Liberal/Conservative: Left/Right and American Politics

Libs are racist.

Libs are the most extreme racists on the planet. Its all about blacks. Libs dont love me or care about me. They love blacks over me. Interracials like me dont get any love from the libs, all libs do is love black people.

Libs hate Asians. Liberals are super racist of Asians.

You know why?

Libs hate intelligence. They have this subconscious hatred of people who have big brains.

I go on Facebook. All I see are libs and trannie crossdressers who say on their profile, only blacks allowed.

It is so racist. Everyone loves blacks but not me.

Im sick of the liberal hypocrasy.

Obama adminstration, deports 3 million immigrants and locks children in cages. But noone says or does anything about it. Instead, the blame goes on Trump, a white man, for Obama's crimes.

Obama is a black man. Obama is black.If you are black, the liberals automatically praise you for whatever you do, no matter how evil. He is interracial but he is a black interracial, he looks black.

If a rap person talks about raping women, mysogyny, and saying the n-word over and over, they get thunderous applause and 5 million dollars.

But if an interracial, who looks pale as a ghost, says the n-word, or posts something somewhat mysogynist, then everyone loses their minds.

It is this liberal hatred of anyone who isn't black. This liberal hatred of mixed people and asians.

I am interracial, half-black half-white. But i am white. I do not look anything like Obama. I look like an asian person, I am almost as pale as a ghost. That is why liberals hate me. Because they hate asians.

Obama discriminates against asians, keeps them out of college, and the liberals give him thunderous applause.

Trump tries to save asians, encourage asians in america, and gets called a racist. Trump reduces black unemployment, gets called an enemy of black people.

Hillary calls Jews kikes, Kisses the leader of the KKK, and gets thunderous applause of liberals.

The liberals have the most broken and illogical and delusional kind of thinking patterns ever.

I am the least racist person on the planet. Im saying we need more immigrants. Japanese immigrants. We need more Japanese people here in order to save americans from dumb redneck religious people. And with the strength of the japanese we will make a glorious technological paradise.

Communists have a monopoly on hate in every major cultural public platform. Zio-Bolshevik 'conservatives' follow their Communist institutional leaders: hate flows freely rightward, reserving only mockery for those left of them - with rare interactions of the sort with 'SJWs' who are mostly defamed and nestled behind their 'moderate' defenders by choice and complaint to authority (that they claim 'oppresses' them). With infuriatingly dogmatic anti-fascist boomer posting, these retarded and uneducated (about the huge Communist problem in academia) anachronisms keep the youth meekly pulled to the 'center', where there resides a mere status quo that, when looking back from today, has only enabled the further degeneration of everything the so-called 'conservative' (really moderate Trotskyite Communists) presume themselves to preserve.

So Leftists actually hate racial diversity because it proves the viability of civic nationalism.

You've outdone yourself with this argument, Paul. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Richard Spencer (@RichardBSpencer) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Unironically so.

— Richard Spencer (@RichardBSpencer) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The civ-cuck is the true believer.

Judenprio is Jewsgusting, like a butcher beefing his pigs up for slaughter and farmer impregnating cows continuously over and over to milk them whilst they lay there heavy and defenseless; only that the butcher doesn't lay with the pigs in a pink-piggy costumer and chronk at them telling them to go fuck the farmers children nor does he have a choice of simply abandoning his slaughterhouse and living off land without animals. At this point, when Jews have exposed themselves so bluntly and boldly due to their position within America, anybody who fights off anti-Semitism as some prejudice and coockoorery shall not be taken seriously at all.

How to reduce the internet mob problem:
Step 1: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] does NOT fire [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Step 2: We all agree that, from now on, no organization shall fire anyone if a mob is demanding the firing, especially if it's because of... tweets.

Social media messes with our moral matrices.

— Jonathan Haidt (@JonHaidt) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

We (I'm talking to you, right-wing outrage mob) all agree to cuck everytime.

It's not really the outrage mob that gets anybody fired. It's those people in charge who listen to certain outrage mobs, namely those which they agree with ideologically. Imagine certain outrage mobs getting ignored every time, they would quickly disappear, becoming demoralised.

Meanwhile we can tell those "conservatives" that it was all just about the bottomline, the money, as to why those executives fired somebody. See, it was just the universal truth of money and as we all know money is this rocksolid standard where if a company or somebody does good stuff he gets rewarded and if he does bad stuff he doesn't get bailed out. Neither is the flow of low-interest credit ideologically motivated. What insane person would do such a thing as to devalue the sacred US dollar and use it as a tool? Might as well devalue the people of the nation while they are at it.

This is why conservatives have lost. They've legitimised the left's moral declaratives instead of transvaluating them. Political denouncement of racism & fascism isn't moral but a soft-imperialist, anti-white power play subverted by moral language used to crush the right. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— (@TrueDilTom) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The eternal cuck is very adept at infiltration, much better than the shitlib.
The shitlib sees you as "the other" morally. The eternal cuck claims to be like you morally as he subverts your morality.

Rights are social constructs promoting all-inclusion.

"Atheists haven't solved the problem of ethics" says Molyneux.
Perhaps only in the minds of the cowardly and still infected with Abrahamic nihilism.
They ought to speak with me....I'll solve it for them.
Not in the absolutist way they would like to ensure reliability and preserve their own comforting certainty, but all is fluid.
Nature only knows of superior/inferior, what is successful and what fails. Ethics/Morality is based on this fact, mystified and sanctified to make it effective among the degenerates and the feeble-minded majorities that make the social system run.

Fucking your parents, or having sex with a child is not immoral because some mind declared it so, or God said so....it is so because of the function of sex and the product of genetic consequences.
But sexual dysfunction does occur, as homosexuality and transsexualism and bestiality proves.
Society, the collective, decides if it will intervene to adjust the cost/benefits, or if it will step in, or step aside and allow nature to takes its toll.

I disagree. My stance is a moral one.

Because the point of genetics is about better quality of life. If quality of life, does not matter, then what does good genetics matter? The point of good genes is to have better quality of life. Otherwise, why not be content to be mold and amoebas.

Thus, pedophilia is morally wrong, because it traumatizes children. Pedophilia is non-reproductive, and thus has no effect on genes.

It is also important to seperate the difference between homosexuals and bisexuals. If a bisexual gets a nut off by fucking another, effiminate male, because they are rejected by a woman. Vs. homosexuals who want to be zombies and have no taste in their partner.
Lusting for women is always a reflection of higher taste, at the expense of higher stress and risk.
Thus lusting for women is not in of itself "utopia", as it has higher chance of failure. Homosexuals will argue that they have a "utopia" but it is a utopia devoid of substance, a zombie utopia.

^Exactly.

When the nihilistic infection gains hold all discourse is encased in its bi-polar paradigm.
Both ends representing positive or pure nihilism, or different variants of the same ideology.

The illusion of freedom is provided by the binary choice...either/or....right/left.
Both defined in ways that agree about reality, offering a different way of dismissing and/or escaping it.
A cognitive trap, using language to encase the mind in a tomb.

When words are no longer used properly then what meaning does conservative and liberal have, if male/female are meaningless terms?
The disease corrupts the mind, first, and then the body....using semiotics.
It corrupts language rendering it meaningless, and so useless for the Zombies.
Thinking is warped.
Slavery from the inside out.

The stupidity of America's project of limited government is that they recruit their judiciary from the pool of those who directly profit from its proliferation (lawyers).

Weakness and degeneracy, hey-ho.
The Republicans had taken over the part of adopting weakness as their virtue, virtuous losers.
The Democrats had taken over degeneracy as their call.

The fundamental definition of 'extremism' is the belief of "us vs. them", where any not obedient to or belonging to one's 'side', is 'of the other side'. This extremist mindset is part and parcel of the infection of nihilism, its existing as a phenomenon being indicative of being a nihilistic strain. Thus, the 'anti-fascist' sees all who are not a part of it as its enemy.

Radicalism, some argue, is a battle against reason itself - and so, if something radical opposes you, the soft argue that it means they are really rational; but this ignores the polar nature of nihilistic opposition. Instead, the polarizing party is against only the certain elements of their opposed party that are reasonable.

Only one group in history, and one particular sort of mindset, identifies with and accuses with prefixes of 'anti-'. Even those using 'anti-white' are utilizing or appealing to the same radical mindset.

If you say anti-semitic or anti-White you are not having an argument with the other group. It's like saying Fuck off, you are my enemy, end of arguments.
What I find dishonest is when you then behave as if it was not just that, as if it was some argument in itself.

In post-modern, or feminized times, being 'hurt' and feeling 'insulted' is an argument.

Women use this same tactic. They simply start crying, or tell you how your behaviour of ideas have hurt them.
Like children.

Libertarianism is a political plantation for White people, its literally an ideology about giving up any desire for political power and then following it up with righteous whining to those that have power when they refuse to reciprocate "the favor".

— Aviz (@Aviz32224985) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

It wouldn't be that bad to live in the non-autistic libertarian "utopia".
But I also think that well-intentioned libertarians have been mislead about how and why such a state of libertarian being in society is achieved. It requires powerful men, actually having power you know, a lot of them, who work together to keep their power for themselves and their descendants.
And whining about principles or worse, allowing others to cuck you with your own principles, is not how you get that necessary power to begin with.

Slaughtz wrote:

Only one group in history, and one particular sort of mindset, identifies with and accuses with prefixes of 'anti-'. Even those using 'anti-white' are utilizing or appealing to the same radical mindset.

Also used in this is the "phobia" shaming tactic, turning a kind of distaste for any observable manifestation of entropy as a distaste in itself.



How sad to have to justify your existence with words instead of actions and results.

Leftism is entirely political, abstract.
It's ideals only apply within human environment - societies - and are completely impotent and useless - if applied dangerous - outside of them.
Their beliefs are entirely and completely noetic - theoretical, idealistic.
If and when they dare apply them universally, outside the specific culture - as with the case of those retards that were killed - or outside human environments, altogether, in natural environments.
They are completely logos, with no reference to anything outside human minds - minds that share the same semiotics.
The words trigger psychology, manipulating fears, and proposing antidotes to nature's indifference and to man's terror: idealistic narcotics.

The imbeciles Watson mentioned in the vid were individuals born and raised within sheltered memes that used multiculturalism as their uniforming unifying ideal.
They were fed idealistic lies for so long that they actually became convinced that they were universal truths.

Then, these imbeciles, existed the framework of the protection and tested their convictions outside it....resulting in natural selection - culling.
They left the meme that created an artificial reality, within which their idiocy was protected from itself, and became the 'victims' of their own stupidity.
A real life example of everything I've ever said.

To be just, the 'right' as it is defined in the west - within the same nihilistic lies the left flourishes in - is also infected with memetic bullshyte....because it is part of the same paradigm, only its binary opposite.
It feeds into the nihilistic lies so gain political power, because it is forced to seduce the same masses of imbeciles the left produces as part of its influence.
Nepotism is the disease the right suffers from - the idea that genetic status can be transferred memetically, using money, wealth. This comes in conflict with natural processes where the dominant male cannot pass-on its status to its offspring, but only the genes that produced it.
Th right also adopts the myth of monogamy as part of its stabilizing and unifying methodology, and sells it, to the average moron, as a universal moral standard....because the masses are innately brutish and need lies to self-regulate - to the degree that they can.

Many Anglo-Saxon and Jewish conservatives are ex-Trotsyites. This includes US neo-cons.
The affinity between Protestant Puritanism and Jewish Talmudic occultism, is most clear in Marxist mergers, such as Anarchy, and Trotskyism, and Stalinism etc.

Trotsky's perpetual revolution attracts those who believe in perpetual earthly suffering - heaven on earth is rotted in the idea of heaven no earth.
It connects to how I thought of Marxism, as a secular version of the same nihilism Abrahamism is based on, only they substitute Paradise, with Utopia, and instead of projecting it 'beyond space/time' they project it in the immanent future - see Spinoza as an inspiration.

Ironically for such psychotics peace among tribes would be impossible, because their nihilism depends on maintaining a constant state of stress to placate and manipulate the masses.
See, when the ideal is impractical, and inapplicable, the alternative would be an eternal movement towards it without ever attaining it, for fear of exposing it as naive and irrational.
The ideal can never be exposed as what it is because it will never be applied. The masses will live in hope of its eventual coming, and they will not complain because the reason for their own ideals imperfections will forever be that it has yet to be applied.

The pagan Greeks introduced them to the idea of life as 'war', agon...and they corrupted it to accommodate their own nihilistic dogmas.
This is what I meant when I said that Christianity was the product of Hellenism coming in contact with Judaism - eventually giving rise to Marxism - but that Judaism, as well, was impacted by Hellenism, splintering it into three distinct types:
Orthodoxy, Political Judaism (Marxism) and Cultural Judaism (Zionism).
Hellenism was selectively absorbed and corrupted, just as Christianity selectively absorbed and corrupted the Jewish dogma.

Globalism is another word for Americanism.
Americanism is Puritan Protestant and Jewish occultism, using nihilism as a political tool for controlling populations.
The US started as a ambitious experiment, inspired by Rome, but it was corrupted by Abrahamism and is now the Civilization phase of Abrahamic culture.
The last Presidents that tried to fulfil their constitutional role were JFK and Nixon, and each was dealt with using different methods.

Money - or any form of language detached from reality - is this new World Order's Messiah.
It has replaced Paradise with Utopia; the 'beyond' with 'future' (futurism or 'progressiveness); God with Absolutism, represented by oneness, or 1 to which the antagonists (enemy) is the 'nil'; Paganism replaced by Satanism and/or occultism; liberty with detachment from reality, and from noe's own past - divide and conquer, American individuality; Modern Messiah is Money, promising freedom from reality, from one's genetic limits and failings, and an earthly paradise (hedonism).  

Dumbing-Down involves the reduction of thinking to absolutes - dualities, binary code = 1/0.
Simplifying thinking to either/or absolute generalizations.
Straight out of Orwellian newspeak...1984 dystopia. By eliminating words you eliminate their conception.
In this case words are rendered meaningless nonsense by disconnecting them form their worldly references. The mind is taken away - suing language, semiotics - from all earthly considerations; it is handicapped, and mentally retarded; individuals no longer trust their own senses: what they see as being different is really all the same.

Capitalism and Marxism are both part of the same paradigm. they both believe in money, in world government, and uniform masses; they differ in methodology, and rhetoric.
One failed, the other took over.
The Soviets were created by US corporations and banks, first to defeat the Germans, and then to justify their military-industrial infrastructure, as a means of remaining a covert police state, without appearing to be so.
When the Soviets collapsed they had to find another patsy....so they used the Muslims they, also, built to attack the Soviets: they create the enemy they then use to justify why they remain militaristic and why there is no money for the masses.
Fear/Anxiety is a method of softening-up the Will, making the mind more impressionable, more malleable, less resistant.

There's the distraction and drug component, the propaganda infrastructure ('news' and entertainment = hedonism); then there's the dumbing-down (corrupting language, illiteracy); there's degeneracy promoted through the destruction of families, feminism, and technologies that reduce the consequences for debauchery; there's money and its seductive 'liberating' force, silencing voices and placating resistance; and then there's this pseudo-Democratic system - hiding a plutocracy - selling the myth of 'political choice' as another product or service.

The idea that an elite group, with wealth and power, would abandon their fate to the hands of masses of mostly imbeciles, ignoramus' and retards is an idea only the illiterate, retarded imbecile would believe.

Absolutist either/or, 1/0 is a dumbing-down, to the point where the mind become naive, gullible, unable to perceive or to acknowledge nuances - black/white perception cannot accept greys.
It begins with an over-estimation, a hyperbolic absolute catharsis of self, as the 'good' making all others potential 'evil'.

This is what Alexandianism means: the belief that omniscience is possible, and therefore omnipotence is attainable.
Not God, as the eternal 'other' one must surrender to, but man, himself, as a potential future God.
This is 'positive' Nihilism, as opposed to pure Nihilism.

What does absolute order imply?
That all is knowable.
The absent absolute awaits to be fulfilled...to be Created; man ascend to his divine thrown.
But which man?
'All men, together; a multiplicity of oneness, if we rid ourselves of our internal divisions and we strive for a shard godliness', says the Marxist, newly disillusioned by Abrahamism. 'No', says the Modern American man 'only one can only be king of the entire cosmos, the world, and we must compete until the one stands out and becomes God' - hope is always a nice ego booster.

Either/Or thinking.

Either we are all redeemed, and absolutely so, or nobody is redeemed, at all.

Leftist logic: Nationalism is absurd because you're identifying with thousands to billions of people you don't know and will never see or hear about. Which is why I am a humanist instead.

Leftists retreat to libertarian 'individualism' for their worldview, and 'family'. Some will even claim not to be 'collectivist'. They give it no further thought than that.

Dismantling the NY Times



Wait....let me look up who the owners are that hired 'that':


Aha....ahem.... ....well, it all makes sense now.
It's all a big coincidence, of course.

More coincidences ...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]