Observations and Thoughts too short for their own threads - 2

In a world against thymotic, masculine, violence - erotic violence increases in severity. This is where you find BDSM and other erotic violence under the guise of 'consent' and 'love'.

Our neighborhood favorite mutation illustrates his nostalgia for the masculine nihilism and all the gifts it has brought upon the western body....

Consensual Marriage

I see nothing wrong with a woman's choice as long as she suffers the consequences of it, consequences which Christianity mitigates and soon made irrelevant.

Education

Of course, those children with no earthly father to guide and train them must be saved by the abstraction instead of suffering the consequences of an absent father. The abstraction knows no bounds, so it will not be satisfied until the entire earth is under its dominion.

Science

Ah yes, science, used selectively now by those who wish to deny the world and who lack the conviction and courage to act upon their findings by referring back to fluidity.

Those who learn to not judge a book by its cover, from a book on not judging books by their covers.

Of course sheltering gave the opportunity for the fields of science, medicine, and weaponry to develop further, but what has that done but make us more dependent on these tools and allow those unworthy to multiply.

Separation of Church and State

Perhaps separated in theory, but in practice the two branches continued to abide by the same idea(l), the same idea(l) that allowed for "SJWs" to come about. Of course Christianity is not to blame for its excesses and influences upon the real, only man in his pursuit of it...how convenient.  

This is classic Nihilism proper, or authentic Nihilism, being confronted by positive or hypocritical Nihilism.
Masculine versus Feminine Nihilism...and what better representative than a half-breed Jew, homosexual.
On the political spectrum the Conservative versus the Liberal world-haters, belonging to the binary poles of Nihilism, the 1/0.
To annul the real world in absolute chaos, or to annul it in absolute order.

The U.S. is the "civilization" emerging out of the idealism of Nihilistic despair.
Like Rome was the end-stage of Paganism, emerging out of Hellenic culture, the U.S. is the end-stage of Abrahamic Nihilism, and its secular outgrowths.
The culture of no-culture, populated by "individuals' lacking a past, in other words detached from nature - sum of all past nurturing.
Not pragmatically, but in theory.
It oscillates in the afterglow of post-War victories over its true enemy, which died producing a monstrosity as part of its dying spasms.

America is all noumenon - abstraction, to compensate for inherited imperfections.
It's politics is encompassed within the Nihilistic paradigm of pure nihilism, Liberals, and hypocritical, "positive" Nihilists, Judeo-Christian conservatives.
Division between Church and State never took place. It morphed into a metaphor, incorporating the Abrahamic Nihilistic spirituality as part of its political spectrum.
Right wing neo-cons maintain a tenuous connection to Paganism, in ritualized form, but only within the all-encompassing salvation of a one-god, converted into monetary code - money can set you free from your past, compensate for inferior genes.
Liberals preach complete detachment from reality - a absolute immersion in noetic fantasy - subjectivity.
Even the obvious, like biological sexual roles, are denied relevance, without a hint of shame, or a sign of doubt. They can lie to you, straight to your face, and call a dog a cat, without losing a beat.

American freedom is this equality of possibilities, if you work hard, pay your dues, and earn the right to declare yourself liberated from your ancestry - the self-made man.
If you got the money, honey, they've got your disease.
Liberty in remaining adolescent - under the protective umbrella of a benevolent State, rather than the forgiving embrace of the conservative One-god, absolving all true believers, all who have love in their heart, of all natural identifiers, and all genetic limitations to their fantastic aspirations.
Why feel shame when you can buy respect, or, at least, have some fake it?

What else can be bought?
Love, friendship, genius?

When words no longer matter, they can be thrown about to cause an impact, to build an image.
Enough money will buy you yes-sayers, worshiping the round you walk upon.

To be lost is to be free.
Free to be exploited, to become assimilated, to change dress and play another part.
Lost is Modern-speak for "sinner" - an eligible lost lamb ready for salvation.
The shepherd will leave his flock to go out looking for that one lost lamb - a power display.
Ambition of the herd-er, secretly considering himself distinct from the manimals he finds esteem within.

Although every human, every animal, every fish/bird/insect, is always an 'object', all creatures attempt to distance themselves from their "objectivity" (instincts, nature, emotions) by building themselves as 'subjects'. This is a necessarily, implicit moralizing concept. A thing becomes its own Agency (Autonomy) and this is how humanity convinced itself, for thousands of years, that is is "more than" a mere object. It is through ideals, goals, rationalizations, objectification (inversion), and projection that Modern humans convince themselves that they are "Subjects" (Dignity, Honor, Pride) instead of a lower, most easily controlled animal.

For example, with Modern Feminism, women deny their "sexual objectification" and claim they are more than "sexual objects designed for the pleasure of men". Yet, within their own diagnosis, they reveal their own psychosis and motivations, and their fears. A modern woman *FEARS* her sexual objectification as a necessary conclusion of sex. Could mammals have evolved this far, humanity too, without "sexual objectification" and sexual gratification? Obviously not.

So, like most Modern liberal movements, Feminism is Nihilistic, an attempt to deny, or hide the obvious fact, that women ARE their sexuality (feminine) in a way similar that men ARE their sexuality (masculinity) as well.

And NO amount of pretending, child's play, women pretending to be men, men pretending to be women, are going to ultimately affect Nature or the "real world", objectively, in anyway.

Hetero Sex is still the same foundation it always was, forcing men and women into a necessary cooperation. Because which true interests and goals do men and women share, beyond sex? Anything at all?

Males represent the "upward/downward" movement of Modern social classes and economic standing. Females represent the "left/right" movement. Women do not truly move "up or down" social hierarchies, but instead, attach themselves to a male to take them upward. Women never want to go downward, although a man can falter, fail, and fall down, taking the woman with him.

In previous ages, divorce was much rarer and much more illegal, shameful, and punished. Thus the ancient Christian Church and Morality ensured that if a woman chose a man (Marriage) then she was stuck with him, no matter which direction he went. Previous ages of morality ensured that she either went 'up' with the male she chose, or 'down'. And she could not merely "divorce" herself out of her downward spiral. Modern Liberalism has changed this, for the benefit of women. Today Feminism makes it relatively difficult for any woman to go 'down'. Modern women are intended to only move 'upward', thus changing the institution of Marriage at its core. Males then encompass all the risks, and few or no rewards.

With Modernity, men can fail and drop 'down' but the woman can divorce, freely, and let him drown without paying for it as she would have in previous eras.

War of Idea(l)s:

Literally translated, which great 'goals' ought humans collect into and cooperate for? Which group represents your team? Which (ideal) appeals to you, or, to the greatest number of people? Are these goals worthy? Are they realistic and premised upon reality? Or are they completely detached, impossible, ridiculous, absurd, nihilistic? Are they religious, and, according to which particular religion/s?

The Modern "Democracy" is a competition of such ideals, based upon their popularity. The ideal with the highest amount of supporters, automatically "wins" according to Modernity. But a delusion can be popular. And nihilism can be most popular.

Æon wrote:

In previous ages, divorce was much rarer and much more illegal, shameful, and punished.  Thus the ancient Christian Church and Morality ensured that if a woman chose a man (Marriage) then she was stuck with him, no matter which direction he went.  Previous ages of morality ensured that she either went 'up' with the male she chose, or 'down'.  And she could not merely "divorce" herself out of her downward spiral.

She went up or down but she kept her life in most cases. The loss of the fear of death for choosing an unfit male was removed by the moral precedent which acted as a safety cushion for her instincts to run wild.

Fear of Death is the basis for nature's Monogamy.
Fear of Life is the basis for nihilism's Monogamy.

Æon wrote:

Modern Liberalism has changed this, for the benefit of women.  Today Feminism makes it relatively difficult for any woman to go 'down'.  Modern women are intended to only move 'upward', thus changing the institution of Marriage at its core.  Males then encompass all the risks, and few or no rewards.

The degree has changed but the moral precedent has always been the greatest benefit of all for women(weak men). Modern Liberalism just followed through on the "logic" of the precedent.

Males CAN encompass all the risks, when the risk of death becomes irrelevant.
Males get few or no rewards instead of many or few punishments.

Æon wrote:

With Modernity, men can fail and drop 'down' but the woman can divorce, freely, and let him drown without paying for it as she would have in previous eras.

With Modernity, failure is not culled and "payment" is made with paper, not blood.

Truth does not attract followers. It only sets the boundaries of acceptable promises.

The difference between quantification and qualification:
Quantification isolates in binary.
Qualification detects in relationship.

Those that attempt to quantify relationship end up with a nihilistic conception of 'relativism'.
Qualifying binaries can only be done in reference to natural behavior, generally in reference to that of a conceptual scheme like the human brain which is capable of thinking in both 'waves' and 'particles'. Waves being patterns/qualification, particles being absolutes/quantification.

Only white people can be racist.
Just like only the bourgeoisie could be classist, according to the same kind of people.

The pig has no problem with living in the pigsty or your house. You on the other hand might object to living in the pigsty though. You, the owner of the house are the only obstacle for the pig, the only reason why the pig might not feel at home in your house. It's when you don't welcome the pig inside. You must make it intolerable for the pig to be inside the house. And you don't do this by making it a worse place than a pigsty because then you don't feel well-come in your house yourself anymore.

The pig does not need to defend the pigsty against the intrusion of animals which object to living in a pigsty themselves, only against those animals which are even more tolerant than the pig itself. And that kind of defending is actually done in large parts by the farmer.

If pigs could be reasoned with then one might convince them that it's not good for themselves to drive the farmer from his own home in the long run. But if not then there is only force.

But this time is gone by now. Now we have pigs in the house and what do pigs know about defending their space but to make it less tolerable for the intruder than themselves. To be more tolerant than the intruder. Only problem is that the intruder is more tolerant, more fine with filth than the pigs in the house themselves.

Take all the memes away, clear them out, cull and purge them, and genes express the nature of the thing, the person, the animal.

How long after dogs are not fed by a human's hand, do they take to the street in packs, and hunt for what they can, expressing their natural vigor and aggression?

How long after grape vines are untended, do they begin to branch out, sprawl, and takeover whatever paths they can?

And with humans too, how long after social constraints are removed, the padlocks unhinged, do people begin to show, expose, and reveal their truest selves? Humanity is a social construct indeed, a system of lies, of histories, laws, regulations, etc. Once these are removed, one by one, a human reverts back to his/her nature. The truth is revealed. Therefore, if civilization fails to maintain the costs of its upkeep, the electricity stops flowing, the lights go out, the water quits running, and humans "wake up", as if suddenly, to a long-forgotten "secret".

Nature re-expresses herself once again.


The art of philosophy includes knowing the nature of all things, even when they are implicitly or overtly hidden from view. And especially when, human conditioning does all within its power, to stop, halt, impede, or slow down human nature.

Apparently the Arabian Nights stories are not very popular among modern Arabs.
It's among Europeans in the early 18th century where the stories had their revival.
Ancient Persia seems to share a more similar taste with modern Europeans than with modern Arabs.

The Arabs have strange noses, my guess is many of them have been infiltrated by the Jews, Gentiles, and Barbarians. Thus they begin to lose their Arab Aryan tastes.

it has to do with dirt and sand just like blacks and their noses (not exactly sure about the blacks)

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

The Arabs have strange noses, my guess is many of them have been infiltrated by the Jews, Gentiles, and Barbarians. Thus they begin to lose their Arab Aryan tastes.

Semites can be Muslim or Jews or atheist, or Marxists.
Semites are tribes. Not all Semite tribes were converted to Judaism.
Judaism is the meme.
Semites are the genes.

The term 'antisemitic' when referring to anyone who criticizes Judaism, is based on this confusion.

Semites are not Arabs.
Because some Semitic tribes were converted to Islam, like the Lebanese, and because we often bunch up all Muslims coming from that region under the heading "Arabs".

Frugal is a couch cover blanket which looks nice.
A miser enjoys his couch with plastic covers.

I don't enjoy sitting and looking at this couch anymore but that's not the point of having that couch, thinks the miser.

It's all in the mind.
It's all in the mind.

If I were to say, 10 miles away there is a million dollars, you would ride your bike in the snow and tundra with a happy smile all the way.

Modern society has gotten into what I call a Great Depression. People don't even realize how low-energy they are. They've been infected with a disease they don't even know exists. They all retreat to their man-caves, the only remnant of nature they are allowed to ever express. Their natural ways have been so suppressed and removed that they can no longer function naturally, Native Americans could ride their horses 20 miles a day, the modern man in a cubicle can barely walk 5 blocks. Mostly this is because his mind has been so removed from it's natural capacity he no longer has the motivation to. There is a deep, hidden depression within all those born into the modern era infecting the subconscious.

And if, for example, I continuously gave 1 million dollars every day, you would begin to lose motivation. Since you've been with 1000 swooning women and endless wealth, you would lose the motivation to walk 10 miles to get to it everyday. Lost the novelty.
But on the other hand, if I continuously denied you the experience of any genuine women and any genuine wealth, the same effect would happen, your mind would become numb and stop exploring the possibilities of brighter days.
These moderns can be barely asked to walk 5 blocks, when they are so depressed it messes with their muscles.

Yet, I routinely encounter women and fags who walk 10 miles to work each day with a smile on their face. Yet males always complain about work. I wonder how that works. Seen as how males are stronger and so in theory should be more capable of walking. Only cucky moderns and lumbersexuals never complain.

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

Yet, I routinely encounter women and fags who walk 10 miles to work each day with a smile on their face. Yet males always complain about work. I wonder how that works. Seen as how males are stronger and so in theory should be more capable of walking. Only cucky moderns and lumbersexuals never complain.

In a female-fag friendly system, wouldn't they be equally invested in it? You should wonder what keeps males even working at all in this current system, and then you'd arrive at diff. kinds of males from out of diff. kinds of reasons.

Lyssa wrote:

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

Yet, I routinely encounter women and fags who walk 10 miles to work each day with a smile on their face. Yet males always complain about work. I wonder how that works. Seen as how males are stronger and so in theory should be more capable of walking. Only cucky moderns and lumbersexuals never complain.

In a female-fag friendly system, wouldn't they be equally invested in it? You should wonder what keeps males even working at all in this current system, and then you'd arrive at diff. kinds of males from out of diff. kinds of reasons.

When you say "they", to whom do you refer? The males, or the females and homos?

Most males only work to put food on the table and pay rent, nothing more.
Some artists, and aristocracy types, pursue creative work to spread their ideals and creativity. These types usually have trouble finding jobs.

Also, the internet seems to confirm half of what I am saying. It seems to say that Brain cells can regenerate. There were some scientists in the 70's saying that they could, but were hushed out to perpetuate the myth that brain cells cannot regenerate, typical of the scientist community to hush out any scientists and outsiders who don't believe their myths and fairy tales.

As Trump would say "low energy people" tend to be unintelligent because stress and depression stops the brain cells from reproducing efficiently. Exercise, tumeric and blueberries and a good attitude will cause the brain to become bigger and smarter. Memetics, depressing memetics, and poor aesthetics, can have an effect in physical space.

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

Most males only work to put food on the table and pay rent, nothing more.

Whatever semblance of masculine rebellion inside these men perhaps makes them feel disdain at being reduced to a cog or a concubine.

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

Some artists, and aristocracy types, pursue creative work to spread their ideals and creativity. These types usually have trouble finding jobs.

Those who seek to become viral, are often the farthest from being artistic and aristocratic.

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

Also, the internet seems to confirm half of what I am saying. It seems to say that Brain cells can regenerate. There were some scientists in the 70's saying that they could, but were hushed out to perpetuate the myth that brain cells cannot regenerate, typical of the scientist community to hush out any scientists and outsiders who don't believe their myths and fairy tales.

What is the motive behind this? Keeping the population dumb? Seems like something a cartoon conspiracy villain would want. I see no reason why this positive message would be kept from the scientific community with the same vigor as racial hereditarianism.

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

As Trump would say "low energy people" tend to be unintelligent because stress and depression stops the brain cells from reproducing efficiently. Exercise, tumeric and blueberries and a good attitude will cause the brain to become bigger and smarter. Memetics, depressing memetics, and poor aesthetics, can have an effect in physical space.

It might produce efficiency at thinking inside the civilizational box, but shelters the mind from thinking outside it. Stress keeps one grounded in reality without drifting off into positive, hopeful, delusions.

Impulso Oscuro wrote:

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

Most males only work to put food on the table and pay rent, nothing more.

Whatever semblance of masculine rebellion inside these men perhaps makes them feel disdain at being reduced to a cog or a concubine.

Tru.

Quote :

Those who seek to become viral, are often the farthest from being artistic and aristocratic.

Depends. If you are talking about a garbage viral video, like a youtube video devoid of substance, or a splatter painting from a girls orifice, then yes. The seek to become viral is the drive of the athelete or star, the "whore". An athelete is an animal who wants to be praised and worshipped by all the males of the community, the star is a lesbian whore for females.

This is different from the stage actor, or standup comic. The stage is the modern throne, the podium is the subconscious place for aristocracy. Presidents, on stage, the stage their throne. Therefore, some games are made to promote aristocracy and higher aesthetics. Quake 3, and Hearthstone are some of these games.

Also, a bit of Jewry can sometimes be not such a bad thing. Money, is often a guiding line, to ensure the utmost quality standards and aesthetics, to present your dish in a manner befitting of a butler of a 5 star restaurant.

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

Also, the internet seems to confirm half of what I am saying. It seems to say that Brain cells can regenerate. There were some scientists in the 70's saying that they could, but were hushed out to perpetuate the myth that brain cells cannot regenerate, typical of the scientist community to hush out any scientists and outsiders who don't believe their myths and fairy tales.

Quote :

What is the motive behind this? Keeping the population dumb? Seems like something a cartoon conspiracy villain would want. I see no reason why this positive message would be kept from the scientific community with the same vigor as racial hereditarianism.

The science community is dominated by Jewry, documentaries promoting excessive praise and attention to Jewish scientists like Einstein over others. Homebrew, grassroots Americans are mostly ignored and overlooked. Those who challenge the dogma of the science community are silenced and replaced with the famed stars, like Hawkings and Neil De Grass Tyson. The scientist community promotes Hawkings, Newton and Tyson even though they are not Jews, to create the illusion of parity. They are puppets, to give the illusion that "anyone" can enter their hallowed halls. I am not sure the ulterior motivations of the science community, and why they want to perpetuate ignorance, perhaps it is simply ego, perhaps it is something more sinister. Hard to know, since they are good at silencing all truths that don't conform to their agenda.

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

It might produce efficiency at thinking inside the civilizational box, but shelters the mind from thinking outside it. Stress keeps one grounded in reality without drifting off into positive, hopeful, delusions.

Stress keeps one trapped in a cage of Dionysus, forbidding the cogs of Apollos to rotate in an efficient manner. When I am angry or depressed, I cannot focus on mathematical operations and equations, nor can I build art or geometry. At those moments, I am simply consumed by my stress and rage. A lack of stress, allows one to expand one's morality outside of the limited constraints imposed by society. It is stress when keeps us in fear of accepting our satanic thoughts, we are afraid of social ostracization for thinking thoughts which some might say are maniacal, amoral, or evil, we are afraid of the SJW's coming on us and crucify us for our political incorrectness. Without stress, we are free as a bird, free to think in a coherent way, free of having to micromanage our microaggressions, free of the need to be accepted by a jury of peers.

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

This is different from the stage actor, or standup comic. The stage is the modern throne, the podium is the subconscious place for aristocracy. Presidents, on stage, the stage their throne. Therefore, some games are made to promote aristocracy and higher aesthetics. Quake 3, and Hearthstone are some of these games.

They promote overly focused extremes that by themselves might seem impressive but without the rapport of civilization would be seen for the useless filth they are. Balance that would otherwise dominate and rule in a more natural setting is converted or relegated to peripheries.

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

Also, a bit of Jewry can sometimes be not such a bad thing. Money, is often a guiding line, to ensure the utmost quality standards and aesthetics, to present your dish in a manner befitting of a butler of a 5 star restaurant.

If i wanted [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] and a fine whore, i wouldent be here.

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

Stress keeps one trapped in a cage of Dionysus, forbidding the cogs of Apollos to rotate in an efficient manner. When I am angry or depressed, I cannot focus on mathematical operations and equations, nor can I build art or geometry. At those moments, I am simply consumed by my stress and rage. A lack of stress, allows one to expand one's morality outside of the limited constraints imposed by society. It is stress when keeps us in fear of accepting our satanic thoughts, we are afraid of social ostracization for thinking thoughts which some might say are maniacal, amoral, or evil, we are afraid of the SJW's coming on us and crucify us for our political incorrectness. Without stress, we are free as a bird, free to think in a coherent way, free of having to micromanage our microaggressions, free of the need to be accepted by a jury of peers.

I would say it is the lack of stress, that causes one to even tolerate the mutations of modernity in the first place.

The wish to own everything is the wish to destroy oneself.

The idea of owning everything yet being above it (instead of within it, and all of it) is nihilistic and the Pagan basis for the dissatisfaction of the Gods and their envy of man.

Edit: With ownership comes responsibility for maintenance [otherwise what is owned, erodes and falls into ill health] - being 'above' means disposability of what one is 'above', indifference.

Indifference cannot accompany ownership. Indifference can be a demonstration of power or ignorance.

The victim cultures and victim individuals. A proud and honest nation doesn't bring up their biggest defeats and makes celebrations out and around them, it accepts them as their weakness and a testimony to their inferiority at that given historical point and tries to follow with conclusions on what can be done better. What happens in many countries but I am referring to Poland specifically is the inversion of reality (Satyrs term, not mine) and inversion of hierarchy and the defeats are brought up as a source of pride and national identity and all the blame for them is re-directed at the external source of defeat - to be on the bottom of the pyramid when its position is inverted head-down all of a sudden means you are a winner that lost. Whilst on a national level it is far more 'understandable' (as in justifiable) since celebrating great periods in nations history would create resentment towards the mediocre current situation and the blame would be directed toward the internal factors (mostly government) for being unable to produce what their predecessors produced rather than simply re-direct the resentment towards external places (nations) by playing the victim card constantly on a personal level I find it really fucking ugly and embarrassing - especially that it is grown-up fucking males who think like this, often anti-Semites(lol!).
I don't want anybody to make any excuses for me and my failures, I live and become and pay the price - for my children to dilute me after my death and turn my sense of pride(or shame!!!) into innocence of a hopelessness would be typically feminine and thus embarrassing as a man!.

In a culture where lies are acceptable, commonplace and go unpunished; it gives everyone the opportunity to sell their own selective truths.

Every lie that doesn't get called out (if it's a decent one) provides a barrier against criticism of many other untruths.

The same way it is absurd to negate, in communication, someone's absolutist conception of a God as a position (resulting in absolutist Atheism) - it is equally absurd when done to negate a person's absolutism in any other ideological position (whether that is egalitarianism or an unforgiving evaluative judgment of their own importance). Inevitably, these characters will force the issue into being resolved with violence - and it is here where the intelligent will come out supreme, for their preparation for the circumstances which require such conflicts.

On Donald Trump's criticism and evaluations by Americans post election; words as in saying something, the act of using words to express an idea/set of ideas and observations isn't separate from action, it is action in itself. If I say something, it is an act, it has its consequences, motives, benefits/risks just like anything else albeit much lesser often, but still. DT. used words during his campaign alongside other tools at his disposal to achieve what had to be achieved to win the elections, now his repertoire has widened due to his victory and his goals have shifted but that does not mean it is impossible to determine what he will do like many Americans believe it is...simply look at the man, his past, people around him, use this knowledge to determine why he says what he says, what it says about him keeping the context of his situation in mind and then carry that through into the office that he is in re-adjusting all these factors but keeping the goal unchanged...
The Americans actually believe what they say or is it a big front for something else???

Thank you nihilist, thank you for teaching me how to love and how to hate... without you i would not be who i am today. You may have taken my women, my family, and my people but you have given me something...something you often take for granted...a target. With every keystroke, and every breath i take, i land another surgical strike as i continue to dance around you. You swing at me with your mighty strength and attempt to bribe me as i continue to dance and strike, smiling at you with joy. You have done so much to me, that the only thing i can do is give you exactly what you want and have been craving since your birth...a magnificent attack with no regrets.

Haha, I don't watch much anime, but I prefer swift, brutal executions.