Psychology 101

Insanity is preferable to the world, in many cases. The mind evolved as a organ dedicated to preserving the body, within which it resides, and to self-preserve. If this means insanity, then this is salvation.

Confusion, built or linguistic Gordian Knots, is perfectible to dealing with an uncertain world.
The mind preferring to entangle itself in its own tricks than attempt to come to terms with the world, and itself in it.
It knows how to escape, but it does not even dare. Instead it wants to entangle all into its snares so that it does not feel ashamed, nor risk being discovered to be a self-deceiving coward.
The mind has already managed self-deceit but it cannot manage deceiving others.
This is its dilemma.
It can live with shame, because life is worth all sacrifices, and it has already mastered the art of self-entanglement.....but how will it survive others seeing its shame?
How many can it entangle with its linguistic webs that connect nowhere?

Modern man is addictive to remaining infantile, to remaining an adolescent.
He cannot grow up....he wants an adult to oversee his choices, to step in and protect him from the mistakes he makes.
He thinks it is his 'right' to be as child-like as possible.
Someone else, if not God then an institution, the state, must provide services to protect the individual from his own bad judgments.
He demands this so that he will never have to face the possibility that he may be inferior....a moron.
The system has to produce artificial parity by protecting the imbecile form his own stupidity.

This is cultural Marxism.
Ex-Christians, addicted to a father figure in the sky, have to replace 'daddy' with a secular father....an abstraction....an institution.
How else can he continue to believe all people are the product of a social system?

Nihilistic evolution.

God made everything.
We made everything.
I made everything.

He...Us....I...
Submission to another Will; submission to a communal will; submission to my will.

God as other; God as humanity; God as individual.

When the coward failed to find God, or any absolute, he took what he had an named it God.
Humanity was first...but he still felt oppressed, or judged...so he proceeded to declare self a god.
Some, having followed their delusional reasoning down to its own logical end, recoiled....but they did not accept an error....they simply adjusted.
If all were not created, controlled, determined by a benevolent consciousness, then all would be rendered nil.
If no one god, one humanity, then nil.

Positive Nihilism when disillusioned becomes pure Nihilism.
If all judgments cannot be equally correct, then they will be equally wrong.
No gradations....no superior/inferior.
Absolutely right, or absolutely wrong.

Natural selection and Evolution Theory is challenged...but not directly. This would expose how ridiculous nihilism is.
It implies it indirectly:
All are sinners beneath God - parity in sin, and salvation allocation.
All are citizens beneath the State - parity in production and resource allocation.

God's paradise reserved for the faithful.
Marxism Utopia reserved for the loyal.

Those who were born and raised to believe in the Abrahamic god, become addicted to it.
The faith gives them direction, tells them what to do and when to do it and how to do it.
There's an actual manual on how to live your life.

They like this. They become accustomed to this level of prenatal control.
The idea of growing-up and taking responsibility for their own choices and judgments, fills them with anxiety. They do not trust their own minds.
From Abrahamism they quickly become Marxists, which also guides them, commands them, releases them from the responsibility of their own life.
Many turn to cults, gangs.
They need an external father and mother figure to be an authority.
To tell them how to live their life, or what life is worth living.

Philosophy cannot fill in this void.
All philosophy does is survey the world and report on it.
From there it may offer some guidelines on how to deal with the world as it is described, but in a very general way.
Describing the world and how different phenomena mesh into webs (meaning), is the philosophical objective.
Telling the individual how to navigate theses interconnecting webs, and what destination to aim for is not philosophy's concern.
All it can do is determine if the destination is real, and not an idea in someone's head, and to accurately evaluate the destination so that it is not warped by human emotions and expectations.

The rest is up to the individual.
If he or she needs help he ought to seek it in a professional, called a psychiatrist, or a mentor, some friend that knows him/her, because this is a matter of how the individual relates to the world.
A general description of humanity philosophy can offer....even some general types...but not an individualized assessment on how a specific person ought to do, because knowledge of the individual, his strengths and weaknesses, his particular quirks, his particular circumstances are always slightly different.
Philosophy gives broad guidelines.
It describes the world, primarily, and phenomena within reality, including species, such as homo sapiens, but it does not offer a person by person plan.
That's the responsibility of each individual.

His or her judgments will have consequences that he or she should accept, and not demand that the system, or another, step in to protect him from the consequences of his own judgments.

It is possible for a man who feels bitter towards those of his own kind to ally himself with their, and his enemies to find vengeance.
Vengeance against his own blood.
This has been associated with the r/ reproductive strategy, related to herbivorous species, usually living in large groups....such as herds.
We may find its psychological counterpart among social carnivores - the omega-male complex.
The alpha, is the dominant, and the beta is the challenger aspiring to be alpha, then there's the gamma, who is both and neither.....but then there's the lowly omega.
Such a psychology would feel closer to the enemies of his own kind, than to his own kind.  
They, like him, despise the same higher echelons of the same social group... his group.
This is the psychology of those who feel rejected, that only have others to blame for their lowly state.
It's underlies the Marxist psychology, and is the root of Abrahamism.

For females it is entirely different, because the female is attracted to anything that she intuitively senses as powerful, and what can produce a safe, harmonious environment within which to gestate and ween her potential offspring, and within which she can aspire to make long-term alliances.  
Her motive is to support any system that will be stable, rich in resources and safe. She prefers popular movements, because quantities hold power and belonging, and her reproductive role requires of her to be included within a powerful entity, such as a group.
A female may resent the males of her own tribe when they impose rules that force her to settle for inferior males, because the superior males are all taken.
Monogamy is such a restriction that females both benefit from and secretly despise.
Females want to have the healthiest, smartest, most fit babies possible, and when the males in her group push upon her a male that, in her estimation, is substandard, she resents this. She is intuitively drawn to superior males, and tribal and/or racial identities do not matter to her, particularly when she is a beta or omega female.
Her genes make her filter out inferior genes, even if they belong to her own kind.

The omega male will find an ally in the female, for he is not that different to a female....being that he is an emasculated male.
A female will despise authoritarian masculinity that imposes strict rules upon her sexual conduct, or that is brutal, and will find in the omega a friend.
The popularity of Abrahamism among females and the lower strata of males is understandable....and this also explains the popularity of Marxism, and currently of post-modernity, among the same demographics.

The omega may also display an attraction to powerful masculine icons, as a way of compensating for his effete nature.
Both females and omega-males may even support hyper-masculinity in other tribes, in other groups, because these alien groups challenge their own alpha and beta males, even if their own kind may be less vulgar, and brutal.
Undermining his own people is a subconscious motive underlying all omega-male ambitions.
Omega's may rewrite the history of their own tribe to decrease its appeal, to slander and degrade it; may redefine the intellectual and physical works of his own people, to make them appear more akin to other tribes, or to the tribe they've rallied behind to avenge themselves against their own kind.
An omega, is unable to aspire to become an alpha, or even a beta, so he may be attracted to passive ideologies, promising egalitarianism, peace, fairness, openness to other tribes...anything to diminish the bloodlines that made him possible.
He would rather destroy his own bloodline than live with the knowledge that he was its lowest product.

Self-Handicapping can explain what risk-taking is. A signaling of genetic potency.
The ‘risk taker’, usually feels confident that a loss will not be too costly, because he has many options. His wealth in options, in choices, whether actual or not, are what compels him to take chances.
This is sexually attractive to females. It signifies confidence before the unknown. A sense that whatever the consequences, whatever the circumstances that may come about, that the male can recuperate the losses, that he can survive any possible costs.
It’s attractive to a female on a visceral level. She needs to feel secure in order to become sexually aroused. She has to feel safe to fall into estrus, to successfully carry a child to term, and then raise it to the age when it can survive without her help.

There's nastiness to the 'nice guy' attitude; an underlying passive-aggressive vindictiveness that fits well with that of a ‘bitchy female’.
A female's social negativity can be the consequence of her being rejected by males of her own kind, or of her being forced to settle for an inferior male, in her estimation.
She avenges herself against superior females and males who she wants but who are denied to her, by allying with a male who is also rejected, or feels insecure and unable to compete with males in his own group, with his own peers.
Both become enemies of their own group, showing their self-hatred as a hatred of all who remind them of themselves, or towards all who make them recall to mind an idealized ‘self’ they can never become.
Instead of striving to attain the idea(l) they choose the easier path of trying to tear it down. Their insecurity becomes self-destructive.
Allying with the enemies of those before whom they feel insecure and embarrassed, is a way of trying to expunge their shame.
If we take into account the fact that all groups produce a small minority at the top of the hierarchy and masses at the bottom we can understand the popularity of left leaning politics.
Large groups produce masses of disfranchised, bitter, insecure, lower ranking individuals that become aware of their genetic lot in life and cannot bear the burden of such awareness.
So called, 'nice guys' are usually easy going, quiet, flexible, because they’ve learned how to repress their anger, and express the most amicable character.
Always willing to do whatever it takes to avoid frictions that may expose themselves to situations that they fear may reveal their inferiority.
Their only sexual option is to become a proverbial ‘carpet’ for females to walk all over, hoping she will compensate them for this sacrifice with sexual favours and, perhaps, an offspring. Secretly they resent that they are forced to become so.
They may resent both females, for being too sexually demanding, and males who don't have to submit to female whims.
This resentment may become animosity towards their own clan. The ones that remind them of what they failed to become.
An alien clan is too different to rouse such feelings in them. They feel sufficiently comforted by the genetic and memetic distance.
So much so that they may even become emotionally open enough, comfortable enough to drop their defensive guard and feel kinship with these strangers, and enemies of their own kind.
Over time they may feel closer with those who threaten their own bloodline; a secret hope arising that when their own clan is eradicated it will also take with it their shame.
For inferior, resentful, females, the process is different, because in the alien tribe she may find desirable males who want to use her as a way of destroying her people. Using females of a tribe to shame a tribe, is a common practice.
You attack the enemy’s soft spot.
The female may find this attention invigorating, flattering. Her own tribe rejects her, or forces her to mate with a substandard male, but this tribe holds her in high regard. The different, the exotic, is always something to be coveted, to be sampled.
An inferior female may find herself successfully competing with the superior females of another tribe, when this other tribe feels inferior to her own.

Her 'bitchiness' is the expression of all this pent-up hostility, venting itself when the opportunity arises.
So 'nice guy' and 'bitch' can find in one another a friend.

What does the rejected male do when he is denied glory, and parity with those who stand above him?
What does the story tell us?
Depicted as a warped, hunched individual, he 'lives forever' as 'nightmare', who placed his won survival above that of any other consideration.
The warped spirit who sought to avenge itself against its own kind, simply because he could not be among the best.


The coward who betrays his own kind, who brings shame to his ancestors. The one who could not rise, so he pulled down.
This is the story we are living through, only the psychological cripples are not one but many nightmares.
Those who side with barbarians to avenge thir genetic inferiority against those who remind them of it.
May they live forever with themselves.

Liars and hypocrites never speak clearly.

Charlie Zeneoff is obviously mentally ill, I've watched some video before and was amazed how nobody thought of stopping the whole circus and helping the poor guy(so much so for civilization and American tolerance amongst these low IQ retards) and instead cheered as he got beaten by some dumb nigger twice his size who is a proffesional fighter...

Between him and the "NeetHog" video, i believe i have seen my dose of modern excrement to last the next year or so, as illuminating as it is. Like occasionally shopping for clothes. You endure the sickening braindead consumer retail environment for the designated reason, and then get the hell out as fast as you can before you suffocate on it.

The weak and inferior attempting to become strong results in aberrations which expose them. The act of commitment, is a human act of purpose which carries with it the defining elements of someones worth. Therefore, no matter how much they fail, they must compensate by inverting it to mean a reinforcement of their strength and worth. No matter how many times he is exposed and put in his place and humiliated, he has already given himself over to the purpose of his delusion and must still claim victory, as he sits on the ground bloodied and defeated. He must scramble and find ways to turn it into a benefit, a merit, so as to protect his chosen constitution, or he simply denies it ever happened and suppresses it.

The attraction in such minds of possessing messianic power or the cultist mentality to be the "second coming", is the appropriate source of inferior unrecognized power they attach themselves to, to actualize their own inferiority. Christ conquered nothing, but only intellectually, indirectly, by proxy of human limitations, called "sins". He is powerful without being powerful, and so these minds proclaim themselves as such and honor that calling to their weakness. They don't have to prove anything, as much as they want to, because they are already sacred, they are already powerful, they possess power that is ineffable and inexplicable. He doesn't need to defeat any fighter, he only needs to feel secure and safe in the haven of his pure weakness; power, never to be tapped into, as it just suffuses like a glow that everyone should be wary of.

What is really depressing, other than the fact they vote, and their vote counts as much as anyone else's, is that they are an extreme case that cannot hide itself, or does not know how insane it is.
For every one of these crazies there are a dozen lower grade crazies.
Zelenoff, for example is insane, but there are other Zelenoff, not as insane, or sane enough to know not to expose this part of themselves.

I know grown men, 40+ who still go to Fung Fu and think they are tough, when all they are doing is giving their money to some clever China-man to play along with their psychosis.
To become even close to a expert you have to practice the martial arts like a religion - day in and day out, 365 days a year, 24/7.
Going to a dojo and practice hand and body movements will do shit for you in a fight, because then you revert to instinct.
To practice to such a level that the movements become second-nature - automatic.

Kvasir wrote:

The weak and inferior attempting to become strong results in aberrations which expose them. The act of commitment, is a human act of purpose which carries with it the defining elements of someones worth. Therefore, no matter how much they fail, they must compensate by inverting it to mean a reinforcement of their strength and worth. No matter how many times he is exposed and put in his place and humiliated, he has already given himself over to the purpose of his delusion and must still claim victory, as he sits on the ground bloodied and defeated. He must scramble and find ways to turn it into a benefit, a merit, so as to protect his chosen constitution, or he simply denies it ever happened and suppresses it.

The attraction in such minds of possessing messianic power or the cultist mentality to be the "second coming", is the appropriate source of inferior unrecognized power they attach themselves to, to actualize their own inferiority. Christ conquered nothing, but only intellectually, indirectly, by proxy of human limitations, called "sins". He is powerful without being powerful, and so these minds proclaim themselves as such and honor that calling to their weakness. They don't have to prove anything, as much as they want to, because they are already sacred, they are already powerful, they possess power that is ineffable and inexplicable. He doesn't need to defeat any fighter, he only needs to feel secure and safe in the haven of his pure weakness; power, never to be tapped into, as it just suffuses like a glow that everyone should be wary of.

'Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome'....as Einstein said....I think.
Delusion is about being unable to distinctions your own responsibility in the outcome. You repeat the same thing, blaming the other, or the world, as if you had no part in the failure.
Some twist every failure into a victory. this is spin-doctoring as self-deception.
Everything that happens was 'planned', it was intended.
So they never fail, and because they never fail, they never have to change.

I don't know how this freak Zelenoff rationalized his arse getting kicked but I'm sure that after the shock he forgot the details, and reinvented a different situation.
Compartmentalization.
He can do no wrong....his judgment is never in doubt....his sanity not in question.

I know guys who do this in these philosophy forums.
They do not know how they are embarrassing themselves. In their mind they are genius', winning defeating others.
Even when they are put in their place they make it into an intentional act - like ti was part of a scheme that is always self-flattering.
They never make mistakes so they never have to correct themselves...or the mistakes they make are minuscule, small little adjustments....sometimes the errors in judgment has a self-flattering justification.

And like this moron in the vid, there's no reasoning with such crazies.
All you are doing is wasting your time.

The thing with psychosis is that the same traumatic event can produce in a sheltered mind what leaves a stronger mind less affected.
Like a man who never exercises lifting 50 kg can get injured when for a man who lifts weight every day feels the same weight as light.
The first man may even have more inherited genetic potential to be stronger than the second man.  

Sheltering, atrophies the mind....the psyche to the point where a small stress can be devastating to it.
This is what is going on with these social activists.
Spoiled brats, raised to feel they deserve this and that, finding the slightest reminder of the world's indifference to be too devastating for them to deal with, demanding that the humanity protects them.

This is one of the reasons I say that philosophy is not for everyone.

There are three factors involved:
1- genetics - inherited potential for endurance - psychosomatic strength.  
2- intelligence - mental agility, memory, artistry, imagination.
3- courage - the ability not only to see the world as it is but to be able to keep looking even when you want to turn and flee.

World is not positive, benevolent....it is indifferent.
It does not give a shot about what you like, what you need, what you hope for, what your dreams are....how insulted you get, or how hurt.
That's your problem.  

You either see it or you risk getting hurt worse, if there is no protective sheltering system there....and even then, it cannot completely protect you from the world.

Philosophy demands a high degree of integrity.
If it were only about having a creative mind to fabricate self-flattering, self-comforting, self-deceiving, self-consistent possibilities, then many people would be brilliant philosophers, and we would not only respect a handful, after thousands of years of human history.
If philosophy were about being 'happy' then female intellectuals would be the only ones we needed.
Philosophy is NOT about being happy, discovering how to be happy....or anything to do with happiness.
I mean, one of the side-effects might be that you become more content with yourself and what you have and with what you are....but that's not a guarantee, and ti certainly is not philosophy's primary intent.

Cycle of Spiritual Decay
The layman has to be given a watered down, simplified version of the collective's knowledge and understanding of the world, and how to deal with it.
A metaphorical narrative is created that can be easily remembered and that passes on messages that the collective benefits from.
The narratives are believed in literally by the mediocre and below, the majority, the masses, because symbolism and allegories will not suffice to produce the intended outcome, which is discipline to a behaviour the upper 1%, over centuries have determined to be ideal, for producing the kind of society they decided was good for the collective, including themselves.
But this makes the masses vulnerable to con-artists and hypocrites ho will exploit the literal understanding of what is metaphorical and hiding complexity, and sophistication the masses cannot fully comprehend and what they can would not suffice to make them discipline themselves to theoretical ideal.
The wise men protect the masses from those charlatans, and their linguistic methods of manipulating the allegories.

But as the group declines the protections also deteriorate.
The masses are increasingly exposed to a variety of charlatans, each with his own version of the shared narrative.
This is the period messiahs and prophets appear on urban squares.
Superstitions rise.
The masses and their literal comprehensions of the metaphorical narratives makes them vulnerable to metaphorical adjustments.
At this point competing meta-narratives emerge and compete over control of the masses that once belonged to a group.
One of these gradually takes over, restarting the process.

Woman, as representative of natural order becomes the obsession of man who through her wants to dominate and become master of his own fate.
Woman is divided, being both mother (agape), and lover (eros).
Feeling sympathy with the plight of man, in her mind, but remaining a cold judge of merit, in her body.
Woman's double face, confuses man, as does existence's fluidity which he can only experience through abstractions.
A woman's acceptance, her approval, her physical embrace, her erotic opening-up, becomes a cosmic validation of his essence.
In her the boy is reborn a man, and the man reborn as boy.

Language is the ambiguous point of synthesis of mind/body, and it is there where detachment must begin. Words are fetishized, by the minds using them. Manipualted to display their passionate rejection of a reality they cannot change, nor escape – fight or flight being unavailable leaves them in a state of frozen despair. They can only turn inward, hopnig to find there what they cannot in the outside.
Mind obsess over word(s) that represent its pleasing escape into the mind's ecstasy.
We see this clearly in how many use the word 'Dasein': as their idealized, disconnect from reality; mystical word, used like a defnsive magical spell.
It's like a man's fantasy woman. An idealized fantasy he uses to explain his rejection of real females – they do not meet the exacting challenge of his idea(l), covnerting their rejection of him inot his rejection of them.
This can also be used to justify a settling for any woman... the idea(l) becoming what nobody can ever have, so all must settle and hide this settling in the idealization of the only female they can have.
The word becomes an abstraction of the idea(l) that detaches, and through detachment one feels relief – salvation.
A substitute for god.
It must be the same word, because god is one, by any other name.
One specimen uses 'value', another uses 'affect', or 'power'. It can be any word, because it automatically becomes divine – meaning it becomes the imaginary point of detachment from world – a version of hell. The word is idealized – an oral or symbol-key for opening heaven’s gates. It's the word that triggers the fall inward; backward into the self. It acts as a power word, a magical spell that begins the process. It's the 'first' word, the primary....'first was 'the word', and the word was ....'
The mind experiences it as an empowering incantation, because the falling back into self is a falling into the mind’s sanctuary; the secret, safe world where the will is God. A falling into mind.
The word cannot be defined... not in the normal dictionary way, referring to a phenomenon. This would destroy the word's magical force.
The word is undefinable, meaningless... it cannot have a meaning because this would discharge its magical force.
Like the Abrahamic word 'god' it has to remain undefinable, mystical – all things to all minds... everything and anything... nothing.
What one must learn is how to use the word to produce the desired affect.
It's only meaning is felt, inside, where its meaning changes from moment to moment.
Normally 'meaning' refers to the inter-relation of phenomena; mapped-out in the mind and referring to an external geography.
In this case it remain meaningless, because the map in the mind refers back to the mind, or it refers to internal organ relationships – a mapping of the body's relationships (organ hierarchies), experienced as sensations and emotions in the mind.
So, the same word will have a slightly different meaning for every mind trained to use it in the same way – subjectivity.
For practitioners the experience is invigorating. They want to make all words into the same mystical esoteric force – world creating code, contructing a personal, private space/time.
No longer referring to a troubling, threatening, unyielding, imposing external world, but back into the self – then projected outward to usurp reality by covering it up.
I've described the two methods of escapism – the covering of self, away from world, and the covering of world, away from self.
Semiotics become a weave, a tarp, one can throw over reality, so that the mind no longer sees, while it remains awake – eyes wide shut.
To exist in a world one no longer cares to witness.

Distance makes the 'heart grow fonder'.
The mind perceives distance as an open field of possibilities.
The world does not intrude on the mind's evaluations; all merges and separates. The loss of detail permits speculation, and the positive dominates.
'Good from afar; far from good'.
Distance allows the spirit to forget and forgive.
A open expanse of space/time between observer and observed.
The mind stands in the open, safe behind a wall of distance. Possibility and duration lose their immediacy; remoteness pushes them away, towards the horizon – the edge of perception.
Distance is what language uses to detach mind from world.
Making language vague acts like the effect of mediating space/time.
An imitation of haze, fabricated by the intentional ambiguity of symbols.
At a distance all seems beautiful; the mind projecting, filling in gaps in perception with its desires.
At a distance the object is concealed though it stands revealed.
All fades with time, all fades with space.
Past is cleansed of its worse elements when memory recalls events from the depths of distant time/space. Distance is divine, sanctifying all.
It permits the mind to wash away the written, and rewrite its own script.

Superstition is a useful tool for placating the masses born in a sheltering system.
Without it the majority would go mad, or worse, they would become destructive, and detrimental to the establishment of complex systems integrating heterogeneous  populations.

But superstition is not a foundation for a rational philosophy, discussed by wise men who can tell the difference between what is, and what is valuable, relative to a goal.
It may be useful when dealing with children, women, and feeble males, but it is not philosophy.
Our culture has many narratives used to produce an effect among the simple, the immature, and the desperate.

A big problem faced by the superstitious that speaking the 'goal' (in context to morality being relative to a goal) makes it dead, especially when they are categorizing something fundamental to their being. It is a humiliation to report every motive, and a slow-death. Speaking such motives can be confused for power, as a sign of 'indifference', especially interpreted by women. Here lies the power of the libelous, defacing even themselves for a 'higher power'. What they speak plainly is natures by men who would injure them; conflating through libel such things as originating in 'selfishness' as the Christian populace uses today to assign maliciousness. In any other society, such conflation of someone's behavior to something so simple is considered an insult to those without the ability to dialectically outmaneuver. Jews refer to it as 'chutzpah', hiding behind a civic institution to prevent consequences.

A man who seeks frontiers, seeks mysteries - and to label the frontier he pursues so simply is to get rid of any mystery to it and lose anya passion for its seeking and a disconnect from the earthly means of its acquisition. Going into semantics to rescue what would be left behind, he only spirals out of control into dialectical peacocking, finding himself trying to rescue from profanity, the sacred (to him).

An underrated form of data exchange is what is called 'body language'.
I've said that the body cannot lie, whereas the mind can....and so the body is the source of shame and anxiety.

Females are intuitively gifted in deciphering body cues.
Males, not so much....they rely more on verbal language: direct, obvious, clear, literal.
Females need more subtlety, reading between the lines, reading the body juxtaposed to what is being expressed through words.
The conflict and/or harmony between mind/body is exposed in the juxtaposition between physical/mental data exchange.



Everyone does this....some consciously most unconsciously.
They are comparing the body's data (interactivity) with the mind's data (language)...and there is a subtext to both.
Language has a triad of meaning....if it is sophisticated, corresponding to body/nervous system/mind.

The body also has a text, automated reactions, and a subtext, the will attempting to control and direct these reactions - a duality.
Body is governed by dualities, binary logic, the on/off, corresponding to the organism relating to the world - I/other: good/bad, friend/foe, fight/flight....

It's proper that a woman is narrating her understanding of body-language.
Women are masters of this, even those who have no clue what they are doing.....they call it intuition, or feeling, or sensing, attributing it to some metaphysical or spiritual explanation.

Ironic how Hollywood villains are portrayed as wanting to nuke the world when this is Israel’s official “Samson option” military strategy. [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

— Will Westcott (@westland_will) [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

Freud calls it projecting and it has an established morally negative connotation for most people.
A question would be whether or not it is an accurate projection or an inaccurate one.

Another would be the motivation behind various kinds of false projections.
Some will use false projections as a defensive measure in emergency situations where they feel they are under attack.

The (((tribe))) could be thought of as always feeling under attack, that would explain things. But I think that's an inaccurate goyish projection based on why and when they would make false defensive projections themselves. The more real pressure and threat you can apply to a (((tribesman))) the more he squirms and caves in, this is when he will stop the "false projections".
When he feels safe and secure on the other hand...