Gender Fluidity / Transgender / Cis

[You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]

Loud, self-serving turds venting on Vine.

Many of these people are fat and physically repulsive, hence getting involved in these subcultures provides a means of drawing attention to themselves. Others appear of indeterminate sexual identity, suggesting the root causes for this are genetic not social or environmental.



More can be found on the YouTube channel 'Common Filth'.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Transsexual is a modern word and the concept is nothing new. Weininger described them as "contra-sexuals". You seem to a bit lacking in your understanding of hermaphrodism and gender morphology.
This article was Weininger's last opus. He committed suicide at age 23, and he wrote a document exploring the genetics of gender and the female mind.
I haven't read all of it yet but the first 6 or so chapters are very true so far.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

He was a genius of his time, and it's sad that his work was released 100 years ago yet modern scholars seem to be so ignorant about the spectrum of gender and the difference between male and female minds.

Satyr wrote:

Transgender is the next step towards asexuality.
Feminization is also part of this.

asexuality is an elimination of the male/female categories, reducing the sexual category of human (or species), to an abstraction....like love.

I wouldn't say it is the root cause though, only a byproduct of sexual strafication.

There are two forces at play here. The first force is a world that worships the gender binary and gender roles. This force reduces the transgender and forces them to conform to arbitrary rules.

The second force is the castration force, or modern feminism. This encourages sexual stratification, villianization of the male role and abuse and mistreatment of men. This force encourages the transgender to not conform to arbitrary rules, since the rules do not seem to yeild any profit for the transgender.

Therefore, transgender is a mix of forces, a result of the world as well as natural DNA forces. I am not sure where the asexuality trend started and who is to blame. It could partially be angry lesbians who are to blame, and abusive rapist men who cause women to go on the militant role to make the whole world miserable as some kind of vengeance campaign to castrate and make all males as loveless as possible.

I would also like to add that modern transsexuals have become a bit retarded with their word policing. Most of them have had rough lives and they want to take out their frustrations in ridiculous ways. For example, many modern transsexuals have become quite ridiculous, taking offense to common terms like "getting a sex-change" or flipping out over simple fat-jokes. (Apparently saying one is "born-male" or getting a "sex-change" is offensive and innapropriate to the anal-retentive transgender. Of course they offer no replacement words. "gender reassignment surgery" is not polite either, and the word "transsexual" is innappropriate to use around them nowadays and "offensive".

There is a such thing as flux however I don't think everyone is a two-spirit or hermaphrodite. The concept of two-spirit requires also the concept of there being a such thing as a boy and girl to flux between...otherwise the word would be called one-spirit or zero-spirit. While noone is 100 percent woman or 100 percent heterosexual, these are approximations that usually work for the majority of the population. While I believe two-spirits should be called whatever pronouns they are feeling at the moment, it is ludicrous to deny the notion that there are such things as boys and girls (other wise, they would be zero-spirits, or complete asexuals.)

Okay so I read the article Lys and it seems the author (chicks on the right) is boldy distorting the truth (as women love to do.) The school is not actually teaching that there are no such things as boys or girls, only that gender is a spectrum (which it is.) Leave it to a woman to distort the the truth, making bold and flaming article descriptions, much like tabloids - much ado about nothing, and little to do with any actual occurence.

What does it mean that there is a gender?
Gender is not the same as the sexes, the sexual-dimorphism of man, that's a categorization based on a phenomenon, based on observations of biology.

They differentiate between sexual practices and gender identity.
Sexual practices are an act. That's again different from this gender identity.

It doesn't look like a duck - (sexual dimorphism)
It doesn't behave like a duck - (the act-ion)
But it talks like, well, it says it's a duck - (My name is Something, Gender-Something)

How can this be?
Since there is no body distinct from a psyche and vice versa, it's that the sexual-dimorphism is weakening (rise of asexuality) and that what we do is not in accordance with what we think, double-think and so on (rise of schizophrenia).

Human is a reproduction category.
Like all species this species designates a population that can exchange genetic memories.
Later to evolve into an exchange of memetic memories.

Male/Female are sub-categories of the sexual category human.
Each sexual types plays a sexual role within the reproduction cycles of what we call humanity.
As such both males and females are combinations of the masculine/feminine roles.
The degree to which one is dominated by either is determined by hormones, and, conditioning, nurturing, which may inhibit one genetic predisposition, and accentuate the other, which is effective when the predisposition intervened upon is weak to begin with.

Genetic mutations may also warp this predispositions, producing individual dominated by the feminine psychology within a masculine body.
Such mutations are unfit, biologically speaking, and are weeded out of the gene pool, particularly when they cannot replicate themselves but must rely of random mutations to come about - parasitical genes.

In nature these mutations are fewer since fewer genes manage to replicate themselves, but in human environments where even retards can have babies, mutations multiply, exponentially, in time.

Satyr wrote:

Human is a reproduction category.
Like all species this species designates a population that can exchange genetic memories.
Later to evolve into an exchange of memetic memories.

Male/Female are sub-categories of the sexual category human.
Each sexual types plays a sexual role within the reproduction cycles of what we call humanity.
As such both males and females are combinations of the masculine/feminine roles.
The degree to which one is dominated by either is determined by hormones, and, conditioning, nurturing, which may inhibit one genetic predisposition, and accentuate the other, which is effective when the predisposition intervened upon is weak to begin with.

Genetic mutations may also warp this predispositions, producing individual dominated by the feminine psychology within a masculine body.
Such mutations are unfit, biologically speaking, and are weeded out of the gene pool, particularly when they cannot replicate themselves but must rely of random mutations to come about - parasitical genes.

In nature these mutations are fewer since fewer genes manage to replicate themselves, but in human environments where even retards can have babies, mutations multiply, exponentially, in time.

I'm not so sure it's a result of retards having babies. The world is flooded with xeno-estrogens and left over pharmaceutical pills. The chemicals have cause fish in anartica to change sex to female. I believe these chemicals can and do alter a male-fetus to become feminized.

However, chemicals aside...

Feminized males can often dwell in the masculine long enough during reproduction (for example, they act feminine most of the time, but during the act of sex their testosterone surges and they flux to masculine mode.)

I don't really think there is a statistical correlation between hoodrats and retards having gay and trans babies (they simply have more babies, therefore more chance of them being gay or trans, but no actual statistical correlation.)

When weakness is propagated and protected from culling, or natural processes of eliminating inferior genes, what do you expect?

When feminine traits are idealized and worshiped, placed on ta pedestal, and male traits are ridiculed, called evil, what do you expect?

When more inferior males are permitted access to the gene pool, because of monogamy, and the glorification of feminine traits, what do you expect?

So, retards having babies is not a factor?
Two retards reproducing when they would not have in natural environments, is not a factor?
Two retards reproducing and the offspring being given protection even from honesty, growing up to believe he, she, deserves respect and to pass on his/her genes is not a factor?

Mutations sheltered and then compounded by the addition of further mutations, is not a factor?

This masculine flux, you describe, is beta-male psychology.
You are describing covert masculinity in a world where it is prohibited from openly expressing itself, other than in cage matches, prison cells, and sporting events.
I'm not talking about men pretending to be effete because females have been trained to consider them preferable, but about males who are effete, no matter what and under what circumstances.

In order for this discussion to continue, please describe what is masculine, and what is not.

Currently what I define as retards populating and current population trends are women going for abusive males who treat them like dirt and beat them all the time, assholes and jocks, etc.

While I wouldn't label the asshole jock incredibly masculine, I wouldn't really label him effete, either.

Girls don't really go for intellectual philosopher types, since they crave instant gratification (except every moment of their lives is spent doing the opposite, living a lifestyle where every action and movement they perform is contrary to this goal, instant gratification.)

Intellectual philosopher genetic types range from androgenous to heavily masculine. Your descriptions of the masculine, cage matches, prisons, and sport events, whilst masculine, is not something I'd consider a worthy addition to the gene pool, and something I'd associate with the retard populace. And in fact, such masculine persons are steadily and continuingly contributing (degrading) the current population. (Though with the unfairness in law nowadays, I wouldn't say that all people who are in prison are retards or have unworthy DNA.)

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

All you have to do is ask:
Why did two sexual types evolve, and what particular traits would either require to successfully carry out this role, within natural, austere, environments?
We can get into how and why man-made environments redirect, and often contradict this genetic role.

I did not get into this in the definition but what traits would make a male fit, in the genetic sense, requiring him to prove himself worthy of passing on his genes, to a female who is a genetic gatekeeper (filtering mechanism) and to then protect them, or pass on the tools to be successful themselves?

Consider the sexual act itself.
The penetration, the being penetrated, which separates male from female - going all the way down to the sperm/ovum dynamic; the thinking outside the box, as in outside the social context that would enable a male to challenge the authority he wants to replace...and so on.
Also explaining why males dominate in the creative fields, and in all disciplines requiring innovation, and challenging the norms.

I am fairly sure Weinenger's last opus answers this question of yours.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
I haven't read all of it yet but the first 6 or so chapters are very true so far. Tell me what you think of it.

Females, "gate"keepers as they may be (lol) usually do not possess the required intelligience to sustain a species on their own. Forgive me if I am sexist but natural selection is not an intelligient process, and often species go extinct due to the females poor mating preferences (for example, Ecmandu talks about a species of elk which has heavy horns. The females are infatuated with the wrong traits (heavy horns) which causes it to go extinct.)

Simple mating preferences are observed in human specimens. Females seem to value brawn over brains, which is odd considering brains are humans most valued trait. It is sad to see so many creative geniuses lead lives of unrequited love and celibacy, because as smart as they were they were unable to solve the biggest secret - the secret to a woman's heart. It's no real secret though, women are chaos, and chaos craves abuse and masochism. Women choose men who abandon them and don't make sure their young are safe or teach kids anything - this is not evolutionary beneficial behavior. Unfortunately, the fate of evolution is left in the hands of the gatekeepers - womenkind, and this is a very scary thought indeed.

I am in agreement with Weininger.

Different species specialize in different survival tactics.
For the elk proving one's self able to survive with a severe physical burden signals a male's fitness.

Human females, when not infected by memes, favor symmetry in both mind and body.
Symmetry of body is beauty - symmetry of mind is intelligence.
Physical (body) being the inherited past, and mind being how this past interacts in the present, in presence.

A sense of humor signals creativity and thinking outside the social norms, outside the average, the dull, the impregnated by a meme to the point of docility.

When a Nihilistic meme, such as Modernity, favors feminine traits, the females are torn between nature and nurture: their innate inclinations and their pragmatic considerations.
A Nihilistic meme is contra nature, and so creates artificial environments, in time detaching from reality.
See definition of [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

All this has been covered in The Feminization of Mankind.  
Females are essentially genetic filtering agencies.
Their nature evolved to function as tolerant, social, particularly for a big-brained species, and discriminating, even if they only sense it intuitively.

What a "genius" like Ecmandu fails to consider is that nature does not give a shit about the survival of an individual, nor about its well-being, or its intelligence.  
If intelligence proves to be detrimental to survival, when it reaches a certain level, or when the brain is freed from nature, and it wallows in boredom and introspection, and self-doubt, then it filters out intelligence.

For the elk, as with the peacock, the signals are meant to convey fitness, even if the male will eventually bight the dust.
Males are the expendable sex, dear.
See drones.

In safe environments they become superfluous.
Ironically it is males themselves that create such environments....so consider this part of the sperm wars.
Take over and then construct an environment where challenging authority is evil, bad, stupid...and so on.
Almost as clever as fading into the background, behind the curtain, and then pretending you are the victim, and not the wizard of oz.
almost as clever as taking away an entire class, the middle-class, to create the illusion of parity.
Almost as clever to maintain the middle-class, so as to keep a buffer between the impoverished the the elites - why Capitalism is a more clever system, and Communism is stupid and naive, like Christianity selling an ideal not meant for the human species, or for any species existing in reality.

I forgot to mention that males have a tendency to spread their sperm everywhere and impregnate multiple women. The gene to be careless about one's young is spread through simple mathematics.

Males who reproduce with 50 odd women do not stick around to look and teach their babies. They abandon their women. Through mathematics this gene is spread further and further. Their babies grow with the genetic mentality of doing the same thing, even if they grow up as women, they still have feelings they still wish to abandon their babies (thus we have such wide acceptance of abortion.) This is why women have low attention spans and are for the most part, appear caring at first but quickly turn apathetic (because they are just like the men who appear caring at first, in order to impregnate the female, then turn apathetic.)

By and large this genetic trait is largely uncountered by intellectual memes. Women fight a losing battle between nature and nuture and always give up their bodies to the guy who doesn't care about them and will not teach their young anything of value.

Satyr wrote:

In safe environments they become superfluous.

This is true. Studies show that women are most attracted to their mates during horror movies or time of stress. Why? Because women naturally developed an attraction to men who make them feel safe - if only for an instant.

I believe semi-communism serves as a buffer for a broken environment which punishes positive traits and rewards and benefits negative traits. Many of the middle class and elites are retards, and often philosopher intellectual types are screwed over by the elites (for instance, the man who invented the synthetic diamond was rewarded a 10 dollar severance check, whilst the retards no doubt celebrated with their millions fucking hundreds of prostitutes.) Semi-communism serves as a bit of a buffer to make sure the wrong people don't die, but full-on communism offers no emotional incentive to do anything.

It is my belief (and those may criticism me if they will) is that having a bit of an ego is a good thing sometimes. Being the best that you can be, competition, gets things done. Wanting to do something better than someone else can breeds creativity and work output. I doubt we'd have modern plumbing if ancient men sat around with no egos and no desire to out-do anyone else.

In reference to the original topic theme, femininity and mutations, natural female habits involve them having sex with other females. This would wrap around to also having sex with feminine males. Feminine males may or may not have positive survival traits, with natural selection it's always a roll of the dice. However leaving the fate of the universe to simple mathematics, eg. males who spread the rape and abandon gene, I would say is less favorable. Everyone has the rape and abandon gene inside of them already, and if someone (say, a feminist) says she has no such gene, she is lying (it's what women do.) In a few years we will probably see humans undergo a pathetic attempt to change their own genetics, which will no doubt fail for the worse. This is because no doubt the humans in charge of the experiment will probably be total retards. Then, because of the disastrous results, the other humans will whine and complain and say that genetic manipulation (like cloning) is "immoral" and try to ban it, and of course, through their sensationalist propaganda they will suceed. We won't see any "progress" from this method for at least 10-100 years.

Now you are getting into the heart of why paternalism was necessary to curb male sexuality and more so female promiscuity.
Paternalism creates a band of brothers, a brotherhood, by controlling and sharing females.
Of course females will resent this, but without it no civilization is possible.
In modern times the new method is more sophisticated....feminization, entertainment, religion, the nihilistic memes, idealizing the emasculated, moron, with hyper-masculine displays that make him look silly.  

Women prefer the dominant male, but, as you said, they are driven to sample.
Sample inferior genes, if this offers them a social advantage.
The social advantage can then increase their chances of sampling superior genes, ergo the nice-guy as the carpet phenomenon.
Still, the dominant male will pass on his genes multiple times and the inferior one fewer, if any.

You have to place this in more austere, unforgiving, environments, where even beta males are fit enough to survive long enough to make a bid at for the ovum.
In current, Modern, artificially maintained superfluous, environments, the dumb are protected from their own stupidity - in fact they are favored, because a simpleton is more easily seduced, manipulated, and integrated within society.
You've come across many on ILP.

Now the institution, is the representation of the alpha-male, with whomever lies behind it, and the beta can be a symbol of it, as can a woman, or even a child, or a retard like George W.
We are now entering into memetic reproduction, where instead of sperm passing on genetic memories, we have words passing on ideologies.
The alpha does not care about genetics, but only memetics, and so freeing females to fuck with whomever, as a right, becomes a Modern solution to a demographic problem.
Here, some conspiracy theorists will insert a hidden agenda aimed, specifically, at Indo-Euroepan males.

Whoever is behind the institution sells what he does not buy, and so although multiculturalism and liberalism is the social ideals, he lives by more ancient, natural, rules.

It begins, the gradual propaganda, the media assault...slowly Transgender will not be a sexual dysfunction, but another life choice or.....they were born that way.
Like all the mentally challenged.

Sexual identity as a fashion trend.
Identity, a garment one wears and then takes off.
No function for sex...it just happened and man can do with it as he pleases.....like his orifices, or any of his organs.

A happy family means going by [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]...

Lyssa wrote:

A happy family means going by [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]...

Women have the minds of young children. A modern man must accomodate his wife's demands, lest she leave him in a fit of fury. This brings happiness, for a moment. Then the wife complains about her husband not being assertive enough and sleeps with a black man. Then she blames the man for the divorce, and recieves custody of the children.

Naturally a man would also obey the whims of a child, because his wife, is too, a child.

Satyr wrote:

It begins, the gradual propaganda, the media assault...slowly Transgender will not be a sexual dysfunction, but another life choice or.....they were born that way.
Like all the mentally challenged.

Sexual identity as a fashion trend.
Identity, a garment one wears and then takes off.
No function for sex...it just happened and man can do with it as he pleases.....like his orifices, or any of his organs.

It is not quite a life choice, when xeno-estrogens are pushed into the environment, and males are taught to have little to no value to women.

Though the human species has natural two-spirits, in this day and age males are so reviled, so unwanted, treated so poorly, that the desire too go full-female (that is, abandon reproductive capabilities, and abandon the human species altogether) is at an all time high. The two-spirits will lie and deny any and all male traits, in order to distance themselves from social ridicule by the feminists.

I believe, the reason why some males are attracted to trans women, rather than the average cis female, is because transwomen embody the ancient "spark" of femininity. When they look at her, they see years and years of their own repressed history...they feel the spark of a female who actually wants to be a female, a female who has the ancient spark, but also the spunk and twisted cleverness of a male.

In a dry desert of angry, homely women, it's no mystery. Just look at their faces, many trans women have chubbier cheeks than a cis. This is because estrogen is at an all time low. As sad as it sounds, the modern woman is actually less womanly than a trans woman.

The moderns truly have accomplished equality. Its a "melting pot" with so much chaos, chemicals, and intermixing of memes, that now some women think like men. Some women think like women. Some men think like women. Women have the spirits of men. Some men have the spirits of women.
And everyone is miserable.
Intellectually, almost everyone these days is completely stunted.
Socially, its a herd.
Genderwise, most everyone is miserable, most of all, the transgenders. Fighting a losing battle against their selves, trying to come to terms with their own freakishness, the conflicted, broken mutated nature of themselves, and the world around them, and somehow rectify it, in a world gone mad, full of chaos, filled with heifers. Sometimes I get my kicks while I watch them bicker amongst themselves over word usage, some of them declaring that they were meant to be born that way, as if it was some sort of identity, or blessing, even though they despise their own body. Most of the time I pity them, after all, they are no different than the rest, simple minded heifers with no unity amongst themselves, no warpath, no drive to maintain a status quo other than the lower rafters who petition the alpha male establishment for crumbs, when they get around to it, of course.

It's a male who dresses like a woman and has probably breast implants and takes hormones to alter his body chemistry.
Before that he was a male who was body building and probably taking hormones to achieve a certain look and receive a certain attention.
Not that different in that regard.