On-line Radio

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

For listening to the interview, with yours truly, in three days form today:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

That was ... odd. Especially the last few minutes.

I know.
Like it was part of this script in his tiny brain.

I had to stop listening once that annoying noise started up. Plus the audio volume was all over the place. A shame because I was interested in hearing what you had to say.

This was about him....I was simply an excuse....a validation.

It appears he's worse than the MRAs... I'm saddened and disappointed thinking how this could have gone.

Never be dissapointed.
It's a sign that you miscalculated.

So much for what he called a 'new frontier'.

When you see where a medium could have been put to good use and you see it abused, it is disappointing.

E-mails With a Radio Host

Randy wrote:

From:Radio Host
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 11:43 PM
To: Satyr
Subject: Re: Show

I saw your Tarzan Vid. I see. I told you I was sorta scared of you. I figured you would think what you expressed. yes I am a genetic douchbag throw away bad shit on luck loser. Immature,struggling and confused. agreed. My career is ruined and long gone. bored and sheltered. 2 marriages. immersed in the system I try to rise above. I worship at the alter of destruction. I see no good in most people. I hate myself pretty much. I am ready. so I guess your right, burn it down. burn it all down

I was hoping that some of your message might reach the doomers and gloomers like me.

I am a fan. sorry if it wasn't to your liking. I meant no offense.

Satyr wrote:

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Satyr

“Liking”?
It was exactly what I expected.


I always see the worse in people first. It’s a form of efficiency.
I know it’s there; all I need is to find it.
It’s a defense mechanism. A way of not investing too much and not being surprised.

No offense taken.
I just think you wanted to use me as an excuse to go into your doomsday scenarios....like the videos you included in the mostly you talking vids.
No big deal...I’m emotionally self-sufficient; the end of the world already happened for me in my teens.
Ever since then I’ve been living in a jungle amongst the apes.

Randy wrote:

Building on the ground we have already covered, Its unfortunate that I am limited by the mediums used. I downloaded my vid (it was 15minutes in length, after downloading it to you tube it was only a random 38 second snipet of the actual download that made it onto the screen. .) and it "appeared" as you say "mostly me". I explain that this is only a technological limitation not a choice to highlight myself or to reduce your profile in any way. . I thought about screening out my voice in the conversation completely out but I felt that would remove the context( I have also pain-stakingly used software to turn my voice down and yours voices volume up.(very tedious process). Also. I tried to not surprise you by providing what I felt was pretty clear set of example questions I was interested in asking you and admitting that is was selfish-self-interests for interviewing you in the first place- I thought I was honest in that regard. I never claimed to be anything I am not. I enjoyed speaking to you very much regardless. I like you and I think you are smart,only twisted.
I was surprised that your vid reduced to ad homin type of reasoning. I too, was not surprised that you would determine that I was problematic somehow. .
I put "doomsday" in the search aspect of the videos because I would like that "tag" to attract more viewers. Their are aprox 5 million "peppers" out there. A recent statistic posted said that 1 out of 7 people "believe" that doomsday is coming soon. That's a big uneducated audience. If there is no audience then its just narcissistic babbling on an empty stage.
One has to wonder if by insulting and attacking a person if that can somehow close doors that have opened letting in some light to the dark areas that we a afraid of. To dismiss someone makes sense, to belittle their genetics and parents takes the argument into silly and non reasonable arenas. This is a "full-press" way of avoiding having to think about others point of view. This dismissal process eliminates any specter of injury or disappointment. The mentally unencumbered might be more open to others opinions because they do not have a deeply ingrained sophisticated matrix of personal beliefs designed to avoid the "ruff-edges" of dealing with other human beings directly. Its a hermit -crab approach. Aloofness is just another way to withdraw-like MRA's. its fear based.
You stated that you are seeking "like-minded" people. There is no one like you. its a lonely planet for the perfected ape. I submit that there is way more going on inside you than you talk about in your videos. The Tarzan video- Its sounded like you had a bad day.
After reviewing our taped conversation over and over -my favorite parts is when you laugh. I enjoy humor very much.

So much for that.

As a listener,

RH> I saw your Tarzan Vid. I see. I told you I was sorta scared of you. I figured you would think what you expressed.
yes I am a genetic douchbag throw away bad shit on luck loser. Immature,struggling and confused. agreed. My career is ruined and long gone. bored and sheltered. 2 marriages. immersed in the system I try to rise above. I worship at the alter of destruction. I see no good in most people. I hate myself pretty much. I am ready. so I guess your right, burn it down. burn it all down
I was hoping that some of your message might reach the doomers and gloomers like me.

But what message was he hoping would reach people like him? What does he think people like him need to hear?

RH> I am a fan. sorry if it wasn't to your liking. I meant no offense.

The fan part shows; but the purpose of the video lacked sincerity and seriousness. I think he should simply call it a fan video instead of making it out to be a serious space for an MRA-alternative/elitist voice or something.

RH> . . I thought about screening out my voice in the conversation completely out but I felt that would remove the context( I have also pain-stakingly used software to turn my voice down and yours voices volume up.(very tedious process).

It actually sounds the other way.

RH> Also. I tried to not surprise you by providing what I felt was pretty clear set of example questions

I only heard one question 'what are your thoughts on slavery?'

RH> I put "doomsday" in the search aspect of the videos because I would like that "tag" to attract more viewers. Their are aprox 5 million "peppers" out there. A recent statistic posted said that 1 out of 7 people "believe" that doomsday is coming soon. That's a big uneducated audience. If there is no audience then its just narcissistic babbling on an empty stage.

He's got to be joking... does he seriously believe anyone stopping by his vid., unaware of the whole feminization issues, etc. would draw any sense off it? He seems to want to endorse some form of slavery but then he complains of being enslaved by his own pets that wait on him! This pretentiousness at seriously wanting to 'help' others like him makes him worse than the MRAs.

RH> To dismiss someone makes sense, to belittle their genetics

It always stops at this; the indigestible part, the hardest aspect to face. Perhaps this is what troubles him and makes him call you twisted.

RH> This is a "full-press" way of avoiding having to think about others point of view.

Which was what??

RH> This dismissal process eliminates any specter of injury or disappointment. The mentally unencumbered might be more open to others opinions because they do not have a deeply ingrained sophisticated matrix of personal beliefs designed to avoid the "ruff-edges" of dealing with other human beings directly. Its a hermit -crab approach. Aloofness is just another way to withdraw-like MRA's. its fear based.
You stated that you are seeking "like-minded" people. There is no one like you. its a lonely planet for the perfected ape. I submit that there is way more going on inside you than you talk about in your videos. The Tarzan video- Its sounded like you had a bad day.

If he's mentally unencumbered to others opinions, he wouldn't have taken your video as vid. on him personally. If he doesn't believe in doomsday scenes, why does he care and react to what you say on such believers? Shouldn't he be appreciating your message and the need for it to be heard by more people like him?


p.s. 1. The Indian caste system is not really a feudal system; while the hierarchy is shared in common, the latter was allegiance and economy based. A vassal or serf could have more than two masters. A master could be both a master and a vassal at the same time, etc. The caste system *castus is based on a nature/inner race of the spirt differentiation. One could be born into the 'class' of a shudra or kshatriya but still bear the varna/'colour' of a Brahmin, yet without forsaking the status into which one is born. Its derived from innate self-nature.

p.s. 2. It is an error to compare ancient slaves to pet animals or dogs. Feudal is believed to be derived from the runic fehu-od - cattle-goods or moveable wealth. Among I.E.s, it appears not all animals were regarded as 'wealth'. So a slave can be thought of as a property/wealth in terms of cattle/cows and in that sense to 'domestic animals'.
The slave extended the master, being his representative property and a lower version of the master's wife. The book I'd suggested earlier on eco. structures of antiquity has more on this.

Thing is, we do have slavery today.
The system is built around convincing the slave that he's already free....or that he needs to compete, for the master's good will, with other slaves.
This is what materialism is all about.

I think I said "like" the caste system.
I could be wrong.

Asking me if I'm "for slavery" was a way of asking me if I was for a more overt or more older form of slavery.
Way to freedom is to not give a shit about peer pressure, not considering all as being your kind or your peers, not buying into the materialism and hedonism and by knowing yourself; knowing who you are and what you want and what you are capable of.

Can't help it....I had to smile.

I think his point is a good one, though, however he behaves. Your Tarzan metaphor does seem to advocate apathy and a turning away from the world.

For example, the apes already have a slew of memetic weapons to turn on you - racism, sexism, etc. It is not as if they are harmless. You only exist as you do now because you are one man on the internet, almost unknown.

A gorilla could easily kill Tarzan, no matter their relative intelligence.

Tarzan does not turn away from the world as he is forced to exist and to adapt to it.
He turns away from his identification with the apes.
The apes might be bigger and faster and stronger than he is, and they can kill him at any time, and this is where his brain must be utilized to protect himself as best he can.

He cannot change nature or how apes behave or think; believing that you can raise an ape form its nature to a higher state, in this way saving yourself from the possibility that it might go crazy, one day, and kill you, is naive and based on fantasy.
Trying to use reason with an ape is wasted energy.

I've been trying to discuss some basic truisms with internet gorillas for years...one of them D63 is at this moment displaying his apishness and his unsalvageable nature over at ILP.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
At this point a few of the others, yet to be banned, are toying with his brutish, weak, mind; they are not trying to talk sense with it and they are certainly not taking it seriously.

Life is uncertain and not even intelligence can save you sometimes...but it might increase your chances.

That was quite a showing over at ILP
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I thought you had been banned from that Dead Man's Land of Zombies.

Thanks. No, worst I got was warnings. I was less confrontational than you.

apaosha wrote:

Thanks. No, worst I got was warnings. I was less confrontational than you.

As you may have, by now, noticed, he not only beat me up but he did so with a proverbial hand tied behind his back.
Anyone with any experience with me and this man-child, and with the usual dislike for me in the mix, would find it difficult to believe that this douche-bag could kick the intellectual-ass of a little girl, let alone ...moi....if I would be allowed to be so bold to say.
At first glance one could almost be inclined to take his word for it - if he were not present like you Mono and some others - but that he then goes that extra mile to claim that he did so, under pressure and while drunk, only shatters the almost convincing delusion to bits.

I would accept a new debate, with rules, if it were not for my certainty as to the possibility of such an 'event' occurring.

In the mind of this little nitwit things proceeded according to plan, and that he's spent months name-dropping me to death only exposes the truth of what really happened.
I would challenge anyone to rummage through the cesspool of mediocrity, called ILP, to find one instance of this mind's brilliance.

Being drunk is his steady excuse for being stupid and dull. One is surprised by this since drunkards are usually much more entertaining.

I now proceed to your remark of agreement with good ol' Randy, the rowdy radio host.
It is related to the previous.
Good ol' Raggedy Randy accuses me of fear. Never denied it.
But feeling an emotion and being taken by it are niot the same.

He accuses me of defensive tactics.
Never denied it.
In fact we all engage on more or less obvious defensiveness daily.
Life is a perpetual defensiveness....your immune system is the epitome of it.

Now, on the topic of changing society.
My family has paid dearly for its rebelliousness...and I am damned if I will add more blood to that pool.
I am mostly reluctant having gained a deeper understanding of human nature.

I use this example many times but it is indicative of my stance.
I recall during my early years in elementary school being emphatically hurt by a fat kid who was picked on by the others.
I thought about him constantly. Every time I witnessed his abuse and pain I had to avert my eyes.

I decided to befriend him; offer him compassion and the feeling that he was not garbage and a loser.
I did so. after a few weeks he began casting aspersions and he started abusing me.
At first I was perplexed.
How could the one who knew what it was to be abused and bullied be so abusive towards the only one that showed him compassion and friendship?

I realized much later that all that stood between this fat boy and the bullies was opportunity. If given the chance this abused boy would become the abuser.

I also realized that my grandfather's sacrifice was all in vain.
What has changed in the last 50 years, except that the older more direct method of population control, using threats and violence, has given way to more modern, indirect methods of coercion and manipulation?
I refuse to spill any more of my own family's blood to protect those that have no ability to appreciate what is occurring and who enter into this movements for purely hedonistic, immediately gratifying reasons.
I will publicly support liberalism because I am not a man in power or part of the current elite but in private or when speaking honestly I will not pretend that I agree with liberalism or the left.

My help is offered only to those rare ones.
The rest I use or ignore.

The comedy continues.
He now insults (trolls) and if you respond in kind and tear him a new one it is YOU who will be the "bully" and the one that must be protected by the "moderators" who will find in him a kindred spirit and a market base to be attracted and protected.

His "lizard brain" is taking over...only with him it's always fear; fear that has to be numbed with alcohol.

Perhaps I just think that there is a danger here. Were I to be truly honest with people in real life then I would be imprisoned. Instead, I compromise for the sake of safety.

The matter is whether one can stomach the necessity for this compromise. I'm not really concerned with saving the proverbial fatty from being bullied. With me, I challenged the school bully and got beat up. He got expelled, which was lucky for me. I supposed I used the system successfully.

Which is the point. Perhaps a form of husbandry would be appropriate to be applied to those who deserve it. Although saying that, I wonder if that is not already the case.

It is already the case.

Being honest to people depends on the time and place.
If you are on-line discussing philosophy then what the hell are you pretending you respect the other or why would you tolerate his stupidity?

The only reason, once more, is found in the imposition of a rule, a social rule, that protects the idiot and forces you to swallow your tongue and "give him the benefit of the doubt" just so that you are not totally expelled.
Therefore, egalitarianism forces censorship.

Do you think you can reason with that retard over at ILP or that the moderators will take your side on the matter?

Look at him attacking from a distance then claiming he's "in your face" after months of him mentioning me almost weekly.
Look at him resorting to ad hom attacks in a thread dedicated to trolling and internet bullies, for crying out loud!!!!
Look at him scrambling to save-face by trying to reinvent reality and the experience of events.

Look at him totally missing the point about Nietzsche's overman and trying to connect him with Nazism.
Is this brain salvageable? Not really, but he will enjoy the protection of those who fear that they will be next if they allow this moron get what he deserves.

Is this animal to be called "human"?

The retard repeated over and over again the scenario of "tracking me down and finding me in a paraplegic's wheelchair".
A resentful coward's daydreams. He feels crippled intellectually so he imagines the other being crippled physically.
As if, even if I were a paraplegic, this would contradict my opinions; like if I am ugly my opinions concerning beauty are totally debunked.

Now I ask you: Why would I care about this genetic filth and why would I risk life and limb to protect him?
Why, if he were getting the shit kicked out of him, would I intervene?

Satyr wrote:

The comedy continues.
He now insults (trolls) and if you respond in kind and tear him a new one it is YOU who will be the "bully" and the one that must be protected by the "moderators" who will find in him a kindred spirit and a market base to be attracted and protected.

His "lizard brain" is taking over...only with him it's always fear; fear that has to be numbed with alcohol.

I think I struck a nerve.

What is ironic is that he is now behaving exactly as a real troll does: insults given in hope of an emotional reaction.

A truly sad little man.

If I were you I would turn this as an example to the moderators.

Look how they tolerate the retard but if one responds in kind and destroys him he will go crying to the authorities and get someone banned.
You can't just leave this shit unsaid. no matter what the consequences are.

Use him for the one thing he is useful as: an example of modernity and decay and feminization....of sheltering and leveling and increasing mediocrity.
Expand the playing field; include the passive audience who stand aside feeling safe.

These morons are making him possible; they are not innocent bystanders or objective observers, they are passive-aggressive participants and enablers.
He's the end product of their "principles".

This is quantity versus quality!!

Do you think I can save them? Why do you care?

Well, I gave my little bit of redemption where it was needed. Maybe somebody will take it.

Satyr wrote:

Can't help it....I had to smile.

I hope you manage to make a video on death sometime. Apparently, Physical Death seems to be the only kind he knows, and fears most.

Satyr wrote:

These morons are making him possible; they are not innocent bystanders or objective observers, they are passive-aggressive participants and enablers.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

apaosha wrote:

Do you think I can save them? Why do you care?

I don't....at least not much and not in the way you mean.

I care because they are representative of a world I am forced to deal with. I care for that one, amongst thousands, who might be different.
I care because they are fun and funny to deal with and to sue as examples; interactive specimens of the very ideas I promote as being valid...living proof.

apaosha wrote:

Well, I gave my little bit of redemption where it was needed. Maybe somebody will take it.

It was good.

Did you notice?
They got rid of the thread. It seems that even for the administrators it represented a reminder of who they are, what they are contributing to, and how prejudiced they are.

The head-douche-bag Humean only punished you and the retard D6 when you responded in kind.
If you had not he would have gone on as if the retard never insulted you or conducted himself as the "trolls" he wants to dismiss.
Classic sheltering. You only intervene when the side you want to exclude behaves in a way you accept from the noes you wish to protect and to include.
They are enablers and, in their heart, they associate themselves with those retards they want to attract in the droves.

It was a nice exercise; an interactive school of modern human behavior and an example as to how sheltering and social conventions work.
If you go to other threads where you are not present...notice how much insult is permitted.

I went through this shit on numerous occasions.
I was insulted ridiculed mocked constantly...then when I retaliated and tore them apart, suddenly the admin would appear, as if he just woke up, and I was reprimanded and gone.
The same retards would then go on and one, mocking me when I could not respond and nothing was done about it; or some would later engage in the same shit with others and nobody cared.
Classic.

Ask James S. Saint why he needs to anthropomorphize reality with the term "God"; why is the term so important for him?

------------------------------

Lyssa wrote:

I hope you manage to make a video on death sometime. Apparently, Physical Death seems to be the only kind he knows, and fears most.

I might...but I think Randy is already dead from the neck up.

On a side-note...
I don't know about learning anything on the Forum circuit. In the end it all reverts back to the usual social conventions and principles...but one thing I do know and I know it for certain:
If there is one discipline which is elucidated by internet shenanigans and forum intellectualizing and socializing then it is psychology.
No other information can be taken as valid coming from anywhere on the internet, especially not these public, all-inclusive social forums pretending to be political or philosophical, but if you wish to study human nature real-time then the internet is the perfect place.

Take any discussion on ILP....some of it is insightful, most of it is bland and moronic, but all of it offers human nature on a platter.
Not only human nature but more so how social methods are employed to curb and control and direct human nature.
Along with psychology it's outcrop sociology can be studied here on the Internets.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

What if you were the witness to a violent act...the questions arise:

1 - What justification would you use, if any at all, to intervene? Would your intervention be instinctive and so one you could not control and so cannot justify until later when the storm had passed and you tried to justify your actions to yourself?

2 - If one of the participants were a female and the other a male, how would it affect your intervention or lack thereof?
If the aggressive one were female would you intervene? Why would you intervene if the "victim" were a child or a woman, assuming that they were strangers?
Why is a man being assaulted presumed to be deserving of it whereas a women is never so? Why are we more inclined to laugh at a male being assaulted than when a female is?

3 - When witnessing a violent act why do you empathize with the victim rather than the aggressor?
Is the plight of the lamb more intimate than the joy of the wolf's success?
One dies...the other lives. Why does the dying one reach us and how are we not predators when our life depends on the destruction and consumption of other life?

4 - What if the participants were of mixed ancestry or of different species?
Is the life of an animal less worthy of intervention than that of a human; if so why?

5 - Taking the reward of the giver as self-evident, what reward does the one intervening in a dispute amongst strangers hope to gain?

6 - In regards to "justice" and what is "right"....is saving a person from a beating he or she brought upon himself by cheating another or by slandering his name or by threatening his family a noble act?

I liked the ending. We'z in deep now biatch.