Psychology 101

The Iceman Interview - Analysis of Kuklinski

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Such a simplistic perspective, you have.

Race is about potentials....inherited upper & lower potentials.
It is obvious, at least to me, that race mixing occurs when one is on the upper 10% in intelligence, or beauty, or social standing, and is also ambitious, open to opportunities to advance and to expand possibilities - he/she has a particular psychology.
The easiest way into a group, or individual, is its weakest point...so the upper 10% in a race with lower on-average potential will strive to merge with the bottom 10% or the average in the group with a higher, on-average potential.
Included in the analysis is the restriction of marriage, the moral limit of monogamy, and how lowered possibilities, on one side, can unite with a desire for higher possibilities, on the other, all within a specific environment with specific socioeconomic and moral ideals.
Opportunity determined by social standing attractiveness etc.

Another factor is who is mixing.
Is it a European male with an African female, or the opposite - is it an Asian female with a Negro or Caucasian.....
These details are important.
Females are sperm samplers, and practice hypergamy - she seeks advancement through mating.
Males are seeders, driven to spread their seed as much as possible - and this comes forth in their drive to spread their intellectual beliefs, their political and philosophical views.
Then there's their psychology - are they alphas, betas, gammas, deltas, or omegas?

Then there's genetic drift, the unforeseen, the effect of chaos/randomness upon everything.
This black/white way of trying to discredit the concept of races, is a mark of a simple mind seeking simple excuses to discredit, ridicule and dismiss.

Race is but the foundation.
It establishes the individual's inherited averages of potential in all traits, one of which is intelligence.

If you feel insecure about something, all you need to do is mystify it by redefining the concept, beginning with the word used to represent it.

I have a friend who dislikes himself....and I say this because he refuses to accept my definition of the concept 'self', which is testable, down to earth, and empirical. He prefers to mystify the concept of 'self' so that he can never face it, find it, try to come to terms with it.
He goes on the internet and finds these retarded gurus who give him spiritual definitions that refer to nothing experienced, or that allude to other concepts, vague enough to mean anything and everything - nothing.
Every time I talk to him he's looking for himself - seeking this elusive concept...looking for an identity he's redefined into non-existence.

I told him that the easiest way to get rid of something real is to redefine the word referring to it in mystical ways.
Take the organism we call 'horse', and other cultures give their own name to it.
Greeks called it a-logo.....no-logos. The organism that lacks logos.
French call it cheval.....no matter what word/symbol you use all refer to the same organism (phenomenon), with specific traits, behaviours - an appearance.

Let's say some imbecile is afraid of horses and wants them to 'disappear' so that he doesn't have to deal with them.
He can redefine the concept in the same way we define a horse-like mystical version called 'unicorn'.
He can now seek this elusive creature, debate over its essence, spend his time finding unicorn experts, or mystics...
He can pretend to be seeking what he himself has made impossible to find, by redefining the word 'horse' to mean a magical fantasy....like unicorn, or 'centaur'....and he can spend a lifetime finding justifications for their existence, using innuendo, mysticism, esotericism etc.

Refusing to see the horse, in front of his eyes, rejecting it as illusory, or declaring it a social construct...he will use his redefinition of the word 'horse' to evade its presence.

The Abrahamics did the same with the word 'god'....and my friend does it with the word 'self'.
Others do it to words like 'sex', 'race'...'gender', 'love'.....'morality'...
Any word can be manipulated in this way.
Pure Nihilists use this redefinition to reject all definitions, and with it the one that they are afraid of - the one that connects the concept to an experienced phenomenon they cannot escape.
Positive Nihilists do it to usurp the mundane definition and replace it with a fantasy, supernatural, one.

My friend hates who and what he is....and so he uses this linguistic ruse to reject what is reflected back at him, daily; refusing to accept what he sees as his lineage...in order to both escape this past, he despises, and to pretend he is interested in finding himself, and seeing who and what he is.
But he doesn't really. He only wants to replace the obvious, with something more ideal, more flattering....better.
These types make words an issue....a problem for philosophy, that isn't really a problem.

Although 'self' is a complex issue it can be defined pragmatically.....and though it cannot be fully known, it can be perceived.
Just as the horse is. An organism you can dedicate a lifetime studying it....but not magical, not an idea you cannot perceive.

What is furthest from us, seems more divine, more promising.
What is most alien to us seems godly, mysterious.

For a retard genius appears mystical in essence.
For the feeble power appears sanctifying.
For the ugly beauty appears angelic.

The mind projecting into the alien its deepest anxieties and their antidote, its greatest hopes.

Mother's love is forgiving, comforting, she opens-up to pull you into her non-judgmental embrace – keeping you warm and safe, allowing you to recuperate from your sojourns into the brutal, indifferently cold cosmos.
She has surrendered and endured to bring forth live, and she wants to protect her investment in suffering. Their suffering and needs are her sufferings and needs.
Father's love is uncompromising, harsh, relentless, like the world he is to prepare his children for.
He has sacrificed to birth them, and he will cultivate his risky investment the best he can. Their successes and failures are his. They are his continuing ascent/descent.

The 'by the book' psychology shifts from Scripture to treatise, and from occult knowledge to scientific empiricism.
A social species needs a connection to a collective wisdom - to belong to.
Words become expressions of loyalty.

The hardest thing to come to terms with is the extent of your impotence - the reach of your will.
It begins at birth and suffers a shock in adolescence, some never recover from.
If not, another problem arises from the entitlement this produces.

Maturity is testing the limits your will can break through the natural hierarchy, and learning to not take it personally when it contradicts your intentions.
There's only so much you can do, as a mortal being.
It takes a long time to realize where the line of your interventions ends, and where coming to terms with it begins.
If you could change everything into what you desire and expect, would that be an end, or would boredom and atrophy become a new problem?

Recognizing who is of your kind and who is an alien in all ways but the physical, referring to a shared past, is what discrimination and taste is about.

Humans have developed a way of constructing an image they want others to identify them with.
Jewellery, clothes, cars, vacations, careers, all symbols of their theoretical value in relation to others.
Most of it fake, inflated using methods they picked up along the way.
All displays.
All titles, words, linguistic signalling that takes the real and twists it into a desirable form, usually dictated by the environment which is the socioeconomic system.

A countermeasure is seeing through all that pretence into the core, the substance, the real.
It's a arms race of sorts.
Some use a blanket judgment, carpet bombing, to compensate for a surgical mind, cutting through lies to get to the truth.

Women are gifted at using subtle subliminal signs, that override the signalling and linguistic 'truth fabrication'.
They intuit what they cannot justify, having gathered a multiplicity of data which they are unable to integrate into a lucid mental model.
In many ways this is a more efficient method, because they do not have to integrate the data, like some men are obsessed with doing.
They are content with the utility of the outcome, even if they cannot explain it.

The problem with this is if someone knows this he can manipulate it.

Seduction, deceitful word games, using words to manipulate thoughts, self inflation. Ive noticed it the moment they start opening their mouths.

Theyre changing like cameleon from one day to another, thats how they say theyre adapting, they get suspicious when your intentions are clean, even you state the obvious, they will reject it.

This day theyll follow this leader, the second day theyll justify their leader decision if he changed his alliances.

Ive grew up in a house where my father and mother havent abridged us from anything.
My father passed away and he left us a fortune, not of money but of virtues and distinct among his family.

He was a straightforward man, and maybe thats one of many reasons he wasnt lucky with making money, he wasnt concerned about owning it as much as he was concerned about us and our well being.

I never regret any choice he made in his life, maybe sometimes he felt irritated
Because of his brothers, nevertheless he kept his shoulders back and head high.

I feel proud of him.

Parasites feed on decay.
Scavengers feed on the dying.

There are parasites in every organism and SuperOrganism that feed on the periphery, on the excrement produced by an organic unity. When a culture is in decline they multiply and overwhelm the organism, consuming it while still barely alive.

Meme to Gene
Organism to SuperOrganism
Tribe to City State to Nation
We can divide the cycle in three.
Ascent....Stabilization.....Descent
Expansion/Explosion.....Balance....Implosion

Many tribes survived using the method of parasitism.
We know of the Gypsies and the chosen....both notorious for their Magical, occultist, wealings and dealings, exploiting the weakest, the most desperate and ill.
Superstition continues but it dominates when a civilization is in decline...like cancer is in every body but when the body deteriorates it spreads and deals the final blow.

A common method among con-men, using the same psychological manipulation used when selling fArt to the new-rich, by toying with their vanity, their ego, and their ignorance.

The begins with a desired outcome.
He covets an effect.
Usually he is inspired by an effect produced by another and wants to replicate it. Unable, or unwilling, to follow the path taken the con-man begins with the outcome...the 'positive' outcome and imitates the resulting style.
It's what actors do when using the 'method'. They can't live the live of the individual nor adopt the memories, DNA and experiences, so he imitates the apparent, the behaviour, and then feels how the other might feel by using the same vocal particularities, the same body posture, wearing a mask to appear like the one they are trying to embody.
They read a biography, perhaps, wanting to 'get into their head'.
The goal is the effect.
They want to replicate it.

Unable to imitate the talent, or the genius, he remains on the product of this talent and genius, plagiarizing, copying it, but slightly modifying it to hide the fact.

Then they 'sell' their act, their pretense, to those who want to buy into it, or who are afraid that if they do not they will be excluded, ridiculed, or that they will be exposed as lacking a certain kind of cultivation.


Top<>Down method uses this.
Unable to validate itself against reality, it replaces it with idealism and then selectively samples and modifies reality, redefines it, to make it fit into the starting proposition.
The easiest way to do so without revealing the lie is to use obscurity, offering verbal justifications that impress, lead the mind through twists and turns, imply and emotionally trigger....and yet are saying nothing.
That one part...the other is to use ignorance to imply knowledge which the other cannot or, chances are, will not even attempt to validate on his own. Either the subject requires expert knowledge or research the other is unwilling to do, and he is reluctant to even consider because he desperately wants to believe.  
The choir will never doubt the preachers sermon, even when it diverts from scripture.

The con-man will declare that his ideal, his starting premises, resolves some mysteries plaguing human understanding...so he uses human ignorance to claim more profound knowledge.
He will not justify or qualify his claim, but only repeat it.
When and if he does try to pretend he is justifying and qualifying he will use jargon that implies a specialized understanding but is meaningless, or he will claim that there are no words accurate enough to explain what he knows and the others do not.

An image is built over time, with seemingly casual references to impressive events, or idols, or experts, building a framework of implied believabilty, and cultivation.    
Lacking talent, and a reference which all can appreciate, he compensates by cultivating a public character, a caricature....an image.
Over time and if he manages to convince a few gullible minds, he may begin to believe his own lies, hearing them echoed back to him from his followers, and excluding all who contradict or threaten to expose him.
He immerses himself in a flock...a school....

....he distances himself from the world beyond the cocoon of sycophantic followers, placing himself at the centre - furthest distance form the 'external world'. He engulfs himself in a inter-subjective, womb, and calls this swarm of organic flesh 'world'.
World is now humanity...the species represents the extent of reality. The only place where symbols/words can have power, can hope to produce an effect.
Other become agencies through which he engages the world he knows confronts him, even in the midst of his alternate reality.

Praise, flattery, psychological material aid keeps the school swarming, through some stranglers are lost to predation from those who are outside this cocoon. They are used as examples of what happens to those who distance themselves from the 'word', the messiah, the 'truth'.
Everything is inverted.
What leis outside the cocoon, is evil, or illusion, and what lies within is world, reality, good.
The fish know how dangerous the world is so they jostle for inclusion, pushing their way towards the centre, to glimpse the 'leader', to stand beside him...closest to the centre.....a few jostle to replace him...a few wander towards the periphery willingly...doubting themselves but unable to break free from the pull of the school.
The swirling creates a kind of vortex, pulling all who are in, further inward...making ti harder to pull away, to break loose.


The cocoon becomes a world of its own.
Its members call it freedom when they move in circles....as they think circularly.
Breaking out is a thought they cannot endure thinking.
What leis outside the school?
Uncertainty, the cold ocean, predators....all kinds of indifferent possibilities.

Children and women are ripe for perspectives from the 'persecuted' and 'weak', fearing a hand too rough which might host disregard for its survival. Channeling that fear into political structure can be useful for criminal and amoral elements, to provide interference against any transgression of their impunity.

Children and women have a survival stake in equality and all-inclusivity.
Effete males are more passionate.
For them it's sexual.
This is their only chance to get a mate and have children.

r/ versus K/ survival strategies.
The r/'s will turn on their own people, their own blood....they will form alliances with alien tribes that threaten the authority of their own's tribe's dominant members.
it's not only a case of increasing the potential of their sexual gratification but also a case of vindictiveness: 'If I can't have it then nobody else should'.

Children love fairy-tales, and no matter what women say, flattery and romanticism is preferable to reality.
They love being placed on a pedestal, when they have the 'goods' and only the ugly fat ones pretend to not be interested.
Women love the lie.....but it has to be creative, believable.
They buy into male pretenses when they are trying to seduce them. They know most of it is hyperbole but they love to be swept away....because in this day and age the real deal is hard to find in a world of sheltering.
A female needs to feel a bit intimidated, mystified by a male....like I've said before. This is difficult in a feminized world where the only true alpha allowed is the institution.
Instead of the real-deal they'll settle for the the ersatz, the facsimile to experience their femininity.  

cRAP fArtists are in demand because of the pretenses. A bunch of upper-middle class Negroes pretending to be ex-con playas....
It's about selling the lie.
How do these offspring of slaves sell it?
By using hyperbole.

Variant of the placebo effect:
How do you make insights into human nature even more effective?
You convince the other of what he desperately wants to be true. the myth that there is no human nature, but only human individuals acting in accordance to how they were raised.
In the meantime, all of modern politics and marketing is based on the manipulation of human nature.

The lie is presented as a liberating ideology that makes the other feel unique, special, free.

The practice should be included in the category of human husbandry - farming humans.

The triad of body/nervous system/mind corresponding to past/present/future creates a cognitive field of probabilities within space/time possibilities encompassed by a perceptual-event-horizon.
This noetic field is encompassed by inherited past, through DNA that fades as one proceeds deeper towards its ambiguous beginning, and by a projected objected that fades the further into it the mind projects its abstractions.
Abstractions are simplified/generalized mental models comprised of data collected from exoteric (sensual) and esoteric (intuited) stimulation that have been transmitted to the brain via the nervous system.
Mind is the projection of probabilities, or the evaluations of probabilities.

Based on this I've characterized plants as existing in a two dimensional field of effect: possessing a past (DNA = memories), and a presence (interactivity) but no brain to construct abstractions and project them towards future.
Higher organisms, such as mammals, have that additional expansion of their cognitive field towards future.

The three dimensions represent this cognitive field of probabilities, and the fourth, time, represents change within this cognitive field of conscious and unconscious awareness.
Meditation is the shrinking of the cognitive field, using brain to inhibit mind.
It cannot shrink the body's presence as past made present, but only ignore it.
The shrinking is a reversion to a plant-like state.
It's invigorating effect is due to the elimination of sources of care, producing nervous stress.
The individual feels to be entirely in the 'present' having shrunk the brain's projection into the uncertain future, as mind, and having become detach from the body's manifestation of past made present.
This cannot protect the individual from the world because this shrinking is entirely subjective that has no effect on the objective world. It is entirely a product of nervous system upon the self.
Whether the meditating monk is 'free' from suffering in this state does not eliminate the body's presence and past, so the monk hungers and thirsts, but simply has no ability to prepare, or care...and is entirely dependent on others if he persists in this condition.
He feels the sensations as belonging entirely to the present, along with its gratification, but cannot be stressed by a plan of predicting and preparing for the gratification. The future no longer applied, and the past no longer matters.
He is not free from world when in this state. If a tiger approaches whether the meditating monk cares or not, will not affect the outcome. The physical, the body, remains determined and present, even when the mind becomes detached and unaware.

The practice of meditation is really an exercise, displaying the brain's power over the body and the mind.
It exposes the importance of the nervous system as synthesizing conduit of mind/body.
If applied in the Hellenic ascetic sense, it can increase self-control; if applied as an end in itself, it becomes a method of self-numbing escapism.

Reality Check....

yup, i saw this today too

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

There's a psychological motive at work here.
Why do some people refuse to acknowledge something that is happening around them?
They perceive and are interested in some patterns, and exceptions to rules, but then have a reluctance, bordering on defensiveness, to perceive other patterns, no matter how glaring they are.

They then come up with all sorts of justifications, and explanations to explain why they, and everyone else should pretend that some things are not happening.
They repeat the same lies, as if they were true, and then become defensive to the point of anger, when you call them out, or you challenge them, forcing them to explain and define and validate their beliefs.

They don't want to hear anything that confronts their comfort zones.
Their obsessiveness with the lie, becomes an accusation against those who cannot but expose the lie.
For them its 'good' it humane to repeat the lie, and not to doubt it, certainly not to contradict it.

Why would anyone speak out against a shared lie, right?
What kind of madness is that, especially when the lie is self-serving, comforting, for other reasons...the self-consistent lie, the 'logic' also serves to validate other lies, which the individual needs to cope with an uncertain threatening world.


Every age, in history, had a shared lie...a mythos, that was later disproved. The modern, in every age, laughs at the delusions previous generations held to be true. Each age considers itself the end of history, the height, the most advanced human state, and repeats the irrational lie it cannot defend without using emotions, feelings, violence.

There's a way to prevent this...and it is used by science. The scientific method is empirical. It uses world as a standard that is independent from social conventions and changing fashions and trends.
But moderns will not use this method. Though they clam to be atheists, often, or that they've surpassed Abrahamism, or other religious superposition, they refuse to let go of the tactics used to validate them.

Salvation that sacrifices an other, as in the case o ancient rituals, goes through and is dependent upon an other.
Salvation for self must go through a sacrifice of self.

There is no salvation, no liberation, without a sacrifice.
The sacrifice sanctifies salvation.

As a representation of the nervous system, synthesizing mind/body, the ideal/real, language is what exposes the individual's relationship with the world.
His reaction to the experienced real.
We are in the area of psychology....also called esoteric, which also includes emotions, feelings, all the automated reactions that have evolved over time.

The way in which the individual uses language reveals this esoteric reaction.
How he chooses to define words, and how he validates and justifies the beliefs he builds with them.

As I said before....how you define 'self', as an example, exposes your motive.
If you want to avoid a conclusion, a probability that binds you, you will define the word in a way that evades meaning, or evades a congruence between the internal/esoteric abstraction/map, and the external/empirical geography of patterns.
If, on the other hand, you want to use the word to exploit and manipulate, you will define it in a manner that mystifies, and remains open-ended enough to be adaptable to any psychology...like a fArtist creates abstract fArt.

But if your motive is noble and honest, wanting to use the word to clarify and engage world and the self in relation to it, you will define the word in a way that is pragmatic, experienced, testable, concise and clear.

The psychology of the hunter will differ from that of the hunted, as will the psychology of the parasite in relation to the host.
Each survival strategy will develop the traits and the tools to facilitate its success.

To parasitize, for example, requires particular talents, dependent no who the intended host is.
The essence of the host will determine the method.
Humans hosts can be approached from a psychological or from a physical perspective.

To exploit the human physically requires the honing of traits and tactics that differ from the one who wishes to exploit the human psychologically.
One approaches the 'victim' from the mind, to get to the body, and the other approaches from the body to get to the mind.
In both cases language is required, but in each case, a different kind of language, and a different application of it.

Bodily parasites usually numb the flesh so they are undetected. Then they will manipulate subtly their amount of numbing at particular times to provide incentive for one behavior or another. If bad to them, they cease numbing/cause pain. Mind parasites behave similarly, numbing the host to their intrusion and attacking from the shadows for their goals. Getting rid of the shadow (numbness) causes immense pain.

Slaughtz wrote:

Bodily parasites usually numb the flesh so they are undetected. Then they will manipulate subtly their amount of numbing at particular times to provide incentive for one behavior or another. If bad to them, they cease numbing/cause pain. Mind parasites behave similarly, numbing the host to their intrusion and attacking from the shadows for their goals. Getting rid of the shadow (numbness) causes immense pain.

The parasite's ability to numb the pain is sold to the host as its (the host's) "strength". Every time pain is induced, the parasite pretends that it was really just a predetermined circumstance that was bound to happen for the host's "bad behavior", and that it needs to "behave goodly" as a source of its strength: the numbing sensation. The parasite says "I am just an innocent bystander" and anything which is an affront to this frame is just 'naturally punished' when the parasite ceases the numbing sensation. When confronted, the parasite says that if it had the ability to control that sensation, then the host would be weak - or else the parasite would have never gotten hold to begin with. And, the parasite elaborates, if it had such control, would it not be a lot more greedy than it currently is? So, the parasite says, it really has the host's best interests in mind.

A thought that remains a thought has zero effect on reality. It may change the thinker's attitude, his psychology, and his performance in world...but not the world.

A thought has to be interpreted into an act, that interacts.
Just as a thought is created by interpreting (inter)actions, so must it be returned back to an (inter)action.
Otherwise it remains an idea(l), a theoretical abstraction.

A thought have no effect no world, or others....even if it may have an effect on the individual thinking it.
But then the effect is externalized as attitude, demeanour, confidence etc. increasing efficiency and effectiveness.
It does not guarantee anything.
A thought made (inter)action is confronted by other thoughts converted to (inter)actions, and to a world that remains indifferent. The conflict occurs in world, between competing interpretations, converted to ideas, and then returned to world as (inter)actions.

This seems obvious, but in this age of idiocy and feminization stating the obvious is what Orwell says is the "...duty of all intelligent men".

Slaughtz wrote:

Slaughtz wrote:

Bodily parasites usually numb the flesh so they are undetected. Then they will manipulate subtly their amount of numbing at particular times to provide incentive for one behavior or another. If bad to them, they cease numbing/cause pain. Mind parasites behave similarly, numbing the host to their intrusion and attacking from the shadows for their goals. Getting rid of the shadow (numbness) causes immense pain.

The parasite's ability to numb the pain is sold to the host as its (the host's) "strength". Every time pain is induced, the parasite pretends that it was really just a predetermined circumstance that was bound to happen for the host's "bad behavior", and that it needs to "behave goodly" as a source of its strength: the numbing sensation. The parasite says "I am just an innocent bystander" and anything which is an affront to this frame is just 'naturally punished' when the parasite ceases the numbing sensation. When confronted, the parasite says that if it had the ability to control that sensation, then the host would be weak - or else the parasite would have never gotten hold to begin with. And, the parasite elaborates, if it had such control, would it not be a lot more greedy than it currently is? So, the parasite says, it really has the host's best interests in mind.

Of course, the host cannot tell to what degree a parasite is greedy since it has the ability to numb, except by the degree to which the parasite does protest. There is an unknown amount of suffering to be gotten by the host if they attempt to fully commit themselves, 'with faithfulness' or zeal, to removing the parasite. The parasite takes advantage of this unknown by suggesting that its power is greater than it really is; that the host attempting to remove it just in the small manner before, and the parasite's reaction of de-numbing, was really in 'measure' and that any more zealous attempts would result in that much more painful or more difficult of an extraction. Hence the shallow and unbelievable bravado, or 'chutzpah'.

The tribe's relationship with the earth, the soil, is what distinguishes the Pragmatic Pagan from the nihilistic ideologue.
For the noble tribes earth and blood are what shape tribe, and race - shapes his identity.
For the nihilist his identity is entirely theoretical, an ideology he carries with him in his mind, and can replace with another.
This shapes two different methods:
Top<>Down & Bottom<>Up

Two different world views, and understanding of language and nationality.
For the nihilist nationality is a geographical area populations enter and leave.
For the pragmatic pagan nationality is the soil drenched in his people's blood and sweat. It is the relationship between a people and an environment.
His use of language and symbols reflects this relationship, as does the nihilist's use of words to detach and to fabricate at will, or to deny and dismiss with whimsical cynicism.
For the Pagan words connect him to the world; world determining their meaning.
They are not arbitrary and subjective.
World is the object that determines the subject's use of language, tools, art.
World represented as gods.

When a tribe is defeated on the battlefield, on the physical plains of existence, it suffers this loss as a form of castration, as a kind of lobotomy - a theoretical and literal emasculation, and internal schism.
Then its mind turns to coping or responding to what damaged it.
It may be inspired by the victor, or it may seek retribution by embracing its own feminine side. Adapting to its new circumstances it adopts feminine forms of retribution and conflict.
The feminine was always adept in language because lacking physical and mental force, she sought power in manipulating using symbols, gestures, innuendos.

The feminine seeks power in associations, through others; she seeks to rally others in her defence; she seeks to be pitied when she is exposed; she seeks communal protection.
Vicious, manipulative, and quick to cry.
She changes alliances with gracious dexterity, and loses no sleep over it.
Some tribes have adopted the feminine method to compensate for the loss of their manhood.

The tendency of constantly flattering yourself, or including into your sentences mentions of your hypothetical talents or gifts, is usually an indication of being uncertain about the very things you repeat, wanting to believe they apply to you.
Having never been appreciated, on those virtues, the mind projects them as casual propositions, seeking to hear them echoed back, as validations.
Impressing through repeated declarations, is what marketers use in commercials.

The association of the virtue with the symbol is solidified through constant reiteration.
The weak mind, if affected, cannot think of the word without triggering the product, the image, and the sensation it attempts to evoke.
Similarly, the insecure mind projects the image, or concept, the traits, it wants the other to think of in association with his name.
Unable to provoke it, spontaneously, the individual resorts to declaring it himself, about himself.

The real requires no words to validate it. It is (inter)action.
The fake, the lie, the false is entirely founded on words, and it only exist in words and symbols. It is entirely semiotic.
It repeats itself in order to exist, as a hypothesis, a theory, a possibility for (inter)action.

Another kind of psychosis.
The feminine one, tuning children against their fathers.
A father accused of molesting his daughter. A daughter raised by a single demented mother to believe her father molested her.





Feminists say nothing about this.
Self-Deception at work.

How many men are wrongly accused.
How many of these rape accusations are true?