|
|
Author | Message |
---|
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What do you live for? Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:38 am | |
| For fucks sake. I am a hot brazilian woman who swallows semen. Lots of it. Now go play with your dick and give me some peace. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What do you live for? Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:50 am | |
| - phoneutria wrote:
- For fucks sake.
I am a hot brazilian woman who swallows semen. Lots of it. Now go play with your dick and give me some peace. Finally! I got you to say it. I actually didn't think you were going to there for awhile. I'm surprised yet somewhat aroused that you did. Thank-you for that. Can I still get some pictures? |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What do you live for? Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:25 am | |
| - Lilith wrote:
- phoneutria wrote:
- We are animals. We live for... living.
Everything else is artifact. There's no such thing as something alive in an absolute sense.
It's a classification. One must determine what constitutes being alive and being dead.
Things are dead or alive independent of whether you classify it or not. Classification is just an act of the human brain to bring order to a system. It's not real. |
|
| |
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37248 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: What do you live for? Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:16 pm | |
| I disagree...somewhat monkeyman... classification is of the real. Reality does exhibit consistencies and congruities, for whatever period of time. That we've managed to survive using these simplistic categories, means that they reflect something real.
Yes, we construct reality in our mind but it is a useful construct and we continuously update it. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What do you live for? Mon Sep 19, 2011 6:21 pm | |
| - Satyr wrote:
- I disagree...somewhat monkeyman...
classification is of the real. Reality does exhibit consistencies and congruities, for whatever period of time. That we've managed to survive using these simplistic categories, means that they reflect something real.
Yes, we construct reality in our mind but it is a useful construct and we continuously update it. Reality, relative? I believe mental realities are. Mental realities are always subjective while that of the physical form isn't. There is only objectivity in physical forms of reality where all mental states lack it. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What do you live for? Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:14 am | |
| small example.
species.
easily classified with some training.
Yet species do not exist as the concept we are trained to see: a fixed group classified by distinct characteristics.
Species are just a transient expression of a population during the process of evolution. The species concept that we use in classification is an absolutely meaningless concept unless you are a scientist, hunter, etc. It has nothing to do with reality as such. It's just used to give order to the world for ourselves.
The classification might be useful, but it is not a true one.
There is no reality in the physical form of species. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What do you live for? Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:22 am | |
| - spuriousmonkey wrote:
- small example.
species.
easily classified with some training.
Yet species do not exist as the concept we are trained to see: a fixed group classified by distinct characteristics.
Species are just a transient expression of a population during the process of evolution. The species concept that we use in classification is an absolutely meaningless concept unless you are a scientist, hunter, etc. It has nothing to do with reality as such. It's just used to give order to the world for ourselves.
The classification might be useful, but it is not a true one.
There is no reality in the physical form of species. Interesting point. I like it. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What do you live for? Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:28 am | |
| Breeding between species will often generate sterile offspring, though. Thus, our classification is not entirely meaningless. |
|
| |
Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: What do you live for? Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:30 am | |
| - phoneutria wrote:
- Breeding between species will often generate sterile offspring, though. Thus, our classification is not entirely meaningless.
However cross breeds of different species exist also. |
|
| |
Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37248 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: What do you live for? Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:30 pm | |
| - spuriousmonkey wrote:
- small example.
species.
easily classified with some training.
Yet species do not exist as the concept we are trained to see: a fixed group classified by distinct characteristics.
Species are just a transient expression of a population during the process of evolution. The species concept that we use in classification is an absolutely meaningless concept unless you are a scientist, hunter, etc. It has nothing to do with reality as such. It's just used to give order to the world for ourselves.
The classification might be useful, but it is not a true one.
There is no reality in the physical form of species. Ah, I see....making the usefulness of the category also transient. Take human species, as an example. There is a fragmentation occurring along intellectual lines. The gene being slowly supplanted by the meme. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
|
| |
Hrodeberto
Gender : Posts : 1318 Join date : 2014-07-14 Age : 37 Location : Spaces
| Subject: Re: What do you live for? Sun Nov 30, 2014 6:59 pm | |
| _________________ Life has a twisted sense of humour, doesn't it. . . .
* * *
|
|
| |
Sponsored content
| |
| |
|