Communism/Marxism

New Game 'Call Of Duty: Rittenhouse' Lets You Defend Your Home From A Horde Of Bloodthirsty Communists [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Communist constitution.
If ten times you fail, and after millions die, try, and try, and try, and try, and try...again...and again...

Gumption of gullibility.

Genes to Memes

Socialism is group dynamics institutionalized and pushed beyond natural limits, e.g., Dunbar's number.
Communism is socialism pushed further beyond natural limits, into its radical extremism, where individual alienation from himself begins.

The early Communists still suffering from Abrahamism's naïve detachments from reality, still denying human nature,  believed goodness would prevail, and if given an opportunity that the masses would rise up, cast off their yolk, and establish a world of virtue, humanism, peace, justice, and joy for all.

Gradually their intelligentsia woke up to their naiveté - they called this real polityk - and some concluded that the masses needed a little prodding, so they put their efforts into increasing their suffering, making life more difficult - by undermining any attempts by the State to make it better - so as to trigger the rage, the hate, the rebellious spirit, to finally overthrow the evil capitalists who were exploiting them.
They resisted all attempts to raise the standard of living of the masses they began to despise.
That didn't work either. In some places they are still at it, these old-school Communists.

Finally - taking us to our present age - a few of them became cynical, they lost respect for humanity, they hated the proletariat because they did not rise up, they did not fight back; they realized the masses were sheeple, suffering from herd psychology. They realized there was human nature and if the capitalists were exploiting it so would they.
This was the beginning of populism - crossing over right/left political borders - we find it both in fascism and communism...only the right also has blood and tradition to support their claim, communists have nothing, literally.
The opportunists were born from this cynical realization.
Now the theory was just a means to an end, and the end was hedonism, materialism, power. They saw in populism a tool to usurp capitalists and take over exploiting the sheeple.
They learned that from Abrahamism's origins - pre-Christian.  
Parasitism.
In many countries the communist party was split in two - neo-Marxism was born.
They could care less about freeing slaves, ending exploitation, justice for all, fairness...all they cared about was power, and they would do anything to get it.

An opportunity to overthrow capitalism and establish themselves as the overlords of the sheeple that would not rise up.
Marxism, like Christianity, became a means - the bait.
Sell love and hope and justice, and deny free-will, deny human nature, deny nature altogether, deny reality if necessary.
There is no truth, no morality, so anything goes.

01.25.2022

Marxism is secularized Christianity; Christianity is victim psychology of Judaism; Judaism is a synthesis and corruption of Zoroastrianism and Egyptian spirituality.

Like an individual's identity, it is a continuum connected by memories represented by semiotics, words/numbers, i.e., symbols.
The distinction of mind/body becomes one of referring/connecting or disconnecting from perceptual, i.e., tangible, sensually experienced, interrelations of sense data.

*In Marxism, and then Postmodernism- god of Abraham is replaced by man.
God creator of something from nothing, is replaced by man creator of himself out of nothing and nowhere.
Man is "thrown into the world", as it were, from nothingness and nowhere.

*Separation of praxis and theory is the separation of mind from body.
Only mind - consciousness - identifies and wills.
Because body is neither the source of identity nor of will man experiences will as a product of an external agency, his own body from which he has become alienated.
Identity - as in postmodernism - is now the mind's domain. It creates it despite the body - out of nothing and nowhere or out of society, which is a product of collective mental work, i.e., a shared theory.

*Hierarchy is, therefore, also a theoretical construct having nothing to do with the body, entirely of the mind.

*Mind wants to "cast off all limitations" - natural, physical. The mind wants to liberate itself from the body, from the tangible, the physical, from praxis and become theoretical, i.e., abstract, idea.

Like all nihilistic dogmas and ideologies - memes - it must self-contradict in order to survive in a world it either misunderstands or denies.
The fact that its own beliefs are erroneous - naïve, delusional, utopian - can never be considered, so their failures are always about some occult agency, some evil entity.

We see this in play in the current American systemic collapse.
The lie, there, being that race is a "social construct".
But the lie can be anything. In Marxism one of its many lie is that there can be a system with no exploitation.
Another is that an ant-like system is possible for an organism such as man.

Understanding what the difference was between Stalin and Trotsky, and how this leads to "American" neo-cons requires some insight challenging convectional understanding of right/left political binaries and historical rejection of the official historical narratives as these have been revised and propagated after the end of the war onward.


I'll post some fascinating alternatives in Hyperborea, delivered through quotations.

Like all nihilistic ideologies - secular or spiritual (Abrahamism) - they must contradict their own ideological principles if they hope to survive a world they completely or selectively deny.
All claim to have never been "understood" nor to ever have been applied "correctly" - not even by their own followers.; all use obscurantism, mysticism, to conceal the disparity between their ideals and the real - also serving as a way of remaining forever misunderstood and misapplied since later followers can claim to have broken the code and to have understood what nobody else has before.
Plausible deniability.
This enables these ideologies to remain eternally viable, eternally applicable, eternally redefinable.
Constant failures to produce their ideal man can be excused as a matter of misinterpretation and misunderstanding...and be applied over and over again.
Failure is, in fact, part of its appeal, because victims is what it attracts and victims it needs to preserve its seductive appeal to reason; failure is what continues the struggle against reality, against natural order, against the world.
Success would be, literally, a final and compete end - of existence, of the struggle to "correct" the imperfections of the world, forcing it to face itself....finally.
So success, the ariston, the aristocratic, is the "evil" the anathema, that which makes their "goodness" possible.
What would there be to rebel against if revolution succeeded, once and for all time?        
Who would be left to blame?

See, failure is part of nihilism - it is implied in its own identifier, i.e., nil. It is what makes it so powerful an ideal.
Success would be a positive that contradicts it.

All forms of nihilism - whether spiritual or ideological - are malleable, adjustable, adaptable to any threat because there is no limiting order - such as nature - to restrict it other than effect.
This is how it determines its "power".
How many - quantitative - and what kind - qualitative - minds it manages to coerce, bribe or seduce, determines its "truthiness".
Marxism, for example, changed because it failed to produce its Utopia. With every failure it morphed, appropriating from the resistance, or the nemesis as it identified and evaluated it.
The latest adaptation is described in the vid.
An example of memetic evolution at work.
We also see this in how Christianity managed to survive, despite being entirely unsubstantiated superstition. It adapted to the minds it needed to continue to exist - it did so by appropriating form the knowledge and scientific understanding of every age
Vagueness is how it manages this feat.
All nihilistic types remain vague, obscure, poetic, to one degree or another, so as to be able to be reinterpreted and reinvented every time it is debunked and it fails.


Its ra(n)ge of effect - as I've noted - is the quantity and quality of minds available  for infestation. This is how it measures its validity, ergo popularity is for nihilistic dogmas the highest standard for validation.
What is most attractive (seductive) or promising (bribery) or self-preserving (coercive) manages to affect the largest amount of minds.
There is no objective standard.
All is subjective.

The threat to American hegemony was never the Marxist economic system, they had financed it, and their elites had invented it, as they had Abrahamism. There's no distance between Marxism and Abrahamism if you learn the codes.
The real threat was nationalism. Resources being returned to the people that occupied a territory and not released into the global markets where they could be exploited at the expense of local populations.
Stalin became a threat when he turned against Trotsky's internationalism, and Putin became a threat when he corrected Yeltsin's selling out to American oligarchs that were buying up Russian resources.

They feel threatened by China's nationalism, its focus on ethnicity. Ideology, abstractions, are their bread and butter, but when things become tangible, and return to blood, to genetic identifiers, they tremble, fearing that they will be exposed and decades of nihilistic brainwashing will all be laid to waste.

Connecting the dots:
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Zoroastrianism - Judaism - Christianity, Islam - Gnosticism - Kabbalism - Marxism - Postmodernism...
A causal chain of human insanity. Each crazier then the one before.
Every failure causing a doubling-down, down, down, into the subjective, into Wonderland where the Mad Hater waits for tea.

Insanity: a breaking from reality; an inability to cope with what is; preferring survival to lucidity, lies to an insufferable truth; a method of being noticed, of attaining sympathy, replacing eros with agape as the motivating factor.

I need to read more by him


When I attempted to return words to their original utility by reconnecting terms like "nihilism" or "absolute" and so on, remember what I was accused of by the degenerate on ILP, Zoot?
Of using word "unconventionally".
For him it was about maintaining the Marxist linguistic recipe, and not about using words as connectors to the real, in search of higher degrees of awareness of truth, it was a matter of maintaining ideological jargon and nihilistic detachments. Only then would his utopian fantasies be realistic, viz., when reality itself was redefined subjectively.
Listen to Lindsey's analysis of Marxism. It almost exactly mirrors my own.

Marx was a Gnostic, or was influenced by Gnosticism, as is Kabbalism. Now make your own connections not only to what is occurring in the US but what some charlatans on ILP attempted to do: reinvent Abrahamism after the devastating critique of Nietzsche and the onslaught of Modernity and Marxism.
Superstition is what charlatans peddle - like Marx - and like all con-artists when they fail or their practices are exposed so that they can no longer sell their bullshyte to morons they simply rename the same recipe and try to appropriate the lessons they've learned form their previous failures to resell the same crap to the same kinds of people.

They know there will always be an audience of desperate degenerates seeking for a way out of an indifferent and brutal existence, so they needn't try hard, except to evade those minds that exposed them before, and the time before that, and the time before that....a history of being exposed, punished and then blaming others for their sufferings.

Saul failed, so Marx tried again.....and he failed and then the Frankfurt School of degenerate swindlers are trying again....

You can't kill all parasites without unbalancing nature. viruses and parasites are a necessary part of natural selection.
Instead work on yourself and make yourself immune to their virus, or learn to detect vermin and parasites before they bore into your skin and skull to release the virus directly to your nervous system, and when they adapt and try again, adjust yourself accordingly.

Learn to identify the virus.....understand it because "what you cannot understand you cannot change, nor defend against".
It takes advantage of a weakness in you, in all of us.
They've been selling the same superstitions, changing the words, for centuries.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Kate (@Kate94793608) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

No shit?!!!
Before Stalin purged them and they moved to the US where they kept their hatred and dreamed of revenge..,..like their god.

Plato said a people deserve the leader they have....and their gods reflect who and what they are.
So, every city had its own representative god, e.g., Athena for Athens, Apollo for Sparta...

The one-god of Abraham for?
Yahweh for?
This is the idealization of themselves.
Envious, vindictive, bloodthirsty, authoritarian....why do you think they project these traits as accusations?

Lenin wrote:

Comrade Trotsky has never yet possessed a definite opinion on any single, earnest Marxian question: he has always crept into the breach made by this or that difference, and has oscillated from one side to another.

In this quote we find the seed of Stalin/Trotsky's rift and why Russia became so hated.
A rift that would lead to neo-Marxist opportunism and American neo-cons.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Pupiii (@hunlangos1) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Unfortunately genes die but memes survive having spread from mind to minds.

Voegelin, Eric wrote:

[Under Marxism] Christ the Redeemer is replaced by the steam engine as the promise of the realm to come.

...and god is humanized - brought down to earth, secularized.
The only innovation of the Jews who left the desert after "40 years" with themselves as the "god that chose them".....and nobody else.
An trick all victims were inspired by, leading to the present postmodern day when men choose to "create" themselves anew as women.

Most of those who fought and died for Marxism – and still do – didn't know anything about the ideology; hadn’t read any Communist Manifesto. They did not identify with a proletariat, nor had any conception of economic exploitation. All they knew was that they were becoming impoverished amidst a wealth of resources, and that foreign entities were purchasing resources their homeland produced in abundance forcing them to work and pay, most often at the same price, as foreigners, for resources their homeland produced in abundance. They were being reduced to penury in their own homelands by faceless, nameless, internationalists promoting open borders and open markets – see USA.
Some of them turned their anger towards their own kin of wealth and privilege, seeing there a face and finding there a name they could focus their frustrations upon. Internationalist Marxism turned people against their own compatriots, on their own blood, exploiting man’s natural envy and competitiveness towards what is superior to himself.
Gradually some broke away from the spell of cosmopolitan Capitalism and international Marxism. They became national socialists, or ethno-socialists, and the schism between Stalinism and Trotskyism began to grow.

Abrahamism failed when its prophesies failed to materialize - despite tis inherent obscurantism and mysticism, and despite their attempt to convert them to self-fulfilling.
Marxism picks up this failure and attempts to produce a 'heaven on earth' - Utopia - rather than wait for it after-death...and it fails when it rejects or misunderstands human nature.
It adapts and becomes opportunistic neo-Marxism where the few intellectuals would work from within capitalism to increase suffering so as to then trigger the mases to rebellion.....and it failed - again, because of their misunderstanding of how human nature and capitalism coincide.
Is there no "exploitation in nature", for instance? But natural selection is about exploitation.
Now the same victim, herd values, are reinventing themselves through postmodernism - via the Frankfurt School's influence (the same culprits are behind all three attempts; the same ones that also deny free-will, racial and sexual identity etc.); reinventing themselves from class warriors, to opportunistic manipulators, into linguistic artisans, using feminine manipulations to undermine civilization psychologically: cutting into their sense of self, their confidence, their trust in their own senses, especially their eyes.


Isn't hatred of other, a defensive reaction to a threat?
Isn't it, often, self-hatred, distrust in oneself; lack of confidence in oneself, compensating, projected outward?
Isn't undermining and subversion an admission that you fear direct conflict with them?

Cultural Marxism, a.k.a., secular Abrahamism, a.k.a., Postmodernism....

They change the names and the world, but they are addicted, obsessed with the same exact idea/ideal - nihilistic concept, abstraction, ideology.

Could we be seeing another Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact?

Contrary to historical consensus the non-aggression pact between the Soviet Union & Germany wasn’t just about buying time so the USSR could prepare itself, but primarily to play the western capitalist powers against each other. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Mirek (@mirekziek) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

From at least 2 years ago

And Queer Marxism is derived from Abrahamism, and its worship of the incorporeal, intangible, and denial of the physical, i.e., body.
It is part of a ideological continuum that changes its symbols and language but maintains its core ideas/ideals.
It evolves.....because memes evolve like genes do.
What doesn't kill them, makes them stronger.
They adapt by appropriating and corrupting the ideas that challenged and defeated them, e.g., Nietzsche, Hellenism, Hinduism, Heraclitus...

*************
[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
It doesn't define itself, because it is simply a negation of what is defined.
It does not prove itself, because it is the negation of what offers proof.
It does not rationalize itself, because it is against all rationalizations.

So...
What is women?
For them,....whatever is not man.
What is man?
For them,....whatever is not woman.
This is how they emote - calling it "thinking".
They are anti-life, anti-world, anti-nature, anti-philosophy....anti.....negation....nullification.

All that they do is destroy, undermine....subvert....negate.
They worship chaos.
Saturn.....moon....
Time that eats/destroys, its children.
Moon that does not shine but only reflects light.

****************
This is what [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] has become.
Its "freedoms" are negations of all that holds the mind "trapped" by the physical, the tangible, the body.
Even its money - its currency - is intangible - "liberated from the gold standard".
What is money?
A form of exchange...a language.

It sheds alot of light on how the insane ILP subjectivist conjured his "fractured and fragmented self" concept. The indefiniteness and undefinability of reality. Anything goes. No "self" to order any values to any objectives. Nothing can be known as "normal", and so any heiarchy can be inverted where anything inferior can be superior, that is, as long as there is enough collective consensus around to make it so.

These freaks have a love affair with politics and ideology because only by living in thier heads, and vicariously through other people's heads, can they make themselves relevant and even powerful in a heiarchy.

Lmaoooo [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Lady of the Southern Cross‍ (@Lady_Astor) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

All is perfect in theory, none in practice.
Theory is useless if it cannot be applied, in fact.
It is better to know how it manifested in the world, rather than how it was supposed to be practiced within an idealized worlds of the mind.
Theory must be read and used for comparison; juxtaposed to practice.

What does it matter how Marxist intellectuals imagined their perfect theory, in a perfect world, populated by ideal humans?
It matters only because it helps us study gene/meme dissonance, and how they blamed humanity for their theory's failures.
The theory remained "divine"...perfect....like the Abrahamic one-god.
It was the world, humanity, that had failed to "correctly" practice its 'sacred scripture.'
Marxism evolved under the threat to its existence - just as all organisms.
It is now like nothing written in its original manifesto. It has been rewritten and revised, by the Frankfurt School; it has been reinvented as postmodernism. It had to.
When I say reinvented I mean, reworded- as always nihilism remains linguistic.
Abrahamism changes its semiology, and its contexts - under the pressures of extinction - to become Marxism, and Marxism - failing to produce its ideal man - has now semiotically evolved into postmodernism; economic contexts, concealing morality, has now become moral contexts, concealing economics.

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Rothmus (@Rothmus) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

^ If you've been a good child then you get a reward from the father-figure.