sv3rige YouTube channel - nutrition, anti-veganism, raw-meat advocacy

A summary of some of this guy's views:
- the "natural" diet for humans is raw meat, blood, and animal fat
- drinking water is unnecessary/almost unnecessary if one eats raw meat and drinks blood
- fasting doesn't only kill dead cells, it also kills healthy cells so it's not good, successful hunters didn't need to fast
- salt is bad, it ruins the mineral balance in the body
- garlic/onions are bad, they are antibiotics and destroy good bacteria in the body
- plants are generally bad, they contain antinutrients/toxins
- grains are also antinutrients and therefore bad

Some of these are the exact opposite of what I believed so far. Still not sure what to think, though many of the explanations he gives do make sense. Much harder to come to conclusions about such topics as nutrition where the truth of the matter ultimately depends on interactions which happen at a microscopic level so they can't be easily observed by the naked eye, aren't easily separable from other factors, and their consequences aren't that extreme/immediate.

That way you will never arrive at anything truthful, best way is to pick up basics of biology, anatomy, chemistry and arrive at conclusions yourself or simply try different things on yourself and take blood tests to see changes. For every retard saying 99 percent of people are retarded you will get the other 99percent of retards saying the other 99 percent is retarded and come up with more claims than evidence and argumentation based on their evidence etc,
As for water...that is some retarded shit...try running for an hour and then burn your thirst with a good steak...who are these people and why are they allowed to voice their opinions?

The body speaks to the mind. Listen and learn to understand its language.
At least that's what I try to do.
Understanding and then following what it is saying, is another issue.

The chemistry of the body changes over time. Some foods become more dyspeptic than others than they were before as one ages and vice versa. I've become more lactose intolerant in my thirties. Can't drink milk anymore. The animal fat in meat contributes to satiation of the appetite for long periods of time and the human palette loves the natural taste of animal fat because of this reason; it's reward nourishing effects on the body and the brain.

Grass fed beef and other whole grain fed meat sources are wonderful.

I'm 250 pounds of mostly muscle mass. I couldn't do without meat. Some plant foods like carrots, beans and potatoes are calorie heavy and are great sources of nutrients and energy to balance out the meat intake. Heavy fibrous fruits are good as well. As long as the calories are in large quantities and are there to support body weight, and they are unprocessed, which is important, than the diet is good. The leafy plant shit is what is bad. I stay away from that.

No water drinking?
Pffft, amateur stuff.
It is known that eating and drinking is not necessary as long as you've trained your mind through meditation.

About drinking water...
If your body senses are healthy then your thirst will make you drink the right amount of water, not too little and not too much.
If for some reason, either lacking good body senses or due to some other health issue you are prone to drink the wrong amount of water when listening to your thirst sensation you will have to look to some other indicators to gauge the right amount of water. This of course will require much more attention, energy and will-power than having a appropriate healthy sense for thirst.

I mostly agree with the guy, a lot of what he says makes sense considering my own experiences.

I always instinctively avoided eating vegetables and fruits, mostly. When I ate vegetables I would have the smelliest stools and farts and I could see chunks of undigested vegetables in the stool, and I observed some of these same things happen to other people.

I did one-day fasts during summer and it was tolerable but trying it in cold weather is torture as the body temperature reduces too much, the people advocating fasting say you should take minerals like salt and magnesium with apple cider vinegar and so on just to warm up and be able to function, but that's disgusting and I find it hard to believe that it is healthy, and it definitely isn't natural. And why would a successful hunter ever fast? Certainly it makes sense that our bodies would try to make make the best of a starving situation (a fast), but that doesn't necessarily mean it's good to bring it about intentionally and better than simply eating eating when the body signals we should through hunger.

Though I guess that if one is eating an unhealthy diet then fasting can be good as it's basically your body consuming its own fat and muscle, which is the equivalent of eating animal fat and raw meat lol, so it's no wonder so many people report feeling great when fasting, cause the only time when they're eating healthy is when they eat their own bodies. The ultimate irony for vegans and vegetarians.

The water thing I'm unsure about, haven't tried it (or even raw meat) yet but remember, he said that IF you drink blood and eat raw meat you'll need no or minimal water. Well technically he is wrong because raw meat and blood contain a lot of water relative to cooked/fried foods, which is also why he's right that the more of it you consume the less "pure" water you'd need.

If you eat spicy/salty foods then yeah you'll be thirsty and need to drink water. And if you drink salt water you'll die.

polishyouth wrote:

who are these people and why are they allowed to voice their opinions

This is funny because you say that right after having linked a video of annoying mixed race looking brown skanks and a screeching blonde who appears to be a Dr "Goldberg" lol

Strange that you'd make such a comment about sv3rige when 90% of people are more wrong about most things than he is and the comment would apply to them much better, the guy's red-pilled on many topics









He also said you're not allowed to talk about holocaust in Germany and criticized the Jews for penis mutilation, indicating he's aware of the JQ to some extent or at least doesn't consider them beyond reproach.

Some people don't digest vegetables very well.
Then there are people who have trouble (as in digestive/health troubles not moral troubles) with eating too much protein (e.g. meat).
And so on...

In former times when people of a nation or region were more homogenous, being from a similar stock and physiognomy it was rather easy to know what to eat and what to avoid, you just had to look at the common traditional cuisine and the behaviour of your family and neighbours to have a pretty good idea what will likely also be good for you.

The more mixed the nation/population becomes the more difficult it becomes to have common food for everybody. This is due to migrations but also due to mixing within the populations and not much selective pressure. Who cares if you don't digest dairy products very well if you can go to the supermarket and have a whole range of (exotic) foods available. In former times there was less calorie overhead to allow for being "choosy" due to digestive problems.

What the fuck does that have to do with anything I said to you? What of the jewess? Have I said these people on this panel should be listened? The title of the video is 'is the salt better than previously thought' and the man defending salt(sodium) is a white man that is going against the common take on salt that the jew represents... It's not my problem that I've offended you by ridiculing this guys lunny views on food nor does it transfer onto his political views I wasn't aware of when posting my first comment...
A summary of some of this guy's views:
- the "natural" diet for humans is raw meat, blood, and animal fat - natural is arbitrary and doesn't mean anything in this context...natural like he means it is something like a 'savage diet' that was forced onto the humans because of their hunter-gatherer lifestyle which didn't allow for farming anything that could provide carbs. I red up on the meat only diet and there isn't enough evidence for nor against it, I hear Peterson started eating meat only and that apparently cured his depression or at least substantially helped it which is fair enough but(and is actually consistent with the evidence we have that suggests that some people react well and some dont at all)if I can eat carbs and have much more energy for exercise and provide means for regeneration(glucose storage etc.)then why not?, because homo-sapiens during ice-ages didn't?
- drinking water is unnecessary/almost unnecessary if one eats raw meat and drinks blood - drinking water is necessary and the only reason you might get away with not doing so whilst eating a lot of meat and drinking blood is because blood is mostly water and meat has a lot of juices that are mostly...???
- fasting doesn't only kill dead cells, it also kills healthy cells so it's not good, successful hunters didn't need to fast
- salt is bad, it ruins the mineral balance in the body- evidence to that? and by what mechanism? the reason salt is so vilified is the same reason fat is instead of sugar or was for a very long time, they want to push people away from fast food which is very salty not salt itself, same way they put blaim on fats so they wouldnt have to blaim simple-carbs that were a problem but also a big businesses gateaway to huge profits
- garlic/onions are bad, they are antibiotics and destroy good bacteria in the body - true
- plants are generally bad, they contain antinutrients/toxins - true, but not all plants.
- grains are also antinutrients and therefore bad - true, but in small doses and soaked they have their benefit
If you cant evaluate the evidence(both anecdotal and scientific) fairly and instead try to live out your fantasies of being a wild-man and preacher by skewing the evidence and evaluation of it and re-phrase your statements so they sound more striking and catchy then you should shut the fuck up and not put it in public or if you do you should expect people not to take you seriously. again, who are these people and why are they allowed to voice their opinion publically?

I was under the impression the human species is omnivorous.
Using my own self as an example, I can only admit that I have difficulty with digesting meat, and an easier time digesting vegetables and unprocessed grains.
We can also observe our genetic relatives, primates - chimpanzees in particular. They are primarily herbivorous and eat meat on occasion.
This is why meat is so highly valued, and we humans appreciate it, and use it as a symbol of well-being, and wealth.

Meat is a source of more concentrated energies.
Herbivores being secondary consumers and plants being primary consumers of solar energy.
Concentrated energies are important for the evolution of bigger-brains, because the brain is a high-energy organ.
Aryans having moved north, from more hospitable environments, had to compensate with high protein diets, to deal with the harsher circumstances.
I think this was a factor in their development of higher intelligence.

I try to balance my own diet with fish and poultry.
I eat red meat, mostly beef, once or twice a week, poultry once or twice, depending on my read-meat consumption, and fish at least once a week. The rest of the days I eat vegetables, and/or grains, or I fast. Although fasting has gotten difficult as I age. When I was younger I could do it for one or even two days straight...these days I can barely manage once every month or so.
This imitates conditions in the wild where nutrients are not as easily accessible as they are in our manmade environments.

I stopped or pretty much stopped eating wheat (and other similar flours) to improve my health and it did.
But now that my body is not used to it anymore, eating larger amounts now has become even more of a health problem. What you eat also alters and creates the bacterial cultures in your intestines.

Anfang wrote:

I stopped or pretty much stopped eating wheat (and other similar flowers) to improve my health and it did.
But now that my body is not used to it anymore, eating larger amounts now has become even more of a health problem. What you eat also alters and creates the bacterial cultures in your intestines.

That's what I have come to realize. Diet affects what kinds of bacteria are in your system, which affects mood.
Each person is different, has a slightly different chemistry and lives in slightly different environments.
The body 'tells' you what it needs, and the mind has to listen and learn to understand the body's language.
The body's wisdom spans millions of years, the mind's only thousands.

Whenever I'm in doubt, I don't turn to any expert or YouTube 'intellectual' giving me information....I turn to nature.
I try to observe nature in its purest form....difficult in our age. But documentaries exist, showing how animals live, outside our human ideologies.
Our closest relatives are examples showing us moderns how our ancestors lived, how they behaved, what they ate, fornicated, socialized etc.
I use other people's judgements as advisory data, comparing it to my own observations and understanding.

polishyouth, relax man. I closed the video before I saw the guy as I almost never watch videos of women talking. I don't claim to agree with sv3rige about everything, I merely presented his views here because he makes interesting observations and claims which I didn't hear before (others here might have), some of which resonate with my own experiences and intuition.

Sorry man, I overreacted, I apologise,

Depends on blood type. Some people's dna does better on different foods.

Women are supposed to be healers so I listen to womens advice. I take it with a grain of salt same as the men I see on youtube as well. With youtube there's no way of knowing.

Lol scrolled up and im basically repeating what satyr said lol.

Anyway I am interested to know of a Hindu Legend. Some Hindus told me they never eat and just use the suns rays like a plant to convert to energy. I don't think it is possible and want to know if they are just making it all up.

Hannibal Lecter approves

Police are not satanists. But they are evil.

Some other things this guy says that go completely contrary to mainstream logic:

- cancer is is the body trying to adapt to and cure an unnatural (bad) diet, so it isn't bad by itself but a sign of a bad diet
- taking cold showers and thus increasing white blood cells (which are associated with immune system) is bad because an increase in white blood cells and the fact you need them is a sign your body is ill, basically taking cold showers is creating a problem and then solving it
- the "create a problem then solve it" also applies to people eating shit like beans, then farting themselves to death and claiming that is good because it rids you of toxicity - yes, it rids you of toxicity that you shouldn't have put in yourself in the first place lol

I now get why he laughs so much when he talks.

I wonder if Hitler wasn't vegetarian how WWII would have ended. You can't lead a nation if you are bloated and fart all the time and can't think straight because of a lack of nutrients. I also wonder who recommended such a diet to him, and if the name echoed.

OnWithTheirHead wrote:

Police are not satanists. But they are evil.

Nah, they are just mindless enforcers of the system. Well technically they can have their own opinions but they aren't allowed to enforce their own opinions, they have to enforce the system.

Autsider wrote:

- cancer is is the body trying to adapt to and cure an unnatural (bad) diet, so it isn't bad by itself but a sign of a bad diet

I don't believe in that theory of his.

Firstly, there are things that are bad and are not in the interest of your body, like getting a virus or a bacterial infection. Now, the body can possibly grow stronger* from surviving a virus or bacterial infection by training the immune system and its response, similar to how training muscles is achieved by straining those muscles beyond a certain point.
But that doesn't mean that your body wanted to get a bacterial or virus infection.

Now, is cancer a reaction of the body to something else that is damaging the body or is it itself damaging the body?
What is the function of cancer as a healing mechanism for something, how does it help the body?
I mean, a fever helps fight an infection of bacteria besides also being a burden/damaging the body itself.
But how does cancer help the body?

Does it grow tumours where it stores bad stuff which is then supposed to be removed by some doctor?
Or how would getting tumours help the body?
And if it doesn't help the body, then how is cancer something the body uses to heal/help itself?

Or is the cancer supposed to spoil your appetite eventually when you are close to dying, which makes you stop eating? I mean, that's a symptom of pretty much every serious life-threatening disease, I think.

* the body gets stronger in the area of fighting off those particular or similar bacteria, it potentially also has drawbacks, like energy expenditure, potentially unwanted immune reactions

Veganism (anti-meat eating, anti-pork) and the attack on wheat is due to genetic and memetic defects in 'non-goyims'. Not saying wheat is any better than meat; it's just not worse than a potato.

Another good channel on this topic

Very high quality content

sv3rige arrested in United Cuckoldom for eating raw animal flesh



Another example of how modern society is completely insane: It is illegal to eat raw meat in public, which is the healthiest food for humans and what our ancestors ate for 99% of our evolutionary history.

But it is legal to produce and sell people shit that ruins their health and can barely even be called food, and that shit can be publicly eaten.

Dude is a bit crazy, but doesn't deserve to be arrested. Most he deserves is a couple pamphlets, offering therapy services in the local area.

Long-skulls are more capable of thinking outside of the box, looks more Viking than most scum you see even in Scandinavia