- apaosha wrote:
- Interesting article from a NPR journalist complaining about his company turning into a circlejerk disconnected from reality: [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
He doesn't like the lack of diversity, eg all the people in NPR from DC are registered democrats, zero republicans. This is deeply problematic apparently because it indicates a fundamental lack of viewpoint diversity, which is not what this little turd claims to have signed on for. Pretty funny.
They lack the legitimacy that a wide mandate gives them. I wrote before about how Liberalism works as a sort of dualistic system of prog v con:
All nihilistic dogmas/ideologies are dualistic - absolute either/or contradicting the multiplicity of existence.
They need absolute final certainties, and these are missing from existence - chaos being the primary factor.
- apaosha wrote:
- Progressivism instigates and implements Liberal policy when in power.
Progressives suffer from the superstitious remnants of Abrahamic, believing that 'change' leads to what is better.
In their deluded minds we are "progressing" towards perfection....so conservatives, resisting change, i.e., progress, want to stop this perfection from being realized.
This final state of 'perfection' is imagines as the opposite of what is occurring. they imagine it as absoltue roder: uniform, equal, with no conflicts.
We are, in fact, progressing towards chaos, and conservatism attemtps to affrest this.
Conservatism is fighting a losing battle, and liberalism is fighting for the opposite fo what is occuring - the left is delusional.....
Nihilism inverts everything.
- apaosha wrote:
- The substance of this is an open borders welfare state and the promotion of weird sexual/racial identity advocacy, which is unsustainable.
The use of pleasure to control is part of husbundry.
We train animals using pleasure....they are training mankind using the same methods.
Pleasure principle is part of marketing - propaganda.
They destroy the institutions that maintain some participation in satisfying sexual desires, impulses, and then use the consequences to exploit those who now suffer sexual frustrations.
If we change contexts, we can train an animal by imposing upon it a state of hunger, so that the gratification of hunger becomes a tool to exploit it.
You become for it the source of gratificaiton...a god.
This is what transexuality is about.
It is also what abortinos are about.
The state provides a means of overcoming natural limits to female promiscuity, so it becomes, for her, a god - provider and protector, giving her access to unrestricted pleasure - perlasure with no costs.
Same with the polack, on ILP.
The American system promises him sexual gratification, a way of overcoming his genetic baggage.....so he worships America, and accuses anyone who exposes this as suffering form what he is suffering.
Transexuals are the same.
The destruction of monogamy, and the institution of marriage, creates many sexually frustrated males, and some females - un-invested in the system.
The American system tells them that it is okay to redirect their sexual impulses towards other methods of relief.
It takes away the shame, approving their degeneracy.
- apaosha wrote:
- The social chaos this produces causes the mass to look for an alternative, the only permitted one of which is Conservatism. The substance of Conservatism is the conservation of current social and political conditions the effect of which is the conservation of Liberalism, namely the social and political reforms enacted by progs. Progs instigate social change, Cons preserve this change in the face of resistance.
Not only current but ancient methods of dealing with natural injustices.
Monogamy, marriage....and the ethical rules regulating them, successfully integrated unfit males and females into the system.
The cost was the gradual accumulation of unfit mutations, which were dealt with through wars.
- apaosha wrote:
- This then goes back and forth over a period of decades, ensuring unrest is contained and the trajectory of the Liberal society is maintained.
You could see this dualistic Liberal system as a very efficient social management system as it is capable of both implementing social change and also managing the unrest that this change creates. Part of it's success is in getting many of the participants to believe in the lies it tells itself and others.
Liberalism is infected by Abrahamic superstitions.
They believe all this is part of a cosmic movement towards perfection.
"The right side of history."
They haven't overcome Abrahamism (Gnosticism), they've secularized its myths.
Liberalism cannot survive reality.
It must either contradict its own principles, or suffer the consequences of its romantic idealistic values.
If they continue to impose their mythologies on Americanism, and tis vassal states, the entire system is doomed.
It cannot compete with systems that reject their amoral delusions.
Like communism could not survive in a world where there was an alternative socioeconomic system, it could only survive in a ideal world, populated by ideal humans, where it held a monopoly.
This is why all these nihilistic dogmas must impose themselves globally, eradicating all alternatives.
- apaosha wrote:
- If they are no longer representing, in their own minds at least, the coalition of the moderates against the fringes - if they have instead BECOME the fringe, in their own minds, then they're faced with a big problem.
Their "problem" is that they exist on the "fringe" of reality, gradually going over the edge.
They cannot socially engineer their ideal world, so they must remain there, trapped between ideal and real, seducing all those myriads of humans who seek an escape from the "inhumanity" of nature.
They will always find a following, they will always become popular, and they will always fail.