Why modern conservatives are wrong - Order of action

There is no such thing as "conservatism" currently, or at the very least, conservatism now isn't about conserving the same things it was conserving a century or two before. Conservatism is, essentially, about conserving the status quo of the society and resisting change. This is a good thing if you already have the kind of society you want in place. It is a bad thing if you have a degenerate, self-destructive society in place because then you don't need to conserve the status quo, you need to CHANGE it and unfuck the situation.

All modern conservatism is necessarily CUCKSERVATISM. The same way cuckolds preserve the genetic offspring of an other, modern cuckservatives preserve the memetic offspring of an other, more precisely, the political ideals of the liberals of the early 21st, 20th, and 19th century.

West currently DOESN'T DESERVE protection. Before focusing on real or possible external threats (Muslims, Chinese f.e.) we must deal with internal threats and clean up our countries from the inside - Jews, corrupt elites, and degenerates all need to be executed, and women need to be put back in their place.

Focusing on external threats and protecting the society as it is (the status quo) would mean cucking for (protecting) Jews, corrupt elites, and degenerates.

This is why we must set straight the order of action:

Internal threats first:
1. Deal with Jews
2. Deal with corrupt elites doing the Jews' bidding
3. Deal with degenerate masses.
4. Establish white Shariah (codeword for white nationalist based militaristic patriarchy), putting women in their place, raising birthrates to above 2.0 etc.

THEN, once we've cleaned our society and made it worth protecting, we can speak of dealing with external threats. No aware, self-respecting, masculine man would allow himself to be used by his enemies to defend a degenerate system.

So who the fuck gives a shit if some Muslim shoots up a gay bar, or if he rapes/kills some feminist whore. Are you going to risk your life protecting faggots and whores who are fucking up your society? Are you completely fucking retarded? WE should be the ones executing fags and killing or subduing feminist whores, NOT protecting their degeneracy, holy fucking shit. I can't believe this actually has to be pointed out.

Enough good men have already died in WW2 (I'm speaking of the Axis side), but at least they died FIGHTING degeneracy, NOT PROTECTING IT. The last thing we need is more strong, masculine, healthy men going off to wars and dying so that faggots aren't thrown off the rooftops, so that women can continue being useless, "liberated" whores, and so that the elites can continue to sell out our countries to Jews in safety.

Tricky to "deal with the Jews" or any variant of Nihilism.
Their identity is built around being persecuted, and antagonized.
They thrive when you pay attention to them, their power founded on attention, of human interest and care.
They are feeble because their ideologies have to reference to anything real, but must go through a human agency to manipulate and exploit.
Their ideas are worthless if there is not, at least, one, follower.
They have to proselytize, assimilate human hosts, a all parasites must infect new hosts to lay their eggs.
They are powerless before world, because their semiotics are detached from it.
They require a proxy.

It's a waste of time to try to corner a Nihilist using reality. It is the very thing he denies, and replaces with some esoteric uni-verse, where he sings the tunes of his echo-chamber.
Look at how cAnus managed to evade all reasoning, all augments....returning to her solipsistic, self-referential, song and dance.
Using her own "logic" against her, was the only way to get through the wall of noise, her infantile chant.....creating a disturbance in the echos in her mind.

If there were to sheltering protective system, this method would not be required.
Whatever ignores or wrongly interprets, understands, nature, is quickly faced with the costs of his feebleness...no debate, no arguing, no convictions necessary.
In a sheltering, feminized culture, where culling is curbed, and other methods prohibited, all you are left with are feminine word-games.
Each mental-case should be approached differently, because in Nihilism each subjectivity acquires its own unique psychosis, with no regulating objective world to limit it.
So, first you diagnose the particular psychosis, by studying the methods, and the word-walls it uses to construct his or her private reality.

Understanding what words are, is essential. You then juxtapose your understanding, and how words are sued to connect mind to world, with what the specific specimen of degradation is doing with them. This exposes the source of its need, and its private desire.
You may choose to not engage such psychotics, but this is becoming less of an option when they are multiplying destroying everything.

Therefore, the quirkiness of its word application, and how the same words are normally used, and in reference to their established utility as this is described in the dictionary, will show you why it is psychotic - where its wounds are.
The application of these words will expose how deep, and how it attempts to heal the wound - its intelligence and understanding, expressed as judgment and application, action.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Muh freedom of speech, muh tolerance... naaah

By tolerating it one is sending the message that it is acceptable behavior, no worse than singing ordinary Christian songs.

This is the thing about degeneracy. I wouldn't mind if it were just a few degenerates aware of their inferiority being inferior while everybody else mockingly laughs at them and ignores them.

But they try to spread the degeneracy and make it out to be as acceptable a choice as any other, or even a superior choice.

Most people will necessarily try to rationalize their choices as superior, for if they were not superior why would they make them?

If choice A and choice B both have an equally desirable outcome, there is no reason to pick one over the other. On the most fundamental level, existence for living beings is about judging one course of action as superior to another and behaving in accordance with such a judgment.

This idea of equality is flawed in so many ways that the fact it is mainstream is a testament to the mental retardation and utter philosophical ineptitude of the masses. There is no other explanation.


Take the idea of abortion for example. I used to be fine with abortion, though I would note that personally I would not want to have anything to do with the kind of women who would go through with it. But to pro-choice advocates I conversed with that wasn't enough - not only must you tolerate their degeneracy, you must consider it no worse than healthy behavior, you must accept it.

This is the inevitable consequence of freedom of speech and action. And indeed, one can see how it follows from the premises - if abortion is so bad, why not just advocate for its banning in the first place? Why give people the freedom to have abortions, only to then criticize them when they exercise the freedom that you advocate they should have?

Sickness should be physically destroyed and verbally criticized and mocked, not considered a viable alternative to health. Failing to do this is a sign of a weak immune system.