Satyrnalium

Re-Connecting mind to world begins by re-turning words to their original utility as this connection between mind/body, the subjective with the objective, and the idea(l) with the real.

Words like 'sex', 'love', 'morality' 'humanity', 'god' are brought down to earth, from the ideological theoretical ether of the mind's self-comforting idealism.
Each word creases to be arbitrarily defined, or used by liars and hypocrites to exploit human needs and anxieties.

The world dictates the word's meaning.
The dictionary dictates its communicative conventional definition.
Symbol/words acts as the connector of gene to meme, and both in relation to reality, as this is experienced by all.
This idealization of language is what is called mystification, or making divine.

'Love' is demystified when it is reconnected to a behaviour associated with the feeling, and so are all emotions.
The same for 'morality' and the species identifier 'humanity'.
More importantly the same can be done to the word 'self', as a word referring to an individual identity.

Cowards and hypocrites do not like this, because it returns them to judging themselves and their place in world using objective criteria beyond their ability o change, forcing them to compensate.
They chose to life, as a way of compensating, hoping to convince others with their hypocrisy.

But we who know will not be convinced with such feminine tactics.
We know what language is, why it evolves and how it is useful, and we also know how it can be used to corrupt and misdirect.
This knowledge is our advantage, our power. it makes us immune to liars and hypocrites and better able to appreciate the superior, distinguishing it from the inferior.

Let's take the word 'human' as an easier example...
I take the word, a symbol, relating to a linguistic convention, and find its dictionary definition.
I then look into the world to see what I can find to connect the dictionary definition to a phenomenon, to something real.
I do not refuse to connect it to world, claiming any connection is just as good; I do not connect it to my mind to a fantastic abstraction; I do not redefine the word to accommodate my desire.

I do not connect it arbitrarily.
Knowing that words can be used metaphorically, I first connect the dictionary definition to something I can see, and feel, and hear....something I can experience and that is independent of me and my hopes and ideals.  

Then I proceed to do the same with more complex words, like 'love' and 'morality'.They are complex because they refer to behaviours, to interactions and not to physical presence.  
I do this with as many words as possible, clarifying my mind, becoming lucid, even if more challenged by the connections - the meanings - because each connection has implications that affect us personally.

Once we do this we proceed to find words that cannot be connected externally. Those we categorize as ideologies, theories, abstractions - noumena with no reference to phenomena, but refer back to other noumnea, that are found in another's mind, one's own mind, or in text, as the codification of mind.

So we have...

The last category is is the trickiest the one charlatans use to exploit human idiocy and desperation.
A noumenon, an abstraction, an idea, can refer to a synthesis of phenomenon, that which can be experienced, and noumenon, that which cannot be experienced because it only exists in the mind.
The coward/hypocrite can use this to associate the rational with the absurd.
The synthesis inserts the theoretical alongside the empirical so that the mind believes these belong together, that they are automatically compatible.

Exist = all patterned and non-patterned energies that (inter)act - dynamic.
Thoughts exist, in the sense that they are neurological energies that can (inter)act with other energies, but the representation does not exist as it cannot (inter)act unless it is externalized via a medium.

Does a photo of a house exist?
Yes....does the house depicted in the photo exist?
No...at least not the same exact one.
The house has changed by the time the photo is taken, and it is dynamic whereas the photo is a static representation.

If I write on a piece of paper the word 'unicorn' dopes the paper and ink exist?
Yes.
Does the unicorn exist?
No.

Similar to the previous....
Does a moron or an insane person have a use?
I guess you can attempt to find a use for anyone, so yes, in theory.
Does anything the moron or the crazy person say have a use?
No.

We have to differentiate between the phenomenon, the tangible, pragmatic, activity, from the noetic abstraction that only exists as possibility, or intent...or in theory.
This is why stupidity, like inanity, is so dangerous.  
It is detached from reality, and is unpredictable.....unless you read their intentions through their body language, or the gibberish that comes out of their mouth.

It takes a bit of insanity and the ability to dumb yourself down to get into the fucked-up mind - empathy.

Know Thyself, is to know every aspect of your being so that you can then relate with what is beneath you.
The superior can empathize with the inferior without becoming lost in it, without confusion the other for itself.
The inferior cannot empathize with the superior. It will always be baffled by it, and use imitation to try to get a feel for what is alien. The inferior will sympathize as the only way to empathize with what is beyond its ability to understand.

He who can find nothing in his past health something to be proud of, seeks it in being sick.
Both an excuse and a way of receiving the attention he would not have received when healthy.

When there were still seemingly vast expanses unclaimed and unexplored frontiers man had a different philosophical conception of world and his place in it.
We've drifted so far left that the ancient Doric tribe would be considered brutal fascists, and Nazis, by today's standards, and yet, at that time even the birthplace of what would be called Democracy, Ionian Athens, admired and emulated them.

Unculled population explosions, maintaining a sophisticated system is how philosophy has been emasculated and infected by Abrahamism.
We are encased in a sea of humanity and our conception of philosophy is now political, infected by the necessity to placate masses of, otherwise, unfit individuals.
World means humanity and universe is now conceived as an all-inclusive consciousness.  
The Jews renamed their Tribe God, and then adopted a narrative where they, having been rejected by every other tribe, accept themselves as the king of all Kingdoms.
The messiah would appear only when the world, i.e. humanity, faced Armageddon, and this is why they rejected the Christian Messiah who was nothing more than a bastard synthesizing, genetically, what could not be memetically, and then justifying the incompatibility as divine mystery.

A strange thing to consider but the only salvation for man, as he has made himself, is to open the frontiers and escape what is now the prison planet of his birth.
Like the rats in Calhoun's experiment would have been saved by releasing them from the 'behavioural sink' the scientists had confined them within.

Enclosures breed parasites and spread virus', like the Abrahamic one presently  infecting the west.
To open the windows and let in fresh air, would be the same as opening up space to man's possibilities.
Then, this vile parasite will no longer matter.
We will leave it behind us, like a bad memory from our youth...like the measles.

Open frontiers will make governments, as we know them, obsolete, just as overpopulation and an absence of frontiers made the original city-states obsolete.
It will mean the end of masculine obsolescence, and it will return sex and race back to the importance it once had.
Like escaping the womb...or parental care.

The word 'world' will no longer mean humanity, as the very concept will have ceased to mean what it presently implies.

Timocracy will return, because freeloaders will not be sustainable off-planet, when resources will be precious and everybody's contributions will be crucial to survival.  
Then, lies will no longer be sustainable either.....their costs too much to humour.
When life is on the line, bullshit is a threat.

Words will regain their severity, and cease being toys in the minds and mouths of babes pretending to be superheroes and daring explorers and brave warriors.

The lowest-common-denominator can be converted to a noetic abstraction, an idea(l) to base an ideology/dogma that supersedes the tangible, the real.
Theory usurping pragmatism. We see this in Abrahamism and in Marxism, where a worker from one tribe can feel more kinship with a worker in another tribe. Their shared social status linking them with an ideology that dismisses blood ties.
Such individuals can turn on thir own people to benefit themselves. This is r/ selection at work.
A lower in status, within his in-group, will support and seek reciprocal support from a lower in status member of another group. Their shared interests in relation to their respective hierarchies unifies them, even if they have no tangible, genetic, shared interests.
This is more popular when systems produce un-invested, free-radicals, mostly males, who have no ties with their own tribe, but may share a psychological affinity with members of a different tribe in the same situation.
The bridging between blood ties, using ideology, may go so far as to strive for an elimination of all tribal differences, to produce genetic uniformity.

Traitors to their own past, thir own kin.

The lowest-common-denominator can claim the high status (nihilistic inversion) of  an idea that is placed above, beyond, or as an all-encompassing underlying noetic idea(l)....God.
The theoretical can be the fantastic, the non-existent presented as more 'real' than the experienced real.
An easy-sell when the individual has awakened to his genetic disadvantages.
An alliance based on lies, and shared deficiencies, fantasizing alternate realities where everything is overturned.
"Workers of the world unite!!!!"
or
"Sinners of the world, be saved!!!"

To synthesize the incompatible, the real has to be reduced to the idea(l), by ‘exiting the real’, in theory, noetically.
From the non-existent, outside, beyond, underlying, occult, the idea(l) can be shaped, or defined, to integrate what in reality is incompatible, and contrary.
How does one unify the contradicting multiplicity?
By noetically 'exiting' reality, into a mystical, theoretical plane.
How did the Judaic, inversion, the misanthropic, nihilistic anti-real, integrate with the pragmatic, life affirming, nature worshipping Hellenic?
By fabricating an idea(l) that was placed beyond space/time, and by mystifying language by detaching them from their references in the world.
Jesus, as the Divine (nihilistic), given 'flesh', represents the synthesis of incompatible spiritual outlooks.
His theoretical flesh and blood synthesizes in mystification what cannot be one and the same.
Only then could a 'believer' turn on his own family, his own blood, his own self as an expression of what he is willing to sacrifice to be saved.
Saved from what?
From himself... from his past, his nature.

A Messiah became necessary, as it will become for the Jews when their existence under threat.
Without the inversion symbol, where the contradictions could be united in a narrative, Judaism and Hellenism could not have merged into Christianity.
The method was simple. It is part of how the mind works.
How can the multiplicity of divergence me unifies into an absolute oneness that contradicts multiplicity?
By escaping the empirical, into the mind, where the non-existent, ‘outside existence’, could be noetically entered and exited; the world exited internally, into as a theoretical external that implies that the experienced outside is but a shadow, an illusory ersatz, relative to the esoteric external.
I call this the seesaw method, or ‘Trojan Horse’ blurring the lines between representation and represented so that the mind can simultaneously invert back and forth, from noumenon to phenomenon, from empirical to ideological, merging the two using a unifying abstraction given a symbol/name; antithesis unified, in theory, and contradictions assimilated into a mystifying uniformity, a conceptual whole.

We don't need to reinvent morality.
We can learn the basics, which we have forgotten, by watching a pack of wolves. They know what we refuse to know.
We need to cleanse ourselves from the inversions and conversions; the corruption and accumualted mutations of the last centuries.

We do not need to reinvent our values, or invent new principles, new ideals...but only remember, and return to what we've left behind in what we've called 'progress'.

This may seem like a radical act, after centuries of being infected by a disease, but becoming healthy means you have to break into a cold-sweat, signalling the body's coming out of hot fever.
Maintaining a lucid, wakeful state is, to a narcoleptic, a revolutionary act.
to the man that has become accustomed to his illness, learned to rely on it, used it to gain pity and attention he would not have received, becoming healthy is, indeed, an act of radical reawakening.

This [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] is not only a war against European manhood, under the code name 'paternalism', it is also a war against our traditions, our spirituality, our identity, our language and our reason....the very fabric of our being.
It is an attack upon our everything.

You can't control slaves by force....you control them by convincing them they are master so their own enslavement.
You feed into their deepest resentment and vanity, seeking vengeance upon all that has kept him down, has exploited his nature.
You tell him what he desperately wants to believe, inverting the inferior to superiority....making slavishness a virtue to be dominated by the greatest submission.
You make retribution a matter of survival.
You make kings of the highest slaves.
You detach minds from reality, using words.

They will learn, and know our own traditions, our own lost cultures better than we do.
Then they sell it back to us infected and warped by their disease, taking advantage of our ignorance.
They will pretend to be one of us, more European than us.
They will use our own intellectuals, and our ignorance of them, to reinterpret them and teach us their diseased versions.
They will use our illiteracy, our forgotten artistry, and exploit our own languages, enslaving us in their semiotics.
They will use our confusion, and our desire to find our way back, to lead us further astray.

Our duty is to find our way to the sources, and learn to use the world as our standard.
Our duty is to learn who and what we are.
Otherwise we are lost.

Parasites, viruses, and vermin feed on weakness.
They will try to make us more vulnerable to their hopeful fantasies, and they will use our own kind, turning them against us; finding the feeblest, most desperate, among us, the emasculated and ill, to infect us, by using our trust against us.

What stands before us and the world are generations of degradation, piled up above us, reacted to with vanity fuelled ego wanting to find its way to a surface, from the gallows it is trapped in.
The buried feel reborn, crawling out of a subterranean womb, which is really a tomb, and when they break the surface they feel reborn, like they climbed upon a pinnacle when all they've managed is to crawl up to the ground, from where their work will truly begin.

Altruistic excuse
All together or none at all.
Those afraid to move forward, of fear that they may walk alone, always find an excuse to stop and wait.
The moral argument of wanting to move in unison is a way of hiding insecurity beneath a self-flattering moral motive.

Parasitical Psychosis
A coward places the narcissist above him, because he is unable to walk alone, and he is too afraid to face the unknown.
He would rather follow a leader than stand forth on his own.
The narcissists and the paranoid are unified in schizophrenia.

Insecurity seeks in other a reason to believe in itself.
The coward seeks courage in another.
The one who has given up on his own traditions, who hates his own past, seeks in the alien a reason to feel proud of his presence in the present.

The fearful spirit closes itself off from the external world, even if, in its mind, this esoteric is called an exoteric.

Is it so strange to find a member of a tribe, discovering its low status within the tribe, allying himself with a member of a different tribe that feels equally threatened by the same representatives of higher status?
Weakness knows no boundaries. Strength imposes boundaries.
Weakness seeks an easy alternative, even if it means, the destruction of its own kind....in fact, because it means the destruction of its own kind does it more passionately find companions in the alien.
It's feebleness seeks power everywhere, even among the enemies of those who made him possible.

'The enemy of my enemy is my friend'....says he.
Vengeance against those he feels insecure towards will stop at nothing....not even its own destruction.
Self-destruction is how it absolves itself from the shame of its own feebleness.

It is anti-discriminating....breaking boundaries, contradicting reason, challenging common sense, all in the name of revenge against all those who made as what he is.

What would a continuously ordering organism find attractive?
Space is possibility. Both awe inspiring and terrifying. Order, in this expanse of possibility, would be probability, named matter/energy.
Probability is what man calls beautiful and what he feels as power. Probability is the unfolding of potential within the possible.
What would he call empowering, in the expanding possible, but the probable he can perceive, and by perceiving it he could react to and, perhaps, learn to control, direct?
Freedom in this expanding possible would be both empowering in its certainty, its order, and terrifying in its uncertainty, its chaos.
What inspires man is what is superior to him in order, in probabilities.
Beauty, being the ordered, symmetrical, fills man with desire, and proportionality, symmetry's pragmatic, adjustment to order/chaos, is the promise... the potential.

This fills man with joy.

Collectivist in-group reproductive strategies would sanctify the collective using the concept of 'god'.
Secularization would externalize this as a collectivism that encompassed all of existence, if not only all humanity.

God would expand, and the esoteric externalized as world.

Religion would hide the collective from other, and its secular version would hide other from the collective.
An extreme example would be Marxism that attempted to universalize the collective, or destroy it if it resisted.

Bi-Polar Nihilistic paradigm, expressed as right/left politics:

Spiritual Nihilism = separation of the in-group from otherness.
The in-group is sanctified and named God.
God is the symbol of the collective; the individual is but a representation.
The in-group becomes an alternate reality, excluding all otherness - singularity contradicting multiplicity.
In-Group covers itself in ritual, symbols, words, and lives in its own scripted reality - more 'real' reality.
A reality that cannot be experienced but lived; that can only be thought and stated.
Repetition solidifies its internal essence as external practice.
It is the 'real' hiding from the un-reality of world - theoretical (noetic ) singularity within experienced (apparent, phenomenal) multiplicity.
Multiplicity is presented as chaos, as nil, contrasting with the in-group's oneness, its absolute order.

Secular Nihilism = immersion of the in-group in universality.
The world becomes the in-group = all is god/one.
Some know it, or accept this 'truth' and others are ignorant, or reject it....the only distinction.
All is one. Universal collectivism.
Those that are ignorant must be enlightened (corrected), and those that reject must be eliminated (erased) - political, spiritual, cultural Marxism.
World, as multiplicity, is covered, in noetic oneness.
The in-group does not hide from world but the world is hidden from the in-group.

To 'hide' the world one must convert it to an illusion, or use illusion to hide from it.

Inversion of world becomes externalized, rather than internalized.
Instead of seeking the divine singularity in self (mind, renamed soul), presenting world as illusory or as evil, the singularity is sought in exiting the world, the real, into the unreal, where multiplicity is converted into a singularity....the real, as multiplicity, is inverted into an absolute singularity, a oneness (universe), from the vantage point of the non-existent, the unreal.

Idea as the divine, is no longer placed in the esoteric, the occult, contradicting the real, the experienced....but it is placed in the hyper-exoteric, the beyond the outside - outside the outside.

Top<>Down emoting/thinking
Top as a singular idea(l) existing in the mind, and shared with the initiated, separating them from others (chosenness), or Top placed in the non-existent outside existence, making the real the experienced into a singular idea(l).
In both cases the idea(l) contradicts the real, if taken literally and not as a method, a tactic, formulating representations, to make the counter-intuitive fluid, intuited abstract.

Art, including language (math/geometry) becomes more than a way of relating to the real, but becomes an alternative to it.
Semiotics become world-creating tools. The word can now become the 'first'.
Paradoxes, conundrums which this method creates become a matter of spiritual debate on the mystery, and mystical essence, of the created divine.
The mind explores its own mystification, or the paradoxes it has created by confusing language with reality - the representation with the represented, the subjective with the objective.
The underlying motive is to discredit reason, or replace world as as the starting point for Bottom<>Up reasoning.
Vagueness is how the absolute is maintained, and vagueness is how it is justified.
Its mysteriousness, its irrationality, not cause for concern, indicating error, but a source of hope, indication of its deeper 'truth' - more profound truth.
The more irrational the idea(l) the more the believer feels relief from the rational world.
Its irrationality is the sacrifice made by the 'true believer' to the divine - evidence of his/her faith.
In fact it is a self-sacrifice made to self-preserve.

Chaos used to cope with determining, determined, order.
Chaos as an occult source of counter-order, contradicting the threatening experienced.
From this source the individual can draw anything it needs to compensate for what it lacks.

Nihilism lacks integrity.
It will never accept reality.
It would rather make a fool of itself, promoting the idea(l) that all is an idea, and that there is no such thing as objective reality.
The idea(l) of making everything a matter of ideology, a subjective social construct, is the unifying meme.

It fills them with hope, and it gives them someone to blame, other then themselves.
The idea(l) is so powerful it has become a mental virus, which is to say that it has become a psychosis.
It gnaws at them, from the back of the mind - it eats away at them, like a parasite.

It retards their development, or it reverts them to their naive infantile state, where they prefer to remain.
It's the 'sacrifice' they make to survive, to live with themselves, to endure what they are.

In the cracks perfection is spoiled and completion fails; through the cracks life falls, one piece at a time, and rises again; through the cracks existence ebbs and flows; in the cracks we hide and are forgotten, and through them we are discovered and recalled.

How can anyone even begin to judge rationally, and to think clearly, with a mind full of words and symbols that refer to nothing....and to enjoy this nothingness as untapped potential, or an all-encompassing void?
For one, because his own judgments can now be equalized, erasing his determined and determining past, and for another because he can use this detachment through nothingness, this disconnection of mind from world, along linguistic fissures,  to fabricate his own private reality; fabricate it so enticing, and extraordinary as to make it bait for desperate feebleness.

For both nothingness is where they thrive; their words mean nothing intentionally.
They want all words to refer to nothing, for nothing is their foundation.
These are Nihilists.
Projecting empty words into a world they found lacking, attracting the kind that found it overwhelming and unflattering.    
A marriage made in 'heaven'...in the meaningless nothing.

As our understanding of our inner-workings increases this will be reflected in our external-workings.
As we begin to decipher the inner code, directing the interactions of the processes we call 'self' this will be translated into languages, externalizing these inner codes and applying them using a medium.

Just as we translate the world through a medium like light or air, so do we re-translate these abstractions into a linguistic code and then may use a different medium to externalize the translation.
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]...

...the entire process following paths-of-least-resistance and governed by attraction/repulsion, determining harmony/disharmony.
No dichotomy....harmony is the same as disharmony only it describes an approach to the same the relationship from the vantage point of attraction. If the approach is from repulsion then the proper term would be disharmony.
This 'relationship' is another way of saying (inter)action.

It's all mechanical because we are dealing with order, which is the foundation of live.
The 'mystery' enters the picture in the form of chaos (randomness).
Chaos is this factor which is mystified. Fodder for superstition and fantasies.
Chaos disrupts order, forcing a reaction that is more adaptive - immediate.
That is why consciousness evolves.
Chaos necessitates a less mechanical, less predictable, reaction to reality.

I've given my definition of meaning but I'll dumb it down.

We all perceive the world and we discover a meaning in it.
Meaning refers to what is indicated by what we perceive.
Not all meanings are accurate.
Someone may think that the colour of a banana means it is ripe....another may think it means it is magic...a third may think ti means that it is poisonous.
Each mind interprets the shape, colour, texture, smell etc...of the object.
Not all are correct.

If this is not clear then how can we proceed to define what is the idea(l), or how we "ought to live our lives"?


The meaning we give to the perceived is subjective....but this does not mean it is all the same, or equally valid.
Our subjectivity is measured against an objective world which is independent from our desired, hopes, and interpretations, judgments.
We then live our life according to these judgments...and we face the consequences.

In the west these consequences are mitigated by a system that protects imbeciles from their own stupidity....they become addicted to this intervention because it allows them to think and do whatever they like without facing the consequences. They call it their 'right'.
It is a way for them to delude themselves that their judgments are just as good as any others.

Some of these imbeciles need to believe that all is a product of a intervening system....and that there is no such thing as an indifferent objective world beyond these systems.
They want to believe this because it is comforting to think that they are not the only cowards and idiots that depend no a system to make judgments and to not suffer the consequences.

These imbeciles are usually ones that went from God, the absolute universal system, to Marxism, the more human system.
From one external, all-watching, protective Will, to another....From God to the State.
The idea of an indifferent unconscious objective world, from which humans emerge and set up systems, is so terrifying that they negate it, in their mind.....
The world must either be created by God, or created by humanity....or the ideal it is created by the individual.
They need a will, a consciousness to be responsible for reality.
Reality is a creation of a mind...not mind of world.

Inverted....emoting. = Nihilism.

Meaning indicates how phenomena inter-relate and to what degree.
This is a preliminary step before the individual begins to chart a course among these inter-relations.
but even if the above two factors are accurate, or as accurate s possible, then there's also the factor of the individual's particular strengths and weaknesses which will also determine a successful or failed course of action.

Seeing the world as it is does not automatically result success.  
There's also the necessity of seeing self as it is, in relation to world.
This will only increase your potential for success, not guarantee it.

So, we must begin from the ground up and first determine how the world is, then we must determine, as objectively as possible, how we are, relative to the world, before we begin to determine a course of action.
The application of a judgment is the relationship of judgment of world, judgment of self, in relation to world, and then application.

What philosophy does is determine how to judge...world, self, and then it offers a way of determining how to apply this judgment towards a desired objective/ideal/goal.

Judgment of world is an assessment of what is real, and how it inter-relates; whether or not our goal is attainable or even real.
Then we judge self in relation to world and the ideal.....not overestimating nor underestimating.
Then we judge a course towards the ideal...the objective.

First step is to reconnect words to actions, from where we intentionally have disconnected them from, because we do not want to release them from our power, and we do not want them to be unconscious, indifferent to our desires and hopes and needs.
So we reconnect the words we've 'sanctified' made 'divine' by detaching them from the experienced activity they originally referred to.
That's just the first step, the easiest one...in this fucked-up world of Nihilism, producing Zombies.
The harder step of judging self, in relation to world, without under-estimating nor allowing ourselves the more comforting need to overestimate.

These are the first two steps before we can even begin to chart a course towards an objective; before we apply our judgments in the real world.