Harsh Truths

Freyja wrote:

Satyr wrote:

Quote :

So, if we adjust this to the question: why are there no women chess payers that are grand masters,..

..
I answered......
The Harsh Truth is, there are 39 female players who have been awarded the title of Grandmaster, the highest lifetime

In this particular response you appear to have no concern about not using precise information and I believe nobody would have corrected you on this point.
This was the reason I thought it appropriate to do so, irrespective of the fact that truth is one of the central subjects in philosophy. 

Satyr wrote:

You can build your beliefs on the exception, I'll build mine on the rule.

"Truth" is a range, not a singularity.
There are no singularities, like there is no one-god of Abraham, or a 'one' at all.

When we say 'men are stronger than women' we don't mean you cannot find females that are stronger than the average male.
Creativity is not a female thing, because females do not challenge the status quo, but study it to preserve or enhance it.

Why do humans always identify with the victim?
Why do humans feel the need to purify the victim, absolve it of all responsibility, of all culpability, off all participation in its own fate?
Is not a predator/prey dynamic a dance of judgements and choices across a fluctuating stage of space/time possibilities - each adjusting the probabilities, in their favour, until a final outcome is reached?

Who does man feel victimized by?
The unknown. The uncertain.

Once more....gender is not a social construct - neither is race.
Gender is how reproductive specialization - sex - is applied within a culture.
Gene/Meme
Gene = male/female sexual identity with a specific reproductive role.
Meme = gender - application of male/female identity within a particular socioeconomic and cultural range.

Paglia: film > academic theory. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— CamillePagliaQuotes (@PagliaQuotes) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The inherent aggression necessitating intoxication, the selective exclusionary nature of sexual selection, its participation in natural selection, the sexual disparity between the genders, the devastating rejection of 90% of males, the inherent deception in sexual seduction, etc.

It is futile despising diseases, such as the flu. It is useless to despise and become angry at a disease.
Your hatred of it will not protect you from its effect; your anger will not make you more resilient.

But what if there were a disease, of a different kind, that becomes empowered by being hated, because it is preserved and distinguished by it - within cosmic multiplicity - preventing it from being diluted and absorbed; would not hating this kind of mental disease not make its effect upon you worsen?
Without being presumptuous, we can suspect this was Nietzsche antithesis to German hatred towards the dogmatic and ideological diseases inflicting, in his time and to the present, when this disease has all but destroyed them.

And what if said dis-ease had been adopted by a parasite that saw in its psychosomatic effects - its symptoms - a potential to exploit for its own benefit, establishing a symbiotic relationship with it, redefining health - inverting it completely - to accommodate its acceptance and adoption of the disease as its weapon?
What if this parasite saw the effects of the disease - let us call it nihilism - as an opportunity to infiltrate - saw in its effect/symptoms, on those who reject and fight it, a weakness they could exploit?
Would not such a symbiont not gain an advantage by spreading this mental dis-ease, not wasting any opportunity to inject it in every host it came across?

What then would be the way to combat such a duplicitous and clever disease, adaptive to even being despised and scorned; its strength multiplied by being attacked?
Know the disease is a necessary preliminary step; understanding how it infiltrates, multiplies and imposes itself upon an organism, is the next step; fighting the disease on its level, is the third.
One cannot become entirely immune to physical and mental diseases but one can become more resistant; invigorating one's own autoimmune system to be able to fight it, and one's own will to tolerate it for as long as it takes to go through its reproductive cycles, before it is flushed out of the system, as it always has been, and always will, because the disease can only survive in a host which it gradually kills, unless it is flushed out, time and time again - its every adaptation requiring a new cycle of battles.

Every dogma/ideology has a psychology that attract specific kinds of individuals, with overt and covert motives - most of which are unknown to them - [see know Thyself]
We call this subjectivity, and how the individual is limited by his/her intellect, his/her perceptual acuity, his/her upbringings, his/her courage and all psychosomatic traits, and his/her motives.
Objectivity is the motive to free oneself from all that, and to apply reason, unaffected by all emotional and psychological factors, to perceive the world as it is.

Ergo, objectivity is to subjectivity what omnipotence is to strength/power, and what omniscience is to knowledge/understanding, i.e., an ideal as an objective that can only be approached - achieved in degree - but never fully realized.
Here Hellenic asceticism versus Abrahamic or Buddhist asceticism - nihilistic ascetic ideal - must be sued at o contrast a difference between means and ends, viz., Hellenic, or Heathen, asceticism is a means, whereas Abrahamic and Buddhist asceticism, being nihilistic - inverting all - is an end.

Hypergamy.

All genetic.
Schizophrenia - confusion - commences when social status (memes) contradict or are contradicted by physical markers, (genes).
Women are confused.
they start, in their youth, more attuned to their genetic intuitions, but as they mature and have bad experiences with their innate impulses, they shift to more pragmatic markers, their rational intuitions.
This shift is what women call "finding themselves."

Yet, this shift condemns them to a lifetime of misery and confusion.
They remain unhappy, either when they are attracted to a male that will never remain true to them - will be untrustworthy - or a man they do not really find attractive.
That's when they start blaming males, because they do not understand why they are so unhappy, or why they are constantly disappointed.

it is like when 'affirmative action' and years of anti-race propaganda failed to produce equity.
The idealists will never identify the source of his disappointment, his/her error.
He will always accuse something, or someone else.
The ideal that 'race is a social construct" - along with gender - will never be doubted.
His skepticism will always be directed outward. the world will be the constant source of his disappointment; the world will fail to live up to his expectations.

Lower IQ women always go for the 'bad boy'.....like I said above.
Low IQ women never mature over a certain level.

This is how choice determines your fate.
It's not determined until the individual determines it with his/her choice.
Free-will.

Additionally, women are good at following precedent laid out for them by males. they cannot innovate, or think outside the box. They can only adhere to conventions...this makes them perfect nurturers.

Past - precedent - predicts future.

Bullshyte....all love is conditional.
Only with men no pretences are necessary.

Everyone Needs To Hear This!

Do you believe in free-will?
The vid suggests it.

Choice does increase probability, it does not guarantee anything.

Your parents give you potentials; nurture establishes to what degree these potentials can be cultivated.
So, choice is crucial but it does not guarantee anything.

Rags to Riches is an ascent on the social hierarchy.
There are many ways to ascend, determined by your genetic inheritance and will-power - how much you desire it.

Spirit of the Postmodern Herd
Organism's hate what denies them access - what excludes them; they fear what posits a limit to their power - limiting their freedom.
Here is where the concept of 'evil' takes root; here is where the power of nil is cultivated, gathering all those who share the same fears and hatreds.

Instead of feeling insulted and becoming angry, listen to the mediocre when they critique you.
They are telling you about themselves.

As always...patterns.....precedent....exposes, reveals...
Those with a past history of relying on proxies and methods and icons, or mediating formulas, will have a subjective knowledge if themselves....so all their critiques are based on what little they know of themselves, indirectly.
Such minds ill project what little they know, and what they find insulting and unacceptable about themselves as a method of self-purification.
All that they find negative about themselves - relative to an ideal - they will project as an undermining insult to deal with what they find threatening.

BeatifulNo one has ever become poor from giving~Anne Frank [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Tansu YEĞEN (@TansuYegen) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Only those who know suffering can ever be truly compassionate... only those who truly know need can ever become generous.
The rest are going my a projection, a theory, that confuses empathy for sympathy/antipathy.

Only those who have truly known a man and a woman, can know what femininity and masculinity truly is.
The rest are goin on a theoretical caricature given to them from an external agency, and have no clue, outside of this caricature, what both concepts actually mean - in the truest definition of the term 'meaning.'

In theory everything can become angelic or dæmonic pure good ro evil - as it is imagined by the infantile mind taking the parental ideal as its basis - but in practice everything has a risk and a cost, making the act - the consistently repeating behaviour - all the more profound.

Ethiopia had slaves, only abolished in 1942??? Shocking, since it's well known that the only people who have ever owned slaves are White Europeans.
And this: "Most history is hotly contested in Ethiopia, a patchwork of 90 ethnic groups prone to[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Kevin MacDonald (@TOOEdit) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

"Diversity" in the US: one mixed-race minority mostly black trans lesbian friend, in a group of a dozen suburbanite rich wealthy white liberal teenagers. They are "diverse" because they have one or two good 'token' blacks in their social groups. Their shame and guilt is wiped away, they are "proud" of how diverse they are.

Diversity does not mean that the rich white liberal needs to go live in the ghetto among "real" black and hispanic gang bangers.

I ain't no Christian prude, buuuut....the anus is not a sex organ.
An appendage or an orifice or a limb can be sued for anything, but anything is not what it evolved to facilitate.
A human can have intercourse with anything....this does not mean intercourse evolved to fuck everything and anything.

Philosophy's love of wisdom is a measure of a mind's perceptibility – its appreciation of symmetry/proportionality – with all its possible and impossible applications/utility – but it is also a measure of a mind's endurance, and of 'how much of reality can it endure so as to perceive useful patterns – we call ‘wisdom.'
Those with no endurance, beyond a median level, associate anything more as being hateful – ‘love of wisdom becoming hate of wisdom’; a hatred they project upon the source as being its motive, because for them wisdom is always positive and useful, and they cannot appreciate from where it comes and how their favourite sources collected and fermented it to make it a palatable intoxicating nectar even a layman can appreciate.

First you deal with the perspective and then its source, if you wish to explain why it was erroneous.
A sequence inverted by nihilists.

Masculine debate tactics: attack the position, then explain why the mind adopted it.
Feminine debate tactics: attack the mind, speculating as to why it adopts a position - usually using derogatory speculations - then disregard the position since there's nobody to defend it, so it does not matter.

This is based on is based on objective and subjective convictions.
For the male there is an objective field he competes in - then speculating on the subjective minds that challenged him; for the female there is no objective world, all is subjective, social, group dynamics, psychology.
Straight form their respective reproductive specializations: males sexual success is based on proving his value in the world; females sexual success is based on proving her value within the group, i.e., popularity, collective judgement....

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Dalton Clodfelter (@TRightDissident) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

I can attest to this....
Low gag reflex...
Not phobia, not fear, not hatred....but disgust.
Automatic....
For me the worse is mucus.
Not blood, not so much faeces....but snot; anything that feels or looks like mucus.
No other fears....I am a bit nervous about heights, due to the loss of control, and I do not like spiders.
Snakes bugs, don't bother me....spiders make me cringe.