Transhumanism

John Cleese tears apart transgenderism in less than 2 minutes (Monty Python) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— gr0upthink (@gr0upthink) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Transhumanism is not about transcending the biological type called "human", because this occurs naturally. It is part of evolution theory.
It is like worshipping change, as if there is such a state where change doesn't apply. Homo sapiens will be surpassed whether we want it or not.
What many transhumanists truly want is to "transcend" the past, as a burden that limits their options in the present; they want the past erased, or revised, or forgotten altogether. It is this past constantly made present that truly irks them.
Clean slate, i.e., tabula rasa, is what they idealize. A nothing and nowhere to start over from, and so nihilism is their priority, their prime mover, their ideal, their divinity.

Spreading the meme, using linguistics....
This is how zey will get into China and start to undermine it as zey did the US.
Who will they appeal to among the Han?
The lowly, the desperate, the degenerate, the cowering coward, the vengeful f mutant...this is their audience, their way "in", all those wronged by natural selection, growing in numbers because man has intervened to shelter them form their natural end.
Weakness is zeir source of power; desperation is zeir source of invigoration; degeneracy is zeir cesspool of regeneration.

Transcending the human is an expression of the desire to transcend the physical, viz., the body's limitations, contradictions of the mind's pretences and lies, its mortality, the past being constantly made present, imposing itself on the mind's fantasies.
A desire to be determined by what is said, and heard, and not what is seen, sensually perceived.

Empire decline exacerbates this having already prepared the circumstances after generations of sheltering, propagating unfit mutations and the worship of hedonism.
Pleasure being how the postmodern determines what is probable, i.e., truth.
Pleasure being a negation of need/suffering, i.e., the experience of existing.
A desire to escape the coming "catastrophe" of transitioning from one world order to an-other, which remains unpredictable.
A desire to escape this inward - hide from it, encasing oneself in an alternate subjective, self-made world encompassed by words/symbols - a semiotic womb to be reborn when things settle down.

Practically....end of empire is accompanied by emasculation - Feminization of Man.
Femininity dominates leaving a void of masculinity.
Having promoted the eradication of "toxic masculinity" feminized individuals seek to reinvent it, and then become it - hypermasculine - so as to fill a void they promoted and produced.
Trans-masculinity is a caricature of masculinity, concealing a feminine personae.
The error is in the assumption that feminine/masculine genders are social constructs - like race - contradicting natural selection with the idea of social selection.
As if a few generations of social selection can "correct" millennia of natural selection. It is the body which is the manifestation of these millennia, and so it is this body that must be denied.

The female transvestite seeks merely to pass. Do not gaze at her too long, for her disguise is fragile. But the male transvestite is his own best voyeur, exploiting his internalized eye for maximum excitement. (SP 1990)

— CamillePagliaQuotes (@PagliaQuotes) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Sexual dysfunctions – caused by genetic mutations – are common in nature; part of the evolution process. Sexual dysphoria is part of maturation, and finding your identity, becoming comfortable with yourself – your sexuality.
Transsexuality goes further, attempting to ideologically impose dysfunction and dysphoria, not as an expectation but as the new rule.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— I,Hypocrite (@lporiginalg) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Every Meme, i.e., ideology, dogma, has its own ideal; its own conception of the 'good man,' the 'perfect citizen'.
Memes are gene specific, so this ideal is born out of a particular relationship between a particular population/people and a particular environment, creating a particular culture, i.e., world-view, with particular objective and strategies to attain them.
Ideals mutate, i.e., evolve, not only through semiotic transmission to other peoples, but due to the passage of time, and the ongoing interaction of the decedents of said people and a changing environment.
Over time some ideals become abstracted out of reality, no longer representing the ancient relationship but becoming self-referential, i.e., solipsistic.
This process of detachment is defensive, if and when the culture is successful and begins to produce excess numbers of resources - material and human.
This detachment, and inevitable inversion, is nihilism.

Memes, and the cultures they create, represent survival and reproductive strategies.
Some are predatory, others prey, others parasites...some evolve from one to the other over time.
Each one produces a particular kind of man, despite their objectives, i.e., ideals, because all of them evolve within an indifferent fluctuating world.

Therefore, humanity will be surpassed, but when and how is somewhat beyond prediction.
Each ideology/dogma has its intent, but none can perfectly measure the effect of cosmic interactivity, i.e., flux, particularly when we take account of chaos and are not only predicting using order.

I did a video about cross-dressing serial killers:[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— I,Hypocrite (@lporiginalg) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Physical/genital mutilation is their mo....a signal that you belong to their nihilistic cult - blood offering, a kind of self-sacrifice indicating what you are willing to endure to be saved, to be selected....
It's all determined so it is divinity expressing its choice.
Selected by fate...god, absolute order, to be among those liberated from the tangible entering into the divine spiritual realm of mind.

You have no choice. Your choice is really god's, or the universe - Deus.
you are simply an agency of its ongoing transcendence, as you overcome your physical form and through you it chooses to make you something in its image.
A non-biological, intangible, non-binary, becoming...transforming into the next phase of its development, towards this singularity, where all diversity is finally absorbed by the one.

The first step is to convince you of what you desperately want to believe, that you are not your body, that you are an idea - that everything is an idea, and like all ideas it can change wilfully - not your will, divine will, because all ideas exist in a mind and the mind is universal.
You are but a conduit of its will - it wills you to become idea.
You have no will - you are "innocent."

Satyr wrote:

Fuckin Peterson, and again the fuckin Nazi bullshit, because they just cant help themselves.

A more competent interviewer would have asked this weeping faggot, this sycophantic jew-cucked, pseudo-intellectual charlatan, this indoctrinated woman, who can’t overcome any of his inferiorities, or intellectual illusions/delusions despite his world-class edumacation…..how exactly he qualifies the difference of “tolerance”, between, adults sexually mutilating themselves, and children being sexually mutilated. Let’s recall the deranged autistic rodent hailing from the transgender loving capital of the world, the UK, who was here recently laying his mind farts of wisdom, through his sockpuppet: “If it don’t hurt no one……den….”

Let’s take this retarded degenerate logic seriously. See where it leads. Alrighty, so, we first assume that we should reject the sexual mutilation of children, according to this fag, because they are under legal consent age, and therefore “innocent”, but at age 18, suddenly, magically, their decision to sexually mutilate themselves becomes acceptable, tolerable, because, according to this clown, they have now lost their innocence, lost the crucial non-decision making component that makes what happens to them an immoral outrage based on the difference of 12 calender months. Alrighty then, But, then, if someone is unfortunate to carry an unconscious naive mentality of a child into their adulthood, do they not still retain their “innocence” and “purity” where sexually mutilating them would be a gruesome desecration, according to this fuckhead? Mind you, we also must figure in the variable of “hurt” ‘injury’ as well. When a child gets sexually mutilated who does it hurt, as opposed to an adult getting sexually mutilated who does it not hurt? and why? So, an 18 year old can make conscious responsible decisions of its own accord, where it pays the consequences of it and we should allow it and embrace it for the good of society and not give a shit what happens to them, but a 17 year old on the other hand, cant, and we must reject it, according to this shithead. It must have something to do with how the months and weeks between the two ages that evolve that decision-making trait. Shit, I guess I need to study up on the neurological evolutionary science of 12 calendar months.

So we can say that if a child gets sexually mutilated, then their family and loved ones may feel “hurt” emotionally (i.e sad, distraught, distressed), for the gruesome perversion committed against them. But do not adults also have loved ones? Would not a loved one of an adult perhaps, feel “hurt” in the same emotional context? Adult loved ones must not have feelings, or give a shit. That must be it, and society at large, certainly doesn’t give a shit either, therefore justifying that no one gets “hurt” when an adult sexually mutilates themselves, according to this mentally addled media personality derelict.

How about the individual themselves? Do they not get hurt, or feel pain, either physically from the mutilation and scars, or mentally and emotionally from the loss of their sexual identity? ah yes, according to this freak, the pain is only a social collective event. Everything happens to them, not them doing anything of their own.

I can’t go on. I might end up mad. Good thing these freaks, despite all their PhDs and academic credential toilet paper, are not aware enough to realize they are the problem that perpetuates what they claim to be against, because then someone like Joe Biden might actually be a threat.

No pain here. Nobody being hurt here. Who's to blame? No one. Not the doctors, or her degenerate family members who brainwashed her, nor any cultural influences. She had no choice, but to mutilate herself. No one got hurt, because it only happened to her, and no one else, therefore, she's not really feeling any pain, because others didnt feel any pain when this happened to her.

We need Peterson's tears to heal her. His holy divine tears will bring her womanhood back.

She’s lost her voice, her chest, and doesn’t know if she can ever have kids.

She has BPD, so doctors cut off her breasts and gave her T.

“There’s how many mental health disorders that make you hate your body, and the solution isn’t to change your body, it’s to fix your brain.” [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Billboard Chris (@BillboardChris) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— esotericbot (@esotericbot) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

transhumanism is a novel idea, in that it exposes the limitations of human in its current form

they believe flesh is weakness, and want to overcome it by becoming pure intellect,
by pure intellect, i mean they want to shed the body and live in a kind of mind-augmented cyber-complex reality
where there is no body and no flesh sensitive to pain, in essence, they want to detach from this real.ti, enter, and interact with a new "more complex parra-reality, embodied with higher levels of beauty, love, physical and hyper-mental expression.

goodness-weird wrote:

transhumanism is a novel idea, in that it exposes the limitations of human in its current form

No shit?

goodness-weird wrote:

they believe flesh is weakness, and want to overcome it by becoming pure intellect,

So, you are a nihilist.
You dream of a world where the physical is erased and all that remains is mind - god.

goodness-weird wrote:

by pure intellect, i mean they want to shed the body and live in a kind of mind-augmented hyper-complex reality
where there is no body and no flesh sensitive to pain, in essence, they want to physically detach from this real.ti, enter, and interact with a new "more complex parra-reality, embodied with higher levels of beauty, love, physical and hyper-mental expression.

You, as a classic nihilist, believe that by shedding the physical, you can escape need/suffering, the very experience of existing.
You haven't truly transcended Abrahamism, you've simply eliminated the medium, the god part.
You dream of becoming god.
You think you are capable of attaining this level of purity.

i believe in super intelligent, mind-augmented crypto paradise engineers, hacking human mind, in the light of super-hedonism and pure intellectual expression, yes, free from physical limitation. ie, the body, a kind of a highly complex, futuristic mind-track,

Then...you are a nihilist.

oh yes, i´m such a nihilist, because i don´t romanticise the body

because im not a fan of a figurine of flesh, that is a potential torture victim,
because i don´t think nature gives a fuck about it´s struggles

because i find more novelty in a squirrel or tiger than in man,

Body is past made rpesent....it is presence - existence.
Nature is the sum of all past nurturing.
Ergo, body is nature.

The rest are ideas/ideals in your mind - fantasizing existence without the physical, tangible; fantasizing existence without the experience of existing.

Yes, you are a nihilist....you want to nullify the body and replace it with an imagined avatar, sacrificing all its memories.
You want to forget. Essentially you have a death wish, but are afraid of losing your consciousness.

You dream of being like christ; reborn as mind with no body.
A Lockean tabula rasa.
You imagine yourself building yourself from scratch.

body is nature?

then why does it flee in the night into it´s artifice nest?
why does it avert it´s gaze from the sun and stars?
why doesn´t it dance in euphoria at serene shores?

limitations? yes the body has limitations, nature doesn´t, nature just is,
and you wouldn´t say a bird has limitations because it doesn´t walk much, and just hover with grace,

"body is nature"

"body is a battery for maleficent alien overlords,"

both are equal valid theories,

i just don´t want anything from this world,
because i know that there isn´t any real power to gain from it,

and i don´t wanna exist in some periphery of philosophy, chasing some kind of non-phenomenal pseudo gnosis,

and i don´t believe in god either, and if he exists i don´t care if he cares for me or not,

and even if there was an almighty god, he would care nothing for humankind,
he would just indulge himself in dreams crazier and wilder than no mortal man can imagine,

How the Transgender Agenda fits into the Transhumanist movement.

A short clip from my speech “Transhumanism: The End Game” at the Better Way Conference held by the World Council for health earlier this year. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Angelo Giuliano (@Angelo4justice3) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]