Forums

Typicial Jewish and British claim, illogic and use of ''argument'' when then cannot refute and use actual arguments. The British media and the Jewish media are full of it, especially when it is about Hitler ''he had a micro-penis with one lonely testicle, that is why he had to compensate for his self-worth by killing everybody with bigger schlomo's'' - what a Jew..

Some accuse me of being a guru telling people what to do, others accuse me of not doing so, not "bringing it down to earth" and mentoring and telling people what to do....in the end stupidity is what it is.

I describer world and refrain from telling people how to deal with it, or that it ought to be dealt with.

I un-cover patterns I have found in world, and share them with those who are interested. I care not what they do with this information (knowledge) and/or understanding.
KT is a repository of information and understanding, so as to preserve it from a world burying it, forgetting it, denying it.
We, here, want to save wisdom from the dirt, and culture from the filth, and intelligence from stupidity.
Members, with degrees of access, can sample this knowledge and understanding, test it and apply it on their own.

I do not coerce I convince...and some of the patterns I've uncovered for minds that lacked the ability, or the stress to do so on their own, are certainly convincing and accessible, to all, in the world around them.

Most detractors assault me, as Satyr, as the messenger, and repeatedly fail to do any damage to the data and understanding provided....because they are clueless, driven by emotion, hedonism, a need to preserve self and their adopted idea(l)s as self-evident.
I used to deal with them one-on-one but I am too old and bored with dullards....having come in contact with a variety of the same dis-ease over the years.
What they think and say I no longer care about...and my only interest in them is because they are part of the Modern environment...like studying bugs not because they are superior or interesting on their own, but because there are so many of them and they participate in the ecosystem I exist within.
To survive in an environment you study every creature that populates it...and so to survive modern urban lies and pretenses, one studies the freaks and geeks populating it.

KT can be thought of as a nature manual un-covering biological organism and the environmental conditions that brings them about and sustains them.
When a biologists studies and then describes a worm it isn't because he genes off on it, or finds the worm to be a threat, or more interpreting than a baboon, he studies it because ti is a part, a tiny but important, part of the entire ecosystem...and here ecosystem is buried under urban systems, manmade environments...genes under memes.

Hrodeberto wrote:

It's funny how like in whatever sort of defensive competition it's always a degradation down to the plain primal, after all, there's neither progressives nor regressives in the prospects of debasement.

Yes, only thing is Fixed just happens to be a fan of Reich -

reviewer wrote:

"WR concluded that the orgasm in both the male and female of the species has a role that is far more meaningful and important to our well being than a mere pleasure principle working us towards reproduction. In short, he argues that the orgasm helps balance us and restore our sanity when the knocks and disappointments of everyday life threaten to unbalance us. It is a bit like a bar magnet. When it is in its most pure state, the atoms of the magnet are perfectly polarised (our lives are in balance) when it is subject to hammer blows, the magnet loses its perfect polarity and its power (the nitty-gritty wears us down and saps our life energy). Remagnetizing the bar magnet (orgasm's job in us) restores that polarity and our natural sense of well-being."

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Now just read the table of contents to his [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], you see where this is going and where he is coming from.

Someone who believes in the all-healing orgasmic 'orgone' energy has nothing whatsoever to do with homosexual or heterosexual; pure energy - just like his mentor Reich believed, and he, his mentor Christ.

His obsession with sex and penis size is to do with [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], and unleashing of all that healing force (Self-valuing/christening = a state of consistent orgasm/health = orgone energy), He thinks is the answer, and finds the rest feeble and 'impotent' because they give a f--- about hetero and homo…

He is pure magnetic. He sizzles with healing orgone energy… the founder of value-Xt....

Rumour has it that KT is populated with my sock-puppets.
A nasty rumour the average dolt wants to be true and so swallows it like a delicious worm.
Serves me right, I started it, just to see if morons would bite what they desperately want to believe is true.
The most enduring rumour is that Lyssa and I are the same individual.
A flattering possibility she would be insulted by, but I like its implications.  

This is quintessentially Nihilistic psychosis....similar to Christian faith: the desire (erotic) to believe something is so, overcomes any reasoning, any doubts.
Love is blind, and lust is paroxysm, overwhelming reason.

The need stifles the mind, by cutting oxygen to it; quiets logic, and allows emotions to take over and make a final judgment.
So prone to this type of manipulation, these moderns are, that all you have to do is tell them what they most desperately want to believe is true, and do so with a straight face.
Seed their minds with a possibility that can help them evade a threat and they will take it.
Isn't this what the priests in the Abrahamic and secular traditions have done for centuries?
A lie is believable even among the most stringent minds, when it offers a possibility that help the individual cope with an anxiety/fear greater than his need to see clearly.
How else, do you think, could a Christian god persuade so many with such infantile story-lines, and blatant counterfeiting of ancient Pagan mythologies and traditions, converted to life-hating medicines?

It's the sort of enduring and endearing belief as my obsession with the movie character Hannibal.
Interest in an artist's work, which Hannibal was, seems to be an obsession only when said character produced anxiety, and those who fear it do not get it, or do get it and fear it all the more.

As an artist's device the character was a brilliant vehicle to express the Modern condition....buuuuut you can all imagine me walking around pretending I am a fictional creature.
Quite flattering, actually, that I could ever pull it off and be extraordinary like that.
I'm more "obsessed" with superheroes and Modern obsession with their mythologies, the whole comic book genre transferred to movie lore, a modern substitute for ancient mythologies....I guess you can call my interest in modern obsessions, and narcosis an obsession.
Why not?
If it makes you feel better about yourself, go for it.

To be honest my interest is minimal, these days. ILP has lost its pizzazz, some of the most interesting specimens remaining quiet, or no longer visit.
What's left is....terrible.
So dull I rarely go there, and i don't bother reading all the posts.
Whatever is said, by the poor things, is fine by me. They have, yet, to offer a challenge to my positions that would attract my "obsessive" interest.
If they wish to deal with them by making up shit, believing in whatever they want to believe, painting as picture of Satyr with erasable paint, so....fuckin'....what?
My motives are to clarify....and as long as my clarifications, uncovering theories, remains untouched, undamaged, unblemished, they can swing away, throw feces like chimpanzees, at the individual behind Satyr.
Using shaming tactics may lead to a reciprocal reaction from one who may do it better...
To be accused of using shaming tactics by those who ONLY have shame to use to quiet what troubles and confronts their delicate feelings is, to say the least, delicious; to be accused of attacking them personally by those who ONLY have personal insinuations to challenge my views, is, to say the least....precious; to expect to be taken seriously and to be treated with respect when all you do is use emotion and insinuations, including shame and hate, is, to say the least...pathetic.

You know, there was a time, when I was younger, that I could easily rip that place and all its members to shreds....but I am older and lack the stamina and the interest to go through all that effort.
I did it for years....can't repeat the same shit.
Let the bugs have their place....let them take tiny little bites from my goat hide, poor gnats.  
Who cares?
They were once a microcosm of the macrocosm, now they've fallen beneath even that mediocrity.
More members and not more participants, and of those who do regularly post what of value is there in those posts?
Anything interesting?
If some of my friends want to use ILP for sport, it is none of my business...but I do enjoy the show.
You have to start by hunting spider monkeys, then move up to chimpanzees if you are, at all, interested in big game hunting.
Granted the quality of human on ILP is pretty low, even by modern standards, but you have to make do.
Young men need to train, test their chops....an old man has lost interest, but can still appreciate from a distance.
If they can say nothing about the ideas I propose as being superior, then what they do with their time is their affair, and how they comfort and deal with them is their business.

To Moreno, displaying logical common-sense and employing standard procedures of debate [such as holding someone up to cite a source and a basis for their baseless accusations like: "a focus on some of the interpersonal dynamics S engages in. You know PMing people to get them to carry out little tasks to undermine people."] is being "rigid" and "readymade" defense similar to cAnus.

Any disciplined approach is rigid, and "anal" to Moreno. He complains of the crudity of generalizations that Satyr does, but when someone proceeds personally, contextually, subject-at-hand on ILP,,, he accuses them of being Satyr-doubles or cAnus-doubles or being defensive! or exact copies of the former...

It demands context-specificity and personal care when it comes to itself,,, but when someone takes a neutral view to the Satyr issue, immediately, all are swept off in one big generalization that they are Satyr doubles or his shadows or boys he abused…

Its not Moreno at all who uses shame tactics to silence, humiliate, and censor anyone questioning his judgement, or asking to verify his baseless accusations.

Who is the one who is attempting to shame and silence others by calling them exact doubles or depriving them of their individuality?

Who is the one displaying violence trying to Erase, discredit another individual voice and Slotting another into CATEGORIES of false patterns They have abstracted Satyr to?

Not Moreno of course. He is not trying to shame, induce guilt or caregorize at all, for using standards of approach that Moreno finds displeasurable…

Such Rigid hypocrisy.

Moreno wrote:

No, it can be fine to stick to your guns. I was thinking more of when challenged feeling the need to not only stick to one's guns, but to try to use social, playing to the gallery to make the one who disagrees be seen as an idiot.

He insinuates [bolded] Satyr is a narcissist and simultaneously critiques him for making the other "be seen as an idiot" - - - so the one to whom image matters most and is concerned abt. it is not Moreno? Nope.

When one is used to debating discussions on consensus, then one automatically assumes, the other debates from the same impulse - not for sincerity, clarity, but for the audience.

Its evil to judge and pronounce judgement on another. One who does so, does so to feel superior, and not to discriminate, not to refine superior and inferior standards, etc.
Everyone's views has its own relative validity, and no one is really an idiot.
Everything is its own special case; comparisons are cruel beyond relative, mutually feeding references.

Quote :

To engage in dominance games, with a focus on use of shame, instead of argument and or in addition to argument. That kind of posturing.

Satyr has himself admitted to use shame and provocation to filter the serious from the non-serious. What posturing?

Quote :

In reality it is certainty as a mask.

He's explained on the contrary. The internet is the only available medium to be mask-less as one can afford, to do away with social and political civility/repression and debate free-spiritedly with all of one's personality and means, and this threatens their comfort zone - their "rigidity" - safe and cosy in mutual politeness. "Muh feelingz" tops all methodology and motive.

Quote :

This does not mean, in his case, that he thinks he is 100 per cent certain. But in social terms he acts as if no other idea can exist or should

No absolutes.

And "should?" If one cares for borders, and sharper definitions of entities - be that self, race, nation, concepts, ideology… then some things are kept out and some things are kept in.
The "should"-not-exist is in relation to what one aims to create, to achieve.

Quote :

He implies certainty by being willing to diminish others, by needing to, when they disagree with him.

No, when they disagree with reality. Then the question arises, who defines what reality is, etc.
Then we get into organ hierarchies and objectivities beyond pain/pleasure and hedonistic nihilisms. Trimming, escaping, shutting, disguising, sweeping, inverting all those parts of past and reality to suit what gives one that "certainty" of pleasure, which the likes of Moreno crave.

Quote :

This is rigidity and functional, relational fear denial. And it creates a culture.

Culture, patriarchy, anything that needs discipline is automatically repression - leading to rigidity, immobility, fear, anger and ultimately hatred.

zz

Quote :

In this case a little one, one which has a need to be parasitic on other communities and individuals, SO THAT IT CAN FEEL SUPERIOR. It will keep coming back compulsively to what it hates because of the need to reassure itself.

Parasitism is the destruction of a superior host - ILP is superior? By what standards? Which contributors? What criteria?

Free speech? Oh they mean selective free-speech… their double-stds.…

Quote :

There are times to be flexible and times to be rigid. There are times to stick to your guns, they are times to reconsider. Context dependent and related to what you know you know and how you know it etc.

But I was referring to a specific sick pattern.

Sick pattern observed by whom? How is Moreno more healthy and balanced than any on KT?
Moreno knows when to stick to his guns [when he needs to defend himself and cling to his sacred holycow truths that would otherwise shatter his comfortable rigidity] and when to be flexible [he can accept the relative merit of something when he is not made to look/"feel" like an idiot]…

maggot anders wrote:

That's what Costa is currently doing with ILP. He obviously suffers from multiple narcissistic injury disorder.

Lyssa, on the other hand, strikes me as a daughter of a narcissist who has developed attraction toward narcissists as a way to cope. She's a cyberbully by proxy, which means, she cyberbullies other people not because she's a cyberbully herself, but because she wants to please other cyberbullies (e.g. Costa.)

We may recall how quick she was to toy with Erik. Not because she wanted to do so, but because Costa wanted her to do so.

I think it is our duty as conscientious citizens of ILP to do our best to destroy the codependent bond that has formed between Costa and Lyssa (here in this thread Lyssa is probably that user with that completely stupid name, Is_Yde_whatever.) This is "for their own good".

The first step would be to ban Lyssa. If she continues to shitpost, you can be sure as hell that I would report her.

Nobody here wants to report people. Well then, I will take the charge of reporting people. I know, I know. "When you [..] choose to report their harassing behavior, they come after you." But I will take the risk.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

No one is more narcissistic than someone with such a weak impressionable mind,, all it took was a few cyber-bullies on ILP taunting maggot anders that Satyr owned him. And that's all it took for him to snap into his new found narcissistic freedom. Anyone who ignores the narcissist bully maggot anders is a narcissist. Now that's circular reinforcement. Maggot behaves just like an ignored woman who starts raving with hatred because she is ignored and is not paid the proper attention she thinks everyone owes her. Abuse goes in circles. If one has a weak mind and got bullied into reacting a certain way at ILP; the bullied will now want to bully others to escape facing his own weakness.

This Type also fits Turden/Joker. Satyr ignoring Joker or not paying attention to him automatically makes Satyr the Aristocrat who Looks Down Oppressively on the common man. And then shame tactics automatically go to "showing" what Satyr does for a living, what a "lowly" job he does, etc.

Maggot and Joker are both the same type of those kind of narcissists who demand to be automatically respected, have their every word treated with acknowledgement and due protocol, else, its the other who is a bully, a narcissist, or arrogant elitist.

Dumb f----s.

The uselessness of addressing this post and feeding the maggot with attention is not lost on me; except as always, when someone else is involved, I am forced to do so.

Noooooooooooooooo. Is_Yde_OpN is not I; and reporting someone just because they dont agree with the cyber bully maggot, "if you don't acknowledge what i say or submit to my judgement, I will bully you into reporting you and have you banned" is enough narcissism and cyber-threat on display. And Is_Yde_OpN already displayed the stupidity and hypocrisy of maggot's own circular logic.

This idiot maggot not long ago went on a spree on ILP of asking every woman, including me, if he could rape her. Powerlessness manifests in the ugliest ways.

meowpussy wrote:

This is also why you do not grasp the importance of Nietzsche, why the philosophical work of this age is foreign to you.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Whatever is his style to philosophy, he atleast doesn't twist N. like some invalid who needs words to be inserted into his mouth.

Maybe you should keep your head, and i mean the slower one, within Mdm. Blah-tsky and see more rays coming out from her twat… this age needs such important philosophical work…

And if cowards and hypocrites are forced into exposing themselves in expression of their trivial "power", is this not to be consider a "good' thing?
If, for no other purpose than to expose stupidity to its own delusions, and the fake to his own duplicity, to those who can appreciate, then the "cost", shallow and minimal as it may be, is worth it.

Every time the same process is repeated, with the same excises and justifications, the divinity of modern authority is revealed through its feeble minions and its weakest representations.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Look at (Turd/Sander's) Xt. intimidation and threatening like a good coward, once run out of arguments…

Nietzsche does that to people like him.

This is the real Broadcasting on channel KT of the fear N. brings out in real Xt. cowards like Sander.


Amorphos - the most ridiculous argument summing up the meaning of "Stupid".

So every genius who has dared to take the path of max. resistance and fought the current upstream, going mad or whatever in the process is "punished", and therefore taught a good lesson for his sin.

Now, if the retard Amorphos actually read BOT directly, he would find N. himself saying, every transgression into the nature of reality will have a consequence - Oedipus solves the riddle and goes blind, Hercules completes the labour and goes mad, etc. etc.

Like this should be any argument against heroism, or as if those like N. should have never attempted philosophy itself…
How stupid of anyone to try!

Lets all do philosophy ILP style, safe, comfortable, feeble… and feel victorious in their self-preservation like content cud-chewing animals.

Lets never ask great questions, and keep safe in doing yoga, sex, healthy food, the optimum life and enjoy away…, and now and then we can take risks putting dope up your nose, peculiar objects up the ass, some wild remarks at exs, and feel heroic…

Those like Amorphos and Sandy are rightfully Already selected out from the rare Right to A nietzsche...

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]  garbage, if not most garbage, cannot be salvaged.
This is part of metaphysics and how with flux, attrition reducing patterns to lower levels, or disrupts them to such a degree that they lose all pattern, becoming random, chaotic.

Most (inter)actions result in this "loss", which is why entropy is increasing, and why we experience this increase as linear time.  

Only a God would be able to return this chaos back to its previous pattern, and only a God would be able to break through the chaos in this piece of shit's mind, to talk sense to it.
With filth, one must determine, judge, discriminate, between what is a lost-cause, and what remains useful, if only as fertilizer.

To treat filth as if it is not what it is, would entail lowering yourself to the filth's level of thinking and discourse... like entering a pig-sty.
Sure, it might be fun, for a while, or even useful in exposing what swine are, to those watching, but if the goal is to convert the pig to a human, then the roles are reversed, and you become the swine, and it laughs at you because it has "reduced you down to its level".
Nothing can please a pig more than lowering a human down to its level.
Yet, you can climb out of the shit-pool, while it is stuck there.... hoping only to pull others into the feces it values above all else.
You might keep your mouth closed, preventing the crap from entering your core, when it swallows it with gusto, but, from its point of view there is no difference: opening your mouth to speak is tantamount to gulping it all down into your stomach.

Moderns struggle with a simple concept like  [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.], not so much because it is complex, although this is also a cause when dumbing-down has become the norm, but, more so, because they wish to preserve their delusions intact in the definition, saving their ego from the implications...they place self-sustenance, survival, above clarity, above integrity.
The "debate" consists of fabricating a definition that will satisfy all.
Inter-Subjectivity maintained as the one and only reason.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] is another example of convolution emotional discourse, for rational discourse.
In the topic of "what rape is", the notion of "if rape should be permitted" enters the debate, tilting the subject towards emotional appeal to reason.
This is an example of social eugenics, or social fabrications, then accusing others of using social fabrications, such as race, and sex.
The social fabrication, necessity, of denying rape as an option, becomes a philosophical topic, about what rape is in nature, and why it exists as a option at all.

When discussing "nature" we anthropomorphize, symbolizing her as a female, and then criticizing her of being a "whore", exposing our own disposition and secret weakness.
Nature, represented by female as her agency, is now  "whore", because she "loves" all those the accuser is envious of, and permits entrance to others, and not to those who find this permission despicable, when it excludes him, contradicting the possibility of her being a whore.
If Nature were a "whore" then all love would be cheap, and all would have easy access to the gates of heaven...but the pain expressed here is indirect.
Nature accused of being "a whore" might be about one's mother, or some other hidden pain, expressed in this open, and indirect manner.

Nature = sum of all past, all previous nurturing.
Nature manifesting as presence, as appearance.

Now we can explore the negative connotations of the one using this term to describe nature, of which he, or she, has a minimal understanding of, except as how it manifests directly to them, for them.

Nature = sum of all nurturing; past.

Nature does not only tell us what we are, where we come from, it does not only inform us as to what was and will be, but it offers us precedent, to determine what is and what is not possible.
Knowing past, and then understanding past, informs us of why things are, as they are, and where they are going.
The deeper into past you see, the more subtle patterns you perceive.
More knowledge/data, beyond human symbols and ideals, increases the possibility of understanding more.
Patterns....(inter)acting, throughout time/space.
Patterns repeating, composing and decomposing, constructing and destructing... novelty but a combination of the same patterns, inter-relating.

But, how can one explain such things to Moderns, detached, disillusioned, ignorant, blind to past, rejecting nature, misunderstanding the knowledge, misinterpreting the meanings?
Who can explain, for example, to a Marxists why his conception of human nature is naive, and this is why communism, has never, can never be applied?
How do you explain to him his ideology is meant for termites, not humans?

Precedent.
Know Thyself speaks of it all.
To know self is to know past,nature, and through this self-knowledge to know otherness.
World and you within it, is all you need to make sense of it, and then to come to terms with it.
World where no mitigating power protects you from it, saves you from the consequences of your own judgments, but world through the study of nature/past, and the study of it as presence, outside human artifices....world as animals expose it to be, beyond parks and zoos, and cages.

To speak of nature/past, is not to approve of it, it is to acknowledge it as what it is.
To speak of race, sex, of rape, and violence, is not to promote it....but to know of it, the why of it....to know that to stop it, to reject, is to intervene, and THAT is social construct.
Not all human interventions are created equal, just as not all well-intended motives lead to positive outcomes.
Knowing, and then understanding nature/past establishes a standard for evaluating what is possible, and what is probable, from what is fantasy and delusion.
Knowing and understanding nature/past gives you a pool of precedent to determine outcome, and cost/benefit potentials.

Imbeciles like "Wyld" and company on ILP still trying to Artificially separate "rational-moderate" muslims from irrational fanatic muslims, as IF, Islam were, or could be anything other than the aggressive continuation of nihilism inaugurated by J-Xt. "zealots" and their "zeal" as Sloterdijk termed it, for banishing reality-as-it-is.

As if the "moderates" reading their Quran everyday living a "peaceful" life, in the "righteous way" carrying on the zeal of what is True, is disconnected from zealotry of the fanatics…

Arguing for artificial diversities, such as the necessity of muslims to keep the other two zealots in place is as absurd as saying cancer is useful for weight-loss…

People who voted out the discriminators, all for the sake of some fags' right to pleasure themselves whichever way, in the name of "liberty" and "love" and "human rights" and such culture of pleasure, cannot but inevitably face a culture of mindless pain, "meaningless" suffering… how could it be any other way in a culture of pure hedonism?

If "anything goes" for pleasure, so will "anything goes" for pain.

'Rational' is seeking pleasure, in his thinking. He wants to turn Muslims into pleasure seekers, pleasure valuers, atomised pleasure seekers, like him. He thinks he is being rational because he thinks his values are rational. Rational = my good/what I deem good.

About his 'you can't fight hate with hate'.
There are two ways how the zealot seeks to destroy - one is by trying to totally eradicate a thing, the other is to totally embrace it and disappear it and oneself in that unity.

Wyld is a romantic J.-Xt., self-infatuated with the "idea" of himself being rational and a "well-balanced" individual.
He's in love with this image of himself to himself.

And we all know what "well-balanced" means: Clinging to the safe fence line of PC that produces artificial hybrids and ruptures.
Entertaining Nature's under-ranked by ascribing equal "equality" to them, as if they were the same species, as if all that was needed was education - enough to appear and pass off as rational individuals in public, while reading The Book in private.

"Well-balanced" means playing into lies of 'all can be reasonable, if it only weren't for x, y, z…';
It means lets not be prejudiced in the face of facts knocking at your face.

Compared to such "maturity" of putting mud into a machine and expecting ice-creams to come out,, the rest are "fanatics", "immature" to Wyld.

As if, it doesn't matter What the holy book said, we can artificially bifurcate moderate muslims as those who want to practise said "holy wisdom" without enforcers - the muslim fanatics.
The content itself doesn't matter, as if the plague only boiled down to plain force.
As if, the private delusions of people do not affect globally in the long run.

As if, it doesn't first start as the right to dual laws [wearing burqa, right to banning eating during ramadan, etc.] - little "moderate" values that permeate, then growing into "quotas" and right to representation in universities, work-places, seats of power, UN, etc.,, pretending to be "reasonable" and "educated", which perpetuates the opinion that Islam is a rational religion, that aid the fanatics to exploit, not that they ever needed any reason in the first place.

As if, examples like "moderate" Malaysia and such could be any argument…;
as if, given power and resources on its side, it too, wouldn't prove to be a fanatic hotbed at the "world table of reasonable men".

Moderates are not necessarily the poor victims of fanatics, but the base Air-conditioning, oxygenating the fanatics…

Sloterdijk calls Islam, the zeal for perfection - the zeal to be a more perfect rationalism of J.-Xt., the zealous belief that it already Is a more rational improvement of it:

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Whether one ascribes the term rational to the moderate nihilists practising delusions reasonably, rationally, perfecting it even more,,, or to the extreme nihilists practising delusions in the belief they have the highest reason, it does not matter, since this hybrid confusion has its source in that first inversion of Reality made abstract as Word,, and therefore what passes off as enlightenment rationalism/objectivity is a Nihilism, and subjective solipsism rationalized into and as Objectivity.

Fanatics being replaced by rational moderate democrazies like in Iraq is what encouraged and spawned ISIS.
They suddenly realized, we dont need outsiders to break the system, we can do it ourselves, and while we are at it, lets take out all that is in power anywhere.
The fanatic barbarians removed, the moderate barbarians capitalized on the opportunity.
- The belief in entitlement, the "right-to…".
ISIS were "moderate" professors in universities and "educated" journalists, etc.

Stability in the mid-east bought at any cost, no matter what kind of (demo-)crazy one uses like gum to cement volatilities, will have collateral; this is to be expected.
As if nature could be channeled away, im-pressed down by force or seduction of dreams of a better life, would ever hold for long...

Immigration-controls only buy time;
problem has to be attacked at its root,, dis-ease has to be exposed,, as it is now exposing its self…, and at this price.

Sander/Turd wrote:

There is no evidence of racial superior enlightenment in your ilk, be it you or Sauwelios. It is just delusional word games peddled around on Storm Front forums. You haven't the slightest clue how bad your gibberglobbery goop excuse for ideas contradict and defeat your own supporting evidenced when matched up against history.

You, like any Nietzschean, lack a spiritual nature, because there is no fucking such thing. It isn't a separate category, isn't a anatomical isolate, there is no faith or religious region of the brain, and Ethics are based largely off our neuralchemical reactions to concrete phenomena.... all homo sapiens react to phenomena, such are fight or flight, similarly. There isn't a race on the planet that hasn't created a urban civilization. They have popped up in Africa to South America, Oceania, China and the middle east, and on the plains. We gained a lot of out pattern of urbanization from Egypt and Mesopotamia.

You talk like a damn fool, and the ideas aren't even originally yours. I've seen them plenty before. Your so sad and pathetic you had to get your retarded ideas from others.... you couldn't even develop your own idiotic presumptions.

As a white guy a hundred times smarter than you, I ask you, as a favor to the white race, lock your nads up in a chastity cage and go become a cave hermit.... we don't need your stupid genes floating around in the gene pool. Your genetic pollution, dumbing everyone down considerably. I will take a gang banger shooting wildly over your flop ass useless mind anyday.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

1. By lacking a 'spiritual nature', he means a J.-Xt. nature.

2. By White, he means Only skin colour and then call the other who has a more 'spiritual' definition of White, a racist.

Now, that's him being a hypocrite, not the other. Always has been.

Im going to try to catch me some..

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]