Once it was the prerogative of healthy fathers to set trials and initiations for his children and tests that oversee the child's maturity by bidding them to Dare and venture forth in the world, and mothers were protective nurturers and care-givers and soul-expanders, shaping minds in-spiring with their spirit and bold stories, and teaching them not to talk with strangers and such conservatism. Modern laws have inverted roles, where today, the average-masculinized women let children out into the world with no accompanying discipline that male trials involved,, to transfer their own feminist dreams onto the next generation - "things they were prevented from doing", while the few embody that role with the accompanying discpline, to re-ignite the last rays of all the heroic men they revere, and men preserve the last impressions of all the pragmatic women they revere and become teachers of caution.
Modern laws that are partial to feminists, disallow males to set daring trials for children, in this culture of easy victimhood. A small scratch would get you sued for negligence or parental abuse and accompanying punishments. Such pressure, moulds specific type-sets of not only male and female range of expression, but also the format of current counter-culture philosophy in general. In such a climate, noting the mixing up of the mother-preserving man, from the feminized narcissistic-paranoid male requires a keen alertness.
You can Bet the male who experiences culture and cultural reticence/reti-Sense - the strength of restraint, and discriminate taste, as Fear or repression or compensatory shortcoming, is a narcisstic-paranoid response to his own weak self-coherence.
The weakly-integrated fear nature, and this fear of the 'Dionysian' translates to feeling over-powered by the Black Goddess, an awe of black dicks, that now become the personal yardstick of measuring another's sexual vitality. Culture distaste and reserve, registers among NPs as an artificial meme, a 'construct', a piece of unnaturalness…
As this thread has been, this trend has gone viral now.
Consider the NP involved in social 'experiments', when Everyone is a social Scientist 'observing and measuring response' from silly pranks to the most shock and awe surprises, "extracting truth and Objectivity" in realtime response to indecencies of anything-goes.
Consider the NP involved in thought 'experiments', when Everyone is an Artist, 'true to reality', that can be used to justify not only flaming provocations in the name of 'to rip the mask underneath and getting to the bottom', but also the self-compensating vanity of 'bringing the hidden repressed in another'… Any self-flattery to feel good about oneself, how one 'helped bring out the other'… How true Art is… How 'clever' and 'sincere' the Artist is, to depict life "as it is",,, it was 'nothing personal' of course. Such reservation of 'impersonal objectivity' by the flamer relative to the 'emotional response' of the inflamed, is of course pre-set, and nothing could be more symptomatic of Hedonistic-nihilism than this.
Nothing could be more Xt. than this underlying "will to truth" at any costs of endless tests in the garb of science and art that drives NP Objectivists;
George Orwell, not withstanding.
Saying the truth in times of deceit is deceiving, when culture, that is organically cultivated taste to the widest pressures and self-discipline, is aggressively, dishonestly, and categorically twisted, inverted, and bullied and sullied as an unnatural construct, just because the path of maximum resistance was not for everybody.
If modern nihilism pertains to the feminization of mankind, then modern hedonism pertains to the Fear of feminization of mankind.
Narcissistic-Paranoia is the un-coagulation, the un-clotting of matter holding together for any stable duration.
No culture is possible without the basis of a durable, sturdy material, a spirit able to not just weather, but actively Will life in its greatest and painful aspects.
Continued association with females resulting in an entropic equilibrium of "happy means" and "average" personality is only the tip of the iceberg. The danger of entropic equilibrium applies equally in continuous association with hyper-males, and those of NP moralities, that stunt the excess spirit of exceptional individuals. Continuous association with such NP types can be spiritually crippling.
Solitude, discriminate association, independence of spirit, necessary to BOTH males AND females, and such self-culturing is one matter, but,
going through life, keeping one foot in the door, and one foot exit stage, with "cherishable" moments and such pleasure trophies is the path of weaklings and hedonists, INCapable of valuing their own selves to the fullest, let alone forming relationships with others, or dialogues with life.
Preaching about the fear of nature and the feminine as something corruptible bringing down males is only half the story.
Lets talk of the fear of fear of nature, that is even more corruptible, producing stunted souls and discoherent selves, crippled and incapacitated from aiming anything beyond its safe comfort and pleasure.
Is it such a pollution associating with females?
And who shall speak of the pollution in associating with hyper males?
"I can't spend more than an hour with you,, I might end up like you" can only be the paranoid concern of princess personas and hyper-males with poor self-trust.
No, this isn't life.
No, this isn't the only definition of a mean, no matter how much weaklings would wish to convince, projecting their own fear and fragility. Mean as Only meaning "mediocrity" is the safe-word of NPs,,, Mean also is the "golden mean" of perfect balance, discipline, focus, mind-fulness, nature's own selectivity of "optimal" features... The "golden ratio" is a harmonious mean, "best fit" found throughout nature from flowers to shells to other thriving forms...
Weaklings filled with shame of their weakness, spread and inculcate shame and poison of fear, rather than the advocacy of strong spirituality and exalted hearts that Will to keep both foot in, through thick and thin, gain and loss, pain and pleasure.
The time we give to others is precious, the time we spend with others is far more so, retards notwithstanding.
Two individuals in-sync do not necessarily always become mediocre,,, but they may also attain a higher resonance, sending out a deeper vibration into space/time, the gravituous pulse of a shared synchronous vision.
That soldiers marching together form a drone of feminized hive-minds is one mindset,,, soldiers marching together have birthed a timeless culture out to eternity is another mindset, a loftier mindset in my view.
Saving yourself pristine from being exploited any which way definitely translates to death and is no escape from it. Apples rot from inside when stashed away for long. Avoiding worms from without do not prevent the worms growing from within. As that old saying goes, cowards die many times before their eventual death.
Complexity of a FULL, well-Rounded, comprehensive life is for the daring few.
The Romanticist's experience of freedom is untrammeled space free of obstructions, like a clear blue sky. The hyper-male imagines the ideal of his spirit as endless as that. And in such a case, anyone's acceptance of him is Made to imply his being 'controlled', cast in borders, in frame - for being accepted as 'such and such'. His own need to constantly perform, to reinforce his need to believe he is free, is projected upon others who must bear the brunt of 'manipulating' him, 'controlling' him, 'needing him to perform' 'forcing him to live upto an ideal',,, when the ideal and the NP itch to perform is his own.
Exactly which laws are you referring to here? Different countries have different laws, even different legal practises.
Unless you are the last to hear of feminization, I mean laws and institutions that distinctly promote and cultivate a feminine spirit irrespective of gender, "co-operative" males tamed not to disturb the smooth functioning of the 'civil' system, and any sign of aggression safe-spaced to accommodate the whims of the victim... such modern laws and the culture of fragility.
^^ You missed my point, or are evading my critical questions on purpose. Exactly which laws, and which countries are you referring to? The actual §§ and a couple of relevant examples, please.
Impulso Oscuro
Gender : Posts : 796 Join date : 2013-12-10 Age : 33 Location : Praxis
^^ You missed my point, or are evading my critical questions on purpose. Exactly which laws, and which countries are you referring to? The actual §§ and a couple of relevant examples, please.
Do you know what "Modern" refers to, or are you engaging in hyperskepticism on purpose.
"Modern" is usually represented by (but is not limited to) the western 1st world countries that have embraced many of the "enlightenment" ideals such as "freedom", "justice", and "equality" and whom seek to spread the dominion of their ideals over the entire Earth.
Of course, these ideals are selectively enforced, because they can never exist in reality.
The most prominent example is the United States.
If were talking about feminization, we can look at
-The 19th Amendment (Women's right to vote) Which effectively reduced the power men had over politics by introducing the female vote, and producing a voting block which would need to be pandered to differently than men. This cascades into dealing with "issues" such as Violence/War, Welfare, and Education. These are only "issues" for women because they do not see the long term benefit of maintaining violence/war (a means for men to express themselves and remain strong), No Federal Welfare (Forces people to depend on communities and develop a work ethic), Limited Education (Allows for parents (specifically men) to remain a relevant influence in their child's upbringing.
All of these "problems" for women have been solved through: "Stricter" law enforcement(not strict in punishment but strict in the quantity of laws) (The law book is several times larger than it was in the past) Federal Welfare A longer and "more diverse" curriculum.
More law enforcement reduces the need for boys to defend and stand up for themselves which results in a weaker male. Federal Welfare develops an entitlement mentality which demands for its needs to be met, which results in a desire to eliminate all work from existence. A longer and "more diverse" curriculum makes kids more dependent upon the state for their history and ideals effectively eliminating the family tradition.
All of these qualities, weakness, entitlement, and abandonment of tradition have historically been attributed to female behavior through their weaker bodies, entitlement of resources and time for their children, and adopting a husband's or invading tribe's traditions instead of maintaining her own.
This is feminization, which is not limited to boys but is accentuated on them because they are not girls.
_________________ Once more, with knowing.
The meek shall inherit the Earth, but the Noble shall take it.
Cult_Leader
Gender : Posts : 41 Join date : 2017-04-27 Age : 47 Location : Scandinavia
Ok, this makes sense to me. But the laws and legal practises of other countries, Modern or not, are still different. A legal manifestation of thought in one country could be illegal in another country and vice versa.
^^ You missed my point, or are evading my critical questions on purpose. Exactly which laws, and which countries are you referring to? The actual §§ and a couple of relevant examples, please.
and you can watch the film inspired by [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] I think:
The original paper by Satyr on Feminization can be found [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and on domestication [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.].
-
If the ill-effect of postmodernity is Narcissistic-Schizophrenia run amok by uninhibited subjectivity and all that Baudrillard's simulacra pointed out of rootless words, that of modernity is a Narcissistic-Paranoia by unrestrainable objectivity and en-Grave-d wor(l)ds, producing debilitated weak-hearted 'individuals' too a-trophied to even keep two feet together; always one foot in, one foot out. When to be cultured is felt as an exhaustion, and commitments are felt as an oppression, and one treats words and oaths as garments, the fabric of all relations come apart, including one's own sense of self-coherence. There is an endless regression of disappointment-and-pain-avoiding hedonistic double-checking and triple-checking, till one ends up eating one's own trust in oneself. And this has paralyzing consequences to create anything enduring as a future. The mere sight of seeing someone you relate to being happy, makes you paranoid that you are being 'exploited', 'controlled', 'manipulated', and ends in cost/benefit demands of compensation for one's own inadequacy and resignation that all Must be flawed, and if not, must be Pushed till it becomes flawed, to feel relief from the only familiarity of chaos-worship that makes one feel secure.
Objectivity was meant to be a tool and a means, and not an ends in itself. I think the NP culture of "double agents" and "doppelgängers" and the cold-war ethical/existential dilemmas of the 'limits of exploring knowledge and sleeping with the enemy' has its origins in the J.-Xt. myth of Eve and the snake, the fall, the tree of knowledge and the tree of life... that I haven't written about yet.
Without daring, philosophical ideals of honour and love and nobility and the heart to posit ideals itself is increasingly cocooned within one's hedonistic limitations, an anaemia of the spirit lacking the iron-will, and dwindling into nothingness, an abyss of safety and comfortable familiarity.
Without a-Spiration, the Spire of life itself is coming undone.
We are decelerating.
On the outside is the matrix, on the inside, we are in Limbo.
Limbo/Mobil - false sense of mobility and passage of time that can feel like an eternity; one feels 'safe' in this safe-zone of avoiding death interminably, staying suspended in ...[watching {the watching (the watching...)}]... unceasing 'anchoring' or empty self-clinging that can only be assured by relentless paranoia and more watching...
Hedonism is a war at the very roots of identity and existence.
Freud related paranoia to latent homosexuality as in the ability to only let in what is familiar, what is alike, and then turn on it as well... the persecutory narcissistic-neurosis of the delicate self on mistrustful hyperguard. At the cultural level, the reduction of everything to what is self-same, containing the exploration of things to one's own limits, the erasure of nature, the vital unconscious and the feminine itself to masculine ideals as if the feminine were inherently defective, as though both do not have their own approaches to order, is symptomatic of a similar Homo-geneity - the Homogenous Man, a Uni-form world, a Levelling of mis-fits. A culture of increasing homosexuals in an increasingly homogenous world.
The term 'Safe-sex' means something altogether different here among homos. 'That which is self-same is Safe and so will not hurt me'...
If on the one hand, we observe female-drones of This cultural milieu who direct men into ideals they then judge Un-fit,, we also observe men-slaves and Mis-fits who harbour hatred and disgust at the sight of anything feminine and must render it masculine, bring out their "spunk", that they then condemn sluttish, transgressive and deceitful.
Mis-fits who lack self-trust, find in feminine submission, as equally as, in their free-spirited spunk, that they themselves incite, a villain to play the victim; in the reflection of their own shame and weakness to command, a mockery of dangerous nature, and the NP self-centering continues. To gel into a self by finding any cause to attack, a cause one farcically creates.
The weak rightfully see Nature as an agent of (their) destruction, and the feminine is repelled and re-Vile-d as an "unfortunate" necessity. In fighting against monsters, one usually becomes a monster oneself. One becomes feminine oneself. The hyper-male, the mis-fit, the victim, is an effete.
At bottom these are hedonistic romanticists, let down by nature who "should have" produced complementary pleasure, beauty and sensibility everywhere... The romanticist is idyllistic at heart. Vindictive ressentiment is eventual and inevitable, and is the mark of such mis-fits.
The autonomy of the hedonistic homogenous man, is tied with the idea of Convenience.
Like convenience stores, words are market-commodities, where frauds may use them to imply effects when convenient, and declare words are words and amount to nothing when convenient. This is the mis-fit's idea of freedom, of being 'in control'. But the sub-conscious sheaths can't be tricked, and such fake posturing of 'rational' autonomy come to haunt as seeing enemies and competitors out there, as paranoid persecutions, which make the need to be 'more clever' to 'outwit nature', forever perpetuate this vicious cycle of increasing effeteness.
The attack and curtailing of what is foreign, where foreign now means that which is not self-same or homogenous, and where self means the 'limits of my comfort', in contemporary academic circuits and SJWs protests, ANTIFA, etc. is evidence of this.
Xenos is now Nature itself.
Alienation from nature and natural expressions of the unconscious, now renders Xenophobia - the fear and hatred of the foreign, of that which is different from self-same homogeneity as directed at nature itself.
PC machinary and the Victim Industry docked and flourished on the victim rhetoric of homosexual being the 'Other', and Xenophobia - fear of the 'Other' as a sign of one's own latent homosexuality.
But we make this ill-logic come full circle. The homosexual and homogenous agenda is a xenophobia of self-nature. A de-naturing self-alienation.
Homosexuality is not Same-sex marriage, but Safe-sex marriage.
The moral objectivist like cAnus who attacks any 'Other' as a threat while at the same time advocating democrazy plainly demonstrates NP Homogeneity in his Xenophobia. What this Safe-sexual craves is a hive-mind majority, a homogenous thinking.
The NP age of Auto-Immune-Defiency-Syndrome and the infection FROM Safe-sex.
