A War Like No Other

Piper identifies both Buckley and Martin as "Judas goats".
The first used to subvert American Nationalism and the second to corrupt Roman Catholicism.

Watching Bjerknes analyses may help in understanding what this "apostasy from the top" might be.



Consider the superstitious dribble from the perspective of Bjerknes insights into the symbolism of Jesus and his "real identity".
Hidden in plain view, as it were, for centuries.
(relative Bjerknes vids on Hyperborea, in the corresponding Abrahamic thread, or on Bitchute on Know More News page)

Genes to memes

Memetic wars, ideological, cold, abstract, theoretical conflicts eventually spill over into the objective world and become hot, physical, tangible...real.

The memetic attack on genetics has triggered a genetic reaction.
The ideological attempt to erase reality, or to deconstruct it so as to reconstruct it according to postmodern, American, Abrahamic ideals, has triggered a real reaction.

This is the War Like no Other.
A war against postmodernism, globalization, nihilism.
A war against Americanism - [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] as Putin called it.
It is a war against hypocrisy, pretentiousness, lies. An emotional war...a psychologically demanding one because lies will always appeal, will always seduce the average mind that cars not about objective reality but only for himself, his own welfare, his own pleasures and pains.....and so if lies help him he will believe in them and become completely invested in them.
Lises are easy....hopeful, positive. They feed the monster within; comfort and sooth it, help it cope.
Truth, conversely, is hard.....sometimes hard to accept, hard to endure...

Nietzsche, Friedrich wrote:

Very few people have the courage to fully accept all that they know.

A war against the real by the ideal.
A war against traditions, culture, biology...nature.
A feminine war using feminine tactics, with feminine motives.

What does a female most desire and why?
I've analyzed in my own way.
Security, safety, to belong, stability...and nature is Flux, uncertainty, conflict, not only order but chaos.....and chaos is why they fear and are filled with anxiety, converting it to a concept they can worship and pretend that they serve, that chaos is on their side.
Power of Nil
A weapon, a tool...an opportunity for the liar to fabricate a "truth" to fill it with his own projections.

Satyr wrote:

Men are not good at lying.
Males that are good at lying have a pronounced feminine spirit.
Women are good with words, gestures, cultivating an image...

The gadfly was an ancient seed of postmodernism. See Socrates' dialogue with Meno, which was the harbinger of nihilistic truth deconstructionism.

Reason feminizes only when it loses touch with objectivity and enters the realms of purely abstract subjectivity and emotion. Reason, taken to a logical conclusion of pure theory and detachment from the external, creates minds enslaved by language barriers, subverting their very instincts. Nobility is reason given action.

One of the best rabbi clips ever [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Adam Green Know More News ️ (@Know_More_News) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

So, in the west we have a global network that will continue degrading racial, gender, ethnic distinctions promoting a system made safe for the ideology/dogma it considered an ethical pinnacle - a world made safe for all victims using the prime victim as a stadards - attracting the worlds emasculated, desperate, degenerate, those already miscegenated, those suffering from some kind of genetic dysfunction, and on the other a eastern world returning to paternalistic, authoritarian, traditional ethno-states, attracting the more masculine spirits of the world.

I don't think the west has a chance if it remains true to its own ideals because its founding principles are lies. If race and gender are, indeed, socially constructed and "all men are created equal" or can be equalized socially, then the west has an advantage. If not, then the east has an advantage, and the west - American dominion - will have to adjust its dogma or contradict it, finding clever ways to justify why it cannot abide by its own principles, which is already occurring in the US.

this dilution, regressive uniformity is destroying the US, but it can still draw from Europe what brain-power it is destroying internally.
But for how long?
Open borders, immigration form other ethnicities diluting European stocks will eventually eliminate this source leaving nothing in its place.
How will it maintain its technological advantage then?
How will it compete when it has diluted the genetic potentials it relies on?
Unless, of course, race and gender are social constructs, intelligence can be socially engineered, and diversity is truly a strength rather than a weakness.
Seeing the consequences of the American experiment....I am confident that if Americanism remains true to tis own stated values that it will collapse, and if it applies lies and pretences, as it has, then it will implode from internal strife.
Lies can only conceal the truth they cannot erase it, or replace it....and for how long?

July 2013 is when I posted this thread, and the idea goes back to the Feminization of Man, back to before 2000 - I wrote a small essay, posting it on Sciforums, back in 1999, if I remember correctly.
But let's take 2013 as my first foray.
I was talking about it before all of this bullshyte hit the fan.
This entire forum is focused on exploring the "whys" and "uoghts" and "what ifs".
I give you my analysis, my diagnosis and how I predict this disease will develop and what will be the most probable outcome...but I offer no magic medicine, no solution, because this train can't be stopped, this avalanche cannot be halted. Too late.
All I can do is offer a guide as to how it might be survived.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

From this it follows that Hebrew thinking became psychological, since psychology is concerned with us ourselves and our inner states and images. Moreover, it was of equal necessity that Greek thinking should bear the stamp of logic, since logical validity is constructed externally (objectively), independently of our psychical conditions, and for the most part it also permits of demonstration by way of diagrams, at any rate so far as the Greeks evolved it.
[Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek]

The source of our current postmodern “crisis of identity” is found in Hebrew psychology. Americanism’s ‘crisis is a by-product of its Judeo-Christian identification. What we currently consider “Americana” is Jewish fabrication that had no meaning before Hollywood and U.S. media gave it one, throughout the 20th and into the 21st century.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

…for the Hebrew the most important of his senses for the experience of truth was his hearing (as well as various kinds of feeling), but for the Greek it had to be his sight; or perhaps inversely, because Greeks were organized in a predominately visual way and the Hebrew in a predominately auditory way, each people’s conception of truth was formed in increasingly different ways.
[Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek]

Hearing is vital for the propagation of linguistically triggered concepts.
The eye can be conditioned to see what it is told it is seeing.
Sight cannot be so easily manipulated and cannot her what it is shown. Perception is sensual, including both sight and hearing, but which take precedents determines the psychological difference.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

Not only are these two languages essentially different, but so too are the kinds of images and thinking involved in them.

Kunst wrote:

This distinction goes very deeply into psychic life; the Jews themselves defined their spiritual predisposition as anti-Hellenic.
[Judisches lexicon]

Kunst wrote:

One of the reasons that the Jews produced no significant art of their own is the particular mental attitude of the Jewish people, the ‘anti-Hellenic’ in them. The genius of this people was not toward the fashioning of form, nor toward a harmonious experience of the surrounding world, but toward the legitimacy of moral activity. The Second Commandment’s prohibition of images results mainly from this orientation; this commandment would never have consistently been observed had not this mental attitude existed.
[Judisches lexicon]

[Hebrew thought Compared with Greek]

Anti-Hellenic in that they selectively adopt and corrupt portions of Hellenic thought to fabricate a negating alternative. The only ‘art’ the Jews created and became masters at was the art of the gab, the art of using words/symbols, making them consummate salesmen, politicians, poets, and preachers.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

It is quite correct and meritorious that Nygren regards the Platonic understanding of love, Eros, as the only possible basis for a comparison with the biblical-Hebraic idea of love, Agape. Platonism represents the acme of Greek intellectual life, as Nygren also thinks, and because it is religious in nature, it is quite comparable with Israelite thinking which is religious through and through.

***

…thinking of the Greeks is spatial and that of the Hebrews is temporal.
[Hebrew thought Compared with Greek]

Platonism bridges Hellenism and Judaism adopting the Greek identity of the Digenis Akritas, surviving no the border between Asia & Europe, west & east.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

Only when dynamic thinking is considered the ideal does Greek thinking appear static; once it is recognized that Greek thinking is fully the peer of Israelite thinking, an attempt must be made to give positive expressions to the antithesis from the Greek side as well. From that viewpoint Greek mental activity appears harmonious, prudent, moderate, and peaceful; to the person to whom the Greek kind of thinking occurs plainly as ideal, Hebrew thinking and its manner of expression appear exaggerated, immoderate, discordant, and in bad taste.
[Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek]

Zealotry is an Abrahamic symptom. Charlatans, selling magic snake-oils treatment to gullible minds, governed by anxiety, must become passionately hyperbolic so as to become convincing. Moderation cannot overcome lingering skepticism.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

A comparison with Plato’s philosophy is worthwhile, because the religious spirit inhering in it is most closely associated with the biblical spirit, and the ideas that come to expression through it are best able to be compared with the biblical ideas.

***

Even for Philo, the greatest mind of the Jewish Diaspora, Plato was the great teacher, and his attempt, resting on inner conviction, to unite Platonism and Judaism shows that even Jews saw and felt the spiritual kinship of Platonic and biblical ideas.
[Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek]

Judaism does this: it appropriates and absorbs all challenging ideas, warping them to fit into its presumptions. The only way it can do this is by converting language into a subjective expression of personal experience and preference – a matter of faith.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

It is thus proven beyond doubt that the Assyrians and Babylonians conceived of the divine word under the image of a physical-cosmic power.
In Egypt, the power of creating and of sustaining everything was traced back of the divine world.

***

The oldest portion of the Wisdom literature (Prov. 22.17-24.22) is an almost literal rendering of the Wisdom collection of King, Amen-em-ope, but every reference to the Egyptian gods and every motif which may not be reconciled with Jahvistic religion is either altered or expunged. Thus, for example, the divine retribution for human deeds in the after-life is changed into a retribution in this life. It is thereby established that the Israelite theologians and Wisdom teachers were able, even in the most ancient times, to pick up foreign material, consciously to rework it, and to insert it, materially adapted, into their own religion.

Connecting directly to ‘logos’ as it is currently misused by nihilist Abrahamism and ideologues.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

’Word’ and ‘deed’ are thus not two different meanings of dabhar, but the ‘deed’ is the consequence of the basic meaning inhering in dabhar.

***

The deepest level of meaning in the term ‘word’ is thus nothing which has to do with the function of speaking – neither dynamic spokenness, as was the case in the entire Orient, nor the articulateness of utterance – but the meaning, the ordered and reasonable content. The term was generally used ‘only with regard to the principle functions of the reasonable man.’

Another connection between Judaism and Christianity – evidence of ideological inheritance (memeology).

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

As the Greeks did and as we do, the Israelites determined these times with the aid of the sun, moon, and the stars (Gen. 1.14), but in a totally different way. The distinction is expressed even in the different designations for sun, moon, and stars; the Greeks called them heavenly bodies, and Plato knows that they are spherical. The Greeks therefor, first consider the form of the heavenly bodies; they observe where they are in the heavens and in that way they (and the other Indo-Europeans) determine time. The most important time determination is the sun; Christmas (25th December) and St. John’s day (Midsummer Day, 24th June), which are defined by means of the sun’s provision in the sky, are ancient Indo-Germanic festivals. These were unknown in Israel; there the holy seasons were denied with the aid of the quite variable and movable moon. The Hebrews call the heavenly bodies, lamps, me’oroth (Gen. 1.14 ff.) or lights (Ps. 136.7) both names refer to functions. Lamps and lights help us to see; they illuminate and warm.

***

We Europeans with our customary spatial mode of thinking frequently think of temporal rhythms by means of the obvious image of a circle or cycle; the reason for this is the circular movement of the sun which from time immemorial has been used for temporal orientation, since the image of the circular movement of the sun was transferred to the corresponding time. The Hebrews, however, orient themselves temporally not towards the circular movement of the sun, but toward the regular change of the moon’s phases, toward the rhythmic alternation of light and darkness, warmth and cold, as already indicated.
[Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek]

For the Judaized mind the subjective experience takes precedent over any objective independent standard.
We also see a proclivity towards second-hand reflection; appropriating and selectively deflecting light created by another, and a preference for dim-light, to conceal and mask – under moonlight all acquires a surreal appearance, all becomes mysterious where mysticism thrives upon human anxieties.
Under the sun all is clarified, distinguished, brought into focus.
This solar/lunar aspect distinguishes Hellenism from Judaism.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

For us, actions are oriented objectively, impersonally, and spatially; the Hebrews think subjectively, personally, and temporally.
[Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek]

Boman claims that the Hebrew conception of time is more accurate emphasizing the subjective experience as the only valid standard – revealing Einstein’s Theory of Relativity as being a consequence of his Hebraic conception of time/space, rather than space/time.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

The classical culture, elaborated by Plato, Aristotle and the stoics, is a western and intellectual version of a universal type of ahistorical spirituality.
[Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek]

Without the Greeks there would be no sciences – founded on empiricism and the logical evaluation of data.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

The Greeks have given the world the science of history; the Israelites gave the world historical religion. In contrast to all their neighbours, both peoples knew what history is; this is no consequence of their mental giftedness, for there is another reason.
[Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek]

Hebrew contributions remain within the fields of religion and ethics.
 

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

In Greek antiquity the discovery of new material was the business of the poet only to a limited degree; even Shakespeare used without hesitation already existent material in his dramas. Nor did the originality of the Israelite thinker lie in stylistic reworking of material. Even in this field the Hebrews were apparently devoid of ambition; so far as the form was materially useful they allowed the words and expressions of the authors to remain undisturbed. If those words and expressions came into conflict with Israelite religion, morality, or a kind of thinking, the material was partly reworked, partly expunged, partly expanded and partly reshaped. In the clarity with which this was seen and in the rigour with which it was carried out lies one of the most essential accomplishments of Israelite thinkers and writers.
[Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek]

This “reworking of material” defines and describes the essence of parasitism, perfectly describing all three Abrahamic spiritual variants and explaining their longevity across the ages of man.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

Perhaps we can between understand the formal difference in the thinking of the two peoples if we try to answer the question: what do they mean by truth? For the Greeks truth, negatively expressed, is that which is unveiled (αληθής=a-privation+λήθης=’hidden’; cf.  λανθάνω), therefore, that which is revealed, clear, evident, or that which is to be seen clearly. The positive expression for ‘true’ is connected in Indo-European languages with the notion of being:
The primitive German form *santha from IE *sont, present participle of the root *es-‘be’ (Greek εων, ων – ‘being’ Form *esont, cf. Sanskrit  sant- ‘being (adj.), good, true’), AS sith; in the Nordic languages the root is well attested: sann – ‘true’; the German word for ‘true’ (wahr) is one which made its way from the south and replaced in Anglo-Saxon the older soth.

***

The corresponding Hebrew concept of truth is expressed by means of derivatives of the verb ‘aman – ‘to be steady, faithful’; ‘amen – ‘verily, surely’; ‘omen – ‘faithfulness’; ‘umnam – ‘really’; ‘emeth – ‘constancy, trustworthiness, certainty, fidelity to reported facts, truth’; cf. ‘omenah – ‘pillar, door, post’. In short, the Hebrews really do not ask what is true in the objective sense but what is subjectively certain, what is faithful in the existential sense; therefore, it is not what is in agreement with impersonal objective being that interests them, but what is in agreement with the facts that are meaningful for them. This shows that Hebrew thought is directed toward events, living, and history in which the question of truth is of another sort than in natural science. In such matters the true is the completely certain, sure, steady, faithful.
[Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek]

A plausible source of present-day inter-subjectivity leading to our American ‘crisis of identity’.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

Greek thinking is clear logical knowing; Israelite thinking is deep psychological understanding.
[Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek]

A difference corresponding to the development of gene to meme inverted to meme to gene – psychological source of all defensive dogmas and ideologies based on the social motive of individual safety within a collective, a herd.
A fact that explains its seductive power over the masses; its popularity and historical persistence.

Boman, Thorlei wrote:

From this it follows that Hebrew thinking necessarily becomes psychological, since psychology is concerned with us ourselves and our inner states and images. Moreover, it was of equal necessity that Greek thinking should bear the stamp of logic, since logical validity is constructed externally (objectively), independently of our psychical conditions, and for the most part it also permits of demonstration by way of diagrams...

***

…for the Hebrew the most important of his senses for the experience of truth was his hearing (as well as various kinds of feeling), but for the Greek it had to be his sight…
[Hebrew Thought Compared with Greek]

Predators are defined by their primary reliance on sight, and herd species by their primary reliance on hearing, as an early-warning system. We also notice the connection of hearing with linguistic grooming, at a distance.
Hunters rely, primarily, on sight; the hunted on sound.

*In a feminized world hearing dominates social conventions, sharing group dynamics, shared interests.
And if you are told not to trust your sight, your Hellenic eyes, because what you see is not what ‘is,’ but, in fact, is the opposite of what ‘is,’ you must heed, you must listen, obey the calling, discipline yourself to what is communicated.

*Language begins as a form of vocal (oral) communication – used by the hunted alerting them of a hunted; its primary role is to communicate physical distress, including libidinal.

Boman, Thorleif wrote:

For us, actions are oriented objectively, impersonally, and spatially; the Hebrews think subjectively, personally, and temporally.

How could Marxism, and postmodernism not have been the product of Hebraic minds?
Frankfurt schoolers.
Neo-Cons, Trotskyites, Strausseans.

They defined what Americanism now is.
Messianic.
"Liberating" mankind from its past, allowing every individual to reinvent himself, like a god, from nowhere and nothing.

Their zealotry is dangerous. Immersed in their superstitions concerning their choseness, they may choose to realize their own prophesies, rather than endure them being exposed as what they've always been: a ruse, a con, a lie.
Look at how panicked they've become because of Russia's challenge of their hegemony.

Who do you bet on? China has maximum racial homogeneity, eugenics, and cultural belonging -- whereas America is a nation of rootless mongrels with a homosexualized White male elite psychologically subservient to Jews, and enthralled by Black music. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Dr. Ricardo Duchesne (@dr_duchesne) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

War and conflict in all its forms, like pain and suffering in all its forms, sharpens psycho-spiritual motives and perspectives, towards what matters and what is meaningful.

Or is it just more of this?[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Antidotal (@JohnFMiller86) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

It is a war on nature, on human nature....using shame to impose rules that will make men self-censoring, self-repressing....reducing the necessity for overt authoritarianism. Totalitarianism internalized.

In one of the largest rallies in support of Serbia by Russians since 1999, hundreds cruise through Moscow streets to show their solidarity [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— RT (@RT_com) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This
This is a war between traditional values and nihilism, using semiotics to manipulate human vanity and exploit human stupidity.
Those nation-states with no ethnic backbone, no sense of ethnic and/or biologically based identity, find themselves confronted by Americanized nihilism and its abstractions, attracting/seducing all those who feel animosity and resentment towards their biological limitations and towards their inheritance - most of which, being miscegenated, have no clear sense of identity, finding it on the market place, or in ideological constructs with no external referents.

They have no clue what is going on or why.
They are predicting a systemic collapse, equating America's monetary monarchy with the entire 'world'.
One of them, towards the end, predicts civil wars in all nations, and then mentions only those under Americanism's dominion, because there is no internal social conflicts within those that remain on the periphery - despite the US's decade long attempts to create and exploit social rifts to exploit and rape their natural and human resources.

All there is is empire collapse, showing internal fragmentations.
The end of an empire is like the end of the world for those that were born and raised within its principles and world view - all these individuals that had taken certain things for granted and are now beginning to lose trust in everything they believed was absolutely true, i.e., are realizing that the empire was fabricated and founded, from its inception, on lies, and little else.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Shannon Crawford (@shae33172) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Girls and little boys - men-children - don't understand hybrid warfare.
In their simple minds there's an easy binary bouncing around...good vs. evil.
The good can do not evil, and the evil can do no good.
There's no nuance, no subtlety in their dualistic minds.

What feels good, is good; what feels bad is evil. Trigger these sensations, these feelings and you have them trapped.
A trigger word will suffice...
Pavlovian training, using rewards, affection, a bely rub, a treat,...a hug...or a slap, a bite, a scream...creating associations they will never forget.
Manimals.....simple, easy to analyze...requiring no objectivity at all....entirely emotional, subjective....sympathy or antipathy.
Love or Hate.
We must keep this in mind about the majority: the dimwits and midwits... canon fodder, sheeple lead to slaughter by Judas goats....
These are the simpletons who bleed for causes they cannot fully comprehend....these are the pawns on the chess board of Geopolitics.
Impressionable, emotional, naïve, gullible....easily exploited and manipulated...easily brainwashed and indoctrinated.

Their world is simple...black and white.
Their enemies are always incomprehensible monsters....projecting into them their vilest fantasies, their most subconscious fears and anxieties.
They learn history like they learn fairy tales....noble benevolent white knights versus evil inhuman dark brutes...rescuing innocent damsels in distress...

“It is time to admit it aloud: we are already at full-blown war with NATO. It is no longer even about Western ‘iron’ in the hands of Ukrainian meat or intelligence supplied to them from day one straight from the Pentagon.”[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— pocalypsis pocalypseos 🅉 (@apocalypseos) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This is Italy’s new Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni.

I’ve never heard any politician so perfectly explain what we’re up against and why we fight.

When you watch this video, you’ll quickly realize why the establishment is afraid of her.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

and this trope, repeated most often by desperate degenerates with no family ties, of 'living in your mother's basement - is another attack on family ties and values.
Notice that these degenerate parrot "mother's basement" not "father's basement" which would be more probable, because this shames males more, and you never see them attacking women using the line "you live in your father's basement" through i know many women who have returned back to their parental home because of economic issues.
I know one who is living with her mother, in a condo, after she got divorced...

But this is parroting by uncreative imbeciles....like "you have a small dick" or "Cheetos eating" not Doritos, repeated like a poem...
What do women attack in males when they want to hurt him?
They attack his manhood, his sexual potency, his sexual options...

This is not a war between Russia and the US, or capitalism against communism, but a war in defence of culture - whatever culture you belong to - and non-culture; between realism and idealism; between family values and degeneracy...
The fact that Russia is now in open warfare with those forces of nihilism is entirely incidental; the fact that China is one of the power fighting back, is entirely irrelevant.
Due to historical reasons they are the only noes that could have stood up to the filth the US is selling as "liberty."

Islam was fighting it for decades with little success....they lacked the means and the unity to put up a fight, and in the end became pawns to be manipulated by those that had both the means and the unity to do so.

.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]
Always look into their bio.
Some have changed their names to make them sound more like the host nation's - krypsis.
Find there a pattern.
Then look into why this pattern exists, viz., what are tis roots, its foundations, its method, strategy, motive.....
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
No organized conspiracy is necessary when the dogma itself contains the programming, the plan, just as cells do not require a centralized organizing authority but act in accordance to their innate genetic programming.
Well, this is memetic programming.
They don't know what they react in the ways they do, it is part of their world-view, their ideological, dogmatic impulse...their convictions.
It is all automated.

No conscious awareness is required.
It has been ingrained into the mind after decades of training, edumacation...

Know Thyself

Waiting on....Kalki.

On one hand, this is a War Like No Other, because of the exponential increases in sophistication of propaganda and mind-manipulating techniques, Commercialization of (Anti-)Culture, and Demoralization and Subversion (Yuri Bezmenov)....

On the other hand, this War has been waging for thousands of years as the Semite slave-religions brought their craft and "Art" to Europe through the door of Constantinople, the focal point of every invasion into the interior of Evropa.  Greeks and Hellenism were the first major blockades of this spread historically.  The Slave-Dialectics could not pass through the Greek Agora, where Hellenic culture and tradition of "war of ideas" exposed them at every turn.  In such an honest light, the Semites could not 'hide' their intentions, and thus the roots of their ideologies.  These desert-dwellers peddling trinkets and knick-knacks, offered nothing of interest other than fantastical fantasies of a "One God", pretender of the Null God.  Thus the early Semites (called "Jews" today) idealized the Greeks and Hellenes whom they could not trespass...at first.

It wasn't until a long passage of time that Semitic religion realized its full power and potential -that- their power is in patience and centuries of waiting.  Their Nihilistic art and culture does not seep into a healthy and vibrant host, but a dying and decaying one.  Thus they waited in the catacombs and 'ghettos' of the Roman Republic, lost and intermeshed within the crowds of the Bazaars, expressing themselves during the lulls of sleep and deaths of Host cultures, each time adapting their spreadability and seductivity--pornography, drugs/"medicine", dentistry, blending into one nation after another after another, with no real, true, or significant political 'Nationalism'.  This is the essence of "Anti-Semitism" and Anti-Nationalism.  The ideal of a racial/ethnic homogeneity, which resists their intrusion, is Anathema.

When these desert-dwellers sufficiently integrated themselves into the Roman Empire, their intermarriages to the Roman Elite lead to the fusion of Roman-ism with Semitism, producing "Abrahamism", Catholicism, Christianity, Orthodoxy, and Nihilism in general, the Catholic tradition being the most successful and 'preserving' the European (Hellenic) spirit across time.  This is a lesson the Germans still have not learned to this day.  While the German tribes of Central Europe hoped for a violent rejection of Abrahamism, the Hellenic method has proved most successful--allow the battle of ideals to commence, because in Philosophy, the dark motives and lies are always exposed, eventually, through the light of Apollo.

The desert-dwellers cannot hide in the Greek Agora.

Philosophy was the first, and maybe the final, Antidote, to Abrahamic Lies / Dogma / Postmodern Politicking.