Know Thyself

Nothing in Excess
 
HomePortalFAQMemberlistSearchRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism.

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3
AuthorMessage
Impulso Oscuro

avatar

Gender : Male Aries Posts : 342
Join date : 2013-12-10
Age : 27
Location : Praxis

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sun Sep 10, 2017 10:39 pm

Slaughtz wrote:
Those claiming to support such behaviors rely on faith or, if believing they actually accomplish it, are claiming the ability for supernatural power and are likely delusional while also claiming for themselves the very idea of perfect goodness in what amounts to a narcissism or delusion of grandeur that is more pathological than even the most cartoonish representations of an 'evil' throughout history.

Not only is it more pathological but i think such pathologies are the creators of such hyperbolic representations in the first place.

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Thu Sep 14, 2017 2:55 pm

The idea that one cannot be pro-white and not anti-black is equivalent to the conviction that one cannot be simultaneously pro-living not murderous of everyone else. It is only a special kind of psyche that is murderous of everyone and all life that would utilize such an argument at its basic structure - and then on the top of it deflect from their responsibility to their demonstrated pattern when called out on it. This, leaving fools and the spineless to not properly reciprocate in response to the psychopathy, in the same manner one would fire a rocket launcher at a sniper, no matter if there's many hooded women, children or other men purposefully standing in the way so you cannot retaliate and disarming you from any other means of doing so. There's plenty of space for them to move out of the way, and this logic being applied against those 'anti-semites', where they'll tear down every platform if it means hosting even one iota of a vitalizing ethos that wreaks destruction on suppressive parasites is justification enough for a reciprocal response. It is the parasite's hope you won't take it up on its gamble. It's typical of parasites to promote 'love' while condemning 'hateful antibodies'.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Kvasir

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 1331
Join date : 2013-01-09
Age : 32
Location : Gleichgewicht

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:13 pm

The notion of “Free speech” has become the new mediator of modern political nihilism. It injects itself into every conflict that erupts between both political sides. The left use it as a Marcusean divined threat to be abolished and overcome to allow their Stalinist-communist agenda to progress. While on the right, we see it as their guiding principle of their own stunted psychological weakness to actualize the traditional tenets and values they promulgate and champion.

Those on the modern right have become a product of their evolution of liberal indoctrination and cling to the idea of “free speech” to express their passivity inherited from their inferior generation that they ardently distance themselves from but are actually kindred to. The preoccupation with using reason to overcome all threats no matter how dangerous they are, is the maladaptive trait they have cultivated. Their social engineering and conditioning from academia and sheltered reality through simulated forms of education, and the uncontrolled unassailable age of rationalism, has produced in them the delusion that now any problem can be solved by way of reason alone, without any other means of force or physical violence. That any threat can be met without anybody really getting hurt, and that the age old conflict resolution of ‘talking things over’ will solve any problem.

The modern rightists are not much different than the inept, inert, and indifferent establishment politicians and elite who regurgitate the same platitudes and talking points that lead to no real objective (maintenance of the status quo), but retention of their power. The right of Free Speech implies nothing more than a form of “agree to disagree” stagnate, slavish decrepitude reinforcing the strength of the ankle chains keeping them locked down in inadvertent submission. Where the events spiraling out of control can be regulated by the traits of intellectual feminization we see in their inability to see that reason has limits and cannot be the balm on every problem, the contrast to the degenerate animals on the left who think the idea of equality can be the balm on everything. Both sides have found their delusions. Both sides have their pacifiers they suckle on. Both are trapped in limbo that they constantly attempt to escape from through patterns of impulsive behavior, one side with physical outbursts because of mental inferiority and low IQ, and the other from intellectual social constraints and conventions that strap them down to obedience to their institutionalized master of social law.

Stephan Molynuex, everyone’s favorite witch doctor of rhetorical and verbal acrobatics and sophistry, came out with a new book promoting the “art of the argument” and how words and rationale can solve everything if we just close our eyes and believe with all out heart and practice self-deluding exercises of meditation and breathing techniques that take in the irrefutable points of logic and expel the rest of the bad stuff in reality, that doesn’t give a shit about human contrivances. Or the current trending vaudeville theater taking place in the NFL where physically grotesque multimillionaire niggers protest a flag representing nothing having to do with their imagined “oppression” but with the history of oppression that European man inflicted on himself, which the ones who cheer and jeer in opposition and protest in favor of this symbol of degeneracy are just as clueless and retarded as the niggers protesting something their animal brains can’t fathom.

But there are those who have genuine spirit. Those who merge with these movements with sensible purpose and who display knowledge of the truth that lies beneath the fog of delusion. Those who choose to use whatever tools buried in the mound of excrement that they can find to than construct some artifice of reason despite the absurdity and madness of that which stands against them. And it is those lone or small groups of souls that perhaps still make the seasons change.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:16 am

" 'Nazis' are SJWS "
There are two comment/threads I created to this accusation because I was tired of expecting someone else to speak up about it.
--

Slaughtz @Slaughtz Oct 2, 2017, 11:44:33 PM EDITED
An SJW is one who gets offended and challenges the other violently for it, all while saying that the other is the one committing violence and that they're only doing something in self-defense AND simultaneously telling you that you're crazy or that what they're doing is for your own good. The difference between an SJW and a 'Nazi' is in the last part: the SJW performs all that while the 'Nazi' says it's very obviously not for your own good as you're opposed to their own. You might ask how it is the SJW actually does that, and it's by their ideological proclamations that they're doing things for the 'good of everyone' or 'good of humanity' and that you're literally subhuman or nonhuman/monstrous for what you do. Meanwhile the 'Nazi' says he's human like you and part of humanity is the monstrosity and he's there to say you're no better than him and he knows just how monstrous and evil you can be - and now fight him. You will acquire no acquiescence of 'superiority' or compliments from the SJWs. They will not give you the satisfaction - and certainly the women of that kind should not, because it has been bred in patriarchy that to kill them is more inhumane. It is the orbiters and the ignorant ethnic others, controlled by a more subversive ethnic group which gives them the license for pathology, which makes them engage you with words that are totally disabling and monstrous in their speech, like 'racist', which demonizes the very act of self-interested behaviors and natural tribalisms. That which if acted upon consistently would destroy all desire for reproduction or otherwise maintenance of the species. They attack and shame you for the very things fundamental to everything you (and 99% of people) are and say: this is for everyone, this is for humanity, this is for you.

To possible objections: yes, 'Nazis' say that there are traitors and cucks, but they do not do this to the degree which SJWs do. That is, the scope of the 'Nazi' is their tribe and the scope of the SJW is the whole of humanity. Just on a principle of maximizing locality/local agency, one would have to concede 'Nazis' are preferable to SJWs - provided you do not think they are any more hateful than SJWs. The Holocaust is supposed to be the evidence which convinces you that they are. Somehow American children raised from the 90s and 80s are those 'Nazis' or will even have such a hatred without a justification that's more reasonable than sheer pathology, as Hitler is portrayed. To say that their scope excluding other tribes means they 'hate' other tribes would be incorrect. It is an indifference. If you will not countenance indifference as a position in life, then you are the radical and extremist. And they are indifferent until they are threatened within the framework they have set up. No 'Nazi' has invaded far off corners of the world because they thought there resided a threat with indigenous populations. Even some still persist today despite the Anglo-Semitic empire that sought to fulfill their White Man's Burden.

---
-OP says 'right-wing SJWs' censor lewdness-

Slaughtz @Slaughtz Sep 30, 2017, 1:07:33 PM
Banning children from consuming porn is different. If you're going to consume porn, it should be looked down upon culturally and as something only a minority do - of which we don't ban the consumption of because we are faced with either driving it underground or stricter punishments. It is not an argument that practically people 'come out fine' from a childhood filled with this or otherwise. The interest is not in creating 'fine' people, but the best people we can of which the majority are capable. Also, calling nazis and tradcons a bunch of SJWs is like calling the banker Jews your immortal god and probably expressing your advocacy for the killing off of the white race, as well. That makes you aligned with SJWs, btw. In case you couldn't catch it. Also, if there's correlationary arguments against porn and other sexually focused things just as there is correlationary arguments for it within that video, you have to decide which ones take precedence over the others and what sort of balance there will be. If there are those arguments against porn, then that video provides impetus for a systematic analysis of the data and not a conclusive policy decision. I have even played such games, but like with Hatred, I believe they need to be rated appropriately for adults and not children. The only reason I don't advocate for some sort of age verification system for adult games online with short time-outs is because it's another DRM (and I was at one point a gamer) and too big-brothery. Where a free market and authorityless solution can be implemented in practical terms without allowing easy access to the content for children, I am in favor of it, along with decentralized solutions, over the centralized.

Intothekey @Intothekey Sep 30, 2017, 1:20:46 PM EDITED
@Slaughtz I agree with this snipped-- If you're going to consume porn, it should be looked down upon culturally and as something only a minority do. However I do agree with calling the old religious right SJW's, because they were. They used government laws to enforce morality instead of protecting the individual (the governments job) The difference I would say is that the religious right were promoting good behavior but used violence to force people to comply. While SJW's are promoting bad behavior and forcing people to comply.

Slaughtz @Slaughtz Sep 30, 2017, 2:19:54 PM
@Intothekey 'call the old religious right SJWs' This seems only so that you don't have to confront the Christian character and origin of the censorship. They used to be called Christian fundamentalists. Calling them 'SJW' is inaccurate since the distinguishing characteristic of an SJW is their active suppressing of content for ... social justice. Not religious justice. Difference. One is (((secular))) and the other is not. Maybe outside America this doesn't make any sense to people, but in America there is the first amendment which makes the distinction important. There is no religious reason behind the SJW's actions.

Intothekey @Intothekey Sep 30, 2017, 3:25:35 PM
@Slaughtz I guess if you want to get technical. But the bottom line is that they both suppress free-speech in order to suite their personal beliefs. They're both authoritarians who censored those who disagree. They're behavior is uncannily similar so it's a fair comparison to make. Sjw's are modern day moral busy body authoritarians. And when it comes to censorship and Christianity, People have often used the bible to control people but this is true for anything that claims to have authority. There is no verses I can think of that support censorship.


Slaughtz @Slaughtz Sep 30, 2017, 3:51:22 PM EDITED
@Intothekey the justification in the bible is being against prostitution. Essentially recording sin and then watching it for a purpose other than an activist purpose is just foreign and odd to the Christian. That is like watching murder tapes and it goes against their tastes to even consider watching those things unless necessary. Comparing is fine, but they are not SJWs. You might as well call every authoritarian and morally proscriptive movement SJW when some of it really very justified and some of it is not. Calling them SJW is an obvious referwnce to your disagreement but it ignores the purpose and dilutes the purpose of 'SJW' to go around calling ones outside the proper context the same thing. You might as well be calling everyone nazi. And here is the source for fundamentalism [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

-OP interjects: "Censorship is censorship. I don't care where it comes from, it must not stand."-


Last edited by Slaughtz on Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:30 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 2456
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 34
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:29 am

There is always censorship.

The leftist wants to own your soul, he wants you to think like he does, he needs you but he also wants to dominate your mind. Feminine tactics.

N.S wants to put degenerates into an (metaphorical) oven or into a swamp outside the village.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 2456
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 34
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Tue Oct 03, 2017 4:37 am

No censorship is ultimately shitlib or cuckservative talk.
They want to hide the censorship and they don't want anybody to openly and directly shut up them -> feminine advantage.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Satyr
Daemon
avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 16577
Join date : 2009-08-24
Age : 52
Location : Flux

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Thu Oct 19, 2017 4:16 pm


_________________
γνῶθι σεαυτόν
μηδέν άγαν
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://satyr.canadian-forum.com/
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sun Oct 29, 2017 11:40 pm

Tatsusama wrote:
The Feminist church is ever forming, haha:
- Feminism = Title of religion
- Misogyny = Original sin (confess that you have it and it can be forgiven....Eventually... Not really)
- Feminist = Part of the flock
- Non-Feminist = Lost sheep who have yet to see the light or, more oftenly, irredeemable sinners to be burned in front of society
- Patriarchy = Satan/Lucifer, unseen demons
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
Yep 'internalized misogyny' made it such. There's a lot of churches/sects all under the bigger blue church. One for sexism, racism, anti-semitism, and for homosexuality.

misgynist/internalized misogyny
racism/internalized racism (uncle tom)
anti-semitic/self-hating jew (internalized anti-semitism)
homosexuality/(something faggy)
uneducated-impoverished-workerclass/(voting against your own interests)

With regard to the blue church and its original sin: b-but, doesn't the Alt-Right have the same with self-hating whites?!
No, we attribute cucks to being bourgeois and empty, dishonest, parrots of Jewish brainwashing. They are either naive, sheltered, dumb, dull or weak. Unable to face even the shadow of their Christian Father, who was the seed of the 'Enlightenment' and the American 'all men being equal' and 'tabula rasa' becoming 'genera rasa' (or racially nullified). They not only do not humble themselves to the judgment of Nietzsche before them ('God is dead'), but demand everyone become as arrogant as them in the face of it by subscribing to their increasingly self-destructive behavior, thinking that through a total reversal of self-interested behavior they will somehow resolve all conflict which makes them upturn their noses indignantly. If everyone was just as bourgeois as them, the world would not have its current problems. They have rejected respect for their fathers and have become bastards of not just a world after death, but of the world today. They have paid no initiation into becoming a fully cultured Aryan man/adult and have not let even the Christian Father restrict their behavior. They are barbarians of discourse, science and inquiry.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Mon Oct 30, 2017 2:58 pm

How they use progressive buzzwords as religious hymns to keep themselves from coming face-to-face with someone like them, someone who could have been them or could be their child. No matter your talents, they don't want you ever to use them if it means to make for yourself a better life, or even a bearable one. When you've encountered suffering that is so foreign to their experience, that they don't understand how it is you can desire to become militant and disciplined, to become orderly so that no one you love will have to suffer the same fate you did - and they see that structure and your hatred of the laissez-faire indifference as a vice and not a virtue: they act in belief as if your body healing a wound is a sign of weakness and not strength - no matter what the reasons for the wounds beforehand. The suffering you experience as a child, when you do not know better, they become extreme advocates of indifference to it - while taking themselves to be compassionate to others. The same people will wonder how it is you could be so conservative minded socially or economically, thinking your emphasis on self-sufficiency is heartless, while excusing your own troubled history as an 'explanation' for what they call your vice - returning to their ivory tower. (Nevermind conservatives being the most numerous of voluntarily charitable people.) They believe that a peaceful state of mind is a right and not something you must work for. They cut your initiative out from under you the moment you need a little help* getting yourself there, because your very goal of independence and self-sufficiency undermines their whole belief.

*what help is this? The 'help' of not actively trying to sabotage you.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sun Nov 05, 2017 8:23 pm

Muilticulturalism
Anyone who supports the idea, or any idea similar to, that "you can't understand Islam if you haven't lived it" are also saying multiculturalism is impossible without conflict and tension. Segregation is inevitable because you will only be able to associate deeply with those who are capable of understanding. Either that, or you will reduce Islam down to something it wasn't before, or convert others to Islam in such a way that you've destroyed their identity and pushed them under the one banner of Islam.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Cult_Leader

avatar

Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 33
Join date : 2017-04-27
Age : 41
Location : Scandinavia

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:57 am

Slaughtz wrote:
The purpose is to evoke mystique by saying that a female who speaks in sociological language is just as correct as someone who speaks in physics language.

Technically, both are correct since sociology and physics are two different academic fields, each with their own language philosophy. The problem arises when the "soft" and "hard" sciences try to describe and explain a phenomenon that belong in the academic realm of both. (ref: Hans Skjervheim - "Objectivism and study of man")
Back to top Go down
View user profile http://mindcontrol666.blogspot.no/
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Mon Nov 13, 2017 4:50 pm

White culture is merely 'human culture'.

'Human culture' appropriated by non-whites is non-white culture.

Non-white culture is non-white culture.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Tue Nov 14, 2017 1:59 pm

Context: Kraut and Tea is a 'Skeptic' YouTuber that made a video demanding those who countenance race to find the 'race gene'.


Last edited by Slaughtz on Fri Jan 05, 2018 8:50 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sat Dec 09, 2017 3:14 pm

Feminist on their body: My body! My rules!
Feminist on their child: My child! Your responsibility!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Wed Dec 13, 2017 10:33 am

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sun Feb 04, 2018 5:22 am

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:58 am

Communists, non-whites, have seriously and openly started questioning whether it's time to 'deny whites the franchise'. Whites are a group all over the world, denying this is basically genocide of a whole people based on skin color. At forefront of this are crypto-///s.

Their lying on this is, when pressed, they say 'white(ness) is a racist institution'. But, you ask them whether a white skinned person is capable of not being racist, and they'll say it's not possible.

This is a change from an offensive stance, where they justify any aggression, to a defensive one where they'll plead for mercy. However, the intensity with which they demonstrate aggression is evidence of their own hypocrisy by demonstrating having never entertained the idea of mercy themselves.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:18 pm

"Truth" to the Western liberal-Communist is a frame in which they are faultless. When a liberal-Communist says that what they argue is 'true', they are really arguing the frame they present themselves as faultless is 'true', to them. If you reject it, they increasingly throw a tantrum.

--
The difference between a nationalist and Western liberal-Communists is their responses to accusations of being at fault for something. The nationalist disowns responsibility for others, but owns it for themselves. The latter disowns responsibility for themselves but owns it for others.

This dialectical contrast means that the liberal-Communist can always acquire sympathy: "I am responsible, for your problems, and I'm sorry." The liberal-Communist refuses responsibility-taking for those whom they have animus toward, namely nationalists. This contrast, while apparently an 'equal and opposite reaction' to the nationalist, is not so because of its unnatural character. This gives the liberal-Communist only two poles of social experience: resentment and sanctimoniousness.

The nationalist, though, is capable of indifference even in social (human) settings. What appears to be 'unempathetic' is actually usually an empathy and understanding which makes them indifferent. That is, having gone through trouble themselves, they feel no special treatment is owed to someone on account of their suffering alone. Making this into a pathology are those who throw tantrums, expecting they're owed or entitled to more than their target.

This is also what makes a nationalist's 'sympathy' and responsibility-taking have meaning. They own themselves enough to viscerally feel and conquer the sacrifices they make for another, requiring more courage. Appropriately, the liberal-Communist usually demands others pay the price for their sanctimonious protests.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Anfang

avatar

Gender : Male Virgo Posts : 2456
Join date : 2013-01-23
Age : 34
Location : CET

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sun Mar 11, 2018 9:51 am


You have to "liberate" people again and again so that they can be blessed with "our" (((values))).
What you gonna do but liberate people from their bigoted ways since they find you repulsive?

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Sun Mar 18, 2018 10:40 am

Liberalists have framed their worldview such that it would be impossible for the white race to be victim of genocide in any possible worlds, despite their imaginations easily considering what a black or brown genocide would look like enough to show concern about it. Because they are relying on an absurd frame of reference, as a premise, they are equally absurd. The same absurd frame is and was adopted by SJWs.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Tue May 01, 2018 10:04 am


Spoiler:
 

While these types are on the back foot, having to take it seriously, their 'evil opposition' is making a mockery of them.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Slaughtz



Gender : Male Pisces Posts : 1585
Join date : 2012-04-28
Age : 27
Location : Brink

PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism. Fri May 04, 2018 12:44 pm

Liberal: It's transphobic to say femininity is biological and it's misogynist to have a cultural standard expression for femininity.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism.

Back to top Go down
 
The Hypocrisy of Western Liberalism.
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 3 of 3Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Know Thyself :: AGORA-
Jump to: