Know Thyself Nothing in Excess |
| | |
Author | Message |
---|
Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Sun May 05, 2019 4:50 am | |
| The narcissist, egomaniac, inevitably destroys their own esteem, as they look down on everyone around them that is expressing towards them any gratitude or appreciation. Having no measure, or having little measure with great arrogance. To the egomaniacal, they are the greatest of victims; surrounded by the supposed lame and uncomprehending while they're born victims of some scapegoat; whatever sells their victimhood best. Capitalism, etc. If it were ever chalked up to some inexorable nature of themselves, then it would cease being 'victimhood' and a direct affront to their ego. |
| | | OnWithTheirHead hero
Gender : Posts : 601 Join date : 2017-01-05 Location : .
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Sun May 05, 2019 2:47 pm | |
| - Impulso Oscuro wrote:
Obvious solution is, to have a Female Only force instead of a mixed brigade. Sort of like how there is Air Force and Marines, there would be a new division called Female Force. |
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37248 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Sun May 05, 2019 2:55 pm | |
| Another solution....castrate males so all become a de facto 'female brigade'. Just imagine the lesbian parties. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Sun May 05, 2019 3:38 pm | |
| I have a better idea, genius one could say, let women in as long as they pass all the testing at the same standard as males and go through the whole training/selection process being treated exactly as males are, being with males at all times as all the other males are. |
| | | Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Mon May 06, 2019 2:54 am | |
| - Slaughtz wrote:
- The narcissist, egomaniac, inevitably destroys their own esteem, as they look down on everyone around them that is expressing towards them any gratitude or appreciation. Having no measure, or having little measure with great arrogance. To the egomaniacal, they are the greatest of victims; surrounded by the supposed lame and uncomprehending while they're born victims of some scapegoat; whatever sells their victimhood best. Capitalism, etc. If it were ever chalked up to some inexorable nature of themselves, then it would cease being 'victimhood' and a direct affront to their ego.
This condition means that the subject will mistake any superiority by another as either a "hiding of inferiority"; "overcompensation" (if a subject with such a condition has the intelligence to perceive that), as 'unjustly given' some benefit to achieve that position, or (if it is to the subject's interest) they will treat the other as supernaturally superior in some capacity; or at least superior to their own inflated idea(l) of themselves, to the point almost of scyophancy. If ever the other fails somehow that inflated idea(l), they've created a mark of 'inferiority' whereupon they justify resentment against them, or at least competitive hatred - not competitive becoming/striving. This is the resentment of the feminized. Anything superior, they must integrate into themselves or dominate. For feminized males, they do not have the option of bearing children, so they will instead act as a 'woman scorned'. |
| | | AutSider
Gender : Posts : 1684 Join date : 2015-04-29 Location : none
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Thu May 09, 2019 7:41 am | |
| - polishyouth wrote:
- I have a better idea, genius one could say, let women in as long as they pass all the testing at the same standard as males and go through the whole training/selection process being treated exactly as males are, being with males at all times as all the other males are.
ikr, nice parody of Sargon level centrism I used to think (well not exactly "think", more like "was brainwashed to believe") excluding women from certain things is evil outdated bigotry. Then I acquired experience with women in these things and started rethinking this position. Then I slowly began to grasp why our ancestors had some of the traditions they had and excluded women from certain things, and the rational underpinnings of it. |
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37248 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Thu May 09, 2019 9:40 am | |
| Why are degenerates desperate?
-Because the determining past is immutable. Chaos/Order has manifested as presence - the present- and cannot be changed. Past being continuously made present - interpreted as appearance - can only be dealt with, i.e., reacted to, compensated for, stoically endured, accepted or rejected, denying it substantiality.
-Because in their degeneracy they only contributed to what they inherited, digging themselves deeper into degeneracy...to the point where now they must make it seem intentional, or inevitable, or as 'good'.
-Because in their youth, when they could apply the highest degree of intervention, they failed to perceive their own condition, and now, in their elderly years they have no energies sufficient to deal with their inherited degeneracy, nor even to 'correct' their own contributions to it.
-Because, set in their ways, they've adopted icons/idols to stand-in their place - so they can stand aside and behind, unable to offer the resistance they once did to external threats.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Wed May 15, 2019 4:06 pm | |
| I dont get the issue here, outside of the 'Evolian' spiritual and dignity oriented dillema of roles and formations having spiritual and civic life...If she can do the job as well as a man then why cant she do the job of a man?, I can reassure you that a woman that would get onto a battlefield without feminist brainwashing and lowered standards would not make you pee-pee go ding-ding in a million years and a smoking hot sauna... Both of yous critiques seem ridicolous to me, one of you seems to be suggesting that men should be treated more like women and have their weakness and feelings faciliated by rejecting...woman in the army, and the other is saying that a woman cant do a mans job though she can do mans job because she is a woman... |
| | | Impulso Oscuro
Gender : Posts : 796 Join date : 2013-12-10 Age : 33 Location : Praxis
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Wed May 15, 2019 7:38 pm | |
| - polishyouth wrote:
- I dont get the issue here, outside of the 'Evolian' spiritual and dignity oriented dillema of roles and formations having spiritual and civic life...If she can do the job as well as a man then why cant she do the job of a man?, I can reassure you that a woman that would get onto a battlefield without feminist brainwashing and lowered standards would not make you pee-pee go ding-ding in a million years and a smoking hot sauna...
Both of yous critiques seem ridicolous to me, one of you seems to be suggesting that men should be treated more like women and have their weakness and feelings faciliated by rejecting...woman in the army, and the other is saying that a woman cant do a mans job though she can do mans job because she is a woman... When you are cut off from interactions with women, your standards tend to drop and even the most unattractive woman will appear gorgeous after a while. A unit's cohesion is disrupted by a female's introduction as she will likely be taken by one or few of the men, and other men will resent this as a betrayal of their common struggle against an enemy. Its even worse, when its one of those "stoic" women who have a husband back home, and feed on the male's attention while giving nothing to them in return... for a while... until one decides to hold her accountable for her spectacle. Females will also be dismayed/emboldened by such a display becoming conscious of the possibility of not having to be accountable for being a woman and feeling jealous at the one who doesn't have to, to the same degree. _________________ Once more, with knowing.
The meek shall inherit the Earth, but the Noble shall take it.
|
| | | Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Thu May 16, 2019 3:47 am | |
| If females do more for the supposed battle by fighting, then let them fight. If they do more by reproducing (huh, the importance of; if in a monogamous society; giving soldiers time off to impregnate their wives every year/year and a half), then let them make the nation. It's neither an issue of men being distracted, nor of machismo/proving oneself (and that somehow 'threatened' by female participation). If a female will fight, at the last lines, to protect her children; who would not let her?
Hypermasculine Abrahamism emphasizes this 'blaming of the woman' for showing so little as an ankle. It also created this bastard son of uncompromising, taken for granted, societal roles. The reality, no matter how true in the past of male's physical superiority, is the gun.
Unfortunately, many women are dumb and see the reproduction for a nation as being 'cattle', not as reproducing a future for themselves. They get seduced by ideas that they are reproducing for nothing, because a battle is long - or ends up long. Like any human without context, being 'in the moment', they question whereupon the battle started. And with Abrahamism, the worldly reason is moot.
Female 'empowerment' has made them puffed up in their own ability - not so much physically, though it's the case, but in their actual power as an organism. Fertility is correlated with perceptions of safety, and safety with perception of power, and power with perception of opportunity. Women are being 'white pilled to death'. What stops them is reality: there's no Mr. Perfect. And, they're convinced it's an injustice they're capable of resolving by being puffed up, but aren't very smart: waiting, or thinking the so-called 'empowerment activism' makes them appealing. |
| | | perpetualburn
Gender : Posts : 955 Join date : 2013-01-04 Location : MA
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Thu May 16, 2019 2:14 pm | |
| - polishyouth wrote:
- I have a better idea, genius one could say, let women in as long as they pass all the testing at the same standard as males and go through the whole training/selection process being treated exactly as males are, being with males at all times as all the other males are.
- Quote :
- I dont get the issue here, outside of the 'Evolian' spiritual and dignity oriented dillema of roles and formations having spiritual and civic life...If she can do the job as well as a man then why cant she do the job of a man?,
Because brotherhoods are sacred even "outside" of Evolian interpretations. They preserve and carry on the traditions. It would even go as far to say friendship is the very bedrock of culture. The intrusion of women into all areas that are traditionally masculine (under the guise of women just trying to prove themselves "fairly") is one of the left's key strategies in breaking down the bonds that hold together everything sacred. But logistically speaking, the best woman will still be taking a spot from a man who can do better because biology. It is interesting though that women are allowed now to try out for the police and even elite special operations units (in the US anyways), but they won't let a woman fight a man one on one in boxing or mma (which is just a sport)... Like, that would be too unfair... but a woman getting shot in the head because she signed up for a combat role in the military, is perfectly fine.... she is allowed to prove she is one of the guys there... where nothing is televised. _________________ And here we always meet, at the station of our heart / Looking at each other as if we were in a dream /Seeing for the first time different eyes so supreme / That bright flames burst into vision, keeping us apart.
|
| | | AutSider
Gender : Posts : 1684 Join date : 2015-04-29 Location : none
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Thu May 16, 2019 3:09 pm | |
| polishyouth, Evola writes too much about magical nonsense, this guy (and propertarianism in general) is if you want to actually understand reality: I'd add that army requires a masculine predisposition, meaning it would require/reward masculinity in women, meaning it would incentivize women to become more masculine, which is contrary to the interests of healthy masculine men and would in turn require their emasculation, also resulting in lower attraction between men and women, resulting in less babies being born, all of which results in less overall men for the army (not to mention less men), hence how accepting women in the army inevitably results in a weaker army. TL;DR: the benefits gained by accepting the few competent women are outweighed by the costs You just haven't thought it through. Or maybe you're a master troll and we've all been had. _________________ "WOMEN BAD, CHURCH GOOD, NIGGERS BAD, WHITE GOOD, EUROPE CUCKED, PATRARCHY GOOD, ARISTOCRACY GOOD, DEMOCRACY BAD" - polishyouth
|
| | | Impulso Oscuro
Gender : Posts : 796 Join date : 2013-12-10 Age : 33 Location : Praxis
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Thu May 16, 2019 3:19 pm | |
| A female having to defend her offspring is a single mother and already represents a partially castrated family, community, and race that would allow for such a dire situation to occur.
The chosen people dont have any issue using their women as instruments of war in order to serve their ideal, using all resources available like the misers they are.
War is more than the tools used, it's an attitude, combat stress deteriorates women faster than men, both physically and mentally. Despite women being allowed in the infantry, there is a reason why you never see them in combat footage. _________________ Once more, with knowing.
The meek shall inherit the Earth, but the Noble shall take it.
|
| | | Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Thu May 16, 2019 4:07 pm | |
| We live in a topsy-turvy 'world' where women are 'excused' for being sluts, so they think they are not anti-social or anti-sexual (in the world, anti-reproductive), but freely use contraception in the meantime, making their activity pathological. So they can pretend they're evolutionarily successful while they murder their own babies. They get rid of the cost to their supposed 'success' and accuse any who would impose the costs again of being 'anti-success', 'anti-woman', or 'anti-sex', 'anti-social' (anti-reproductive). - Impulso Oscuro wrote:
- A female having to defend her offspring is a single mother and already represents a partially castrated family, community, and race that would allow for such a dire situation to occur.
Dire situations are what moves evolution forward, and ignoring those circumstances is a weakness, not a boon. Fighting tooth and nail (and their breaking and tearing) is sometimes necessary - and it's sometimes a case of brother vs. brother. As I wrote elsewhere, nations ( natal) are made by women; civilizations and states, disciplinary institutions, by men. It's a modern confusion now that men think they're to do anything about the nation except protect it and enforce their laws - the women, the nation, must either choose or it be chosen (by no other options available - sometimes at the hand of competitive men; hence the whinging about 'haters of diversity' by dumb feminists) they're there. This, of course, can be interpreted to the point of those men saying they must 'oppress all the wimminz'. None advocate that, there's always more subtlety, but the extreme expressions of it (even moderate ones) are not a long-term solution; a short-term one to deal with a symptom of nihilism. I've already argued elsewhere with AutSider on this, we differ on two fundamental positions: the tenability of civilization(s). Beyond tribes. One is that civilization is a nihilistic construct, with tribes being their own. I do not think the unification of Germany (Germanic tribes) under the idea(l), icon, of Arminius was nihilistic. Neither would I see the unification of Aryans under Hitler, nor the white race under a racialist icon. So, it could be a weakness of the nation, in sexual choice or allowance, to be put into that position - and they'd sooner surrender. Or a weakness of the governance, state, that it would be conquered. But, it could be a case that women are facing a nihilistic enemy which does not seek anything but total obliteration. Such circumstances aren't unheard of today, and call the nihilistic Abrahamism (gone seen or unseen) a weakness, but it's a fact as such today - no matter its blemishing every nation/state. Certainly, it's not always nihilistic - if those women are lower quality and the men have women at home (i.e. not castrated), then there's no compunction about destroying them or leaving them as helots. EDIT: But you did not say 'weakness', you said 'castration' (partial). Nihilism does this anyway, affecting every aspect of human existence. |
| | | Impulso Oscuro
Gender : Posts : 796 Join date : 2013-12-10 Age : 33 Location : Praxis
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Thu May 16, 2019 5:42 pm | |
| Forward and downward, its not the "ignoring" that's the problem, its the "obsession" that has leveled everything down. The obsession with premeditation and the psychosis that seeks to dominate the whole Earth so it never has to feel stress ever again. Perhaps it might be pragmatic to unify against this force, but even this adaptation itself is a victory for the worshipers of entropy.
Are we to place pragmatism above all else? _________________ Once more, with knowing.
The meek shall inherit the Earth, but the Noble shall take it.
|
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Fri May 17, 2019 2:59 pm | |
| - Quote :
- I have a better idea, genius one could say, let women in as long as they pass all the testing at the same standard as males and go through the whole training/selection process being treated exactly as males are, being with males at all times as all the other males are.
- Quote :
- I dont get the issue here, outside of the 'Evolian' spiritual and dignity oriented dillema of roles and formations having spiritual and civic life...If she can do the job as well as a man then why cant she do the job of a man?,
I stand by what I said, modern army and fighters aside, the women that would get through the selection process pre humanization acts implemented across Europe around 80s with all the unrestricted violence and bullying and hellish mental and physical pressure would be freaks...they would only be women because of their pussy(and could not have well developed sexual organs because they would not get through some of the required physical exercises...), nothing else...Can you imagine what kind of mental fortitude a woman would have to have to go through all the bullying that she would have to go through in the barracks for both being a woman and being a freak of a woman plus all the training layed on top of it?, she would be a killing machine that could never be a good mother in the civilian environment and would have to have an incredbile mental strentgh, far beyond the average male recruit, plus she couldnt be a 'dyke' because she would get called a dyke by the drill sergants(meaning she would also have to think more or less like a man), so why not let these women fight? I dont need Curt Dolittle or some self-rightous fat cunt to contradict my own experiences...I've met women like this, and I know the only difference between us is our reproductive organs and that those kinds of 'freaks' could function well in the military and not be an obstruction... Plus if she was some kind of a freak that was seeking revenge for natures wrongdoings she wouldnt be able to socialize with other males like a male and would be socially excluded and then gotten rid of for that reason...its quite easy once you let reality work itself out... |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Fri May 17, 2019 3:14 pm | |
| You people speak to me like I am an imbecyle...if somebody spoke to me like that in real life I'd smack them on the face...maybe I am secretly a woman and wanted into army with all the autistic and emasculated soldiers of Europa and now I got rejected and I am having an anger tantrum...I will go down to the dungeon and consult my feelings with our psychoanalyst trixxie666666, ciaooo, friends... |
| | | Impulso Oscuro
Gender : Posts : 796 Join date : 2013-12-10 Age : 33 Location : Praxis
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Fri May 17, 2019 4:54 pm | |
| If she has to fight, then her tribe has failed her, so what is she really fighting for? Her existence is a near-guarantee, so it seems to me she is fighting for more than just failed blood, but an ideal that blood no longer truly represents. [You must be registered and logged in to see this image.]Such a tragedy to not be satisfied with the men around you, and seeking him in death, solemnity is the most sincere form of insult. _________________ Once more, with knowing.
The meek shall inherit the Earth, but the Noble shall take it.
|
| | | Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Sat May 18, 2019 3:01 am | |
| Fighting against that idea(l), in response to it, is not always the equivalent of fighting for - or the submission to its dichotomy by responding; like many SJWs say. "To be against, be a bulwark against, homosexuality, means you're gay", etc.
If a woman protects her children from bears, fighting, then there is no confusion as to what she fights for. If she protects her children from nihilists, unbearably disgusted with them - treating them as non-human as many do - then there's no confusion about that. |
| | | OnWithTheirHead hero
Gender : Posts : 601 Join date : 2017-01-05 Location : .
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Sat May 18, 2019 10:04 am | |
| - Satyr wrote:
- Another solution....castrate males so all become a de facto 'female brigade'.
Just imagine the lesbian parties. Gave up on the idea many moons ago. Nowadays I'm more of a bitter and grim person. Years of observing eunuchs has led me to conclude half of them are unapproachable NPCs, half are into guys, and if lesbian parties did occur, it would be sexless and corporate. Spiritual people are saying we are transitioning into a 5D world, yet all I see is a vapid 5G world, wolf-on-wall-street corporate world, blade runner dystopia. |
| | | Impulso Oscuro
Gender : Posts : 796 Join date : 2013-12-10 Age : 33 Location : Praxis
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Sat May 18, 2019 12:05 pm | |
| - Slaughtz wrote:
- Fighting against that idea(l), in response to it, is not always the equivalent of fighting for - or the submission to its dichotomy by responding; like many SJWs say. "To be against, be a bulwark against, homosexuality, means you're gay", etc.
But it does mean you have become weak enough to even require a bulwark in the first place. Of course were not perfect and these nihilists will accept nothing less than perfection but I'd say being sick to the degree of even having "SJWs" is a symptom of a deeper sickness than just the common cold. - Slaughtz wrote:
- If a woman protects her children from bears, fighting, then there is no confusion as to what she fights for. If she protects her children from nihilists, unbearably disgusted with them - treating them as non-human as many do - then there's no confusion about that.
Depends, is the husband away, dead, or too weak of a man? So far our discussion has alluded to the latter two situations, both of which support what I mentioned before. Defending against an animal is not the same as defending against an organized foreign tribe. _________________ Once more, with knowing.
The meek shall inherit the Earth, but the Noble shall take it.
|
| | | Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Sat May 18, 2019 3:25 pm | |
| Entropy is a fact of this world, as Satyr has mentiones about the female's laughing at man's fight, but simultaneously enthralled by it. If you do not have idea(l) perfection (itself, as a demand, part of the nihilist dichotomy), then you have 'pragmatism'. Not short-sighted, long-sighted.
Perfection as a concept is the reification of an absent thing, a possibility and feeling. What one has as reference is something more along the lines of the chimera talked about by Hegel. For 'perfection' it ignores flaws, costs. Aa in nature, to(the) ignore(ance) is not an option. Blood sickle cell anemia is a weakness compensating for a greater weakness.
That all our problems are not as resolvable as physical pairing with an ant, is not always an overall weakness. Foreign tribes fighting is a human aspect: human sexual type being heterosexual reproduction, requiring two. To the species, the male/female 'dichotomy' advances the race (and species) in its own way. The so-called idea(l) would have no need for reproduction entirely.
It is not as simple as rigid societal roles; but rational masculine/feminine behavior.
With regards to the husband, I have continually been using the example of men being at war and reproducing every year/year and a half. This is 'away'. When it comes to pragmatic evaluation of nihilism today, men are not "away", but are actually nihilists themselves. Sure this can devolve into 'purity spiraling' what is/isn't nihilistic, but the fact is civilization is young as a phenomenon and nihilism itself is relatively new in the years of what our species continued to be (10,000 years? Nothing compared to several hundred million for all life on Earth). Call an unprepared immune system a 'weakness', but nothing proves but the day after, the future. The failure of that people can be a result of an adaptation which simultaneously is responsible for a great strength (ie sickle cell).
I am not saying nor ever said that this is always the case, there are damaged, mutations, that are not complimented by benefits.
Of course your position, will be that if there are no benefits it is a weakness. If there are benefits, it is still a weakness. Or that in the latter case, with nihilism, it appears inconsistent with what I said about treating nihilists as anathema. That is because nihilists are dangerous, like being suicidal and attempting to kill everyone else whom won't worship them/their god. And nihilism is a self-diagnosis, to say nothing of any foreign tribe's schizophrenia as an all-or-nothing "we must live" adaptation which destroys all life affirming values. Again, 2,000 years? Maybe 10,000? Nothing in the context of life, especially with the comparative influence humans have on their habitat.
The entire reason to say it is a 'weakness' is to justify the nihilist expression of rigidity in the gender/sexual roles. Yes, not being ignore(ant) is more pragmatic. And why strive for an idea(l) when doing so and saying "at least I wasn't called racist.. Or 'weak'" results in a contradiction of principle, and life? |
| | | AutSider
Gender : Posts : 1684 Join date : 2015-04-29 Location : none
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Sat May 18, 2019 4:50 pm | |
| - Me wrote:
- this guy (and propertarianism in general) is
if you want to actually understand reality _________________ "WOMEN BAD, CHURCH GOOD, NIGGERS BAD, WHITE GOOD, EUROPE CUCKED, PATRARCHY GOOD, ARISTOCRACY GOOD, DEMOCRACY BAD" - polishyouth
|
| | | Impulso Oscuro
Gender : Posts : 796 Join date : 2013-12-10 Age : 33 Location : Praxis
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Fri May 24, 2019 7:14 pm | |
| Nothing wrong with some physical, marksman, and memetic training but setting that as the ideal for any woman is more of a waste than if such efforts were focused on a brother or son. Such training tends to result in delayed/dysfunctional reproduction and reduced loyalty so if you don't mind such costs, then so be it. _________________ Once more, with knowing.
The meek shall inherit the Earth, but the Noble shall take it.
|
| | | Slaughtz
Gender : Posts : 2593 Join date : 2012-04-28 Age : 33 Location : A stone.
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Sat May 25, 2019 3:23 am | |
| Abrahamic monogamous societies require the 'reduced loyalty' concern. I have no interest in subsidizing masculine power, no more than feminine. If you cannot earn your place in the hierarchy, and if you cannot appreciate the nation enough where you're letting them do work towards their and your ends, then you're afflicted with Abrahamic hypermasculinity.
One calls repression a 'strength', like one calls a tourniquet for bleeding; despite causing long-term damage. This is not an 'absolute' judgment - it's a matter of degrees. Men who can tolerate more of a female's freedom without losing evolutionarily are 'flocked' to by females. If one ignores other men, in the process, one's liable for death. This struggle is mortal.
As you said; costs.
Last edited by Slaughtz on Sat May 25, 2019 3:26 am; edited 1 time in total |
| | | Anfang
Gender : Posts : 3989 Join date : 2013-01-23 Age : 40 Location : Castra Alpine Grug
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Sat May 25, 2019 3:25 am | |
| If you are not sexually attracted to the woman then of course you would relate to her as your "buddy". And what do not sexually attracted buddies do? - They share their hobbies and interests together. They are not sexist and they really, really are not sexist, nothing sexual going on there. |
| | | AutSider
Gender : Posts : 1684 Join date : 2015-04-29 Location : none
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Sat May 25, 2019 8:26 pm | |
| Men fantasize about silly concepts like female loyalty because it would mean being able to keep a woman for free, without having to pay the costs. It is a moralism, a form of parasitism. - Slaughtz wrote:
- Men who can tolerate more of a female's freedom without losing evolutionarily are 'flocked' to by females.
And animals who can tolerate more parasites on them, are flocked to by parasites. Societies which can tolerate more parasites on them, also... That they are able to tolerate parasites, is a sign they are strong (for now). That they are willing to, is a weakness. It isn't necessarily about winning/losing in an absolute sense. It can be about maximizing benefits and minimizing costs. Just because one can tolerate something without "losing", whatever your threshold for that may be, doesn't mean it is optimal to do so. The right has adopted this subversive, inverted idea of strength that it is tolerance for too long, and we all know and see the results. The strong are willing and able to be intolerant against that which they dislike. _________________ "WOMEN BAD, CHURCH GOOD, NIGGERS BAD, WHITE GOOD, EUROPE CUCKED, PATRARCHY GOOD, ARISTOCRACY GOOD, DEMOCRACY BAD" - polishyouth
|
| | | Impulso Oscuro
Gender : Posts : 796 Join date : 2013-12-10 Age : 33 Location : Praxis
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Sun May 26, 2019 12:31 am | |
| - Slaughtz wrote:
- Abrahamic monogamous societies require the 'reduced loyalty' concern. I have no interest in subsidizing masculine power, no more than feminine. If you cannot earn your place in the hierarchy, and if you cannot appreciate the nation enough where you're letting them do work towards their and your ends, then you're afflicted with Abrahamic hypermasculinity.
Loyalty is not a concern to you? How will you rally your brothers, many of them being eligible bachelors with potential? Whats in it for them when their potential mate is beside them, no longer needing them as a mate. More women for the Alpha? Further dividing his attention among more children, effectively making the women single mothers. Sure, that works until the resentment kicks in and men either leave or rebel, and you don't have the luxury to be THAT exclusive, at least not for long. I get it, we've seen the results of allowing weaker men to proliferate, but despite this there are plenty of average to above average men even today who are strong and need a mate devoted to them first and the state second. - Slaughtz wrote:
One calls repression a 'strength', like one calls a tourniquet for bleeding; despite causing long-term damage. This is not an 'absolute' judgment - it's a matter of degrees. Men who can tolerate more of a female's freedom without losing evolutionarily are 'flocked' to by females. If one ignores other men, in the process, one's liable for death. This struggle is mortal.
As you said; costs. One sexes "freedom" comes at the cost of the other, im all for "open arenas" but to a certain degree "patriarchy" or female repression is masculine freedom in action. _________________ Once more, with knowing.
The meek shall inherit the Earth, but the Noble shall take it.
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37248 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Mon May 27, 2019 9:38 pm | |
| The Desperate Degenerate is convinced that he's overcome Abrahamism - more precisely Christianity - when all he's overcome is his childish addiction to infantile anthropomorphism. He's 'transcended' the fairy tale, but still clings to the underlying characteristics, e.g. absolute one, perfect and eternal order.
He worships 'freedom' but does not believe in free-will, having lost all confidence in his own judgements and his own sensual awareness. He postures, calling himself a 'free-spirit' and a 'free-thinker' - a unique and exceptional character - when all the while he describes the world as a uniform, prison, where nothing ever exceeds the rules or behaves in a way that does not adhere to prescriptions and regulations - more terrified of the implications of his own culpability than those of universal incarceration.
If he is to break free, then it will only be in a complete and perfect way, going from one hyperbole to the other - trapped in his own brain's noetic dualisms. _________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Satyr Daemon
Gender : Posts : 37248 Join date : 2009-08-24 Age : 58 Location : Hyperborea
| Subject: Re: Desperate Degenerates Wed May 29, 2019 6:10 pm | |
| It's the psychosis of degeneracy - the same ailment that leads them towards Nihilism, as a defensive mechanism. For desperate degenerates if you are not 'god', then you must be a feeble slave, and a sinner; if you are not a Capitalism, then you must be a proletariat - Workers of the World Unite!; if you are not absolute master then you must be an innocent victim.
They need something and someone to blame for their predicaments. If not god, as omnipotent Will, then it has to be another Will, some secret power imposing itself upon their innocence; if not concious then it must be another absolute authority, a complete and utter totalitarian, named Order, or One, or some such abstraction implying their parity in feebleness. They are never to blame...nothing they do or can ever do is their fault, to any degree. the cleansing must be absolute, otherwise it is useless to them. You either are or you are not responsible for your own fate. You can';t be a little responsible - that just will not do. Their magnanimous 'courage' can only be an acceptance of their fate, without complaints; an absolute surrender; to even the to escape can be taken as a personal failure, so their submission must be as absolute as the declarative godliness of their counterparts, no the other side of this psychosis; the ones who claim that no matter what occur it was part of their plan - they willed it. On one side the absolute victim and slave to some totalitarian idea, if not an entity; on the other the slave declaring himself an absolute master of himself - a hyperbolic reaction to it, easily marketed to feeble men-children and demanding females.
_________________ γνῶθι σεαυτόν μηδέν άγαν
|
| | | Sponsored content
| | | | |
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |
|