Mind of Morons

If I convert my mind to words, numbers, or any representational code, and then blow my brains out, then my mind continues to exists, in the whole, even though my brain is in pieces.

Love, the idea, exists independently from minds, i.e., consciousness, just as value, or hatred, or will, because mind is universal and I but a conduit of its divinity, yet I remain convinced that I am an atheist.

Reality does not exist unless I agree that it exists, therefore I remain immune to all descriptions of reality where sex, and race exist, but I cannot remain immune to a reality where mortality or gravity exists.

Consequences are optional.

Can't tell the difference between a dream and what's real.
Unable to define the difference.
It must be the same.

The absolute exists, one way or another. Now prove me wrong or prove me right.

Universal morality exists, and if it doesn't universal immorality reigns.
I can think of no other option.

Don't just prove something beyond a reasonable doubt, prove it absolutely, completely, and finally, or I will unreasonably doubt it all.

The possibility that something may be true, makes it true; the possibility that something mat be untrue makes it untrue.
I have no mind for probabilities.

If in my mind I can flip reality around, sideways, and every which way I want, then of what use is reality to my mind?

If I am in pain, and suffering terribly, I automatically deserve sympathy, and you have no right to criticize or judge my behavior, because i suffer, and I have the right to claim I suffer more than anyone else, because I suffer.

I am human, I breath air and take up space in existence. Therefore, I'm entitled to everyone's unconditional respect, generosity and charity and attention.

If I am protected from the consequences of my judgements, and subsequent choices, then I can easily deny objective reality, therefore I demand to be protected to remain free, while denying freedom, altogether, to conceal my motive.
My morality is the even distribution of consequences, so I can remain subjectively oblivious.

Consequences are harder to ignore than theories, therefore I must remain theoretical while I pretend to be interested in pragmatic applications of ideas.
My method will always fabricate excuses to justify my refusal to define and to refer my theories to experiential data, outside manmade environmental circumstances where human institutions intervene and adjust the severity of consequences.

All will be reduced to a moral question, if by "moral" we mean Abrahamic moral standards.

My senses deceive me, unlike any other life form, because I can say "no", whereas other life forms cannot.
Therefore, I am exempt from all sensuality when it contradicts my ideology because I can say "no, it does not apply to me".
Logos remains my god, even though I've refused religion - my self contradiction is part of my paradoxical, mysterious/mystical, complicated/sophisticated, self-deceptive divinity. I call it "universal determinism".
Logos distinguishes me as divinely determined, i.e., chosen, to be other than the physically tangible; I am spirit, though I can use any word I so desire, as it has also been determined - ordained - for me to do so.

I am not as I appear to be, neither is the world as it appears to be.
All is not only other than it appears to be but it is the exact opposite.
Appearances are deceptive,
This apparent contradiction only applies to those who appear to be like me, in their apparent use of language.
In this case appearances are not deceptive.

The criterion? Psychological desire; physical need.

Apparently, emotion has replaced reason in my mind.
I so desire/need to make this a universal standard.

The sequential wording of "Will to Power" has been inverted to "Power of Will".
"Will" refers to the one-god, and Nietzsche's "will to power" describes an approach toward god, in agreement with Abrahamic traditions.
In secular forms, e.g., Marxism, postmodernism, the term "power" refers to the collective, i.e., humanity.

The collective, i.e., humanity, protects me from the consequences of my subjective errors in judgment, therefore the collective replaces the one-god, permitting me to remain blissfully naïve and innocently ignorant of my own quality of mind.
It follows that I will be convinced that all men are born equal.

All appearances are superficial, unless my life is on the line.

Mysteriously what is true concerning vision is not so for any other sense.

Objectivity = absolute certainty.
Since any positive absolute is illusory, e.g., omnipotence, omniscience, godliness, immutability, immortality etc. absolute negativity, i.e., absolute uncertainty, is "certain", e.g., ignorance, powerlessness, lack of agency (free-will), mutability, mortality, impotence.
I worship the certainty of uncertainty; I worship the absoluteness of an absent absolute; I worship the nil: immorality, meaninglessness, purposelessness, godlessness.
I am the Last Man.

I believe in Evolutionary Theory just not in intermediate stages, because I've incorporated Creationism into my scientific convictions and I now believe man, and only man, evolved suddenly and out of nowhere, as if by divine plan...but I'm an atheist.
My confusion is evidence of my open-mindedness.

If a person dresses as a policeman, then he is a policeman. If a person dresses as a doctor, then he is a doctor. If a person dresses as a woman, then he is a woman.

Authorities should be trusted without question, especially when they contradict themselves.

The Iraq War II was justified because Saddam Hussein had Weapons of Mass Destruction.

The US Government has improved significantly since George W. Bush, apologized, changed their ways, are more honest now, and things are looking better.

When it comes to corporations, businesses, and governments, the people matter, not money and profit margins. If a doctor receives huge salary bonuses and gifts for advertising and selling pharmaceuticals, like the vaccine, then I know they are good for my health and I should take them.

In a racially and culturally diverse environment, like America, I know that I can trust strangers more than my own kin.

Justice is based on equality of outcome. If there is inequality, then the system is unjust and must be destroyed.