A War Like No Other

Nazism was Germanic, genetic, supremacist racism, claiming that a segment of the Indo-European tribes were the physical and mental – genetic – standard for all of mankind; Judaism is memetic, i.e., moral, ideological, supremacist racism, claiming that a segment of the Semitic tribes, the Afro-Asiatic race, is the psychological – memetic, moral, spiritual – standard for all of mankind. Both want to make themselves a universal ideal all ought to imitate and submit to. Both aspired and still aspire to global hegemony, tolerating no alternative.
This contradicts Aryan, Indo-European – masculine – spirituality. The Greeks respected and tolerated gods and traditions from wherever they came from, and though they were racist – believing that appearance is more than superficial, or physical – the Hellenes believed their superior beliefs would be proven on the battlefield, via direct and open competition, and not via feminine undermining and insidious strategies. They found something valuable in all traditions and all spiritual beliefs from around the Mediterranean basin and across the Asian frontier, integrating many deities from other tribes into their own traditions. They never considered their gods the singular one-god all must worship, nor themselves as the only ideal all must imitate and be like. They did think themselves superior but not the singular ideal – the gods were that and nobody else.
Maybe in these similarities and differences we can find the motives for what transpired during the second war and what has been transpiring ever since it ended in Germany’s capitulation.

Destroy the family and you destroy a people.
Destroy the traditional family and you eliminate a alternative to state sponsored values - collective ideals.

Recruit individuals from dysfunctional or broken families, e.g., freaks, sexual deviants, addicts, all the "victims" of missing fathers and abusive, emotionally unavailable, mothers.
Reinvent what a "family" was, by reinventing gender roles. Begin by rejecting biological identifiers, i.e., physical traits, the body as a present manifestation of the past.
Promote lifestyles that reject procreation and focus on hedonism.
Promote individuality by making lifestyle, personal well-being, the primary objective.
The "best" world is a world adapted to my needs; a world-view interested in a world that ends with the individual's death.

Ancient -Greek Proverb wrote:

A society grows great when old men plant trees in whose shade they know they shall never sit.

A society decays, degenerates, when "men-children" could care less about anything they will not live to experience.
Ego, disconnected from body; ego detached from self.
Not "know thyself" but forget thyself, ignore thyself, negate thyself, medicate thyself, transcend thyself, deny thyself, distract thyself, deceive thyself....
Minds with no bodies.
Addiction/Obsession is how they cope with the ideologically surgical amputations.
Pleasure for its own sake. Not a means but an end in itself.
Hedonism is how such minds medicate their lives away.

A trend....
Used to be that men were dead-beats, running away from their family to pursue a life of hedonistic escapism.
These days it is women who are doing so.

Women used to raise children on their own, increasingly it is men who are single parents.

Feminisation of men...

Patting my back...

Check out the date of the first post, when this thread was started:
Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:33 am
And I was posting on it way before that.

Whoever recalls I was talking about the "Feminization of Man", since the late 90's early 00's.

Check out when I first began a thread on words....language...and how it is misused and an integral part of nihilism...
Sat Apr 25, 2015 6:48 pm = [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
And I was posting on it way before that.

It's more Domestication of men, in Frontier societies (Americas), the reduction of Masculine traits and virtues, along with decrease in Testosterone, as conquest of the Native Americans were completed, along with participation in conventional world wars.

'Feminization' does not accurately paint the whole picture of the 'female' half and participation in society, as sexual selectors, and the ones who 'allow' weaker and feminine-male genes to pass.

But yes, admittedly, you honed into the trends of the times.


Western Civilization is ending the "weak men create hard times" phase, and now entering the hard times.

It seems a long list of wars are on the horizon; I hope I'm wrong.

I'm going to repeat myself for the umpteenth and final time.
Feminization is before domestication. Feminization refers to the biological, domestication to the social.
Feminine precedes all forms of domestication. Domestication is a product of culture.
Femininization is genetic.

Back to whatever you were doing.

The problem with the title should be easy to recognize and accept...

What does 'Feminine' signify and imply?


Is wearing a skirt 'feminine'? Yes, in the United States, a male wearing a skirt is considered feminine. However, to the Scotts and Celts, wearing a Scottish Kilt is masculine attire. Thus, the act of wearing a skirt or kilt is not necessarily 'feminine', but culturally-relative. If you want to base your thesis on this, then you must admit its cultural relative aspect as a logical flaw. How do you then determine what is 'masculine' or 'feminine' across cultures?

How about wearing long hair? Again, in the United States, or in Roman Imperial history, wearing short hair is identified with males, and wearing short hair might be considered a 'masculine' trait whereas long hair is 'feminine'. In East Asia, or even European cultures at certain times, wearing long hair is neither masculine nor feminine but instead attributed to high social class/caste, and a mark of nobility. This continues today in East Asian culture, and in the indigenous American Indian tribes. As a male, having your hair cut, is a sign of weakness and being defeated. So again, this is culturally relative.

So how about an act of gossiping? Females are seen and recognized as "natural gossipers", and science even clocks and records the amount of communication and words spoken daily between men and women. Does this then mean that "masculine men" do not gossip? On the contrary, male gossiping can be far worse than females. Simply watch MainStream Media, and you can see "talking heads", mostly male, gossiping about political, social, and cultural news, all day long. So, finally, there is no definitive separation between "masculine and feminine" in the realm of gossip. Because it cannot Qualified, if it even is Quantified.


Because of these few, simple, easy-to-observe flaws, it then goes to the greater point. What exactly about males (and which males exactly) is 'feminine' when it was not before? And these specific qualities, which you must offer and defend, are they beyond the scope of one culture, at one time?

This is why I offered 'emasculation' and 'domestication' as far more accurate markers.


You can be offended and dismissive as you want. It makes no difference to me, whether you want to accept criticism or not.

Your confusion between memes and genes is not my problem.
Cultural relativism is what they say.

Now be quiet...you are clueless.

I didn't expect you to embarrass yourself with a counter-argument.

My objection stands, and your theorem will be recorded as half-complete.

Who and why has been using feminism to destroy male role models?
Despite losing money they persists to produce movie after movie, t.v. show after t.v., show gender swapping, portraying males - particularly white heterosexual males - as idiots or weak or cowards or evil.
See comic book industry, once the place young boys discovered their idols.

This may seem trivial but factor in nation-states that lack any traditional foundation, a mythology, to draw from....like the U.S. and you will find here males being disconnected, alienated, from society.

Follow the money.
The entertainment industry was, supposedly, about making profit, so why, then, would it now produce failure after failure, disregarding falling box-office profits, declining sales?
Watch television commercials and notice how often they portray couples of a black male and a white female?
Rarely, if ever, a white male and a black female, or an oriental male or female. Why most often a black male and not a black female?
What is their agenda?
Think. This is not accidental.

Art is the canary in the mineshaft - fArt, it has become.
Why is cRap so popular, when it is superficial, primal, low level, using word pop-cultural associations to display, to brag, to self-inflate, at best?
Why is the music industry so pathetic these days....why are movies so crap?
Watch fArt award shows. Notice the patterns.
Americanism.
Follow from where and why, trace the links, the causal chains....discover the motive.
A War Like No Other
Feminine warfare using semiotics.
Undermining. Slandering. Gossiping.
Using plausible deniability, using word-games to negate - cancel - to destroy, not create...to nullify, to appropriate and warp, ever so slightly.

I can't stop thinking about this. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Bleeding Holograms (@zionyde) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Quote :

Then out spoke brave Horatius, the Captain of the Gate:

“To every man upon this earth, death cometh soon or late;
And how can man die better than facing fearful odds,
For the ashes of his fathers, and the temples of his Gods,

And for the tender mother who dandled him to rest,
And for the wife who nurses his baby at her breast,
And for the holy maidens who feed the eternal flame,
To save them from false Sextus, that wrought the deed of shame?

They're pushing this candidate in France, sensing a shift towards the right.
They need to control both sides of the dialogue.

It is what they do.
Who financed both England and France, making a profit when Waterloo settled the conflict?

Those who have ever mixed are pushing miscegenation of all other races, most importantly of Europeans males.
Those who want to feel safe in European established and maintained nations push for open borders and immigration changing the essence of a nation state.
Parasitism?

Are they envied? Is that the problem?

The United States is suffering deeply from Delegitimacy.

If Epstein and Maxwell dirt came out, against recent US Presidents and US Deep State officials, it would be the final nail in the coffin.  They would *NEVER* allow that to happen.  This is something even the "conspiracy theorists" fail to understand.

Epstein and Maxwell protect the US Government, along with their Yisrael/Zionist counterparts.  It protects both sets of corruption.


The US Deep State would kill anybody to stop that happening, as they did with Epstein.

The US elites are in conflict and when this happens many things are revealed.
Epstein was a casualty of this conflict, as was Weinstein...
The dominance of Jewry should tell you something.

the conflict is between those who want to continue with the neo-con - Trotskyite - plan of perpetual warfare - Biden, Democrats, Hollywood - and those who realize that decades of undermining American Caucasians - predominately WASP, Yankee culture - they fucked themselves, because opening borders allows in tribes that are a real threat to them, and now want to stop what they've begun and have cultivated for a century - the Republicans, Trump being their front-man - and these "conservative" forces are now advocating a consolidation of American power and isolationism, so as to slow down America's decline.
This realization has come too late. The process has accelerated and pressing hard on the breaks now will cause the vehicle to swerve out of control and crash.
Biden did slow down, a bit, and has not started any new wars - yet - mainly because the US can's, any longer, fight the wars nor expect the support it had in the past.
The neo-con method has been watered down and now they are trying to create regional alliances, mainly with the Anglo-Puritan, Americanized, nations, like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Britain - to share the load, i.e., resource costs, including human resources.
So, America is forced to consolidate its power, in preparation of its decline into a regional power.
Israel is worried and is now attempting to become a data security power, to compensate for the loss of the US as its frontman - controlled from the inside.
Trump admitted Israel dominated congress...and is no longer dominating mainly because of what they've done, allowing Muslim Semites into the nation...a far greater threat to Jewish dominance of the US.

When a parasite infect an host it eventually kills it, and with it it destroys itself...this is part of the cycle, because the only thing that matters is the survival of the gemes....so now replace genes with memes, viz., the survival of the ideology, dogma, is all that matters, and if bodies are sacrificed then this is part of the process. In fact, in this case, the sacrifice of bodies - genes - is part of the reproduction cycle. The meme needs to be hated and its followers sacrificed for it to survive.