Harsh Truths

Man. This realization hurts. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Malcolm Fle✘ - Amoral Mercenary (@Malcolm_fleX48) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

And so many males are dropping out of the rat-race - becoming indifferent towards society, self-centered,....un-invested.
Why do anything, if you are not invested in the outcome?

Many men wait for some idealized female that does not exist - but only in their minds, reacting to the females who also wait for that ideal male that only exists in Hollywood movies and in fantasy novels.

Naïve idealists, cultivated over the decades on Hollywood brainwashing.

When you define a concept out of existence nothing in existence can ever match it.
A Platonic ideal, casting a shadow upon the world.
Only in fantasy, in dreams, does it haunt them.
Some feel ashamed, blaming themselves for not being worthy; the majority blame the world for failing to live up to their naïve idealistic - romantic - expectations.

Social systems are collectives of wills.
Everyone that participates in them contributes, positively or negatively, to its welfare with every willful choice he/she makes.
On a grander scale, every willful choice made in any system affects them all – no matter how insulated they may be – because all exist within the same world.
Existence itself is nothing more than dynamic interactivity – implying causality.

A reminder of where some of the most popular mechanisms to shut down debate came from. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— NilusofSinai (@nilusof) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

A way of silencing....harsh truths....without challenging them.
Shaming as a weapon.
The eternally "innocent" using guilt trips to silence the expression of reality, i.e., truth, in order for lies to flourish, i.e., supported by ego, and fear, envy and all emotions.

Intelligence is a measure of processing speed, data assimilation, and recognition of patterns.
For the simpleton certain patterns are imperceptible, because they span more than a human lifetime.

Cosmic time, for example....or the earth's weather cycles...or the rise and fall of civilizations.
For the participant nothing is perceptible; all is as it always was....normal....with small variances.
The simpler the mind that more limited its space/time perception.
Animals, for example cannot perceive any weather cycles, because their perceptual acuity is contained within limited space/time dimensions.  

Historical time is not human time.
Cosmic time is not organic time.

Patterns are consistent, repeating, predictable sequences......which in historical time span centuries, or more than one human lifetime.
Some patterns span generations.

Rise and decline of empires, for example, would be incomprehensible to an animal, and to a manimal.
Its pattern recognition is limited to the immediate or a few years ro decades, at most.

Idiocy is contained not only by the macro but also by the micro - subtlety, is imperceptible to a moron, as are grand historical cycles.
Their consciousness is boxed in by space/time....usually subjectively determined..
They perceive nothing beyond what affects their will, or their will can affect.

The idea of a whole, a one, a totality, is founded on this mental limit....the psyche's containment within a beginning and an end, representing the limits of tis space/time field of perceptions.
Simpler minds have smaller spatial/temporal 'boxes'; more sophisticated minds have larger spatial/temporal 'boxes'.

Gorillas finding their inner goddesses… [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Rollo Tomassi (@RationalMale) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This is where culturally enriching twerking comes from
Straight out of the African jungles.

Remember when Biden had 30,000 National Guard members "guarding" Washington DC and a Pakistani immigrant Uber driver was murdered by black teenage girls in front of the soldiers? And remember how they all got ridiculously light sentences because of racial equity? [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Califorด็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็iaOutlaw (@CalifornianOkie) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

80-20 Rule? More like 90-10...

Most women would rather let their ovaries shrivel into sand than procreate or habituate with the lower 80-90 of men. It's interesting to watch and observe the lengths an average woman goes to gain access to the top 20-10 of men (cheating / lying / whoring / manipulation with no moral limitation, any depravity open to her to get what/who she wants). In the end, she devotes herself entirely to men of political power/dominance.

Fuentes defended incel lifestyle with this verse. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Adam Green - Know More News (@Know_More_News) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

This is a problem. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Why do chimpanzee manimals feel safe behaving in this way; why do they feel they can take anything they like with impunity?

Happy Valentine's Day[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— TXDeplorable (@Texas_Made956) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Is it for the same reason paedophiles, and every kind of sexual deviance, now feels safe and empowered to express itself openly, now that homosexuality and transsexuality have been normalized; now that insanity has been relabeled sanity in the American empire?

Is this the consequence of poverty?

You are another year older. Happy Birthday.

WendyDarling wrote:

You are another year older. Happy Birthday.

Thanks.

Anarchists can only survive in the world if they conceal themselves, becoming parasitical upon non-anarchists, or if all authoritarian collectivists are exterminated from the world.

It's the same prerequisite as that of Marxism. Marxism can only survive in the world if it becomes opportunistic - hoping to undermine the system by participating in it - or if all alternate socioeconomic systems are eliminated from existence.

It is what was implied when I said all nihilistic ideologies/dogmas, from spiritual, i.e., Abrahamic, to secular, i.e., Marxism, Postmodernism, cannot survive in the real world unless they are protected from the consequences of their own delusions, or they contradict their own principles, necessitating self-deceit.

Humanism was an easy trap, for those who wrote it, created it, and perpetuated it.

You convince the European peasant, peon, prole, that he is 'Above' the status of an Animal.

And this opportunity is enough for the simpleton, the dull minded, to begin believing anything dictated by the one introducing this new 'Supremacy' and class-distinction. This was/is the primary method of spreading Abrahamism, conviction of the Subject, by possibility of an Object, that sets his Ego far above that of 'Animal' unnecessarily, and without justification. The simpleton finds this lure too delicate to not bite into. Like a fish, it keeps coming back to the same bait, century after century after century, with no Adaptation and no Evolution to avoid it.

It's an IQ distinction.

Æon wrote:

It's an IQ distinction.

As is the distinction between subjective/objective thinking.

From first person to third person perspectives.

An animal is trapped in the first-person, the manimal in the second....
The inferior cannot understand what is superior. it can only use what it knows....and so the midwit trapped in second person perspective uses itself, and finds there subjective motives, and phobias. That is all it understands, and all it can ever understand.
It perceives subjective manimal motives everywhere.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— esotericbot (@esotericbot) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

The greatest brilliance of man produces unexpected results.

But the lowest stupidity of man, also produces unexpected results.

Satyr wrote:

As is the distinction between subjective/objective thinking.

From first person to third person perspectives.

An animal is trapped in the first-person, the manimal in the second....
The inferior cannot understand what is superior. it can only use what it knows....and so the midwit trapped in second person perspective uses itself, and finds there subjective motives, and phobias. That is all it understands, and all it can ever understand.
It perceives subjective manimal motives everywhere.

What % of the general human population do you believe is Self-conscious?

If I had to throw a guess, I'd put it at 5-10%. What do you think?

Self-cosnciuoness is measured by degrees.

All humans have the ability to become self-consciuos - animals like dolphins and chimpanzees and whales, are also becoming and have developed some degree of self-awarness.

Intelligence determines the degree of self-consciuosness an individual can develop - courage, his/her psychological constitution determines how much of it he/she will actually manage to develop.

Over- under-estimation of self is typical...mostly overestimation.
Many think they are self-aware when they flatter themselves, or when they only focus on their talents and gifts and advantages but fail to consider the rest.

American Liberalism

Ironic how all those who preached Freedom and promoted Liberty, in the end, were the ones if you believed a different way, questioned, doubted them, tested them, that they were most anti-liberal of all!

They only offered an illusion of Choice, and never intended for you to Choose against them.

The "Choice" they offered was a ruse, a fake, an illusion.

Biblical narrative about the loss of Paradise, because Adam bit from the forbidden fruit, is an allegorical ruse to make free-will an excuse - for why evil exists - and a threat - to deny free-will even if it is given to you by god.
Exercising free-will, in the form of choice, leads to damnation; the correct way is to surrender your will to god's will.
Secular recovering Abrahamics surrender it to absolute roder.  
No need for primordial sin to explain why evil exists...absolving Abraham's one-god of all responsibility, and evading the implications concerning his absolute goodness.
Now, the possibility of choice is altogether negated - there is no evil/good because all is as it can only be - no right/wrong, no good/evil....all is as it was determined. No inferior/superior, all are manifestations of absolute order.
Laws of Nature replace Ten Commandments.
Sin is replaced by wokeness - some have been 'chosen' - determined - to become aware of how things are determined, some - the not-chosen, the unsaved - have not been determined to know how unfree we are.
Some know the mind of god, some do not.
So, now the inevitable is good, because future is always better than the past....at least for these psychotics.
Absolute good leads to absolution. Salvation.

Denial of Biology is the first requirement and necessity of Nihilism and Abrahamism specifically.

It appeals to the masses, because the majority of humanity necessarily inherit a Bad Lot. They lost the genetic gamble. Born ugly, or stupid, or poor, etc. So denying one's genes, and those responsible (biological parents), is essential to get Nihilistic compulsions and slave-morality off the ground.

The individual prole, peasant, peon, immediately and immensely gravitates to this possibility -- that you are 'more' than how you were born. Or that you are 'other' than how you were born. Or that you were born 'equal' to all else. And there is no actual class distinction or division separating people ...no actual inheritance, but some Mystical, Fantastical, Invisible Order at work, and that it is the "True Justice" of the world.


Then the masses can be made to do anything, especially against their own interests, and especially against their own Kin.

Zombification: zombies recognize no father, mother, children...no race, no sex....all they distinguish is the infected and the healthy, the uninfected.
Those they must consume - reduce to tis parts - or assimilate; make ill like themselves.
They need not know they are acting no behalf of a mental virus.
All they must do is submit to the primal impulses...feed, fuck...hedonism.

No conspiracy of zombies...all are individuals, acting as separate individuals yet like a herd.
Like birds flocking; fish schooling; bovines herding....all primal.
The effect is as if by design.
Watch a flock of birds flying....like a dance directed by some secret musical rythmes only they can hear - as if they were directed by some invisible maestro.

Twins, one male, one female, will develop the same traits to a different degree.
Same genetics, same family, same upbringing....not the same physically nor mentally.
Why?
Hormones.
Hormones adjust inherited potentials - along with nurturing - to their environmentally determined fullest extent- determined genetically.
The male to facilitate his reproductive role; the female to facilitate her reproductive role.

Both physical and mental/psychological, traits are adjusted to the particular reproductive roles.
Sex is not a social construct....neither is gender.
Gender is the cultural, social, application of sexual reproductive roles, mirroring trait potentials.

Among the sheltered - men children retarded in development - born and raised on comforting, comfortable, pleasant lies, any hint of truth feels like a violent attack.
Its a matter of subjective experiences.
A realist seems far right to a deranged ideologue lefty; to a righty the same realist seems naïve and a collectivist.

To a man who has become accustomed to lifting weights, 60 kg, is nothing..... another who has only lifted his arm or a glass or spoon his entire life, the same weight feels unbearable.


This is the meaning of the saying...soft times create soft men; soft men create hard times.
We are coming to hard times, because men-children have become so soft that reality feels unbearable to them - a violent, life threatening assault on them and their ilk.
Common sense is no longer common.
What we have now is collective sensuality - hedonism....a desire to maintain our safe spaces from reality's intrusions.
Such men-children, born and raised on the lie that all the unpleasantness is socially constructed - a subjective intrusion into their subjective bubbles, for no reason, they believe, other than sadistic pleasure, which is their own primary motive - such men-children, born into this lie, will consider anything real an unsubstantiated fabrication, the antithesis to their own unsubstantiated fabricated comfortable lies.
Their primary motives becomes the intruder's primary motive.
Unable to become objective all they have is their own subjectivity to help them understand the world.

Orwell, George wrote:

In a Time of Universal Deceit — Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act.

When pleasing lies have become popular, telling the truth is a risky endeavour.
Intoxicated masses will fight tooth and nail to preserve their sheltering comforts, and will consider any attempt to wake them from their dreams an existential attack upon them personally.  

George Orwell wrote:

That the choice for mankind lay between freedom and happiness, and that, for the great bulk of mankind, happiness was better.
1984

Truth refers to reality, and reality is rarely pleasant and beneficial to life.
The beneficial must be sought within the non-beneficial, and this requires the constitution to sift through mounds of unpleasantness to find that morsel that promises - not guarantees - some ephemeral pleasure.

When you've been raised to believe that the world is created by god or by men, and then imposed upon all, then any attempt to expose the lies will be experienced as a coercive imposition guided by an malicious intent.

The irrational must project itself as an undermining accusation. The threat becomes irrational because the threatens has no reason to defend what is, for it, a matter of survival.
It cannot rationally defend the lies it finds comforting, so it must accuse the threat of lacking reasoning.


Ask a degenerate man-child to defend the idea that races do not exist, and that sex has no impact on psychology and mental potentials - just as they have no physical potentials.
Ask him to rationalize why humans are excluded from what applies to all other species.
They can't without exposing how dependent they are on idols and icons that sold them the same lies they now repeat without knowing why; they can't without exposing the fear underlying their convictions....
Naturally fear becomes an attack no anything that threatens to expose what motivates them.

As ingle liar is not much of a threat, but when the lie become collectivized then their mass, driven by a desperate need to protect their shared lies, can become dangerous.
And it has.

This is the logical conclusion of the delusion of equality.  What it leads to. Not the idealistic romantic notion of universal civil concord between fellow men(of a particular civilized race), as the American forefathers alluded, but the literal lunacy of the barbaric erasure of all appearances. When inferior and vulgar spirits take possession of things meant only for higher noble spirits, than only the grotesque and abominable creations and forms of it will come about.

These morons are too far gone to understand how they created this.

BREAKING
New World #1 in women’s 50-54 age 1500m is a male athlete.

Qs to [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] & [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] :
WHY are you not protecting the integrity of the female category?
WHY do you insist on showing such blatant sex-discrimination?[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— International Consortium on Female Sport (ICFS) (@ICFSport) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

In an inter-connected world there is no 'live and let live'.
Every choice, every act, has cascading effects affecting those beyond the immediate.
Society is interdependent.

There is no subjective private universe.
In moral issues, especially, a behaviour, an action, can contradict group cohesion and the group's long-term survival.

Objectively speaking, and with no personal bias....criminal behaviour refers to parasitism.
A criminal attempts to live off a collective - against its morals, its rules, contradicting its well-being.