create an egalitarian utopia, they drove Europeans from power and reduced South Africa to a copy of every other sub-Saharan nation.
Kind of like Liberia was supposed to prove that ex-slaves from the US would flourish once they took their fate into their won hands. Taylor advocates a separate European and African America...but those in power know this would be a disaster for Negroes. They would collapse. The only thing they can do is perform as actors, entertainers and athletes, the only way any one of them can become wealthy. The separation also does not serve the Nihilistic goal of uniformity. There would be no race mixing diluting European genes to manufacture mediocrity. The War like no Other would fail.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37199 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
When it comes to race realism, race realists have one assertion: it involves group genetics.
The other has a hierarchy of diverse environmental factors down which they increasingly try to assert as THE control variables that will suddenly refute the evolutionary hereditary argument. As each fails, they go to increasingly implausible explanations until they arrive at one which is currently untested or is so expensive to test or so vague as a test that any sort of attempt ever coming to fruition would be a miracle since the community at large is disinterested in its pursuit.
Instead of saying that there is a hierarchy of plausibility, they say they are just refining possible hypotheses. So, instead of economic impacts being more plausible than cultural impacts, they say that economic impacts as an explanation just ceased being an option, or that it was still economic due to the less plausible reason.
The final argument I have heard from a race denier, after informing them of twin studies, adoption studies, economic distribution of IQ among race studies, racially homogeneous communities study (with equal funding) and presenting them with the lesser discussed fact of East Asian general IQ being on average higher than Caucasian IQ; they say that it is 'family culture'. The adoption studies apparently aren't enough to falsify it for them. Meanwhile, after having run through the gamut of their imaginations for a non-genetic reason, they claim that their position is the simplest explanation. That it is 'simplest' is refuted by it their hierarchy of probability which they attempt to explain away as 'refinement'.
Maybe I'm wrong on this, but on this dirty Earth it seems the more refined something is, the more complex its formulation because the more not-it had to be either stripped away or reconciled.
Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
Hypotheses of Indo-European origins in light of the new genetic data presented in this paper Genetic data is a valuable source of information that is useful for evaluating competing hypotheses of Indo-European language dispersals, to the extent that theories of such dispersals invoke migratory movements to explain their extensive distribution. Such hypotheses can be tested both with archaeology (which tests for the spread of material culture, which can spread not only by migration but also through trade or an exchange of ideas), and with genetics (which can test directly whether the movement of people accompanied perceived changes in the material record). Past genetic data from ancient DNA has confirmed one of the major predictions of the Anatolian hypothesis – the migration of early farmers from the Near East (inclusive of Anatolia) to Europe – using both mitochondrial DNA22-24 and whole genome analysis25,26. The results of our study are consistent with these findings, and also extend them by showing that not only the early farmers of central Europe (Germany and Hungary) and Scandinavia, but also of Iberia were descended from a common stock. In this sense, ancient DNA is consistent with migrations following the predictions of the Anatolian hypothesis, and indeed our ancient DNA results match the scenario outlined by Bellwood for the initial dispersal of farming into Europe remarkably well27. This is also true for the Balkan hypothesis, as geographically, southeastern Europe is a plausible place where early farmers could have diverged into an inland Danubian route toward central Europe, and a Mediterranean route toward Iberia. The evidence of a relatively homogeneous population of early European farmers with substantial Near Eastern ancestry25 is indeed a reasonable candidate for the spread of a single language family across Europe. 135 not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 10, 2015; doi: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] The copyright holder for this preprint (which was Our new genetic data are important in showing that a second major migration from the steppe into Europe occurred at the end of the Neolithic period (between 5000-4500 years ago). Moreover, we have demonstrated that these migrants accounted for at least ~3/4 of the ancestry of the Corded Ware people of Germany, and much of the ancestry of other Late Neolithic / Bronze Age populations of Germany and present-day northern Europeans (Fig. 3, SI9, SI10). Thus, the main argument in favor of the Anatolian hypothesis (that major language change requires major migration) can now also be applied to the Steppe hypothesis. While we cannot go back in time to learn what languages the migrants spoke, it seems more likely than not that the Corded Ware people we sampled spoke the languages of the people who contributed the great majority of their ancestry (Yamnaya), rather than the local languages of the people who preceded them. Thus, our results increase the plausibility that the Corded Ware people and those genetically similar groups who followed them in central Europe spoke a steppe-derived Indo-European language. More generally, our results level the playing field between the two leading hypotheses of Indo-European origins, as we now know that both the Early Neolithic and the Late Neolithic were associated with major migrations. While our results do not settle the debate about the location of the proto-Indo European homeland, they increase the plausibility of some hypotheses and decrease the plausibility of others as follows: 1. The Steppe hypothesis gains in plausibility by our discovery of a migration during the Late Neolithic from the steppe into central Europe. This migration was predicted by some proponents of the Steppe hypothesis and we have now shown (definitively) that it occurred. We also note that our results help to differentiate between variants of the steppe hypothesis: we do not find evidence of an influence of steppe migrants earlier than the Corded Ware, although we cannot rule out the possibility that such evidence might be found with larger sample sizes and more sampling locations in central Europe. However, we can definitely reject that the breakup of Indo-European occurred as late as 4000 years ago28, as by ~4500 years ago the migration into Europe had already taken place. Moreover, this migration clearly resulted in a large population turnover, meaning that the Steppe hypothesis does not require elite dominance9 to have transmitted Indo-European languages into Europe. Instead, our results show that the languages could have been introduced simply by strength of numbers: via major migration in which both sexes participated (SI2, SI4) 2. The Anatolian hypothesis becomes less plausible as an explanation for the origin of all IndoEuropean languages in Europe, as it can no longer claim to correspond to the only major population transformation in European prehistory, and it must also account for the language of the steppe migrants. However, the Anatolian hypothesis cannot be ruled out entirely by our data, as it is possible that it still accounts for some of the major branches of the IndoEuropean language family in Europe, especially the branches of the south where the proportion of steppe ancestry today is smaller than in central and northern Europe (Figure 3). 3. The Balkan hypothesis faces similar difficulties as the Anatolian. If the early farmers of southeastern Europe were genetically similar to their descendants in central and western Europe, a spread of Indo-European speaking migrants from the Balkans to the rest of Europe would simply introduce another layer of “Early Neolithic” genes similar to those present elsewhere in Europe, but would not account for the migration from the steppe and its associated language. Furthermore if the steppe immigrants spoke Indo-European languages, these languages are unlikely to have been acquired by migration from Europe, as our 136 not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 10, 2015; doi: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] The copyright holder for this preprint (which was Yamnaya samples show no sign of a major component of ancestry derived from European Early or Middle Neolithic farmers (Fig. 2). 4. The Armenian plateau hypothesis gains in plausibility by the fact that we have discovered evidence of admixture in the ancestry of Yamnaya steppe pastoralists, including gene flow from a population of Near Eastern ancestry for which Armenians today appear to be a reasonable surrogate (SI4, SI7, SI9). However, the question of what languages were spoken by the “Eastern European hunter-gatherers” and the southern, Armenian-like, ancestral population remains open. Examining ancient DNA from the Caucasus and Near East may be able to provide further insight about the dynamics of the interaction between these regions and the steppe. Our results show that southern populations diluted the ancestry of populations from the steppe, but also that ancestry related to Ancient North Eurasians forms a major ancestral component of the populations of the present-day Caucasus25. Thus, both south-north and north-south genetic influence across the Caucasus is plausible.
picture of competing theories for Aryan origin [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
cultural influence o' yamna 4000-2300 BC [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.] [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Quote :
People[edit] According to Jones et al. (2015) and Haak et al. (2015), autosomic tests indicate that the Yamnaya-people were the result of admixture between two different hunter-gatherer populations: distinctive "Eastern European hunter-gatherers" with high affinity to the Mal'ta-Buret' culture or other, closely related people from Siberia[2] and a population of "Caucasus hunter-gatherers" who probably arrived from somewhere in the Near East, probably the Caucasus.[3][web 1] Each of those two populations contributed about half the Yamnaya DNA.[5][web 1] According to co-author Dr. Andrea Manica of the University of Cambridge:
The question of where the Yamnaya come from has been something of a mystery up to now [...] we can now answer that, as we've found that their genetic make-up is a mix of Eastern European hunter-gatherers and a population from this pocket of Caucasus hunter-gatherers who weathered much of the last Ice Age in apparent isolation.[web 1]
Three genetic studies in 2015 gave support to the Kurgan theory of Marija Gimbutas regarding the Indo-European Urheimat. According to those studies, haplogroups R1b and R1a, now the most common in Europe and R1a also common in South Asia would have expanded from the pontic-caspian steppes, along with the Indo European languages; they also detected an autosomal component present in modern Europeans which was not present in Neolithic Europeans, which would have been introduced with paternal lineages R1b and R1a, as well as Indo European Languages in Bronze age.[16][17][18]
Nice....except for the fact that Jews are matrilineal. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
We may say that the Semites, being Indo-European were originally patrilineal, and then became matrilineal, when they adopted Judaism to overcome their slavish inheritance and to reassert their identity as belonging to the king of kings. A mono-god is the only father permitted so all males become surrogate females, raising the alpha's offspring, begotten by the female from the MALE God. Lineage is also ideological, in their case, because Jews are not a race, but an idea(l): those chosen to suffer on behalf of god, until Armageddon. Circumcision must have serve a practical purpose, to avert infections in a low water environment, and to symbolically separate themselves from all other tribe by ceremonially castrating males shortly after birth. We see this in the traditional clothing of Orthodox Jews....they seem so strange, intentionally signalling their distinctiveness as the 'chosen'.
We, also,see this tradition passed on into Christianity with the Biblical tale of holy inception. Jacob was essentially a cuckold, of the mind. Patrilineality had to be preserved in tribes that could not go to the extreme to signal their mental castrations. The current liberation of females is the outcome of this loss of patrilineal lines. The females belong to the State, and the children belong to the state, and are under the parent's care....mostly the mothers. the father is a sperm donor and then must become a surrogate mother. His rights over the child are minimal. They do not actually belong to him, and his traditions. The state is cultivating them, educating them to become idea(l) citizens for the State.
Jesus was technically still a Jew because his mother was so, even though his father was not. He chose to bridge the Hellenic and Judaic bloodlines, and this got him killed. You cannot mix such contrary world-views. One loves life and nature, and the other hates it. One believes in many gods representing natural forces, and the other believes in a singularity that contradicts the multiplicity of nature. Judaism must have adopted matrilineal inheritance to signify their separation from thir Semitic paganism. Like with Christianity they must have preserved some of their traditions but corrupted them, connecting themselves to a past they wanted to reject in words/symbols only. Christians did the same....converting the gods and heroes to saints and apostles, the rituals they corrupted into Christianity, changing the names so as to forget their origins.
The reason why Christians did not want to totally forget their past is because their past was a glorious one. Wars had to be fought to make them forget. Pagans had to be slaughtered, names of children made illegal, churches built over ancient [pagan temples and so on...all to make the pagans forget their past. this was no so for the Jews. they wanted to disappear into the host they found themselves among. Changed their names, married into their bloodlines to become immersed, except for the very religious and still true to the original teaching of Judaism that despised life, nature and the world, and wanted to end it....and still does. In this case the desire is to forget...to adopt the outer appearances, follow the traditions of the host. There is also a political movement that wants to return to a Semitic tribal identity - Zionism.But it does not let go of its Jewish more recent past. The entire history of their 'suffering' because this is the only identity they now have, after so many thousands of years. The identity of 'victim' is too ingrained. Secular Jews, humanists, Marxists, want to destroy all tribes so as to forget their own.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37199 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Just as we classify animals and plants of the same species into different groupings, we can classify humans according to racial criteria. It should be noted that Coon does not rank the races but merely draws attention to the fascinating variety of human groupings in the planet with different racial traits. In this manner, Coon's system is the best suited to this chapter's objective, identifying the movements of the European peoples throughout the development of Western culture. According to Coon, there are three main sub-species of races (Caucasoid, Mongoloid and Congoloid), with four more races identified. He also draws further divisions within each of these main racial types to take account of important additional morphological differences, geographic variations, and the ways in which different environments engendered cultures which 'profoundly' affected the character of the races. The following succinct statement by Cocoon is worth quoting:
'A race is a major segment of a species originally occupying, since first dispersal of mankind, a large, geographical unified, and distinct region, and touching on the territories of other races only by narrow corridors. Within such a region each race acquired its distinctive genetic attributes - both in visible appearance and its invisible biological properties - through the selective forces of all aspects of the environment, including culture. After having become differentiated in this fashion, each race filled out its space, resisting, because of its superior adaptation, the entrenchment of outsiders with whom it mixed, from time to time if not continuously, along its borders.
Hart, Wade, Cochran and Harpending offer an up-to-date scientific definition. Hart is the most succinct in pointing out that races are 'not unique to the human species', since many animal species consist of more than one type, though these types are called subspecies, or breeds rather than races. This is his definition:
'A race...might be defined as a large group of individuals - all of them members of the same species - who have formed a partial or completely isolated breeding population, for a significant peiod of time, and who consequently differ statistically from the rest of the species in various heritable traits by which they can be recognized.
Hart emphasizes geographic isolation as the major factor that caused humans to be differentiated into races. Breeding populations that are geographically separated for a long time will experience an accumulation of genetic differences between them, both by natural selection and by genetic drift. It has been imperative for those that believe that races are a social construct to insist that humans have been interacting and amalgamating since since they evolved into Homo sapiens, for they know that the theory of natural selection cannot support the existence of races if human populations across the earth were isolated for thousands of years. This is down to a simple fact that a human population will experience different selective pressures in different environments. In turn, this will result in the evolution of distinct genetic traits, which is itself the basis of the argument for different races. As Wade observes:
'The ancestral human population of 50,000 years ago differed greatly from the anatomically modern of 100,000 years ago [...]After the dispersal of the ancestral population from Africa 50,000 years ago, human evolution continued independently in each continent. the population of the world's major geographic regions bred from many thousands years in substantial isolation from each other and started to develop distinctive features, a genetic differentiation that is the basis for today's races.
By 'ancestral Wade means the humans of the Upper Palaeolithic who evolved in Africa and then began 50,000 years ago to spread into every continent. Hart believes that four principle races evolved in the major continents: Mongoloids, Negroids, Australoids and Caucasoids. He divides the first two races into the following sub-races: 1)Mongoloid: Amerian Indians and Asian mongoloids. ii) Negroids: Negroes, Congoid Pygmies and Khoisan. He adds that there are also major population groupings which are admixtures of the principle races, that many of us today are hybrids and that within each of these races and sub-races one finds multiple ethnic groups classified according to a whole host of cultural markers. hart neatly sums up some of the key physical differences observed between the races under the following categories: ' surface differences' (skin colour, hair colour, shape of nose and lips, shape of eyelids); 'existence and susceptibility to various diseases' (sickle-cell anemia, measles, malaria); 'rate of physical maturation' (age at which children can turn over, crawl, and walk); 'reproductive' (age at menarche, gestation period); 'body build' (height, stockiness, width of hips, lung capacity, fractions of quick-twitch muscle). hart also addresses 'behavioural differences' in studies of contemporary racial groups in terms of aggressiveness, impassivity, divorce rates and finally differences between races in r-K survival strategies. The latter are related to the interval times between births, offspring per female, parental care, onset of sexual activity, and infant mortality rates. However, as I indicated above, the main focus of Hart's book is on racial differences in intelligence and the role these differences played in the cultural development of different civilizations. ---Faustian Man In a Multicultural Age
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
Excerpt from a longer video I already posted here, but evidence of Africans and Non-Africans being different genetically when compared to other species like Neanderthal.
For some reason I had got the idea that there was no Neanderthal admixture event. It appears, though, that there still might be, but just that that particular idea about admixture being responsible for the differences between Africans and Non-Africans is not correct since Denisovans exist. Story isn't complete.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37199 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
What concerns Conrad, however, is the promotion of a history in which the diverse cultures of the world can be seen as equal participants in the making of the Enlightenment. Conrad wants to carry to its logical conclusions the allegedly 'universal' ideals of the Enlightenment, hoping to persuade Westerners that the equality and the brotherhood of mankind require the promotion of a Global Enlightenment. But Conrad blunders right from the start when he references Toby Huff's book, Intellectual Curiosity and the Scientific Revolution, as an example of the 'no longer tenable' 'standard reading' of the Enlightenment. First, this book is about the uniquely 'modern scientific mentality' witnessed in 17th century Europe, not about the 18th century Enlightenment. It is also a study written, as the subtitle says, from a 'Global Perspective'. Rather than brushing off this book in one sentence, Conrad should have addressed its main argument, published in 2010 and based on the latest research, showing that European efforts to encourage interest in the telescope in China, the Ottoman Empire, and Mughal India 'did not bear much fruit'. "The telescope that set Europeans on fire with enthusiasm and curiosity, failed to ignite the same spark elsewhere. That led to a great divergence that was to last all the way to the end of the 20th century". ---Fustian Man in a Multicultural Age
This brings up an interesting fact about the races and why Europeans still dominate in all fields. Asians are numerically superior and have higher, on average IQ's, so why are they not on the forefront of philosophical and scientific ground-breaking thought....at least not until some are integrated within European thinking? Why do they still lag behind, only adopting European innovations and mass producing them, cheaper? Why did the Jews create no lasting great works of art...not until some became influenced by European thinking, and then they only managed to produce second-rate imitations?
The secret is in the daemon. A balance between mind/body, produced by European history - populations brought to the edge of extinction by a harsh environment. Asians are passive...something their spirituality nurtures. Buddhist asceticism is not the same as Hellenic, Doric, asceticism. Science is the challenging of natural order....philosophy is the confrontational of the real with an ideal, where the idea(l) does not usurp the real, but the idea(l) is sharpened by the repeated friction. Jews, on the other hand, identify with being victims. Art, innovation, requires the courageous confrontation of the real, not the construction of internal alternate realities where up is down and down is up. They run inward rather than outward.
What is missing is 'spirit'. The desire to face the world, as it is, and self within it, with no inflation/deflation.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37199 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
race mixing is unnatural, argument against it not being unnatural:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] "Before the start of the experiment the males showed no significant differences in mating success. But after the large differences in tail length were artificially created, great differentials appeared in the number of new active nests in each territory. The males whose tails were lengthened acquired the most new mates (as indicated by new nests), outnumbering those of both of the controls and the males whose tails were shortened. The latter had the smallest number of new active nests. The females, therefore, preferred to mate with the males having the longest tails."
If there are objectively more attractive physical characteristics, it would be moronic to presume they are not more present in one race over another.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] A beauty contest was judged by AI and the robots didn't like dark skin The first international beauty contest decided by an algorithm has sparked controversy after the results revealed one glaring factor linking the winners
Overwhelmingly women preferred their own race, but whites are objectively more beautiful than others, when race "isn't a consideration". The ability to disregard race is not indicative of the complete irrelevance of it. In general, the idea that racial/subspecies physical characterstics are irrelevant to sexual selection is a testable hypothesis, with at least some cursory research already done in the first link I posted.(edited) Whether race is a better predictor of reproductive success with different racial collectives of females, is also a testable hypothesis - if you want to see whether money, height, or race is the most decisive factor, or which ones are more important than others. Condemnation of it to irrelevance is premature at best.
if it can be shown (as an example for a study) tigers and lions, forced together, choose to mate with their own kind over the different kind - and they are capable of fertile reproduction - then there is natural evidence for racial or subspecies preference in sexual selection and the choosing of different subspecies for reproduction is unnatural. in other words, degenerate, because it is a project of desperation or Lowest Common Denominator mate selection.
if a natural preference is demonstrated, going against the preference when racial similars are available, shows it is an unnatural choice.
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37199 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Complex systems created by complex minds cannot be maintained by minds that adopted, or inherited them, or stole them, and had no hand in creating them. Multiculturalism leads to decline....it is a symptom of decadence. The final phase of a culture/civilization.
A meme, a culture a language, can be taught to a population that did not invent it, but it cannot be applied nor appreciated the same. An example would be how the Romans, though genetic relatives of the Greeks, adopted their culture and language but slightly corrupted it. Imagine what a people who are not genetically related to the Greeks have done to it, or can do to it. A meme is a manifestation of the relationship between a people, genetics, and the environment. People and environment are in an intimate interaction. The specific qualities of the environment will force the population to adapt, adjust, to it in very specific ways.
Genes birth memes...and world is the factor that determines the kind of meme will be produced by the particular kind of gene because the gene is a product of world, and meme is the extension of this gene. You cannot become a Hellene by visiting Greece, eating Greek food, listening to Greek music, or even by learning the language. You might imitate it, or adopt it as your own, but you can never embody the historical events that produced it...no more than a Greek can become Japanese by visiting the environment, the country and learning Japanese, or dressing Japanese adopting the Japanese lifestyle.
Gene Meme relationship is that of mother and child. A child can adopt or can be adopted by a non biological mother, but he will never be what a biological child would be for her.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
We are not born as clean slates (tabula rasa) because that would automatically discredit all biological categories and not only the ones liberals want to ignore and blame on some conspiracy, they call at times god, and at other times state and more recently they call with the term 'society'.
DNA is the inheritance of memories. These memories establish upper limits in the development of all biological traits - physical and mental. At the same time an organism is born open-ended - open to the world. Its brain is full of neurological connections that gradually reduce. This openness is its inherited potentials confronting and being confronted by world. Subject (identity - past) awakening to Object (world). This is what Dasein means. Past returned into world....because if no reproduction takes place these inherited memories are lost.
Young organism have this curiosity meant to develop their brains, because environments is changing, is change, that needs no fanatics to promote it....it happens whether we, as living organism like it or not. Environment, existence, is flux - in other words change - therefore the organism's inherited memories have to be constantly reaffirmed against the real, to validate. This is why consciousness is constant, and why ideas are not absolute but evaluated on their precedent, including both personal and inherited precedent. DNA is inherited precedent.
We never establish absolute certainty, but we establish the most probable - the highest, best, most possible. This is why the Abrahamic singularity God, is absurd, and exposes a motive lacking integrity. Some ideas, theories, have such a high probability that they are understood as being certain, by the layman who cares not for theories and for complicated evaluations of existence. For example.....that no Absolute has ever been found outside verbal statements and mental abstraction, makes it highly improbable....and contrary to what is found. It is a contradiction to what is experienced as multiplicity, fluidity, change. Nothing immutable, whole has ever been experienced - zero precedent. No 'one', no singularity, nothing complete has ever been experienced. The idea is theoretical and can be explained by well-intended minds. In fact, I've provided my own explanation as to why the noumenon becomes a abstraction believed in literally - the relationship of subjective to objective. Dismissing my explanation without offering another, better one, on the grounds that it is not whole, complete, perfect, already assumes what is absent, and sues it as an excuse.
In philosophy the natural method of 'survival of the fittest' applies. A theory is discredited by another better one - a superior one - and not on the grounds that it is also imperfect. A lion hunts and kills a gazelle on the ground that it is superior, and not that it is perfect. The weak member of a herd is culled not because other members are perfect, or immortal, but because they are superior in the organic sense - in the sense of what traits the particular species evolved as a specialized method of surviving. Each species is a reproductive category that also evolves a common method of surviving - specialization. Each specialized method has its own traits, that evolve in relation to environment. What makes one member of a species superior to another is based on fitness within world, within environment.....and this means in regards to the particular traits the species is characterized by, in regards to its specialized method of survival - traits manifest as appearance. DNA expressed as presence. Lions have their own, represented by their appearance. Gazelles have their own. Humans have their own.
Race is a sub-category of species. It is the process of evolution that has not resulted in DNA splintering - inherited past, memories, taking their own distinct path within environment.
A trait is evaluated not noetically, theoretically, but pragmatically - trait within world. Organism in relation to world. Subject in relation to Object. Pragmatically - not noetically but ideas converted to actions. Idea(l) in relation to the Real.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37199 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
Jared Taylor is calling out Liberal Americans....he knows they are lying and he is putting them to a test. they say they do not believe in racial differences being genetic, so Jared wants to put this to the test and separate the races. The hypocrite twats know that any where the Negroes are placed they will destroy it, and then liberal twats would have nobody to blame to hide their hypocrisy and lies. It's happened in Liberia, it is happening in South Africa, and in Detroit. They know, but they will not admit it. instead they want Europeans to pick up the slack, and inter-breed to eliminate this fact....so they would rather destroy the superior than admit there is an inferior.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
Anfang
Gender : Posts : 3989 Join date : 2013-01-23 Age : 40 Location : Castra Alpine Grug
One reason why promoting negroes is popular among shitlibs and cuckservatives is because it speaks to their sensibilities of promoting that which they feel superior to. Slave morality in terms of racial social politics.
It's a natural sentiment for them and only when the negro start to become an unavoidable problem for them because they can't afford to escape, only then will this discomfort outweigh their natural disposition towards promoting what they feel superior to.
Last edited by Anfang on Mon Mar 05, 2018 7:14 pm; edited 1 time in total
apaosha Daeva
Gender : Posts : 1850 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 37 Location : Ireland
_________________ "I do not exhort you to work but to battle; I do not exhort you to peace but to victory. May your work be a battle; may your peace be a victory." -TSZ
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37199 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
