De-Constructing Philosophy ( Quickly )

Most people are ignorant of the underlying functions of biology. For example: many people think that love is a thing in of itself or that it is some transcendental reality ( Usually mystics subscribe to the latter ). But, in reality, love is a ploy of biology - a numbing agent to keep the organism hooked in the game of reproduction. So when people think that they, ultimately, act in the name of love, they are incorrect for reasons prior mentioned.

Philosophy - the love of wisdom. It should, actually, be called " The love of power". The naive philosopher ( like the mystic who erroneously thinks he acts, ultimately, out of love ) is wrong to think that he pursues wisdom for the sake of wisdom alone; the philosopher, ultimately, pursues philosophy because it is a means of increasing his power ( " Knowledge is power " ), thus giving him an evolutionary advantage over his competitors. Most philosophers are probably unaware of this ( ironically ), but it still remains true; the organism doesn't need to be aware of underlining biological complexities in order to function.

Some philosophers can become plagued with an insatiable lust of acquiring more knowledge (*cough* POWER *cough*) akin to a steroid junky of a weightlifter that becomes obsessed with acquiring physical power. Of course, not all philosophers are as prior described ( Intellectual junkies ), but fundamentally, the weight-lifter and the philosopher are operating on the same playing field: Darwinian evolution. The philosopher does not transcend base biological realities with his supposed " love of wisdom". The naive philosopher often sticks his nose up in the air to the hedonists - to the mundane, but fundamentally his " love of wisdom" is a base, biological ploy to assist in his navigation and domination of the mundane, the world. Philosophy is just something to be used for carnal reasons. The philosopher acts, ultimately, on the same lowly and carnal playing field as the materialistic-hedonist; both strive for the same biological ends and both are ignorant or in denial of the underlying complexities.

Excellent!!!
You've sufficiently expressed the equalization of the materialist/hedonist with the rational thinker.

The animal, or manimal, is now no more and no less, than a human being, the homo sapient sapient, in the truest sense of the term.
The lover of wisdom no more and no less than the lush; the hedonist in perpetual search for ephemeral satisfaction, no more and no less than a mind in search for clarity, though it may be hurtful to him; the materialist no more and no less than a mind seeking to define what matter is.

 

Thank you lad.
You've now offered evidence of your real essence, despite the posturing and redirected self-aggrandizing.
See why your seduction by Torn-Annus was inevitable?

When, and if, you understand why Nazism is a socialist outcrop, or how anarchy could only be part of the left political spectrum, you will begin to understand your own attraction to the projected future ...a "chaos" with a promising, but irrational, order.

I'll tell you a personal anecdote.
I once worked with a very pretty waitress.
She was perfect in form. Nice tits, nice ass, nice blond hair ...model material.
Then I talked to her.
No matter how hot she was, from far, the moment she opened her mouth to show me that rotting inside, I lost all sexual interest in her.
She became the ugliest thing I had ever seen.
She was bland, cold, flat, dull, internally obese.

Another time I was working with another waitress ...a plain, a bit chubby one; cute but average.
Then I talked to her, and her energy, her charisma, her attitude was the most sexually arousing thing I've ever experienced.
Something about her exuded feminine sexuality.
She made me feel alive. She held my attentions, and challenged my senses.

Now, boy, which one should I pick?

Yes, I am a carnal and base creature. I am an animal; I eat, fuck, piss, shit, and sleep. And I use philosophy as a means to an end, not an end itself.

And I'm not an anarchist for the sake of anarchism as an ultimate end in itself; I'm inclined towards anarchy as it is a means of establishing my own power structure. Big Brother is emasculating... perhaps it would be wise for myself to bring about his downfall in some manner. You see, his ideals and my ideals are in opposition, and I don't like when people tread on me, can ya dig that?

I would choose the physically attractive waitress; I wasn't evolved to copulate with physically unattractive females that use intellectualism as a over-compensation device. Nature evolved the impulse within me and most males to copulate with physically attractive females as they are more fertile and healthy. Also, most intellectual females I come across, there is usually something wrong with their femininity.

Primal Rage wrote:

Yes, I am a carnal and base creature. I am an animal; I eat, fuck, piss, shit, and sleep. And I use philosophy as a means to an end, not an end itself.

Indeed, you are that and that is what you will ever be.

The end is eating, fucking, shitting, pissing , for YOU.
This end, this motive, defines you.
Homo sapient sapient, does not apply to you.
My dog aspires to the same ends.
I, too, can admire the beauty of a dog, but I would not call it my own kind.

The ideal defines the organism, not its attainment.
The nihilist's ideal of "Nil," or "One", the positive form of the rejection of existence, defines the mind who dreams of its attainment.

The end is not eating, shitting, pissing, and fucking. The end is the perpetuation of my genetic material.

Darwinian Evolution 101.

Primal Rage wrote:

The end is not eating, shitting, pissing, and fucking. The end is the perpetuation of my genetic material.

Darwinian Evolution 101.

No, ugly little child, you said eating, fucking, pissing, and you only mentioned the species as an afterthought, to make your baseness and self-interested narcissism appear as more than what it is.
As a nihilist, hypocrite, you should understand how your positions contradict themselves.
Why would a nihilist care about humanity, boy, when humanity is to be destroyed?

But that aside ...let us say the perpetuation of man is your motive.
What kind of mankind is that?
One which is only about fucking, eating, shitting, and pissing life away ...like you?

And with that I've lost all interest in you.
You are a manimal and belong amongst those of your kind.
I suggest ILP, 'cause your little revolution is fizzling out.

Dogs, and your ilk, are about the same.
Dogs just don't have to justify their baseness and simplicity by evoking some bullshit species shared interest.
And species is a sexual type.

Sex is a method of discriminating and filtering.
It, sex that is, like eating, shitting, pissing, are needs, which maintain an organism.
If that organism identifies with only that, then it is no more than that.
When the means becomes the end, then looping, solipsism, narcissism, and modern man arises.

Anarchists are not so different than leftists, or Communists.
Only the means differ ...the goals and motives are the same.

When did I ever say I cared about humanity? I said the end is the perpetuation of *my* genetical material.

I'm trying to have a serious conversation with you, but you are throwing around elementary school insults like crazy.

PS: I'm more of a Right-wing anarchist.

Eating shitting, pissing, will be your legacy?

So, your "genetic material" is no different than a dog's or like one of those many moderns you associate with?
Fabulous.

You know who else thinks like this?
Shit-Smears.

The modern man's comfort:
I am a hedonist and materialist, and proud of it.
I eat, shit, piss, fart, and, most importantly, fuck, as do all animals. I am no more and no less than an animal, and that is the only thing I aspire to be.

You misunderstood my " eating, pissing, fucking,..." statement. I said those things to dis-enchant the human being, to get his head out of the clouds - not because those things are ends to me.

Satyr: "The modern man's comfort:
I am a hedonist and materialist, and proud of it.
I eat, shit, piss, fart, and, most importantly, fuck, as do all animals. I am no more and no less than an animal, and that is the only thing I aspire to be."

You sound like a psychological Christian with this apparent repugnance towards baseness and hedonism ( as if man is somehow transcendent of animality ).

Fuck balance, man. All great men of history were extreme! This is where you fall on your face. You are a man of balance - A man sitting on the fence. This is mediocrity. A noble man is an extreme man; he doesn't fall into the center where the herd is - he rises to the top of the mountain - to extreme elevations.

Nothing more to tell you, boy.
You are truly unbalanced.
You keep backtracking, scrambling to correct your previous stupidity.

With time it will cost you dearly, if it is honest and not a ploy to draw attention...you being a classic narcissist, and all.
Like a true modern words, for you, are detached from reality, making them interchangeable, void of substance, with no reference to anything but back to more words.
Positive is negative, negative is positive, balance in imbalance, intelligence is stupidity, symmetry is asymmetry, man is woman ...and so on.
You are all over the place ...very chaotic, very imbalanced, very insane.

A crazy animal in the wild faces a natural end.

You being unable to define balance makes you a victim of your own farting, eating, pissing, fucking ...shitting.

The fence?
HA!!!

I took out the 'balance is imbalance' statement because I knew that you would take it out of context and focus your entire response around it. And I was correct in assuming so. The coward cherry picks minor details and blows them out of proportion - negating the more potent and substantial information.

Yes, you are a man on the fence - a man of balance. A man of mediocrity.

Balance in a churning sea, you imbecile?
A surfer does not sit on a fence ...he rides the wave.
Nothing solid...

If you are an example of a "great man" then we are truly doomed.

At this point I'm a capitalist, according to d(69, a monetary elitist, according to the Torn-Annus, and now "undecided" according to a brain-dead youth who thinks the end of the world is immanent and that he will fair well in the outcome.
I'm also a fascist, ill, vulgar, and right wing...and still nobody has ever discredited my positions but only assaulted me.
It's been fun.


Fence, dear boy?
I am firmly pro-life, pro world, pro reality.
I'm one of a few who has a stated, clear, posted on-line, cohesive, ordered, consistent, world-view.
A fence sitter is you, turd, who says one thing and then another, and then does not know what he means...and then he reconsiders.
Pro-Chaos is wishy-washy...this or that...one day here, the other there...disordered, mad, inconsistent, unpredictable, disordered, ambiguous, insane.
A fence sitter is always living in the future, the beyond, the yet to be. He is always in expectation of what will be better.

Life is ordering, balancing, constantly adjusting to change.
Every human cooperative unity establishes hierarchies and authorities, and has its own elites as these are defined by their shares principles and ideals.

I think I am done.
Now you keep on farting, shiting, fucking, and eating, boy.
You are the future: manimal.

Fuck-off, will ya?
Go and break something...start killing. Do something that adheres to your stated ideals.

Primal Rage wrote:

I took out the 'balance is imbalance' statement because I knew that you would take it out of context and focus your entire response around it. And I was correct in assuming so. The coward cherry picks minor details and blows them out of proportion - negating the more potent and substantial information.

Yes, you are a man on the fence - a man of balance. A man of mediocrity.

You are a coward who does not have the guts to stand by and defend or take responsibility for what you said.

That's because you don't treat this place as a philosophy forum where words have Precise meanings, significance. To the Mediocre, this is a dating ground, and in that too you fail. Anyone who actually believed Might is Right will want to up the battle,,, not ask the other favours to downplay to his level.

You are pathetic.

Lyssa wrote:

Primal Rage wrote:

I took out the 'balance is imbalance' statement because I knew that you would take it out of context and focus your entire response around it. And I was correct in assuming so. The coward cherry picks minor details and blows them out of proportion - negating the more potent and substantial information.

Yes, you are a man on the fence - a man of balance. A man of mediocrity.

You are a coward who does not have the guts to stand by and defend or take responsibility for what you said.

That's because you don't treat this place as a philosophy forum where words have Precise meanings, significance. To the Mediocre, this is a dating ground, and in that too you fail. Anyone who actually believed Might is Right will want to up the battle,,, not ask the other favours to downplay to his level.

You are pathetic.

Did you notice how much attention Echo received, then you and then resonevometion?
It's what they crave...the invitation to the den of dimwits, the asylum form where the next world will come, was meant for the girls.

Satyr,you are so predictable. It's ironic because you admire characters like Hannibal and the Joker who are supposed to be complex. And don't give me this bullshit that you are pro-life, pro-reality. Moron, you use this forum to vent. And your whole nihilism and memes rhetoric is nothing novel. All regurgitation. Your works here will not be remembered. You will never be a Nietzsche, a Shopenhaur, or even an Evola. You are just a pathetic old man that is trying to become immortal via his philosophical drivel. This is all you will ever be, Satyr. Your son will probably be the same. I'm done with you. Have fun with your 'balance' and ' nobility'.

*Ouch*

Dat huit
  

Primal Slut prostitutes everything.

Girls are cum-receptacles just like his mother.

Words are tools for banging chicks, and if someone takes him on on it, he refuses to accept responsibility like a man, and shames the other,,, and yet he'll go about calling himself a Man.

Phil. forums are places for compensating attention deficits,,,, poke and provoke and you've proved you are a worthy contender for the spot for "I am Seen now",

Anarchy itself was to connote a virile view of passionate individuality, but in the mouths of sluts, is abused as 'philosophy' to mean living like decadents and animal hippies and passing on genes like feces at the end of a mind-numbing orgy...

The slut deserves everything he gets,,, exactly the kind of girls and the kind of children he will beget.

That is Justice for All.

  

Holy shit, Bane and the Joker working together, teaming up.

Ghidorah wrote:

Holy shit, Bane and the Joker working together, teaming up.

Together they can accomplish miracles.

Let chaos rule!!!!

Well...partially.
I still want my shit intact.


-------------------

See what happens when little boys confuse a metaphor, an artistic symbol, a caricature, like the Joker, Batman, or Hannibal Lecter, for something actual and real?
It's the same shit that happens when they confuse the word for the phenomenon.

Primal Rage wrote:

Satyr,you are so predictable. It's ironic because you admire characters like Hannibal and the Joker who are supposed to be complex. And don't give me this bullshit that you are pro-life, pro-reality. Moron, you use this forum to vent. And your whole nihilism and memes rhetoric is nothing novel. All regurgitation. Your works here will not be remembered. You will never be a Nietzsche, a Shopenhaur, or even an Evola. You are just a pathetic old man that is trying to become immortal via his philosophical drivel. This is all you will ever be, Satyr. Your son will probably be the same. I'm done with you. Have fun with your 'balance' and ' nobility'.

Dishonest projections always throwing dirt to deflect their own fears - the fear of mortality, being forgotten, not noticed, not remembered... exactly like the other slut Anus.

And everyone reading this post would know Nowhere has Satyr Ever even hinted at wanting to be a Nietzsche, a Schopenhauer, or an Evola... in fact, he's always been about finding your own way. Everyone knows his videos where he broke off with the MRAs precisely because he refused to be another Guru or Cult Leader offering solutions to weak baby boys like slut here and anus, craving for solutions and easy answers and that pat on the back to give these turds motivation.
The spurned and neglected babies now throw angry tantrums.

Lets not forget how the Slut claimed superiority of his genetics to his LOOKS - and that's what his family ancestry and he'll amount to and remain - a good looking Prostitute. And drugs will help him when he ages old and doesn't even have those Looks going for him anymore to win him value... the turd will seek to die in an encounter and call his suicidal nihilism "bravery" and "dying in battle like a warrior".

What would the weak do without such magnificent and soothing self-deceptions, the lies they console themselves...

Lie-ssa, you again?

Speaking of sluts, was it not you who glorified the slut? I do recall you and Echo going at each other's necks on this one. Look at your avatar, honey. That's not sluttish? Showing of tits and legs.

You do live in India, yes? The world capital of rape. Maybe that's what you need. Maybe it will restore a sense of genuine femininity in you.

Primal Rage wrote:

Lie-ssa, you again?

Speaking of sluts, was it not you who glorified the slut?

Slut, first tell me, if really intend to use the word "glorify" again? Think for sometime. Decide first if you really want to stick with that word,,, then we'll talk.

Quote :

Look at your avatar, honey. That's not sluttish? Showing of tits and legs.

Tell me if there's any difference to you between renaissance nude arts for instance and porn?

Nude and Naked - any difference?

A slut poses with the definite intention of seducing someone,,, while the other kind, hoars like me just bristle with mirth and is enough to come across as seductive.
Slut,, aren't you inviting me to the bathroom yet - you know, for those real tuitions? You kidder....

Quote :

You do live in India, yes? The world capital of rape. Maybe that's what you need. Maybe it will restore a sense of genuine femininity in you.

Are you miffed I wont drool over you even if you threw your shorts down? Does my indifference get your panties into a knot? Calm down. I doubt even a rape with even assistance from your friends can restore you as a man... what's left of you? A slut begging to be used ha

Bitch, if I could count the number of men masturbating on rape fantasies *because they are so impotent,,, I would need more than two hands...

F--- rape. Can you pelt stones at a poor little mangy mutt? How far can you *really take *might is right?
If you can, then you are no Human and no Man, and might is right doesn't apply to you.
If you cannot, then you have no right to go about saying Might is right unless you are a Lie-cy li'l tick, a fleeing flea...
This is what happens when you literalize allegories...

Lice-ssa, yes I stand by word " glorify". You glorified the slut as she is not subject to the effects of shaming. She is, sexually, liberated. All of this is indicative of your secret fascination with the feminist ethos.

Nude and Naked are synonymous, retard. You can try to make excuses for your harlotry all you want, at the end of the day, a harlot is still a harlot.

I can take might is right pretty far if I want to.

What I find fascinating about this is how brave females act in front of the computer and keyboard. Yet, in reality, if confronted in a dark alley by this male she hurls insults at online, she would be silent like a church mouse. Satyr does this same shit. He even says himself that he is polite and nice to people in person. But if you see the type of shit he pulls here online with people, it just goes to show that his politeness is a mask covering his inner cowardice to express himself in person. This is the result of sheltering - allowing genetic filth the opportunity to exist in artificial systems where they can have the illusion of fitness.

A clever hunter wears the skins of cattle to make the hunt successful...only a stupid one runs screaming in the forest, alerting all the animals that a crazy one is there.
Balance means masculine in control of the feminine ...not its obliteration.
Hyper-masculinity is a symptom of insecurity, usually it is produced by an absence of a father figure resulting in a boy's overcompensation of what he later is missing but does not fully understand.

I cannot wait for the future ...when you reach your forties, and you look back at this shit.

Did you even understand a word?
Let me give you another hint:
No frontiers.

Good luck in jail.

In human groups, because of the participation of both males and females in them, a leader is not always the strongest, fastest, most pretty.
The mind has proven to be a far greater power than anything as primitive as that.

A lion bends to a man's will, though it is big and powerful with big teeth, and a magnificent mane; a stallion is broken by the human will, using cunning, observation, analysis.

Only a madman wrestles a lion or runs after a wild stallion.

You always get these moderns coming out of the woodwork when a word is spoken which sparks their imagination, letting those hidden anxieties run free.

Hyper-Masculine boys, having lived in an emasculating system, and with no contact with a male figure to connect them to a heritage to draw strength and identify from, settle upon this caricatured, pop-cultural compensation, ideal, trying to imitate the gestures and image, the personas.

The one surrendered to their own emasculation try to find pride in their castration, embracing their social status as a sign of love.
Love becomes the only name of God still being used.
The shared inebriation, which must be protected from the revealing light.

Yet, it is fear that makes love such a potent force of self-repression.
Fear of being alone, of being left out of the herd, of facing the world without a supporting hand; fear of losing a mentor, a guidance counsellor, a sexual partner, a vehicle for one's genes, a connection to the social network one has grow dependent upon.

It is this anxiety of having the motives uncovered that makes these pretentious cowards such passionate defenders of love's, hypothetical, purity.
The term 'love' must not have any connection to the real, because this would degrade its sanctity to the level of a base, survival tool...and nature is what these "enlightened" ones dream of escaping.

No motives must be attributed to pure, holy, love, otherwise it loses its magical power to numb, and to seduce.

Year after year they search...day after day they are disappointed.
And who is to blame, for the victims or natural selection, but the world itself?

Primal Rage wrote:

Lice-ssa,

so original...

This is why you are an eternal slut - so easy to mind-rape you, impress myself on that head of yours... like so many others have im-pressed on you.

Quote :

[yes I stand by word " glorify". You glorified the slut as she is not subject to the effects of shaming. She is, sexually, liberated. All of this is indicative of your secret fascination with the feminist ethos.

I performed an "exegesis" on the Whore as a metaphor for life and the uninhibited component within us that is never ashamed to embrace itself in its totality, in its honest nudity - from the great and the pleasant to the terrible and painful.
The Whore is what acquaints ourself with our self... a knowing thyself.

To the feminized like you, every self-respecting woman would appear a feminist. Your feminized materialist brain is intimidated by real women and compensates by lowering them as sluts, good-for-bangings, and womb-machines.

When your Primal Passions have slowed down, re-read.

Quote :

Nude and Naked are synonymous, retard. You can try to make excuses for your harlotry all you want, at the end of the day, a harlot is still a harlot.

Gibberoni, did you consult with your guru Eulogy before writing that? Big mistake. Even Anus will disagree with you.
you are still in kindergarten.

Quote :

I can take might is right pretty far if I want to.

Yes. I am sure it seems that way right after you've read N. saying something on "cruelty".... instant gist formulaized...

Remember, N. also despised "petty politics" and "petty criminals". Likewise, these "petty cruelties" is not the kind of cruelty he was affirming.

You do not become a man, hurting dogs or raping women.
Instant excitability or what you have stupidly assumed is your "Passion", dumbslut, is weak nerves, is Exhaustion, is a weary spirit that can no longer resist acting. To react to the slightest stimuli is a weakness, is a passive unmanliness.
Your comforting ignorance calls this Passion and Strength of Youth. You are a weak, tired old soul who can't help being a Reactionary... and that's why you recklessly use the "old" age namecallings to shame others. You are a Slave.

Quote :

What I find fascinating about this is how brave females act in front of the computer and keyboard. Yet, in reality, if confronted in a dark alley by this male she hurls insults at online, she would be silent like a church mouse.

Turd, I was saying, even if you raped me or gang-raped me with your friend's help, being the emasculated nut you are,,, when you manage to do it,,, you lower yourself to the level of an animal when you do it, nevermind my state. This does not make you a man, this regresses you into an Ape. How much strength can it take to simply physically overpower something beneath your size? Idiot. What is that bravery to show your machoism beating up a small dog or a weak girl? F---ing Idiot. What is 'Man' in him anyway? Rape, Plunder, Pillage have occured among the Vikings, but these were Male excursions, not Manly ones.
When you rape a female, you only exhibit you are a Male [a distinction even animals have],, you don't prove you are a Man, an individual with a personality.
These transgressions too were in the perspective women were seen by the Vikings as wealth like cattle or goddesses to be appropriated as proper-ty, not powerless f--- toys, stupid.

Quote :

Satyr does this same shit. He even says himself that he is polite and nice to people in person. But if you see the type of shit he pulls here online with people, it just goes to show that his politeness is a mask covering his inner cowardice to express himself in person. This is the result of sheltering - allowing genetic filth the opportunity to exist in artificial systems where they can have the illusion of fitness.

You are a full-on Retard. RETARD. Do you not understand the internet is last slowly-disappearing frontier where one can still speak their mind honestly before forums like these will be censored away; in real life one is forced to be polite.
And moron, politeness and respect is to be earned, not demanded like charity - which you lost, the day you two-facedly went backstabbing about,,, saying here how much you "respect" him, and saying on ILP what a moron he was --- that showed what "respect" meant to you, and that's ditto the respect you get. The one who personalizes this constantly is You. Get over it already and stop stooping to childish "he likes me/he hates me" kind of unphilosophical gibberish.
If you have the eyes to see and the ears to hear, then take notes and make good of your errors he's patient enough to be engaging and pointing out.

Remember, a real warrior is one who wishes his opponent be at his best to fight the best war,,, and does not try to bring him down with nit-picky name callings and juvenile mud-slinging... that is what slaves do. like you.

Lyssa wrote: " Turd, I was saying, even if you raped me or gang-raped me with your friend's help, being the emasculated nut you are,,, when you manage to do it,,, you lower yourself to the level of an animal when you do it, nevermind my state. This does not make you a man, this regresses you into an Ape."

I lower myself to the level of an animal? We are animals! This regresses me to an ape? We are apes! You see, you are a psychological Christian; you believe that man is not an ape - that he is above animality. You expose your antipathy for nature in your words, Lyssa. How very nihilistic of you. How very Judeo-Christian of you.

I didn't go about stabbing satyr in the back. Those pictures I posted of Hannibal were done so in friendly humor - not malevolence. Stop being so sensitive, little girl.

Satyr drew first blood. I tried to be patient with the old man, but he kept pushing his luck. Hell, I even apologized to him to make amends because I, at one point, was genuinely interested in what he had to say, and didn't want to be on bad grounds, but you know what - fuck it. I don't forgive people twice. If someone disrespects me, I disrespect them.

Take Satyr's cock out of your luscious mouth and take a breather. Maybe it will allow enough oxygen to enter your system so you can realize the reality of your sycophancy.

You only see what you want to see. Life is about adaption, evolutionary dead ends are destined to die out. Absolve your self of resentment and attachments to see things clearly. Then notice how you imagine a future in which money has no power because you have no money. How you sub-consciously see Satyr as your better, try to equalize him to your level as a form of self elevation, indicative that you are of low self-esteem. You can drag others down into your pit, still wont change the fact that your in a pit. See self knowledge is of the highest form.

I stand with Marcus Aurelius.